Next Article in Journal
Using Dynamic Pruned N-Gram Model for Identifying the Gender of the User
Next Article in Special Issue
Actimetry-Derived 24 h Rest–Activity Rhythm Indices Applied to Predict MCTQ and PSQI
Previous Article in Journal
Empirical Modeling and Optimization by Active Central Composite Rotatable Design: Brilliant Red HE-3B Dye Biosorption onto Residual Yeast Biomass-Based Biosorbents
Previous Article in Special Issue
A Closer Look at the Sleep/Wake Habits and Dark Triad Traits
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Daytime Lipid Metabolism Modulated by CLOCK Gene Is Linked to Retinal Ganglion Cells Damage in Glaucoma

1
Laboratory for Chronobiology and Chronomedicine, Research Institute of Biomedicine and Biomedical Technologies, Medical University, 625023 Tyumen, Russia
2
Department of Biology, Medical University, 625023 Tyumen, Russia
3
Tyumen Cardiology Research Center, Tomsk National Research Medical Center, Russian Academy of Science, 634009 Tomsk, Russia
4
Helmholtz Research Institute of Eye Diseases, 105062 Moscow, Russia
5
Laboratory for Genomics, Metabolomics and Proteomics, Research Institute of Biomedicine and Biomedical Technologies, Medical University, 625023 Tyumen, Russia
6
Laboratory of Genetics, Institute of Biology of the Karelian Science Center of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 185910 Petrozavodsk, Russia
7
Department of Zoology, Institute of Biology/Zoology, Martin Luther University, 06108 Halle, Germany
8
Department of Endocrinology, Medical University, 625023 Tyumen, Russia
9
State Autonomous Health Care Institution Tyumen Regional Ophthalmological Dispensary, 625048 Tyumen, Russia
10
Halberg Chronobiology Center, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55455, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Appl. Sci. 2022, 12(13), 6374; https://doi.org/10.3390/app12136374
Submission received: 25 May 2022 / Revised: 16 June 2022 / Accepted: 20 June 2022 / Published: 23 June 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Research on Circadian Rhythms in Health and Disease)

Abstract

:

Featured Application

Compromised light perception, as with retinal ganglion cell loss, is associated with serum lipids being unevenly altered in the morning vs. the evening, depending on CLOCK gene polymorphism. One should consider this in the diagnosis of retinal and metabolic conditions.

Abstract

Lipid metabolism is intimately linked to circadian mechanisms and light signaling. Deteriorated photic transduction because of retinal ganglion cell (RGC) loss occurring with glaucoma progression reduces perceived light amplitude, causing circadian disruption. To investigate associations with RGCs, total cholesterol (TC), its low-density (LDL-C) and high-density (HDL-C) fractions, and triglycerides (TG) were measured, under a controlled meal regimen, during daytime hours in 114 patients diagnosed with primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG). RGC damage was assessed by high-definition optical coherence tomography (HD-OCT). Analysis of eight clock, clock-related, and melatonin receptor gene polymorphisms was performed on 19 patients. RGC loss was associated with changes in lipid metabolism in a time-dependent manner. Morning (08:00) values of HDL-C (r = 0.613, p < 0.0001) and TG (r = 0.568, p < 0.0001) correlated positively with RGC global loss, while LDL-C at 08:00 had a weak correlation (r = 0.235; p = 0.012) but showed a strong correlation in the evening (20:00) (r = 0.533, p < 0.0001). The morning–evening gradients (MEGs, changes at 20:00 versus 08:00) in TC and LDL-C changed sign from a negative to a positive association in patients exceeding the 15% two-eye mean GLV threshold. MEG (LDL-C higher in the evening than in the morning) was positive only in POAG patients with the CLOCK_3111 TT genotype.

1. Introduction

Lipid metabolism is entwined with the circadian machinery, and its alterations are closely associated with circadian disruption [1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15]. One factor that causes deterioration in circadian rhythms is glaucomatous damage to retinal ganglion cells (RGCs), which compromises light perception and signal transduction to the master clock (suprachiasmatic nuclei in the brain). RGC damage was found to be associated with disrupted local [16,17] and systemic [18,19,20,21] circadian rhythms, as well as sleep [22,23]. Circadian rhythms of lipid metabolism are modulated by light and food [5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15]. Furthermore, light and the extent of the day–night intensity differences modulate chronotype, sleep parameters, and circadian alignment [24,25,26,27,28]. This also occurs in glaucoma [29]. Seasonal differences in serum lipids [30,31] can in part be accounted for by differences in ambient light conditions [32,33]. There are substantial differences in circadian and seasonal phases in the rhythms of different serum lipids [31]. Recently, phase response curves (PRCs) of circadian lipid rhythms to light and food that appeared to differ between lipid fractions (e.g., LDL-C failed to demonstrate a PRC) were characterized [15].
On the other hand, dyslipidemia is associated with an increased risk of glaucoma and elevated intraocular pressure (IOP) [34]. Specific associations of glaucomatous damage and RGC loss with changes in total cholesterol, its low-density (LDL-C) and high-density (HDL-C) fractions, and triglycerides, (TG) were previously reported [34,35,36,37]. Taken together, changes in lipid metabolism can be both a factor predisposing to RGC damage in glaucoma and a consequence of RGC loss, which reduces the amplitude of perceived daylight photic information and compromises circadian rhythms.
To the best of our knowledge, data on lipid metabolism collected at different day times in relation to RGCs loss in glaucoma are currently lacking. Therefore, this study investigated how changes in serum lipids, assessed at different times of the day, depend on RGC loss that occurs with glaucoma. The role of clock genes, melatonin receptor gene polymorphisms, and salivary melatonin profiles was assessed in a subgroup of patients.

2. Results

2.1. Lipid Metabolism Was Associated with Retinal Ganglion Cells Loss

Daytime mean (DM) of TC gradually increased with RGCs loss, being higher with each 5% GLV% increase, Figure 1. Higher DM of TG and LDL-C and lower DM of HDL-C were linked to GLV% values above 15%. DM of LDL-C in the GLV 15–25% subgroup was higher than in the GLV 1–5% subgroup.

2.2. Changes of Lipid Metabolism during the Day Depend on RGC Loss. Evening–Morning Gradient of Cholesterol and Low-Density Lipids Was Associated with Retinal Ganglion Cells Loss

RGC loss above 15% was associated with higher TG and lower HDL-C, with no change in the daytime pattern of these lipids. Higher TC and LDL-C were associated with glaucoma progression, and with changes in their daytime pattern, Figure 2, as indicated from ANOVA with time and degree of RGC damage as cofactors.
Most prominent were changes between morning (08:00) and evening (20:00) values of serum lipids. We defined such changes as the morning–evening gradient (MEG), which was investigated in four subgroups at different stages of GLV. An evening increase instead of a decrease in TC and LDL-C was evident in patients with RGC loss above 15%, and even more so in patients with RGC loss above 25%, Figure 2. Linear regression analysis confirmed the stronger correlation of LDL-C with RGC loss and GLV%, in the evening as compared to morning, Figure 3 (Dunn and Clark’s z = −5.069, p < 0.0001). MEGs notably changed sign from a decrease to an increase at the RGC GLV 15% threshold. Only the LDL-C MEGs increased further for RGC damage above 25%, Figure 4.
Since serum lipids also change as a function of age, we used age as a co-factor in the multiple regression assessing the effect of lipids on RGC GLV, Table 1. We found that GLV was more strongly associated than age with TG, HDL-C, or TC, both in the morning and in the evening. LDL-C surpassed age, however, only in the case of evening values and MEGs. Strong positive associations between MEGs and RGC GLV% were evident for all studied serum lipids (TG, b = 0.417 ± 0.089; TC, b = 0.720 ± 0.066; LDL-C, b = 0.557 ± 0.078), except for HDL-C (not significant). Of note, the relationship of TG DM with age (negative correlation, b = −0.320 ± 0.089) was opposite to that with GLV% (positive correlation, b = 0.417 ± 0.089), Table 1.

2.3. Morning–Evening Gradient of Low-Density Lipids Was Linked to Retinal Ganglion Cell Loss and CLOCK Gene Polymorphism

A subgroup of 19 patients was used to study associations between lipid patterns and MEGs, and between lipid patterns, MEGs and clock, clock-controlled, and melatonin-receptor genes. Fifteen of these patients were also used to study salivary melatonin profiles. No significant associations were found between lipid patterns, MEGs, and parameters of salivary melatonin (mean, circadian amplitude, circadian phase, or peak time). Among gene polymorphisms, a significant association was found between CLOCK_3111 rs1801260 and LDL-C MEG, Table 2. This single nucleotide polymorphism, SNP, was previously linked to the sleep–wake cycle, body weight, and lipid metabolism. Some studies considered minor C allele as protective, linked to lower cholesterol in Russian women [38]. It should be considered, however, that only one patient was homozygous for the minor C allele of CLOCK_3111 (rs1801260), genotype CC. Twelve patients had the TC genotype and another six were homozygous in TT. The evening rise in LDL-C was linked to the CLOCK_3111 (rs1801260) TT genotype; KW-H (1;18) = 5.500; p = 0.019, Figure 5. Only carriers of the TT genotype had an increase in LDL-C MEG, with higher values at 20:00 than at 08:00. Such an increase was not evident in carriers of the TC genotype who tended to have a lower LDL-C MEG. There was no interaction between CLOCK_3111 TC polymorphism and glaucoma progression; F (1, 14) = 0.002, p = 0.967, Supplementary Materials Figure S1, indicating that both factors, TT genotype and RGC loss, are independently associated, or even potentiate the increase in LDL-C MEG.

3. Discussion

Lipid metabolism and the circadian machinery are closely interrelated. Disruption of circadian rhythms in glaucoma is caused by progressive damage to RGCs [18,19,20,39,40,41], particularly to intrinsically photosensitive retinal ganglion cells, ipRGCs [22,42]. Altered lipids were repeatedly shown to be associated with glaucoma [36,37] and commonly considered as one of the putative causative co-factors. However, an alternate concept can be proposed, linking altered lipid metabolism with compromised light perception and concomitant circadian misalignment. Indeed, several recent works demonstrated that circadian disruption due to compromised light perception, or diminished amplitude of circadian light signaling may affect metabolism [1,15,43,44]. RGC loss in glaucoma diminishes the amount of daylight perceived and transferred to the relevant brain regions, including the SCN. Our results reported herein suggest that changes in serum lipids could be integrated into a vicious circle caused by circadian disruptions due to glaucomatous damage to RGCs [21]. One may assume a causal relationship between progressively impaired daylight photic signaling and glaucoma progression and specific alterations of lipid metabolism, since changes in light perception may influence circadian lipid metabolism that may involve, or not involve changes in daily food consumption. Dimmer diurnal light, similarly to light at night, reduces the amplitude of ambient light, the main circadian synchronizer, thereby weakening circadian entrainment and altering lipid metabolism. Indeed, circadian disruption is caused by clock gene mutations [1,45,46], or changes in ambient light conditions [1,43,44], which have numerous metabolic consequences. These studies suggest that diminished amplitude of light signaling between day and night, including dim light at night, may cause lipid metabolism alteration resembling what we found with progressive loss of RGCs in glaucoma. Contrary to light-at-night, when the circadian amplitude is diminished due to excess light when light should be avoided, in glaucoma patients, the circadian amplitude is diminished due to light deficit during the daytime. Since RGCs are necessary to convey light signals to the central circadian oscillator, their progressive loss reduces the effectiveness of the synchronizing role of circadian rhythms by the environmental light–dark cycle. In this study, changes in lipid metabolism were not only associated with RGC loss, but they also depended on their daytime pattern. Morning values of HDL-C and TG gradually increased with RGC loss. On the contrary, morning LDL-C values correlated only weakly with RGC loss. A stronger correlation was found in the evening, which was associated with a larger morning–evening gradients (MEGs). Moreover, MEGs were influenced by both RGC loss and CLOCK gene polymorphism.
Current knowledge of circadian rhythmicity of serum lipids is scarce and varies between populations and depending on study conditions. Twenty-four-hour profiles of serum lipids vary among individuals. In real-life conditions, 24 h rhythms in TC and HDL-C have a phase in the early evening (peaking around 16:00–17:00 h). A phase advance of approximately 2 h (to around 14:00–15:00) was reported after the age of 60 in healthy adults in India [47], with similar results in Spain [48], later confirmed with a higher-density sampling in the US [49]. A study in Japan found that both LDL-C and HDL-C decrease during the day, both fractions being significantly lower around midnight than after breakfast [50]. Another study conducted in the Republic of North Macedonia reported no 24 h rhythm in HDL-C [51]. The partly contradictory results may be explained by high intra-individual variability in 24 h and 12 h phasing [52] and high inter-individual [49] variability, and by differences in phenotypes of circadian patterns of lipid metabolism. Such differences may depend on the circadian phase of the intrinsic clock [6,15], which governs sleep and food consumption, and therefore must either directly or indirectly affect circadian profiles of lipid metabolism. Of note, postprandial responses of serum lipids to the same meal depend on time, with the effect in the morning higher than in the afternoon [14]. Furthermore, altered lipid metabolism, higher cholesterol, LDL-C [52], and atherogenic ratio (LDL-C/HDL-C) were found in evening chronotypes [53,54]. Recently, a constant routine study was conducted [15] that supported early evening mean phases for circadian rhythms of TC (18:32), LDL-C (17:00), and HDL-C (19:17). This study reported that the nocturnal phase for TG (03:22) was very close to that of melatonin (03:41) [15]. The authors also showed phase response curves (PRCs) for lipids (TC, HDL-C, and TG) in response to light and food, with greater shifts for lipids compared to melatonin, approximately in antiphase to melatonin [15]. These findings provide strong evidence that ambient light drives circadian patterns and phases of serum lipids. Interestingly, this study also showed that, unlike other lipids, LDL-C failed to demonstrate a PRC in response to light, suggesting that the mechanisms driving LDL-C are somewhat distinct. This result is intriguing since in our study, morning LDL-C also failed to demonstrate a robust correlation with RGC loss, whereas other lipids did. Moreover, only LDL-C showed MEGs that were attributed to a certain CLOCK gene SNP.
Another source of evidence that blood lipids depend on ambient light conditions stems from studies demonstrating differences in serum lipids in photoperiodic conditions of different seasons and latitudes. For example, LDL-C, HDL-C, and its turnover by lipase enzymes have seasonal differences, depending on photoperiod or light exposure [30,55]; reviewed in [31]. There are many discrepancies, especially in TC and LDL-C concerning the season when their peak phase occurs. Gender and age also matter. However, most studies agree that the lowest values are usually seen during the summer, the season also corresponding to the highest light exposure. One study found that summer, the season with an increased light phase, is linked to lower LDL-C and higher HDL-C [55], favoring the hypothesis that the amount of light received per 24 h via the retina could be associated with bidirectional changes in cholesterol fractions. As the lowest value for LDL-C occurred in summer while that for HDL-CL occurred in winter, such reciprocal seasonal differences between LDL-C and HDL-C performed in a location with relatively narrow seasonal differences in ambient temperature (Spain) suggest that, yet again, such differences can be linked to a near 6 h difference in sunset between summer and winter.
The association of MEG in LDL-C with the CLOCK gene reported herein further strengthens the evidence that lipid metabolism is clock- and light-controlled. Numerous previous studies showed that the CLOCK gene is involved in lipid metabolism [56], and that its CLOCK_3111 TC (rs1801260) polymorphism matters particularly [38,57,58,59,60,61,62,63]. Since our study showed that CLOCK rs1801260 polymorphism accounts mainly for the differences in MEG, it may help to explain why no differences in serum lipids are found in studies relying only on morning measurements [61].
Remarkably, as far as morning values are concerned, our study reaches similar conclusions as those of a recent metanalysis, which reported considerably higher mean TC and lower mean HDL-C values in patients diagnosed with glaucoma than in patients without glaucoma, but no statistically significant difference in mean LDL-C values [37]. Common clinical practice consists of assessing lipids in the morning. Unlike other lipids, however, LDL-C is more predictive of impairment in the evening than in the morning, as shown herein. Not only in glaucoma, but also in other common pathologies affecting retinal light perception, such as in diabetic retinopathy, a lower HDL-C/LDL-C ratio was found to correlate with disease severity, assuming that light perception can be involved [63]. Furthermore, in a transgenic mouse model of neurodegenerative pathology (Alzheimer’s disease), the diminished amplitude of circadian light signaling was associated with a higher amyloid load, whilst strong robust signaling correlated with a reduced amyloid load [64]. These results suggest that altered light perception and circadian disruption can facilitate a vicious cycle in the progression of neurodegenerative pathology that may include glaucoma [21]. Note that CLOCK gene rs1801260 polymorphism, yet again, can be involved [65].
Alterations to photic signaling and transduction cause disruption of circadian rhythms, the severity of which depends on impairment of ipRGCs, and melatonin production can also be affected by its receptor gene polymorphisms [19,21]. The fact that when visual function is lost, photic signaling is still transferred to the central clock prompted the discovery of ipRGCs [66,67,68]. Studies in totally blind people revealed that circadian rhythms of melatonin and cortisol were not equally compromised when light perception was not possible. Lockley and al. [69] described that 23% of individuals with no light perception remained entrained, and even more (37%) in another study [70], while the majority was non-entrained or had abnormal phase positions [69,70]. Individual differences may be either due to genetic polymorphisms in clock, clock-controlled, or melatonin receptors’ genes, or to differences in non-photic cues that likely include food consumption. Since loss of light perception affects pineal and pituitary functions, down-streaming hormones are also compromised [71,72], leading to the occurrence of complex metabolic consequences. No statistically significant associations between lipids and parameters of salivary melatonin were found in our study. This result is likely due to the modest number of patients involved and the lack of lipid determinations during the nocturnal phase of the 24 h cycle. This study did not specifically address damage to ipRGCs, which is its limitation. Our findings of pronounced alterations that occur simultaneously in lipid metabolism, circadian rhythms, and sleep, specifically in patients with advanced glaucoma, however, are in good agreement with findings of Obara et al. [42] showing that specific damage to ipRGCs appears in advanced but not in mild stages of glaucoma.
This study was primarily observational in design. Therefore, patients were free to follow their habitual sleep–wake schedules, a design feature that could affect results. However, the meal regimen was standardized in this study, suggesting that MEG differences are not derived from individual differences in diet or meal timing. Implementing circadian research for applied clinical purposes is important for translational circadian medicine [73,74]. This study is just one of this kind. Since light and feeding contribute to circadian alignment, further in-depth studies are needed to assess their roles. Light, being a principal synchronizer, can also modulate mealtimes. Circadian misalignment between feeding and clock affects anabolic–catabolic balance, including insulin sensitivity, and inflammation [75]. Further studies should also include feeding- and light-controlled protocols to obtain a more complete picture of interrelations within the vicious cycle of compromised light perception and altered metabolism in glaucoma and other diseases in which light perception is altered. It is known that circadian clocks are prone to be delayed due to reduced light signaling [25] that indeed occurs with RGC loss in glaucoma [19,20,21]. The question of whether changes in the circadian machinery of lipid metabolism can be fostered either directly by light signaling, or indirectly by means of changes in habitual diet, is thus pertinent. Both scenarios can be linked to the CLOCK gene. Whether accumulated daylight debt associates with impaired lipid metabolism in glaucoma is another question awaiting investigation.

4. Materials and Methods

This cross-sectional study adhered to the tenets of the Declaration of Helsinki and was approved by the Institutional Review Board at the Tyumen Scientific Center of the Siberian branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences (Protocol No. 5, 15 May 2013). The work was included in the research plan of the Federal State Budgetary Institution of Science at the Tyumen Scientific Center of the Siberian branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences (registration number AAAA-A17-117120500038-2). Written informed consent was obtained from all participants according to the order of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation, No. 266 (19 March 2003). All patients were examined and diagnosed under the supervision of the State Autonomous Health Institution of the Tyumen Region “Regional Ophthalmological Dispensary” during 2013–2016. The current findings are based on data from a previously published cross-sectional study [17,19,20].

4.1. POAG Diagnosis and Progression Criteria

The criteria for selecting patients with POAG were visual acuity 0.5–1.0 (without correction or with correction requiring no more than ±3.0 diopters, and no more than 1 diopter for astigmatism), a transparent lens, and no pathology of the macular region of the retina. The dynamics of visual functions were assumed to have stabilized in patients with a change in mean deviation (mD) and visual field sensitivity deviation from normal values of peers with unaltered vision by no more than 0.5 decibels (dB) per year, and a decrease in GLV of no more than 2% per year. These patients were assigned to the stable group, S-POAG. In other cases, the process was considered progressive, and patients were assigned to the advanced group, A-POAG. Data from the worst eye were considered for group assignment. Patients with S-POAG and A-POAG were matched by gender, age, and treatment. Exclusion criteria were described previously [17,19,20].

4.2. RGC Damage Assessment

Standard automated perimetry (SAP) was performed to assess visual field (VF) with the Humphrey Field Analyzer (Carl Zeiss, Jena, Germany), using the 30-2 SITA-Standard strategy. The following parameters were obtained: total photosensitivity of the central VF, mean deviation (mD), and pattern standard deviation (PSD). Damage to the retinal ganglion cell complex (RGCC) was measured by means of high-definition optical coherence tomography (HD-OCT) (RTVue-100, Optovue, 2800 Bayview Dr, Fremont, CA, USA). The average amount of GCC loss over the entire GCC map (global loss volume, GLV, %) and the average amount of localized thinning over the entire GCC map (focal loss volume, FLV, %) were estimated. Optic nerve head (ONH) and retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) scanning protocols 3.45 were used, GCC for the RTVue-100 tomograph. Depending on two-eye mean RGC GLV%, four groups were formed: 1. GLV = 1–5%; 2: GLV = 5–10%, GLV = 15–25%; and GLV > 25%. There were no patients with two-eye mean GLV% between 10 and 15%.

4.3. Plasma Lipid Assessment

Blood samples were collected while patients were admitted at a daytime patient facility. Samples of venous blood were collected three times a day, at 08:00, 14:00, and 20:00. Total cholesterol (TC), high-density lipid cholesterol (HDL-C), and triglycerides (TG) were assessed photometrically by Cormay kit (Łomianki, Poland) on a semiautomatic analyzer (Cormay, Łomianki, Poland). Low-density lipid cholesterol (LDL-C) was estimated by Friedewald’s formula [76] as TG were below 4.5 mmol/L in all samples. As one patient failed to complete sample collection, data from 114 patients were included for analysis. Daytime mean (DM) corresponded to the individual average of the three consecutive serum lipid measurements (08:00–14:00–20:00). A standardized meal regimen was applied in this study: 20:30, a day before the study (recommendation): 100 g low-fat cottage cheese, 200 g oatmeal jelly); study day (served): 8:30: two eggs, unsweetened tea; 14:30: 100 g chicken breast, 100 g buckwheat porridge.

4.4. Salivary Melatonin Assessment

Fifteen volunteers were engaged in a standardized in-laboratory study [19]. Controlled lighting was used with lights-on (400 lx) from the start (10:00) until 18:00 and lights-off (<5 lx) from 18:00 to 08:00. A standardized water and food protocol was followed during these 26 h. Precautions were followed according to procedures for dim light melatonin onset (DLMO) measurements in saliva protocol [77]. Saliva samples were taken around the clock starting at 14:00 (at 14:00, 17:00, 20:00, 22:00, hourly from 22:00 to 04:00, at 06:00 and 10:00). The protocol is described in more detail elsewhere [19].

4.5. Genotyping

Genotyping was always performed by the same operator, who was not aware of the participant’s clinical characteristics. Saliva samples were collected via standard protocols from nineteen patients as described elsewhere [17,19]. Polymorphic gene variants were identified by SNP (single nucleotide polymorphism) Screen Kit (Syntol; Moscow, Russia) for eight genes (clock genes: PER2 rs6431590, PER3 VNTR, CLOCK rs1801260 3111T/C, cryptochrome CRY1 rs12820777; melatonin receptor genes MTNR1A rs34532313, MTNR1B rs10830963, G-protein GNB rs5443; and angiotensin converting enzyme, ACE rs1799752 insertion/deletion). In each reaction, two allele-specific hybridizations were used to detect two alleles of the studied polymorphism, independently on two fluorescence channels (ROX and FAM).

4.6. Data Analysis

Multiple linear regression and stepwise forward and backward analyses were applied to examine associations between serum lipids and factors related to glaucoma progression. One-way analyses of variance (ANOVA) tests for statistical differences were performed using the software packages Excel, STATISTICA 6, and SPSS 23.0. Shapiro–Wilk’s W-test was applied to check for normal distribution. When variables were normally distributed (W-test’s p-value > 0.05), a one-way ANOVA was used, with Tukey’s post hoc correction for multiple testing. Otherwise, the Kruskal–Wallis and the Mann–Whitney post hoc tests were used. Statistical comparison of correlation strength was performed with cocor free online software [78]. The level of statistical significance was set at 5%.

5. Conclusions

Herein, we present evidence for a close association of RGC loss with changes in lipid metabolism in a time-dependent manner. Progressive loss of RGCs is linked to an HDL-C and TG increase in the morning, while TC and LDL-C have a strong evening gradient and increase mainly in the evening (r = 0.533, p < 0.0001). A positive MEG (an increase in evening LDL-C) was particularly seen in a subset of POAG patients with the CLOCK_3111 TT genotype.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/app12136374/s1, Figure S1: No interaction between CLOCK_3111 TC polymorphism and glaucoma progression; F (1, 14) = 0.0018, p = 0.967.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, D.G., T.M. and D.W.; methodology, D.G., T.M., D.W., S.K. and G.C.; software, D.G. and G.C.; validation, V.N., A.N., Y.F. and T.M.; formal analysis, T.M., D.G., D.W., A.N., Y.F., S.K. and G.C.; investigation, D.G., T.M., D.W., S.K., N.Y., A.N., A.N. and Y.F.; resources, D.G., V.N., T.M. and A.N.; data curation, T.M., A.N., Y.F. and D.G.; writing—original draft preparation, D.G.; writing—review and editing, T.M., D.W., G.C. and S.K.; visualization, D.G., D.W., G.C. and D.G.; supervision, V.N. and T.M.; project administration, V.N., T.M. and D.G.; funding acquisition, D.G. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

The study was supported by West-Siberian Science and Education Center, Government of Tyumen District, Decree of 20.11.2020, No. 928-rp., and by the Russian Foundation for Basic Research (Grant No. 19-015-00329). The funding organization had no role in the design or conduct of this research. The author(s) have no proprietary or commercial interest in any materials discussed in this article.

Institutional Review Board Statement

This cross-sectional study adhered to the tenets of the Declaration of Helsinki and was approved by the Institutional Review Board at the Tyumen Scientific Center of the Siberian branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences (Protocol No. 5, 15 May 2013).

Informed Consent Statement

Written informed consent was obtained from all participants.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available on request from the corresponding author. The data are not publicly available due to privacy.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Abbreviations

A-POAGAdvanced primary open-angle glaucoma
GLVGlobal loss volume
HDL-CHigh-density lipid cholesterol
LDL-CLow-density lipid cholesterol
MEGMorning–evening gradient
POAGPrimary open-angle glaucoma
RNFLRetinal nerve fiber layer
RGCsRetinal ganglion cells
TCTotal cholesterol
TGTriglycerides
SAPStandard automated perimetry
SNPSingle nucleotide polymorphisms
S-POAGStable primary open-angle glaucoma

References

  1. Green, C.B.; Takahashi, J.S.; Bass, J. The meter of metabolism. Cell 2008, 134, 728–742. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  2. Marcheva, B.; Ramsey, K.M.; Affinati, A.; Bass, J. Clock genes and metabolic disease. J. Appl. Physiol. 2009, 107, 1638–1646. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  3. Solt, L.A.; Kojetin, D.J.; Burris, P.T. The REV-ERBs and RORs: Molecular links between circadian rhythms and lipid homeostasis. Future Med. Chem. 2011, 5, 623–638. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  4. Sahar, S.; Sassone-Corsi, P. Regulation of metabolism: The circadian clock dictates the time. Trends Endocrinol. Metab. 2012, 23, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  5. Maury, E.; Hong, H.K.; Bass, J. Circadian disruption in the pathogenesis of metabolic syndrome. Diabetes Metab. 2014, 40, 338–346. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Gnocchi, D.; Pedrelli, M.; Hurt-Camejo, E.; Parini, P. Lipids around the Clock: Focus on Circadian Rhythms and Lipid Metabolism. Biology 2015, 4, 104–132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Kumar Jha, P.; Challet, E.; Kalsbeek, A. Circadian rhythms in glucose and lipid metabolism in nocturnal and diurnal mammals. Mol. Cell. Endocrinol. 2015, 418, 74–88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Gooley, J.J. Circadian regulation of lipid metabolism. Proc. Nutr. Soc. 2016, 75, 440–450. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Potter, G.D.; Skene, D.J.; Arendt, J.; Cade, J.E.; Grant, P.J.; Hardie, L.J. Circadian Rhythm and Sleep Disruption: Causes, Metabolic Consequences, and Countermeasures. Endocr. Rev. 2016, 37, 584–608. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Poggiogalle, E.; Jamshed, H.; Peterson, C.M. Circadian regulation of glucose, lipid, and energy metabolism in humans. Metabolism 2018, 84, 11–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Cornelissen, G. Altered circadian energy metabolism and chronobiological risk factors of chronic diseases. In The Role of Functional Food Security in Global Health; Watson, R., Singh, R., Takahashi, T., Eds.; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2019; pp. 513–524. [Google Scholar]
  12. Cornelissen, G. Circadian disruption and metabolic disease risk. In Functional Foods and Nutraceuticals in Metabolic and Non-Communicable Diseases; Singh, R., Watanabe, S., Isaza, A., Eds.; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2022; pp. 513–524. [Google Scholar]
  13. Okuliarova, M.; Rumanova, V.S.; Stebelova, K.; Zeman, M. Dim Light at Night Disturbs Molecular Pathways of Lipid Metabolism. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 6919. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Kessler, K.; Gerl, M.J.; Hornemann, S.; Damm, M.; Klose, C.; Petzke, K.J.; Kemper, M.; Weber, D.; Rudovich, N.; Grune, T.; et al. Shotgun Lipidomics Discovered Diurnal Regulation of Lipid Metabolism Linked to Insulin Sensitivity in Nondiabetic Men. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2020, 105, dgz176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Kent, B.A.; Rahman, S.A.; Hilaire, M.A., St.; Grant, L.K.; Rüger, M.; Czeisler, C.A.; Lockley, S.W. Circadian lipid and hepatic protein rhythms shift with a phase response curve different than melatonin. Nat. Commun. 2022, 13, 681. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Sihota, R.; Saxena, R.; Gogoi, M.; Sood, A.; Gulati, V.; Pandey, R.M. A comparison of the circadian rhythm of intraocular pressure in primary phronic angle closure glaucoma, primary open angle glaucoma and normal eyes. Indian J. Ophthalmol. 2005, 53, 243–247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Neroev, V.; Malishevskaya, T.; Weinert, D.; Astakhov, S.; Kolomeichuk, S.; Cornelissen, G.; Kabitskaya, Y.; Boiko, E.; Nemtsova, I.; Gubin, D. Disruption of 24-Hour Rhythm in Intraocular Pressure Correlates with Retinal Ganglion Cell Loss in Glaucoma. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 22, 359. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Drouyer, E.; Dkhissi-Benyahya, O.; Chiquet, C.; WoldeMussie, E.; Ruiz, G.; Wheeler, L.A.; Denis, P.; Cooper, H.M. Glaucoma alters the circadian timing system. PLoS ONE 2008, 3, e3931. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Gubin, D.; Neroev, V.; Malishevskaya, T.; Cornelissen, G.; Astakhov, S.Y.; Kolomeichuk, S.; Yuzhakova, N.; Kabitskaya, Y.; Weinert, D. Melatonin mitigates disrupted circadian rhythms, lowers intraocular pressure, and improves retinal ganglion cells function in glaucoma. J. Pineal Res. 2021, 70, e12730. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Gubin, D.G.; Malishevskaya, T.N.; Astakhov, Y.S.; Astakhov, S.Y.; Cornelissen, G.; Kuznetsov, V.A.; Weinert, D. Progressive retinal ganglion cell loss in primary open-angle glaucoma is associated with temperature circadian rhythm phase delay and compromised sleep. Chronobiol. Int. 2019, 36, 564–577. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Gubin, D.; Weinert, D. Melatonin, circadian rhythms and glaucoma: Current perspective. Neural Regen. Res. 2022, 17, 1759–1760. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Gracitelli, C.P.; Duque-Chica, G.L.; Roizenblatt, M.; Moura, A.L.; Nagy, B.V.; de Melo, G.R.; Borba, P.D.; Teixeira, S.H.; Tufik, S.; Ventura, D.F.; et al. Intrinsically photosensitive retinal ganglion cell activity is associated with decreased sleep quality in patients with glaucoma. Ophthalmology 2015, 122, 1139–1148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Wang, H.; Zhang, Y.; Ding, J.; Wang, N. Changes in the circadian rhythm in patients with primary glaucoma. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e62841. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  24. Wright, K.P., Jr.; McHill, A.W.; Birks, B.R.; Griffin, B.R.; Rusterholz, T.; Chinoy, E.D. Entrainment of the human circadian clock to the natural light-dark cycle. Curr. Biol. 2013, 23, 1554–1558. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  25. Roenneberg, T.; Merrow, M. The Circadian Clock and Human Health. Curr. Biol. 2016, 26, R432–R443. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Swaminathan, K.; Klerman, E.B.; Phillips, A.J.K. Are Individual Differences in Sleep and Circadian Timing Amplified by Use of Artificial Light Sources? J. Biol. Rhythm. 2017, 32, 165–176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Moreno, C.R.C.; Wright, K., Jr.; Skene, D.J.; Louzada, F.M. Phenotypic plasticity of circadian entrainment under a range of light conditions. Neurobiol. Sleep Circadian Rhythm. 2020, 9, 100055. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Korman, M.; Tkachev, V.; Reis, C.; Komada, Y.; Kitamura, S.; Gubin, D.; Kumar, V.; Roenneberg, T. Outdoor daylight exposure and longer sleep promote wellbeing under COVID-19 mandated restrictions. J. Sleep Res. 2022, 31, e13471. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Kawasaki, A.; Udry, M.; El Wardani, M.; Münch, M. Can Extra Daytime Light Exposure Improve Well-Being and Sleep? A Pilot Study of Patients with Glaucoma. Front. Neurol. 2021, 11, 584479. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Ockene, I.S.; Chiriboga, D.E.; Stanek, E.J., 3rd; Harmatz, M.G.; Nicolosi, R.; Well, A.D.; Freedson, P.; Merriam, P.A.; Reed, G.; Ma, Y.; et al. Seasonal variation in serum cholesterol levels: Treatment implications and possible mechanisms. Arch. Intern. Med. 2004, 164, 863–870. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Ma, X.; Yan, H.; Zhang, H.; Wang, M.; Zhang, Q.; Zhou, X. Progress in the seasonal variations of blood lipids: A mini-review. Lipids Health Dis. 2020, 19, 108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Ahlers, I.; Ahlersová, E.; Kapuriková, K.; Toropila, M.; Smajda, B. Influence of the light regimen on the circadian rhythm of serum lipids in the laboratory rat. Physiol. Bohemoslov. 1982, 31, 75–82. [Google Scholar]
  33. Fan, X.; Chen, D.; Wang, Y.; Tan, Y.; Zhao, H.; Zeng, J.; Li, Y.; Guo, X.; Qiu, H.; Gu, Y. Light intensity alters the effects of light-induced circadian disruption on glucose and lipid metabolism in mice. Am. J. Physiol. Endocrinol. Metab. 2022, 322, E1–E9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Wang, S.; Bao, X. Hyperlipidemia, Blood Lipid Level, and the Risk of Glaucoma: A Meta-Analysis. Investig. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2019, 60, 1028–1043. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  35. Betzler, B.K.; Rim, T.H.; Sabanayagam, C.; Cheung, C.M.G.; Cheng, C.Y. High-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol in Age-Related Ocular Diseases. Biomolecules 2020, 10, 645. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Pertl, L.; Mossböck, G.; Wedrich, A.; Weger, M.; Königsbrügge, O.; Silbernagel, G.; Posch, F. Triglycerides and Open Angle Glaucoma—A Meta-analysis with meta-regression. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 7829. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  37. Posch-Pertl, L.; Michelitsch, M.; Wagner, G.; Wildner, B.; Silbernagel, G.; Pregartner, G.; Wedrich, A. Cholesterol and glaucoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Acta Ophthalmol. 2022, 100, 148–158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Semenova, N.; Madaeva, I.; Kolesnikov, S.; Rychkova, L.; Bairova, T.; Darenskaya, M.; Kolesnikova, L. CLOCK 3111TT Genotype Is Associated with Increased Total Cholesterol and Low-Density Lipoprotein Levels in Menopausal Women with a Body Mass Index of at Least 25 kg/m2. Pathophysiology 2021, 28, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Pérez-Rico, C.; de la Villa, P.; Arribas-Gómez, I.; Blanco, R. Evaluation of functional integrity of the retinohypothalamic tract in advanced glaucoma using multifocal electroretinography and light-induced melatonin suppression. Exp. Eye Res. 2010, 91, 578–583. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Feigl, B.; Mattes, D.; Thomas, R.; Zele, A.J. Intrinsically photosensitive (melanopsin) retinal ganglion cell function in glaucoma. Investig. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2011, 52, 4362–4367. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  41. Kankipati, L.; Girkin, C.A.; Gamlin, P.D. The post-illumination pupil response is reduced in glaucoma patients. Investig. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2011, 52, 2287–2292. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  42. Obara, E.A.; Hannibal, J.; Heegaard, S.; Fahrenkrug, J. Loss of melanopsin-expressing retinal ganglion cells in severely staged glaucoma patients. Investig. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2016, 57, 4661–4667. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  43. Fonken, L.K.; Workman, J.L.; Walton, J.C.; Weil, Z.M.; Morris, J.S.; Haim, A.; Nelson, R.J. Light at night increases body mass by shifting the time of food intake. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2010, 107, 18664–18669. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  44. Obayashi, K.; Saeki, K.; Iwamoto, J.; Okamoto, N.; Tomioka, K.; Nezu, S.; Ikada, Y.; Kurumatani, N. Exposure to light at night, nocturnal urinary melatonin excretion, and obesity/dyslipidemia in the elderly: A cross-sectional analysis of the HEIJO-KYO study. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2013, 98, 337–344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Shi, S.Q.; Ansari, T.S.; McGuinness, O.P.; Wasserman, D.H.; Johnson, C.H. Circadian disruption leads to insulin resistance and obesity. Curr. Biol. 2013, 23, 372–381. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  46. Lin, E.; Kuo, P.H.; Liu, Y.L.; Yang, A.C.; Kao, C.F.; Tsai, S.J. Effects of circadian clock genes and health-related behavior on metabolic syndrome in a Taiwanese population: Evidence from association and interaction analysis. PLoS ONE 2017, 12, e0173861. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Singh, R.; Sharma, S.; Singh, R.K.; Cornelissen, G. Circadian Time Structure of Circulating Plasma Lipid Components in Healthy Indians of Different Age Groups. Indian J. Clin. Biochem. 2016, 31, 215–223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  48. Rivera-Coll, A.; Fuentes-Arderiu, X.; Diez-Noguera, A. Circadian rhythmic variations in serum concentrations of clinically important lipids. Clin. Chem. 1994, 40, 1549–1553. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Grant, A.D.; Wolf, G.I. Free-Living Humans Cross Cardiovascular Disease Risk Categories Due to Daily Rhythms in Cholesterol and Triglycerides. J. Circadian Rhythm. 2019, 17, 3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Miida, T.; Nakamura, Y.; Mezaki, T.; Hanyu, O.; Maruyama, S.; Horikawa, Y.; Izawa, S.; Yamada, Y.; Matsui, H.; Okada, M. LDL-cholesterol and HDL-cholesterol concentrations decrease during the day. Ann. Clin. Biochem. 2002, 39, 241–249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  51. Van Kerkhof, L.W.; Van Dycke, K.C.; Jansen, E.H.; Beekhof, P.K.; van Oostrom, C.T.; Ruskovska, T.; Velickova, N.; Kamcev, N.; Pennings, J.L.; van Steeg, H.; et al. Diurnal Variation of Hormonal and Lipid Biomarkers in a Molecular Epidemiology-Like Setting. PLoS ONE 2015, 10, e0135652. [Google Scholar]
  52. Chua, E.C.; Shui, G.; Lee, I.T.; Lau, P.; Tan, L.C.; Yeo, S.C.; Lam, B.D.; Bulchand, S.; Summers, S.A.; Puvanendran, K.; et al. Extensive diversity in circadian regulation of plasma lipids and evidence for different circadian metabolic phenotypes in humans. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2013, 110, 14468–14473. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  53. Tomizawa, A.; Nogawa, K.; Watanabe, Y.; Oishi, M.; Tanaka, K.; Sakata, K.; Suwazono, Y. Effect of circadian rhythm type on serum lipid levels in shift workers: A 5-year cohort study. Chronobiol. Int. 2019, 36, 751–757. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Kwon, Y.J.; Chung, T.H.; Lee, H.S.; Park, J.; Chung, J.Y.; Lee, B.K.; Lee, J.W. Association between circadian preference and blood lipid levels using a 1:1:1 propensity score matching analysis. J. Clin. Lipidol. 2019, 13, 645–653.e2. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Cambras, T.; Baena-Fustegueras, J.A.; Pardina, E.; Ricart-Jané, D.; Rossell, J.; Díez-Noguera, A.; Peinado-Onsurbe, J. Seasonal variation in plasma lipids and lipases in young healthy humans. Chronobiol. Int. 2017, 34, 1248–1258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Pan, X.; Zhang, Y.; Wang, L.; Hussain, M.M. Diurnal regulation of MTP and plasma triglyceride by CLOCK is mediated by SHP. Cell Metab. 2010, 12, 174–186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  57. Tsuzaki, K.; Kotani, K.; Sano, Y.; Fujiwara, S.; Takahashi, K.; Sakane, N. The association of the Clock 3111 T/C SNP with lipids and lipoproteins including small dense low-density lipoprotein: Results from the Mima study. BMC Med. Genet. 2010, 11, 150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  58. Garaulet, M.; Sánchez-Moreno, C.; Smith, C.E.; Lee, Y.C.; Nicolás, F.; Ordovás, J.M. Ghrelin, sleep reduction and evening preference: Relationships to CLOCK 3111 T/C SNP and weight loss. PLoS ONE 2011, 6, e17435. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  59. Bandín, C.; Martinez-Nicolas, A.; Ordovás, J.M.; Ros Lucas, J.A.; Castell, P.; Silvente, T.; Madrid, J.A.; Garaulet, M. Differences in circadian rhythmicity in CLOCK 3111T/C genetic variants in moderate obese women as assessed by thermometry, actimetry and body position. Int. J. Obes. 2013, 37, 1044–1050. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  60. Garcia-Rios, A.; Gomez-Delgado, F.J.; Garaulet, M.; Alcala-Diaz, J.F.; Delgado-Lista, F.J.; Marin, C.; Rangel-Zuñiga, O.A.; Rodriguez-Cantalejo, F.; Gomez-Luna, P.; Ordovas, J.M.; et al. Beneficial effect of CLOCK gene polymorphism rs1801260 in combination with low-fat diet on insulin metabolism in the patients with metabolic syndrome. Chronobiol. Int. 2014, 31, 401–408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Pagliai, G.; Sofi, F.; Dinu, M.; Sticchi, E.; Vannetti, F.; Molino Lova, R.; Ordovàs, J.M.; Gori, A.M.; Marcucci, R.; Giusti, B.; et al. CLOCK gene polymorphisms and quality of aging in a cohort of nonagenarians—The MUGELLO Study. Sci. Rep. 2019, 9, 1472. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  62. Semenova, N.; Madaeva, I.; Bairova, T.; Kolesnikov, S.; Kolesnikova, L. Lipid peroxidation depends on the clock 3111T/C gene polymorphism in menopausal women with Insomnia. Chronobiol. Int. 2019, 36, 1399–1408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Dornan, T.L.; Carter, R.D.; Bron, A.J.; Turner, R.C.; Mann, J.I. Low density lipoprotein cholesterol: An association with the severity of diabetic retinopathy. Diabetologia 1982, 22, 167–170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  64. Nagare, R.; Possidente, B.; Lagalwar, S.; Figueiro, M.G. Robust light-dark patterns and reduced amyloid load in an Alzheimer’s disease transgenic mouse model. Sci. Rep. 2020, 10, 11436. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Lou, F.; Li, M.; Ren, Y.; Luo, X.G.; Liu, N.; Li, X. CLOCK rs1801260 Polymorphism is Associated with Susceptibility to Parkinson’s Disease in a Chinese Population. Neurosci. Bull. 2017, 33, 734–736. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. Lucas, R.J.; Freedman, M.S.; Muñoz, M.; García-Fernández, J.M.; Foster, R.G. Regulation of the mammalian pineal by non-rod, non-cone, ocular photoreceptors. Science 1999, 84, 505–507. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Berson, D.M.; Dunn, F.A.; Takao, M. Phototransduction by retinal ganglion cells that set the circadian clock. Science 2002, 295, 1070–1073. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  68. Panda, S.; Provencio, I.; Tu, D.C.; Pires, S.S.; Rollag, M.D.; Castrucci, A.M.; Pletcher, M.T.; Sato, T.K.; Wiltshire, T.; Andahazy, M.; et al. Melanopsin is required for non-image-forming photic responses in blind mice. Science 2003, 301, 525–527. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  69. Lockley, S.W.; Skene, D.J.; Arendt, J.; Tabandeh, H.; Bird, A.C.; Defrance, R. Relationship between melatonin rhythms and visual loss in the blind. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 1997, 82, 3763–3770. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  70. Flynn-Evans, E.E.; Tabandeh, H.; Skene, D.J.; Lockley, S.W. Circadian Rhythm Disorders and Melatonin Production in 127 Blind Women with and without Light Perception. J. Biol. Rhythm. 2014, 29, 215–224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  71. Bellastella, A.; Pisano, G.; Iorio, S.; Pasquali, D.; Orio, F.; Venditto, T.; Sinisi, A.A. Endocrine secretions under abnormal light-dark cycles and in the blind. Horm. Res. 1998, 49, 153–157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Bellastella, A.; De Bellis, A.; Bellastella, G.; Esposito, K. Opposite influence of light and blindness on pituitary-gonadal function. Front. Endocrinol. 2014, 4, 205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  73. Cederroth, C.R.; Albrecht, U.; Bass, J.; Brown, S.A.; Dyhrfjeld-Johnsen, J.; Gachon, F.; Green, C.B.; Hastings, M.H.; Helfrich-Förster, C.; Hogenesch, J.B.; et al. Medicine in the Fourth Dimension. Cell Metab. 2019, 30, 238–250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  74. Kramer, A.; Lange, T.; Spies, C.; Finger, A.M.; Berg, D.; Oster, H. Foundations of circadian medicine. PLoS Biol. 2022, 20, e3001567. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  75. Allada, R.; Bass, J. Circadian Mechanisms in Medicine. N. Engl. J. Med. 2021, 384, 550–561. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  76. Friedewald, W.T.; Levy, R.I.; Fredrickson, D.S. Estimation of the concentration of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol in plasma, without use of the preparative ultracentrifuge. Clin. Chem. 1972, 18, 499–502. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Pandi-Perumal, S.R.; Smits, M.; Spence, W.; Srinivasan, V.; Cardinali, D.P.; Lowe, A.D.; Kayumov, L. Dim light melatonin onset (DLMO): A tool for the analysis of circadian phase in human sleep and chronobiological disorders. Prog. Neuro-Psychopharmacol. Biol. Psychiatry 2007, 31, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Diedenhofen, B.; Much, J. Cocor: A comprehensive solution for the statistical comparison of correlations. PLoS ONE 2015, 10, e0121945. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
Figure 1. Daytime means of serum lipids in glaucoma patients with different degrees of retinal ganglion cell (RGC) loss, assessed as two-eye mean global loss volume (GLV%), gauged by high-definition optical coherence tomography. n = 114; RGC GLV < 5%, n = 16; GLV = 5–10%, n = 49, GLV = 15–25%, n = 35; n > 25%, n = 14). Effects for daytime means: total cholesterol, TC: KW-H (3;114) = 54.923; p < 0.0001; triglycerides, TG: KW-H (3;114) = 47.120; p < 0.0001; HDL-C: KW-H (3;114) = 34.988; p < 0.0001; LDL-C: KW-H (3;114) = 12.762; p = 0.005. GLV%: two-eye mean RGC global loss volume. p-values for statistically significant difference between groups after Tukey’s honestly significant difference (HSD) test post-hoc are shown in red. **: p < 0.01; * p < 0.05.
Figure 1. Daytime means of serum lipids in glaucoma patients with different degrees of retinal ganglion cell (RGC) loss, assessed as two-eye mean global loss volume (GLV%), gauged by high-definition optical coherence tomography. n = 114; RGC GLV < 5%, n = 16; GLV = 5–10%, n = 49, GLV = 15–25%, n = 35; n > 25%, n = 14). Effects for daytime means: total cholesterol, TC: KW-H (3;114) = 54.923; p < 0.0001; triglycerides, TG: KW-H (3;114) = 47.120; p < 0.0001; HDL-C: KW-H (3;114) = 34.988; p < 0.0001; LDL-C: KW-H (3;114) = 12.762; p = 0.005. GLV%: two-eye mean RGC global loss volume. p-values for statistically significant difference between groups after Tukey’s honestly significant difference (HSD) test post-hoc are shown in red. **: p < 0.01; * p < 0.05.
Applsci 12 06374 g001
Figure 2. Daytime patterns of lipid metabolism in glaucoma patients with different degrees of retinal ganglion cell (RGC) loss, assessed as two-eye mean global loss volume (GLV%), gauged by high-definition optical coherence tomography. n = 114; RGC GLV < 5%, n = 16; GLV = 5–10%, n = 49, GLV = 15–25%, n = 35; n > 25%, n = 14). Effects for time–group interaction: total cholesterol: F (6, 330) = 6.267, p < 0.0001; triglycerides: F (6, 330) = 1.006, p = 0.421; high-density-lipid cholesterol, HDL-C: F (6, 330) = 0.247, p = 0.960; low-density lipid cholesterol, LDL-C: F (6, 330) = 3.351, p = 0.003. Applsci 12 06374 i001 GLV < 5%; Applsci 12 06374 i002 GLV 5–10%; Applsci 12 06374 i003 GLV 15–25%; Applsci 12 06374 i004 GLV > 25%.
Figure 2. Daytime patterns of lipid metabolism in glaucoma patients with different degrees of retinal ganglion cell (RGC) loss, assessed as two-eye mean global loss volume (GLV%), gauged by high-definition optical coherence tomography. n = 114; RGC GLV < 5%, n = 16; GLV = 5–10%, n = 49, GLV = 15–25%, n = 35; n > 25%, n = 14). Effects for time–group interaction: total cholesterol: F (6, 330) = 6.267, p < 0.0001; triglycerides: F (6, 330) = 1.006, p = 0.421; high-density-lipid cholesterol, HDL-C: F (6, 330) = 0.247, p = 0.960; low-density lipid cholesterol, LDL-C: F (6, 330) = 3.351, p = 0.003. Applsci 12 06374 i001 GLV < 5%; Applsci 12 06374 i002 GLV 5–10%; Applsci 12 06374 i003 GLV 15–25%; Applsci 12 06374 i004 GLV > 25%.
Applsci 12 06374 g002
Figure 3. Changes in serum lipids associate with retinal ganglion cell (RGC) loss (two-eye mean global loss volume, %) in glaucoma. Evening (20:00) low-density lipid cholesterol (LDL-C) correlated more strongly with GLV% than morning (08:00) LDL-C; Dunn and Clark’s z = −5.069, p < 0.0001. strongly with GLV% than morning (08:00) LDL-C; Dunn and Clark’s z = −5.069, p < 0.0001. n = 114. Applsci 12 06374 i005 TG at 08:00 (r = 0.568; p < 0.001); Applsci 12 06374 i006 TG at 20:00 (r = 0.608; p < 0.001). Applsci 12 06374 i007 HDLP at 08:00 (r = −0.613; p < 0.001); Applsci 12 06374 i008 HDL-C at 20:00 (r = −0.585; p < 0.001). Applsci 12 06374 i009 LDLP at 08:00 (r = 0.235; p = 0.012); Applsci 12 06374 i010 LDL-C at 20:00 (r = 0.533; p < 0.001).
Figure 3. Changes in serum lipids associate with retinal ganglion cell (RGC) loss (two-eye mean global loss volume, %) in glaucoma. Evening (20:00) low-density lipid cholesterol (LDL-C) correlated more strongly with GLV% than morning (08:00) LDL-C; Dunn and Clark’s z = −5.069, p < 0.0001. strongly with GLV% than morning (08:00) LDL-C; Dunn and Clark’s z = −5.069, p < 0.0001. n = 114. Applsci 12 06374 i005 TG at 08:00 (r = 0.568; p < 0.001); Applsci 12 06374 i006 TG at 20:00 (r = 0.608; p < 0.001). Applsci 12 06374 i007 HDLP at 08:00 (r = −0.613; p < 0.001); Applsci 12 06374 i008 HDL-C at 20:00 (r = −0.585; p < 0.001). Applsci 12 06374 i009 LDLP at 08:00 (r = 0.235; p = 0.012); Applsci 12 06374 i010 LDL-C at 20:00 (r = 0.533; p < 0.001).
Applsci 12 06374 g003
Figure 4. Morning–evening gradients (MEGs) of total cholesterol (TC, left) and low-density lipid cholesterol (LDL-C, right) depended on retinal ganglion cells global volume loss (GLV%). n = 114; RGC GLV < 5%, n = 16; GLV = 5–10%, n = 49, GLV = 15–25%, n = 35; n > 25%, n = 14). Note that MEG was decreasing in individuals with GLV% lower than 10% and changed sign to increasing in individuals with RGC GLV of 15% or more; LDL-C MEGs increased further in patients with GLV% above 25%. TC: KW-H (3;114) = 71.776; p < 0.0001; LDL-C: KW-H (3;114) = 41.933; p < 0.0001. GLV%: two-eye mean retinal ganglion cells’ global loss volume. p-values are in red for the differences between groups after adjustment for Tukey’s Honestly Significant Difference (HSD) post-hoc test. **: p < 0.01; * p < 0.05. Median; Applsci 12 06374 i011 25–75%; Applsci 12 06374 i012 Non-Outlier Range.
Figure 4. Morning–evening gradients (MEGs) of total cholesterol (TC, left) and low-density lipid cholesterol (LDL-C, right) depended on retinal ganglion cells global volume loss (GLV%). n = 114; RGC GLV < 5%, n = 16; GLV = 5–10%, n = 49, GLV = 15–25%, n = 35; n > 25%, n = 14). Note that MEG was decreasing in individuals with GLV% lower than 10% and changed sign to increasing in individuals with RGC GLV of 15% or more; LDL-C MEGs increased further in patients with GLV% above 25%. TC: KW-H (3;114) = 71.776; p < 0.0001; LDL-C: KW-H (3;114) = 41.933; p < 0.0001. GLV%: two-eye mean retinal ganglion cells’ global loss volume. p-values are in red for the differences between groups after adjustment for Tukey’s Honestly Significant Difference (HSD) post-hoc test. **: p < 0.01; * p < 0.05. Median; Applsci 12 06374 i011 25–75%; Applsci 12 06374 i012 Non-Outlier Range.
Applsci 12 06374 g004
Figure 5. Evening rise in low-density lipid cholesterol, LDL-C was linked to CLOCK_3111 (rs1801260) TT genotype. Kruskal–Wallis, KW-H (1;18) = 5.500; p = 0.019. n = 18.; TC = 12; TT = 6 *: p < 0.05.
Figure 5. Evening rise in low-density lipid cholesterol, LDL-C was linked to CLOCK_3111 (rs1801260) TT genotype. Kruskal–Wallis, KW-H (1;18) = 5.500; p = 0.019. n = 18.; TC = 12; TT = 6 *: p < 0.05.
Applsci 12 06374 g005
Table 1. Linear regression and multiple stepwise regression model of daytime lipids as a function of retinal ganglion cell damage and age.
Table 1. Linear regression and multiple stepwise regression model of daytime lipids as a function of retinal ganglion cell damage and age.
Dependent
Variable
GLV, r ValueAge, r ValueAll-Effects Multiple Regression Model,
b-Value(s)
Backward Stepwise Regression Model,
b-Value(s)
Morning (08:00)
Cholesterol0.5260.365GLV, b = 0.458
Age, b = 0.231
GLV, b = 0.526
TG0.5680.120GLV, b = 0.583
Age, b = −0.050
GLV, b = 0.568
HDL-C−0.613−0.083GLV, b = −0.640
Age, b = 0.104
GLV, b = −0.610
LDL-C0.2350.294Age, b = 0.247
GLV, b = 0.163
Age, b = 0.294
Evening (20:00)
Cholesterol0.7740.350GLV, b = 0.734
Age, b = 0.137
GLV, b = 0.774
TG0.6080.017GLV, b = 0.659
Age, b = −0.170
GLV, b = 0.608
HDL-C−0.585−0.070GLV, b = −0.620
Age, b = 0.109
GLV, b = 0.580
LDL-C0.5330.403GLV, b = 0.454
Age, b = 0.271
GLV, b = 0.454
Age, b = 0.271
Morning–Evening Gradients (MEGs)
Cholesterol0.7210.185GLV, b = 0.728
Age, b = −0.030
GLV, b = 0.720
TG0.323−0.201GLV, b = 0.417
Age, b = −0.320
GLV, b = 0.417
Age, b = −0.320
HDL-C−0.0490.013GLV, b = −0.060
Age, b = 0.029
---
LDL-C0.5580.297GLV, b = 0.514
Age, b = 0.147
GLV, b = 0.557
GLV—retinal ganglion cells’ global loss volume, %; TG—triglycerides; HDL-C—high-density-lipid cholesterol; LDL-C—low-density lipid cholesterol. n = 114. Significant correlations are bold. ---: no significant associations for HDL-C with MEGs.
Table 2. Morning–evening gradients (MEGs) of low-density lipid cholesterol (LDL-C) depended on studied polymorphic variants of the biological clock, melatonin receptors, and G-protein genes in primary-open glaucoma patients (n = 19). Significant correlations are bold.
Table 2. Morning–evening gradients (MEGs) of low-density lipid cholesterol (LDL-C) depended on studied polymorphic variants of the biological clock, melatonin receptors, and G-protein genes in primary-open glaucoma patients (n = 19). Significant correlations are bold.
Gene Polymorphismsp-Value for Effect Significance; ANOVA for LDL-C MEG
CLOCK rs1801260 3111T/C0.023
PER2 rs64315900.507
PER3 VNTR0.644
CRY1 rs128207770.169
MTNR1A rs345323130.656
MTNR1B rs108309630.338
GNB rs54430.814
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Gubin, D.; Neroev, V.; Malishevskaya, T.; Kolomeichuk, S.; Weinert, D.; Yuzhakova, N.; Nelaeva, A.; Filippova, Y.; Cornelissen, G. Daytime Lipid Metabolism Modulated by CLOCK Gene Is Linked to Retinal Ganglion Cells Damage in Glaucoma. Appl. Sci. 2022, 12, 6374. https://doi.org/10.3390/app12136374

AMA Style

Gubin D, Neroev V, Malishevskaya T, Kolomeichuk S, Weinert D, Yuzhakova N, Nelaeva A, Filippova Y, Cornelissen G. Daytime Lipid Metabolism Modulated by CLOCK Gene Is Linked to Retinal Ganglion Cells Damage in Glaucoma. Applied Sciences. 2022; 12(13):6374. https://doi.org/10.3390/app12136374

Chicago/Turabian Style

Gubin, Denis, Vladimir Neroev, Tatyana Malishevskaya, Sergey Kolomeichuk, Dietmar Weinert, Natalya Yuzhakova, Alsu Nelaeva, Yulia Filippova, and Germaine Cornelissen. 2022. "Daytime Lipid Metabolism Modulated by CLOCK Gene Is Linked to Retinal Ganglion Cells Damage in Glaucoma" Applied Sciences 12, no. 13: 6374. https://doi.org/10.3390/app12136374

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop