Next Article in Journal
Analysis on High-Power Seaport LED Luminaire with Uniform Light Distribution Based on Optimized Lens and Heatsink
Next Article in Special Issue
Effect of a Training Program on Hepatic Fat Content and Cardiometabolic Risk in Postmenopausal Women: The Randomized Controlled Trial
Previous Article in Journal
Decision Tree Method for Fault Causes Classification Based on RMS-DWT Analysis in 275 kV Transmission Lines Network
Previous Article in Special Issue
Effect of PEMF on Muscle Oxygenation during Cycling: A Single-Blind Controlled Pilot Study
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Applied Sciences
Volume 11
Issue 9
10.3390/app11094033
Review Report
applsci-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles
Article
Peer-Review Record

Antagonist Muscle Co-Activation during Kettlebell Single Arm Swing Exercise

Appl. Sci. 2021, 11(9), 4033; https://doi.org/10.3390/app11094033
by Ahmed Salem 1, Amr Hassan 2, Markus Tilp 3 and Abdel-Rahman Akl 4,*
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Reviewer 3: Anonymous
Appl. Sci. 2021, 11(9), 4033; https://doi.org/10.3390/app11094033
Submission received: 4 March 2021 / Revised: 11 April 2021 / Accepted: 23 April 2021 / Published: 29 April 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Biomechanical and Physiological Performance in Sports)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

In the abstract it is suggested to replace the term ...nine players with participants or study participants that attended

Abstract and Material and Methods: Concerning anthropometric data (body mass and height) measurement accuracy will not allow to present data with two decimal places.

Measurement procedure for anthropometric measurement has to prescribed in detail im Material and Methods section (and measurement accuray of the individual measurements has to be provided).

In previous studies it was determined that increases in movement velocity and acceleration led to an increase in EMG signal amplitude could you prescribe how movement velocity and acceleration was controlled in the two phases compared.

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Reviewer 2 Report

Overall you had a very good paper. Your introduction and methods were very sound. The results section well organized. I would like you to add more to the discussion on the application aspect of this study. How can the results improve the practical application of strength and conditioning and sports rehabilitation professions. Also, there were a few sentences that needed editing due to unclarity or spelling errors (lines 44, 69, 174)

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Reviewer 3 Report

The subject of the article is very interesting and suitable for publication in Applied Sciences. However, I suggest you include some minor comments:

Line 17, 18 Page1, I suggests an explanation of the shortcuts used: AD/PD, ESL/RA, ESI/EO, GM/RF, EMG. Shortcuts are explained later on, but this is not clear in the abstract.

Line 277, Page 10, He suggests redrafting the conclusions. In my opinion, there are too few of them and there are no specific results that were presented in the manuscript.

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Back to TopTop