Next Article in Journal
Hsp60 Quantification in Human Gastric Mucosa Shows Differences between Pathologies with Various Degrees of Proliferation and Malignancy Grade
Next Article in Special Issue
A Simple Approach for Counting CD4+ T Cells Based on a Combination of Magnetic Activated Cell Sorting and Automated Cell Counting Methods
Previous Article in Journal
Nitrogen Removal Using a Membrane Bioreactor with Rubber Particles as the Fouling Reducer
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

A Novel Magnetic Respiratory Sensor for Human Healthcare

1
Department of Physics, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL 33620, USA
2
Phenikaa University Nano Institute (PHENA), Phenikaa University, Hanoi 12116, Vietnam
3
Graduate University of Science and Technology (GUST), Vietnam Academy of Science and Technology, 18 Hoang Quoc Viet, Hanoi 12116, Vietnam
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Appl. Sci. 2021, 11(8), 3585; https://doi.org/10.3390/app11083585
Submission received: 25 February 2021 / Revised: 1 April 2021 / Accepted: 11 April 2021 / Published: 16 April 2021

Abstract

:

Featured Application

A magnetic respiratory sensor can be potentially employed to identify respiratory-related diseases like COVID-19 and track its progress in real time.

Abstract

Breathing is vital to life. Therefore, the real-time monitoring of a patient′s breathing pattern is crucial to respiratory rehabilitation therapies, such as magnetic resonance exams for respiratory-triggered imaging, chronic pulmonary disease treatment, and synchronized functional electrical stimulation. While numerous respiratory devices have been developed, they are often in direct contact with a patient, which can yield limited data. In this study, we developed a novel, non-invasive, and contactless magnetic sensing platform that can precisely monitor a patient′s breathing, movement, or sleep patterns, thus providing efficient monitoring at a clinic or home. A magneto-LC resonance (MLCR) sensor converts the magnetic oscillations generated by a patient′s breathing into an impedance spectrum, which allows for a deep analysis of one′s breath variation to identify respiratory-related diseases like COVID-19. Owing to its ultrahigh sensitivity, the MLCR sensor yields a distinct breathing pattern for each patient tested. It also provides an accurate measure of the strength of a patient′s breath at multiple stages as well as anomalous variations in respiratory rate and amplitude. The sensor can thus be applied to detect symptoms of COVID-19 in a patient, due to shortness of breath or difficulty breathing, as well as track the disease′s progress in real time.

1. Introduction

Bacteria and viruses threaten our lives on a daily basis and are responsible for severe plagues. To prevent further infection, it is essential to develop high-performance healthcare monitoring devices that can detect a pathogen and provide accurate health condition data and progress [1,2]. For instance, the development of novel respiratory devices to monitor breathing has advanced healthcare service, especially for those experiencing asthma or chronic obstructive pulmonary diseases.
In December 2019, the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), also known as COVID-19, began to spread across the globe and has since caused the suffering and loss of life of millions of people [3,4]. This deadly virus has a structure similar to severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) and is highly contagious, as it can spread from one person to another through air [5]. To limit the spread of COVID-19 and to help doctors in clinical decision making, it is critical to have fast screening and real-time monitoring of symptoms and growth at all stages (early, intermediate, and severe). Although detecting and tracking COVID-19 represents an incredibly challenging task, recent efforts have been devoted to achieving this ultimate goal [6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14].
One well-known method to detect the virus is based on the reverse transcriptase quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR) [6,7]. By collecting samples from subjects and using the reverse transcriptase enzyme, a complementary viral DNA (cDNA) is created from the RNA of the virus. Some portions of cDNA go through a polymerase chain reaction and can thus be detected after an amplification process [8]. Another method for detecting COVID-19 uses an electronic sensor. A field-effect transistor (FET), which can bind to COVID-19, has been developed, and real-time changes to the electric signal have been demonstrated [9]. Optical biosensors and biochemical tests have also been employed to detect this deadly virus [10,11,12]. Despite the advantages they provide, these sensors are vulnerable to human contact and inaccuracy with small amounts of samples and usually have long processing times [13].
Common symptoms of COVID-19 include (i) shortness of breath or difficulty breathing, (ii) cough, and (iii) fever. Some patients suffer symptoms similar to lung disease, such as pneumonia [5]. During the infection period, a patient likely experiences shortness of breath or difficulty breathing, which can be detected using a real-time respiratory monitoring device [15,16,17]. Current respiratory monitoring techniques are based on the impedance pneumography of respiratory inductance plethysmography (RIP). By attaching electrodes to a patient′s chest, the expansion and contraction of the chest causes a change in electrical impedance that can be expressed as the motion of respiration [16]. However, this contact-based method comes with limited sensitivity and reliability, as it usually interferes with natural breathing and requires additional devices for analysis [17]. It is also an inconvenient method to perform actual tests, such as children′s respiratory monitoring. Therefore, there is an urgent need for the development of contactless devices that enable early and fast detection of COVID-19, or related diseases, and track their growth rates in real time.
In this paper, we present a novel, non-invasive, and contactless magnetic sensing platform that integrates an ultrasensitive magneto-LC resonance (MLCR) sensor with a tiny permanent magnet for applications in healthcare monitoring. We demonstrate how to use this sensing platform to monitor respiratory motion (frequency, amplitude, shortness of breath, etc.) in real time and analyze patients′ breathing patterns at different ages, multiple stages, after holding their breath, and in both wake-up and sleep modes. Based on these findings, we propose an innovative approach that integrates magnetic sensing with machine learning for the fast screening and real-time tracking of COVID-19 and related viruses.

2. Materials and Methods

The MLCR sensor that utilizes the advantages of the giant magneto-impedance (GMI) effect of an ultrasoft magnetic Co-rich microwire [18], and an LC resonance circuit of an inductive coil made of the Co-rich microwire, has recently been developed by our group for real-time respiratory monitoring [19] and for spintronics applications [20]. Details of the design and fabrication of the MLCR sensor have been reported in Ref. [19]. In this study, we aimed to optimize the sensing capacity of the MLCR sensor. To do so, we performed a systematic investigation on the sensitivity of the MLCR sensor as a function of the operation frequency and the distance between the sensor and the targeted sensing object. To determine the optimized operation frequency and distance from the MMC sensor to a tiny permanent magnet, a vibrator with a non-magnetic arm was used. The waveform driving the vibrator was a sinusoidal wave with 0.1 Hz frequency and 3.3 V amplitude, which was 0.5 cm from top to bottom. Change in the external magnetic field, due to vibration of the permanent magnet, drives a change in the impedance of the MLCR sensor, corresponding to the highest and lowest peaks, which is defined as the sensitivity of the MLCR sensor (i.e., sensitivity, ΔZ = ZhZl, where Zh and Zl are the highest and lowest values of impedance, respectively). It should be noticed herein that the initial value of impedance, Z, was automatically set by the impedance analyzer. Since we consider changes in Z a result of breathing (e.g., the breath amplitude) and breathing pattern variations (e.g., the respiratory rate, abnormal breathings), this initial impedance value does not affect test results reported in this paper. Figure 1a displays a typical vibrating (or breathing) pattern measured by the MLCR sensor, as it detects the magnetic signal of a vibrating permanent magnet that was located 5 cm away from the sensor. By studying the effect of variation of operation frequency from 60 to 140 MHz on the sensor’s sensitivity, we found the optimal operation frequency of 80 MHz to achieve the highest sensitivity (see Figure 1b). Using this optimal operation frequency, we investigated the effect of changing the distance between the sensor and the permanent magnet on the sensor sensitivity and found that the 5 cm distance is optimal for magnetic respiratory monitoring using the MLCR sensor (see Figure 1c). Therefore, in the thesis research, we operated the MLCR sensor at f = 80 MHz and placed it at d = 5 cm from the permanent magnet for all breathing monitoring experiments.
To examine the sensing capacity and consistency of the MLCR sensor in monitoring human respiratory motion in real time, we designed experiments with the sensor held on a non-magnetic arm at a distance of 5 cm away from a tiny permanent magnet (e.g., NdFeB) mounted to the skin of a test subject. As the test subject breathes in and out, the chest will rise and fall, which generates a corresponding magnetic field change of the permanent magnet, tracked by the MLCR. In other words, the motion of the permanent magnet is converted into an impedance change of the MLCR sensor. To perform human respiratory motion tests, we designed a comfortable test configuration, as illustrated in Figure 1d. In this sensor, the sensing element consists of an ultrasoft magnetic Co-rich microwire coil (the inset of Figure 1d) that enables the sensing of magnetic fields at magnitudes as small as a pT.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Real-Time Monitoring of Human Respiratory Motion at Different Ages

Research has shown that respiratory rate varies considerably with age [21,22,23,24,25,26,27]. For instance, an infant (1–12 moths) breathes between 30 and 60 times per minute, toddlers (1–2 years) breathe anywhere from 24 to 40 times per minute, and preschoolers (3–5 years) breathe between 22 and 34 times per minute. School-aged children (6–18 years) breathe anywhere from 18 to 30 times per minute, while an adult (18–35 years) breathes between 12 and 18 times per minute. Elderly people (>50 years) have respiratory rates between 16 and 25 breaths per minute. A respiratory rate of more than 25 breaths per minute may indicate a respiratory issue, such as tachypnea [26,27].
Therefore, it is essential to examine if the magnetic respiratory device can precisely monitor and distinguish breathing patterns of people at different ages. The tests were performed on three volunteered subjects (a, b, c) of ages 30, 36, and 42 years old (YO). The results shown in Figure 2a–c indicate that the 30 YO breathed the strongest and at a rate of 13 times per minute. The 36 YO breathed 15 times per minute and the 42 YO breathed 17 times per minute. The tests were repeated several times and showed reproducible and consistent results (see Figure 2d–f). These results demonstrate that each person has a characteristic breathing pattern. When one gets older, they breathe weaker, and their number of breaths per minute (the respiratory rate) increases. This finding is consistent with those reported in previous works [21,22,23,24,25,26,27]. It is also worth noting in Figure 2a–c that the breath amplitude, which is proportional to the change in impedance due to breathing (defined as ΔZ = ZhZl), of subject 2 is significantly lower than those of the other two (subjects 1 and 3). This could reveal a respiratory issue associated with this person, which also appears to be in line with the other test results presented below.
Shortness of breath or abnormal breathing is noticed near t = 20 s for the 30 YO, between 20 and 40 s for the 36 YO, and at 35 and 45 s for the 42 YO, in Figure 2a–c. To gain more information from these features, we analyzed the peak-to-peak time and plotted it as a function of time. As one can see in Figure 3a–c, there are some abnormal changes in the breathing pattern at the previously mentioned times. Such features of abnormal breathing or shortness of breath are not detectable by an Apple Watch tracker or a commercially available respiratory monitor. This demonstrates the increased capacity of our ultrasensitive magnetic respiratory device for human healthcare monitoring.

3.2. Real-Time Monitoring of Human Respiratory Motion in Multiple Breathing States

In practical applications, it is essential that a sensor be able to precisely monitor a patient′s breathing in various and complex states in real time [26,27]. Existing respiratory monitoring devices are unable to provide this information. In this study, we tested the ability of the MLCR sensor to monitor a patient′s respiratory motion in simple and complex breathing states. Subject 1 was instructed to breathe in two different states, namely, normal and deep breathing states. The MLCR sensor precisely tracked how their breath (breathing amplitude and rate) varied and transitioned from one state to another (Figure 4), which demonstrates the excellent capacity of the MLCR sensor for real-time tracking of a patient′s health progress.
It has been reported that breathing training can significantly enhance health and physical performance in humans [26]. A proper breath holding technique can increase the amount of carbon dioxide in our cells and help us to reveal personal issues we need to confront [27,28]. It has been shown that breath control improves lung function, which in turn preserves the health of stem cells and improves longevity, as well as promotes the regeneration of new tissues in the brain [29]. It has been reported that daily exercise of breath control can positively impact the sympathetic nervous system and the immune system by increasing the production of anti-inflammatory mediators [26,27,28].
In this regard, we explored the ultrahigh sensitivity of the MLCR sensor for real-time tracking of a patient’s breathing in multiple/complex states from holding breath (State 1) to the release of breath (State 2) and the return to normal breathing (State 3). A clear understanding of this complex breathing process provides valuable information of the patient′s health and may help doctors to develop an appropriate treatment plan for the patient. In our study, Subjects 2 and 3 were instructed to first hold their breath as long as they could (State 1), then release their breath (State 2), and finally come back to normal breathing (State 3). The selected test results are displayed in Figure 5.
It is worth noting in this figure that both the subjects underwent three distinguishable states, which were precisely tracked by the MLCR sensor. Subject 2 held the longest breath for 47 s (State 1) and, after releasing the breath, took 15 s to catch their breath (State 2) before returning to normal breathing (State 3). Meanwhile, Subject 3 held their longest breath for 30 s (State 1) and, after releasing the breath, took only 10 s to catch their breath (State 2) before returning to normal breathing (State 3). Compared to Subject 3, Subject 2 breathed more regularly after releasing their breath toward the normal breathing state. These findings seem to suggest that when getting older, one′s ability to hold their breath decreases to a shorter period of time, and they may experience more respiratory issues. Using this testing method, one can be aware of their current health status and be encouraged to follow an appropriate breathing control method to improve health and physical performance.

3.3. Real-Time Monitoring of Human Respiratory Motion in Wake-Up and Sleep Modes

Nowadays, many people experience insomnia, sleep difficulties, dream sleep, or chronic trouble falling asleep. According to the American Sleep Association (ASA), insomnia is the most common sleep disorder [30]. Currently, about 30 percent of American adults are faced with insomnia [30]. Insomnia can arise for various reasons such as irritability, depression or anxiety, stress from multiple work tasks, medical conditions, or mental health disorders, and it can reduce our health, work performance, and quality of life [26,30,31]. Research has shown that breathing training techniques can help us to relax, sleep, and breathe more naturally and effectively [26,31]. Before using such techniques, it is essential to understand what affects our breathing before, during, and after our sleep [31]. In this context, there is an urgent need for the development of a highly sensitive, contactless respiratory monitoring device that can precisely monitor human respiratory motion in real time in these states. Owing to its ultrahigh sensitivity, the MLCR sensor is expected to fulfil this requirement.
In this study, we examined the capacity of the MLCR sensor in monitoring a patient′s respiratory motion during sleep, as well as tracking a transition of their respiratory motion from wake-up mode to sleep mode. First, we showed how respiratory motion of a patient can be tracked in real time during sleep by the MLCR sensor. In this case, the breathing pattern of Subject 2 (36 YO) was tracked while the subject was sleeping. As one can see clearly in Figure 6, the sleeping patterns were clearly recorded. It is worth noting that abnormal breathing or a shortness of breath occurred around t = 80 s. This may suggest that this subject experiences some respiratory problems or associated diseases.
Next, we tracked how the respiratory motion of a patient (Subjects 1 and 3) changed during their wake-up or sleep period, as well as from the transition from wake to sleep mode. The breathing patterns of Subject 1 (30 YO) were continuously tracked from wake to sleep mode, the result of which is shown in Figure 7. This figure shows a clear breathing transition of the subject from the wake-up to the sleep mode. It is also worth noting that in sleep mode, the subject breathed more deeply (higher amplitude) and slowly (11 times per minute), as compared to the wake mode (12 times per minute). In a similar fashion, the breathing patterns of Subject 3 (42 YO) were continuously tracked from wake to sleep mode (see Figure 8). The sensor precisely tracked how his breath transitioned from wake to sleep mode. In sleep mode, the subject breathed more deeply (higher amplitude) and slowly (14 times per minute), as compared to the wake mode (20 times per minute). The results obtained from both Subject 1 and Subject 2 consistently pinpoint the fact that, in a normal sleep mode, one tends to relax and sleep better than during the wake mode. Relative to Subject 1, there is more of a difference in the respiratory rate between the wake and sleep mode found for Subject 3. This suggests that older people tend to relax more during sleep [31].
In addition, the ultrahigh sensitivity of the MLCR sensor enables the detection of abnormal breathing around t = 40 s in both the wake-up and sleep breathing patterns for Subject 3. This indicates that the noticed abnormal breathing is intrinsic to Subject 2 and that this subject should be aware of this potential respiratory issue or related disease (e.g., chronic pulmonary disease) and should thus perform daily breathing training/exercises to resolve it [26,31].

4. Conclusions and Future Outlooks

We have developed an innovative, contactless magnetic respiratory monitoring platform based on ultrasensitive magneto-LC resonance (MLCR) technology and a permanent magnet. This technology has been successfully applied to test human respiratory motion in real time and in different states. We demonstrated that the MLCR sensor can track a person′s breathing pattern very precisely in real time over the course of multiple states (normal breathing, holding breath, and sleeping). Owing to its ultrahigh sensitivity, the sensor yielded a distinct breathing pattern for each person tested and revealed abnormal breathing, which is superior to existing respiratory monitoring devices. We have shown that when getting older, one usually manifests weaker breathing, which is marked by an increased breathing rate. They tend to hold their breath for a shorter period of time and often experience more respiratory issues than younger people. People become more relaxed and thus breathe more regularly and slowly while sleeping as compared to the wake-up mode. Our highly sensitive magnetic respiratory monitor provides not only valuable information on a patient′s current health status, but also a novel breathing control tool for improving our health and physical performance.
Through these studies, we can also identify several exciting and important applications of our novel magnetic respiratory monitoring technology for advanced human healthcare systems. In particular, research on the practical implementation of this technique for the fast screening and real-time tracking of COVID-19, or associated viruses, is very exciting and worth pursuing. Monitoring COVID-19 patients remotely with the MLCR detector and collecting data from numerous physiological signals, with the help of machine learning, would improve clinical decision making for providers [31,32,33,34]. The Fast Fourier Transform algorithm, which converts a signal from the time domain to the frequency domain and vice versa, can be used to extract spectral features from breathing patterns. This can also be used by machine learning and other algorithms for signal processing and to provide comprehensive information on a patient′s health status and physical performance.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, M.-H.P., K.Y.H., B.M., V.D.L. and A.-T.L.; methodology, K.Y.H. and V.O.J.; software, V.O.J. and T.E.; validation, K.Y.H., B.M. and M.-H.P.; formal analysis, K.Y.H. and M.-H.P.; investigation, K.Y.H.; resources, M.-H.P.; writing—original draft preparation, K.Y.H. and M.-H.P.; writing—review and editing, K.Y.H., V.O.J., B.M., V.D.L., A.-T.L., T.E. and M.-H.P.; supervision, M.-H.P.; funding acquisition, M.-H.P. and V.D.L. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

Research at USF was supported by the Covid19 Research Project under Grant number 125300. The work was also supported by Vietnam Ministry of Science and Technology through the national-level project ĐTĐLCN.17/19.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Ethical review and approval were waived for this study, because the research presents no more than minimal risk of harm to subjects and involves no procedures for which written consent is normally required outside the research context.

Informed Consent Statement

Not required.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Lou, Z.; Wang, L.; Jiang, K.; Wei, Z.M.; Shen, G.Z. Reviews of wearable healthcare systems: Materials, devices and system integration. Mater. Sci. Eng. R Rep. 2020, 140, 100523. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Shaw-Taylor, L. An introduction to the history of infectious diseases, epidemics and the early phases of the long-run decline in mortality. Econ. Hist. Rev. 2020, 73, 19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Walls, A.C.; Park, Y.-J.; Tortorici, M.A.; Wall, A.; McGuire, A.T.; Veesler, D. Structure, Function, and Antigenicity of the SARSCoV-2 Spike Glycoprotein. Cell 2020, 181, 281–292. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Zhou, P.; Yang, X.-L.; Wang, X.-G.; Hu, B.; Zhang, L.; Zhang, W.; Si, H.-R.; Zhu, Y.; Li, B.; Huang, C.-L.; et al. A Pneumonia Outbreak Associated with a New coronavirus of probable bat origin. Nature 2020, 579, 270–273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  5. Kumar, D.; Manuel, O.; Natori, Y.; Egawa, H.; Grossi, P.; Han, S.-H.; Fernandez-Ruiz, M.; Humar, A. COVID-19: A Global Transplant Perspective on Successfully Navigating a Pandemic. Am. J. Transplant. 2020, 27, 1773–1779. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  6. Spackman, E.; Senne, D.A.; Myers, T.J.; Bulaga, L.L.; Garber, L.P.; Perdue, M.L.; Lohman, K.; Daum, L.T.; Suarez, D.L. Development of a Real-Time Reverse Transcriptase PCR Assay for Type A Influenza Virus and the Avian H5 and H7 Hemagglutinin Subtypes. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2002, 40, 3256–3260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Wu, J.; Liu, J.; Li, S.; Peng, Z.; Xiao, Z.; Wang, X.; Yan, R.; Luo, J. Detection and Analysis of Nucleic Acid in Various Biological Samples of COVID-19 Patients. Travel Med. Infect. Dis. 2020, 37, 101673. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Marras, S.A. Selection of Fluorophore and Quencher Pairs for Fluorescent Nucleic Acid Hybridization Probes. Methods Mol. Biol. 2006, 335, 3–16. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  9. Seo, G.; Lee, G.; Kim, M.J.; Baek, S.-H.; Choi, M.; Ku, K.B.; Lee, C.-S.; Jun, S.; Park, D.; Kim, H.G.; et al. Detection of COVID-19 Causative Virus (SARS-CoV-2) in Human Nasopharyngeal Swab Specimens Using Field-Effect Transistor-Based Biosensor. ACS Nano 2020, 14, 5135–5142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  10. Maier, S.A. Plasmonics: Fundamentals and Applications; Springer Science & Business Media: New York, NY, USA, 2007; pp. 6–10. [Google Scholar]
  11. Ligler, F.S.; Breimer, M.; Golden, J.P.; Nivens, D.A.; Dodson, J.P.; Green, T.M.; Haders, D.P.; Sadik, O.A. Integrating Waveguide Biosensor. Anal. Chem. 2002, 74, 713–719. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. To, K.K.-W.; Tsang, O.T.-Y.; Leung, W.-S.; Tam, A.R.; Wu, T.-C.; Lung, D.C.; Yip, C.; Cai, J.-P.; Chan, J.M.-C.; Chik, T.S.-H.; et al. Temporal Profiles of Viral Load in Posterior Oropharyngeal Saliva Samples and Serum Antibody Responses During Infection by SARS-CoV-2: An Observational Cohort Study. Lancet Infect. Dis. 2020, 20, 565–574. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  13. Bhalla, N.; Pan, Y.; Yang, Z.; Farokh Payam, A. Opportunities and Challenges for Biosensors and Nanoscale Analytical Tools for Pandemics: COVID-19. ACS Nano 2020, 14, 7783–7807. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Medhi, R.; Srinoi, P.; Ngo, N.; Tran, H.V.; Lee, T.R. Nanoparticle-Based Strategies to Combat COVID-19. ACS Appl. Nano Mater. 2020, 3, 8557–8580. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Braun, S.R. Respiratory rate and pattern. In Clinical Method: The History, Physical, and Laboratory Examinations, 4th ed.; Walker, H.K., Hall, W.D., Hurst, J.W., Eds.; Butterworths: Boston, MA, USA, 1990; pp. 226–230. [Google Scholar]
  16. Hess, D.R.; MacIntyre, N.R.; Galvin, W.F. Respiratory Care: Principles and Practice, 3rd ed.; Jones & Bartlett Learning: Burlington, MA, USA, 2016. [Google Scholar]
  17. Liu, H.P.; Allen, J.; Zheng, D.C.; Chen, F. Recent development of respiratory rate measurement technologies. Phys. Meas. 2019, 40, 07TR01. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  18. Phan, M.H.; Peng, H.X. Giant magnetoimpedance materials: Fundamentals and applications. Prog. Mater. Sci. 2008, 53, 323–420. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Thiabgoh, O.; Eggers, T.; Phan, M.H. A new contactless magneto-LC resonance technology for real-time respiratory motion monitoring. Sens. Actuators A 2017, 265, 120–126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Jimenez, V.O.; Kalappattil, V.; Eggers, T.; Bonilla, M.; Kolekar, S.; Huy, P.T.; Batzill, M.; Phan, M.H. A magnetic sensor using a 2D van der Waals ferromagnetic material. Sci. Rep. 2020, 10, 4789. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Fekr, A.R.; Janidarmian, M.; Radecka, K.; Zilic, Z. A medical cloud-based platform for respiration rate measurement and hierarchical classification of breath disorders. Sensors 2014, 14, 11204–11224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Al-Khalidi, F.Q.; Saatchi, R.; Burke, D.; Elphick, H.; Tan, S. Respiration rate monitoring methods: A review. Pediatr. Pulmonol. 2011, 46, 523–529. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  23. Padasdao, B.; Shahhaidar, E.; Stickley, C.; Boric-Lubecke, O. Electromagnetic biosensing of respiratory rate. IEEE Sens. J. 2013, 13, 4204–4211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Battista, L. A new system for continuous and remote monitoring of patients receiving home mechanical ventilation. Rev. Sci. Instrum. 2016, 87, 095105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Min, S.D.; Kim, J.K.; Shin, H.S.; Yun, Y.H.; Lee, C.K.; Lee, M. Noncontact respiration rate measurement system using an ultrasonic proximity sensor. IEEE Sens. J. 2010, 10, 1732–1739. [Google Scholar]
  26. Daiana da Costa, T.; de Fatima Fernandes Vara, M.; Santos Cristino, C.; Zoraski Zanella, T.; Nunes Nogueira Neto, G.; Nohama, P. Breathing Monitoring and Pattern Recognition with Wearable Sensors. In Wearable Devices: The Big Wave of Innovation; Nasiri, N., Ed.; IntechOpen: London, UK, 2019. [Google Scholar]
  27. Kelley, S.D.; Ramsay, M.A.E. Respiratory rate monitoring: Characterizing performance for emerging technologies. Anesth. Analg. 2014, 119, 1246–1248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Skow, R.J.; Day, T.A.; Fuller, J.E.; Bruce, C.D.; Steinback, C.D. The ins and outs of breath holding: Simple demonstrations of complex respiratory physiology. Adv. Physiol. Educ. 2015, 39, 223–231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Ocampo, A.; Carlos Izpisua Belmonte, J. SIRT7 and Stem Cell Aging: Holding Your Breath for Longevity. Science 2015, 347, 1319–1320. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  30. American Sleep Association. Available online: https://www.sleepassociation.org/ (accessed on 1 December 2020).
  31. Shan, B.; Broza, Y.Y.; Li, W.; Wang, Y.; Wu, S.; Liu, Z.Z.; Wang, J.; Gui, S.; Wang, L.; Zhang, Z.H.; et al. Multiplexed Nanomaterial-Based Sensor Array for Detection of COVID-19 in Exhaled Breath. ACS Nano 2020, 14, 12125–12132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Funari, R.; Chu, K.Y.; Shen, A.Q. Detection of antibodies against SARS-CoV-2 spike protein by gold nanospikes in an opto-microfluidic chip. Biosens. Bioelectr. 2020, 169, 112578. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Lim, R.R.X.; Bonanni, A. The potential of electrochemistry for the detection of coronavirus-induced infections. TrAC Trends Anal. Chem. 2020, 133, 116081. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Fani, M.; Zandi, M.; Soltani, S.; Abbasi, S. Future developments in biosensors for field-ready SARS-CoV-2 virus diagnostics. Biotech. Appl. Biochem. 2020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. (a) Real-time monitoring of a vibrator′s motion with a vibration frequency of 0.1 Hz and an optimal distance of 5 cm from a tiny permanent magnet. This simulates the normal breathing patterns of a patient; (b) the sensitivity of the magneto-LC resonance (MLCR) sensor versus frequency at a distance 5 cm away from a vibrating tiny permanent magnet; (c) the sensitivity of the MLCR sensor versus distance (d) for f = 80 MHz; (d) a patient lays down on a comfortable bed for real-time respiratory monitoring.
Figure 1. (a) Real-time monitoring of a vibrator′s motion with a vibration frequency of 0.1 Hz and an optimal distance of 5 cm from a tiny permanent magnet. This simulates the normal breathing patterns of a patient; (b) the sensitivity of the magneto-LC resonance (MLCR) sensor versus frequency at a distance 5 cm away from a vibrating tiny permanent magnet; (c) the sensitivity of the MLCR sensor versus distance (d) for f = 80 MHz; (d) a patient lays down on a comfortable bed for real-time respiratory monitoring.
Applsci 11 03585 g001
Figure 2. Normal breathing patterns of three subjects of ages (a) 30, (b) 36, and (c) 42 years old. (df) Tests were repeated five times and showed consistent and reproducible results in number of breaths per minute for each subject.
Figure 2. Normal breathing patterns of three subjects of ages (a) 30, (b) 36, and (c) 42 years old. (df) Tests were repeated five times and showed consistent and reproducible results in number of breaths per minute for each subject.
Applsci 11 03585 g002
Figure 3. Peak-to-peak time as a function of time for three subjects aged (a) 30, (b) 36, and (c) 42 years old. These abnormal breathing patterns are related to those seen in Figure 2.
Figure 3. Peak-to-peak time as a function of time for three subjects aged (a) 30, (b) 36, and (c) 42 years old. These abnormal breathing patterns are related to those seen in Figure 2.
Applsci 11 03585 g003
Figure 4. Breathing patterns of Subject 1 (30 years old (YO)) in normal (State 1) and deep (State 2) breathing states. The sensor provided an accurate measure of the strength of breath at these two states. An obvious breathing transition from the first to the second state is observed.
Figure 4. Breathing patterns of Subject 1 (30 years old (YO)) in normal (State 1) and deep (State 2) breathing states. The sensor provided an accurate measure of the strength of breath at these two states. An obvious breathing transition from the first to the second state is observed.
Applsci 11 03585 g004
Figure 5. Breathing patterns of subjects aged (a) 36 and (b) 42 years old at three different states; State 1: breath holding, State 2: breath releasing, and State 3: normal breathing.
Figure 5. Breathing patterns of subjects aged (a) 36 and (b) 42 years old at three different states; State 1: breath holding, State 2: breath releasing, and State 3: normal breathing.
Applsci 11 03585 g005
Figure 6. Breathing pattern of Subject 2 (36 YO) during 180 s of sleep and periodic sleeping patterns were observed.
Figure 6. Breathing pattern of Subject 2 (36 YO) during 180 s of sleep and periodic sleeping patterns were observed.
Applsci 11 03585 g006
Figure 7. (a) Breathing patterns of Subject 1 in both wake and sleep modes. An obvious transition from the wake to sleep mode was observed. (b,c) show the wake and sleep breathing patterns over 1 min.
Figure 7. (a) Breathing patterns of Subject 1 in both wake and sleep modes. An obvious transition from the wake to sleep mode was observed. (b,c) show the wake and sleep breathing patterns over 1 min.
Applsci 11 03585 g007
Figure 8. (a) Breathing patterns of Subject 3 in both wake and sleep modes. An obvious transition from the wake to the sleep mode was observed. (b,c) show the wake-up and sleep breathing patterns per 1 min.
Figure 8. (a) Breathing patterns of Subject 3 in both wake and sleep modes. An obvious transition from the wake to the sleep mode was observed. (b,c) show the wake-up and sleep breathing patterns per 1 min.
Applsci 11 03585 g008
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Hwang, K.Y.; Jimenez, V.O.; Muchharla, B.; Eggers, T.; Le, A.-T.; Lam, V.D.; Phan, M.-H. A Novel Magnetic Respiratory Sensor for Human Healthcare. Appl. Sci. 2021, 11, 3585. https://doi.org/10.3390/app11083585

AMA Style

Hwang KY, Jimenez VO, Muchharla B, Eggers T, Le A-T, Lam VD, Phan M-H. A Novel Magnetic Respiratory Sensor for Human Healthcare. Applied Sciences. 2021; 11(8):3585. https://doi.org/10.3390/app11083585

Chicago/Turabian Style

Hwang, Kee Young, Valery Ortiz Jimenez, Baleeswaraiah Muchharla, Tatiana Eggers, Anh-Tuan Le, Vu Dinh Lam, and Manh-Huong Phan. 2021. "A Novel Magnetic Respiratory Sensor for Human Healthcare" Applied Sciences 11, no. 8: 3585. https://doi.org/10.3390/app11083585

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop