Next Article in Journal
Mobile Robot Path Optimization Technique Based on Reinforcement Learning Algorithm in Warehouse Environment
Previous Article in Journal
Inverse Kinematics Data Adaptation to Non-Standard Modular Robotic Arm Consisting of Unique Rotational Modules
Previous Article in Special Issue
Strain Rate Dependent Behavior of Vinyl Nitrile Helmet Foam in Compression and Combined Compression and Shear
Article

Effect of Compressive Strain Rate on Auxetic Foam

1
Department of Engineering, Manchester Metropolitan University, Manchester M1 5GD, UK
2
Materials and Engineering Research Institute, College of Business, Technology and Engineering, Sheffield Hallam University, Sheffield S1 1WB, UK
3
Department of Mechanical Engineering, École de Technologie Supérieure, Montréal, QC H3C 1K3, Canada
4
Research Centre, Hôpital du Sacré-Cœur de Montréal, Montréal, QC H4J 1C5, Canada
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Appl. Sci. 2021, 11(3), 1207; https://doi.org/10.3390/app11031207
Received: 11 December 2020 / Revised: 15 January 2021 / Accepted: 20 January 2021 / Published: 28 January 2021
(This article belongs to the Collection Sports Equipment and Materials)
Auxetic foams have previously been shown to have benefits including higher indentation resistance than their conventional counterparts, due to their negative Poisson’s ratio, making them better at resisting penetration by concentrated loads. The Poisson’s ratio and Young’s modulus of auxetic open cell foams have rarely been measured at the high compressive strain rates typical during impacts of energy absorbing material in sporting protective equipment. Auxetic closed cell foams are less common than their open cell counterparts, and only their quasi-static characteristics have been previously reported. It is, therefore, unclear how the Poisson’s ratio of auxetic foam, and associated benefits such as increased indentation resistance shown at low strain rates, would transfer to the high strain rates expected under impact. The aim of this study was to measure the effect of strain rate on the stiffness and Poisson’s ratio of auxetic and conventional foam. Auxetic open cell and closed cell polymer foams were fabricated, then compression tested to ~80% strain at applied rates up to 200 s−1, with Poisson’s ratios obtained from optical full-field strain mapping. Open cell foam quasi-static Poisson’s ratios ranged from −2.0 to 0.4, with a narrower range of −0.1 to 0.3 for closed cell foam. Poisson’s ratios of auxetic foams approximately halved in magnitude between the minimum and maximum strain rates. Open cell foam quasi-static Young’s moduli were between 0.02 and 0.09 MPa, whereas closed cell foams Young’s moduli were ~1 MPa, which is like foam in protective equipment. The Young’s moduli of the auxetic foams approximately doubled at the highest applied strain rate of 200 s−1. View Full-Text
Keywords: protective equipment; negative Poisson’s ratio; foam; impact; PPE protective equipment; negative Poisson’s ratio; foam; impact; PPE
Show Figures

Figure 1

MDPI and ACS Style

Duncan, O.; Bailly, N.; Allen, T.; Petit, Y.; Wagnac, E.; Alderson, A. Effect of Compressive Strain Rate on Auxetic Foam. Appl. Sci. 2021, 11, 1207. https://doi.org/10.3390/app11031207

AMA Style

Duncan O, Bailly N, Allen T, Petit Y, Wagnac E, Alderson A. Effect of Compressive Strain Rate on Auxetic Foam. Applied Sciences. 2021; 11(3):1207. https://doi.org/10.3390/app11031207

Chicago/Turabian Style

Duncan, Olly, Nicolas Bailly, Tom Allen, Yvan Petit, Eric Wagnac, and Andrew Alderson. 2021. "Effect of Compressive Strain Rate on Auxetic Foam" Applied Sciences 11, no. 3: 1207. https://doi.org/10.3390/app11031207

Find Other Styles
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

1
Back to TopTop