Next Article in Journal
Fluid-Structure Interaction Analysis of Aircraft Hydraulic Pipe with Complex Constraints Based on Discrete Time Transfer Matrix Method
Next Article in Special Issue
Semantic Metadata Annotation Services in the Biomedical Domain—A Literature Review
Previous Article in Journal
Cooperative Visual Augmentation Algorithm of Intelligent Vehicle Based on Inter-Vehicle Image Fusion
Previous Article in Special Issue
DCC Terminology Service—An Automated CI/CD Pipeline for Converting Clinical and Biomedical Terminologies in Graph Format for the Swiss Personalized Health Network
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

Using the Data Quality Dashboard to Improve the EHDEN Network

Appl. Sci. 2021, 11(24), 11920; https://doi.org/10.3390/app112411920
by Clair Blacketer 1,2,3,*,†, Erica A. Voss 1,2,3,*,†, Frank DeFalco 1,3, Nigel Hughes 1,3, Martijn J. Schuemie 1,3, Maxim Moinat 2,3,4 and Peter R. Rijnbeek 2,3
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Appl. Sci. 2021, 11(24), 11920; https://doi.org/10.3390/app112411920
Submission received: 31 October 2021 / Revised: 7 December 2021 / Accepted: 8 December 2021 / Published: 15 December 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Semantic Interoperability and Applications in Healthcare)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

- The abstract should be rewritten to be suitable for the applied sciences journal. 
- The last paragraph in the introduction should summarize the article's structure.
- Modify equation 1 number.  
- What are the total number of running and the average running time?
- What is the impact of running time on the results of DQD except for the confidence in the data?
- What hardware specifications are used in the experiment?
- Table 1 shows the total number of subjects. Are these subjects similar in their structure?.  Is it possible that the high number of subjects (such as Spain) impacts the DQD results?

Author Response

Please see attachment

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 2 Report

The paper is well presented and the method proposed seems to work with different database formats.

In my opinion the authors do not provide enough background on the subject under study and the contribution (original work) should be remarked. In fact the contribution is not clear.

Author Response

Please see attachment

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Round 2

Reviewer 1 Report

I would like to thank the authors to address all the comments I suggest.

I recommend to accept the article as it.

Author Response

Thank you so much for the review. Please see attachment with the pdf version of the manuscript highlighted with changes from the first round of review. 

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Back to TopTop