Using the Data Quality Dashboard to Improve the EHDEN Network
Round 1
Reviewer 1 Report
- The abstract should be rewritten to be suitable for the applied sciences journal.
- The last paragraph in the introduction should summarize the article's structure.
- Modify equation 1 number.
- What are the total number of running and the average running time?
- What is the impact of running time on the results of DQD except for the confidence in the data?
- What hardware specifications are used in the experiment?
- Table 1 shows the total number of subjects. Are these subjects similar in their structure?. Is it possible that the high number of subjects (such as Spain) impacts the DQD results?
Author Response
Please see attachment
Author Response File: Author Response.pdf
Reviewer 2 Report
The paper is well presented and the method proposed seems to work with different database formats.
In my opinion the authors do not provide enough background on the subject under study and the contribution (original work) should be remarked. In fact the contribution is not clear.
Author Response
Please see attachment
Author Response File: Author Response.pdf
Round 2
Reviewer 1 Report
I would like to thank the authors to address all the comments I suggest.
I recommend to accept the article as it.
Author Response
Thank you so much for the review. Please see attachment with the pdf version of the manuscript highlighted with changes from the first round of review.
Author Response File: Author Response.pdf