Pain Management Using Nano-Bio Fusion Gel in Fixed Orthodontic Therapy-Induced Gingivitis: A Split-Mouth Design Study
Abstract
1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
3. Results
4. Discussion
5. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Krukemeyer, A.M.; Arruda, A.O.; Inglehart, M.R. Pain and orthodontic treatment: Patient experiences and provider assessments. Angle Orthod. 2009, 79, 1175–1181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Liu, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Wang, L.; Guo, Y.; Xiao, S. Prevalence of Porphyromonas gingivalis four rag locus genotypes in patients of orthodontic gingivitis and periodontitis. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e61028. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Lv, D.; Zhang, J.; Gu, X.; Shen, H.; Shao, S.; Hou, W.; Wang, K.; Svensson, P.; Chen, W. Transient Pain Following Orthodontic Fixed Appliances Induces Sensitization of Gingival and Periodontal Tissues. J. Oral Facial Pain Headache 2016, 30, 228–233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Qadri, T.; Bohdanecka, P.; Tunér, J.; Miranda, L.; Altamash, M.; Gustafsson, A. The importance of coherence length in laser phototherapy of gingival inflammation—A pilot study. Lasers Med. Sci. 2007, 22, 245–251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Qadri, T.; Miranda, L.; Tuner, J.; Gustafsson, A. The short-term effects of low-level lasers as adjunct therapy in the treatment of periodontal inflammation. J. Clin. Periodontol. 2005, 32, 714–719. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Morrier, J. White spot lesions and orthodontic treatment. Prevention and treatment. L’Orthodontie Fr. 2014, 85, 235–244. [Google Scholar]
- Alam, M.K.; Ganji, K.K. Nano-Bio Fusion Gingival Gel in the management of fixed orthodontic treatment-induced gingivitis: An empirical study. Am. J. Orthod. Dentofac. Orthop. 2021, 159, 808–815. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Srikanth, A.; Sathish, M.; Harsha, A.V.S. Application of ozone in the treatment of periodontal disease. J. Pharm. Bioallied Sci. 2013, 5, S89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Butera, A.; Gallo, S.; Maiorani, C.; Preda, C.; Chiesa, A.; Esposito, F.; Pascadopoli, M.; Scribante, A. Management of Gingival Bleeding in Periodontal Patients with Domiciliary Use of Toothpastes Containing Hyaluronic Acid, Lactoferrin, or Paraprobiotics: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial. Appl. Sci. 2021, 11, 8586. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Scott, P.; Sherriff, M.; DiBiase, A.T.; Cobourne, M.T. Perception of discomfort during initial orthodontic tooth alignment using a self-ligating or conventional bracket system: A randomized clinical trial. Eur. J. Orthod. 2008, 30, 227–232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Bergius, M.; Kiliaridis, S.; Berggren, U. Pain in orthodontics. J. Orofac. Orthop./Fortschr. Kieferorthopädie 2000, 61, 125–137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Feldmann, I.; List, T.; John, M.T.; Bondemark, L. Reliability of a questionnaire assessing experiences of adolescents in orthodontic treatment. Angle Orthod. 2007, 77, 311–317. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Koo, H.; Cury, J.A.; Rosalen, P.L.; Ambrosano, G.M.; Ikegaki, M.; Park, Y.K. Effect of a Mouthrinse Containing Selected Propolis on 3-Day Dental Plaque Accumulation and Polysaccharide Formation. Caries Res. 2002, 36, 445–448. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Coutinho, A. Honeybee propolis extract in periodontal treatment: A clinical and microbiological study of propolis in periodontal treatment. Indian J. Dent. Res. 2012, 23, 294. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Chatterjee, A.; Sneha, V. Evaluate the efficacy of NBF gel as an adjunct to scaling in gingivitis—A clinical study. Periodontics 2014, 20, 543–548. [Google Scholar]
- Chapple, I. Reactive oxygen species and antioxidants in inflammatory diseases. J. Clin. Periodontol. 1997, 24, 287–296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Jung, M.; Triebel, S.; Anke, T.; Richling, E.; Erkel, G. Influence of apple polyphenols on inflammatory gene expression. Mol. Nutr. Food Res. 2009, 53, 1263–1280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Tufekci, E.; Casagrande, Z.A.; Lindauer, S.J.; Fowler, C.E.; Williams, K.T. Effectiveness of an essential oil mouthrinse in improving oral health in orthodontic patients. Angle Orthod. 2008, 78, 294–298. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Oliver, R.; Knapman, Y. Attitudes to orthodontic treatment. Br. J. Orthod. 1985, 12, 179–188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Polat, O.; Karaman, A.I. Pain control during fixed orthodontic appliance therapy. Angle Orthod. 2005, 75, 214–219. [Google Scholar]
- Schlagenhauf, U.; Jockel-Schneider, Y. Probiotics in the Management of Gingivitis and Periodontitis. A Review. Front. Dent. Med. 2021, 2, 61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]

| Selection Guideline | Inclusive Class I or II or III Angle’s malocclusion. | Exclusive Craniofacial abnormalities, patient on regular medication, TMJ-dysfunction, parafunctional habits, multiple missing teeth and periodontally compromised tooth/teeth |
| Study design | Prospective-clinical-intervention. | |
| Intervention | NBFG on experimental side, twice a day after brushing for 28 days. | |
| Comparison | Placebo-gel on the control side that contains water, thickener, preservative, sorbitol and a small amount of peppermint. | |
| Outcome | PP of FOTIG | |
| Sample size calculation | With the power 80%, α 0.05 and effect size (d) 0.22 was used (G*Power-software version 3.0.10). Thus, the total sample size finalized for this study was 32. | |
| Randomization of patients into treatment and control group | A computer software program was used to code each participant for the NBFG and placebo-gel application to avoid bias. | |
| NBFG application | Initially a trained dental assistant applied the NBFG and placebo-gel followed by training of the patients by a dental assistant. The patients were instructed to follow the same protocol. | |
| Pain perception | The numerical rating scale (NRS) questionnaire was used to measure PP. The numerical scale consisted of segments ranging from 0 to 10, with 0 being “no pain” and 10 being “the worst pain imaginable”. The participants picked (verbal version) or drew a circle around (written version) the number that best describes the pain dimension, usually intensity. A trained dental assistant recorded initial baseline data (T1), immediately after case and control selection. The participants were asked to record pain on both sides (active and placebo side) using 2 sets of questionnaires at the 7th day (T2) and the 28th day (T3). In addition, telephone calls/message were made on the 7th day and the 28th day (T3) to ensure collection of data. | |
| Statistical analysis | Statistical analysis was performed using IBM SPSS Statistics version 22.0 (IBM Co., Armonk, NY, USA). The mean rank values of PP among the 2 groups were obtained by descriptive analysis. Mann–Whitney U-test was used to compare the level of PP between the 2 groups and disparities between time points, i.e., T1, T2, and T3. Spearman correlation test was used to evaluate the correlation between PP and time of application of active and placebo-gel. | |
| (n = 64) | T1 | T2 | T3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mann–Whitney U | 512 | 54 | 22 |
| Wilcoxon W | 1040 | 582 | 550 |
| Test Static | 512 | 54 | 22 |
| Standard Error | 71.49 | 72.67 | 72.80 |
| Standardized Test Statistic | 0.000 | −6.302 | −6.730 |
| Asymptotic Sig. (2-sided test) | 1.000 | <0.001 * | <0.001 * |
| n = 64 | Active Group (T1) | Active Group (T2) | Active Group (T3) | Placebo Group (T1) | Placebo Group (T2) | Placebo Group (T3) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Active group (T1) | 1 | |||||
| Active group (T2) | 0.557 ** | 1 | ||||
| Active group (T3) | 0.380 * | 0.529 ** | 1 | |||
| Placebo group (T1) | 1.000 ** | 0.557 ** | 0.380 * | 1 | ||
| Placebo group (T2) | 0.304 | 0.108 | −0.001 | 0.304 | 1 | |
| Placebo group (T3) | 0.220 | 0.096 | −0.032 | 0.220 | 0.817 ** | 1 |
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. |
© 2021 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Alam, M.K.; Ganji, K.K.; Meshari, A.; Manay, S.M.; Jamayet, N.B.; Siddiqui, A.A. Pain Management Using Nano-Bio Fusion Gel in Fixed Orthodontic Therapy-Induced Gingivitis: A Split-Mouth Design Study. Appl. Sci. 2021, 11, 11463. https://doi.org/10.3390/app112311463
Alam MK, Ganji KK, Meshari A, Manay SM, Jamayet NB, Siddiqui AA. Pain Management Using Nano-Bio Fusion Gel in Fixed Orthodontic Therapy-Induced Gingivitis: A Split-Mouth Design Study. Applied Sciences. 2021; 11(23):11463. https://doi.org/10.3390/app112311463
Chicago/Turabian StyleAlam, Mohammad Khursheed, Kiran Kumar Ganji, Alreshidi Meshari, Srinivas Munisekhar Manay, Nafij Bin Jamayet, and Ammar A Siddiqui. 2021. "Pain Management Using Nano-Bio Fusion Gel in Fixed Orthodontic Therapy-Induced Gingivitis: A Split-Mouth Design Study" Applied Sciences 11, no. 23: 11463. https://doi.org/10.3390/app112311463
APA StyleAlam, M. K., Ganji, K. K., Meshari, A., Manay, S. M., Jamayet, N. B., & Siddiqui, A. A. (2021). Pain Management Using Nano-Bio Fusion Gel in Fixed Orthodontic Therapy-Induced Gingivitis: A Split-Mouth Design Study. Applied Sciences, 11(23), 11463. https://doi.org/10.3390/app112311463

