Next Article in Journal
Production of Arthrospira (Spirulina) platensis Enriched in β-Glucans through Phosphorus Limitation
Next Article in Special Issue
Comparison between the Lagrangian and Eulerian Approach for Simulating Regular and Solitary Waves Propagation, Breaking and Run-Up
Previous Article in Journal
Rapid Transportation and Green Technology Innovation in Cities—From the View of the Industrial Collaborative Agglomeration
Previous Article in Special Issue
Direct Evaluation of the Stress Intensity Factors for the Single and Multiple Crack Problems Using the P-Version Finite Element Method and Contour Integral Method
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

Improvement of the Zienkiewicz–Zhu Error Recovery Technique Using a Patch Configuration

Appl. Sci. 2021, 11(17), 8120; https://doi.org/10.3390/app11178120
by Mohd. Ahmed 1,*, Devinder Singh 2, Saeed AlQadhi 1 and Majed A. Alrefae 3
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Appl. Sci. 2021, 11(17), 8120; https://doi.org/10.3390/app11178120
Submission received: 17 July 2021 / Revised: 29 August 2021 / Accepted: 30 August 2021 / Published: 1 September 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Element-Based Methods for the Solution of Engineering Problems)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

1 Please show the novelty in the Introduction. Also tell readers what the advantages of the algorithm are.

2 Please update the clear Figure 1. See also other unclear Figures.

3. Please check the English in full text. For example, see Table 7-9 in line 252.

Author Response

Please see the attachment

Author Response File: Author Response.doc

Reviewer 2 Report

In this manuscript an improvement of the Zienkiewicz-Zhu (ZZ) Error Recovery Technique is carried out.

The overall quality of the manuscript can be improved considering that the exposition of the content is not very brilliant.

The paper is written with a sufficient English language; hence a deep review of the text is needed.

Some aspects of the submitted paper are not very clear and must be specified or corrected. Here are reported some considerations:

  1. The Introduction is too long. It can be shortened.
  2. Review the sentence at line 45-46. It is not very clear.
  3. Review the sentence at line 103-104. It is not very clear.
  4. Line 149. Correct “y direction”.
  5. Parenthesis should be removed from the symbols within the whole text.
  6. Equation 13. Provide explanation of Ω and D.
  7. Line 161. Remove the full stop before ratio.
  8. Figure 1 and 2. Improve image resolution. Correct the (b) caption. It should be “Element Neighbourhood”.
  9. Line 197. X and y of b should be subscript.
  10. Specify in the Square plate example the finite element software adopted for the simulations.
  11. Line 299-300. Review the sentence.

As stated before, this reviewer recommend a deep review of the English language.

For all the previous reasons, the reviewer recommends Major amendments of paper for publication in Applied Sciences.

Author Response

Please see the attachment

Author Response File: Author Response.doc

Round 2

Reviewer 2 Report

The authors addressed to all reviewer's comments and the overall quality of the paper has been improved. Therefore, this reviewer suggests to accept the manuscript in the present form.

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.doc

Back to TopTop