Next Article in Journal
Optimal Techno-Economic Planning of a Smart Parking Lot—Combined Heat, Hydrogen, and Power (SPL-CHHP)-Based Microgrid in the Active Distribution Network
Next Article in Special Issue
The Influence of Nutrient Medium Composition on Escherichia coli Biofilm Development and Heterologous Protein Expression
Previous Article in Journal
Glassy Carbon Electrochemical Sensor for Gallic and Vanillic Acid Detection in Aqueous Solutions
Previous Article in Special Issue
Application of FTA Analysis for Calculation of the Probability of the Failure of the Pressure Leaching Process
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

The Determination of the Inward Leakage through the Skin–Facepiece Interface of the Protective Half-Mask

Appl. Sci. 2021, 11(17), 8042; https://doi.org/10.3390/app11178042
by Tomáš Brestovič 1, Marián Lázár 1,*, Natália Jasminská 1, Jozef Živčák 2, Radovan Hudák 2, Lukáš Tóth 1 and Romana Dobáková 1
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Reviewer 3: Anonymous
Appl. Sci. 2021, 11(17), 8042; https://doi.org/10.3390/app11178042
Submission received: 18 August 2021 / Revised: 27 August 2021 / Accepted: 28 August 2021 / Published: 30 August 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Mechanical and Biomedical Engineering in Paradigm)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

Dear Authors

The paper is very well written and the topic is interesting and important. I will agree to the publication but I would like to ask you to correct the following issues:

  1. Fig. 10 - please add the y-axis caption on the left side, not on the right side
  2. The equations no 7 and 8 have the additional number (1), please remove.
  3. Please add the full title of the project in the "funding" section

Author Response

Dear reviewer,

your comment has been accepted and incorporated into the text.

Answers: Figure 10 was corrected, similar than the unit in the equations 7 and 8. The full title of the project in the funding section was added.

Reviewer 2 Report

Dear authors:
Thank you for this very interesting article. The topic is time-relevant for today’s overall development.
 
Please, accept my comments as a suggestion for improvement: 

It is necessary to check and edit used units in the text according to SI UNITs (formal recommendation).

You can describe in detail the differences between a) and b) illustrations in Figure 3 (Page 6).

Line 90÷ 175 It is suitable to indicate the exact type of valves used in the experiment and the type of control SW.

As well as check the references and the list of references needs to be expanded.

I wish you good luck in your future academic endeavor.

Author Response

Dear reviewer,

your comment has been accepted and incorporated into the text.

Inaccuracies in unit was removed and the units in the text  was corrected according to SI UNITs (formal recommendation). For example: line 232-233. The differences between a) and b) illustrations in Figure 3 (Page 6) was added and described – line 202 – 204. Information about the exact type of valves used in the experiment and the type of control SW we indicate in lines 142, 148, 149, 173, 175. References list was expanded.

Reviewer 3 Report

This is a well presented study involving the mechanical and kinetic properties of mask air flow leakage. The manuscript is well written and the experiments well designed. I feel the quality of the graphs must be improved (remove the cross bars, increase axes thickness, use bold legends, use colors if possible) to make the article more attractive and presentable.

It would also be interesting if the authors could include a few lines about the material properties of the polymers which would help in preventing such leakage

Author Response

Dear reviewer,

your comment has been accepted and incorporated into the text.

A formal mistake in Fig. 10 was removed and the image quality has been improved. The material properties of the polymer used in experiment was added, see line 159-168.

Back to TopTop