Next Article in Journal
Structural, Morphological, and Electrochemical Performance of CeO2/NiO Nanocomposite for Supercapacitor Applications
Previous Article in Journal
An Improved Adaptive Genetic Algorithm for Two-Dimensional Rectangular Packing Problem
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Quantum Features of Atom–Field Systems in the Framework of Deformed Fields

1
Department of Mathematics and Statistics, College of Science, Taif University, P.O. Box 11099, Taif 21944, Saudi Arabia
2
Department of Mathematics, Faculty of Science, Sohag University, Sohag 82749, Egypt
3
Department of Physics, College of Science, Imam Mohammad Ibn Saud Islamic University (IMSIU), Riyadh 13318, Saudi Arabia
4
Department of Physics, College of Science, Princess Nourah bint Abdulrahman University, Riyadh 11564, Saudi Arabia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Appl. Sci. 2021, 11(1), 408; https://doi.org/10.3390/app11010408
Submission received: 5 November 2020 / Revised: 20 December 2020 / Accepted: 25 December 2020 / Published: 4 January 2021
(This article belongs to the Section Quantum Science and Technology)

Abstract

:
We propose a new kind of Schrödinger cat state introduced as a superposition of spin coherent states in the framework of noncommutative spaces. We analyze the nonclassical features for these noncommutative deformed states in terms of the main physical parameters. The physical importance of deformed states is that they provide a convenient description of a large set of laser systems. As an application, we develop the Jaynes–Cummings model by considering the interaction among atoms and cat state fields associated to deformed spin algebras. In this context, we show the dynamical behavior of the nonlocal correlation and nonclassical properties in these quantum systems.

1. Introduction

In almost all the areas of physics, the theory of coherent states (CSs) has been used after Schrödinger first built quantum states which are the closest to replicate the classical behavior [1]. Glauber was first to observe the notion of coherence linked to these physical states [2,3]. Similar states were also reinstated by Klauder [4,5], with a widely accepted view that the CSs are linked to the harmonic oscillators (HOs). Due to their vital characteristics, these CSs were simplified to other quantum systems from either a mathematical or physical perspective [6,7,8]. Gilmore [9] and Perelomov [10] separately presented CSs linked to any set, not only to the Heisenberg group for an HO. An example of an occurrence of these CSs is the spin coherent states (SCSs) connect with su ( 2 ) group. These CSs explain various systems and have several usages in statistical mechanics, quantum optics, and physics of condensed matter [6,7,8,11,12,13]. Moreover, the quantum groups have been used as a mathematical explanation of deformed Lie algebras [14] that made the construction of the deformed coherent states (DCSs) possible. The DCSs are presented as the actual expansion of the concept of CSs. A general deformation of the Glauber CSs was created [15] as connected to deformed quantum HOs. Similarly, deformation of the SCSs is created as states connected to the deformed spin algebra su q ( 2 ) [16,17]. Over the last decades, these DCSs have attracted a great attention due to their potential applications in diverse branches of the physics [18,19,20,21]. It has been shown experimentally that the real lasers, bunched, and antibunched lights provide photon distributions that can be sub-Poissonian or super-Poissonian [22,23]. On the other hand, there are interesting quantitative effects, and related states that are difficult to be prepared and detected, namely superposition quantum states displaying interference effects [24]. Such states exhibit the surprising results of the superposition principle. Furthermore, superposed and nonlinear CSs can be generated within the motion of trapped ions [25]. The lights with nonclassicality properties are actually a popular area of research, and scientists are interested in further revealing the fundamental truth of the quantum world.
In the Jaynes–Cummings model (JCM) [26], the interaction involving radiation and matter is the most effective and simplest system in quantum optics which explains the interaction of two-level atoms with an electromagnetic field. Mathematically, JCM is well described and can as well be resolved precisely [27]. Furthermore, a recent technological breakthrough that made the production of high-Q cavities possible with a possibility to scientifically understand this relatively ideal system for a Rydberg atom in a superconductor cavity [28]. Therefore, much interest has been given to the investigation of JCM and several fascinating quantum occurrences have been speculated: For example Rabi oscillations [29], revival–collapse phenomena of atomic population inversion [30], photon anti-bunching [31], squeezing of information entropy [32], and the atomic dipoles [33].
Quantum entanglement is the most important aspects that differentiate quantum mechanics from the classical correlative. It is a very important aspect that carries out a significant function in different areas of the quantum information theory, for example, quantum key distribution [34,35,36,37,38], quantum computing [39] and teleportation [40,41,42]. Hence, the classification and the quantification of the quantum entanglement have gained ample interest and became highly researched areas in the last few decades. To measure the entanglement, a series of quantifiers have been suggested, for example, concurrence [43,44], entanglement of formation [45,46] and linear entropy [47,48]. The essential question for the quantum entanglement is to analyze if a particular state of the whole system, comprising of more than one subsystem, is entangled or not and it is factorizable if it can be given as a product of the subsystem states.
The aim of this manuscript is to introduce a new kind of Schrödinger cat states using the su q ( 2 ) algebra. We investigate the nonclassical properties of these DCSs with respect to the main physical parameters, and we consider the JCM to describe the interaction among two-level atoms and cat state fields associated to su q ( 2 ) algebra. Finally, we study the dynamical behavior of quantifiers of nonclassicality and nonlocal correlation for the considered bipartite quantum system.
The paper is organized as follows. In Section 2 we describe the deformed spin algebra and its properties. In Section 3, we introduce the SCSs and new kind of cat states in the framework of deformed spin algebra. In Section 4, the physical features of these DCSs are examined through the Mandel’s parameter. Moreover, we study the interaction of a two-level atom with a field initially defined in deformed spin coherent states (DSCSs). The conclusion of this paper is given in the last section.

2. Deformed Spin Algebra

Quantized universal enveloping algebras refer to some specific deformations of Lie algebras. A considerable example is the case of deformed spin algebra (DSA), which was firstly introduced by Sklyanin [49]. Many interesting applications were developed in different areas of the physics using the bosonic realization in terms of the deformed operators, and the DSA has attracted great interest in the framework of mathematical and physical problems [50]. The generators J ± q and J z q are used to generate the su q ( 2 ) algebra with the following commutation relations,
[ J z q , J ± q ] = ± J ± q ; [ J + q , J q ] = [ 2 J z q ] q ,
where the function “[]” expresses the deformation of the algebra. In fact, by a specific choice of this function we have a particular deformation of the spin algebra. In the case [ y ] q = y we get the non-deformed algebra, and we consider the known deformation of the spin algebra for the following function [13,14]
[ y ] q = 1 q y 1 q .
A significant property in the deformation version can be obtained for a specific values of the parameter q . For q = 1 we recover the non-deformed algebra.
The generators J ± q and J z q act on the orthonormal basis of the representation space | j , m as
J z q | j , m = m | j , m , J ± q | j , m = ( [ j m ] q [ j ± m + 1 ] q ) 1 2 | j , m ± 1
with m = j , , j .
As commonly reported, it is possible to map the su q ( 2 ) operators to HO operators by using the Jordan-Schwinger map [51,52] and Holstein–Primakoff realization (HPR) [53]. These realizations can be generalized, making it possible to achieve the operators of the deformed su q ( 2 ) algebra by annihilation and creation operators of the deformed Hos. This is a significant result as it permits the deformation of the HOs to relate with the deformation of su ( 2 ) algebra [54]. For this study, the deformation of the HPR will be applied as:
J + q = a q [ 2 j N ] q , J q = [ 2 j N ] q a q , J z q = N j ,
where a q , a q denote the deformed creation and annihilation operators. These operators act on the Fock states | n as
a q + | n = [ n + 1 ] q | n + 1 , a q | n = [ n ] q | n 1 , N | n = [ n ] q | n ,
and obeying the following commutation relations
a q a q + q a q + a q = 1 , [ N , a q + ] = a q + , [ N , a q ] = a q , for 0 < q 1 .
The states | n , n = 0 , 1 , , comprise the complete orthonormal basis of the irreducible representation space.

3. Deformed Schrödinger Cat Spin Coherent States

A SCS is obtained through acting a displacement operator on the slightest weight state of the space basis [7,9]. Nevertheless, for a deformed algebra, it is not insignificant to create such an operator as the framework of the algebra is not conserved. The DSCSs are introduced as
| z , j q = N q ( | z | 2 ) E q z J + q | j , j , z C ,
where, we considered the deformed exponential
E q x = m = 0 x m [ m ] q ! , [ m ] q ! = [ m ] q [ m 1 ] q [ 1 ] q , [ 0 ] ! = 1 .
The normalization function is given by
N q ( | z | 2 ) = 1 ( 1 + | z | 2 ) q 2 j ,
where, the Newton’s deformed binomial formula is used
( x + y ) q n : = m = 0 n [ m n ] q x n m y m .
Here, the deformed binomial function is,
[ m n ] q = [ n ] q ! [ n ] q ! [ n m ] q ! for n m .
Using these formulations, the generalized spin coherent is written as:
| z , j q = ( ( 1 + | z | 2 ) q 2 j ) 1 2 m = j j ( [ j + m 2 j ] q ) 1 2 z ( m + j ) | j , m .
To examine the physical features of the deformed states, we display the basis states | j , m as a function of the Fock states | n ( | j , m | n ). To do this, we use the deformation of HPR given in Equation (4). Applying this realization, we obtain the change of variable n = j + m , which When used in Equation (11), gives the following deformed states
| z , j q = ( ( 1 + | z | 2 ) q 2 j ) 1 2 n = 0 2 j ( [ n 2 j ] q ) 1 2 z n | n .
The Klauder’s criteria for the DSCSs are widely studied in [55]. The realization of the su q ( 2 ) quantum algebra with respect to the deformed HO operators has originated loads of studies in different areas. The DSCSs have been employed to explain a sizeable group of quantum systems made from different potentials, for example, Morse, Pöschl-Teller and infinite potentials.
Let us now introduce the deformed Schrödinger cat spin states and study their statistical properties of photons. Here, we consider superposition of two DSCSs, which are often called su ( 2 ) Schrödinger cat states, and discuss the physical properties of the photon statistics. We define su ( 2 ) Schrödinger cat states as
| z , j , Φ q = N ( | z | 2 , j , Φ ) [ | z , j q + e i Φ | z , j q ] ,
where 0 Φ 2 π is an adjustable angle and the normalization constant N q ( | z | 2 , j , Φ ) is obtained from the normalization condition q z , j , Φ | z , j , Φ q = 1 ,
N q ( | z | 2 , j , Φ ) = 1 2 [ 1 + ( 1 | z | 2 ) q 2 j ( 1 + | z | 2 ) q 2 j cos Φ ] 1 2 .
The deformed cat spin states exhibit a richer structure than the non-DSCSs. We examine the physical features of these states by evaluating the Mandel’s parameter [56]. This parameter is given by
M p = ( Δ N ) 2 N N ,
where N is the mean photon number and ( Δ N ) 2 is the photon number variance. This parameter depends on z , j , q and Φ . Let’s start with the non-deformed case that corresponds to the CSs defined by Equation (13). Figure 1, displays the graph of Mandel’s M p parameter in terms of | z | for specific values of the parameters q and j . We can see from the first graph that M p < 0 for various values of the physical parameters. Interestingly, the parameter M p decreases with | z | and approaches the value −1 as | z | becomes significantly large. This shows that the DSCSs are always sub-Poissonian and they are closest to classical states (photon states with Poissonian distribution) in the case of q = 1 with small values of j .
In what follows, we consider the deformed Schrödinger cat states corresponding to Equation (14) and show their statistical properties. Figure 2 displays the variation of the Mandel’s M P parameter as a function of | z | for various values of q and Φ with j = 2 . The Mandel’s parameter is significantly affected by the value of the phase Φ . We see from the Figure 2a,c, corresponding to the cases Φ = 0 and Φ = π / 4 , the deformed Schrödinger cat states exhibit super-Poissonian and sub-Poissonian distributions. We mention an interesting property of the states, where the Mandel’s parameter depends on the values of the deformed parameter q at | z | = 0 . For the other cases where Φ = π / 2 and Φ = π , as shown in Figure 2b,d, the Mandel’s parameter of the deformed cat states satisfies M p < 0 providing the same distribution of the photons as in the case of the DSCSs.

4. Interactions of a Two-Level Atom with a Field in the Framework of su 2 ( 2 ) Algebra

We consider an atomic system relating to a single field state described as the superposition of DSCSs. Let | e and | g represent the upper state and lower state of the atom. The interaction Hamiltonian is expressed as
H ^ I = μ ( J q | e g | + J + q | g e | ) ,
where μ represents the atom–field coupling constant and J q ( J + q ) is the lowering (raising) operator in the quantized field.
We assume that the two-level atom is firstly made in the upper state and the quantized field in the deformed cat spin coherent states (DCSCSs) in the context of HPR. The principle of linear superposition is the core of quantum mechanics via the control of the features of the single states that make them less or more pronounced. Considering the initial state of the bipartite system as a product state of quantum subsystems | ψ ( 0 ) A F = | ψ ( 0 ) A | ψ ( 0 ) F . The wave function of the atom–field system is expended with respect to the states | g , n + 1 and | e , n . The atom–field state at subsequent time t is given as
| ψ ( t ) A F = n = 0 [ A e , n | e , n + A g , n + 1 | e , n + 1 ] ,
where the coefficients A g , n + 1 ( t ) and A e , n ( t ) are the probability amplitudes of the atom, which satisfy the two coupled differential equations obtained from the Schrödinger equation
i d dt A e , n ( t ) = g [ 2 j N ] q [ n + 1 ] q A g , n + 1 ( t )
i d dt A g , n + 1 ( t ) = g [ 2 j N ] q [ n + 1 ] q A e , n ( t )
The values of A g , n + 1 ( 0 ) and A e , n ( 0 ) are obtained from the preliminary requirements. According to the two-level atom dynamics, the probabilities are significant when the two-level atom is in the excited state, and these possibilities are defined by | A g , n + 1 | 2 and | A e , n | 2 for t > 0 . On this point, a measurable inversion population W was described as the difference on the probability when the atomic system is in the ground and excited state. Since the Hamiltonian operator of the atom is proportional to the operator | g g | | e e | , the population inversion is precisely the atomic energy and it is expressed as
W = Tr [ σ z ρ A ] = n = 0 ( | A e , n | 2 | A g , n + 1 | 2 ) .
To quantify the entanglement for state of the atom–field system, the von Neumann entropy is introduced, which is utilized as proper measure of the disorder and purity of a quantum state. In this work, we are going to examine the purity for the subsystem state acquired from the bipartite state expressed in Equation (17), ρ ^ A F ( t ) = | ψ ( t ) A F A F ψ ( t ) | , by making a trace over one of the subsystem space. If t = 0 , the bipartite system is in a pure state and therefore the subsystems possess the same entropy function throughout at subsequent times, i.e., S = S A ( t ) = S F ( t ) . To obtain the entanglement evolution for the bipartite system state, the quantum entropy of one subsystem was evaluated. Applying Equation (17) and S F ( t ) = Tr ( ρ ^ F ln ρ ^ F ) the degree of entanglement is obtained as a function of the factors C e , n and C g , n + 1 :
S F ( t ) = [ Δ F + ln ( Δ F + ) + Δ F ln ( Δ F ) ] ,
where
Δ F ± = 1 2 ( 1 ± ( β | β γ | γ ) 2 + 4 | β | γ | 2 ) ,
with β | β = n = 0 | A e , n | 2 , γ | γ = n = 0 | A g , n + 1 | 2 and β | γ = γ | β = n = 0 A e , n + 1 A g , n + 1 . The von Neumann entropy changes from S V = 0 for separable states to S V = 1 for maximally entangled states.
The numerical results of the population inversion when the field is initially in a DCSCS have been displayed against the dimensionless time g t in Figure 3a and Figure 4a for different values of the deformed parameter q with | z | = 1 and Φ = 0 . Figure 3a and Figure 4b is for j = 1 and j = 2 , respectively. The temporal evolution of the population inversion exhibits oscillations with probability amplitudes that depend on the values of q . Interestingly, the deformed parameter may be considered as an essential factor to control the inhibition decay of the excited state. Figure 5a indicates that the increase in the spin number j , the atomic population reveals the same structure but with fast oscillations during the time evolution.
The temporal evolution of the Mandel’s parameter is displayed in Figure 3b and Figure 4b against the dimensionless time g t for j = 1 and j = 2 , respectively, considering different values of the deformed parameter q with | z | = 1 and Φ = 0 . In general, the parameter M p exhibits oscillations that depend on the values of the spin number j and the values of the M p are very sensitive to the deformed parameter q during the dynamics. For small values of spin, the Mandel’s parameter takes negative values as the deformed parameter gets farther from one, exhibiting sub-Poissonian distribution. For the undeformed case, q 1 , we can see that the photon statistics seem to be fluctuated around super-Poissonian and sub-Poissonian distributions during the time evolution. On the other hand, when the spin number increases, the Mandel’s parameter tends to get positive values for different times, exhibiting super-Poissonian distribution of photons (see Figure 5b,d).
For an atomic system initially prepared in the upper level, the dynamical behavior of the nonlocal correlation in the atom–field system is analyzed when the quantized field is specified by a deformed spin cat state. This quantum correlation between the two-level atom and the field is generated through the interaction during the evolution. Figure 3c and Figure 4c show the dynamics of the von-Neumann entropy against the dimensionless time μ t for j = 1 and j = 2 , respectively, with respect to the values of the deformed parameter q with | z | = 1 and Φ = 0 . It seems that the von Neumann entropy makes oscillatory behavior and its value depends on the choice of the parameter q . This means that this kind of fields may help to control the degree of the entanglement for the considered JCM during the time evolution, where for some values of q , the entropy tends to attain its maximal value. On the other hand, the figures indicate that with increasing the spin number, the entropy exhibits very rapid oscillatory and for large values of the spin number j (see Figure 5c), the entropy behaves similarly to the case of superposition of the optical coherent states [42]. Finally, in Figure 6, we show the dynamical behavior of the different quantifiers for different values of the physical parameters with Φ = π / 2 . It is clear that control of the quantifiers during the time-evolution can be made by a suitable choice of the phase parameter Φ defined in the deformed cat spin states.

5. Summary

In this manuscript, we have proposed a new kind of Schrödinger cat states introduced as a superposition of SCSs in the framework of noncommutative spaces. We have examined the nonclassical features of these noncommutative deformed states in terms of the main parameters of the physical parameters. We have suggested an appropriate quantum system for generating high amount of entanglement by a convenable control of the involved parameters. We have studied the dynamical behavior of the correlation and nonclassical properties for an atom–field system, where the field is initially described by a deformed cat spin state. In fact, we have shown in detail the dynamical behavior of the atomic population, Mandel’s parameter, and entanglement in the bipartite system in terms of the deformation parameter, spin number, and phase parameter. It is known that the study of the physical properties of the interaction between the atomic and field is an important subject in quantum information and in optics. From that perspective, the obtained results show that this interaction in the presence of deformed cat spin states provide structures that are much richer than the non-deformed ones. A useful future study is the examination of the effect of decoherence in the presence of the deformed optical states for the case of open quantum system.

Author Contributions

S.A.-K.: Writing—original draft, Writing—review & eding. K.B.: Methodology, Writing-original draft, Writing-review & editing, Investigation. A.S.A.: Project ad-ministration, Visualization, Writing—review & editing. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the Deanship of Scientific Research at Princess Nourah bint Adulrahman University through the Fast-track Research Funding Program.

Acknowledgments

Taif University Researchers Supporting Project number (TURSP-2020/154), Taif University, Taif, Saudi Arabia.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest related to this article.

References

  1. Schrodinger, E. Der stetigeÜbergang von der Mikro-zurMakromechanik. Naturwissenscahften 1926, 14, 664. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Glauber, R. The quantum theory of optical coherence. Phys. Rev. 1963, 130, 2529. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Glauber, R. Coherent and incoherent states of radiation field. J. Phys. Rev. 1963, 131, 2766. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Klauder, J.R. Continuous representation theory. I. Postulates of continuous representation theory. J. Math. Phys. 1963, 4, 1055. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Klauder, J.R. Generalized relation between quantum and classical dynamics. J. Math. Phys. 1963, 4, 1058. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Klauder, J.R.; Skagertan, B.-S. Coherent States; World Scientifique: Singapore, 1985. [Google Scholar]
  7. Perelomov, A.M. Generalized Coherent States and Their Applications; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 1986. [Google Scholar]
  8. Ali, S.T.; Antoine, J.-P.; Gazeau, J.P. Coherent States, Wavelets and Their Generalizations; Springer: New York, NY, USA, 2000. [Google Scholar]
  9. Gilmore, R. Geometry of symmetrized states. Ann. Phys. 1972, 74, 391. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Berrada, K.; Abdel-Khalek, S. Entanglement of atom–field interaction for nonlinear optical fields. PhysicaE 2011, 44, 628–634. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Berrada, K.; Abdel-Khalek, S.; Ooi, C.H.R. Quantum metrology with entangled spin-coherent states of two modes. Phys. Rev. A 2012, 86, 033823. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Berrada, K. Quantum metrology with SU (1, 1) coherent states in the presence of nonlinear phase shifts. Phys. Rev. A 2013, 88, 013817. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Abdel-Khalek, S.; Berrada, K.; Ooi, C.H.R. Beam splitter entangler for nonlinear bosonic fields. Laser Phys. 2012, 22, 1449–1454. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Jimbo, M. A q-difference analogue of U (g) and the Yang-Baxter equation. Lett. Math. Phys. 1985, 10, 63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Berrada, K.; Eleuch, H. Noncommutative deformed cat states under decoherence. Phys. Rev. D 2019, 100, 016020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Juro, B. On coherent states for the simplest quantum groups. Lett. Math. Phys. 1991, 21, 51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Ellinas, D. Path integrals for quantum algebras and the classical limit. J. Phys. A 1993, 26, L543. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Ellinas, D. On coherent states and q-deformed algebras. In Proceedings of the International Symposium on Coherent States: Past, Present and Future, Oak Ridge, TN, USA, 14–17 June 1993. [Google Scholar]
  19. Scarfone, A.M.; Narayana Swamy, P. An interacting ensemble of particles in the context of quantum algebra. J. Stat. Mech. 2009, 2009, 1–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Chaturvedi, S.; Kappoor, A.K.; Sandhya, R.; Srinivasan, V. Generalized commutation relations for a single-mode oscillator. Phys. Rev. A 1991, 43, 4555. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Chiu, S.H.; Gray, R.W.; Nelson, C.A. The q-analogue quantized radiation field and its uncertainty relations. Phys. Lett. A 1992, 164, 237–242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Katriel, J.; Solomon, A.I. Lasers, nonclassical light, and deformed photon states. Phys. Rev. A 1994, 49, 5149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Si-Cong, J.S.; Hong-Yi, F. q-deformed binomial state. Phys. Rev. A 1994, 49, 2277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Yurke, B.; Stoler, D. Generating quantum mechanical superpositions of macroscopically distinguishable states via amplitude dispersion. Phys. Rev. Lett. 1986, 57, 13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. De Matos Filho, R.L.; Vogel, W. Even and odd coherent states of the motion of a trapped ion. Phys. Rev. Lett. 1996, 76, 608. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Jaynes, E.T.; Cummings, F.W. Comparison of quantum and semiclassical radiation theories with application to the beam maser. Proc. IEEE 1963, 51, 89–109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Joshi, A.; Puri, R.R. Characteristics of Rabi oscillations in the two-mode squeezed state of the field. Phys. Rev. A 1990, 42, 4336. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Yeazell, J.A.; Mallalieu, M.; Stroud, C.R., Jr. Observation of the collapse and revival of a Rydberg electronic wave packet. Phys. Rev. Lett. 1990, 64, 2007. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Eberly, J.H.; Narozhny, N.B.; Sanchez Mondragon, J.J. Periodic spontaneous collapse and revival in a simple quantum model. Phys. Rev. Lett. 1980, 44, 1383. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Knight, P.L.; Radmore, P.M. Quantum revivals of a two-level system driven by chaotic radiation. Phys. Lett. A 1982, 90, 342–346. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Short, R.; Mandel, L. Observation of sub-poissonian photon statistics. Phys. Rev. Lett. 1983, 51, 384. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Abdalla, M.S.; Obada, A.S.F.; Abdel-Khalek, S. Entropy squeezing of time dependent single-mode Jaynes–Cummings model in presence of non-linear effect. Chaos Solitons Fractals 2008, 36, 405–417. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Arvinda, P.K.; Guanhui, H. Influence of initial conditions on squeezing and anti-bunching in the Jaynes—Cummings model. Phys. C 1988, 150, 427–439. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Li, X.S.; Lin, D.L.; George, T.F.; Liu, Z.D. Squeezing of atomic variables in the one-photon and two-photon Jaynes—Cummings model. Phys. Rev. A 1989, 40, 2504. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Ekert, A.K. Quantum cryptography based on Bell’s theorem. Phys. Rev. Lett. 1991, 67, 661. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Bennett, C.H.; Brassard, G.; Mermin, N.D. Quantum cryptography without Bell’s theorem. Phys. Rev. Lett. 1992, 68, 557. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Bennett, C.H.; Bessette, F.; Brassard, G.; Salvail, L.; Smolin, J. Experimental quantum cryptography. J. Cryptol. 1992, 5, 3–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Honjo, T.; Nam, S.W.; Takesue, H.; Zhang, Q.; Kamada, H.; Nishida, Y.; Tadanaga, O.; Asobe, M.; Baek, B.; Hadfield, R.; et al. Long-distance entanglement-based quantum key distribution over optical fiber. Opt. Express 2008, 16, 19118–19126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Ekert, A.; Jozsa, R. Quantum computation and Shor’s factoring algorithm. Rev. Mod. Phys. 1996, 68, 733. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Bennett, C.H.; Brassard, G.; Crepeau, C.; Jozsa, R.; Peres, A.; Wootters, W.K. Teleporting an unknown quantum state via dual classical and Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen channels. Phys. Rev. Lett. 1993, 70, 1895. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Takesue, H.; Shellee, D.D.; Stevens, M.J.; Verma, V.; Mirin, R.P.; Nam, S.W. Quantum teleportation of an optical qutrit. Opt. Express 2015, 2, 832–835. [Google Scholar]
  42. Berrada, K.; Abdel-Khalek, S.; Ooi, C.H.R. Geometric phase and entanglement for a single qubit interacting with deformed-states superposition. Quantum Inf. Process. 2013, 12, 2177–2188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Wootters, W.K. Entanglement of formation of an arbitrary state of two qubits. Phys. Rev. Lett. 1998, 80, 2245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Uhlmann, A. Fidelity and concurrence of conjugated states. Phys. Rev. A 2000, 62, 032307. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Bennett, C.H.; Bernstein, S.; Popescu, H.J.; Schumacher, B. Concentrating partial entanglement by local operations. Phys. Rev. A 1996, 53, 2046. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Popescu, S.; Rohrlich, D. Concentrating partial entanglement by local operations. Phys. Rev. A 1997, 56, R3319. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Bose, S.; Vedral, V. Mixedness and teleportation. Phys. Rev. A 2000, 61, 040101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Wei, T.C.; Nemoto, K.; Goldbart, P.M.; Kwiat, P.G.; Munro, W.J.; Verstraete, F. Maximal entanglement versus entropy for mixed quantum states. Phys. Rev. A 2003, 67, 022110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Sklyanin, E.K. Some algebraic structures connected with the Yang-Baxter equation. Funct. Anal. Appl. 1982, 16, 26–270. [Google Scholar]
  50. De Boer, J.; Harmsze, F.; Tjin, T. Non-linear finite W-symmetries and applications in elementary systems. Phys. Rep. 1996, 272, 139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Schwinger, J. On the Quantum Theory of Angular Momentum; Biedenharn, L.C., van Dam, H., Eds.; Academic Press: New York, NY, USA, 1965. [Google Scholar]
  52. Jordan, P. Der Zusammenhang der symmetris chenunelinearen Gruppen und das Mehrkorper poblem Z. Physik 1935, 94, 531. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Holstein, T.; Primakoff, H. Field dependence of the intrinsic domain magnetization of a ferromagnet. Phys. Rev. 1940, 58, 1098. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Bonatsos, D.; Daskaloyannis, C.; Kolokotronis, P. Generalized deformed SU (2) algebra. J. Phys. A Math. Gen. 1993, 26, L871. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Berrada, K.; El Baz, M.; Hassouni, Y. Generalized spin coherent states: Construction and some physical properties. J. Stat. Phys. 2011, 142, 510. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Mandel, L.; Wolf, E. Optical Coherence and Quantum Optics; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 1995. [Google Scholar]
Figure 1. The parameter M p of the spin coherent states (SCSs) in the context of su q ( 2 )   algebra, given by Equation (11), as function of | z | for specific values of the deformed parameter q and j . (a) is for j = 1 , (b) is for j = 2 , (c) is for j = 4 , and (d) is for j = 6 . Black (solid line) corresponds to q = 1 which displays the case of SCSs, blue (dashed line) corresponds to q = 0.3 , and red (dotted-dashed line) corresponds to q = 0.8 . The values of the parameter M p are always negative in terms of | z | , q and j , displaying a sub-Poissonian distribution of photons.
Figure 1. The parameter M p of the spin coherent states (SCSs) in the context of su q ( 2 )   algebra, given by Equation (11), as function of | z | for specific values of the deformed parameter q and j . (a) is for j = 1 , (b) is for j = 2 , (c) is for j = 4 , and (d) is for j = 6 . Black (solid line) corresponds to q = 1 which displays the case of SCSs, blue (dashed line) corresponds to q = 0.3 , and red (dotted-dashed line) corresponds to q = 0.8 . The values of the parameter M p are always negative in terms of | z | , q and j , displaying a sub-Poissonian distribution of photons.
Applsci 11 00408 g001
Figure 2. The parameter M p of the SCSs in the context of su q ( 2 ) algebra, defined in Equation (13), in terms of | z | for specific values of the deformed parameter q with j = 2 . (a) is for Φ = 0 , (b) is for Φ = π / 2 , (c) is for Φ = π / 4 , and (d) is for Φ = π . Black (solid line) corresponds to q = 1 which displays the case of ordinary SCSs, blue (dashed line) corresponds to q = 0.3 , and red (dotted-dashed line) corresponds to q = 0.8 . The parameter M p is negative or positive depending of values of the physical parameters, exhibiting sub-Poissonian and super-Poissonian distribution of photons.
Figure 2. The parameter M p of the SCSs in the context of su q ( 2 ) algebra, defined in Equation (13), in terms of | z | for specific values of the deformed parameter q with j = 2 . (a) is for Φ = 0 , (b) is for Φ = π / 2 , (c) is for Φ = π / 4 , and (d) is for Φ = π . Black (solid line) corresponds to q = 1 which displays the case of ordinary SCSs, blue (dashed line) corresponds to q = 0.3 , and red (dotted-dashed line) corresponds to q = 0.8 . The parameter M p is negative or positive depending of values of the physical parameters, exhibiting sub-Poissonian and super-Poissonian distribution of photons.
Applsci 11 00408 g002
Figure 3. The dynamics of the different quantum quantifiers for specific values of the deformed parameter q with | z | = 1 , j = 1 , and Φ = 0 . (a) is for the atomic inversion, (b) is for the Mandel’s parameter and (c) is for the von Neumann entropy. Blue (solid) line corresponds to q = 1 , black (dotted-dashed) line corresponds to q = 0.3 and red (dashed) line corresponds to q = 0.8 .
Figure 3. The dynamics of the different quantum quantifiers for specific values of the deformed parameter q with | z | = 1 , j = 1 , and Φ = 0 . (a) is for the atomic inversion, (b) is for the Mandel’s parameter and (c) is for the von Neumann entropy. Blue (solid) line corresponds to q = 1 , black (dotted-dashed) line corresponds to q = 0.3 and red (dashed) line corresponds to q = 0.8 .
Applsci 11 00408 g003
Figure 4. The dynamics of the different quantum quantifiers for specific values of the deformed parameter q with | z | = 1 , j = 2 , and Φ = 0 . (a) is for the atomic inversion, (b) and Figure 5d are for the Mandel’s parameter and (c) is for the von Neumann entropy. Blue (solid) line corresponds to q = 1 , black (dotted-dashed) line corresponds to q = 0.3 and red (dashed) line corresponds to q = 0.8 .
Figure 4. The dynamics of the different quantum quantifiers for specific values of the deformed parameter q with | z | = 1 , j = 2 , and Φ = 0 . (a) is for the atomic inversion, (b) and Figure 5d are for the Mandel’s parameter and (c) is for the von Neumann entropy. Blue (solid) line corresponds to q = 1 , black (dotted-dashed) line corresponds to q = 0.3 and red (dashed) line corresponds to q = 0.8 .
Applsci 11 00408 g004
Figure 5. The dynamics of the different quantum quantifiers for specific values of the deformed parameter q with | z | = 1 , j = 6 , and Φ = 0 . (a) is for the atomic inversion, (b) and (d) are for the Mandel’s parameter, and (c) is for the von Neumann entropy. Blue (solid) line corresponds to q = 1 , black (dotted-dashed) line corresponds to q = 0.3 and red (dashed) line corresponds to q = 0.8 .
Figure 5. The dynamics of the different quantum quantifiers for specific values of the deformed parameter q with | z | = 1 , j = 6 , and Φ = 0 . (a) is for the atomic inversion, (b) and (d) are for the Mandel’s parameter, and (c) is for the von Neumann entropy. Blue (solid) line corresponds to q = 1 , black (dotted-dashed) line corresponds to q = 0.3 and red (dashed) line corresponds to q = 0.8 .
Applsci 11 00408 g005
Figure 6. The dynamics of the different quantum quantifiers for specific values of the deformed parameter q with | z | = 1 , j = 1 , and Φ = π / 2 . (a) is for the atomic inversion, (b) is for the Mandel’s parameter and (c) is for the von Neumann entropy. Blue (solid) line corresponds to q = 1 , black (dotted-dashed) corresponds to q = 0.3 and red (dashed) corresponds to q = 0.8 .
Figure 6. The dynamics of the different quantum quantifiers for specific values of the deformed parameter q with | z | = 1 , j = 1 , and Φ = π / 2 . (a) is for the atomic inversion, (b) is for the Mandel’s parameter and (c) is for the von Neumann entropy. Blue (solid) line corresponds to q = 1 , black (dotted-dashed) corresponds to q = 0.3 and red (dashed) corresponds to q = 0.8 .
Applsci 11 00408 g006
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Abdel-Khalek, S.; Berrada, K.; Altowyan, A.S. Quantum Features of Atom–Field Systems in the Framework of Deformed Fields. Appl. Sci. 2021, 11, 408. https://doi.org/10.3390/app11010408

AMA Style

Abdel-Khalek S, Berrada K, Altowyan AS. Quantum Features of Atom–Field Systems in the Framework of Deformed Fields. Applied Sciences. 2021; 11(1):408. https://doi.org/10.3390/app11010408

Chicago/Turabian Style

Abdel-Khalek, Sayed, Kamal Berrada, and Abeer S. Altowyan. 2021. "Quantum Features of Atom–Field Systems in the Framework of Deformed Fields" Applied Sciences 11, no. 1: 408. https://doi.org/10.3390/app11010408

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop