Next Article in Journal
Non-Uniform Temperature Field of Spatial Grid Structure under Construction Induced by Solar Radiation
Next Article in Special Issue
Structural Modifications in Epitaxial Graphene on SiC Following 10 keV Nitrogen Ion Implantation
Previous Article in Journal
Research on a Nonlinear Dynamic Incipient Fault Detection Method for Rolling Bearings
Previous Article in Special Issue
Raman 2D Peak Line Shape in Epigraphene on SiC
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Applied Sciences
Volume 10
Issue 7
10.3390/app10072440
applsci-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Atomic Layer Deposition of High-k Insulators on Epitaxial Graphene: A Review

by
Filippo Giannazzo
1,*,
Emanuela Schilirò
1,*,
Raffaella Lo Nigro
1,
Fabrizio Roccaforte
1 and
Rositsa Yakimova
2
1
CNR-IMM, Strada VIII, 5 95121 Catania, Italy
2
Department of Physics Chemistry and Biology, Linköping University, SE-58183 Linköping, Sweden
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Appl. Sci. 2020, 10(7), 2440; https://doi.org/10.3390/app10072440
Submission received: 7 March 2020 / Revised: 25 March 2020 / Accepted: 27 March 2020 / Published: 3 April 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Fundamentals and Recent Advances in Epitaxial Graphene on SiC)
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:

Featured Application

Graphene-based electronics and sensing.

Abstract

Due to its excellent physical properties and availability directly on a semiconductor substrate, epitaxial graphene (EG) grown on the (0001) face of hexagonal silicon carbide is a material of choice for advanced applications in electronics, metrology and sensing. The deposition of ultrathin high-k insulators on its surface is a key requirement for the fabrication of EG-based devices, and, in this context, atomic layer deposition (ALD) is the most suitable candidate to achieve uniform coating with nanometric thickness control. This paper presents an overview of the research on ALD of high-k insulators on EG, with a special emphasis on the role played by the peculiar electrical/structural properties of the EG/SiC (0001) interface in the nucleation step of the ALD process. The direct deposition of Al2O3 thin films on the pristine EG surface will be first discussed, demonstrating the critical role of monolayer EG uniformity to achieve a homogeneous Al2O3 coverage. Furthermore, the ALD of several high-k materials on EG coated with different seeding layers (oxidized metal films, directly deposited metal-oxides and self-assembled organic monolayers) or subjected to various prefunctionalization treatments (e.g., ozone or fluorine treatments) will be presented. The impact of the pretreatments and of thermal ALD growth on the defectivity and electrical properties (doping and carrier mobility) of the underlying EG will be discussed.

1. Introduction

Graphene, the two-dimensional (2D) sp2 allotropic form of carbon, has been the object of continuously increasing scientific and technological interest, starting from its first isolation in 2004 [1]. Among the different types of graphene materials considered so far, the epitaxial graphene (EG) grown by controlled high temperature graphitization of the (0001) face of hexagonal silicon carbide (6H- or 4H-SiC) [2,3,4] is a material of choice for advanced applications in electronics [5,6], high precision metrology [7] and environmental sensing [8]. The main advantage of this growth method over other commonly used approaches (such as chemical vapor deposition, CVD, on catalytic metals [9]) is the availability of high quality graphene directly on a semiconducting or semi-insulating substrate, i.e., ready for electronic devices fabrication, without the need of transfer processes [10,11] typically responsible for contaminations and damages [12,13].
Deposition of uniform ultra-thin insulators (especially high-k dielectrics) on graphene is a key step for the fabrication of graphene-based electronic devices [6,14,15,16,17]. In this context, the atomic layer deposition (ALD), owing to its sequential layer-by-layer growth mechanism [18], is the most suitable candidate to achieve a conformal growth with subnanometric control on the thickness. However, the lack of out-of-plane bonds or surface groups in the sp2 lattice of graphene typically represents the main obstacle to films nucleation in the early stage of the ALD growth. This typically results in an inhomogeneous coverage of graphene surface, although the quality of the deposited films strongly depends on the graphene synthesis method, the graphene substrate and eventual transfer processes of graphene from the native substrate to foreign ones. As an example, for defect-free graphene flakes exfoliated from graphite, ALD growth was found to occur preferentially at the edges of the flakes [19], whereas, in the case of polycrystalline graphene grown by CVD on metals and transferred to insulating substrates, the ALD nucleation typically occurs at the grain boundaries and on wrinkles [20]. Interestingly, in the specific case of EG grown by thermal decomposition of SiC (0001), uniform ALD coverage has been observed on the monolayer (1 L) EG areas, whereas inhomogeneous growth has been found on the bilayer (2 L) of few layer regions [21]. These ALD nucleation issues common to all the graphene materials are typically circumvent by adopting surface preparation protocols, consisting of chemical prefunctionalization of graphene surface to introduce reactive (sp3) sites, or by the predeposition of seed layers [22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30,31,32]. However, proper optimization of these processes is necessary in order to avoid structural damages and a degradation of graphene electronic properties.
Although the research on ALD for graphene devices integration has been recently the object of comprehensive review articles [33], to the best of our knowledge, a focused paper reviewing ALD of high-k insulators on the EG/SiC(0001) system is currently missing. This article aims to provide an overview on this topic, highlighting the specific approaches adopted to achieve uniform ALD growth in the case of EG. Section 2 provides an introduction to the peculiar structural and electrical properties of EG and its interface with the (0001) SiC substrate. Section 3 presents recent results on the direct deposition of Al2O3 thin films on the pristine EG, elucidating the key role played by the sp3 hybridized buffer layer to obtain a homogeneous Al2O3 coverage on monolayer EG. Furthermore, the ALD on EG coated with different seeding layers, including oxidized metal films [34], high-k metal oxide thin films [35], self-assembled organic monolayers [36] or spin coated graphene oxide [37], will be presented in Section 4. Different prefunctionalization treatments of EG surface by exposure to reactive gases such as ozone [38] or XeF2 [39] will be described in the Section 5. The impact of these surface preparation processes and of thermal ALD growth on the defectivity and electrical properties of the underlying graphene will be discussed. Finally, open research issues and perspectives in the field of ALD on graphene are presented in the Section 6.

2. Morphology and Interface Structure of Epitaxial Graphene on SiC (0001)

Graphene growth by thermal decomposition of hexagonal SiC relies on the interplay of three mechanisms: (i) the preferential Si sublimation from the topmost SiC layers, leaving an excess of carbon, (ii) the diffusion of these C atoms on the SiC surface and (iii) their reorganization in the 2D hexagonal graphene lattice. These mechanisms depend both on the annealing conditions (sample temperature and gas partial pressures in the chamber) and on the SiC surface termination. To date most of the studies on graphene growth have been carried out on the Si terminated (0001) face [40,41,42,43] and on the C terminated (000-1) face [40,41,42,43], due to the availability of large area SiC substrates with these orientations. Some experiments on the non-polar faces (1-100) and (11-20) have been recently reported as well [44]. Graphene films with very different structural and electronic properties (defectivity, thickness homogeneity, doping and mobility) have been obtained on these different crystal orientations, as a result of the different surface reconstructions during thermal decomposition. Multilayers of graphene rotationally disordered to each other and with respect to the substrate are typically obtained on the (000-1) face. On the contrary, monolayer or Bernal stacked few layers of graphene showing single crystalline epitaxial alignment with the SiC substrate are normally achieved on the (0001) face. This is due to the specific growth mechanism, mediated by the formation of an interfacial carbon layer, the so-called buffer layer (BL), with partial sp3 hybridization with the Si face [45]. Figure 1 schematically depicts the structure of the BL, which is covalently bonded to Si atoms of the substrate with a large density of dangling bonds, and to the topmost monolayer of graphene with Van der Walls forces. This peculiar interface structure makes EG compressively strained, and the electrostatic interaction with the dangling bonds at the BL/SiC interface is responsible for a high n-type doping (approx. 1013 cm−2) of the overlying EG [46,47].
Although thermal decomposition of the (0001) face allows a good control of the number of layers, achieving uniform 1 L graphene coverage on the entire SiC surface remains one of the main challenges in this research field. Besides having an impact on the EG electronic properties, thickness inhomogeneities of EG have also a critical impact on the nucleation of insulating films grown by ALD, as discussed in the Section 3.
The EG thickness uniformity on the (0001) face depends on the growth conditions (temperature and pressure) and on the substrate morphology, in particular the miscut angle, with better uniformity achieved for low miscut angle (nominally “on-axis”) SiC. Under the ultra-high-vacuum (UHV) condition, EG formation has been achieved at temperatures as low as 1280 °C [3], but the topography and thickness distribution of the EG film was typically very inhomogeneous (composed of submicrometer 0 L, 1 L and 2 L patches) as shown by the atomic force microscopy (AFM) and low energy electron microscopy (LEEM) maps in Figure 2a,b. On the other hand, growth in inert gas (Ar) ambient at atmospheric pressure (approx. 900 mbar) allows it to greatly reduce the Si sublimation rate, raising the EG formation temperature at values as high as T = 1650 °C [3]. As shown in Figure 2c,d, the EG grown on “nominally” on-axis SiC(0001) is commonly composed of 1 L domains on the planar (0001) SiC terraces, separated by long and narrow 2 L or 3 L EG stripes at SiC step edges. Such steps are inherent of SiC crystal and their spacing is related to the miscut angle [48]. The preferential formation of 2 L and 3 L EG at their edges is related to the enhanced Si-desorption from these locations due to the weaker bonding in the SiC matrix. Although the EG grown under these atmospheric pressure/high temperature conditions is more homogeneous than EG grown under UHV, the presence of nanometric steps in the substrate morphology and of 1 L/2 L lateral junctions localized at these steps have been shown to cause a reduction of local electrical conductivity of EG [49,50].
Further improvement in the EG thickness homogeneity have been achieved by performing thermal decomposition of nominally on-axis 4H-SiC (0001) at a temperature of 2000 °C in inert gas (Ar) at atmospheric pressure in a radio frequency (RF) heated sublimation growth reactor [4]. By using specific well-controlled growth conditions (temperature distribution in the growth cell, temperature ramping up, and base pressure) monolayer EG coverage on most of the SiC surface has been obtained [21]. Figure 3a reports a reflectance map collected on a large area (30 μm × 30 μm) of EG grown under these optimized conditions. Reflectance mapping is a straightforward method to evaluate the number of layers distribution on large area EG samples by comparing the graphene thickness dependent reflected power with that of a bare 4H-SiC substrate [51]. Here the small yellow patches, corresponding to 2 L EG regions, covered only 1.3% surface and were surrounded by 1 L EG background on the 98.7% the area. Figure 3b,c shows the AFM morphology and the corresponding phase map on a 30 μm × 30 μm sample area. The morphological image shows the typical stepped surface of 4H-SiC (0001), and the variable contrast in the phase image provides information on the variation in the number of EG layers at different positions. In particular, the small elongated patches with higher phase contrast in Figure 3c correspond to the 2 L regions in the reflectance maps in Figure 3a.
After introducing the peculiar structural and morphological properties of EG/SiC(0001), an overview of recent literature results in the ALD of high-k insulators on this material system would be provided in the next sections. Table 1 is a synoptic table including data from selected reference papers, including the specs of the EG material, the type of EG surface preparation adopted for the subsequent ALD process, the ALD growth details (precursors, temperature and number of cycles), the properties of the deposited dielectric material (thickness and uniformity), as well as the effect of the surface preparation/ALD process on the structural properties of EG.

3. Direct ALD on Pristine Epitaxial Graphene

Early studies on thermal ALD of high-k insulators (like Al2O3 or HfO2) on pristine EG samples typically resulted in a non-uniform coverage, with poor or no oxide nucleation in the vicinity of the step edges [34,38]. As an example, Speck. et al. [38] investigated direct thermal ALD of Al2O3 on EG grown at 1650 °C in Ar (p = 900 mbar) [3]. Figure 4 illustrates the morphologies of the Al2O3 films obtained after 500 ALD cycles (corresponding to 50 nm Al2O3) at different deposition temperatures of 200 °C (a), 300 °C (b) and 350 °C (c), using trimethylaluminum (TMA) as the aluminum source, and water as the oxidant.
Poor or no oxide nucleation was observed in the vicinity of the step edges. As discussed in the Section 2, samples with 1 L EG on the (0001) terraces typically exhibit 2 L or few layers EG stripes at the step edges between terraces [3]. Hence, the Al2O3 uncovered areas were associated by the authors to the presence of 2 L or few layer EG underneath. However, no clear explanation of the different ALD nucleation and growth behavior on 1 L and 2 L EG was provided. Similarly, Robinson et al. [34] reported that the direct thermal ALD of Ta2O5, and TiO2 results in non-uniform coverage of EG up to a maximum deposition temperature (300 °C). More recently, Schilirò et al. [21] employed highly uniform 1 L EG samples (>98% monolayer coverage) as substrates for direct thermal ALD of Al2O3 at a temperature of 250 °C with TMA and H2O precursors. Figure 5 shows the morphological and structural characterization of an Al2O3 film obtained after 190 deposition cycles, corresponding to a nominal film thickness of 15 nm, evaluated from the 0.08 nm/cycle deposition rate on a reference silicon substrate. Figure 5a depicts a representative morphological image by AFM on a 20 μm × 20 μm scan area. The Al2O3 film is conformal with the topography of the EG/4H-SiC surface, except for some small depressions showing the same elongated shape of the 2L graphene patches (see, for comparison, Figure 3). A high resolution cross-sectional TEM image of the as-deposited Al2O3 film is reported in Figure 5b, where the 1 L EG plus the underlying BL can be clearly identified, and the amorphous Al2O3 layer shows uniform contrast, indicating a uniform Al2O3 density. The measured Al2O3 thickness was 12 nm, which is thinner than the nominal one and was ascribed to a lower growth rate of Al2O3 on EG surface in the early stages of the deposition process.
Raman spectroscopy measurements were carried out both on the virgin EG sample and after the Al2O3 deposition, in order to evaluate the changes induced by the thermal ALD process at 250 °C on the structural quality and doping/strain of the underlying EG. Two representative Raman spectra for the two cases, respectively, are reported in Figure 5c. The characteristic G and 2D peaks of graphene exhibit single Lorentzian shape, and the FWHM of the 2D peaks in these representative spectra are consistent with the 1 L nature of EG [52]. The small changes in the positions of the G and 2D peaks after the Al2O3 deposition indicate that the ALD process did not significantly affect the doping and strain of the EG. The features in the 1200–1500 cm−1 range were related to the interfacial BL, whereas no significant increase of the the intensity of the disorder-related D peak (1300 cm−1) was observed, indicating that no defects were introduced by the ALD process.
The electrical quality of the insulating layer was also evaluated by conductive atomic force microscopy (C-AFM) for current mapping and local current-voltage (I–V) analyses [21]. A morphology map of the scanned area is reported in Figure 6a, which includes both uniform Al2O3 on 1 L EG and Al2O3 on a 2 L EG patch. Figure 6b shows a current map collected on this area with a positive value of the tip bias Vtip = 6 V with respect to EG. While uniform low current values were detected through the 12 nm Al2O3 film onto 1 L EG, the presence of high current spots was observed in the 2 L EG region. Figure 6c illustrates two representative local current–voltage characteristics collected by the C-AFM probe on Al2O3 in the 1 L and 2 L EG regions. While current smoothly increased with the bias for Al2O3 on 1 L EG, an abrupt rise of current was observed for Vtip > 6 V in the case of Al2O3 on 2 L EG. This locally enhanced conduction in the 2 L EG area was justified by the less compact Al2O3 structure and the lower Al2O3 thickness detected in these regions. By adopting a simplified planar capacitor model for the tip/Al2O3/EG system, a breakdown field > 8 MV cm−1 was estimated for the 12 nm Al2O3 on 1 L EG.
The superior homogeneity of Al2O3 deposition on 1 L EG areas indicates a higher reactivity of 1 L EG with respect to 2 L or few layers EG, which was explained in terms of the higher n-type doping and strain caused by the interfacial BL on a single graphene overlayer with respect to 2 L [21]. Recent experimental and theoretical investigations demonstrated that the interaction of polar water molecules with graphene depends on the Fermi level of graphene, i.e., its doping [53]. In particular, ab-initio calculations of the adsorption energy (Ea) for water molecules (the co-reactant of the ALD growth) on 1 L graphene as a function of doping predicted an increase of Ea from 127 meV for neutral graphene to 210 meV for highly n-type doped (1013 cm−2) graphene [21]. The time of residence of a water molecule on graphene at a temperature T depends on Ea as exp(Ea/kBT), where kB is the Boltzmann constant. As a result, for the ALD process temperature (T = 250 °C), the residence time of physisorbed water molecules on the highly n-type doped EG was approximately six times higher than in the case of neutral graphene. The longer residence time provides, in turns, a larger number of reactive sites for Al2O3 formation during subsequent pulses of the Al precursor.

4. ALD on EG With a Seeding-Layer

The above discussed literature results show that uniform and conformal high-k dielectrics could be obtained by direct ALD on monolayer EG areas. However, the availability of 100% 1 L EG coverage by thermal decomposition of SiC still represents a major challenge. For this reason, in many cases, the use of an intermediate seeding layer is the preferred solution to promote homogeneous ALD nucleation on the EG surface. In the following, the main seeding layer processes adopted so far will be presented, discussing the advantages and disadvantages in terms of their impact on the EG structural and electrical properties.

4.1. Oxidized Metal Seed Layer

Physical vapor deposition (PVD) of ultrathin metal films followed by oxidation is one of the most straightforward ways to create a seeding layer on the graphene surface [22]. Robinson et al. [34] investigated thermal ALD of different insulators (Al2O3, TiO2 and Ta2O3) using oxidized metal films as seeding layers in the specific case of few layers EG/SiC(0001). Figure 7a,b shows the morphology of Al2O3 grown at 150 and 300 °C, respectively, with an oxidized Al (AlOx) seed layer. The Al2O3 film uniformity and coverage was found to be significantly improved by increasing the deposition temperature. Deposition of TiO2 on EG with an oxidized Ti (TiOx) seed layer resulted in conformal and continuous films both at 120 °C (Figure 7c) and 250 °C (Figure 7d). Finally, ALD grown Ta2O5 films with an oxidized Ta (TaOx) seed layer showed a high roughness for deposition temperatures of 150 °C (Figure 7e) and 300 °C and (Figure 7f). The impact of the seeded thermal ALD on the EG structural properties (i.e., the defects density) was also qualified by Raman spectroscopy. Figure 7g shows typical Raman spectra of the D and G peaks for AlOx/Al2O3 deposited at 300 °C, TiOx/TiO2 deposited at 250 °C, and TaOx/Ta2O5 deposited at 300 °C. These results show that ALD of high-k dielectric materials with an oxidized metal seed layer generally have little impact on the structural integrity of EG, with the highest EG defectivity obtained in the case of TaOx/Ta2O5, probably generated during oxidation of the Ta seed layer.
In spite of the limited increase in the EG defectivity, a reduction of the electron mobility has been reported in most of the cases after ALD of high-k dielectrics seeded by an oxidized metal [34]. This was ascribed to the poor structural quality and substoichiometric composition of the seed layer (typically due to an incomplete oxidation), leading to charge trapping phenomena and increased electron scattering by charged impurities.

4.2. Deposited High-k Metal-Oxide Seed Layers

As discussed above, the metal to metal-oxide phase transition occurring in the case of the oxidized metal seeding layers can be a source of mobility degradation in EG. To avoid these issues, the deposition of the seed-layer directly on EG from a high-purity oxide source has been also considered.
As an example, Hollander et al. [35] employed 2–3 nm seed layers of SiO2, Al2O3 or HfO2 deposited via nonreactive electron beam physical vapor deposition (EBPVD) at a pressure <10−6 Torr. Immediately following the seed-layer evaporation, 8–10 nm of Al2O3 or HfO2 were deposited by ALD to complete the dielectric stack.
Figure 8a shows Raman spectra acquired on as-grown EG samples, after EBPVD oxide deposition and after the complete oxide-seeded ALD process. Minimal changes in the D/G ratio were observed among the different samples, whereas the blue-shift of the G peak after seed-layer and ALD was ascribed to an increase of EG doping.
Hall effect measurements under high vacuum at 300 K were also carried out on EG prior to and following the metal-oxide seeded ALD in order to evaluate the effect of the deposited dielectrics on carrier transport properties, i.e., the carrier density (ns) and Hall mobility (μHall) [35].
Figure 8b shows the correlation between μHall and ns measured on as-grown EG, after EBPVD of oxides and the complete oxide-seeded ALD (O-ALD). As-grown EG samples presented μHall values of 700–1100 cm2V−1s−1 and ns values of (5–8) × 1012 cm−2 (n-type), typical of Si-face EG. Figure 8 demonstrates that the high-k seeded dielectrics deposited by PVD and O-ALD resulted in an increase in ns and an increase in μHall. Conversely, HfO2 seeded by a low-k insulator (SiO2) resulted in a decrease of μHall and the increase in ns. The measured increase of μHall with deposition of high-k seed was attributed to dielectric screening, i.e., a reduction in scattering by remote charged impurities [54]. In particular, HfO2 seeded O-ALD dielectrics enhance carrier mobility by an estimated 57%–73%, while Al2O3 seeded O-ALD dielectrics increase mobility by 43%–52%.

4.3. Self-Assembled Organic Monolayer

Alaboson et al. [36] demonstrated an alternative ALD seeding layer based on organic monolayers of perylene-3,4,9,10-tetracarboxylic dianhydride (PTCDA). EG on SiC(0001) grown by sublimation in UHV conditions at 1350 °C was used in this study. PTCDA was deposited on the EG surface via gas-phase sublimation in ultrahigh vacuum (UHV), resulting in a highly uniform and ordered self-assembled monolayer. Two typical AFM images of the bare EG and PTCDA/EG surfaces are presented in Figure 9a,c, respectively, showing nearly identical roughness. Figure 9b,d shows two representative AFM images of Al2O3 deposited on the bare EG (b) and on PTCDA/EG (d) using 25 cycles of TMA and H2O at a temperature of 100 °C. While a discontinuous Al2O3 film was observed on the bare EG, the use of the PTCDA seeding layer resulted in a uniform Al2O3 film, conformal with the underlying terraces of the EG surface. Figure 9e shows the evolution of the Al2O3 film thickness as a function of ALD growth cycle evaluated by spectroscopic ellipsometry on the bare EG, on PTCDA/EG and on a reference SiO2 surface. The Al2O3 ALD on the bare EG surface was initially inhibited for 3–4 ALD cycles, indicating a lack of reactive sites for the ALD precursors, as compared to the case of the SiO2 surface. On the other hand, nucleation on the PTCDA-seeded EG surface was more efficient with ALD growth showing a linear behavior after only 1–2 ALD cycles, similarly to the case of the SiO2 surface with a high density of reactive sites.
To probe the adhesion and the insulating properties of the deposited ALD films, C-AFM imaging was employed. The morphology and current maps in Figure 10a,b show that for a thin Al2O3 film (25 ALD cycles) on bare EG, conductive defects were produced after only one C-AFM scan in contact mode (contact force 20 nN, tip/sample voltage V = 0.3 V), resulting in localized conduction spots in the current map. This defect density was further increased after multiple C-AFM scans. Figure 10c,d shows the C-AFM morphology and current maps acquired under the same measurement conditions on the Al2O3 film grown using the same number of ALD cycles on PTCDA/EG. These maps demonstrate the excellent morphological and uniform insulating properties of Al2O3 on PTCDA seeded EG, which are maintained even after multiple C-AFM scans.

5. ALD on Prefunctionalized EG

Different prefunctionalization processes of the EG surface by direct exposure to reactive gas species have been reported so far.

5.1. Ozone Prefunctionalization

Speck et al. [38] evaluated the effect of in-situ ozone (O3) pretreatment on the uniformity of ALD grown Al2O3 onto EG. Firstly, a preliminary study of the influence of different O3 dosing conditions (i.e., number of O3 pulses and temperature) on the structural properties of EG was carried out. Figure 11a shows the comparison between two C1s core level X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) measurements on as-grown EG and after exposure to 20 O3 pulses at a temperature of 250 °C, respectively. The two spectra show two prominent peaks associated to the EG and to the SiC substrate (covered by EG), respectively, and a shoulder associated to the interfacial BL. The two spectra are almost perfectly overlapped, indicating a negligible effect of the O3 treatment at 250 °C on EG structural and chemical properties. Figure 11b shows a C1s core level spectrum acquired on EG after 20 O3 pulses at a higher temperature of 350 °C, with a deconvolution of the different spectral contributions, associated to the SiC substrate, to EG and to the BL. In addition to the components present in the pristine EG sample and in the O3 -functionalized one at 250 °C (Figure 11a), another peak at lower binding energy, associated to SiC uncovered by EG, was observed in the EG sample subjected to the 20 O3 pulses at 350 °C. From the XPS peaks intensity ratio, these bare SiC regions due to partial etching of EG by O3, were found to correspond to 45% of EG surface. The degradation of the structural integrity of EG after this O3 pretreatment (20 pulses at 350 °C) was also confirmed by Raman spectroscopy, showing a strong increase of the defects-related D peak and a large broadening of the G peak. Noteworthy, further experiments showed that EG damage can be mitigated by properly reducing the number of O3 pulses [38]. As an example, the percentage of etched EG at 350 °C was found to be reduced to 2.5% by using only 2 O3 pulses. Figure 11c shows a representative AFM image of a 50 nm thick Al2O3 film obtained by 500 TMA/water cycles on the EG sample prefunctionalized using 20 O3 pulses at 250 °C, i.e., the non-destructive conditions illustrated in Figure 11a. Although a uniform Al2O3 coating was obtained on the entire EG surface, the higher roughness of the oxide film in the 2 L EG region close to the SiC steps indicated a limit for further reduction of O3 exposure and temperature.

5.2. Fluorine Prefunctionalization

Wheeler et al. [39] investigated fluorine prefunctionalization of EG for uniform deposition of thin high-k dielectrics. Due to its high electronegativity (4.0) and its ability to adhere to carbon surfaces [55], fluorine is a suitable reactive species to enhance graphene surface reactions with ALD precursors. Fluorination of the EG grown onto on-axis 6H–SiC (0001) was carried out at room temperature exposing the EG surface to XeF2 gas pulses, with the total fluorine dosing time varied in the range from 0 to 200 s. Core level XPS was used to preliminary determine the bonding characteristics of fluorine with the EG surface with increasing XeF2 exposure time. Figure 12a,d shows the C1s XPS spectra acquired on as-grown EG (a) and on EG subjected to 40 s (b), 120 s (c) and 200 s (d) XeF2 exposure times. For as-grown EG (a), the contributions associated to the SiC substrate, to EG and to the interfacial buffer layer were visible. A very similar XPS spectrum was found after 40 s XeF2 exposure (b), whereas the appearance of a feature at 288.5 eV, associated to C–F bonds, could be observed after 120 s (c) and 200 s (d) XeF2 exposure times. Such bonds are created by breaking the sp2 symmetry of the EG lattice resulting in carbon sp3 bonds with fluorine. A decrease in the EG peak intensity was observed corresponding to the appearance of C-F bonds, which further supports the transition from sp2 to sp3 bonded carbon on the surface. For the largest exposure time (d), an additional small peak associated to C–F2 bonds was detected at 290 eV. The formation of C–F2 was accompanied by a significant deformation of the EG lattice, leading to a degradation of EG electrical properties. Hence, it was chosen to work in a fluorination regime where C–F bonding only occurred. The C-F sp3 bond configuration was found to provide additional reaction sites of oxide nucleation and growth during the subsequent ALD process. After the initial assessment of the effect of XeF2 exposure on EG chemical properties, Al2O3 films (15 nm thickness) were deposited by thermal ALD at 225 °C using TMA/H2O precursors.
AFM characterization of the Al2O3 uniformity was carried out for all the fluorine prefunctionalization conditions. Figure 12e,h shows four representative AFM images of Al2O3 deposited on pristine EG (c) and after fluorine prefunctionalization at 40 s (f), 120 s (g) and 200 s (h), respectively. An inhomogeneous Al2O3 coverage, especially close to the SiC step edges, was observed on the untreated EG (e) and after 40 s XeF2 exposure (f). Highly uniform and conformal coverage by the 15 nm Al2O3 film was obtained on the fluorine prefunctionalized sample by 120 s XeF2 exposure, as shown in Figure 12g. This indicated the need of C–F bonding, as observed by XPS (Figure 12c) to promote adhesion of the ALD oxide to the EG film. A slight degradation of Al2O3 uniformity with the appearance of small pinholes in the oxide was observed in the sample prefunctionalized by 200 s XeF2 exposure (Figure 12h). Hence, based on morphological characterization, an optimal window of XeF2 exposure times from 60 to 180 s was identified to functionalize the EG surface with C–F bonds, resulting in uniform ALD of high-k dielectric films. Noteworthy, an almost unchanged surface roughness was observed comparing the morphology of EG before and after the prefunctionalization under these optimal conditions, indicating that the formation of C-F bonds does not substantially disrupt the EG lattice and planarity. Raman spectroscopy was also performed after the XeF2 pretreatment and ALD to evaluate the effect of these processes on the underlying EG. In spite of the formation of sp3 C–F bonds due to the XeF2 pretreatment, no significant increase in the D/G peaks intensity ratio was observed with increasing the XeF2 exposure time (i.e., the fluorine percentage on EG surface), suggesting the EG lattice was relatively unperturbed throughout the XeF2 and ALD process.

6. Open Research Issues and Perspectives

Deposition of ultra-thin and conformal insulators represents a key requirement for the fabrication of devices based on different kinds of graphene. Besides ALD, also physical deposition methods (e.g., evaporation or sputtering) have been explored to this purpose. Although the presence of active sites on graphene surface is not required for these approaches, physical deposition of insulators typically results in graphene damage and/or a reduction of the carrier mobility [56,57]. For this reason, ALD became the preferred approach for insulators deposition on graphene, in spite of the nucleation issues.
Thermal ALD of high-k dielectrics on EG presents some peculiar aspects related to the unique electrical/structural properties of the EG/SiC(0001) system, i.e., the presence of the sp3 hybridized interfacial BL, responsible for a high n-type doping and compressive strain of the overlying graphene. These properties were shown to be beneficial in enhancing the Al2O3 nucleation on 1 L EG, whereas a poorer nucleation was observed on 2 L or few layers EG. Hence, the availability of 100% 1L EG coverage by thermal decomposition of SiC still represents a major challenge for direct ALD on EG.
CVD grown graphene on catalytic metals is another type of graphene widely used for electronics/optoelectronic applications. Typically, this material is transferred on insulating substrate and subsequently processed for devices fabrication. As the thermal ALD process commonly results in an inhomogeneous coverage, seeding layers or prefunctionalization treatments with reactive gas species are commonly employed to promote the ALD growth. However, these processes need to be carefully optimized to minimize structural damage and/or a degradation of the electrical properties (doping and mobility) of underlying graphene.
Recently, Dlubak et al. [58] demonstrated the direct thermal ALD of uniform Al2O3 films on monolayer CVD graphene laying on the native metal substrates (Cu and Ni-Au). The enhanced nucleation was ascribed to the wetting transparency of monolayer graphene [59] and to the presence of peculiar polar traps at the graphene/metal interface, which promote the adsorption of water molecules (i.e., the oxygen precursor for the ALD process) on the graphene surface. Clearly, the number of graphene layers is a crucial aspect for this growth mechanism. In fact, the strength of the electrostatic interaction between the water precursor and the polar traps is weakened for multilayer graphene due to a decreased transparency, resulting in an inhomogeneous Al2O3 coverage [58]. The direct growth of Al2O3 or HfO2 on CVD graphene residing on the native metal substrate has the advantage of providing a protective layer for graphene, avoiding the direct contact of Gr with the polymeric films typically used for the transfer process [60]. Furthermore, after transfer to an insulating substrate, the oxide layer on graphene can work a gate dielectric for graphene field effect transistors [60]. Although the ALD grown protective layer is beneficial to solve the problems related to polymeric contaminations on graphene surface, the transfer of the oxide/graphene stack from the native metal substrate to the target substrate still remains a critical step.
Most studies reported so far for ALD on graphene concern the deposition of metal-oxides. However, the integration of ultra-thin films of other materials, such as nitrides (including SiNx, AlN, etc.), hexagonal boron nitride, and transition metal dichalcogenides, TMDs, (such as MoS2, WS2, MoSe2 and WSe2,) with graphene (and specifically with the EG/SiC(0001) system) is attracting an increasing interest for novel electronics/optoelectronics applications [61,62], and ALD can play a key role in this field. To date, MOCVD and MBE are mainly employed for the integration of nitrides with graphene. Although plasma assisted-ALD allows a superior control on the uniformity of SiNx [63] and AlN [64] thin films, the main issue is the plasma-induced damage or doping in graphene. Optimized ALD approaches for the growth of these materials on graphene are envisaged for the next years.
Hexagonal boron nitride (h-BN) is an insulating layered material with lattice structure similar to graphite. Due to the atomically sharp interface formed between h-BN and graphene, it is considered as the ideal insulator to achieve the intrinsic graphene mobility [65]. However, due to its low dielectric constant (k ≈ 4), the h-BN interfacial layer must be combined with a high-k dielectric overlayer in order to reduce the effective oxide thickness (EOT) for realistic integration in graphene field effect transistors. Recently, the direct ALD growth of a high-k insulator (Y2O3) on the sp2 h-BN surface has been demonstrated, and the deposition mechanism was explained by enhanced adsorption of the Y precursor on h-BN due to the polarization [66]. The challenge in this research field is the large area growth of h-BN on graphene by scalable approaches.
The growth of MoS2 and other TMDs on EG is currently explored for the realization of 2D materials Van-der Waals heterojunctions on large area [67]. In this context, ALD can represent a valid alternative to the most employed CVD approaches. Dedicated studies on the selection of the precursors and on ALD deposition conditions are expected in the forthcoming years in this emerging research field.

7. Conclusions

In conclusion, the research on ALD of high-k insulators on EG was reviewed, with a focus on the role played by the peculiar electrical/structural properties of the EG/SiC(0001) interface in the nucleation step of the ALD process. Direct thermal ALD of uniform Al2O3 thin films on monolayer EG areas was demonstrated to be possible, but achieving monolayer graphene on the entire SiC surface still remains a major challenge. An overview of seeding layers approaches (oxidized metal films, directly deposited metal-oxides and self-assembled organic monolayers) and prefunctionalization treatments (e.g., ozone or fluorine treatments) for the ALD of different high-k materials on EG was provided, considering the impact of these surface preparation processes on the defectivity and electrical properties (doping and carrier mobility) of the underlying EG. Finally, the open scientific issues and the perspectives for ALD growth of alternative insulator/semiconductor films (including AlN, SiN, h-BN and TMDs) on graphene were discussed.

Author Contributions

Writing—original draft preparation, F.G.; writing—review and editing, F.G., E.S., R.L.N., F.R. and R.Y.; supervision, F.G.; funding acquisition, F.G. and F.R. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was funded, in part, by MIUR in the framework of the FlagERA-JTC 2015 project GraNitE and the FlagERA-JTC 2019 project ETMOS.

Acknowledgments

The authors want to acknowledge P. Fiorenza, G. Greco, S. Di Franco, I. Deretzis, G. Nicotra and A. La Magna and (CNR-IMM Catania, Italy), A. Armano, M. Cannas, M. Gelardi, and S. Agnello (University of Palermo, Italy), I. Cora and B. Pecz (Hungarian Academy of Sciences, Budapest), I. G. Ivanov and I. Shtepliuk (Linkoping University, Sweden) for useful discussions and the participation in some of the experiments reported in this review paper.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Novoselov, K.S.; Geim, A.K.; Morozov, S.V.; Jiang, D.; Zhang, Y.; Dubonos, S.V.; Grigorieva, I.V.; Firsov, A.A. Electric Field Effect in Atomically Thin Carbon Films. Science 2004, 306, 666–669. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  2. Berger, C.; Song, Z.; Li, X.; Wu, X.; Brown, N.; Naud, C.; Mayou, D.; Li, T.; Hass, J.; Marchenkov, A.N.; et al. Electronic confinement and coherence in patterned epitaxial graphene. Science 2006, 312, 1191–1196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  3. Emtsev, K.V.; Bostwick, A.; Horn, K.; Jobst, J.; Kellogg, G.L.; Ley, L.; McChesney, J.L.; Ohta, T.; Reshanov, S.A.; Rohrl, J.; et al. Towards wafer-size graphene layers by atmospheric pressure graphitization of SiC(0001). Nat. Mater. 2009, 8, 203–207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Virojanadara, C.; Syvajarvi, M.; Yakimova, R.; Johansson, L.I.; Zakharov, A.A.; Balasubramanian, T. Homogeneous large-area graphene layer growth on 6H-SiC(0001). Phys. Rev. B 2008, 78, 245403. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Moon, J.S.; Curtis, D.; Hu, M.; Wong, D.; McGuire, C.; Campbell, P.M.; Jernigan, G.; Tedesco, J.L.; VanMil, B.; Myers-Ward, R.; et al. Epitaxial-Graphene RF Field-Effect Transistors on Si-Face 6H-SiC Substrates. IEEE Electron Device Lett. 2009, 30, 650–652. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Lin, Y.-M.; Dimitrakopoulos, C.; Jenkins, K.A.; Farmer, D.B.; Chiu, H.-Y.; Grill, A.; Avouris, P. 100-GHz Transistors from Wafer-Scale Epitaxial Graphene. Science 2010, 327, 662. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Tzalenchuk, A.; Lara-Avila, S.; Kalaboukhov, A.; Paolillo, S.; Syväjärvi, M.; Yakimova, R.; Kazakova, O.; Janssen, T.J.B.M.; Fal’ko, V.; Kubatkin, S. Towards a quantum resistance standard based on epitaxial graphene. Nat. Nanotechnol. 2010, 5, 186–189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Pearce, R.; Iakimov, T.; Andersson, M.; Hultman, L.; Lloyd Spetz, A.; Yakimova, R. Epitaxially grown graphene based gas sensors for ultra sensitive NO2 detection. Sens. Actuators B 2011, 155, 451–455. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Li, X.; Cai, W.; An, J.; Kim, S.; Nah, J.; Yang, D.; Piner, R.; Velamakanni, A.; Jung, I.; Tutuc, E.; et al. Large-area synthesis of high-quality and uniform graphene films on copper foils. Science 2009, 324, 1312–1314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Kang, J.; Shin, D.; Bae, S.; Hong, B.H. Graphene transfer: Key for applications. Nanoscale 2012, 4, 5527. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Fisichella, G.; Di Franco, S.; Roccaforte, F.; Ravesi, S.; Giannazzo, F. Microscopic mechanisms of graphene electrolytic delamination from metal substrates. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2014, 104, 233105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Lin, Y.; Lu, C.; Yeh, C.; Jin, C.; Suenaga, K.; Chiu, P. Graphene Annealing: How Clean Can It Be? Nano Lett. 2012, 12, 414–419. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Lupina, G.; Kitzmann, J.; Costina, I.; Lukosius, M.; Wenger, C.; Wolff, A.; Vaziri, S.; Ostling, M.; Pasternak, I.; Krajewska, A.; et al. Residual metallic contamination of transferred chemical vapor deposited graphene. ACS Nano 2015, 9, 4776. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Wu, Y.; Lin, Y.; Bol, A.A.; Jenkins, K.A.; Xia, F.; Farmer, D.B.; Zhu, Y.; Avouris, P. High-Frequency, Scaled Graphene Transistors on Diamond-Like Carbon. Nature 2011, 472, 74–78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Mehr, W.; Dabrowski, J.; Scheytt, J.C.; Lippert, G.; Xie, Y.H.; Lemme, M.C.; Ostling, M.; Lupina, G. Vertical Graphene Base Transistor. IEEE Electron Device Lett. 2012, 33, 691–693. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  16. Giannazzo, F.; Greco, G.; Roccaforte, F.; Sonde, S.S. Vertical Transistors Based on 2D Materials: Status and Prospects. Crystals 2018, 8, 70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  17. Giannazzo, F.; Greco, G.; Schilirò, E.; Lo Nigro, R.; Deretzis, I.; La Magna, A.; Roccaforte, F.; Iucolano, F.; Ravesi, S.; Frayssinet, E.; et al. High-Performance Graphene/AlGaN/GaN Schottky Junctions for Hot Electron Transistors. ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. 2019, 1, 2342–2354. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Pakalla, A.; Putkonen, M. Handbook of Deposition Technologies for Films and Coatings, 3rd ed.; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2010; pp. 364–391. [Google Scholar]
  19. Wang, X.; Tabakman, S.M.; Dai, H. Atomic Layer Deposition of Metal Oxides on Pristine and Functionalized Graphene. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2008, 130, 8152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Vervuurt, R.H.J.; Karasulu, B.; Verheijen, M.A.; Kessels, W.M.M.; Bol, A.A. Uniform Atomic Layer Deposition of Al2O3 on Graphene by Reversible Hydrogen Plasma Functionalization. Chem. Mater. 2017, 29, 2090. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Schilirò, E.; Lo Nigro, R.; Roccaforte, F.; Deretzis, J.; La Magna, A.; Armano, A.; Agnello, S.; Pecz, B.; Ivanov, I.G.; Giannazzo, F. Seed-Layer-Free Atomic Layer Deposition of Highly Uniform Al2O3 Thin Films onto Monolayer Epitaxial Graphene on Silicon Carbide. Adv. Mater. Interfaces 2019, 6, 1900097. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Lin, Y.-M.; Jenkins, K.A.; Valdes-Garcia, A.; Small, J.P.; Farmer, D.B.; Avouris, P. Operation of Graphene Transistors at Gigahertz Frequencies. Nano Lett. 2008, 9, 422. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  23. Kim, S.; Nah, J.; Jo, I.; Shahrjerdi, D.; Colombo, L.; Yao, Z.; Tutuc, E.; Banerjee, S.K. Realization of a high mobility dual-gated graphene field-effect transistor with Al2O3 dielectric. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2009, 94, 062107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  24. Fisichella, G.; Schilirò, E.; Di Franco, S.; Fiorenza, P.; Lo Nigro, R.; Roccaforte, F.; Ravesi, S.; Giannazzo, F. Interface Electrical Properties of Al2O3 Thin Films on Graphene Obtained by Atomic Layer Deposition with an in Situ Seedlike Layer. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2017, 9, 7761–7771. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Shen, T.; Gu, J.J.; Xu, M.; Wu, Y.Q.; Bolen, M.L.; Capano, M.A.; Engel, L.W.; Ye, P.D. Observation of quantum-Hall effect in gated epitaxial graphene grown on SiC (0001). Appl. Phys. Lett. 2009, 95, 172105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Fallahazad, B.; Lee, K.; Lian, G.; Kim, S.; Corbet, C.M.; Ferrer, D.A.; Colombo, L.; Tutuc, E. Scaling of Al2O3 dielectric for graphene field-effect transistors. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2012, 100, 093112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Meric, I.; Dean, C.R.; Young, A.F.; Baklitskaya, N.; Tremblay, N.J.; Nuckolls, C.; Kim, P.; Shepard, K.L. Channel length scaling in graphene field-effect transistors studied with pulsed current-voltage measurements. Nano Lett. 2011, 11, 1093. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Farmer, D.B.; Chiu, H.-Y.; Lin, Y.-M.; Jenkins, K.A.; Xia, F.; Avouris, P. Utilization of a Buffered Dielectric to Achieve High Field-Effect Carrier Mobility in Graphene Transistors. Nano Lett. 2009, 9, 4474. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  29. Lim, T.; Kim, D.; Ju, S. Direct deposition of aluminum oxide gate dielectric on graphene channel using nitrogen plasma treatment. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2013, 113, 013107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Schilirò, E.; Lo Nigro, R.; Roccaforte, F.; Giannazzo, F. Recent Advances in Seeded and Seed-Layer-Free Atomic Layer Deposition of High-K Dielectrics on Graphene for Electronics. C J. Carbon Res. 2019, 5, 53. [Google Scholar]
  31. Lee, B.; Mordi, G.; Kim, M.J.; Chabal, Y.J.; Vogel, E.M.; Wallace, R.M.; Cho, K.J.; Colombo, L.; Kim, J. Characteristics of high-k Al2O3 dielectric using ozone-based atomic layer deposition for dual-gated graphene devices. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2010, 97, 043107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Lee, B.; Park, S.-Y.; Kim, H.-C.; Cho, K.; Vogel, E.M.; Kim, M.J.; Wallace, R.M.; Kim, J. Conformal Al2O3 dielectric layer deposited by atomic layer deposition for graphene-based nanoelectronics. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2008, 92, 203102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Vervuurt, R.H.J.; Kessels, W.M.M.; Bol, A.A. Atomic Layer Deposition for Graphene Device Integration. Adv. Mater. Interfaces 2017, 4, 1700232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  34. Robinson, J.A.; LaBella, M.; Trumbull, K.A.; Weng, X.; Cavelero, R.; Daniels, T.; Hughes, Z.; Hollander, M.; Fanton, M.; Snyder, D. Epitaxial Graphene Materials Integration: Effects of Dielectric Overlayers on Structural and Electronic Properties. ACS Nano 2010, 4, 2667–2672. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Hollander, M.J.; LaBella, M.; Hughes, Z.R.; Zhu, M.; Trumbull, K.A.; Cavalero, R.; Snyder, D.W.; Wang, X.; Hwang, E.; Datta, S.; et al. Enhanced Transport and Transistor Performance with Oxide Seeded High-k Gate Dielectrics on Wafer-Scale Epitaxial Graphene. Nano Lett. 2011, 11, 3601. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Alaboson, J.M.P.; Wang, Q.H.; Emery, J.D.; Lipson, A.L.; Bedzyk, M.J.; Elam, J.W.; Pellin, M.J.; Hersam, M.C. Seeding Atomic Layer Deposition of High-k Dielectrics on Epitaxial Graphene with Organic Self-Assembled Monolayers. ACS Nano 2011, 5, 5223–5232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Nath, A.; Kong, B.D.; Koehler, A.D.; Anderson, V.R.; Wheeler, V.D.; Daniels, K.M.; Boyd, A.K.; Cleveland, E.R.; Myers-Ward, R.L.; Gaskill, D.K.; et al. Universal conformal ultrathin dielectrics on epitaxial graphene enabled by a graphene oxide seed layer. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2017, 110, 013106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Speck, F.; Ostler, M.; Röhrl, J.; Emtsev, K.V.; Hundhausen, M.; Ley, L.; Seyller, T. Atomic layer deposited aluminum oxide films on graphite and graphene studied by XPS and AFM. Phys. Status Solidi C 2010, 7, 398–401. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Wheeler, V.; Garces, N.; Nyakiti, L.; Myers-Ward, R.; Jernigan, G.; Culbertson, J.; Eddy, C., Jr.; Gaskill, D.K. Fluorine functionalization of epitaxial graphene for uniform deposition of thin high-k dielectrics. Carbon 2012, 50, 2307–2314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Emtsev, K.V.; Speck, F.; Seyller, T.; Ley, L.; Riley, J.D. Interaction, growth, and ordering of epitaxial graphene on SiC{0001} surfaces: A comparative photoelectron spectroscopy study. Phys. Rev. B 2008, 77, 155303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  41. Jabakhanji, B.; Camara, N.; Caboni, A.; Consejo, C.; Jouault, B.; Godignon, P.; Camassel, J. Almost Free Standing Graphene on SiC(000-1) and SiC(11-20). Mater. Sci. Forum 2012, 711, 235–241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Bouhafs, C.; Zakharov, A.A.; Ivanov, I.G.; Giannazzo, F.; Eriksson, J.; Stanishev, V.; Kühne, P.; Iakimov, T.; Hofmann, T.; Schubert, M.; et al. Multi-scale investigation of interface properties, stacking order and decoupling of few layer graphene on C-face 4H-SiC. Carbon 2017, 116, 722–732. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  43. Nicotra, G.; Deretzis, I.; Scuderi, M.; Spinella, C.; Longo, P.; Yakimova, R.; Giannazzo, F.; La Magna, A. Interface disorder probed at the atomic scale for graphene grown on the C face of SiC. Phys. Rev. B 2015, 91, 15541. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  44. Ostler, M.; Deretzis, I.; Mammadov, S.; Giannazzo, F.; Nicotra, G.; Spinella, C.; Seyller, T.; La Magna, A. Direct growth of quasi-free-standing epitaxial graphene on nonpolar SiC surfaces. Phys. Rev. B 2013, 88, 085408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  45. Varchon, F.; Feng, R.; Hass, J.; Li, X.; Ngoc Nguyen, B.; Naud, C.; Mallet, P.; Veuillen, J.-Y.; Berger, C.; Conrad, E.H.; et al. Electronic Structure of Epitaxial Graphene Layers on SiC: Effect of the Substrate. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2007, 99, 126805. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  46. Riedl, C.; Zakharov, A.A.; Starke, U.; Riedl, C. Precise in situ thickness analysis of epitaxial graphene layers on SiC(0001) using low-energy electron diffraction and angle resolved ultraviolet photoelectron spectroscopy. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2008, 93, 033106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Sonde, S.; Giannazzo, F.; Raineri, V.; Yakimova, R.; Huntzinger, J.-R.; Tiberj, A.; Camassel, J. Electrical properties of the graphene/4H-SiC (0001) interface probed by scanning current spectroscopy. J. Phys. Rev. B 2009, 80, 241406. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Vecchio, C.; Sonde, S.; Bongiorno, C.; Rambach, M.; Yakimova, R.; Rimini, E.; Raineri, V.; Giannazzo, F. Nanoscale structural characterization of epitaxial graphene grown on off-axis 4H-SiC (0001). Nanoscale Res. Lett. 2011, 6, 269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  49. Giannazzo, F.; Deretzis, I.; La Magna, A.; Roccaforte, F.; Yakimova, R. Electronic transport at monolayer-bilayer junctions in epitaxial graphene on SiC. Phys. Rev. B 2012, 86, 235422. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Nicotra, G.; Ramasse, Q.M.; Deretzis, I.; La Magna, A.; Spinella, C.; Giannazzo, F. Delaminated Graphene at Silicon Carbide Facets: Atomic Scale Imaging and Spectroscopy. ACS Nano 2013, 7, 3045–3052. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Ivanov, I.G.; Ul Hassan, J.; Iakimov, T.; Zakharov, A.A.; Yakimova, R.; Janzén, E. Layer number determination in graphene on SiC by reflectance mapping. Carbon 2014, 77, 492. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  52. Lee, D.S.; Riedl, C.; Krauss, B.; von Klitzing, K.; Starke, U.; Smet, J.H. Raman Spectra of Epitaxial Graphene on SiC and of Epitaxial Graphene Transferred to SiO2. Nano Lett. 2008, 8, 4320. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  53. Hong, G.; Han, Y.; Schutzius, T.M.; Wang, Y.; Pan, Y.; Hu, M.; Jie, J.; Sharma, C.S.; Muller, U.; Poulikakos, D. On the Mechanism of Hydrophilicity of Graphene. Nano Lett. 2016, 16, 4447. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Giannazzo, F.; Sonde, S.; Lo Nigro, R.; Rimini, E.; Raineri, V. Mapping the Density of Scattering Centers Limiting the Electron Mean Free Path in Graphene. Nano Lett. 2011, 11, 4612–4618. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Touhara, H.; Okino, F. Property control of carbon materials by fluorination. Carbon 2000, 38, 241–267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Lemme, M.C.; Echtermeyer, T.J.; Baus, M.; Kurz, H. A Graphene Field-Effect Device. IEEE Electron Device Lett. 2007, 28, 282–284. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  57. Ni, Z.H.; Wang, H.M.; Ma, Y.; Kasim, J.; Wu, Y.H.; Shen, Z.X. Tunable Stress and Controlled Thickness Modification in Graphene by Annealing. ACS Nano 2008, 2, 1033–1039. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  58. Dlubak, B.; Kidambi, P.R.; Weatherup, R.S.; Hofmann, S.; Robertson, J. Substrate-assisted nucleation of ultra-thin dielectric layers on graphene by atomic layer deposition. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2012, 100, 173113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Rafiee, J.; Mi, X.; Gullapalli, H.; Thomas, A.V.; Yavari, F.; Shi, Y.; Ajayan, P.M.; Koratkar, N.A. Wetting transparency of graphene. Nat. Mater. 2012, 11, 217–222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Cabrero-Vilatela, A.; Alexander-Webber, J.A.; Sagade, A.A.; Aria, A.I.; Braeuninger-Weimer, P.; Martin, M.-B.; Weatherup, R.S.; Hofmann, S. Atomic layer deposited oxide films as protective interface layers for integrated graphene transfer. Nanotechnology 2017, 28, 485201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Giannazzo, F.; Fisichella, G.; Greco, G.; La Magna, A.; Roccaforte, F.; Pecz, B.; Yakimova, R.; Dagher, R.; Michon, A.; Cordier, Y. Graphene integration with nitride semiconductors for high power and high frequency electronics. Phys. Status Solidi A 2017, 214, 1600460. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Zubair, A.; Nourbakhsh, A.; Hong, J.-Y.; Qi, M.; Song, Y.; Jena, D.; Kong, J.; Dresselhaus, M.; Palacios, T. Hot Electron Transistor with van der Waals Base-Collector Heterojunction and High- Performance GaN Emitter. Nano Lett. 2017, 17, 3089–3096. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Meng, X.; Byun, Y.-C.; Kim, H.S.; Lee, J.S.; Lucero, A.T.; Cheng, L.; Kim, J. Atomic Layer Deposition of Silicon Nitride Thin Films: A Review of Recent Progress, Challenges, and Outlooks. Materials 2016, 9, 1007. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  64. Schilirò, E.; Giannazzo, F.; Bongiorno, C.; Di Franco, S.; Greco, G.; Roccaforte, F.; Prystawko, P.; Kruszewski, P.; Leszczyński, M.; Krysko, M.; et al. Structural and electrical properties of AlN thin films on GaN substrates grown by plasma enhanced-Atomic Layer Deposition. Mater. Sci. Semicond. Process. 2019, 97, 35–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Dean, C.R.; Young, A.F.; Meric, I.; Lee, C.; Wang, L.; Sorgenfrei, S.; Watanabe, K.; Taniguchi, T.; Kim, P.; Shepard, K.L.; et al. Boron nitride substrates for high-quality graphene electronics. Nat. Nanotechnol. 2010, 5, 722. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Takahashi, N.; Watanabe, K.; Taniguchi, T.; Nagashio, K. Atomic layer deposition of Y2O3 on h-BN for a gate stack in graphene FETs. Nanotechnology 2015, 26, 175708. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  67. Lin, Y.-C.; Ghosh, R.K.; Addou, R.; Lu, N.; Eichfeld, S.M.; Zhu, H.; Li, M.-Y.; Peng, X.; Kim, M.J.; Li, L.-J.; et al. Atomically thin resonant tunnel diodes built from synthetic van der Waals heterostructures. Nat. Commun. 2015, 6, 7311. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Applsci 10 02440 g001 550
Figure 1. Illustration of the structure of monolayer EG grown on SiC (0001), showing the buffer layer partially bond to the Si face, with unsaturated dangling bonds at the interface.
Figure 1. Illustration of the structure of monolayer EG grown on SiC (0001), showing the buffer layer partially bond to the Si face, with unsaturated dangling bonds at the interface.
Applsci 10 02440 g001
Applsci 10 02440 g002 550
Figure 2. (a) Atomic force microscopy (AFM) morphology and (b) low energy electron microscopy (LEEM) map of EG grown on 6H–SiC(0001) by sublimation in ultra-high-vacuum (UHV) at a temperature T = 1280 °C. (c) AFM morphology and (d) LEEM map of EG on 6H–SiC(0001) obtained by sublimation in Ar ambient at atmospheric pressure (p = 900 mbar) and at a temperature T = 1650 °C. Darker LEEM contrast corresponds to a larger number of graphene layers. Images adapted with permission from Ref. [21], Copyright Nature Publishing Group 2009.
Figure 2. (a) Atomic force microscopy (AFM) morphology and (b) low energy electron microscopy (LEEM) map of EG grown on 6H–SiC(0001) by sublimation in ultra-high-vacuum (UHV) at a temperature T = 1280 °C. (c) AFM morphology and (d) LEEM map of EG on 6H–SiC(0001) obtained by sublimation in Ar ambient at atmospheric pressure (p = 900 mbar) and at a temperature T = 1650 °C. Darker LEEM contrast corresponds to a larger number of graphene layers. Images adapted with permission from Ref. [21], Copyright Nature Publishing Group 2009.
Applsci 10 02440 g002
Applsci 10 02440 g003 550
Figure 3. (a) Reflectance map of as-grown EG collected on a 30 μm × 30 μm sample area. The red contrast background is associated with 1 L graphene (98.7% of the total area) and the yellow elongated patches to 2 L graphene (1.3% of the total area). (b) AFM morphology and (c) phase contrast map on a 30 μm × 30 μm sample area. The small elongated patches with higher phase contrast correspond to 2 L EG. Images adapted with permission from Ref. [21], copyright Wiley 2019.
Figure 3. (a) Reflectance map of as-grown EG collected on a 30 μm × 30 μm sample area. The red contrast background is associated with 1 L graphene (98.7% of the total area) and the yellow elongated patches to 2 L graphene (1.3% of the total area). (b) AFM morphology and (c) phase contrast map on a 30 μm × 30 μm sample area. The small elongated patches with higher phase contrast correspond to 2 L EG. Images adapted with permission from Ref. [21], copyright Wiley 2019.
Applsci 10 02440 g003
Applsci 10 02440 g004 550
Figure 4. AFM images of Al2O3 grown directly on the pristine EG surface by 500 thermal ALD cycles of TMA/water (i.e., 50 nm Al2O3) at different temperatures: (a) 200 °C, (b) 300 °C and (c) 350 °C. Images adapted with permission from Ref. [38], copyright Wiley 2010.
Figure 4. AFM images of Al2O3 grown directly on the pristine EG surface by 500 thermal ALD cycles of TMA/water (i.e., 50 nm Al2O3) at different temperatures: (a) 200 °C, (b) 300 °C and (c) 350 °C. Images adapted with permission from Ref. [38], copyright Wiley 2010.
Applsci 10 02440 g004
Applsci 10 02440 g005 550
Figure 5. (a) AFM morphology (20 μm × 20 μm scan area) of Al2O3 directly grown on 1 L EG on SiC by 190 water/TMA ALD cycles. (b) Cross-sectional TEM image of the Al2O3 layer. (c) Representative Raman spectra of virgin EG and after the Al2O3 deposition. Images adapted with permission from Ref. [21], copyright Wiley 2019.
Figure 5. (a) AFM morphology (20 μm × 20 μm scan area) of Al2O3 directly grown on 1 L EG on SiC by 190 water/TMA ALD cycles. (b) Cross-sectional TEM image of the Al2O3 layer. (c) Representative Raman spectra of virgin EG and after the Al2O3 deposition. Images adapted with permission from Ref. [21], copyright Wiley 2019.
Applsci 10 02440 g005
Applsci 10 02440 g006 550
Figure 6. Conductive atomic force microscopy (C-AFM) local current mapping through an Al2O3 thin film deposited onto EG on axis 4H-SiC(0001). (a) Morphology of the probed sample area, including both uniform Al2O3 on 1 L EG and Al2O3 on a 2 L EG patch. (b) Current map collected on this area with a tip bias Vtip = 6 V. (c) Two representative local current-voltage characteristics collected by the C-AFM probe on Al2O3 in the 1 L and 2 L EG regions. Images adapted with permission from Ref. [21], copyright Wiley 2019.
Figure 6. Conductive atomic force microscopy (C-AFM) local current mapping through an Al2O3 thin film deposited onto EG on axis 4H-SiC(0001). (a) Morphology of the probed sample area, including both uniform Al2O3 on 1 L EG and Al2O3 on a 2 L EG patch. (b) Current map collected on this area with a tip bias Vtip = 6 V. (c) Two representative local current-voltage characteristics collected by the C-AFM probe on Al2O3 in the 1 L and 2 L EG regions. Images adapted with permission from Ref. [21], copyright Wiley 2019.
Applsci 10 02440 g006
Applsci 10 02440 g007 550
Figure 7. AFM morphology of Al2O3 thin films grown by ALD at 150 °C (a) and 300 °C (b) on EG/SiC with an oxidized Al seed layer. Morphology of TiO2 grown by ALD at 120 °C (c) and 250 °C (d) on EG/SiC with an oxidized Ti seed layer. Morphology of Ta2O5 grown by ALD at 150 °C (e) and 300 °C (f) on EG/SiC with an oxidized Ta seed layer. (g) Raman spectra of as-grown EG and after ALD deposition of Al2O3, TiO2 and Ta2O5 with different seed layers. Al2O3 and TiO2 deposition introduces only a small amount of disorder in EG, whereas Ta2O5 deposition appears to significantly degrade the quality of the underlying EG. Images adapted with permission from Ref. [34], Copyright American Chemical Society 2010.
Figure 7. AFM morphology of Al2O3 thin films grown by ALD at 150 °C (a) and 300 °C (b) on EG/SiC with an oxidized Al seed layer. Morphology of TiO2 grown by ALD at 120 °C (c) and 250 °C (d) on EG/SiC with an oxidized Ti seed layer. Morphology of Ta2O5 grown by ALD at 150 °C (e) and 300 °C (f) on EG/SiC with an oxidized Ta seed layer. (g) Raman spectra of as-grown EG and after ALD deposition of Al2O3, TiO2 and Ta2O5 with different seed layers. Al2O3 and TiO2 deposition introduces only a small amount of disorder in EG, whereas Ta2O5 deposition appears to significantly degrade the quality of the underlying EG. Images adapted with permission from Ref. [34], Copyright American Chemical Society 2010.
Applsci 10 02440 g007
Applsci 10 02440 g008 550
Figure 8. (a) Raman spectra of as-grown EG, after physical vapor deposition (PVD) of 5 nm HfO2 and after HfO2-seeded (or Al2O3-seeded) ALD of HfO2 and Al2O3. (b) Hall mobility μHall vs. carrier density ns measured on as-grown EG, after electron beam physical vapor deposition (EBPVD) of oxide seed-layers and the complete oxide-seeded ALD (O-ALD) process. Images adapted with permission from Ref. [35], Copyright American Chemical Society 2010.
Figure 8. (a) Raman spectra of as-grown EG, after physical vapor deposition (PVD) of 5 nm HfO2 and after HfO2-seeded (or Al2O3-seeded) ALD of HfO2 and Al2O3. (b) Hall mobility μHall vs. carrier density ns measured on as-grown EG, after electron beam physical vapor deposition (EBPVD) of oxide seed-layers and the complete oxide-seeded ALD (O-ALD) process. Images adapted with permission from Ref. [35], Copyright American Chemical Society 2010.
Applsci 10 02440 g008
Applsci 10 02440 g009 550
Figure 9. (a) Representative AFM image of an EG surface prepared by UHV graphitization. (b) AFM images of EG surface after ALD of 25 cycles of Al2O3. (c) AFM images of EG surface immediately after PTCDA deposition and (d) following ALD of 25 cycles of Al2O3. (e) Al2O3 film thickness as a function of ALD growth cycle evaluated by spectroscopic ellipsometry on the bare EG, on PTCDA/EG and on a reference SiO2 surface. Images adapted with permission from Ref. [36], Copyright American Chemical Society 2011.
Figure 9. (a) Representative AFM image of an EG surface prepared by UHV graphitization. (b) AFM images of EG surface after ALD of 25 cycles of Al2O3. (c) AFM images of EG surface immediately after PTCDA deposition and (d) following ALD of 25 cycles of Al2O3. (e) Al2O3 film thickness as a function of ALD growth cycle evaluated by spectroscopic ellipsometry on the bare EG, on PTCDA/EG and on a reference SiO2 surface. Images adapted with permission from Ref. [36], Copyright American Chemical Society 2011.
Applsci 10 02440 g009
Applsci 10 02440 g010 550
Figure 10. C-AFM morphology (a) and current map (b) of Al2O3 deposited by 25 ALD cycles on the bare EG surface. Morphology (c) and current map (d) of Al2O3 deposited with the same number of cycles on the PTCDA/EG surface. Images adapted with permission from Ref. [36], copyright American Chemical Society 2011.
Figure 10. C-AFM morphology (a) and current map (b) of Al2O3 deposited by 25 ALD cycles on the bare EG surface. Morphology (c) and current map (d) of Al2O3 deposited with the same number of cycles on the PTCDA/EG surface. Images adapted with permission from Ref. [36], copyright American Chemical Society 2011.
Applsci 10 02440 g010
Applsci 10 02440 g011 550
Figure 11. (a) XPS spectra from C1s core-level for pristine EG on SiC(0001) (solid line) and after 20 O3 pulses at 250 °C. The two spectra are overlapped indicating negligible etching of graphene by the O3 treatment. (b) C 1s core level spectrum of EG after 20 O3 pulses at 350 °C, showing the appearance of an additional peak associated to uncovered SiC, which indicates partial etching of EG. (c) AFM image of a 50 nm thick Al2O3 film grown by 500 TMA/water cycles on EG pretreated with 20 O3 pulses at 250 °C. Figures adapted with permission from Ref [38], copyright Wiley 2010.
Figure 11. (a) XPS spectra from C1s core-level for pristine EG on SiC(0001) (solid line) and after 20 O3 pulses at 250 °C. The two spectra are overlapped indicating negligible etching of graphene by the O3 treatment. (b) C 1s core level spectrum of EG after 20 O3 pulses at 350 °C, showing the appearance of an additional peak associated to uncovered SiC, which indicates partial etching of EG. (c) AFM image of a 50 nm thick Al2O3 film grown by 500 TMA/water cycles on EG pretreated with 20 O3 pulses at 250 °C. Figures adapted with permission from Ref [38], copyright Wiley 2010.
Applsci 10 02440 g011
Applsci 10 02440 g012 550
Figure 12. XPS C1s spectra on as-grown EG (a) and after XeF2 exposure for 40 s (b), 120 s (c) and 200 s (d). AFM images of Al2O3 morphology for samples treated with varying amounts of fluorine: (e) no pretreatment and (f) 40 s XeF2 exposure results in large areas of no oxide deposition; (g) 120 s XeF2 exposure yields a conformal, uniform film and (h) 200 s XeF2 exposure shows pinholes throughout the oxide. Figures adapted with permission from Ref. [39], Copyright Elsevier 2012.
Figure 12. XPS C1s spectra on as-grown EG (a) and after XeF2 exposure for 40 s (b), 120 s (c) and 200 s (d). AFM images of Al2O3 morphology for samples treated with varying amounts of fluorine: (e) no pretreatment and (f) 40 s XeF2 exposure results in large areas of no oxide deposition; (g) 120 s XeF2 exposure yields a conformal, uniform film and (h) 200 s XeF2 exposure shows pinholes throughout the oxide. Figures adapted with permission from Ref. [39], Copyright Elsevier 2012.
Applsci 10 02440 g012
Table
Table 1. Overview of literature reports on atomic layer deposition (ALD) of dielectric materials on EG. Listed are the specs on EG growth process and number of graphene layers, the type of EG surface preparation used to achieve uniform ALD, the used ALD precursors and deposition temperatures, the thickness and uniformity of the deposited dielectric material, and whether EG was damaged by the surface preparation and/or the ALD process.
Table 1. Overview of literature reports on atomic layer deposition (ALD) of dielectric materials on EG. Listed are the specs on EG growth process and number of graphene layers, the type of EG surface preparation used to achieve uniform ALD, the used ALD precursors and deposition temperatures, the thickness and uniformity of the deposited dielectric material, and whether EG was damaged by the surface preparation and/or the ALD process.
RefEG/SiC(0001) SpecsALD Process
EG Surface PrepPrecursorsTALD (°C)InsulatorEG Damage
[38]EG growth at 1650 °C in Ar 1000 mbar, 1 L on SiC terraces, 2 L–3 L at SiC stepsNoneTrimethylaluminum/H2O, 500 cycles200, 300, 350Al2O3 (50 nm), not closedNo
[21]EG growth at 2000 °C in Ar 900 mbar, 1 L EG (>98%) with submicron 2 L patchesNoneTrimethylaluminum/H2O, 500 cycles250Al2O3 (12 nm), closed on >98% surfaceNo
[34]EG growth at 1600 °C in Ar 600 Torr, 1 L to 3 L EGOxidized Al seed layer, 2 nmTriethylaluminum/H2O150, 300Al2O3, closedNo
Oxidized Ti seed layer, 2 nmTitanium(IV) i-propoxide/H2O120, 250TiO2, closedNo
Oxidized Ta seed layer, 2 nmPentakis(dimethylamino)tantalum(V)150, 300Ta2O5, closed, high roughnessYes
[35]EG growth at 1600 °C in Ar 900 mbar, Few layers EGPVD Al2O3 seed layer, 2 nm Triethylaluminum/H2O300Al2O3 (8 nm) + Al2O3 seed (2 nm), closedNo
Tetrakis(dimethylamino)hafnium/H2O250HfO2 (8 nm) + Al2O3 seed (2 nm), closedNo
PVD HfO2 seed layer, 2 nmTriethylaluminum/H2O300Al2O3 (8 nm) + HfO2 seed (2 nm), closedNo
Tetrakis (dimethylamino)hafnium/H2O250HfO2 (8 nm) + HfO2 seed (2 nm), closedNo
PVD SiO2 seed layer, 2 nmTetrakis(dimethylamino)hafnium/H2O250HfO2 (10 nm) + SiO2 seed (2 nm), closedNo
[36]EG growth at 1350 °C in UHV, mixed 1 L–2 L EGOrganic seed layer: 1 L of perylene-3,4,9,10-tetracarboxylic dianhydride (PTCDA)Trimethylaluminum/H2O, 25 cycles100Al2O3 (2.3 nm), closedNo
Tetrakis(diethylamido)hafnium(IV), 25 cycles100HfO2 (2.5 nm), closedNo
[38]EG growth at 1650 °C in Ar 1000 mbar, 1 L on SiC terraces, 2 L–3 L at SiC stepsO3 prefunctionalization at T = 250 °CTrimethylaluminum/H2O, 500 cycles250Al2O3 (50 nm), closedNo
O3 prefunctionalization at T = 350 °CTrimethylaluminum/H2O, 500 cycles350Al2O3 (50 nm), closedYes
[39]EG growth at 1650 °C in Ar, 100 mbarFluorine prefunctionalization by XeF2 gas (from 0 to 200 s)Trimethylaluminum/H2O225Al2O3 (~15 nm), closedNo

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Giannazzo, F.; Schilirò, E.; Lo Nigro, R.; Roccaforte, F.; Yakimova, R. Atomic Layer Deposition of High-k Insulators on Epitaxial Graphene: A Review. Appl. Sci. 2020, 10, 2440. https://doi.org/10.3390/app10072440

AMA Style

Giannazzo F, Schilirò E, Lo Nigro R, Roccaforte F, Yakimova R. Atomic Layer Deposition of High-k Insulators on Epitaxial Graphene: A Review. Applied Sciences. 2020; 10(7):2440. https://doi.org/10.3390/app10072440

Chicago/Turabian Style

Giannazzo, Filippo, Emanuela Schilirò, Raffaella Lo Nigro, Fabrizio Roccaforte, and Rositsa Yakimova. 2020. "Atomic Layer Deposition of High-k Insulators on Epitaxial Graphene: A Review" Applied Sciences 10, no. 7: 2440. https://doi.org/10.3390/app10072440

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop