Next Article in Journal
Predicting and Modeling Wildfire Propagation Areas with BAT and Maximum-State PageRank
Next Article in Special Issue
A Metric and Visualization of Completeness in Multi-Dimensional Data Sets of Sensor and Actuator Data Applied to a Condition Monitoring Use Case
Previous Article in Journal
Edible Oils Differentiation Based on the Determination of Fatty Acids Profile and Raman Spectroscopy—A Case Study
Previous Article in Special Issue
Empowering Predictive Maintenance: A Hybrid Method to Diagnose Abnormal Situations

PrimaVera: Synergising Predictive Maintenance

Saxion University of Applied Sciences, 7513 AB Enschede, The Netherlands
Department of Industrial Engineering & Innovation Sciences, Eindhoven University of Technology, 5612 AZ Eindhoven, The Netherlands
The Hague University of Applied Sciences, 2521 EN Den Haag, The Netherlands
Department of Design, University of Twente, Production and Management, 7522 NB Enschede, The Netherlands
Department of Mathematics and Computer Science, Eindhoven University of Technology, 5612 AZ Eindhoven, The Netherlands
Royal Netherlands Aerospace Centre, 1059 CM Amsterdam, The Netherlands
Institute for Computing and Information Sciences, Radboud University, 6525 XZ Nijmegen, The Netherlands
Department of Mechanics of Solids, Surfaces & Systems, University of Twente, 7522 NB Enschede, The Netherlands
Formal Methods and Tools, University of Twente, 7522 NB Enschede, The Netherlands
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Appl. Sci. 2020, 10(23), 8348;
Received: 31 July 2020 / Revised: 5 November 2020 / Accepted: 19 November 2020 / Published: 24 November 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Overcoming the Obstacles to Predictive Maintenance)
The full potential of predictive maintenance has not yet been utilised. Current solutions focus on individual steps of the predictive maintenance cycle and only work for very specific settings. The overarching challenge of predictive maintenance is to leverage these individual building blocks to obtain a framework that supports optimal maintenance and asset management. The PrimaVera project has identified four obstacles to tackle in order to utilise predictive maintenance at its full potential: lack of orchestration and automation of the predictive maintenance workflow, inaccurate or incomplete data and the role of human and organisational factors in data-driven decision support tools. Furthermore, an intuitive generic applicable predictive maintenance process model is presented in this paper to provide a structured way of deploying predictive maintenance solutions. View Full-Text
Keywords: predictive maintenance; process model; interdisciplinary research; case studies predictive maintenance; process model; interdisciplinary research; case studies
Show Figures

Figure 1

MDPI and ACS Style

Ton, B.; Basten, R.; Bolte, J.; Braaksma, J.; Di Bucchianico, A.; van de Calseyde, P.; Grooteman, F.; Heskes, T.; Jansen, N.; Teeuw, W.; Tinga, T.; Stoelinga, M. PrimaVera: Synergising Predictive Maintenance. Appl. Sci. 2020, 10, 8348.

AMA Style

Ton B, Basten R, Bolte J, Braaksma J, Di Bucchianico A, van de Calseyde P, Grooteman F, Heskes T, Jansen N, Teeuw W, Tinga T, Stoelinga M. PrimaVera: Synergising Predictive Maintenance. Applied Sciences. 2020; 10(23):8348.

Chicago/Turabian Style

Ton, Bram, Rob Basten, John Bolte, Jan Braaksma, Alessandro Di Bucchianico, Philippe van de Calseyde, Frank Grooteman, Tom Heskes, Nils Jansen, Wouter Teeuw, Tiedo Tinga, and Mariëlle Stoelinga. 2020. "PrimaVera: Synergising Predictive Maintenance" Applied Sciences 10, no. 23: 8348.

Find Other Styles
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

Back to TopTop