1. Introduction
Recent progress in technical control has offered possibilities for studying the interactions between pure quantum mechanical systems and their coupling to reservoirs, which can be extended as unique tools for quantum sensing [
1]. Alkali metal atoms are convenient, in terms of the technical requirements needed for sensors. Neutral atoms in chip-scale atomic vapor have been utilized as a device for many applications, including atomic clocks [
2], atomic magnetometers cell [
3], and for radio-frequency (RF) fields sensors [
4]. Atom-based electromagnetic field sensor technologies hold great promise for realizing such applications. The most advanced experimental demonstrations include high dynamic field ranges (exceeding 120 dB), high-intensity RF fields (up to 10 kV/m) [
5], broadband RF detection (on the order of THz) [
6], and high sensitivity (
V· cm
−1/Hz
1/2 [
4,
7]. Recent advances have experimentally achieved sensitivities of 55 nV · cm
−1/ Hz
1/2, which approaches the quantum projection noise limit [
8]; however, going beyond this, it is possible by using squeezed states or Schrodinger-cat states of light field [
9].
Recent advances have provided new capabilities in RF or microwave (MW) sensing. Typical high-frequency microwave fields have a wavelength range on the order of millimeters or centimeters. In chip-scale atomic vapor cell, the signal is limited by atomic density. In contrast to the characteristics of atomic spin, Rydberg atoms with high principal quantum number have exaggerated characteristics including dipole–dipole or Van der Waals interactions [
10]. Using a buffer-gas-filled cell to improve atomic coherence is not feasible, as collision will destroy the electric dipole coherence. The high atomic density can be obtained by ultraviolet light desorption effect or heating the atomic vapor cell. Under high-density atomic gas, the sensing accuracy and sensitivity are limited by the spectral broadening [
11], including Doppler broadening, collision broadening, and interaction dephasing induced by Rydberg atom collisions. The dephasing observed in the experiments has been explained by averaging the effects resulting from Van den Waals interaction of Rydberg–Rydberg interaction or coupling between Rydberg atoms and the inner surface of the glass cell [
12,
13,
14].
In this paper, by measuring the Rydberg electromagnetically-induced-transparency (EIT) signal, we observed Rydberg level shift caused by Stark interaction of Rydberg atoms and the mean electric field which is generated by Rydberg atom collision induced ionization in a cesium atomic ensemble. The results are obtained by means of Doppler-free spectroscopy with high signal-to-noise ratio, which is essential for high-precision measurements. Understanding the microscopic mechanism of charged particles production in thermal Rydberg atomic vapor and its corresponding electric field distribution is an important part of future experiments and applications.
2. Setup and Measurement
The experimental setup is shown in
Figure 1. An external-cavity diode laser (ECDL) at 852 nm is used as a probe laser with a typical linewidth of ∼90 kHz. The optical power of a 1018-nm ECDL is amplified to ∼5 W by a fiber amplifier(FA), and then frequency-doubled by a single-passed periodically poled lithium niobate (PPLN) crystal to 509 nm. The two beams are overlapped in cesium (Cs) atomic vapor in a counter-propagating configuration. The spherical cesium cell has a radius of ∼1.2 cm to match the Rayleigh length of the focused beams (∼40
m waist radius). We first performed the saturation absorption spectroscopy and determined the zero detuning of the 852-nm probe laser. The wavelength meter (HighFinesse WS-7, with wavelength deviation sensitivity of about 10 MHz) was calibrated using the Cs
hyperfine transition line. With the calibrated wavelength meter, we measured the wavelength of probe beam (when set to a certain detuning) and the coupling beam. The ladder-type Rydberg EIT signal is observed by scanning the frequency of 509-nm coupling laser while the 852-nm probe laser’s frequency is fixed. The background-free EIT spectrum with high signal-to-noise ratio can be regarded as a low-noise detection system, which decreases the intensity noise and phase noise.
Figure 2 shows the relevant energy level schematic and the transmitted intensity of a typical Rydberg EIT signal at 25 °C. The linewidth of the EIT signal is about 10 MHz, as measured by a RF modulation spectroscopy.
We study the relationship between the Rydberg EIT signal and the temperature as well as laser detuning in a ladder-type system.
Figure 3a shows the dependence of the Rydberg EIT signal on probe detuning at a cell temperature of 40 °C, where each small peak in the figure represents an EIT signal. Zero detuning of the probe laser is identical with the Cs
cascade resonance transition. We fix the 852-nm laser frequency at a chosen detuning and scan the 509-nm laser frequency in order to get EIT signal. When the detuning of the probe laser is ∼260 MHz, the EIT signal’s strength is the largest, which is caused by the electric field generated by the collisions of Rydberg atoms causing the Rydberg level shift, a detailed explanation can be found in the discussion part. In
Figure 3b, only the envelope curves are shown, for 40, 60, and 80 °C.
Figure 3c shows that the 852-nm laser detuning for the maximum intensity of EIT signals changed with temperature (ground-state atomic density). It can be seen that probe laser detuning with the maximum EIT signal intensity increased nearly linear with increasing temperature. For example, at temperature of 90 °C, the probe laser detuning with the maximum EIT signal intensity is ∼510 MHz. Under high temperature conditions, the Rydberg EIT signal for the Cs
cascade transition (zero detuning of the probe laser) is very weak. We observe that the linewidth of the EIT signal does not change significantly as the temperature increases, and is ∼10 MHz. There is no obvious linewidth broadening, which means that the electric field-induced shift is not a dissipative process.
3. Analysis and Discussions
The most advanced experiments demonstrate that collisions in a Rydberg atomic ensemble will yield ionization which will produce positive ions and electrons [
15]. We know that, under the conditions of a weak electric field, the Rydberg level shift will be dominated by Stark shift. The dependence of the Rydberg level shift on the weak electric field can be measured by Rydberg EIT spectroscopy. We expand this idea and use a semi-classical model to explain the physical phenomena of the Rydberg level shift. In a thermal Rydberg atomic ensemble, the collisions between Rydberg atoms and the collisions between Rydberg atoms and ground-state atoms induce charged particles (positive ions and electrons), which cause avalanche ionization [
15,
16,
17]. Here, the photo-ionization process is very weak, it can be ignored. In our system, the Rydberg atomic density is obtained by the combined effect of the ground-state cesium atomic density and the two-step Rydberg excitation
, under the premise that the other experimental conditions (i.e., probe Rabi frequency and coupling Rabi frequency) remain unchanged, and ionization leads to the reduction of the Rydberg atomic density.
In the theoretical model, positive ions and electrons will generate an inhomogeneous local electric field in the local space of the atomic vapor, and the local electric field interesting with Rydberg atoms will reduce the Rydberg energy and cause a Rydberg level shift. We assume the electron density and the positive ion density to be equal, and both parameters are given by
. The dependence of charged particles’density and Rydberg atomic density can be obtained by solving the following rate equations [
15]:
where
and
are Rydberg atom density and induced density of charged particles, respectively.
is the ground-state atomic density;
is cross-section for Rydberg-ground state atomic collisions,
is geometric cross-section of Rydberg atomic collisions [
18,
19],
is the mean relative velocity of Rydberg atoms colliding with ground-state atoms, and
is the mean relative velocity of Rydberg atoms colliding with other Rydberg atoms. The expected value of
is 0.06
[
15], with
[
15,
20] (where
is the Bohr radius) being the geometric cross-section of Rydberg state with an effective principal quantum number
.
is the Rydberg component in superposition dark state of EIT, where
is two-photon detuning. Here,
contains charged particles recombination and decay, and the rate
represents the losses in the charged particle.
is the charged particle diffusion rate. The most obvious contribution is that
describes the motional decay parameters of charged particles leaving the interaction volume due to thermal motion, which vary slightly with temperature. The value of
is ∼0.25 MHz. The second term in
is represented by 2
, which describes the recombination of ions with electrons into neutral particles. Here,
is the Boltzmann constant,
is the electron mass,
is the charged particles population, and we take
1 in our model. The expected value for
can be estimated [
21] in a semi-classical treatment with Kramer’s formula. Compared with the ion diffusion rate of 0.25 MHz, 2
is very small and can be ignored.
We obtain the densities of charged particles and Rydberg atoms according to the rate equations, as shown in
Figure 4a. It can be seen that the Rydberg atomic density increases first nearly linear with increasing temperature, but at relatively high temperature, this changes to a slowly increase. This may be caused by the different two-step Rydberg excitation (i.e., laser Rabi frequency remains constant, but the single-photon detuning is quite different). The single-photon detuning is relatively small under low temperature conditions, so that the two-step Rydberg excitation is relatively strong, which is just the opposite situation under high-temperature conditions. According to Rydberg atomic density, we can calculate Rydberg level shift for the 50
state [
22], within a short-distance range, it is a dipole–dipole interaction, which is proportional to 1/
. The theoretical result is shown in
Figure 4b. In the long-distance range, it is Van der Waals interaction, which is proportional to 1/
. It can be seen that the Rydberg level shift due to dipole–dipole interaction is much smaller than our measured values. Therefore, it is impossible to cause a Rydberg level shift of several hundred MHz. Therefore, the Rydberg level shift caused by the interaction between Rydberg atoms is not the main factor than our measured values. Here, considering the quantum defect of the Rydberg atoms, we know that there are two types of interaction between the outermost electron of the alkali-metal Rydberg atom and its nucleus: penetration and polarization. As a result of these two effects, the atomic binding energy increases and total energy reduces (quantum defect) [
23,
24]. However, in general, the energy loss caused by the quantum defect is very small, so the effect of quantum defect can also be ignored.
Based on the calculated density of charged particles, the inhomogeneous electric field is
[
25,
26], where
is the vacuum dielectric constant,
e is the charge of electron. In low electric fields, Stark shift of the Rydberg state
is given by second order perturbation theory [
27] to be
, where
is the atomic polarizability of Rydberg state. Referring to the related literature ref. [
28], the value for
can be estimated; the polarizability of 50
Rydberg state is ∼54.33 MHz·cm
2/V
2. The dependence of Rydberg level shift on the density of charged particles can be given as follows [
25,
26,
27]:
We calculate Rydberg level shift
according to Equation (
3), as shown in
Figure 4c. with
= 5.0 MHz,
= 36.0 MHz. The blue solid circles in the figure are Rydberg level shifts obtained under seven temperature conditions in
Figure 3c; the black squares show the calculated mean electric fields.
Laser beams with different frequencies will interact with atoms of different velocity groups [
29,
30]. We can change the frequency detuning of the coupling laser
by controlling the frequency detuning of the probe laser
, as the Rydberg level shift can also react to the frequency detuning of the probe laser. Therefore, according to the theoretical simulation, we find
, where
is the 852-nm probe detuning of the maximum EIT signal intensity. Therefore, Rydberg level shift
is caused by the mean electric field generated by the collisions induced ionization, such that the probe laser is in resonance with the Cs
transition, while the coupling laser is in resonance with the Cs
Rydberg transition, satisfying the two-photon resonance condition, the intensity of EIT signal is the strongest under this condition.
We study the relationship between the Rydberg level shift and detuning of the probe laser that produces the EIT signal of maximum intensity multiplied by the Doppler mismatch factor, as shown in
Figure 5. The blue solid circles indicate the change of Rydberg level shift
with density of charged particles, while the red squares indicate the change of probe laser detuning multiplied by the Doppler mismatch factor with density of charged particles, that is, how
varied with density of charged particles. It can be seen that, with the change of density of charged particles, Rydberg level shift and detuning of probe laser multiplied by the Doppler mismatch factor are approximately equal. The solid black line is the fitting of the change of
with the density of charged particles by using Equation (
3). In our experimental system, the main deviation is inaccuracy of the temperature control of the atomic vapor cell. For the red detuning for Rydberg state 50
, there is also an energy shift and maximum intensity of Rydberg EIT signal. For the case of the Cs
Rydberg transition, the red detuning of ~500 MHz is corresponding to the blue detuning of the Cs
Rydberg transition. With Rydberg EIT spectra, it is difficult to eliminate the influence of hyperfine folds in 6
state. Therefore, the detailed discussion is not performed on the red detuning case for 50
Rydberg state.