Next Article in Journal
Toxic Corporate Culture: Assessing Organizational Processes of Deviancy
Next Article in Special Issue
Risk Assessment in PPP Projects by Applying Different MCDM Methods and Comparative Results Analysis
Previous Article in Journal
The Effects of Knowledge Sharing on Individual Creativity in Higher Education Institutions: Socio-Technical View
Communication

Development and Introduction of the Risk-Sentience Auxiliary Framework (RSAF) as an Enabler to the ISO 31000 and ISO 31010 for High-Risk Environments

Risk and Quality Advisor, Health Service Executive (HSE), Community Healthcare—Dublin South, Kildare & West Wicklow, Kildare W91KDC2, Ireland
Adm. Sci. 2018, 8(2), 22; https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci8020022
Received: 11 May 2018 / Revised: 13 June 2018 / Accepted: 13 June 2018 / Published: 16 June 2018
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Rational Decision Making in Risk Management)
The aim of this study was to develop, implement, and evaluate a new auxiliary enterprise risk management framework and process to serve as an enabler to the global ISO 31000 risk framework and ISO 31010 processes. This framework has been designed particularly for use within high-risk environments and those characterized by volatility, uncertainty, complexity, and ambiguity (VUCA). This paper proposes a methodology for optimization of structured sharing and grass-roots management of all available risk-sentience information with the assessed potential to develop into an identifiable risk in the future. The author introduces new risk terminology including risk-sentience, risk-sentience information, and risk-sentience management. The process involved the development of the Theory of Risk-Sentience (ToRS), Risk-Sentience Auxiliary Framework (RSAF) and a risk-sentience management process referred to as LUOMEAR (Learning from Uncertainties, Others Mistakes, Experiences and Anecdotal Reporting). Manchester Patient Safety Framework (MaPSaF), SWOT (Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities, and Threats) analysis, and a newly developed Risk-Sentience Fertility Checklist were used to conduct pre and post-trial evaluations. The findings include positive adjustments in safety culture, components of commitment to quality, communication and team-working around safety issues, access to evolving risk-information, and efficient sharing and management of recorded risk-information. Recommendations are made for more extensive application of both the proposed auxiliary risk framework and process within high-risk sectors to further explore its effectiveness and scope. View Full-Text
Keywords: uncertainty management; risk management; safety; ISO 31000:2009; ISO 31010:2009; risk management framework; risk-sentience; safety culture; risk culture; enterprise risk management uncertainty management; risk management; safety; ISO 31000:2009; ISO 31010:2009; risk management framework; risk-sentience; safety culture; risk culture; enterprise risk management
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

MDPI and ACS Style

Selvaseelan, J. Development and Introduction of the Risk-Sentience Auxiliary Framework (RSAF) as an Enabler to the ISO 31000 and ISO 31010 for High-Risk Environments. Adm. Sci. 2018, 8, 22. https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci8020022

AMA Style

Selvaseelan J. Development and Introduction of the Risk-Sentience Auxiliary Framework (RSAF) as an Enabler to the ISO 31000 and ISO 31010 for High-Risk Environments. Administrative Sciences. 2018; 8(2):22. https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci8020022

Chicago/Turabian Style

Selvaseelan, Jerry. 2018. "Development and Introduction of the Risk-Sentience Auxiliary Framework (RSAF) as an Enabler to the ISO 31000 and ISO 31010 for High-Risk Environments" Adm. Sci. 8, no. 2: 22. https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci8020022

Find Other Styles
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

1
Search more from Scilit
 
Search
Back to TopTop