Speaking the Right Digital Language: How Post Format and Communication Impact University Facebook Engagement
Abstract
1. Introduction
Research Objectives
- To compare engagement levels on Facebook between public and private HEIs in the UAE. This includes analyzing and contrasting key engagement metrics for public vs. private universities in order to detect the differences in audience interaction.
- To evaluate the effectiveness of different Facebook post formats, such as posts with text only, posts with images, video posts, and link-sharing posts, in terms of boosting engagement through emotes, comments, and shares.
- To examine the influence of language on user interaction and reactions. Specifically, the study will assess whether posts published in English versus those in Arabic result in different engagement outcomes.
- To qualitatively analyze the themes and messaging content of universities’ posts. Through content analysis of the posts’ textual content, the study will identify common themes and assess how these thematic elements correlate with engagement.
2. Literature Review
2.1. Theoretical Framework
2.2. Facebook Content for Higher Education
2.3. User Reactions to Facebook Posts
3. Methods
3.1. Context and Procedure
3.2. Sample and Data Collection and Data Analysis
3.3. Theme Definitions
- Announcements: This theme covers official informational posts, including administrative messages such as messages from the university president or policy updates, besides messages related to student recruitment or admissions notices.
- Education: This theme covers academic offerings and learning opportunities and includes content such as promotion of academic programs or courses, information about new curricula, and encouragement of online learning or e-learning platforms.
- Events: This theme covers all posts related to events and activities reflecting campus life and engagement. It includes academic events such as conferences, seminars, workshops, guest lectures, and webinars hosted by the university, as well as non-academic or social events such as sports tournaments, cultural festivals, student club activities, graduation ceremonies, and national celebrations like UAE National Day.
- Faculty and Research: This theme covers all posts related to university faculty members and research output. The posts include faculty achievements, such as receiving an award or being featured in media, along with posts related to research activities such as studies conducted by the university, publications, innovations, or research collaborations.
- Reputation and Social Responsibility: This theme covers all content aimed at building and maintaining the university’s public image and societal role. It includes posts related to campus facilities and resources, such as opening a new building or lab; in addition, it covers institutional achievements such as rankings, accreditations, and awards earned by the university, and also includes alumni success stories and partnerships or industry relations.
4. Results
4.1. HEI Facebook Post Characteristics
4.2. Public (PU) and Private (PV) HEIs’ Post Reactions
4.3. Public (PU) and Private (PV) HEI Reactions Based on Post Language
4.4. Public (PU) and Private (PV) HEI Reactions Based on Post Format
4.5. Post Content Analysis
5. Discussion
6. Conclusions
Limitations and Future Research
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Almeida, E., & Morais, N. S. (2020). The use of facebook and instagram in communication with new students: The case of portuguese public universities. SIIE, 27(33). [Google Scholar]
- Alsufyan, N. K., & Aloud, M. (2017). The state of social media engagement in Saudi universities. Journal of Applied Research in Higher Education, 9(2), 267–303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ashour, S. (2020). Quality higher education is the foundation of a knowledge society: Where does the UAE stand? Quality in Higher Education, 26(2), 209–223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bélanger, C. H., Bali, S., & Longden, B. (2014). How Canadian universities use social media to brand themselves. Tertiary Education and Management, 20(1), 14–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Brindley, P., Cameron, R. W., Ersoy, E., Jorgensen, A., & Maheswaran, R. (2019). Is more always better? Exploring field survey and social media indicators of quality of urban greenspace, in relation to health. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 39, 45–54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bularca, M. C., Nechita, F., Sargu, L., Motoi, G., Otovescu, A., & Coman, C. (2022). Looking for the sustainability messages of European universities’ social media communication during the COVID-19 pandemic. Sustainability, 14(3), 1554. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Burke, M., & Kraut, R. E. (2016). The relationship between Facebook use and well-being depends on communication type and tie strength. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 21(4), 265–281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Capriotti, P., Martínez-Gras, R., & Zeler, I. (2023). Does universities’ posting strategy influence their social media engagement? An analysis of the top-ranked higher education institutions in different countries. Higher Education Quarterly, 77(4), 911–931. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Carah, N. (2014). Like, comment, share: Alcohol brand activity on Facebook. Foundation for Alcohol Research and Education. Available online: https://www.fare.org.au/wp-content/uploads/Facebook-and-alcohol-advertising-report.pdf (accessed on 19 July 2025).
- Chapleo, C., Durán, M. V. C., & Díaz, A. C. (2011). Do UK universities communicate their brands effectively through their websites? Journal of Marketing for Higher Education, 21(1), 25–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cheung, M. L., Pires, G., & Rosenberger, P. J. (2020). The influence of perceived social media marketing elements on consumer–brand engagement and brand knowledge. Asia Pacific Journal of Marketing and Logistics, 32(3), 695–720. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- CNET. (2022, April 17). Facebook adds new care emoji to show support during coronavirus. Available online: https://www.cnet.com/tech/services-and-software/facebook-adds-new-care-emoji-to-show-support-during-coronavirus/ (accessed on 19 July 2025).
- Daft, R. L., & Lengel, R. H. (1983). Information richness. A new approach to managerial behavior and organization design (Technical Report No. TR-ONR-DG-02). Department of Management, College of Business Administration, Texas A&M University, for the Office of Naval Research. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Delello, J. A., & McWhorter, R. R. (2017). Reducing the digital divide: Connecting older adults to iPad technology. Journal of Applied Gerontology, 36(1), 3–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- De Vries, L., Gensler, S., & Leeflang, P. S. H. (2012). Popularity of brand posts on brand fan pages: An investigation of the effects of social media marketing. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 26(2), 83–91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Eger, L., Egerová, D., Tomczyk, L., & Krystoň, M. (2021). How universities communicate with public using Facebook page. International Journal of Media and Information Literacy, 6(1), 88–99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ellison, N. B., Gibbs, J. L., & Weber, M. S. (2015). The use of enterprise social network sites for knowledge sharing in distributed organizations: The role of organizational affordances. American Behavioral Scientist, 59(1), 103–123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ellison, N. B., Gray, R., Vitak, J., Lampe, C., & Fiore, A. T. (2013, July 8–11). Calling all Facebook friends: Exploring requests for help on Facebook. 7th International Conference on Weblogs and Social Media (ICWSM 2013), Cambridge, MA, USA. Available online: https://ojs.aaai.org/index.php/ICWSM/article/view/14436/14285 (accessed on 19 July 2025).
- Fähnrich, B., Vogelgesang, J., & Scharkow, M. (2020). Evaluating universities’ strategic online communication: How do Shanghai Ranking’s top 50 universities grow stakeholder engagement with Facebook posts? Journal of Communication Management, 24(3), 265–283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Frison, E., & Eggermont, S. (2015). The impact of daily stress on adolescents’ depressed mood: The role of social support seeking through Facebook. Computers in Human Behavior, 44, 315–325. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gharbi, I., Al-Kilani, M. H., AbuDaabes, A. S., & Ismail, W. S. (2023). Facebook posts for academic and non-academic events: Higher education institutions in Abu Dhabi. In A. Hamdan, H. M. Shoaib, B. Alareeni, & R. Hamdan (Eds.), The implementation of smart technologies for business success and sustainability (Vol. 216, pp. 441–449). SSDC. Springer. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- GMI. (2023). United Arab Emirates (UAE) social media statistics 2023. GMI. Available online: https://www.globalmediainsight.com/blog/uae-social-media-statistics/ (accessed on 19 July 2025).
- GMI. (2025). United Arab Emirates (UAE) population statistics 2025. GMI. Available online: https://www.globalmediainsight.com/blog/uae-population-statistics/ (accessed on 19 July 2025).
- Graham, K., Stuart, G., & McAdie, T. (2023). New resilience for the new normal: Online students’ early strategies for course persistence at the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of College Student Retention: Research, Theory & Practice. Advance online publication. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gunn, A. (2018). Metrics and methodologies for measuring teaching quality in higher education: Developing the Teaching Excellence Framework (TEF). Educational Review, 70(2), 129–148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Halaweh, M., Elbahi, M., Kamel, A., Kabha, R., & Yousef, R. (2020). Exploring the use of social media platforms by public universities. International Journal of Web Portals, 12(2), 41–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hanandeh, A., Al-Badaineh, G., Kilani, Q., AL Freijat, S. Y., Abualfalayeh, G., & Khasawneh, M. A. S. (2024). The effects of social media platforms in influencing consumer behavior and improving business objectives. International Journal of Data and Network Science, 8(4), 2333–2340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Joo, S., Choi, N., & Baek, T. H. (2018). Library marketing via social media: The relationships between Facebook content and user engagement in public libraries. Online Information Review, 42(6), 940–955. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kaur, W., Balakrishnan, V., Rana, O., & Sinniah, A. (2019). Liking, sharing, commenting and reacting on Facebook: User behaviors’ impact on sentiment intensity. Telematics and Informatics, 39, 25–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kearsley, G., & Shneiderman, B. (1998). Engagement theory: A framework for technology-based teaching and learning. Educational Technology, 38(5), 20–23. [Google Scholar]
- Khobzi, H., Lau, R. Y. K., & Cheung, T. C. H. (2019). The outcome of pages: A study of user engagement behavior. Internet Research, 29(1), 2–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Khobzi, H., & Teimourpour, B. (2015). LCP segmentation: A framework for evaluation of user engagement in online social networks. Computers in Human Behavior, 50, 101–107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kim, C., & Yang, S. U. (2017). Like, comment, and share on Facebook: How each behavior differs from the other. Public Relations Review, 43(2), 441–449. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Krebs, F., Lubascher, B., Moers, T., Schaap, P., & Spanakis, G. (2018). Social emotion mining techniques for facebook posts reaction prediction. In ICAART 2018–Proceedings of the 10th international conference on agents and artificial intelligence (Vol. 2, pp. 211–220). SciTePress. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kummitha, H. R., Kolloju, N., Chittoor, P., & Madepalli, V. (2021). Coronavirus disease 2019 and its effect on teaching and learning process in the higher educational institutions. Higher Education for the Future, 8(1), 90–107. [Google Scholar]
- Landwehr, P., & Carley, K. (2014). Social media in disaster relief usage patterns, data mining tools, and current research directions. Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery for Big Data Studies in Big Data, 1, 225–257. Available online: https://www.cs.cmu.edu/~plandweh/pdfs/SMIDR-landwehr-DMAKDBD-preprint.pdf (accessed on 19 July 2025).
- Lantz-Andersson, A. (2018). Language play in a second language: Social media as contexts for emerging sociopragmatic competence. Education and Information Technologies, 23(2), 705–724. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lappas, G., Wolfs, C. J. A., Staut, N., Lieuwes, N. G., Biemans, R., van Hoof, S. J., Dubois, L. J., & Verhaegen, F. (2022). Automatic contouring of normal tissues with deep learning for preclinical radiation studies. Physics in Medicine & Biology, 67(4), 045017. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Maresova, P., Hruska, J., & Kuca, K. (2020). Social media university branding. Education Sciences, 10(3), 74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mcgee, A., Haworth, P., & Macintyre, L. (2015). Leadership practices to support teaching and learning for english language learners. TESOL Quarterly, 49(1), 92–114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mehmood, S., Ahmad, I., Khan, M. A., Khan, F., & Whangbo, T. (2022). Sentiment analysis in social media for competitive environment using content analysis. Computers, Materials and Continua, 71(2), 5603–5618. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Papademetriou, C., Anastasiadou, S., Konteos, G., & Papalexandris, S. (2022). COVID-19 pandemic: The impact of the social media technology on higher education. Education Sciences, 12(4), 261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Peruta, A., & Shields, A. B. (2017). Social media in higher education: Understanding how colleges and universities use Facebook. Journal of Marketing for Higher Education, 27(1), 131–143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Peruta, A., & Shields, A. B. (2018). Marketing your university on social media: A content analysis of Facebook post types and formats. Journal of Marketing for Higher Education, 28(2), 175–191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Peters, R., & De Albuquerque, J. P. (2015). Investigating images as indicators for relevant social media messages in disaster management [Short paper]. In L. Palen, M. Büscher, T. Comes, & A. Hughes (Eds.), Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Information Systems for Crisis Response and Management (ISCRAM 2015). University of Agder. Available online: https://www.idl.iscram.org/files/robinpeters/2015/1240_RobinPeters+JoaoPortodeAlbuquerque2015.pdf (accessed on 19 July 2025).
- Pletikosa Cvijikj, I., & Michahelles, F. (2013). Online engagement factors on Facebook brand pages. Social Network Analysis and Mining, 3(4), 843–861. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Raza, S. A., Qazi, W., Shah, N., Qureshi, M. A., Qaiser, S., & Ali, R. (2020). Drivers of intensive Facebook usage among university students: An implications of U&G and TPB theories. Technology in Society, 62, 101331. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rus, H. M., & Cameron, L. D. (2016). Health communication in social media: Message features predicting user engagement on diabetes-related Facebook pages. Annals of Behavioral Medicine, 50(5), 678–689. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sabate, F., Berbegal-Mirabent, J., Cañabate, A., & Lebherz, P. R. (2014). Factors influencing popularity of branded content in Facebook fan pages. European Management Journal, 32(6), 1001–1011. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Siemund, P., Al-Issa, A., Rahbari, S., & Leimgruber, J. R. E. (2021). Multilingualism and the role of English in the United Arab Emirates. World Englishes, 40(2), 191–204. Available online: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/weng.12507 (accessed on 19 July 2025).
- Smoliarova, A. S., Gromova, T. M., & Pavlushkina, N. A. (2018). Emotional stimuli in social media user behavior: Emoji reactions on a news media facebook page. In Lecture notes in computer science (including subseries lecture notes in artificial intelligence and lecture notes in bioinformatics): Vol. 11193 LNCS (Issue 1, pp. 242–256). Springer International Publishing. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sörensen, I., Fürst, S., Vogler, D., & Schäfer, M. S. (2023). Higher education institutions on Facebook, Instagram, and Twitter: Comparing Swiss universities’ social media communication. Media and Communication, 11(1), 264–277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Spottswood, E., & Wohn, D. Y. (2019). Beyond the “Like”: How people respond to negative posts on Facebook. Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic Media, 63(2), 250–267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sturm Wilkerson, H., Riedl, M. J., & Whipple, K. N. (2021). Affective affordances: Exploring Facebook reactions as emotional responses to hyperpartisan political news. Digital Journalism, 9(8), 1040–1061. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Taecharungroj, V. (2017). Higher education social media marketing: 12 content types universities post on Facebook. International Journal of Management in Education, 11(2), 111–127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Thomas, D. M., & Mathur, S. (2019, June 12–14). Data analysis by web scraping using Python. 3rd International Conference on Electronics and Communication and Aerospace Technology, ICECA 2019 (pp. 450–454), Coimbatore, India. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Valerio, G., Herrera-murillo, D. J., Villanueva-puente, F., Herrera-murillo, N., & Rodríguez-martínez, M. C. (2015). The relationship between post formats and digital engagement: A study of the Facebook pages of Mexican universities. RUSC. Universities and Knowledge Society Journal, 12(1), 50–63. [Google Scholar]
- Wahid, R. M., & Gunarto, M. (2022). Factors driving social media engagement on Instagram: Evidence from an emerging market. Journal of Global Marketing, 35(2), 169–191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zell, A. L., & Moeller, L. (2018). Are you happy for me … on Facebook? The potential importance of “likes” and comments. Computers in Human Behavior, 78, 26–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Posts’ Reactions | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Variable | N | Percentage | Min–Max | |
Emotes | 177,022 | 87% | 0–17,696 | |
Likes | 154,638 | 87.4% | 0–14,000 | |
Loves | 19,060 | 10.8% | 0–3600 | |
Wow | 660 | 0.4% | 0–96 | |
Cares | 803 | 0.5% | 0–129 | |
Sad | 368 | 0.2% | 0–106 | |
Angry | 13 | 0.0% | 0–4 | |
Haha | 1480 | 0.8% | 0–386 | |
Shares | 17,269 | 9% | 0–2000 | |
Comments | 8374 | 4% | 0–943 | |
Posts’ Format | ||||
Plain text | 25 | 0.5% | ||
Post including link | 1305 | 23.9% | ||
Post including video | 913 | 16.7% | ||
Post including image | 3208 | 58.9% | ||
Public (PU) and Private (PV) HEIs | ||||
Private HEIs posts | 2901 | 69.9% | ||
Public HEIs posts | 1247 | 30.1% | ||
Posts’ Language | ||||
English | 1494 | 36% | ||
Arabic | 827 | 20% | ||
English and Arabic | 1825 | 44% |
Emotes | Comments | Shares | |||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Mean | SD | T | Df | Sig | Mean | SD | T | Df | Sig | Mean | SD | t | Df | Sig | |
PV | 53.77 | 366.66 | 4.86 | 3940.08 | 0.00 | 2.50 | 21.47 | 3.81 | 3433.29 | 0.00 | 5.34 | 50.03 | 4.18 | 3027.47 | 0.00 |
PU | 16.86 | 118.59 | 0.90 | 4.47 | 1.42 | 4.90 |
Emotes | Comments | Shares | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Sig | Did Not Receive Emotes | Received Emotes | Sig | Did not Receive Comments | Received Comments | Sig | Not Shared | Shared | |
PV | 0.105 | 3.4% | 96.6% | p < 0.001 | 63.3% | 36.7% | p < 0.001 | 40.0% | 60.0% |
PU | 2.5% | 97.5% | 71.1% | 28.9% | 54.1% | 45.9% |
Emotes | Comments | Shares | |||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Mean | SD | T | Df | Sig | Mean | SD | T | Df | Sig | Mean | SD | T | Df | Sig | |
No English | 31.73 | 158.49 | −1.12 | 4146.0 | 0.26 | 1.43 | 5.64 | −1.05 | 4146.0 | 0.30 | 2.34 | 7.14 | −2.68 | 3832.7 | 0.01 |
English | 45.41 | 341.82 | 2.17 | 20.07 | 4.62 | 46.77 | |||||||||
No Arabic | 30.30 | 100.50 | −2.45 | 3249.6 | 0.01 | 1.49 | 12.21 | −1.60 | 4137.9 | 0.11 | 3.02 | 13.93 | −1.69 | 3290.5 | 0.09 |
Arabic | 49.65 | 384.96 | 2.31 | 20.73 | 4.81 | 51.40 |
Emotes | Comments | Shares | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Sig | Not Used | Used | Sig | Not Used | Used | Sig | Not Used | Used | |
No English | 0.029 | 4.3% | 95.7% | 0.044 | 68.6% | 31.4% | 0.177 | 46.3% | 53.7% |
English | 2.9% | 97.1% | 64.9% | 35.1% | 43.7% | 56.3% | |||
No Arabic | 0.039 | 2.4% | 97.6% | 0.688 | 66.1% | 33.9% | 0.438 | 43.4% | 56.6% |
Arabic | 3.6% | 96.4% | 65.4% | 34.6% | 44.7% | 55.3% |
Emotes | Comments | Shares | |||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Mean | SD | T | Df | Sig | Mean | SD | T | Df | Sig | Mean | SD | T | Df | Sig | |
No image | 35.54 | 148.32 | −0.79 | 4146.00 | 0.43 | 1.58 | 7.96 | −0.84 | 4146.00 | 0.40 | 5.12 | 67.39 | 0.80 | 4146.00 | 0.43 |
Image | 44.77 | 347.77 | 2.15 | 20.16 | 3.88 | 30.77 | |||||||||
No video | 44.69 | 346.23 | 0.78 | 4146.00 | 0.44 | 2.13 | 20.08 | 0.77 | 4146.00 | 0.44 | 3.87 | 30.64 | −0.86 | 4146.00 | 0.39 |
Video | 35.54 | 151.18 | 1.61 | 8.09 | 5.21 | 68.39 | |||||||||
No link | 38.86 | 143.60 | −0.83 | 1396.83 | 0.41 | 2.08 | 20.83 | 0.34 | 4146.00 | 0.73 | 4.10 | 41.30 | −0.15 | 4146.00 | 0.88 |
Link | 51.00 | 517.97 | 1.88 | 9.98 | 4.30 | 43.38 |
Emotes | Comments | Shares | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Sig | Not Used | Used | Sig | Not Used | Used | Sig | Not Used | Used | |
No image | 0.884 | 3.1% | 96.9% | 0.124 | 67.8% | 32.2% | 0.003 | 48.5% | 51.5% |
Image | 3.2% | 96.8% | 65.1% | 34.9% | 43.0% | 57.0% | |||
No video | 0.803 | 3.1% | 96.9% | 0.146 | 65.1% | 34.9% | 0.001 | 42.8% | 57.2% |
Video | 3.1% | 96.9% | 67.7% | 32.3% | 49.3% | 50.7% | |||
No link | 0.816 | 3.2% | 96.8% | 0.231 | 66.3% | 33.7% | 0.234 | 43.6% | 56.4% |
Link | 3.1% | 96.9% | 64.4% | 35.6% | 45.6% | 54.4% |
Codes | Themes | N | Percentage |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Announcements | 285 | 7% |
2 | Education | 500 | 12% |
3 | Events | 1330 | 32% |
4 | Faculty and Research | 208 | 5% |
5 | Reputation and Social Responsibility | 861 | 21% |
6 | Student | 955 | 23% |
7 | Others | 9 | 0% |
Total | 4148 | 100% |
Comments | Shares | Emotes | Total Reactions | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Themes | N | Perc | N | Perc | N | Perc | N | Perc | |
1 | Announcements | 348 | 4.2% | 433 | 2.5% | 4156 | 2.3% | 4937 | 2.4% |
2 | Education | 1168 | 13.9% | 1761 | 10.2% | 18,340 | 10.4% | 21,269 | 10.5% |
3 | Events | 1688 | 20.2% | 2697 | 15.6% | 31,245 | 17.7% | 35,630 | 17.6% |
4 | Faculty and Research | 295 | 3.5% | 632 | 3.7% | 6250 | 3.5% | 7177 | 3.5% |
5 | Reputation and SR | 1206 | 14.4% | 2701 | 15.6% | 32,442 | 18.3% | 36,349 | 17.9% |
6 | Student | 3223 | 38.5% | 7024 | 40.7% | 61,465 | 34.7% | 71,712 | 35.4% |
7 | Others | 446 | 5.3% | 2020 | 11.7% | 23,124 | 13.1% | 25,591 | 12.6% |
Total | 8374 | 100% | 17,269 | 100% | 177,022 | 100% | 202,665 | 100% |
PUBLIC | |||||||||
Comments | Shares | Emotes | Total Reactions | ||||||
Themes | N | Perc | N | Perc | N | Perc | N | Perc | |
1 | Announcements | 37 | 3% | 38 | 2% | 531 | 3% | 606 | 3% |
2 | Education | 114 | 10% | 147 | 8% | 4783 | 23% | 5044 | 21% |
3 | Events | 370 | 33% | 730 | 41% | 7116 | 34% | 8216 | 34% |
4 | Faculty and Research | 136 | 12% | 105 | 6% | 1400 | 7% | 1641 | 7% |
5 | Reputation and SR | 369 | 33% | 578 | 33% | 4915 | 23% | 5862 | 25% |
6 | Student | 101 | 9% | 172 | 10% | 2276 | 11% | 2549 | 11% |
7 | Others | 0 | 0% | 0 | 0% | 0 | 0% | 0 | 0% |
Total | 1127 | 100% | 1770 | 100% | 21,021 | 100% | 23,918 | 100% | |
PRIVATE | |||||||||
Comments | Shares | Emotes | Total Reactions | ||||||
Themes | N | Perc | N | Perc | N | Perc | N | Perc | |
1 | Announcements | 311 | 4% | 395 | 3% | 3625 | 2% | 4331 | 2% |
2 | Education | 1054 | 15% | 1614 | 10% | 13,557 | 9% | 16,225 | 9% |
3 | Events | 1318 | 18% | 1967 | 13% | 24,129 | 15% | 27,414 | 15% |
4 | Faculty and Research | 159 | 2% | 527 | 3% | 4850 | 3% | 5536 | 3% |
5 | Reputation and SR | 837 | 12% | 2123 | 14% | 27,527 | 18% | 30,487 | 17% |
6 | Student | 3122 | 43% | 6852 | 44% | 59,189 | 38% | 69,163 | 39% |
7 | Others | 446 | 6% | 2020 | 13% | 23,116 | 15% | 25,582 | 14% |
Total | 7247 | 100% | 15,498 | 100% | 155,993 | 100% | 178,738 | 100% |
Text Only | Link | Video | Image | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Themes | N | Rea | N | Rea | N | Rea | N | Rea | |
1 | Announcements | 1 | 2 | 131 | 2367 | 46 | 527 | 234 | 4523 |
2 | Education | 2 | 44 | 272 | 12,477 | 147 | 6445 | 352 | 14,807 |
3 | Events | 9 | 207 | 291 | 8081 | 314 | 9791 | 1008 | 25,768 |
4 | Faculty and Research | 1 | 22 | 89 | 3073 | 34 | 1259 | 173 | 5895 |
5 | Reputation and SR | 5 | 95 | 230 | 8282 | 172 | 6108 | 682 | 30,126 |
6 | Student | 7 | 210 | 289 | 11,576 | 199 | 12,673 | 751 | 58,911 |
7 | Others | 0 | 0 | 3 | 2038 | 1 | 159 | 8 | 25,432 |
Total | 25 | 580 | 1305 | 47,894 | 913 | 36,962 | 3208 | 165,462 |
Arabic Only | English and Arabic | English Only | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Themes | N | Rea | N | Rea | N | Rea | |
1 | Announcements | 85 | 831 | 125 | 1740 | 75 | 2366 |
2 | Education | 75 | 881 | 214 | 12,437 | 211 | 7951 |
3 | Events | 310 | 5033 | 646 | 13,482 | 373 | 17,053 |
4 | Faculty and Research | 9 | 189 | 61 | 2265 | 138 | 4723 |
5 | Reputation and SR | 178 | 2571 | 372 | 7868 | 311 | 25,910 |
6 | Student | 169 | 1618 | 404 | 10,283 | 381 | 59,700 |
7 | Others | 1 | 103 | 3 | 82 | 5 | 25,406 |
Total | 827 | 11,226 | 1825 | 48,157 | 1494 | 143,109 |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2025 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Gharbi, I.; AbuDaabes, A.; Al-Kilani, M.H.; Ismail, W.S. Speaking the Right Digital Language: How Post Format and Communication Impact University Facebook Engagement. Adm. Sci. 2025, 15, 310. https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci15080310
Gharbi I, AbuDaabes A, Al-Kilani MH, Ismail WS. Speaking the Right Digital Language: How Post Format and Communication Impact University Facebook Engagement. Administrative Sciences. 2025; 15(8):310. https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci15080310
Chicago/Turabian StyleGharbi, Imen, Ajayeb AbuDaabes, Mohammad Hani Al-Kilani, and Walaa Saber Ismail. 2025. "Speaking the Right Digital Language: How Post Format and Communication Impact University Facebook Engagement" Administrative Sciences 15, no. 8: 310. https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci15080310
APA StyleGharbi, I., AbuDaabes, A., Al-Kilani, M. H., & Ismail, W. S. (2025). Speaking the Right Digital Language: How Post Format and Communication Impact University Facebook Engagement. Administrative Sciences, 15(8), 310. https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci15080310