Training and Job Satisfaction in Portugal’s Public Sector: A Sequential Mediation Model Based on Competency Acquisition, Performance Appraisal, and Career Progression
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Literature Review
2.1. Public Administration: Structural Challenges and Contemporary Transformations
2.2. Training and Job Satisfaction: Theoretical Foundations and Empirical Evidence
2.3. Sequential Mediation Model
2.4. The Role of Performance Appraisal in the Sequential Mediation Model
3. Method
3.1. Design, Sample, and Procedures
3.2. Participants
3.3. Measures
3.4. Data Analysis Procedures
4. Results
4.1. Descriptive Statistics, Reliability, and Validity
4.2. Hypothesis Testing and Sequential Mediation Analysis
5. Discussion
5.1. Theoretical and Practical Contributions
5.2. Limitations and Suggestions for Future Studies
6. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Acar, S., Ogurlu, U., & Zorychta, A. (2023). Exploration of discriminant validity in divergent thinking tasks: A meta-analysis. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 17(6), 705–724. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Adams, J. (1965). Inequity in social exchange. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 2, 267–299. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Alexandrov, A. (2010). Characteristics of single-item measures in Likert scale format. Electronic Journal of Business Research Methods, 8(1), 1–12. [Google Scholar]
- Assembleia da república. (2007). Lei n.º 66-B/2007, de 28 de dezembro (pp. 2–21). Diário da República n.º 250/2007. Diário da República. [Google Scholar]
- Atobishi, T., Bakir, S., & Nosratabadi, S. (2024). How do digital capabilities affect organizational performance in the public sector? The mediating role of the organizational agility. Administrative Sciences, 14(2), 37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Autoridade Nacional de Segurança Rodoviária (ANSR). (2024). Plano de formação 2024. ANSR. [Google Scholar]
- Barbieri, M., Micacchi, L., Vidè, F., & Valotti, G. (2023). The performance of performance appraisal systems: A theoretical framework for public organizations. Review of Public Personnel Administration, 43(1), 104–129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Becker, G. (1964). Human capital: A theoretical and empirical analysis, with special reference to education. University of Chicago Press. [Google Scholar]
- Cheung, G., Cooper-Thomas, H., Lau, R., & Wang, L. (2024). Reporting reliability, convergent and discriminant validity with structural equation modeling: A review and best-practice recommendations. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 41(2), 745–783. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Choiriyah, S., & Riyanto, S. (2021). Effect of training and competence on job satisfaction and its impact on employee commitment (Case study at BPJS Ketenagakerjaan). International Journal of Innovative Science and Research Technology, 6(6), 1021–1030. [Google Scholar]
- Cik, A., Asdar, M., Anwar, A., & Efendi, S. (2021). Impact of training and learning organization on employee competence and its implication on job satisfaction and employee performance of bank in Indonesia. Psychology and Education, 58(1), 140–156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Deci, E., & Ryan, R. (1985). Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior. Springer Science & Business Media. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Demircioglu, M. (2020). Sources of innovation, autonomy, and employee job satisfaction in public organizations. Public Performance & Management Review, 44(1), 155–186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Direção-Geral da Administração e do Emprego Público (DGAEP). (2025). Organização da administração do estado: Estrutura da AP. Available online: https://www.dgaep.gov.pt/index.cfm?OBJID=a5de6f93-bfb3-4bfc-87a2-4a7292719839&men=i (accessed on 14 February 2025).
- Dobrinić, D., & Fabac, R. (2021). Familiarity with mission and vision: Impact on organizational commitment and job satisfaction. Business Systems Research: International Journal of the Society for Advancing Innovation and Research in Economy, 12(1), 124–143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Elsafty, A., & Oraby, M. (2022). The impact of training on employee retention: An empirical research on the private sector in Egypt. International Journal of Business and Management, 17(5), 58–74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fuchs, C., & Diamantopoulos, A. (2009). Using single-item measures for construct measurement in management research: Conceptual issues and application guidelines. Die Betriebswirtschaft, 69(2), 195–210. [Google Scholar]
- Gomathy, D., Avinash, M., Anirudh, M., & Manikanta, M. (2022). The talent management and employee job satisfaction. International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management, 6(3), 1–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hackman, J., & Oldham, G. (1976). Motivation through the design of work: Test of a theory. Organizational Behavior & Human Performance, 16(2), 250–279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hanaysha, J., & Tahir, P. (2016). Examining the effects of employee empowerment, teamwork, and employee training on job satisfaction. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 219(3), 272–282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hayes, A. (2018). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach. The Guilford Press. [Google Scholar]
- Hossain, M., Jahan, N., Ahammed, B., Shohel, T., Khan, B., & Islam, M. (2022). A psychometric evaluation of fear of COVID-19 scale (FCV-19S). Hellenic Journal of Psychology, 19(1), 40–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hu, L., & Bentler, P. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6(1), 1–55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Keeping, L., & Levy, P. (2000). Performance appraisal reactions: Measurement, modeling, and method bias. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85(5), 708–723. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Keltu, T. (2024). The effect of human resource development practice on employee performance with the mediating role of job satisfaction among Mizan Tepi University’s academic staff in Southwestern Ethiopia. Heliyon, 10(8), e29821. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kim, T., Sezer, O., Schroeder, J., Risen, J., Gino, F., & Norton, M. I. (2021). Work group rituals enhance the meaning of work. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 165, 197–212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kiyak, B., & Karkin, N. (2023). Job characteristics and public service motivation among highly-qualified public employees. Asia Pacific Journal of Public Administration, 45(3), 316–333. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kock, F., Berbekova, A., & Assaf, A. (2021). Understanding and managing the threat of common method bias: Detection, prevention and control. Tourism Management, 86, 104330. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kolk, B., & Kaufmann, W. (2019). Performance measurement, cognitive dissonance and coping strategies: Exploring individual responses to NPM-inspired output control. Journal of Management Control, 29(2), 93–113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kumi, E., Osei, H., Asumah, S., & Yeboah, A. (2024). The impact of technology readiness and adapting behaviours in the workplace: A mediating effect of career adaptability. Future Business Journal, 10(1), 63–83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lekić, N., Vapa-Tankosić, J., Rajaković-Mijailović, J., & Lekić, S. (2019). An analysis of factors influencing employee job satisfaction in a public sector. E+M: Ekonomie a Management, 22(3), 83–99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Madureira, C. (2020). The Public Administration reform and the welfare state evolution in Portugal: A recent history. Ler História, 76, 179–202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Madureira, C., Rando, B., & Ferraz, D. (2021). The public administration performance appraisal integrated system (SIADAP) and the Portuguese civil servants perceptions. International Journal of Public Administration, 44(4), 300–310. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mampuru, M., Mokoena, B., & Isabirye, A. (2024). Training and development impact on job satisfaction, loyalty and retention among academics. SA Journal of Human Resource Management, 22, 2420–2431. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mardia, K. (1980). 9 Tests of unvariate and multivariate normality. Handbook of statistics, 1, 279–320. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mardia, K., Kent, J., & Taylor, C. (2024). Multivariate analysis. John Wiley & Sons. [Google Scholar]
- Martins, R., Lira, M., & Viseu, C. (2024). Aging and human resources management in the Portuguese public administration: The case of higher education. Coimbra Business Review, 2, 36–53. [Google Scholar]
- Marzec, I., & Austen, A. (2021). The role of training in improving employability, job satisfaction and the career success of public sector employees. Argumenta Oeconomica, 2(47), 187–204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Memon, M., Salleh, R., Mirza, M., Cheah, J., Ting, H., Ahmad, M., & Tariq, A. (2020). Satisfaction matters: The relationships between HRM practices, work engagement and turnover intention. International Journal of Manpower, 42(1), 21–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Moras, M., & Kashyap, B. (2021). Influence of job characteristics on employees’ job satisfaction: An empirical study. Turkish Journal of Computer and Mathematics Education, 12(11), 6499–6506. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Muzakky, A., & Wulansari, P. (2024). The effect of training and competency on career development: A conceptual framework. Journal of Business and Management Studies, 6(4), 163–167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Omar, E., Demong, N., Hassan, L., Hassan, N., & Alwi, A. (2022). The mediating roles of critical psychological factors towards the relationship between job characteristics and job outcomes: A conceptual framework. Voice of Academia, 18(1), 158–168. [Google Scholar]
- Perry, J., & Wise, L. (1990). The motivational bases of public service. Public Administration Review, 50, 367–373. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Presidência do Conselho de Ministros. (2024). Decreto-Lei n.º 12/2024, de 10 de janeiro (pp. 52–74). Diário da República, 1.ª série. Diário da República. [Google Scholar]
- Raisal, I., Nawaz, N., Appasamy, K., & Gajenderan, V. (2021). Effect of work motivation on employee job satisfaction in the context of public sector organization. Journal of Hunan University Natural Sciences, 48(11), 1–10. [Google Scholar]
- Rezmer, K. (2023). Job satisfaction of the public administration employees based on example local government uni. Kwartalnik Nauk o Przedsiębiorstwie, 70(4), 55–71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rice, B., Martin, N., Fieger, P., & Hussain, T. (2022). Older healthcare workers’ satisfaction: Managing the interaction of age, job security expectations and autonomy. Employee Relations: The International Journal, 44(2), 319–334. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rice, C., Searle, R., & Nienaber, A. (2025). Trust and public sector work: How public service motivation helps explain multi-level trust relations. In Handbook on trust in public governance (pp. 425–439). Edward Elgar Publishing. [Google Scholar]
- Riyanto, S., Handiman, U., Gultom, M., Gunawan, A., Putra, J., & Budiyanto, H. (2023). Increasing job satisfaction, organizational commitment and the requirement for competence and training. Emerging Science Journal, 7(2), 520–537. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rodrigues, R., Gomes, C., & Junça-Silva, A. (2023). The role of satisfaction with the performance appraisal: A comparative study between the public and private sectors. Brazilian Business Management Magazine, 25(1), 72–87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sabri, P., Ilyas, M., & Amjad, Z. (2011). Organizational culture and its impacts on the job satisfaction of the University teachers of Lahore. International Journal of Business and Social Science, 2(4), 121–128. [Google Scholar]
- Schmidt, S. (2004). The job training and job satisfaction survey technical manual; Advance online publication. Available online: https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED494451.pdf (accessed on 14 May 2025).
- Secchi, L., Caeiro, J., Ramos Pinto, R., & Arenilla Sáez, M. (2024). Administrative reforms in Portugal and Spain: From bureaucracy to digital transition. International Review of Administrative Sciences. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shelden, D., & Sowa, J. (2011). Understanding performance appraisal: Social, organizational, and goal-based perspectives. Sage Publications. [Google Scholar]
- Siruri, M., & Cheche, S. (2021). Revisiting the Hackman and Oldham job characteristics model and Herzberg’s two factor theory: Propositions on how to make job enrichment effective in today’s organizations. European Journal of Business and Management Research, 6(2), 162–167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Spector, P. (2022). Job satisfaction: From assessment to intervention. Routledge. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Stazyk, E., Davis, R., & Liang, J. (2021). Probing the links between workforce diversity, goal clarity, and employee job satisfaction in public sector organizations. Administrative Sciences, 11(3), 77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Steil, A., Bello, J., Cuffa, D., & Freitas, A. (2022). Job satisfaction and employee retention by public and private it organizations. Revista de Administração da UFSM, 15(2), 354–369. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Thant, Z., & Chang, Y. (2021). Determinants of public employee job satisfaction in Myanmar: Focus on Herzberg’s two factor theory. Public Organization Review, 21(1), 157–175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Van Laar, S., & Braeken, J. (2021). Understanding the comparative fit index: It’s all about the base! Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 26(26), 26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ventura-León, J., Peña-Calero, B., & Burga-León, A. (2023). The effect of normality and outliers on bivariate correlation coefficients in psychology: A Monte Carlo simulation. The Journal of General Psychology, 150(4), 405–422. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, Q., Gan, K., Wei, H., Sun, A., Wang, Y., & Zhou, X. (2024). Public service motivation and public employees’ turnover intention: The role of job satisfaction and career growth opportunity. Personnel Review, 53(1), 99–118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, X., & Cheng, Z. (2020). Cross-sectional studies: Strengths, weaknesses, and recommendations. Chest, 158(1), S65–S71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Weng, Q., & Hu, B. (2009). The structure of career growth and its impact on employees’ turnover intention. Industrial Engineering and Management, 14(1), 14–21. [Google Scholar]
- Widaman, K., & Helm, J. (2023). Exploratory factor analysis and confirmatory factor analysis. In H. Cooper, M. Coutanche, L. McMullen, A. Panter, D. Rindskopf, & K. Sher (Eds.), APA handbook of research methods in psychology: Data analysis and research publication (2nd ed., pp. 379–410). American Psychological Association. [Google Scholar]
- Wisse, B., van Eijbergen, R., Rietzschel, E., & Shiebe, S. (2018). Catering to the needs of an aging workforce: The role of employee age in the relationship between corporate social responsibility and employee satisfaction. Journal of Business Ethics, 147(4), 875–888. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wuttaphan, N. (2017). Human capital theory: The theory of human resource development, implications, and future. Life Sciences and Environment Journal, 18(2), 240–253. [Google Scholar]
Variables | N = 340 |
---|---|
Gender (as indicated on ID) | |
Male | 142 (41.8%) |
Female | 198 (58.2%) |
Age group (M = 49.43; SD = 8.91) | |
≤44 years | 94 (27.6%) |
45–54 years | 134 (39.4%) |
≥55 years | 112 (32.9%) |
Educational level | |
Below undergraduate degree | 52 (15.3%) |
Undergraduate degree | 183 (53.8%) |
Postgraduate degree | 105 (30.9%) |
SIADAP subsystem | |
SIADAP 2 (middle managers) | 139 (40.9%) |
SIADAP 3 (other employees) | 143 (42.1%) |
Other system | 58 (17.1%) |
Length of service (M = 21.67; SD = 9.24) | |
≤15 years | 80 (23.5%) |
16–25 years | 133 (39.1%) |
≥26 years | 127 (37.4%) |
Variable | M | SD | CR | AVE | MSV | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1. JS | 3.23 1 | 0.90 | 0.86 | 0.77 | 0.32 | (0.80) | |||
2. Training | 3.29 1 | 0.88 | 0.91 | 0.81 | 0.40 | 0.446 ** | (0.86) | ||
3. CA | 3.15 1 | 0.94 | 0.98 | 0.83 | 0.40 | 0.392 ** | 0.630 ** | (0.95) | |
4. CP | 1.96 1 | 0.81 | 0.89 | 0.82 | 0.32 | 0.555 ** | 0.324 ** | 0.393 ** | (0.83) |
5. PA 2 | - | - | - | - | - | 0.187 ** | 0.059 | 0.108 * | 0.201 ** |
Age | 49.43 | 8.91 | - | - | - | 0.110 | −0.089 | 0.036 | 0.093 |
LoS | 21.67 | 9.24 | - | - | - | 0.105 | −0.087 | 0.037 | 0.096 |
Effects | Bootstrapping CI | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Total indirect Effect | B | SE | Lower | Upper |
Model 1: Training → Competency acquisition → Job satisfaction | 0.000 | 0.043 | −0.082 | 0.089 |
Model 2: Training → PA → Job satisfaction | 0.004 | 0.008 | −0.010 | 0.023 |
Model 3: Training → Career progression → Job satisfaction | 0.066 | 0.033 | 0.001 | 0.128 |
Model 4: Training → Competency acquisition → PA → Job satisfaction | 0.008 | 0.006 | −0.001 | 0.024 |
Model 5: Training → Competency acquisition → Career progression → Job satisfaction | 0.093 | 0.023 | 0.050 | 0.141 |
Model 6: Training → PA → Career progression → Job satisfaction | 0.002 | 0.005 | −0.005 | 0.013 |
Model 7: Training → Competency acquisition → PA → Career progression → Job satisfaction | 0.005 | 0.004 | 0.001 | 0.013 |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2025 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Silva, M.; Rodrigues, R.I. Training and Job Satisfaction in Portugal’s Public Sector: A Sequential Mediation Model Based on Competency Acquisition, Performance Appraisal, and Career Progression. Adm. Sci. 2025, 15, 189. https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci15050189
Silva M, Rodrigues RI. Training and Job Satisfaction in Portugal’s Public Sector: A Sequential Mediation Model Based on Competency Acquisition, Performance Appraisal, and Career Progression. Administrative Sciences. 2025; 15(5):189. https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci15050189
Chicago/Turabian StyleSilva, Manuela, and Rosa Isabel Rodrigues. 2025. "Training and Job Satisfaction in Portugal’s Public Sector: A Sequential Mediation Model Based on Competency Acquisition, Performance Appraisal, and Career Progression" Administrative Sciences 15, no. 5: 189. https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci15050189
APA StyleSilva, M., & Rodrigues, R. I. (2025). Training and Job Satisfaction in Portugal’s Public Sector: A Sequential Mediation Model Based on Competency Acquisition, Performance Appraisal, and Career Progression. Administrative Sciences, 15(5), 189. https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci15050189