Next Article in Journal
Managing Global Talent: Innovative Solutions and a Sustainable Strategy Using a Human-Centric Approach
Previous Article in Journal
Entrepreneurial Resources, Decision-Making Logic and Organisational Change Readiness: Enhancing SME Sustainability in New Zealand
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Training and Job Satisfaction in Portugal’s Public Sector: A Sequential Mediation Model Based on Competency Acquisition, Performance Appraisal, and Career Progression

by
Manuela Silva
and
Rosa Isabel Rodrigues
*
Business & Economics School, Instituto Superior de Gestão, 1500-552 Lisboa, Portugal
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Adm. Sci. 2025, 15(5), 189; https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci15050189
Submission received: 20 April 2025 / Revised: 14 May 2025 / Accepted: 16 May 2025 / Published: 21 May 2025

Abstract

:
This study examines the relationship between training and job satisfaction among public sector employees in Portugal through a sequential mediation model. Understanding the factors that influence job satisfaction among public administration employees is essential for fostering healthier and more productive work environments. This study investigates the role of competency acquisition, performance appraisal (PA), and career progression opportunities in the relationship between training and job satisfaction, using a sequential mediation model. The sample consisted of 340 public sector employees aged between 20 and 65 years. A cross-sectional, quantitative design was employed to analyze the relationships among the variables and test the proposed hypotheses. Data were collected using a structured questionnaire administered to a convenience sample. The mediation analysis revealed that training influences job satisfaction indirectly by promoting the development of competencies that contribute to improved PA results, which, in turn, facilitate career advancement. These findings highlight the importance of implementing organizational strategies that align training with transparent performance evaluation systems and career development plans, offering valuable guidance for public human resource policies aimed at strengthening institutional efficiency.

1. Introduction

Job satisfaction among public administration employees has been widely discussed as a key factor influencing the efficiency and quality of services delivered to society (Lekić et al., 2019). In Portugal, this topic acquires particular relevance due to the structural and bureaucratic characteristics of its public administration, combined with increasing societal expectations regarding service quality. The recognition of professionals, adequate working conditions, and the availability of development opportunities are fundamental aspects that directly affect organizational performance and talent retention in the public sector (Steil et al., 2022). In this context, several studies (e.g., Demircioglu, 2020; Gomathy et al., 2022; Rezmer, 2023) highlight that job satisfaction is central to human resource management and has a direct impact on employee productivity and well-being, thus requiring an integrated and multidimensional understanding. In the specific case of public administration, identifying the drivers of job satisfaction becomes even more relevant due to the complexity of labor relations, bureaucratic constraints, and growing societal expectations regarding service delivery (Thant & Chang, 2021).
The objective of this study is to examine how training impacts job satisfaction among public sector employees in Portugal, considering the sequential mediating roles of competency acquisition, performance appraisal (PA), and career progression. Specifically, we aim to address the following research question: To what extent does training influence job satisfaction in the public sector through competency acquisition, PA, and career progression? By clarifying this relationship, this study seeks to contribute to a better understanding of how HRM practices can enhance employee satisfaction and organizational efficiency in a public sector context.
In Portugal, the PA of public administration employees is governed by the Integrated Performance Management and Appraisal System (SIADAP), established by Law no. 66-B/2007 of 28 December. This system is structured into three subsystems: SIADAP 1, which evaluates public services; SIADAP 2, which assesses middle managers; and SIADAP 3, which is focused on the appraisal of all other employees. A central feature of SIADAP is its quota mechanism, which limits the proportion of employees who can receive the highest performance ratings, regardless of actual individual performance. This approach aims to ensure differentiation based on merit but is often perceived as a source of demotivation, due to its restrictive nature. The system has undergone several updates, the most recent being Decree-Law no. 12/2024 of 10 January (Presidência do Conselho de Ministros, 2024), which introduced changes effective from 1 January 2025, notably reducing the number of performance points required for career progression.
According to Rodrigues et al. (2023), in the private sector, financial incentives and market competitiveness are major determinants of employee satisfaction. However, in the public sector, stability, professional recognition, and the meaningfulness of work appear to be more significant (Barbieri et al., 2023). In addition to these structural differences between sectors, it is also essential to consider how internal organizational factors affect the experience of public employees (Madureira et al., 2021). Investing in competency development not only increases satisfaction levels but also enhances the quality of public services (Marzec & Austen, 2021). Along these lines, Choiriyah and Riyanto (2021) argue that continuous training is essential for competency acquisition and for reinforcing employees’ sense of value within their organization, ultimately maximizing job satisfaction.
In the public sector, job satisfaction is also closely related to how employees perceive the PA process and its impact on career progression (Memon et al., 2020). Due to the quota system embedded in SIADAP, many employees report demotivation, as salary progression and recognition are limited, regardless of their efforts or performance (Madureira et al., 2021). This perception of injustice often results in reduced organizational commitment and lower individual performance. Therefore, implementing a more transparent appraisal system, grounded in real merit, could contribute to increased job satisfaction and, consequently, to improved public service efficiency.
Despite the relevance of this topic, there are still gaps in understanding how various factors interact to influence job satisfaction in public administration. The current study addresses this gap by proposing a sequential mediation model that investigates the role of competency acquisition, PA, and career progression opportunities in the relationship between training and job satisfaction.
The relevance of this study lies in the urgent need to enhance people management in the public sector by promoting strategies that foster employee motivation, engagement, and performance. Understanding the factors that influence job satisfaction is crucial for talent retention, improving the quality of public services, and strengthening institutional efficiency.

2. Literature Review

2.1. Public Administration: Structural Challenges and Contemporary Transformations

Portuguese public administration is characterized by a complex structure composed of agencies and entities operating under different levels of autonomy and subordination. This configuration, rooted in traditional bureaucratic logics, has undergone a series of reforms aimed at administrative modernization and improved institutional performance (Direção-Geral da Administração e do Emprego Público [DGAEP], 2025).
Over the past few decades, many of these reform efforts have been inspired by the principles of new public management (NPM), a paradigm that seeks to transfer private-sector practices into the public sector, emphasizing efficiency, results orientation, and individual accountability (Kolk & Kaufmann, 2019; Madureira, 2020). The introduction of PA systems such as SIADAP, the promotion of merit-based career progression, and a focus on continuous training are concrete examples of this managerial orientation (Madureira et al., 2021).
However, the implementation of NPM in the Portuguese public sector has also faced criticism. Although this paradigm encourages a more results-driven management approach, it creates tensions with traditional public service principles such as employment stability and equal opportunities (Barbieri et al., 2023). The rigidity of progression systems, often based on quotas and formal criteria, does not always allow for the effective recognition of merit, which undermines perceptions of fairness and weakens intrinsic motivation (Rodrigues et al., 2023).
Training and professional development have, therefore, emerged as key pillars for strengthening public management (Kolk & Kaufmann, 2019). Law no. 66-B/2007 of 28 December, updated by Decree-Law no. 12/2024 of 10 January (Presidência do Conselho de Ministros, 2024), defines as a primary objective the identification of training and development needs that contribute to the improvement of services, managers, and staff performance, while simultaneously fostering motivation, upskilling, and lifelong learning. Despite the progress made, public administration currently faces major challenges, notably an aging workforce and the need to adapt to the digital transformation process (Martins et al., 2024). The digitalization of public services, the use of online platforms, and the reconfiguration of management models have proven to be essential for building a more modern, efficient, and citizen-centered administration (Secchi et al., 2024).
In this context, training and professional development play a strategic role. Beyond enhancing human capital, they may serve as compensatory mechanisms of recognition in a system where career progression is often constrained by structural limitations (Autoridade Nacional de Segurança Rodoviária [ANSR], 2024). However, for training to effectively contribute to motivation and increase organizational commitment, it must be accompanied by coherent and transparent systems of recognition that are aligned with the principles of NPM but adapted to the specificities of the public sector.

2.2. Training and Job Satisfaction: Theoretical Foundations and Empirical Evidence

Job satisfaction is broadly defined as an affective–emotional response to one’s professional activity or to specific aspects of the job itself (Cik et al., 2021). According to Spector (2022), job satisfaction emerges from a cognitive process in which employees compare the actual conditions of their work with a subjective benchmark of expectations and values.
As a multifactorial construct, job satisfaction results from an individual’s perception of the extent to which their expectations align with the objective characteristics of their work (Spector, 2022). Several theoretical models have sought to explain the underlying mechanisms of this perception. The job characteristics theory (Hackman & Oldham, 1976) argues that elements such as task significance, autonomy, and performance feedback are critical determinants of motivation and job satisfaction. These dimensions are particularly relevant in contexts such as public administration, where bureaucratic structures and standardized procedures may constrain autonomy and recognition.
In parallel, the self-determination theory (Deci & Ryan, 1985) emphasizes the importance of fulfilling three basic psychological needs—autonomy, competence, and relatedness—as core sources of satisfaction. Within this framework, continuous training may serve as a catalyst for motivation by enhancing perceived competence development, strengthening the sense of being valued, and fostering a deeper connection between employees and the organization (Rezmer, 2023; Elsafty & Oraby, 2022).
In the public sector, these dynamics acquire specific contours. The literature on public service motivation (PSM) (Perry & Wise, 1990; Q. Wang et al., 2024) suggests that public administration employees are strongly driven by prosocial values, such as commitment to the common good, social justice, and service to the community. In this context, job satisfaction depends not only on extrinsic rewards but, above all, on the perception that their work is meaningful, valued, and aligned with personal values (Kim et al., 2021).
In line with this view, Lekić et al. (2019) propose that continuous training is intrinsically related to job satisfaction, as it fosters skill development and promotes personal fulfilment. Supporting this perspective, Madureira et al. (2021) found that organizational factors are decisive in shaping employee satisfaction. These factors contribute to a work environment where employees feel valued, motivated, and committed to the organization’s mission (Raisal et al., 2021).
Among the elements that influence employees’ psychological states and their responses to job characteristics, three key dimensions stand out: (i) the perceived meaningfulness of their work (Kim et al., 2021); (ii) their sense of responsibility in task execution (Moras & Kashyap, 2021); and (iii) their awareness of PA (Siruri & Cheche, 2021). For employees to experience high levels of job satisfaction, they must view their work as relevant and aligned with their personal values (Omar et al., 2022). Additionally, they must feel responsible for their results and recognize the existence of a transparent and merit-based reward system (Kiyak & Karkin, 2023). The implementation of effective incentive plans, combined with continuous training opportunities, can enhance performance and contribute to higher levels of job satisfaction (Riyanto et al., 2023).
In the context of public administration, Raisal et al. (2021) identified key motivational factors, including a positive work environment and fulfillment derived from task completion. Furthermore, the opportunity to participate in training programs aimed at professional skill development is highlighted (Marzec & Austen, 2021). In this regard, Elsafty and Oraby (2022) argue that training programs should be designed based on both individual employee needs and the organization’s strategic objectives. Learning should, therefore, be conceived as a shared responsibility, one in which employees demonstrate their willingness to acquire new knowledge while organizations commit to creating favorable conditions for professional development (Rezmer, 2023).
Based on these premises, the first research hypothesis was defined:
Hypothesis 1.
Training positively influences job satisfaction among public administration employees.

2.3. Sequential Mediation Model

The relationship between training and job satisfaction has been widely examined in the literature, yet it is often treated as a direct and static link. However, there is growing evidence that this impact unfolds through intermediate organizational processes that shape employees’ perceptions of recognition and translate training investment into tangible outcomes (Muzakky & Wulansari, 2024).
According to the human capital theory (Becker, 1964; Wuttaphan, 2017), training promotes the acquisition of knowledge and skills that enhance an individual’s value to the organization. In the context of public administration, such personal development may improve job performance, equip employees for new roles, and increase their adaptability to complex and evolving environments (Atobishi et al., 2024).
Thus, competency acquisition represents the first link in the chain connecting training to job satisfaction by creating the conditions for more effective performance aligned with organizational goals (Kumi et al., 2024). Integrating competency-based training models helps align organizational needs with individual expectations, contributing to more coherent and motivational career paths (Mampuru et al., 2024).
Building on this reasoning, Muzakky and Wulansari (2024) suggest that training and competency acquisition have a positive influence on job satisfaction, and that this relationship is mediated by career progression. Mampuru et al. (2024) further emphasize that training focused on competency development is essential for career advancement and for reinforcing a sense of professional recognition. In this sense, training and skills development not only improve employee performance and adaptability within the public sector but also serve as key drivers of professional growth (Keltu, 2024). Career progression, in turn, operates as a mediating factor, consolidating the impact of training on job satisfaction.
Based on this conceptual framework, the second research hypothesis was defined:
Hypothesis 2.
Competency acquisition and career progression function as sequential mediators in the relationship between training and job satisfaction.

2.4. The Role of Performance Appraisal in the Sequential Mediation Model

PA emerges as a key element in the proposed model, playing a crucial role in how employees perceive organizational recognition. According to Equity Theory (Adams, 1965), employees compare their efforts and outcomes with those of others. When they perceive that their performance is fairly and transparently recognized through PA, they tend to feel motivated and satisfied. Conversely, the absence of adequate recognition may generate feelings of frustration, devaluation, and demotivation (Madureira et al., 2021).
Several studies (e.g., Keeping & Levy, 2000; Madureira et al., 2021; Shelden & Sowa, 2011) have highlighted the importance of continuous training and skill development for job satisfaction. However, these factors are most effective when combined with a PA system that is perceived as fair and with real opportunities for career advancement (Marzec & Austen, 2021). The alignment of training investment, performance recognition, and career progression is, therefore, considered essential to promoting job satisfaction within organizational contexts (Kiyak & Karkin, 2023). For the PA process to be effective, all stakeholders must understand its goals, methodologies, and consequences, and must recognize its legitimacy and instrumental value (Rodrigues et al., 2023).
Madureira et al. (2021) observed that most public administration employees acknowledge the importance of PA. However, the current model in place—SIADAP—is often perceived as inadequate, particularly due to its lack of objectivity and transparency. In response, public sector organizations must invest in structured training pathways, implement fair and reliable PA systems, and offer clear and accessible career trajectories (Marzec & Austen, 2021). These practices not only enhance job satisfaction but also contribute to improved organizational performance and overall employee well-being (Steil et al., 2022). Together, these factors help foster a more equitable, motivating, and productive organizational environment, reinforcing the notion that employee satisfaction is fundamental to the effectiveness and quality of public service delivery (Barbieri et al., 2023).
It is important to emphasize that the recognition of competencies—reflected in positive PA and in tangible career progression opportunities—acts as a powerful driver of intrinsic motivation (Atobishi et al., 2024). When employees perceive that their training efforts are valued and rewarded, they tend to show higher levels of organizational commitment and a more proactive attitude toward their responsibilities (Mampuru et al., 2024). This perception of fairness and merit contributes to the development of a growth-oriented organizational culture, where job satisfaction emerges as the natural outcome of a virtuous cycle of investment, recognition, and ongoing development (Muzakky & Wulansari, 2024).
Based on the literature reviewed, the third research hypothesis was formulated:
Hypothesis 3.
Competency acquisition, PA, and career progression sequentially mediate the relationship between training and job satisfaction.
Figure 1 illustrates the relationships among the variables discussed throughout the literature review.
The model examines the direct effect of training on job satisfaction (H1), as well as indirect effects through organizational mediators. It specifically reflects the mediation pathway involving competency acquisition and career progression (H2), along with the more comprehensive sequential mediation pathway that includes competency acquisition, PA, and career progression (H3).

3. Method

3.1. Design, Sample, and Procedures

This study adopted a cross-sectional, quantitative design aimed at analyzing the relationships among the variables and testing the proposed hypotheses. Data were collected using a structured online questionnaire, which was disseminated to employees working in various public administration services in Portugal.
A non-probabilistic convenience sampling strategy was used, based on accessibility and voluntary participation. Although the sample was not random, efforts were made to include employees from diverse organizational units, different hierarchical levels, and with varying lengths of service. This approach was intended to capture different professional profiles within the Portuguese public sector, ensuring heterogeneity in the responses.
The cross-sectional design was considered appropriate in this context, as it allows for the examination of relationships between constructs at a given point in time. Furthermore, this type of design is suitable when theoretical and empirical evidence suggests that mediation effects may occur either immediately or within a short time frame (X. Wang & Cheng, 2020).

3.2. Participants

A total of 340 public administration employees participated in the study, of whom 58.2% were female. Participants’ ages ranged from 21 to 65 years (M = 49.43; SD = 8.91). The sample included professionals from various functional levels and with different lengths of service, as shown in Table 1.
Regarding the performance appraisal system, participants were classified according to the applicable SIADAP subsystem: (a) SIADAP 2 assesses middle managers, focusing on leadership and operational results, while (b) SIADAP 3 evaluates other employees, focusing on individual performance and competencies.
This classification reflects the organizational structure of the Portuguese public sector and ensures the relevance of the data collected to the proposed mediation model.

3.3. Measures

Employee Training Questionnaire. To assess employees’ perceptions of the training activities they had attended, five items developed by Hanaysha and Tahir (2016) were used, based on the work of Schmidt (2004) (e.g., Overall, the training I receive on the job meets my needs). The scale demonstrated satisfactory internal consistency, both in the present study and in the aforementioned research, with Cronbach’s alpha coefficients of 0.86.
Competency acquisition. The competencies that were assessed were derived from the training plan of the Portuguese National Road Safety Authority (Autoridade Nacional de Segurança Rodoviária (ANSR), 2024) and were defined in alignment with the PA objectives set out by SIADAP (Portugal, Assembleia da República, 2007). For example, one of the items evaluated was: “The most recent training activity I attended helped me improve my public service orientation skills.” The questionnaire, which included the 18 competencies outlined in the training plan, demonstrated high internal consistency (α = 0.95).
Performance appraisal. This variable was assessed using a single-item scale, reflecting the employee’s perception of the result of their most recent formal performance appraisal, as attributed by their direct manager or supervisor within the SIADAP system. The response options followed the official terminology used in Portuguese public administration, ranging from Inadequate Performance to Excellent Performance (Portugal, Presidência do Conselho de Ministros, 2024; Madureira et al., 2021). This measure does not refer to self-appraisal, but rather to the outcome of the official evaluation process.
Although single-item scales are often criticized for their limited psychometric properties, they are recommended in organizational contexts, where quick and easily interpretable responses are required (Alexandrov, 2010; Rodrigues et al., 2023). In this sense, Fuchs and Diamantopoulos (2009) highlight that single-item measures can offer advantages in terms of efficiency and simplicity compared to multi-item alternatives.
Career Growth Scale. This variable was assessed using four items developed by Weng and Hu (2009) (e.g., “The probability of being promoted in my present organization is high”). Both in the original validation studies and in the present research, Cronbach’s alpha coefficients indicated satisfactory internal consistency, with values ranging between 0.83 and 0.86.
Job Satisfaction Questionnaire. This variable was measured using four items developed by Sabri et al. (2011) (e.g., “Overall, I am satisfied with my current job”). The final score was calculated by averaging the sum of all item responses, with higher values indicating greater levels of job satisfaction. As in the original validation study, Cronbach’s alpha coefficients demonstrated high internal consistency, ranging from 0.80 to 0.84.
With the exception of the PA outcome, all other variables were assessed using a five-point Likert scale, ranging from 1 (strongly disagree) to 5 (strongly agree), depending on the degree of agreement with each statement.
Control variables. To reduce potential bias in the results, age and organizational tenure were both included as control variables. Several studies (e.g., Dobrinić & Fabac, 2021; B. Rice et al., 2022; Wisse et al., 2018) have identified these two factors as strong predictors of job satisfaction in workplace contexts. According to Stazyk et al. (2021), older employees tend to report higher levels of job satisfaction compared to younger colleagues, often due to better working conditions and higher salaries. Similarly, Steil et al. (2022) argue that longer tenure is generally associated with greater financial stability and access to benefits, which positively contribute to satisfaction levels.

3.4. Data Analysis Procedures

Statistical analyses were conducted using SPSS (version 29) and AMOS (version 29) software. The relationships between variables were examined through multiple linear regression analysis and a sequential mediation model, tested using the PROCESS macro (Hayes, 2018).
To assess multivariate normality, Mardia’s coefficient was calculated (Mardia, 1980). This analysis provided measures of skewness, kurtosis, and statistical significance (p-values). The results indicated that the data met the assumptions of multivariate normality (Mardia_skewness = 2.90, p = 0.79; Mardia_kurtosis = 8.07, p = 0.38), since Mardia’s standardized coefficient exceeded the 5% threshold (p > 0.05; Hossain et al., 2022; Mardia et al., 2024).
Additionally, skewness and kurtosis values for the variables analyzed were within the range of [−1.5; 1.5], as recommended by Ventura-León et al. (2023). To control for common method bias, Harman’s single-factor test was performed. The unrotated solution explained 47.3% of the total variance—below the 50.0% threshold proposed by Kock et al. (2021)—suggesting that common method bias did not significantly affect the results.

4. Results

4.1. Descriptive Statistics, Reliability, and Validity

Before testing the proposed hypotheses, the descriptive statistics and psychometric properties of the measurement model were examined to ensure the reliability and validity of the constructs used.
Convergent validity was confirmed, as the average variance extracted (AVE) exceeded 0.50 and the composite reliability (CR) was greater than 0.70, in accordance with the criteria established by Cheung et al. (2024). Furthermore, the maximum shared variance (MSV) was lower than the AVE for all variables, confirming the discriminant validity of the measurement model (Acar et al., 2023).
Finally, statistically significant correlations were observed among all main variables (see Table 2), with the exception of age and organizational tenure, which showed no significant relationships with the core constructs. These results indicate that sociodemographic characteristics did not influence the patterns identified in the analysis.
Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) was subsequently conducted to assess whether the observed variables adequately reflected the latent constructs (Widaman & Helm, 2023). The estimated coefficients indicated a good model fit to the sample data [χ2(385) = 2.82, p < 0.001, GFI = 0.88, CFI = 0.92, TLI = 0.91, RMSEA = 0.07, LO90 = 0.06, and HI90 = 0.07], although the CFI value was slightly below the threshold recommended by Hu and Bentler (1999) and Van Laar and Braeken (2021).

4.2. Hypothesis Testing and Sequential Mediation Analysis

To test the hypotheses formulated in this study, multiple linear regression analyses were conducted, along with the estimation of a serial mediation model. Initially, the direct effect of training on job satisfaction was tested and found to be statistically significant and positive (β = 0.446, t = 9.169, p < 0.001; Hypothesis 1). Additionally, the training variable explained only 19.7% of the variance in job satisfaction (R2 = 0.197), indicating that although training plays a relevant role, other workplace factors also influence satisfaction levels.
To analyze the indirect effects of training on job satisfaction through competency acquisition, PA, and career progression, Model 6 of the PROCESS macro for SPSS was applied (Hayes, 2018). The results showed that, when considered in isolation, only career progression (B = 0.066, SE = 0.033, 95% CI [0.001, 0.128]) mediated the relationship between training and job satisfaction. However, when examined jointly, competency acquisition and career progression demonstrated a significant sequential mediation effect. That is, training positively influenced job satisfaction, first through competency acquisition and then through career progression (B = 0.093, SE = 0.023, 95% CI [0.050, 0.141], p < 0.001; Hypothesis 2).
Finally, the analysis tested whether the inclusion of PA results maintained the sequential mediation effect. The findings confirmed the significance of the mediation effect (B = 0.005, SE = 0.004, 95% CI [0.001, 0.013], p < 0.001; Hypothesis 3), indicating that competency acquisition resulting from training positively affects PA, which, in turn, facilitates career progression. This process ultimately enhances job satisfaction.
Subsequently, comparisons were made between the significant indirect effects to examine whether they differed in strength in terms of mediating the relationship between training and job satisfaction (see Table 3). The results showed that the indirect effect of training via career progression alone (B = 0.066) was smaller than the effect when career progression was combined with competency acquisition (B = 0.093), which, in turn, was greater than the full sequential mediation path (B = 0.055).
The mediation analysis showed that training influences job satisfaction indirectly by promoting competency development, which improves PA and, in turn, facilitates career progression. The comparison of indirect effects highlights the importance of a structured professional development pathway in which training leads to competency acquisition, which is then reflected in PA, drives career progression, and ultimately enhances job satisfaction. These findings emphasize the need to implement organizational strategies that promote training opportunities aligned with career development plans and PA systems, in order to ensure a more effective use of employee qualifications in the workplace.

5. Discussion

This study aimed to examine how training influences job satisfaction among public sector employees in Portugal, considering the sequential mediating roles of competency acquisition, PA, and career progression. To address this objective, we tested three hypotheses based on the existing literature, seeking to understand whether these mediators individually or sequentially explain the relationship between training and job satisfaction. The research question guiding this analysis was: To what extent does training influence job satisfaction through competency acquisition, PA, and career progression?
The results demonstrated that training has a positive effect on job satisfaction, thereby confirming Hypothesis 1. Similar findings were reported by Lekić et al. (2019), who emphasized the link between continuous training, competency development, and increased satisfaction. Likewise, Marzec and Austen (2021) noted that training not only facilitates the acquisition of new knowledge and skills but also strengthens perceptions of professional recognition and career progression.
However, the effect of training on job satisfaction was found to be relatively moderate, suggesting that while it is important, training alone is not a sufficient predictor of job satisfaction. These findings align with studies by Kim et al. (2021), Moras and Kashyap (2021), and Siruri and Cheche (2021), which highlight that satisfaction results from the interaction of multiple elements, such as perceived task significance, role responsibility, and outcome recognition. Kiyak and Karkin (2023) add that a positive work environment and transparent reward systems are also essential for fostering satisfaction. Although training plays a meaningful role, these results underscore the need for an integrated human resource management (HRM) approach that includes complementary strategies to enhance employee motivation and satisfaction (Spector, 2022).
The positive effect of training reinforces the importance of developing training programs that are aligned with employee needs and organisational strategic goals (Elsafty & Oraby, 2022). Building on this premise, Rezmer (2023) argues that it is essential to create conditions that foster continuous professional development, ensuring tangible benefits for both employees and the organization.
Hypothesis 2, which proposed that competency acquisition and career progression function as sequential mediators between training and job satisfaction, was partially supported. The analysis showed that only career progression, when considered in isolation, had a significant mediating effect. However, when both variables were examined jointly, a sequential mediation effect was observed: training positively influenced job satisfaction, first through competency acquisition and then through career progression.
These findings are consistent with those of Kumi et al. (2024), who suggested that employee recognition in public administration increasingly depends on the ability to acquire and apply practical, transversal, and digital skills. Acquiring such competencies improves the job fit and increases career advancement opportunities, which, in turn, boost motivation and satisfaction (Atobishi et al., 2024). The empirical evidence of sequential mediation supports the theoretical assumptions of Muzakky and Wulansari (2024), who argue that training directed at relevant skill development has a direct impact on career progression, which is, in turn, a key factor in job satisfaction.
This sequential relationship demonstrates that training investments only generate meaningful improvements in employee well-being when they are linked to well-defined career development plans and organizational environments that reward merit and support professional growth (Keltu, 2024). These results strengthen the case for policies that promote competency-based training and foster clear and motivating professional trajectories (Mampuru et al., 2024). Promoting individual and collective performance contributes to building more effective, resilient, and citizen-oriented public sector organizations (C. Rice et al., 2025).
Hypothesis 3 was also supported. The findings confirmed the existence of a sequential mediation effect between training and job satisfaction via competency acquisition, PA, and career progression. These results are in line with those reported by Muzakky and Wulansari (2024), who stress that the impact of training on satisfaction is neither direct nor immediate but instead occurs through a coordinated process of professional recognition and validation. Mampuru et al. (2024) add that training promotes the development of relevant skills, which are reflected in more favorable PA and, consequently, increased career progression.
This process significantly contributes to enhancing job satisfaction among public sector employees. According to Madureira et al. (2021), perceived fairness and transparency in PA processes are critical for sustaining motivation and organizational commitment. The present study’s data also showed that when employees believe that their skill acquisition is valued and that PA accurately reflects their performance, they feel more motivated and engaged. As argued by Atobishi et al. (2024), the institutional recognition of acquired competencies acts as a stimulus for intrinsic motivation. Career progression, in turn, serves as both an instrumental and symbolic reinforcement of that recognition, contributing to an organizational culture that is grounded in fairness, merit, and employee well-being (Muzakky & Wulansari, 2024).

5.1. Theoretical and Practical Contributions

This study offers a relevant contribution to advancing knowledge in the field of human resource management (HRM) in the public sector by proposing and empirically testing a sequential mediation model that integrates training, competency acquisition, PA, career progression, and job satisfaction. Unlike fragmented approaches that examine these constructs in isolation, the present research provides a systemic understanding of how their effects unfold, offering a more comprehensive perspective on motivational dynamics in public administration.
The main theoretical contribution lies in demonstrating that training only has a significant impact on job satisfaction when it is integrated with organizational recognition mechanisms—namely, the valuing of acquired competencies, fair PA, and the existence of real opportunities for career progression. This integrative perspective enhances our understanding of the psychological and organizational mechanisms that support motivation at work, reinforcing the relevance of human capital theory and recognition-based approaches grounded in symbolic and non-material rewards in the public sector. By proposing a model tailored to the specificities of public administration—particularly its bureaucratic structure, rigid progression systems, and the importance of intrinsic motivational factors—this study helps bridge the theoretical gap regarding job satisfaction in public sector contexts.
From a practical standpoint, this research provides empirical evidence that underscores the need to define more effective HRM policies in public administration. The findings suggest that without recognition and career advancement prospects, investment in training has a limited impact on employee satisfaction. Therefore, it is recommended that public institutions align their training programs with performance evaluation systems based on transparent and merit-based criteria, ensuring that training efforts are reflected in career development.
The proposed model can serve as a foundation for redesigning more integrated HRM practices that are focused on recognizing performance and developing human potential. Implementing clear career plans that are connected to training paths and continuous competency improvement may serve as effective tools for talent retention, especially among younger and more qualified staff. This approach is particularly relevant in the face of an aging workforce and increasing difficulties in attracting skilled professionals to the public sector.
Moreover, this research contributes to consolidating the principles of NPM by demonstrating that the efficiency and quality of public services are inherently linked to employee well-being and recognition. By promoting job satisfaction through fair, coherent, and strategically aligned HRM practices, public administration can become more attractive, modern, and effective in fulfilling its mission.
In addition to the theoretical implications discussed previously, the findings of this study offer practical recommendations for the development of human resource management policies in the public sector. First and foremost, it is essential to align training programs with transparent, merit-based PA systems, ensuring that the competencies thus acquired are effectively recognized and valued. Merely providing training activities, without a clear link to institutional recognition processes, proves insufficient to promote job satisfaction. In this regard, it is recommended that organizations should implement structured professional development plans that coherently integrate continuous training with concrete career advancement opportunities. These plans should be clearly communicated to employees and adapted to the specificities of their roles in order to reinforce perceptions of fairness and organizational justice.
Additionally, it is advisable to review the PA models currently in place, such as SIADAP, promoting greater objectivity and transparency in recognition processes. The use of performance indicators that are more closely aligned with the competencies developed through training may help reduce the demotivation associated with excessively bureaucratic appraisal systems.
Finally, the creation of continuous feedback mechanisms is essential to monitor the impact of training initiatives and to adjust development strategies according to the needs that are identified. This integrated approach not only has the potential to enhance employee motivation and satisfaction but also to improve the efficiency and quality of public services, in line with the principles of NPM.

5.2. Limitations and Suggestions for Future Studies

Despite the methodological rigor and the relevance of its findings, this study presents some limitations that should be considered when interpreting the results. First, the use of a convenience sample may compromise the representativeness of the data and, consequently, limit the generalizability of the findings to the broader population of public administration employees. The relatively small sample size also constitutes a methodological limitation, as it may affect the statistical robustness of the tested models. Moreover, given the complexity of the proposed sequential mediation model, the relatively small sample size may have limited the statistical power to detect subtle indirect effects, particularly in the longer mediation pathways (e.g., Hypothesis 3).
In addition, the cross-sectional nature of the study—based on data collected at a single point in time—prevents the identification of causal relationships and the observation of potential changes in employees’ perceptions over time. While the sequential mediation model helps to uncover the mechanisms underlying the relationships between variables, its complexity requires a high degree of analytical rigor and does not allow for strong causal inference in non-experimental settings.
Another limitation concerns the exclusive use of a quantitative approach, which, although useful for identifying patterns and testing hypotheses, does not allow for an in-depth exploration of employees’ subjective experiences. The absence of qualitative data may restrict the interpretation of certain relationships, particularly those involving individual perceptions of PA, career progression, and the recognition of acquired competencies.
To deepen scientific understanding of this topic, future research should consider adopting longitudinal designs that enable the analysis of variable evolution over time and provide stronger support for causal interpretations. The use of probabilistic and representative samples from the public sector population would also enhance the external validity of the results. Additionally, combining quantitative and qualitative methods—such as semi-structured interviews or focus groups—may provide richer insights into the subjective and contextual dynamics associated with job satisfaction.
Finally, future studies are encouraged to explore the role of leadership in the public sector, particularly how the actions of department heads and senior managers affect employee motivation and satisfaction. It would be especially relevant to examine leadership as a potential mediating or moderating variable in the relationship between training, competency acquisition, PA, career progression, and job satisfaction. This line of research could offer valuable contributions for developing more effective leadership policies and for implementing HRM practices that are well adapted to the specific characteristics of public administration.

6. Conclusions

The main objective of this study was to analyze the factors that contribute to job satisfaction among public administration employees. By applying a sequential mediation model, the study sought to understand how training influences job satisfaction, considering competency acquisition, PA, and career progression as mediating variables.
The results showed that training has a positive impact on job satisfaction, and that this effect is enhanced when the acquired competencies are duly recognized. A sequential mediation effect was confirmed, in which training promotes the development of competencies, which, in turn, positively influence PA and, subsequently, facilitate career progression. This process ultimately leads to higher levels of job satisfaction. These findings are consistent with the existing literature (e.g., Atobishi et al., 2024; Madureira et al., 2021; Mampuru et al., 2024; Muzakky & Wulansari, 2024) and highlight that the valorization of human capital—when supported by fair and effective systems of professional development and recognition—contributes significantly to employee well-being and organizational efficiency.
However, the results also revealed that PA, when considered as an isolated mediating variable, exerts a weaker effect compared to other indirect pathways. This finding suggests that the performance evaluation system currently implemented in public administration—namely, SIADAP—is not fully fulfilling its role in recognizing and rewarding individual merit, which may limit the positive effects of training and competency development on employees’ professional trajectories. The perception of injustice and inefficiency in the appraisal system undermines employee motivation and organizational engagement, thereby threatening the sustainability of a development-oriented culture.
In this context, it becomes essential for public institutions to adopt a strategic and integrated approach to people management, in which training investments are aligned with fair appraisal mechanisms and transparent, actionable career plans. The implementation of policies that recognize merit, encourage lifelong learning, and ensure progression opportunities may serve as a key driver of job satisfaction. This satisfaction, in turn, is not an end in itself but instead a means to ensure the delivery of more effective, humane, and socially responsive public services.
By integrating training, competency acquisition, PA, and career progression in a sequential structure, the proposed model moves beyond fragmented or simplistic approaches that examine these variables in isolation. Its originality lies in the dynamic articulation between individual development factors and organizational recognition mechanisms, offering a more comprehensive understanding of professional advancement in public administration. In addition to enriching academic debate on strategic people management in bureaucratic settings, the model provides a valuable tool to support the design of more coherent, effective, and merit-oriented public policies.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, M.S. and R.I.R.; methodology, R.I.R.; software, R.I.R.; validation, M.S. and R.I.R.; formal analysis, M.S. and R.I.R.; investigation, M.S.; data curation, M.S.; writing—original draft preparation, M.S. and R.I.R.; writing—review and editing, M.S. and R.I.R. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

The study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki. Informed consent was obtained from all participants. Participation was voluntary, and confidentiality and anonymity were assured through-out the research process. The Ethics Statement was assigned by the ISG/CIGEST Ethics Committee (Reference: CIG_0011/2025; Date: 29 April 2025).

Informed Consent Statement

Informed consent was obtained from all subjects involved in the study.

Data Availability Statement

The data underlying this article will be shared on reasonable request to the corresponding author.

Acknowledgments

CIGEST—Management Research Center, Lisbon, Portugal.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Acar, S., Ogurlu, U., & Zorychta, A. (2023). Exploration of discriminant validity in divergent thinking tasks: A meta-analysis. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 17(6), 705–724. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Adams, J. (1965). Inequity in social exchange. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 2, 267–299. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Alexandrov, A. (2010). Characteristics of single-item measures in Likert scale format. Electronic Journal of Business Research Methods, 8(1), 1–12. [Google Scholar]
  4. Assembleia da república. (2007). Lei n.º 66-B/2007, de 28 de dezembro (pp. 2–21). Diário da República n.º 250/2007. Diário da República. [Google Scholar]
  5. Atobishi, T., Bakir, S., & Nosratabadi, S. (2024). How do digital capabilities affect organizational performance in the public sector? The mediating role of the organizational agility. Administrative Sciences, 14(2), 37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Autoridade Nacional de Segurança Rodoviária (ANSR). (2024). Plano de formação 2024. ANSR. [Google Scholar]
  7. Barbieri, M., Micacchi, L., Vidè, F., & Valotti, G. (2023). The performance of performance appraisal systems: A theoretical framework for public organizations. Review of Public Personnel Administration, 43(1), 104–129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Becker, G. (1964). Human capital: A theoretical and empirical analysis, with special reference to education. University of Chicago Press. [Google Scholar]
  9. Cheung, G., Cooper-Thomas, H., Lau, R., & Wang, L. (2024). Reporting reliability, convergent and discriminant validity with structural equation modeling: A review and best-practice recommendations. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 41(2), 745–783. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Choiriyah, S., & Riyanto, S. (2021). Effect of training and competence on job satisfaction and its impact on employee commitment (Case study at BPJS Ketenagakerjaan). International Journal of Innovative Science and Research Technology, 6(6), 1021–1030. [Google Scholar]
  11. Cik, A., Asdar, M., Anwar, A., & Efendi, S. (2021). Impact of training and learning organization on employee competence and its implication on job satisfaction and employee performance of bank in Indonesia. Psychology and Education, 58(1), 140–156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Deci, E., & Ryan, R. (1985). Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior. Springer Science & Business Media. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Demircioglu, M. (2020). Sources of innovation, autonomy, and employee job satisfaction in public organizations. Public Performance & Management Review, 44(1), 155–186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Direção-Geral da Administração e do Emprego Público (DGAEP). (2025). Organização da administração do estado: Estrutura da AP. Available online: https://www.dgaep.gov.pt/index.cfm?OBJID=a5de6f93-bfb3-4bfc-87a2-4a7292719839&men=i (accessed on 14 February 2025).
  15. Dobrinić, D., & Fabac, R. (2021). Familiarity with mission and vision: Impact on organizational commitment and job satisfaction. Business Systems Research: International Journal of the Society for Advancing Innovation and Research in Economy, 12(1), 124–143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Elsafty, A., & Oraby, M. (2022). The impact of training on employee retention: An empirical research on the private sector in Egypt. International Journal of Business and Management, 17(5), 58–74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Fuchs, C., & Diamantopoulos, A. (2009). Using single-item measures for construct measurement in management research: Conceptual issues and application guidelines. Die Betriebswirtschaft, 69(2), 195–210. [Google Scholar]
  18. Gomathy, D., Avinash, M., Anirudh, M., & Manikanta, M. (2022). The talent management and employee job satisfaction. International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management, 6(3), 1–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Hackman, J., & Oldham, G. (1976). Motivation through the design of work: Test of a theory. Organizational Behavior & Human Performance, 16(2), 250–279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Hanaysha, J., & Tahir, P. (2016). Examining the effects of employee empowerment, teamwork, and employee training on job satisfaction. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 219(3), 272–282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Hayes, A. (2018). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach. The Guilford Press. [Google Scholar]
  22. Hossain, M., Jahan, N., Ahammed, B., Shohel, T., Khan, B., & Islam, M. (2022). A psychometric evaluation of fear of COVID-19 scale (FCV-19S). Hellenic Journal of Psychology, 19(1), 40–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Hu, L., & Bentler, P. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6(1), 1–55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Keeping, L., & Levy, P. (2000). Performance appraisal reactions: Measurement, modeling, and method bias. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85(5), 708–723. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Keltu, T. (2024). The effect of human resource development practice on employee performance with the mediating role of job satisfaction among Mizan Tepi University’s academic staff in Southwestern Ethiopia. Heliyon, 10(8), e29821. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Kim, T., Sezer, O., Schroeder, J., Risen, J., Gino, F., & Norton, M. I. (2021). Work group rituals enhance the meaning of work. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 165, 197–212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Kiyak, B., & Karkin, N. (2023). Job characteristics and public service motivation among highly-qualified public employees. Asia Pacific Journal of Public Administration, 45(3), 316–333. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Kock, F., Berbekova, A., & Assaf, A. (2021). Understanding and managing the threat of common method bias: Detection, prevention and control. Tourism Management, 86, 104330. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Kolk, B., & Kaufmann, W. (2019). Performance measurement, cognitive dissonance and coping strategies: Exploring individual responses to NPM-inspired output control. Journal of Management Control, 29(2), 93–113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Kumi, E., Osei, H., Asumah, S., & Yeboah, A. (2024). The impact of technology readiness and adapting behaviours in the workplace: A mediating effect of career adaptability. Future Business Journal, 10(1), 63–83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Lekić, N., Vapa-Tankosić, J., Rajaković-Mijailović, J., & Lekić, S. (2019). An analysis of factors influencing employee job satisfaction in a public sector. E+M: Ekonomie a Management, 22(3), 83–99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Madureira, C. (2020). The Public Administration reform and the welfare state evolution in Portugal: A recent history. Ler História, 76, 179–202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Madureira, C., Rando, B., & Ferraz, D. (2021). The public administration performance appraisal integrated system (SIADAP) and the Portuguese civil servants perceptions. International Journal of Public Administration, 44(4), 300–310. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Mampuru, M., Mokoena, B., & Isabirye, A. (2024). Training and development impact on job satisfaction, loyalty and retention among academics. SA Journal of Human Resource Management, 22, 2420–2431. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Mardia, K. (1980). 9 Tests of unvariate and multivariate normality. Handbook of statistics, 1, 279–320. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Mardia, K., Kent, J., & Taylor, C. (2024). Multivariate analysis. John Wiley & Sons. [Google Scholar]
  37. Martins, R., Lira, M., & Viseu, C. (2024). Aging and human resources management in the Portuguese public administration: The case of higher education. Coimbra Business Review, 2, 36–53. [Google Scholar]
  38. Marzec, I., & Austen, A. (2021). The role of training in improving employability, job satisfaction and the career success of public sector employees. Argumenta Oeconomica, 2(47), 187–204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Memon, M., Salleh, R., Mirza, M., Cheah, J., Ting, H., Ahmad, M., & Tariq, A. (2020). Satisfaction matters: The relationships between HRM practices, work engagement and turnover intention. International Journal of Manpower, 42(1), 21–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Moras, M., & Kashyap, B. (2021). Influence of job characteristics on employees’ job satisfaction: An empirical study. Turkish Journal of Computer and Mathematics Education, 12(11), 6499–6506. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Muzakky, A., & Wulansari, P. (2024). The effect of training and competency on career development: A conceptual framework. Journal of Business and Management Studies, 6(4), 163–167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Omar, E., Demong, N., Hassan, L., Hassan, N., & Alwi, A. (2022). The mediating roles of critical psychological factors towards the relationship between job characteristics and job outcomes: A conceptual framework. Voice of Academia, 18(1), 158–168. [Google Scholar]
  43. Perry, J., & Wise, L. (1990). The motivational bases of public service. Public Administration Review, 50, 367–373. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Presidência do Conselho de Ministros. (2024). Decreto-Lei n.º 12/2024, de 10 de janeiro (pp. 52–74). Diário da República, 1.ª série. Diário da República. [Google Scholar]
  45. Raisal, I., Nawaz, N., Appasamy, K., & Gajenderan, V. (2021). Effect of work motivation on employee job satisfaction in the context of public sector organization. Journal of Hunan University Natural Sciences, 48(11), 1–10. [Google Scholar]
  46. Rezmer, K. (2023). Job satisfaction of the public administration employees based on example local government uni. Kwartalnik Nauk o Przedsiębiorstwie, 70(4), 55–71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Rice, B., Martin, N., Fieger, P., & Hussain, T. (2022). Older healthcare workers’ satisfaction: Managing the interaction of age, job security expectations and autonomy. Employee Relations: The International Journal, 44(2), 319–334. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Rice, C., Searle, R., & Nienaber, A. (2025). Trust and public sector work: How public service motivation helps explain multi-level trust relations. In Handbook on trust in public governance (pp. 425–439). Edward Elgar Publishing. [Google Scholar]
  49. Riyanto, S., Handiman, U., Gultom, M., Gunawan, A., Putra, J., & Budiyanto, H. (2023). Increasing job satisfaction, organizational commitment and the requirement for competence and training. Emerging Science Journal, 7(2), 520–537. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Rodrigues, R., Gomes, C., & Junça-Silva, A. (2023). The role of satisfaction with the performance appraisal: A comparative study between the public and private sectors. Brazilian Business Management Magazine, 25(1), 72–87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Sabri, P., Ilyas, M., & Amjad, Z. (2011). Organizational culture and its impacts on the job satisfaction of the University teachers of Lahore. International Journal of Business and Social Science, 2(4), 121–128. [Google Scholar]
  52. Schmidt, S. (2004). The job training and job satisfaction survey technical manual; Advance online publication. Available online: https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED494451.pdf (accessed on 14 May 2025).
  53. Secchi, L., Caeiro, J., Ramos Pinto, R., & Arenilla Sáez, M. (2024). Administrative reforms in Portugal and Spain: From bureaucracy to digital transition. International Review of Administrative Sciences. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Shelden, D., & Sowa, J. (2011). Understanding performance appraisal: Social, organizational, and goal-based perspectives. Sage Publications. [Google Scholar]
  55. Siruri, M., & Cheche, S. (2021). Revisiting the Hackman and Oldham job characteristics model and Herzberg’s two factor theory: Propositions on how to make job enrichment effective in today’s organizations. European Journal of Business and Management Research, 6(2), 162–167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Spector, P. (2022). Job satisfaction: From assessment to intervention. Routledge. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Stazyk, E., Davis, R., & Liang, J. (2021). Probing the links between workforce diversity, goal clarity, and employee job satisfaction in public sector organizations. Administrative Sciences, 11(3), 77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Steil, A., Bello, J., Cuffa, D., & Freitas, A. (2022). Job satisfaction and employee retention by public and private it organizations. Revista de Administração da UFSM, 15(2), 354–369. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Thant, Z., & Chang, Y. (2021). Determinants of public employee job satisfaction in Myanmar: Focus on Herzberg’s two factor theory. Public Organization Review, 21(1), 157–175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Van Laar, S., & Braeken, J. (2021). Understanding the comparative fit index: It’s all about the base! Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 26(26), 26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Ventura-León, J., Peña-Calero, B., & Burga-León, A. (2023). The effect of normality and outliers on bivariate correlation coefficients in psychology: A Monte Carlo simulation. The Journal of General Psychology, 150(4), 405–422. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Wang, Q., Gan, K., Wei, H., Sun, A., Wang, Y., & Zhou, X. (2024). Public service motivation and public employees’ turnover intention: The role of job satisfaction and career growth opportunity. Personnel Review, 53(1), 99–118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Wang, X., & Cheng, Z. (2020). Cross-sectional studies: Strengths, weaknesses, and recommendations. Chest, 158(1), S65–S71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Weng, Q., & Hu, B. (2009). The structure of career growth and its impact on employees’ turnover intention. Industrial Engineering and Management, 14(1), 14–21. [Google Scholar]
  65. Widaman, K., & Helm, J. (2023). Exploratory factor analysis and confirmatory factor analysis. In H. Cooper, M. Coutanche, L. McMullen, A. Panter, D. Rindskopf, & K. Sher (Eds.), APA handbook of research methods in psychology: Data analysis and research publication (2nd ed., pp. 379–410). American Psychological Association. [Google Scholar]
  66. Wisse, B., van Eijbergen, R., Rietzschel, E., & Shiebe, S. (2018). Catering to the needs of an aging workforce: The role of employee age in the relationship between corporate social responsibility and employee satisfaction. Journal of Business Ethics, 147(4), 875–888. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Wuttaphan, N. (2017). Human capital theory: The theory of human resource development, implications, and future. Life Sciences and Environment Journal, 18(2), 240–253. [Google Scholar]
Figure 1. Sequential mediation model. Source: Authors’ own work.
Figure 1. Sequential mediation model. Source: Authors’ own work.
Admsci 15 00189 g001
Table 1. Sociodemographic profiles of the respondents.
Table 1. Sociodemographic profiles of the respondents.
VariablesN = 340
Gender (as indicated on ID)
Male142 (41.8%)
Female198 (58.2%)
Age group (M = 49.43; SD = 8.91)
≤44 years94 (27.6%)
45–54 years134 (39.4%)
≥55 years112 (32.9%)
Educational level
Below undergraduate degree52 (15.3%)
Undergraduate degree183 (53.8%)
Postgraduate degree105 (30.9%)
SIADAP subsystem
SIADAP 2 (middle managers)139 (40.9%)
SIADAP 3 (other employees)143 (42.1%)
Other system58 (17.1%)
Length of service (M = 21.67; SD = 9.24)
≤15 years 80 (23.5%)
16–25 years133 (39.1%)
≥26 years127 (37.4%)
Note: M = mean; SD = standard deviation.
Table 2. Descriptive statistics, reliability, and validity indices.
Table 2. Descriptive statistics, reliability, and validity indices.
VariableMSDCRAVEMSV1234
1. JS3.23 10.900.860.770.32(0.80)
2. Training3.29 10.880.910.810.400.446 **(0.86)
3. CA3.15 10.940.980.830.400.392 **0.630 **(0.95)
4. CP1.96 10.810.890.820.320.555 **0.324 **0.393 **(0.83)
5. PA 2-----0.187 **0.0590.108 *0.201 **
Age49.438.91---0.110−0.0890.0360.093
LoS21.679.24---0.105−0.0870.0370.096
Note: N = 401; JS = job satisfaction; CA = competency acquisition; CP = career progression; PA = performance appraisal; LoS = length of service; * p < 0.05; ** p < 0.001; M = mean; SD = standard deviation; CR = composite reliability; AVE = average variance extracted. 1 Scale ranging from 1 to 5; Cronbach’s alpha values are in brackets. 2 Single-item assessment. Source: Author’s own work.
Table 3. Comparison of the mediation paths linking training to job satisfaction.
Table 3. Comparison of the mediation paths linking training to job satisfaction.
Effects Bootstrapping CI
Total indirect EffectBSELowerUpper
Model 1: Training → Competency acquisition → Job satisfaction0.0000.043−0.0820.089
Model 2: Training → PA → Job satisfaction0.0040.008−0.0100.023
Model 3: Training → Career progression → Job satisfaction0.0660.0330.0010.128
Model 4: Training → Competency acquisition → PA → Job satisfaction0.0080.006−0.0010.024
Model 5: Training → Competency acquisition → Career progression → Job satisfaction0.0930.0230.0500.141
Model 6: Training → PA → Career progression → Job satisfaction0.0020.005−0.0050.013
Model 7: Training → Competency acquisition → PA → Career progression → Job satisfaction0.0050.0040.0010.013
Note. B = Unstandardized beta; SE = standard error; CI = confidence interval. Source. Author’s own work.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Silva, M.; Rodrigues, R.I. Training and Job Satisfaction in Portugal’s Public Sector: A Sequential Mediation Model Based on Competency Acquisition, Performance Appraisal, and Career Progression. Adm. Sci. 2025, 15, 189. https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci15050189

AMA Style

Silva M, Rodrigues RI. Training and Job Satisfaction in Portugal’s Public Sector: A Sequential Mediation Model Based on Competency Acquisition, Performance Appraisal, and Career Progression. Administrative Sciences. 2025; 15(5):189. https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci15050189

Chicago/Turabian Style

Silva, Manuela, and Rosa Isabel Rodrigues. 2025. "Training and Job Satisfaction in Portugal’s Public Sector: A Sequential Mediation Model Based on Competency Acquisition, Performance Appraisal, and Career Progression" Administrative Sciences 15, no. 5: 189. https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci15050189

APA Style

Silva, M., & Rodrigues, R. I. (2025). Training and Job Satisfaction in Portugal’s Public Sector: A Sequential Mediation Model Based on Competency Acquisition, Performance Appraisal, and Career Progression. Administrative Sciences, 15(5), 189. https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci15050189

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop