Next Article in Journal
Exploring the Influence of Industrial and Climatic Variables on Communities of Benthic Macroinvertebrates Collected in Streams and Lakes in Canada’s Oil Sands Region
Next Article in Special Issue
Dynamics of Vegetation and Climate Change
Previous Article in Journal
Modeling of Forest Ecosystem Degradation Due to Anthropogenic Stress: The Case of Rohingya Influx into the Cox’s Bazar–Teknaf Peninsula of Bangladesh
Previous Article in Special Issue
Accounting for DEM Error in Sea Level Rise Assessment within Riverine Regions; Case Study from the Shatt Al-Arab River Region
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Environments
Volume 8
Issue 11
10.3390/environments8110122
environments-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Short Term Elevated CO2 Interacts with Iron Deficiency, Further Repressing Growth, Photosynthesis and Mineral Accumulation in Soybean (Glycine max L.) and Common Bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.)

by
Teresa Deuchande
*,
José Soares
,
Fábio Nunes
,
Elisabete Pinto
and
Marta W. Vasconcelos
Universidade Católica Portuguesa, CBQF—Centro de Biotecnologia e Química Fina—Laboratório Associado, Escola Superior de Biotecnologia, Rua Diogo Botelho 1327, 4169-005 Porto, Portugal
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Environments 2021, 8(11), 122; https://doi.org/10.3390/environments8110122
Submission received: 12 September 2021 / Revised: 27 October 2021 / Accepted: 29 October 2021 / Published: 8 November 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Dynamic of Vegetation and Climate Change)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Elevated CO2 (eCO2) has been reported to cause mineral losses in several important food crops such as soybean (Glycine max L.) and common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.). In addition, more than 30% of the world’s arable land is calcareous, leading to iron (Fe) deficiency chlorosis and lower Fe levels in plant tissues. We hypothesize that there will be combinatorial effects of eCO2 and Fe deficiency on the mineral dynamics of these crops at a morphological, biochemical and physiological level. To test this hypothesis, plants were grown hydroponically under Fe sufficiency (20 μM Fe-EDDHA) or deficiency (0 μM Fe-EDDHA) at ambient CO2 (aCO2, 400 ppm) or eCO2 (800 ppm). Plants of both species exposed to eCO2 and Fe deficiency showed the lowest biomass accumulation and the lowest root: shoot ratio. Soybean at eCO2 had significantly higher chlorophyll levels (81%, p < 0.0001) and common bean had significantly higher photosynthetic rates (60%, p < 0.05) but only under Fe sufficiency. In addition, eCO2 increased ferric chelate reductase acivity (FCR) in Fe-sufficient soybean by 4-fold (p < 0.1) and in Fe-deficient common bean plants by 10-fold (p < 0.0001). In common bean, an interactive effect of both environmental factors was observed, resulting in the lowest root Fe levels. The lowering of Fe accumulation in both crops under eCO2 may be linked to the low root citrate accumulation in these plants when grown with unrestricted Fe supply. No changes were observed for malate in soybean, but in common bean, shoot levels were significantly lower under Fe deficiency (77%, p < 0.05) and Fe sufficiency (98%, p < 0.001). These results suggest that the mechanisms involved in reduced Fe accumulation caused by eCO2 and Fe deficiency may not be independent, and an interaction of these factors may lead to further reduced Fe levels.

1. Introduction

Atmospheric CO2 is one of the main drivers of climate change. In June of 2021 [1] global CO2 concentrations were 418.7 ppm, but these are predicted to double by the end of this century [2] Elevated CO2 (eCO2) is known to affect plant growth, crop yield and nutritional status of agricultural products. Although it seems to induce higher growth and yield [3,4,5,6,7,8,9] a number of studies making use of meta-analysis methodologies showed reduced mineral or protein concentrations in several crop species such as wheat, barley, rice, common bean, soybean, among others [10,11,12,13,14]. In previous studies, eCO2 has been reported to induce photosynthesis [15], stomatal closure [2,16,17] and increase the levels of leaf organic acids concentrations [18,19,20]. Organic acid release is well known to be associated with iron (Fe) uptake and transport within the xylem [21,22,23], and reduced stomatal conductance and transpiration rates, may reduce mineral uptake through the xylem sap since transpiration-driven mass flow from root to other organs may be reduced [24,25].
Fe deficiency is another factor highly affecting the nutritional status of food crops. The insoluble nature of Fe in calcareous soils, which represent about 30% of the world’s arable land, imposes restricted Fe supply for plant growth leading to reduced yields and lower nutritional quality [26]. Under Fe deficiency, plants develop typical symptoms of Fe deficiency chlorosis (IDC), such as yellowing of the upper leaves and interveinal chlorosis. These symptoms, depending on the crop, are particularly visible in the first two to three weeks after seed emergence. Legumes are particularly prone to IDC, their nutritional value is further jeopardized by eCO2 and they provide a large share of the global population’s diet. Common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris) comprises 50% of grain legumes consumed worldwide being the most important for direct human consumption [27] especially in Latin America and Africa [28] and in 2017 the production surpassed 31 million metric tons (FAO statistics). Soybean (Glycine max.) is the most produced legume crop worldwide, more than 230 million metric tons being produced per year [29], and cultivated on an estimated 6% of the world’s arable land.
In this scenario of global legume dependency, reductions on the mineral levels of these important crops, due to increasing CO2 and Fe deficiency, will aggravate current dietary deficiencies, particularly in countries whose primary dietary sources are grain legumes. Dietary deficiencies are already a major global public health problem. More than two billion people suffer from Fe deficiency anemia, leading to reduced growth in childhood, reduced ability to fight off infections and higher rates of maternal and child deaths [13], causing the loss of 63 million life-years annually [30].
Although there is evidence that there will be nutrient losses from eCO2 and Fe deficiency, there is little knowledge on the mechanisms involved in these losses, and no studies have been done on the combined effect of these two environmental changes in legumes. Previous studies mainly focused on eCO2 combined with changes in nitrogen (N) [15,31,32,33,34,35,36], phosphorous (P) [37,38,39,40], magnesium (Mg) [41,42] and potassium (K) availability [7,43], with only one on Fe [44].
Strategy I plants such as legumes rely on an Fe reduction mechanism in their roots to acquire Fe (Blair et al., 2010). This mechanism involves (i) the activity of a membrane bound Fe chelate reductase, and the extrusion of organic acids (particularly malate and citrate, which are associated with Fe uptake and transport within the xylem), and protons, which solubilizes Fe prior to uptake [45].
The objective of this study is to understand the individual and combined effects of Fe deficiency and eCO2 on plant growth (biomass accumulation and partitioning), physiology (chlorophyll and photosynthetic activity), mineral nutrition (Fe, Zn, Mg, Mn, K and P) and biochemistry, by looking at rate limiting steps associated with Fe uptake including Fe reductase activity and malate and citrate accumulation. This study also aims to understand if the influence of eCO2 and Fe deficiency on Fe-related processes in legumes is species dependent.

2. Materials and methods

2.1. Plant Material and Growth Conditions

Seeds of G. max cv. “Thorne” and P. vulgaris cv. “Papo de Rola” were rolled in filter paper humidified daily with water and placed vertically for seven days in the dark, at 25 °C. Germinated seedlings were transferred to 5 L hydroponic vessels (three vessels with five seedlings per vessel). The vessels were placed in a climate chamber (Aralab Fitoclima 10000EHF) with 16 h day photoperiod providing 325 μmol s−1 m−2 of photosynthetic photon flux density at plant level supplied by a mixture of incandescent bulbs and fluorescent lights. Temperatures were set to 25 °C during the light period and to 20 °C during the dark period, whereas relative humidity (RH) was maintained at 75% throughout day and night.
Plants grew in hydroponics under ambient CO2 (aCO2, 400 ppm) and eCO2 (800 ppm) for three weeks. The standard solution for hydroponic growth of both cultivars included: 1.2 mM KNO3; 0.8 mM Ca(NO3)2; 0.2 mM MgSO4·H2O; 0.3 mM; NH4H2PO4; 25 mM CaCl2; 25 mM H3BO3; 0.5 mM MnSO4; 2 mM; ZnSO4·H2O; 0.5 mM CuSO4·H2O; 0.5 mM MoO3; 0.1 mM NiSO4. The hydroponic solution was buffered with 1 mM 2-(N-morpholino) ethanesulfonic acid (MES), pH 5.5. Plants grew for six days under complete solution with 20 μM Fe(III)-EDDHA (ethylenediamine-N,N_bis(o-hydroxyphenyl) acetic acid) followed by two weeks treatment with 0 and 20 μM Fe(III)-EDDHA. After two weeks under the settled conditions, a set of measurements was performed in these plants including chlorophyll levels, photosynthetic rates, Fe reductase activity and dry weight of leaves, stems and roots. One set of leaf and root samples from five individual plants of each treatment was dried for mineral analysis whereas another set of samples from the same tissues of other five individual plants of each treatment was frozen under N2 for the analysis of organic acids.

2.2. Morphometric Parameters

The chlorophyll levels were assessed with Soil and Plant Analyzer Development (SPAD) readings, measured with a portable chlorophyll meter (Konica Minolta SPAD-502 Plus; Minolta, Osaka, Japan), using the youngest trifoliate leaf of five independent biological replicates. The roots, shoots and leaves were separated, and the dry weights of these organs were determined.

2.3. Photosynthesis

The photosynthetic rate was measured using an infrared gas analyzer (IRGA) LI-6400XT Portable Photosynthesis System (LI-COR Inc., Lincoln, CA, USA) by attaching the IRGA chamber to the most expanded leaf of the youngest trifoliate. The measurements were taken in the following conditions: leaf temperature at 25 °C, photosynthetically active photon flux density at 500 μmol m−2 s−1, CO2 concentration at 400 μmol CO2 mol−1 for plant grown under aCO2 and 800 μmol CO2 mol−1 for plants grown under eCO2, and flow rate at 500 μmol s−1. The measurements were conducted in five individual plants from each growth condition.

2.4. Ferric Chelate Reductase (FCR) Assay

Fe reductase activity was measured as described by Grusak et al. (1990) except that ferrozine was used instead of BPDS (bathophenanthroline disulfonic acid). Measurements were performed in whole intact roots of five individual plants where Fe reduction was followed by the spectrophotometric measurement of Fe2+ chelated to ferrozine (3-(2-Pyridyl)-5,6-diphenyl-1,2,4-triazine-4′,4′′-disulfonic acid sodium salt). Roots of each intact plant were submerged in assay solution containing 1.2 mM KNO3, 0.8 mM Ca(NO3)2, 0.3 mM NH4H2PO4, 0.2 mM MgSO4, 25 µM CaCl2, 25 µM H3BO3, 0.5 µM MnSO4, 2 µM ZnSO4, 0.5 µM CuSO4, 0.5 µM MoO3, 0.1 µM NiSO4, 100 µM Fe(III)-EDTA (ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid) and 300 μM ferrozine; all buffered with 1 mM 2-[N-morpholino]ethanesulfonic acid (MES), pH 5.5. The assays were conducted under dim light conditions at 20 °C. After 45 min the roots were removed from the assay solution. Ferrozine–Fe(II) was measured by absorbance at 562 nm (subtracting blanks of assay solution with no plants) and reduced Fe was calculated using the extinction coefficient of 28.16 mM cm−1.

2.5. Organic Acids

The extraction and analysis of organic acids was performed as described by Vasconcelos et al. (2014) with slight modifications. Leaf and root samples from five individual plants of each treatment, previously frozen in liquid nitrogen, were grinded in a ceramic mortar and pestle with 2 mL of 2.5 mM sulfuric acid. Homogenates were boiled for 30 min, filtered with a 0.2 µm PTFE filter, and kept at −80 °C until HPLC analysis. Organic anions were analysed with an HPLC system (Lachrom, Merck Hitachi, Darmstadt, Germany) composed of an ion exchange Aminex HPX 87ECOlumn (300 × 7.8 mm) maintained at 65 °C and two detectors in series: refractive index and absorbance (220 nm). The mobile phase was 2.5 mM sulfuric acid, flown at a rate of 0.8 mL min−1. The injection volume was 50 µL and the running time, 30 min. Peaks corresponding to citric and malic acids were identified by comparison of their retention times with those of known standards from Sigma (St. Louis, MO, USA). Quantification was made with known amounts of each organic anion using peak areas.

2.6. Minerals

Dried leaf and root powder (200 mg) was mixed with 5 mL of 65% HNO3 plus 1 mL 30% H2O2 in a Teflon reaction vessel and digested in a microwave system (Speedwave MWS-3+, Berghof, Eningen, Germany). Digestion was conducted in five steps: 130 °C for 5 min; 160 °C for 10 min; 170 °C for 10 min; 100 °C for 2 min and 100 °C for 2 min. The resulting solutions were filtered and brought up to 50 mL with ultrapure water for analysis. Mineral concentrations were analysed by inductively coupled plasma argon spectrometry (ICP; ICP-OES Optima 7000 DV, PerkinElmer, Waltham, MA, USA). Five biological replicates of each treatment were analysed in triplicate. Mineral concentrations were expressed in mg kg−1 dry weight.

2.7. Statistical Analysis

Data were analyzed with GraphPad Prism version 6. Differences among treatments were tested with two-way ANOVA, and the separation of means was performed using the corrected multiple comparisons Tukey test (p < 0.05).

3. Results

3.1. Biomass Accumulation

Plants grown under different Fe supplies and atmospheric CO2 concentrations showed distinct biomass accumulation patterns. The trifoliate biomass of soybean plants was not affected by Fe deficiency or eCO2 individually. However, Fe deficiency combined with eCO2 (−Fe/eCO2) decreased leaf biomass accumulation by 52%. (p < 0.05) (Figure 1a). The stem and root biomass of soybean plants were not significantly affected by restricted Fe supply (Figure 1b,c) but under Fe sufficiency, plants exposure to eCO2 stimulated root biomass accumulation by 52% (p < 0.05) whereas under Fe deficiency, eCO2 decreased root biomass accumulation by 38% (p < 0.05) (Figure 1c). In addition, the root to shoot ratio was significantly higher (52%, p < 0.05) in the plants growing under Fe sufficiency at eCO2, compared with plants from the other conditions (Figure 1d). Similarly to the observed for soybean, in common bean plants Fe restriction and eCO2 individually had no effect on trifoliate biomass (Figure 1e). However, when Fe deficiency was combined with eCO2, the trifoliate biomass sharply decreased by about 88% (p < 0.0001) compared with control plants (+Fe/aCO2). Fe restriction slightly induced stem and root biomass accumulation but eCO2 seemed not to have a significant effect on stem biomass (Figure 1f,g). In contrast, eCO2 highly reduced root biomass of Fe deficient plants (Figure 1g). Still, the root: shoot ratio of common bean plants of all treatments was not significantly different (Figure 1h) indicating that the metabolic changes caused by both factors may not have disturbed significantly common bean growth.

3.2. Photosynthesis and Photosynthetic Pigments

In contrast to plants growing under Fe sufficiency, plants of both species grown under Fe deficiency showed IDC symptoms, presenting 40–65% lower chlorophyll levels (Figure 2a,d). Under Fe sufficiency, soybean plants growing at eCO2 showed significantly higher chlorophyll levels (81%, p < 0.0001) and higher photosynthetic rates (65%, not significant) than under aCO2 (Figure 2a,b). These CO2 effects were only observed under Fe sufficiency. Similarly, in common bean, the photosynthetic rate of Fe sufficient plants growing under eCO2 was significantly higher (6%, p < 0.05) (Figure 2e) but not the chlorophyll levels, for which differences were not significant (Figure 2d). Chlorophyll levels were not significantly affected by CO2 (Figure 2a,d) under Fe deficiency. However, in common bean, eCO2 seemed to have acted synergistically with Fe deficiency in decreasing photosynthesis (Figure 2e).

3.3. Ferric Chelate Reductase (FCR) Activity

Fe deficiency did not significantly affect FCR activity under aCO2, but under eCO2, FCR activity was increased in both Fe treatments (Figure 2c,f). In soybean the increase was more pronounced in the presence of Fe (4-fold higher) whereas in bean it was most significant in the absence of Fe (10-fold higher) (Figure 2c,f).

3.4. Organic Acids

In soybean, citric and malic acid concentrations decreased by 98% (p < 0.05) in the leaves and roots of Fe sufficient plants at eCO2 compared with control plants (Figure 3a); and the levels of malic acid were reduced by 95% (p < 0.01) in the leaves of Fe deficient plants exposed to eCO2 compared with control plants (Figure 3b). However, under Fe deficiency, despite that the levels of these organic acids tended to decrease slightly, the difference was not significant when compared to control plants (Figure 3a). A similar pattern was observed for common bean. Both citric and malic acid concentrations tended to be lower in the plants grown under eCO2 in each Fe condition. At +Fe/aCO2 they decreased 82% (p < 0.05) in the roots, and at −Fe/eCO2 the levels of these organic acids were totally depleted (Figure 3c,d).
In common bean, under −Fe/aCO2, citric acid was reduced 59% (p < 0.1) and malic acid by 99% (p < 0.05) in the roots but not in the leaves (Figure 3c,d). In addition, under −Fe/eCO2 the levels of malic acid were totally depleted in the roots of soybean and common bean and the levels of citric acid were undetected in the roots of common bean.

3.5. Mineral Accumulation

3.5.1. Effect of eCO2

In the leaves of both soybean and common bean plants grown under eCO2, the levels of the analysed minerals were not significantly different, independently of the Fe supply, indicating that under eCO2, Fe restriction has no effect on leaf mineral concentrations (Figure 4). In contrast, when looking only at the effect of eCO2, the results clearly showed a direct effect of eCO2 in decreasing leaf mineral levels. In soybean grown under Fe sufficiency, plant exposure to eCO2 decreased the levels of Fe by 82% (p < 0.01), Zn by 78% (p < 0.01), Mg, 57% (p < 0.05) and Mn by 62% (p < 0.01), whereas in common bean leaves the levels of Zn and Mn decreased by 76% (p < 0.01) and 81% (p < 0.01) under eCO2, respectively (Figure 4).
In the roots of plants of both species, the same pattern was observed. Under each Fe condition, the levels of all analysed minerals decreased in the plant roots of both species under eCO2 compared to aCO2 (Figure 4).

3.5.2. Effect of Fe Restriction

The mineral levels of both soybean and common bean plants were highly impacted by restricted Fe supply. In the leaves of soybean plants grown under −Fe/aCO2, except for phosphorous (P), the levels of all analysed minerals were lower than the observed in plants grown under +Fe/aCO2 (Figure 4a–e). Among the analysed minerals, Fe was the only one that decreased significantly, by 75% (p < 0.01), under −Fe/aCO2 compared to +Fe/aCO2. In contrast, in common bean leaves the levels of Fe, Zn and K tended to be higher in −Fe/aCO2 compared with +Fe/aCO2. For instance, the levels of Fe increased significantly by 73% (p < 0.01) whereas the levels of Zn increased by 11% and K levels augmented 48% but not significantly (Figure 4g,h,k).
In the roots of soybean plants grown under −Fe/aCO2, the levels of Fe, Zn, Mg and Mn tended to be lower than under +Fe/aCO2 but the differences were significant only for Fe which levels decreased by 95% (p < 0.0001) under Fe limitation (Figure 4a–d,f). The same tendency was observed in common bean roots in regard to Fe and Zn. However, whereas under −Fe/aCO2 the levels of Fe decreased significantly by 46% (p < 0.0001) compared with plants grown under +Fe/aCO2, the levels of P doubled under Fe restriction.

3.5.3. Interactive Effect of eCO2 and Restricted Fe Supply

An interactive effect of both factors leading to reduced mineral concentration was evident on Fe accumulation in common bean roots and to some extent soybean leaves (Figure 4a,g).
The results clearly showed an effect of eCO2 in decreasing the Fe levels in the leaves of both species. In soybean, eCO2 had a similar effect of Fe restriction, and the Fe levels were the lowest when both factors were combined. Under eCO2 at each Fe supply regime the Fe levels were reduced by 80–82% (p < 0.05) (compared to aCO2 plants, and under Fe deficiency the levels of Fe were reduced by about 71–72% in each CO2 concentration (p < 0.0). The lowest Fe levels were measured in the leaves of Fe deficient soybean plants under eCO2 (−Fe/eCO2) (Figure 4g),
In common bean leaves the levels of Fe increased under Fe restriction at aCO2 (−Fe/aCO2) but at eCO2 (−Fe/eCO2) the levels were similar to those of Fe sufficient plants regardless the CO2 concentration (Figure 4g). However, a cumulative effect of these factors leading to further reduced Fe levels was observed in common bean roots. In soybean roots the effect of Fe deficiency alone was not significantly different from the effect of Fe deficiency combined with eCO2 (−Fe/eCO2) (Figure 4a). However, Fe deficient common bean plants grown under eCO2 (−Fe/eCO2) showed the lowest Fe levels in the roots and the difference was significant compared with the levels found in the plants of all the other growing conditions (Figure 4g). In addition, under aCO2 Fe deficient common bean plants (−Fe/aCO2) had root−Fe levels significantly higher than Fe sufficient plants (+Fe/aCO2); and Fe deficient plants grown under eCO2 (−Fe/eCO2) showed lower root Fe levels than plants grown under aCO2 (−Fe/aCO2) (Figure 4g).
Regarding the other analysed minerals, no significant differences were found when looking at the interaction of the effects of both factors.

4. Discussion

4.1. Elevated CO2 and Fe Restriction Led to General Biomass Decrease in Both Legume Species

Plants growing under different Fe supply and atmospheric CO2 concentrations showed different biomasses. Elevated CO2 on its own tended to stimulate soybean but not common bean growth, suggesting a species dependent effect (Figure 1). The largest effect of eCO2 occurred in soybean roots, with Fe sufficient plants showing higher biomass. Increased leaf and root biomass accumulation under eCO2 have been previously reported for soybean [46,47] and common bean plants [37,48], and the root is the organ more often reported to be highly affected by increasing atmospheric CO2 concentrations. Despite the results of several studies conducted in soybean consistently showing that eCO2 increases leaf and root biomass [15], for common bean, the effect of eCO2 on increased biomass allocation seems to be dependent on the bean cultivar [48]. For instance, Salsman et al. [49] showed that eCO2 had no impact on root and shoot growth and this result is in accordance with our findings where no significant differences on leaf and root biomass were found in common bean plants.
An interactive effect between eCO2 and Fe restriction led to general biomass decrease in both crop species (Figure 1a,c,e,g). Under eCO2 it is known that photosynthesis and biomass accumulation are stimulated [46,50,51,52] and the requirement for nutrients increases [37,38,41,53]. Therefore, stimulation of biomass build-up may be a drawback when plants are growing under Fe limitation. Fe plays an important role in plant development since it is involved in several metabolic processes such as photosynthesis, respiration, nitrogen fixation, DNA synthesis, hormone production, and chlorophyll formation being also an important co-factor of several enzymes [54]. Under eCO2, as plant growth is stimulated, the requirements for Fe increase and the plant may invest its resources on increasing Fe uptake and transportation. Since these processes require increasing energy supply, the plant utilizes its resources in these processes and biomass accumulation is reduced. In contrast, at eCO2, plants under optimal nutritional conditions may invest in root growth in order to cope with the increasing plant demand for nutrients.
Here the results clearly show for both species that there is an interactive effect between Fe deficiency and eCO2 on decreasing trifoliate and root biomass accumulation. To the best of our knowledge there is only one study addressing the combined effect of Fe deficiency and eCO2 in plant growth and nutrition [44]. This previous study was conducted in tomato and showed that plant exposure to eCO2 significantly increased root and shoot biomass regardless of Fe supply, but the root:shoot ratio was significantly higher only in plants growing at eCO2 under Fe limitation and not under Fe sufficiency. These results indicate that in tomato there is also an interactive effect of Fe deficiency and eCO2 impacting the whole plant growth but, in contrast to our study, in tomato the effect was positive, increasing biomass accumulation. Despite the contrasting results, in both studies an interactive effect of Fe deficiency and eCO2 interfering in biomass accumulation was observed. The differences in biomass accumulation patterns suggest that the interaction of both factors is species dependent or there may be differences in trial conditions, namely in the method used for restricting Fe supply to the plant and time-point of analysis.

4.2. Depending on the Legume Species, eCO2 Stimulates Photosynthesis, but in Combination with Fe Deficiency, This Effect Is Lost

In contrast with plants growing under Fe sufficiency, plants of both species grown under Fe deficiency showed IDC symptoms with 40–65% (p < 0.0001) lower chlorophyll levels (Figure 2a,d). It is well known that Fe deficiency leads to a decrease in the concentration of several foliar pigments, such as chlorophylls and carotenoids, and results in a sharp growth reduction [55,56]. The main symptom of this deficiency is the leaf yellowing and development of chlorosis in the youngest plant leaves.
Under Fe sufficiency, soybean and common bean plants growing at eCO2 showed higher photosynthetic rates than under aCO2 (Figure 2a,b). As C3 plants, soybean and bean are highly dependent on atmospheric CO2 levels for photosynthesis catalyzed by Ribulose-1,5-bisphosphate carboxylase/oxygenase (Rubisco). This enzyme has higher affinity for CO2 than O2, but when CO2 concentrations are limited, which is the case for example during stomatal closure, Rubisco binds oxygen, and photorespiration is induced. Thus, carboxylation becomes the rate-limiting step in C3 photosynthesis [50] and carbon fixation. Accordingly, in an environment with enriched CO2 levels, photosynthesis is expected to increase, as observed in this study, and this effect has been previously reported for several species [16,39,50,57,58,59,60].
In contrast with soybean, in common bean plants, eCO2 seems to have acted synergistically with Fe deficiency in decreasing photosynthesis (Figure 2e). This result suggests that under Fe deficiency, eCO2 may induce a downward acclimation, i.e., a downregulation of photosynthesis. The acclimation process is believed to result from plants’ inability to fully utilize the extra photosynthate produced as a result of plant exposure to eCO2 [41,61,62]. Since, under Fe deficiency the chlorophyll levels of common bean plants grown under both CO2 conditions was almost the same, the absence of Fe may possibly have determined this inability. The observed sharp induction of ferric chelate reductase (FCR) activity in these plants (Figure 2f) indicates that they were highly stressed and requiring increased Fe uptake, probably because Fe is involved in many metabolic processes including plant respiration.
In general, the results suggest that under Fe sufficiency, eCO2 may induce photosynthesis but under Fe restriction, it may contribute to increase the incidence, severity, and earlier occurrence of IDC depending on the legume species.

4.3. Ferric Chelate Reductase Activity Is Stimulated under eCO2

Both soybean and common bean are Strategy I plants, i.e., they first reduce Fe from the ferric to ferrous form in order to transport it via xylem or phloem [63]. There are a number of studies reporting the induction of FCR activity under Fe deficiency in several species including common bean plants [64,65,66,67] among others [68,69,70]. For both soybean and common bean growing under aCO2, Fe restriction did not significantly affect FCR activity (Figure 2a,d). FCR activity in plants growing under Fe deficiency is generally induced [71], but some studies report a decreasing activity of this enzyme in soybean plants growing under restricted Fe supply [72,73]. In fact, there are studies evidencing that FCR activity is species and cultivar dependent [67,74], which may explain our contrasting results.
When looking at the effect of CO2, for both species, FCR activity was higher under eCO2 regardless of the Fe treatment (Figure 2c,f); however, the effect was species’ specific. In soybean FCR was 4-fold higher in the presence of Fe, whereas in common bean it was 10-fold higher in the absence of Fe (Figure 2c,f). In tomato, eCO2 has been shown to induce FCR activity when plants were grown under Fe deficiency but not under Fe sufficiency [44]. These are contrasting results showing that the combination of specific nutritional deficiencies with eCO2 induces species dependent behaviors, and the significantly higher FCR activity of common bean plants growing in the absence of Fe also suggests that this common bean genotype has higher tolerance to Fe deficiency than the soybean genotype used in this study.

4.4. Elevated CO2 Reduces the Organic Acid Levels in the Leaves and Roots of Soybean and Common Bean

Organic acids, particularly citric and malic acid, are involved in metal cation uptake. Citrate is known to chelate ferric Fe, facilitating its transportation within the plant for subsequent reduction by a plasma membrane Fe reductase enzyme [23]. In addition, the formation of malic acid in the root is believed to be induced under Fe deficiency to ensure a sufficient energy charge to maintain the required performance of the Fe uptake mechanism.
In soybean leaves and roots, citric and malic acid concentrations decreased significantly under the influence of eCO2. Similarly, in common bean the levels of these organic acids also tended to be lower in the plants grown under eCO2 in each Fe condition. This tendency has been previously reported in wheat leaves [75] and in Arabidopsis roots [19] of plants grown under eCO2.
In common bean, Fe deficiency on its own (−Fe/aCO2) lowered the levels of citric and malic acid in the roots but not in leaves (Figure 3c,d). Under Fe deficiency, the levels of organic acids are generally reported to increase in the roots of a number of crops [22,23,76]. Despite that in soybean roots the levels of these acids tended to increase or remain stable (Figure 3a,b), in common bean roots the levels of citric acid tended to decrease and malic acid significantly decreased (Figure 3c,d). Malate and citrate have been shown to decrease in roots of an Fe tolerant grapevine cultivar grown under Fe deprivation, when compared to a tolerant one [77]. Considering the evidence of common bean tolerance to Fe deficiency, provided by the differences on FCR activity (see section above), the results of our study are in accordance with those previously reported for grapevine.
In addition, when Fe deficiency was combined with eCO2 the levels of malic acid were totally depleted in the roots of the plants of both species and the levels of citric acid were undetected in the roots of common bean. These results evidence a putative interaction of both effects inducing the extinction of both organic acids, suggesting that beyond the direct effect of eCO2, an interactive effect of both factors exists determining the depletion of these organic acids or the inhibition of their formation in these crop species.

4.5. The Mineral Levels of Both Soybean and Common Bean Plants Are Highly Affected by eCO2 and Fe Deficiency on Their Own and in Combination

When looking at the effect of eCO2 alone, in general, the levels of Fe, Zn, Mg, Mn and K were lower in the leaves and roots of both species when plants were grown under Fe sufficiency. The levels of P were only lower in the roots (Figure 4). Previous works showed that eCO2 has a significant negative impact on the nutritional status of several crops, decreasing the levels of Zn and Fe in soybean [30]. Loladze (2014, 2002) [13,14] using a meta-analysis approach, unequivocally showed that eCO2 induces mineral losses in foliar tissues and grains or edible tissues. The mechanism by which mineral concentrations decrease when plants are exposed to eCO2 is still unknown. Recently, a down-regulation of the expression of genes involved in Fe transport has been suggested [78]. Yet, eCO2 is also known to: (i) induce photosynthesis, carboxylation and phosphorylation, increasing the levels of sugars and organic acids [18,19,20], and (ii) reduce stomatal conductance with consequent transpiration reduction [16]. In addition, the two species had a contrasting behavior regarding FCR activation when growing under Fe limitation, which might also explain the different patterns of Fe accumulation. In fact, the increased activity of FCR in common bean, particularly under eCO2, highlights its higher capacity to counteract Fe deficiency. Another hypothesis is that this genotype is tolerant to Fe deficiency, whereas the soybean genotype may not be. In fact, soybean cv. ‘Williams’, the one used in this study, has been previously reported to be susceptible to develop IDC [73]. The effect of Fe deficiency on mineral accumulation was evident in the leaves and roots of soybean plants with lower Fe levels under Fe deficiency (−Fe/aCO2) compared to Fe sufficiency (+Fe/aCO2). A similar pattern was observed in the root of common bean plants but in the leaves the Fe levels increased under Fe restriction (−Fe/aCO2). These results highlight the behavior differences among legume species when exposed to eCO2 and Fe restriction individually. These two species had a contrasting behavior regarding FCR activation when growing under Fe limitation, which explains the different patterns of Fe accumulation. In fact, the increased activity of FCR in common bean, particularly under eCO2, highlights the highest capacity of common bean plants to counteract Fe deficiency. Another hypothesis is that this particular common bean genotype is tolerant to Fe deficiency, being able to efficiently cope with this stress, whereas the soybean genotype may not be. Soybean cultivar ‘Williams’, the one used in this study, has been previously reported to be susceptible to develop IDC (Santos et al., 2013).
Here, an interactive effect of Fe deficiency and eCO2 led to reduced Fe accumulation in common bean root and further reduced Fe accumulation in the leaves of soybean (Figure 4a,g). Although the Fe levels measured in the leaves of Fe deficient soybean plants under eCO2 (−Fe/eCO2) (Figure 4g) were not significantly different from the levels found in the plants exposed to just a single factor, it suggests that the two factors together may further reduce Fe uptake (Figure 4a). Altogether, the results herein presented suggest that the mechanisms involved in reduced Fe accumulation caused by Fe deficiency and eCO2 are different but may not be independent.

5. Conclusions

The results clearly show an independent effect of eCO2 and Fe deficiency in decreasing the Fe levels in the leaves and roots of the plants of both legume species. A cumulative effect of these factors leading to a further reduction of Fe levels was observed in common bean roots where the activity of FCR was the highest and the levels of organic acids were the lowest; these plants were also highly repressed photosynthetically. These results suggest that the mechanisms involved in reduced Fe accumulation caused by eCO2 and Fe deficiency may not be independent, and an interaction of these factors may lead to further reduced Fe levels. If so, it may negatively affect human population diets, particularly of those dependent on Fe from plant sources or those which already suffer from Fe deficiency.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, T.D., J.S., F.N., E.P. and M.W.V.; Formal analysis, T.D.; Funding acquisition, M.W.V.; Investigation, T.D., J.S. and F.N.; Methodology, T.D., J.S. and F.N.; Project administration, M.W.V.; Supervision, E.P. and M.W.V.; Validation, M.W.V.; Visualization, J.S., F.N., E.P. and M.W.V.; Writing—original draft, T.D.; Writing—review and editing, T.D., E.P. and M.W.V. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by National Funds from FCT—Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia through projects UID/Multi/50016/2019 and PTDC/AGRPRO/3972/2014; and the Northern Operational Program-Norte2020: NORTE-08-5369-FSE-000007.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by National Funds from FCT—Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia through projects UID/Multi/50016/2019 and PTDC/AGRPRO/3972/2014); and by the European Social Fund through the Northern Operational Program-Norte2020 (NORTE-08-5369-FSE-000007).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Keeling, R.F.; Walker, S.J.; Piper, S.C.; Bollenbacher, A.F. Scripps UCSD Atmospheric CO2 Concentrations (ppm) Derived from in Situ Air Measurements at Mauna Loa, Observatory, Hawaii: Latitude 19.5°N Longitude 155.6°W Elevation 3397m. Available online: http://scrippsco2.ucsd.edu/assets/data/atmospheric/stations/in_situ_co2/monthly/monthly_in_situ_co2_mlo.csv (accessed on 23 August 2021).
  2. Franks, P.J. Tansley review Sensitivity of plants to changing atmospheric CO2 concentration: From the geological past to the next century. New Phytol. 2013, 197, 1077–1094. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Haque, M.S.; Karim, M.A.; Haque, M.M.; Hamid, A.; Nawata, E. Effect of elevated CO2 concentration on growth, chlorophyll content and yield of mungbean (Vigna radiata L. Wilczek) genotypes. Jpn. J. Trop. Agr. 2005, 49, 189–196. [Google Scholar]
  4. Högy, P.; Wieser, H.; Köhler, P.; Schwadorf, K.; Breuer, J.; Franzaring, J.; Muntifering, R.; Fangmeier, A. Effects of elevated CO2 on grain yield and quality of wheat: Results from a three-year FACE experiment. Plant Biol. 2009. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Chaturvedi, A.K.; Bahuguna, R.N.; Pal, M.; Shah, D.; Maurya, S.; Jagadish, K.S.V. Elevated CO2 and heat stress interactions affect grain yield, quality and mineral nutrient composition in rice under field conditions. Field Crop. Res. 2017, 206, 149–157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Rao, N.K.S.; Mamatha, H.; Laxman, R.H. Effect of elevated CO2 on growth and yield of French bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) genotypes. Legum. Res. Int. J. 2015, 38, 72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Singh, S.K.; Reddy, V.R.; Bell, R.W. Potassium starvation limits soybean growth more than the photosynthetic processes across CO2 levels. Front. Plant Sci. 2017, 8, 1–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  8. Bourgault, M.; Brand, J.; Tausz-Posch, S.; Armstrong, R.D.; O’Leary, G.L.; Fitzgerald, G.J.; Tausz, M. Yield, growth and grain nitrogen response to elevated CO2 in six lentil (Lens culinaris) cultivars grown under Free Air CO2 Enrichment (FACE) in a semi-arid environment. Eur. J. Agron. 2017, 87, 50–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Soares, J.C.; Santos, C.S.; Carvalho, S.M.P.; Pintado, M.M.; Vasconcelos, M.W. Preserving the nutritional quality of crop plants under a changing climate: Importance and strategies. Plant Soil 2019, 443, 1–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Taub, D.R.; Miller, B.; Allen, H. Effects of elevated CO2 on the protein concentration of food crops: A meta-analysis. Glob. Chang. Biol. 2008, 14, 565–575. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Jablonski, L.M.; Wang, X.; Curtis, P.S. Plant reproduction under elevated CO2 conditions: A meta-analysis of reports on 79 crop and wild species. New Phytol. 2002, 156, 9–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Medek, D.E.; Schwartz, J.; Myers, S.S. Estimated effects of future atmospheric CO2 concentrations on protein intake and the risk of protein deficiency by country and region. Environ. Health Perspect. 2017, 125, 087002. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Loladze, I. Hidden shift of the ionome of plants exposed to elevated CO2 depletes minerals at the base of human nutrition. eLife 2014, 3, e02245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Loladze, I. Rising atmospheric CO2 and human nutrition: Toward globally imbalanced plant stoichiometry? Trends Ecol. Evol. 2002, 17, 457–461. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Leakey, A.D.B.; Ainsworth, E.A.; Bernacchi, C.J.; Rogers, A.; Long, S.P.; Ort, D.R. Elevated CO2 effects on plant carbon, nitrogen, and water relations: Six important lessons from FACE. J. Exp. Bot. 2009, 60, 2859–2876. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Ainsworth, E.A.; Rogers, A. The response of photosynthesis and stomatal conductance to rising [CO2]: Mechanisms and environmental interactions. Plant Cell Environ. 2007, 30, 258–270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. He, J.; Zhang, R.X.; Peng, K.; Tagliavia, C.; Li, S.; Xue, S.; Liu, A.; Hu, H.; Zhang, J.; Hubbard, K.E.; et al. The BIG protein distinguishes the process of CO2-induced stomatal closure from the inhibition of stomatal opening by CO2. New Phytol. 2018, 218, 232–241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  18. Jauregui, I.; Aparicio-Tejo, P.M.; Avila, C.; Cañas, R.; Sakalauskiene, S.; Aranjuelo, I. Root-shoot interactions explain the reduction of leaf mineral content in Arabidopsis plants grown under elevated [CO2] conditions. Physiol. Plant. 2016, 65–79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Jauregui, I.; Aparicio-Tejo, P.M.; Avila, C.; Rueda-López, M.; Aranjuelo, I. Root and shoot performance of Arabidopsis thaliana exposed to elevated CO2: A physiologic, metabolic and transcriptomic response. J. Plant Physiol. 2015, 189, 65–76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Noguchi, K.; Watanabe, C.K.; Terashima, I. Effects of elevated atmospheric CO2 on primary metabolite levels in Arabidopsis thaliana Col-0 leaves: An examination of metabolome data. Plant Cell Physiol. 2015, 56, 2069–2078. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Vasconcelos, M.W.; Clemente, T.E.; Grusak, M.A. Evaluation of constitutive iron reductase (AtFRO2) expression on mineral accumulation and distribution in soybean (Glycine max. L.). Front. Plant Sci. 2014, 5, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  22. Covarrubias, J.I.; Rombolà, A.D. Physiological and biochemical responses of the iron chlorosis tolerant grapevine rootstock 140 Ruggeri to iron deficiency and bicarbonate. Plant Soil 2013, 370, 305–315. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Abadía, J.; López-Millán, A.-F.; Rombolà, A.; Abadía, A. Organic acids and Fe deficiency: A review. Plant Soil 2002, 241, 75–86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Houshmandfar, A.; Fitzgerald, G.J.; O’Leary, G.; Tausz-Posch, S.; Fletcher, A.; Tausz, M. The relationship between transpiration and nutrient uptake in wheat changes under elevated atmospheric CO2. Physiol. Plant. 2018, 163, 516–529. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  25. Houshmandfar, A.; Fitzgerald, G.J.; Tausz, M. Elevated CO2 decreases both transpiration flow and concentrations of Ca and Mg in the xylem sap of wheat. J. Plant Physiol. 2015, 174, 157–160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Li, W.; Lan, P. The understanding of the plant iron deficiency responses in strategy I plants and the role of ethylene in this process by omic approaches. Front. Plant Sci. 2017, 8, 1–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  27. Castro-Guerrero, N.A.; Isidra-Arellano, M.C.; Mendoza-Cozatl, D.G.; González-Guerrero, M.; Grusak, M.A.; Valdés-López, O. Common bean: A legume model on the rise for unraveling responses and adaptations to iron, zinc, and phosphate deficiencies. Front. Plant Sci. 2016, 7, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  28. Pedrosa-Harand, A.; Almeida, C.C.S.; Mosiolek, M.; Blair, M.W.; Schweizer, D.; Guerra, M. Extensive ribosomal DNA amplification during Andean common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) evolution. Theor. Appl. Genet. 2006, 112, 924–933. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Hartman, G.L.; West, E.D.; Herman, T.K. Crops that feed the World 2. Soybean-worldwide production, use, and constraints caused by pathogens and pests. Food Secur. 2011, 3, 5–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Myers, S.S.; Zanobetti, A.; Kloog, I.; Huybers, P.; Leakey, A.D.B.; Bloom, A.J.; Carlisle, E.; Dietterich, L.H.; Fitzgerald, G.; Hasegawa, T.; et al. Increasing CO2 threatens human nutrition. Nature 2014, 510, 139–142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Cotrufo, F.M.; Ineson, P.; Scott, A. Elevated CO2 reduces the nitrogen concentration of plant. Glob. Chang. Biol. 1998, 4, 43–54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Feng, Z.; Rütting, T.; Pleijel, H.; Wallin, G.; Reich, P.B.; Kammann, C.I.; Newton, P.C.D.; Kobayashi, K.; Luo, Y.; Uddling, J. Constraints to nitrogen acquisition of terrestrial plants under elevated CO2. Glob. Chang. Biol. 2015, 21, 3152–3168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Ruiz-Vera, U.M.; De Souza, A.P.; Long, S.P.; Ort, D.R. The role of sink strength and nitrogen availability in the down-regulation of photosynthetic capacity in field-grown Nicotiana tabacum L. at elevated CO2 concentration. Front. Plant Sci. 2017, 8, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Tausz, M.; Bilela, S.; Bahrami, H.; Armstrong, R.; Fitzgerald, G.; O’Leary, G.; Simon, J.; Tausz-Posch, S.; Rennenberg, H. Nitrogen nutrition and aspects of root growth and function of two wheat cultivars under elevated [CO2]. Environ. Exp. Bot. 2017, 140, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Dong, J.; Xu, Q.; Gruda, N.; Chu, W.; Li, X.; Duan, Z. Elevated and super-elevated CO2 differ in their interactive effects with nitrogen availability on fruit yield and quality of cucumber. J. Sci. Food Agric. 2018, 98, 4509–4516. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Fangmeier, A.; De Temmerman, L.; Mortensen, L.; Kemp, K.; Burke, J.; Mitchell, R.; Van Oijen, M.; Weigel, H.J. Effects on nutrients and on grain quality in spring wheat crops grown under elevated CO2 concentrations and stress conditions in the European, multiple-site experiment “ESPACE-wheat”. Eur. J. Agron. 1999, 10, 215–229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Ma, Z.; Flynn, J.; Libra, G.; Shi, Z. Elevated CO2 accelerates phosphorus depletion by common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris) in association with altered leaf biochemical properties. Pedosphere 2018, 28, 422–429. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Jin, J.; Tang, C.; Sale, P. The impact of elevated carbon dioxide on the phosphorus nutrition of plants: A review. Ann. Bot. 2015, 116, 987–999. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  39. Jakobsen, I.; Smith, S.E.; Smith, F.A.; Watts-Williams, S.J.; Clausen, S.S.; Grønlund, M. Plant growth responses to elevated atmospheric CO2 are increased by phosphorus sufficiency but not by arbuscular mycorrhizas. J. Exp. Bot. 2016, 67, 6173–6186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  40. Pandey, R.; Zinta, G.; AbdElgawad, H.; Ahmad, A.; Jain, V.; Janssens, I.A. Physiological and molecular alterations in plants exposed to high [CO2] under phosphorus stress. Biotechnol. Adv. 2015, 33, 303–316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  41. Yilmaz, O.; Kahraman, K.; Ozturk, L. Elevated carbon dioxide exacerbates adverse effects of Mg deficiency in durum wheat. Plant Soil 2017, 410, 41–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Niu, Y.; Ahammed, G.J.; Tang, C.; Guo, L.; Yu, J. Physiological and transcriptome responses to combinations of elevated CO2 and magnesium in Arabidopsis thaliana. PLoS ONE 2016, 11, 1–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  43. Reddy, K.R.; Zhao, D. Interactive effects of elevated CO2 and potassium deficiency on photosynthesis, growth, and biomass partitioning of cotton. F. Crop. Res. 2005, 94, 201–213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Jin, C.W.; Du, S.T.; Chen, W.W.; Li, G.X.; Zhang, Y.S.; Zheng, S.J. Elevated carbon dioxide improves plant iron nutrition through enhancing the iron-deficiency-induced responses under iron-limited conditions in tomato. Plant Physiol. 2009, 150, 272–280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  45. Schmidt, W. Mechanisms and regulation of reduction-based iron uptake in plants. New Phytol. 1999, 141, 1–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Heinemann, A.B.; de H.N. Maia, A.; Dourado-neto, D.; Ingram, K.T.; Hoogenboom, G. Soybean (Glycine max (L.) Merr.) growth and development response to CO2 enrichment under different temperature regimes. Eur. J. Agron. 2006, 24, 52–61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Rogers, H.H.; Peterson, C.M.; McCrimmon, J.M.; Cure, J.D. Response of soybean roots to elevated atmospheric carbon dioxide. Plant Cell Environ. 1992, 15, 749–752. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Bunce, J.A. Contrasting responses of seed yield to elevated carbon dioxide under field conditions within Phaseolus vulgaris. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 2008, 128, 219–224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Salsman, K.J.; Jordan, D.N.; Smith, S.D.; Neuman, D.S. Effect of atmospheric CO2 enrichment on root growth and carbohydrate alloca- tion of Phaseolus spp. Int. J. Plant Sci. 1999, 160, 1075–1081. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Makino, A.; Mae, T. Photosynthesis and plant growth at elevated levels of CO2. Plant Cell Physiol. 1999, 40, 999–1006. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Kumar, U.; Quick, W.P.; Barrios, M.; Sta Cruz, P.C.; Dingkuhn, M.; Hunsaker, D.; Adamsen, F.; Lamorte, R.; Leavitt, S.; Thompson, T.; et al. Atmospheric CO2 concentration effects on rice water use and biomass production. PLoS ONE 2017, 12, e0169706. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  52. Pritchard, S.G.; Rogers, H.H.; Prior, S.A.; Peterson, C.M. Elevated CO2 and plant structure: A review. Glob. Chang. Biol. 1999, 5, 807–837. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  53. Kant, S.; Seneweera, S.; Rodin, J.; Materne, M.; Burch, D.; Rothstein, S.J.; Spangenberg, G. Improving yield potential in crops under elevated CO2: Integrating the photosynthetic and nitrogen utilization efficiencies. Front. Plant Sci. 2012, 3, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  54. Balk, J.; Schaedler, T.A. Iron cofactor assembly in plants. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 2014, 65, 125–153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Abadía, J.; Vázquez, S.; Rellán-Álvarez, R.; El-Jendoubi, H.; Abadía, A.; Álvarez-Fernández, A.; López-Millán, A.F. Towards a knowledge-based correction of iron chlorosis. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2011, 49, 471–482. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Abadìa, J. Leaf responses to Fe deficiency: A review. J. Plant Nutr. 1992, 15, 1699–1713. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  57. Teng, N.; Wang, J.; Chen, T.; Wu, X.; Wang, Y.; Lin, J. Elevated CO2 induces physiological, biochemical and structural changes in leaves of Arabidopsis thaliana. New Phytol. 2006, 172, 92–103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Faralli, M.; Grove, I.G.; Hare, M.C.; Kettlewell, P.S.; Fiorani, F. Rising CO2 from historical concentrations enhances the physiological performance of Brassica napus seedlings under optimal water supply but not under reduced water availability. Plant Cell Environ. 2017, 40, 317–325. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  59. Xu, Z.; Jiang, Y.; Jia, B.; Zhou, G. Elevated-CO2 response of stomata and its dependence on environmental factors. Front. Plant Sci. 2016, 7, 1–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  60. Kimball, B.A. Crop responses to elevated CO2 and interactions with H2O, N., and temperature. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 2016, 31, 36–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Lambreva, M.; Stoyanova-Koleva, D.; Baldjiev, G.; Tsonev, T. Early acclimation changes in the photosynthetic apparatus of bean plants during short-term exposure to elevated CO2 concentration under high temperature and light intensity. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 2005, 106, 219–232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Ruiz-Vera, U.M.; De Souza, A.P.; Ament, M.R.; Gleadow, R.M.; Ort, D.R. High sink strength prevents photosynthetic down-regulation in cassava grown at elevated CO2 concentration. J. Exp. Bot. 2021, 72, 542–560. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Morrissey, J.; Guerinot, M. Lou Iron uptake and transport in plants: The good, the bad, and the ionome. Chem. Rev. 2009, 109, 4553–4567. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  64. Krouma, A.; Gharsalli, M.; Abdelly, C. Differences in response to iron deficiency among some lines of common bean. J. Plant Nutr. 2003, 26, 2295–2305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Slatni, T.; Krouma, A.; Gouia, H.; Abdelly, C. Importance of ferric chelate reductase activity and acidification capacity in root nodules of N2-fixing common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) subjected to iron deficiency. Symbiosis 2009, 47, 35–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Slatni, T.; Ben Salah, I.; Kouas, S.; Abdelly, C. The role of nodules in the tolerance of common bean to iron deficiency. J. Plant Res. 2014, 127, 455–465. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  67. Blair, M.W.; Knewtson, S.J.B.J.J.B.; Astudillo, C.; Li, C.-M.M.; Fernandez, A.C.; Grusak, M.A. Variation and inheritance of iron reductase activity in the roots of common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) and association with seed iron accumulation QTL. BMC Plant Biol. 2010, 10, 215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  68. Hsieh, E.J.; Waters, B.M. Alkaline stress and iron deficiency regulate iron uptake and riboflavin synthesis gene expression differently in root and leaf tissue: Implications for iron deficiency chlorosis. J. Exp. Bot. 2016, 67, 5671–5685. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. López-Millán, A.F.; Morales, F.; Gogorcena, Y.; Abadía, A.; Abadía, J. Metabolic responses in iron deficient tomato plants. J. Plant Physiol. 2009, 166, 375–384. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  70. Zanin, L.; Tomasi, N.; Rizzardo, C.; Gottardi, S.; Terzano, R.; Alfeld, M.; Janssens, K.; De Nobili, M.; Mimmo, T.; Cesco, S. Iron allocation in leaves of Fe-deficient cucumber plants fed with natural Fe complexes. Physiol. Plant. 2015, 154, 82–94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Yi, Y.; Guerinot, M.L. Genetic evidence that induction of root Fe (III) chelate reductase activity is necessary for iron uptake under iron deficiency. Plant, J. 1996, 10, 835–844. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Santos, C.S.; Roriz, M.; Carvalho, S.M.P.; Vasconcelos, M.W. Iron partitioning at an early growth stage impacts iron deficiency responses in soybean plants (Glycine max L.). Front. Plant Sci. 2015, 6, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  73. Santos, C.S.; Silva, A.I.; Serrão, I.; Carvalho, A.L.; Vasconcelos, M.W. Transcriptomic analysis of iron deficiency related genes in the legumes. Food Res. Int. 2013, 54, 1162–1171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Gama, F.; Saavedra, T.; da Silva, J.P.; Miguel, M.G.; de Varennes, A.; Correia, P.J.; Pestana, M. The memory of iron stress in strawberry plants. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2016, 104, 36–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  75. Aranjuelo, I.; Sanz-sáez, Á.; Jáuregui, I.; Irigoyen, J.J.; Araus, J.L.; Sánchez-díaz, M. Harvest index, a parameter conditioning responsiveness of wheat plants to elevated CO2. J. Exp. Bot. 2013, 64, 1879–1892. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  76. Correia, P.J.; Gama, F.; Saavedra, T.; Miguel, M.G.; Da Silva, J.P.; Abadía, A.; de Varennes, A.; Pestana, M. Changes in the concentration of organic acids in roots and leaves of carob-tree under Fe deficiency. Funct. Plant Biology 2014, 41, 496–504. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  77. Covarrubias, J.I.; Rombolà, A.D. Organic acids metabolism in roots of grapevine rootstocks under severe iron deficiency. Plant Soil 2015, 165–175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Bencke-Malato, M.; De Souza, A.P.; Ribeiro-Alves, M.; Schmitz, J.F.; Buckeridge, M.S.; Alves-Ferreira, M. Short-term responses of soybean roots to individual and combinatorial effects of elevated [CO2] and water deficit. Plant Sci. 2019, 280, 283–296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Environments 08 00122 g001 550
Figure 1. Trifoliate (a,e), stem+unifoliate (b,f), root (c,g) and root:shoot ratio (d,h) of soybean and common bean plants grown at 400 ppm and 800 ppm CO2 and with 0 (−Fe) and 20 μM Fe-EDDHA (+Fe). The results represent the mean of five biological replicates ± SE. Different letters above bars indicate significant differences p < 0.05 using the Tukey test.
Figure 1. Trifoliate (a,e), stem+unifoliate (b,f), root (c,g) and root:shoot ratio (d,h) of soybean and common bean plants grown at 400 ppm and 800 ppm CO2 and with 0 (−Fe) and 20 μM Fe-EDDHA (+Fe). The results represent the mean of five biological replicates ± SE. Different letters above bars indicate significant differences p < 0.05 using the Tukey test.
Environments 08 00122 g001
Environments 08 00122 g002 550
Figure 2. SPAD values (a,d), photosynthetic rate (b,e) and ferric chelate reductase activity (c,f), of soybean and common bean plants grown at 400 ppm and 800 ppm CO2 and with 0 (−Fe) and 20 μM Fe-EDDHA (+Fe). The results represent the mean of five biological replicates ± SE. Different letters above bars indicate significant differences p < 0.05 using the Tukey test.
Figure 2. SPAD values (a,d), photosynthetic rate (b,e) and ferric chelate reductase activity (c,f), of soybean and common bean plants grown at 400 ppm and 800 ppm CO2 and with 0 (−Fe) and 20 μM Fe-EDDHA (+Fe). The results represent the mean of five biological replicates ± SE. Different letters above bars indicate significant differences p < 0.05 using the Tukey test.
Environments 08 00122 g002
Environments 08 00122 g003 550
Figure 3. Concentrations of citric (a,c) and malic (b,d) acids in the leaves and roots of soybean and common bean plants grown at 400 ppm and 800 ppm CO2 and with 0 (−Fe) and 20 μM Fe-EDDHA (+Fe). The results represent the mean of five biological replicates ± SE. Different letters above bars indicate significant differences p < 0.05 using the Tukey test.
Figure 3. Concentrations of citric (a,c) and malic (b,d) acids in the leaves and roots of soybean and common bean plants grown at 400 ppm and 800 ppm CO2 and with 0 (−Fe) and 20 μM Fe-EDDHA (+Fe). The results represent the mean of five biological replicates ± SE. Different letters above bars indicate significant differences p < 0.05 using the Tukey test.
Environments 08 00122 g003
Environments 08 00122 g004 550
Figure 4. Concentrations of iron (Fe), zinc (Zn), magnesium (Mg), manganese (Mn), potassium (K) and phosphorous (P) in the leaves and roots of soybean (left panel) and common bean plants (right panel) grown at 400 ppm or 800 ppm CO2, under iron sufficiency, with iron at 20 μM Fe-EDDHA (+Fe), and iron deficiency without Fe (−Fe). The results represent the mean of five biological replicates ± SE. Different letters above bars indicate significant differences p < 0.05 using the Tukey test.
Figure 4. Concentrations of iron (Fe), zinc (Zn), magnesium (Mg), manganese (Mn), potassium (K) and phosphorous (P) in the leaves and roots of soybean (left panel) and common bean plants (right panel) grown at 400 ppm or 800 ppm CO2, under iron sufficiency, with iron at 20 μM Fe-EDDHA (+Fe), and iron deficiency without Fe (−Fe). The results represent the mean of five biological replicates ± SE. Different letters above bars indicate significant differences p < 0.05 using the Tukey test.
Environments 08 00122 g004
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Deuchande, T.; Soares, J.; Nunes, F.; Pinto, E.; Vasconcelos, M.W. Short Term Elevated CO2 Interacts with Iron Deficiency, Further Repressing Growth, Photosynthesis and Mineral Accumulation in Soybean (Glycine max L.) and Common Bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.). Environments 2021, 8, 122. https://doi.org/10.3390/environments8110122

AMA Style

Deuchande T, Soares J, Nunes F, Pinto E, Vasconcelos MW. Short Term Elevated CO2 Interacts with Iron Deficiency, Further Repressing Growth, Photosynthesis and Mineral Accumulation in Soybean (Glycine max L.) and Common Bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.). Environments. 2021; 8(11):122. https://doi.org/10.3390/environments8110122

Chicago/Turabian Style

Deuchande, Teresa, José Soares, Fábio Nunes, Elisabete Pinto, and Marta W. Vasconcelos. 2021. "Short Term Elevated CO2 Interacts with Iron Deficiency, Further Repressing Growth, Photosynthesis and Mineral Accumulation in Soybean (Glycine max L.) and Common Bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.)" Environments 8, no. 11: 122. https://doi.org/10.3390/environments8110122

APA Style

Deuchande, T., Soares, J., Nunes, F., Pinto, E., & Vasconcelos, M. W. (2021). Short Term Elevated CO2 Interacts with Iron Deficiency, Further Repressing Growth, Photosynthesis and Mineral Accumulation in Soybean (Glycine max L.) and Common Bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.). Environments, 8(11), 122. https://doi.org/10.3390/environments8110122

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop