Next Article in Journal
Potential of Urban Densification to Mitigate the Effects of Heat Island in Vienna, Austria
Next Article in Special Issue
Walking in Each Other’s Footsteps: Do Animal Trail Makers Confer Resilience against Trampling Tourists?
Previous Article in Journal
Cyclospora Cayetanensis Presence in the Environment—A Case Study in the Chicago Metropolitan Area
Previous Article in Special Issue
Adventure Races in Brazil: Do Stakeholders Take Conservation into Consideration?

Recreational Ecology: A Review of Research and Gap Analysis

School of Veterinary and Life Science, Murdoch University, 90 South Street, Murdoch, Perth, WA 6150, Australia
Australian Centre for Culture, Environment, Society and Space, School of Geography and Sustainable Communities, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, NSW 2522, Australia
Centre for Ecosystem Science, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW 2052, Australia
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Environments 2019, 6(7), 81;
Received: 17 June 2019 / Accepted: 5 July 2019 / Published: 8 July 2019
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Environmental Impact of Nature-Based Tourism)
Recreational ecology is an internationally evolving research field addressing the high demand for nature-based tourism and recreation, and its environmental impacts. This review aimed to analyze the research effort of recreational ecology studies published in four renowned journals in the field, the Journal of Sustainable Tourism, Tourism Management, the Journal of Environmental Management, and Environmental Management. Between 1976 and 2017, this review identified 145 papers focused on recreational ecology. The majority of research investigated the direct impacts of terrestrial activities in protected areas, in particular the impacts of walking and hiking on vegetation and trail conditions, and the impacts of wildlife viewing. A conceptual model was developed to describe the varied relationships between nature-based tourists and recreationists and the environment. Future research in recreational ecology should broaden its agenda to increase knowledge on indirect and long-term impacts; including on cryptic or less popular species; establish more specifically how the intensity of impacts depends on the amount of use other than in trampling studies; extend to other geographic areas such as developing countries, and nature-based spaces that are less protected and exposed to high visitation such as urban environments. Importantly, a much stronger focus needs to be on interdisciplinary approaches incorporating both environmental and social science techniques to determine ways of how visitor experiential needs can be reconciled with environmental conservation concerns in a rapidly increasing tourism and recreation economy. View Full-Text
Keywords: nature-based tourism; recreation; environmental impacts; systematic quantitative review; protected areas nature-based tourism; recreation; environmental impacts; systematic quantitative review; protected areas
Show Figures

Figure 1

MDPI and ACS Style

Sumanapala, D.; Wolf, I.D. Recreational Ecology: A Review of Research and Gap Analysis. Environments 2019, 6, 81.

AMA Style

Sumanapala D, Wolf ID. Recreational Ecology: A Review of Research and Gap Analysis. Environments. 2019; 6(7):81.

Chicago/Turabian Style

Sumanapala, Daminda, and Isabelle D. Wolf. 2019. "Recreational Ecology: A Review of Research and Gap Analysis" Environments 6, no. 7: 81.

Find Other Styles
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

Back to TopTop