Next Article in Journal
Examining the Effects of Environmental Knowledge and Health Insurance Coverage on Health Status
Next Article in Special Issue
Experimental Study of Grain Dryer Noise Emissions
Previous Article in Journal
Sustainable Co-Management of Acid Mine Drainage with Struvite Synthesis Effluent: Pragmatic Synergies in Circular Economy
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Definition of Key Performance Indicators for Noise Monitoring Networks

1
Environmental Protection Agency of Tuscany Region (ARPAT), Pisa Department, Via Vittorio Veneto 27, 56127 Pisa, Italy
2
iPOOL S.r.l., Via Cocchi 7, 56121 Pisa, Italy
3
Institute of Chemical and Physical Processes of National Research Council, Via G. Moruzzi 1, 56124 Pisa, Italy
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Environments 2023, 10(4), 61; https://doi.org/10.3390/environments10040061
Submission received: 26 January 2023 / Revised: 20 March 2023 / Accepted: 31 March 2023 / Published: 4 April 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue New Solutions Mitigating Environmental Noise Pollution II)

Abstract

The European Noise Directive fixed a well-defined schedule on a five-year basis for the noise exposure evaluation of citizens. Noise monitoring is needed to validate noise maps of the main transportation infrastructures and it can also represent an improvement. By comparing with average noise maps, a properly set sensor network can report noise information in a more case-specific way, including time variations. To the best of the authors’ knowledge, key performance indicators (KPIs) evaluating the technical performance and financial sustainability of acoustic networks have never been presented in the scientific literature. Therefore, in the present work, a set of KPIs are proposed on the basis of KPIs defined for monitoring networks of other pollutants. It is then tuned according to noise monitoring, in line with the current legislations. As a case study, the performance of three monitoring networks installed in ports are evaluated and discussed. The resulting investment and maintenance costs can be helpful for decision makers to calculate the cost–benefits in the installation of new monitoring stations and also to evaluate the performance of the already-existing ones.
Keywords: KPI (key performance indicator); port noise; environmental noise; noise monitoring airport noise; autonomous noise measurements; financial sustainability; environmental noise directive; acoustic monitoring networks KPI (key performance indicator); port noise; environmental noise; noise monitoring airport noise; autonomous noise measurements; financial sustainability; environmental noise directive; acoustic monitoring networks

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Bolognese, M.; Carpita, S.; Fredianelli, L.; Licitra, G. Definition of Key Performance Indicators for Noise Monitoring Networks. Environments 2023, 10, 61. https://doi.org/10.3390/environments10040061

AMA Style

Bolognese M, Carpita S, Fredianelli L, Licitra G. Definition of Key Performance Indicators for Noise Monitoring Networks. Environments. 2023; 10(4):61. https://doi.org/10.3390/environments10040061

Chicago/Turabian Style

Bolognese, Matteo, Stefano Carpita, Luca Fredianelli, and Gaetano Licitra. 2023. "Definition of Key Performance Indicators for Noise Monitoring Networks" Environments 10, no. 4: 61. https://doi.org/10.3390/environments10040061

APA Style

Bolognese, M., Carpita, S., Fredianelli, L., & Licitra, G. (2023). Definition of Key Performance Indicators for Noise Monitoring Networks. Environments, 10(4), 61. https://doi.org/10.3390/environments10040061

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop