Next Article in Journal
From Individual Expression to Group Polarization: A Study on Twitter’s Emotional Diffusion Patterns in the German Election
Next Article in Special Issue
Older Adults’ Experiences of Telephone-Delivered Behavioral Activation with Mental Imagery as a Treatment for Depression During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Qualitative Study
Previous Article in Journal
Exploring the Social Validity and Diffusion Potential of Common Naturalistic Developmental Behavioral Intervention Strategies Implemented in Community Preschools
Previous Article in Special Issue
The Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on the Development of Motor Skills of German 5- to 6-Year-Old Children
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Workers’ Psychological Distress During the Early Months of the COVID-19 Pandemic in Brazil: A Cross-Sectional Study

by
Melissa Spröesser Alonso
1,
Maria Cristina Pereira Lima
1,2,
Adriano Dias
1,3,
Hélio Rubens de Carvalho Nunes
1,4,
Carlos Ruiz-Frutos
5,6,
Javier Fagundo-Rivera
7,
Juan Gómez-Salgado
5,6,* and
João Marcos Bernardes
1,3
1
Graduate Program in Collective/Public Health, Botucatu Medical School, São Paulo State University (UNESP), Botucatu 18618687, São Paulo, Brazil
2
Department of Neurosciences and Mental Health, Botucatu Medical School, São Paulo State University (UNESP), Botucatu 18618687, São Paulo, Brazil
3
Department of Public Health, Botucatu Medical School, São Paulo State University (UNESP), Botucatu 18618687, São Paulo, Brazil
4
Graduate Program in Nursing Academic Master’s and Doctoral Programs, Botucatu Medical School, São Paulo State University (UNESP), Botucatu 18618687, São Paulo, Brazil
5
Department of Sociology, Social Work and Public Health, Faculty of Labour Sciences, University of Huelva, 21007 Huelva, Spain
6
Safety and Health Postgraduate Programme, Universidad Espíritu Santo, Guayaquil 092301, Ecuador
7
Centro Universitario de Enfermería Cruz Roja, University of Seville, 41009 Sevilla, Spain
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Behav. Sci. 2025, 15(3), 358; https://doi.org/10.3390/bs15030358
Submission received: 27 January 2025 / Revised: 5 March 2025 / Accepted: 12 March 2025 / Published: 13 March 2025
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Health Psychology and Behaviors during COVID-19)

Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic significantly impacted the mental health of workers. This study aimed to assess the prevalence of psychological distress among Brazilian workers during the early months of the pandemic and explore its associated factors. A cross-sectional study was conducted using an online questionnaire administered to 2903 Brazilian workers, including 1752 non-healthcare workers (NHCWs) and 1151 healthcare workers (HCWs), between April and May 2020. Snowball sampling was employed for participant recruitment, and the research questionnaire was adapted for use with the Brazilian population through a process of translation and cultural adaptation, based on an instrument initially created and validated for use in Spain. Differences between NHCWs and HCWs were tested using the chi-square or Fisher’s Exact test and Mann–Whitney test followed by effect size measurement. Multiple linear regression models were used to analyze the association between psychological distress and the predictor variables. Psychological distress was observed in 72.6% (95% CI 70.1–74.2%) of the participants, with no significant difference observed between NHCWs and HCWs. Although 32 variables showed statistically significant differences between NHCWs and HCWs, only 7 demonstrated clinical–epidemiological relevance, primarily related to occupational factors. Work-related stress was positively associated with psychological distress, but this relationship diminished in the absence of family members infected with COVID-19. Conversely, a higher sense of coherence was protective against psychological distress, although this effect weakened in the absence of family members infected with COVID-19. The study highlights the high prevalence of psychological distress among Brazilian workers during the pandemic’s early months. Work stress played a significant role, while sense of coherence appeared to mitigate mental health challenges. These findings highlight the need for targeted mental health interventions, particularly for workers facing both professional and family-related stressors during crises.
Keywords: COVID-19; preventive medicine; psychological distress; epidemiology; mental health; socioeconomic aspects of health COVID-19; preventive medicine; psychological distress; epidemiology; mental health; socioeconomic aspects of health

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Alonso, M.S.; Lima, M.C.P.; Dias, A.; Nunes, H.R.d.C.; Ruiz-Frutos, C.; Fagundo-Rivera, J.; Gómez-Salgado, J.; Bernardes, J.M. Workers’ Psychological Distress During the Early Months of the COVID-19 Pandemic in Brazil: A Cross-Sectional Study. Behav. Sci. 2025, 15, 358. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs15030358

AMA Style

Alonso MS, Lima MCP, Dias A, Nunes HRdC, Ruiz-Frutos C, Fagundo-Rivera J, Gómez-Salgado J, Bernardes JM. Workers’ Psychological Distress During the Early Months of the COVID-19 Pandemic in Brazil: A Cross-Sectional Study. Behavioral Sciences. 2025; 15(3):358. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs15030358

Chicago/Turabian Style

Alonso, Melissa Spröesser, Maria Cristina Pereira Lima, Adriano Dias, Hélio Rubens de Carvalho Nunes, Carlos Ruiz-Frutos, Javier Fagundo-Rivera, Juan Gómez-Salgado, and João Marcos Bernardes. 2025. "Workers’ Psychological Distress During the Early Months of the COVID-19 Pandemic in Brazil: A Cross-Sectional Study" Behavioral Sciences 15, no. 3: 358. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs15030358

APA Style

Alonso, M. S., Lima, M. C. P., Dias, A., Nunes, H. R. d. C., Ruiz-Frutos, C., Fagundo-Rivera, J., Gómez-Salgado, J., & Bernardes, J. M. (2025). Workers’ Psychological Distress During the Early Months of the COVID-19 Pandemic in Brazil: A Cross-Sectional Study. Behavioral Sciences, 15(3), 358. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs15030358

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop