Next Article in Journal / Special Issue
Learning Styles Determine Different Immigrant Students’ Results in Testing Settings: Relationship Between Nationality of Children and the Stimuli of Tasks
Previous Article in Journal
The Role of Parental Communication and Emotional Intelligence in Child-to-Parent Violence
Previous Article in Special Issue
Digital Storytelling in Language Education
Open AccessArticle

To Use or Not to Use: No Consensus on Whether and How to Apply Genetic Information in the Justice System

Department of Psychology, Goldsmiths, University of London, London SE14 6NW, UK
International Centre for Research in Human Development, Tomsk State University, Tomsk 634050, Russia
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Behav. Sci. 2019, 9(12), 149;
Received: 16 October 2019 / Revised: 4 December 2019 / Accepted: 6 December 2019 / Published: 10 December 2019
(This article belongs to the Special Issue XVI European Congress of Psychology)
Little is known about the public’s attitudes towards applying genetic information in the justice system. This study aimed to extend previous research to explore this among the general public and those with training in law. Data were collected from over 10,000 participants, including 486 lawyers and law students. We analysed eight available relevant items from the International Genetic Literacy and Attitudes Survey (iGLAS). The majority of participants viewed genetic information as relevant to justice. For example, 65% believed that we should make provisions (legal and policy) to buffer the effects of genetic disadvantage on individuals, and almost 60% believed that genetic information should be taken into account in sentencing. At the same time, many participants (70%) disagreed that genetic influences on behaviour negate free will. The results of the correlational analyses suggest that people who consider genetic information relevant in one context tend to consider it relevant across all aspects of the justice system, including in sentencing, crime prevention and access to justice. Overall, the results suggest that views on the use of genetics by justice systems are complex and widely varied. Further research is needed to understand these complex views. View Full-Text
Keywords: genetic information; justice system; sentencing; free will genetic information; justice system; sentencing; free will
MDPI and ACS Style

Selita, F.; Chapman, R.; Kovas, Y. To Use or Not to Use: No Consensus on Whether and How to Apply Genetic Information in the Justice System. Behav. Sci. 2019, 9, 149.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

Back to TopTop