Next Article in Journal
‘Perceptions of Performance Appraisal Quality’ and Employee Innovative Behavior: Do Psychological Empowerment and ‘Perceptions of HRM System Strength’ Matter?
Previous Article in Journal
A Critical Exploration of Child-Parent Attachment as a Contextual Construct
Article Menu

Export Article

Open AccessArticle
Behav. Sci. 2018, 8(12), 113; https://doi.org/10.3390/bs8120113

University–Community Partnerships Using a Participatory Action Research Model to Evaluate the Impact of Dance for Health

1
School of Nursing, Rutgers the State University of New Jersey, Camden, NJ 08102, USA
2
School of Nursing, The University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
3
Netter Center for Community Partnerships, The University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
4
Perelman School of Medicine, The University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Received: 5 November 2018 / Revised: 5 December 2018 / Accepted: 9 December 2018 / Published: 14 December 2018
Full-Text   |   PDF [251 KB, uploaded 14 December 2018]

Abstract

Little is known about fostering sustainable, collaborative community-academic partnerships that effectively improve physical activity and health in residents of under resourced communities using Participatory Action Research (PAR) driven models. The purpose of this PAR study was to evaluate the impact of an urban, intergenerational, and physical activity dance program by identifying community preferred measurable outcomes that promote program participation and sustainability. A descriptive, qualitative design was employed using semi-structured interview guides to facilitate discussions for two adult focus groups and one youth focus group. Exactly 19 community-residing adults and six youth who lived in urban neighborhoods in West Philadelphia participated in the discussions. The audiotapes were transcribed and analyzed using directed content analysis. Five outcome themes emerged and included: (1). Enhancing the psychological and emotional well-being of the individual, (2). Enhancement of social well-being and management of interpersonal relationships and responsibilities (3). Enhancing and promoting physiologic well-being (4). Changes in health promoting behaviors and skill acquisition, and (5). Concerns about accessibility of dance for health and other physical activity programs in the community. Focused attention to measuring community preferred outcomes can promote sustainability of Dance for Health and possibly other urban-based physical activity dance programs. View Full-Text
Keywords: physical activity; participatory action research; academic community partnerships; health behavior disparities; outcomes evaluation; qualitative research; content analysis physical activity; participatory action research; academic community partnerships; health behavior disparities; outcomes evaluation; qualitative research; content analysis
This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited (CC BY 4.0).
SciFeed

Share & Cite This Article

MDPI and ACS Style

Atkins, R.; Deatrick, J.A.; Bowman, C.; Bolick, A.; McCurry, I.; Lipman, T.H. University–Community Partnerships Using a Participatory Action Research Model to Evaluate the Impact of Dance for Health. Behav. Sci. 2018, 8, 113.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats

Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Related Articles

Article Metrics

Article Access Statistics

1

Comments

[Return to top]
Behav. Sci. EISSN 2076-328X Published by MDPI AG, Basel, Switzerland RSS E-Mail Table of Contents Alert
Back to Top