Next Article in Journal / Special Issue
Still Searching: A Meta-Synthesis of a Good Death from the Bereaved Family Member Perspective
Previous Article in Journal
Cognitive Remediation Therapy for Adolescents with Anorexia Nervosa—Treatment Satisfaction and the Perception of Change
Previous Article in Special Issue
Designing Effective Interactions for Concordance around End-of-Life Care Decisions: Lessons from Hospice Admission Nurses
Due to scheduled maintenance work on our core network, there may be short service disruptions on this website between 16:00 and 16:30 CEST on September 25th.
Article

Contradictions and Promise for End-of-Life Communication among Family and Friends: Death over Dinner Conversations

1
Department of Communication, Northern Kentucky University, Highland Heights, KY 41099, USA
2
Department of Communication, Eastern Michigan University, Ypsilanti, MI 48197, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Academic Editor: Maureen P. Keeley
Behav. Sci. 2017, 7(2), 24; https://doi.org/10.3390/bs7020024
Received: 16 February 2017 / Revised: 12 April 2017 / Accepted: 18 April 2017 / Published: 20 April 2017
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Family Communication at the End of Life)
The free, open-access website called “Let’s Get Together and Talk about Death”, or Death over Dinner (DoD), provides resources for initiating end-of-life conversations with family and friends by taking the frightening—talking about death—and transforming it into the familiar—a conversation over dinner. This qualitative, descriptive study uses grounded theory and thematic analysis to answer the following research question: How do friend and family groups communicate about death and dying in DoD conversations? To answer this question, 52 dinner groups were recruited and conversations were conducted, which consisted of a facilitator and volunteers. The facilitators were the researchers or research assistants who allowed dinner participants to control the conversation and identify topics of interest, and participants were free to share as much or as little as they wanted. Our analysis revealed that family and friend groups communicated similarly in that they talked about similar topics and used similar communication strategies to discuss those topics. Three major themes emerged: Desire for a good death, which juxtaposed people’s perceptions of a “dreaded” death with those of a “desirable” death; tactics for coping, which consisted of the subthemes of humour to diffuse tension or deflect discomfort, spiritual reassurance, and topic avoidance; and topics that elicit fear or uncertainty, which consisted of the subthemes of organ and whole-body donation, hospice and palliative care, wills and advance directives. Ultimately, however, participants felt their experiences were positive and DoD shows promise as a tool for families to engage in end-of-life conversations. View Full-Text
Keywords: end-of-life; family; friends; communication; death; dying end-of-life; family; friends; communication; death; dying
MDPI and ACS Style

Lambert South, A.; Elton, J. Contradictions and Promise for End-of-Life Communication among Family and Friends: Death over Dinner Conversations. Behav. Sci. 2017, 7, 24. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs7020024

AMA Style

Lambert South A, Elton J. Contradictions and Promise for End-of-Life Communication among Family and Friends: Death over Dinner Conversations. Behavioral Sciences. 2017; 7(2):24. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs7020024

Chicago/Turabian Style

Lambert South, Andrea, and Jessica Elton. 2017. "Contradictions and Promise for End-of-Life Communication among Family and Friends: Death over Dinner Conversations" Behavioral Sciences 7, no. 2: 24. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs7020024

Find Other Styles
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

1
Back to TopTop