Still Searching: A Meta-Synthesis of a Good Death from the Bereaved Family Member Perspective
AbstractThe concept of a good death continues to receive attention in end-of-life (EOL) scholarship. We sought to continue this line of inquiry related to a good death by conducting a meta-synthesis of published qualitative research studies that examined a good death from the bereaved family member’s perspective. Results of the meta-synthesis included 14 articles with 368 participants. Based on analysis, we present a conceptual model called The Opportunity Model for Presence during the EOL Process. The model is framed in socio-cultural factors, and major themes include EOL process engagement with categories of healthcare participants, communication and practical issues. The second theme, (dis)continuity of care, includes categories of place of care, knowledge of family member dying and moment of death. Both of these themes lead to perceptions of either a good or bad death, which influences the bereavement process. We argue the main contribution of the model is the ability to identify moments throughout the interaction where family members can be present to the EOL process. Recommendations for healthcare participants, including patients, family members and clinical care providers are offered to improve the quality of experience throughout the EOL process and limitations of the study are discussed. View Full-Text
A printed edition of this Special Issue is available here.
Share & Cite This Article
Tenzek, K.E.; Depner, R. Still Searching: A Meta-Synthesis of a Good Death from the Bereaved Family Member Perspective. Behav. Sci. 2017, 7, 25.
Tenzek KE, Depner R. Still Searching: A Meta-Synthesis of a Good Death from the Bereaved Family Member Perspective. Behavioral Sciences. 2017; 7(2):25.Chicago/Turabian Style
Tenzek, Kelly E.; Depner, Rachel. 2017. "Still Searching: A Meta-Synthesis of a Good Death from the Bereaved Family Member Perspective." Behav. Sci. 7, no. 2: 25.
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.