Next Article in Journal
Relieving or Aggravating? The Longitudinal Moderating Role of Challenge and Hindrance Academic Stressors on the Relationship Between Leisure-Time Physical Activity and Context-Specific Anxiety Symptoms Among University Faculty
Previous Article in Journal
Factors Associated with Dropout Intention in Engineering Education: A Learning Interpretable Modeling Approach
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
This is an early access version, the complete PDF, HTML, and XML versions will be available soon.
Article

Who Accommodates Whom? Bidirectional Linguistic Accommodation and Progressive Interpersonal Convergence in Human–AI Conversations

1
Department of Digital Culture and Contents, Graduate School, Konkuk University, Seoul 05029, Republic of Korea
2
Department of Arts and Cultural Management, Graduate School, Hongik University, Seoul 04066, Republic of Korea
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Behav. Sci. 2026, 16(5), 720; https://doi.org/10.3390/bs16050720
Submission received: 31 March 2026 / Revised: 1 May 2026 / Accepted: 5 May 2026 / Published: 7 May 2026
(This article belongs to the Topic Personality and Cognition in Human–AI Interaction)

Abstract

Linguistic accommodation during human–AI interaction has been measured in only one direction at a time, leaving the relative magnitude of each side and the trajectory of within-conversation change unresolved. A symmetric within-versus-between conversation dissociation design applied to 1319 multi-turn English GPT-4o conversations from WildChat measures both user-side and model-side function word adaptation within the same data, revealing two distinct temporal dynamics. The model’s adaptation is front-loaded, with strong initial accommodation at the first turn followed by stabilization, while users converge gradually across subsequent turns on interpersonal pronoun dimensions with no progressive change in topic-related categories. In 500 Switchboard human–human conversations, per-conversation similarity slopes are significantly negative (p=0.022), though the multilevel interaction is marginal (p=0.055). Because the pronoun dimensions on which users converge are the primary linguistic markers through which personality traits manifest in natural language use, this progressive convergence may represent a linguistic indicator of shifts in communicative self-presentation during extended human–AI conversation.
Keywords: linguistic accommodation; human-AI interaction; self-presentation; function word convergence; interpersonal orientation linguistic accommodation; human-AI interaction; self-presentation; function word convergence; interpersonal orientation

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Chen, P.; Guan, H.; Jeong, E.J. Who Accommodates Whom? Bidirectional Linguistic Accommodation and Progressive Interpersonal Convergence in Human–AI Conversations. Behav. Sci. 2026, 16, 720. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs16050720

AMA Style

Chen P, Guan H, Jeong EJ. Who Accommodates Whom? Bidirectional Linguistic Accommodation and Progressive Interpersonal Convergence in Human–AI Conversations. Behavioral Sciences. 2026; 16(5):720. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs16050720

Chicago/Turabian Style

Chen, Pengbo, Huining Guan, and Eui Jun Jeong. 2026. "Who Accommodates Whom? Bidirectional Linguistic Accommodation and Progressive Interpersonal Convergence in Human–AI Conversations" Behavioral Sciences 16, no. 5: 720. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs16050720

APA Style

Chen, P., Guan, H., & Jeong, E. J. (2026). Who Accommodates Whom? Bidirectional Linguistic Accommodation and Progressive Interpersonal Convergence in Human–AI Conversations. Behavioral Sciences, 16(5), 720. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs16050720

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop