Next Article in Journal
The Relationship Between Parental Psychological Control and Non-Suicidal Self-Injury in Adolescents: A Chain Mediation Model
Previous Article in Journal
Correction: Zhou et al. (2025). Financial Status of Model, Target, and Observer Modulates Mate Choice Copying and the Mediating Effect of Personality. Behavioral Sciences, 15(10), 1324
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Systematic Review

The Impact of Societal Ageing on Individual Consumers’ Insurance Purchase Intentions: A Review and Research Agenda

by
Mohd Hafizuddin-Syah Bangaan Abdullah
,
Zhangwei Zheng
*,
Hafizah Omar Zaki
and
Qin Lingda Tan
Faculty of Economics and Management, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Bangi 43600, Selangor, Malaysia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Behav. Sci. 2026, 16(1), 143; https://doi.org/10.3390/bs16010143
Submission received: 21 October 2025 / Revised: 21 November 2025 / Accepted: 25 November 2025 / Published: 20 January 2026
(This article belongs to the Section Behavioral Economics)

Abstract

This study examines how societal ageing influences insurance purchasing intentions, addressing the prevailing emphasis on elderly consumers and the limited conceptual integration of ageing within existing behavioural models. Following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, a systematic review was conducted using an initial search (forty-three studies) supplemented by a top-up search in November 2025 that identified fourteen additional articles. Using the theories-contexts-characteristics-methods (TCCM) framework, the review synthesises theoretical, contextual, characteristic, and methodological patterns in this field. The findings indicate that although variables such as risk perception, anticipated dependence, and interpersonal influence are frequently examined, ageing itself is seldom conceptualised as an explanatory construct, constraining theoretical precision and practical relevance. To bridge this gap, the study introduces ageing risks (AR)—capturing perceived financial, health, and intergenerational uncertainties associated with demographic ageing—and illustrates its integration within the Theory of Planned Behaviour (TPB). The review highlights the need to validate AR empirically, extend research to non-elderly populations and underexplored regions, and broaden methodological approaches. These contributions strengthen theoretical development and inform more responsive insurance strategies in ageing societies.

1. Introduction

The phenomenon of ageing has become a focal point of global scholarly attention. Defined by a rising proportion of older individuals and unprecedented increases in life expectancy, ageing is reshaping demographic structures and driving complex societal changes (Cox, 1956; Zheng et al., 2025a). This demographic shift extends beyond population composition, influencing healthcare systems (Foster, 2018), pension schemes (Jaafar et al., 2019), and social support frameworks (Nagarajan & Sixsmith, 2023). While ageing is commonly associated with the elderly, it is increasingly recognised as a broader societal phenomenon that affects individuals across all age groups, reshaping family dynamics (Patterson, 2007), workforce structures (Adnand et al., 2021), and individual decision-making (Zheng et al., 2024b).
Despite extensive research on ageing and its societal implications, its influence on insurance purchasing intentions remains underexplored (Zheng et al., 2024a, 2025a). Studies have primarily examined demographic or economic determinants of insurance demand (Outreville, 1996; D. Li et al., 2007), household insurance behaviour (Y. Lin & Grace, 2007; Frees & Sun, 2010), and macro-level impacts of ageing on financial systems (Baharin & Saad, 2018; Nebolsina, 2020; G. Li et al., 2021). Existing research often focuses on older individuals, analysing how caregiving experiences shape insurance considerations (Alavi et al., 2010; Tennyson & Yang, 2014; Broyles et al., 2016), how expectations of dependency influence planning (Costa-Font & Courbage, 2015; Xu et al., 2020; He et al., 2023), and how risk perceptions affect insurance decisions (Tolani et al., 2019; Choe et al., 2022; Wu & Gong, 2023). However, research rarely considers the broader impact of ageing as a social construct, particularly on non-elderly individuals, who may also adjust their insurance decisions in response to ageing-related societal trends. For example, families with both elderly and younger dependents may prioritise insurance differently from those without caregiving responsibilities (Tennyson & Yang, 2014; Broyles et al., 2016). Similarly, non-elderly consumers with chronic illnesses may be more attuned to the financial risks of ageing (Guillemette et al., 2016; Tam et al., 2021).
From a practical perspective, the evolution of the insurance industry necessitates a nuanced understanding of consumer behaviour (Al Mamun et al., 2022; Bangaan Abdullah et al., 2022). As ageing becomes a global concern, understanding its influence on insurance purchasing intentions is essential for addressing diverse consumer needs and enhancing insurance penetration worldwide. Such insights can guide policymakers, insurers, and brokers in fostering sustainable growth in the sector. Against this backdrop, a systematic review of existing research is both timely and necessary to provide actionable insights for academics and practitioners alike (Zheng et al., 2024a).
A review of existing literature reviews reveals that limited attention has been given to the relationship between ageing and insurance purchasing intentions. While Zniva and Weitzl (2016) and Zheng et al. (2024b) examined ageing’s effects on consumer behaviour more broadly, they did not address insurance as a distinct product category. Similarly, Guido et al. (2020) focused on financial asset management among the elderly, and Hettich et al. (2018) investigated older consumers’ decision-making in retail contexts, both overlooking insurance-related choices. Other studies, such as Yagi et al. (2022), explored health insurance literacy but did not examine purchasing intentions. Zheng et al. (2024a) conducted a scoping review on ageing’s impact on insurance purchasing intentions, providing valuable insights into general trends. However, their approach lacked a structured analytical framework, limiting the depth of theoretical, contextual, and methodological insights. Some reviews, such as Lambregts and Schut (2019), focus on specific insurance products like long-term care insurance, offering a narrow perspective that does not encompass broader ageing-related financial behaviours. Additionally, existing reviews predominantly centre on elderly consumers, overlooking how societal ageing influences the insurance behaviours of non-elderly populations. This gap highlights the need for a review that synthesizes these strands within a unified analytical structure and explicitly links ageing to insurance-related decisions.
This study addresses these gaps by systematically analysing how societal ageing shapes insurance purchasing intentions across different demographic groups. By employing the TCCM framework (theories-contexts-characteristics-methods; Paul & Rosado-Serrano, 2019), this research provides a structured evaluation of theoretical applications, contextual factors, consumer characteristics, and methodological approaches in this domain. Expanding the scope beyond the elderly, this study recognises ageing as a societal phenomenon that influences financial decision-making across life stages, offering a more comprehensive perspective on consumer behaviour in ageing societies.
The primary contribution of this study lies in its framework-based systematic review of how ageing influences insurance purchasing intentions. By introducing ageing risks (AR) as an explanatory construct, this study provides a structured approach to understanding how individuals perceive and respond to future financial and health-related uncertainties associated with societal ageing. Unlike prior reviews that focus predominantly on the physiological and psychological effects of ageing on the elderly, this study broadens the analytical scope to include non-elderly populations, recognising ageing as a societal phenomenon that shapes financial behaviour across life stages. Furthermore, by applying the TCCM framework, this study offers a structured evaluation of theoretical applications, contextual influences, consumer characteristics, and methodological approaches in this domain. Finally, by incorporating AR into an illustrative conceptual framework based on the Theory of Planned Behaviour (TPB), this study demonstrates how ageing-related perceptions can be integrated into established consumer behaviour models, providing a foundation for future empirical research.
The following sections detail the methodology, present results through the TCCM framework, discuss findings, propose conceptual framework, and recommend for future research. The conclusion synthesises key insights and outlines the study’s academic and practical implications.

2. Methodology

This systematic review follows the procedures established by the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA; see checklist in the Supplementary File) (Page et al., 2021). The TCCM framework was selected for its ability to systematically organise and synthesise theoretical approaches, data sources, contexts, and methodologies across diverse fields, facilitating a thorough and structured analysis (Paul & Rosado-Serrano, 2019; Paul et al., 2023). The methodology consists of the following three key stages: search strategy, study selection, and data extraction and synthesis.

2.1. Search Strategy

The search was conducted in September 2023, covering the following four major online databases: Web of Science, Scopus, ScienceDirect, and Emerald Insight. Four keyword sets were utilised to ensure comprehensive results. “Ageing” was included due to its relevance to both ageing population and its impact. Keywords such as “insurance,” “purchase,” and “intention,” along with their synonyms and related phrases, were used to capture studies on insurance purchasing intentions. These terms reflect widely adopted terminology in ageing and insurance research, and their selection aligns with keyword structures employed in prior reviews in this field (e.g., Zheng et al., 2024a). No restrictions, such as publication year or language, were applied due to the limited number of relevant studies. This approach aimed to comprehensively reflect the current scholarly landscape by minimising unnecessary screening criteria. Table 1 outlines the detailed search strategies and outcomes, with adjustments made using the advanced search functionalities of the respective databases.
A supplementary top-up search using the same databases and keyword sets was conducted in November 2025 to capture newly published studies. This update adhered to the original protocol and ensured that the evidence base reflected the most recent literature at the time of revision.

2.2. Study Selection

The study selection process involved four authors to minimise bias—two independently screened studies based on predefined criteria, with the remaining two reviewing the outcomes for consistency. Any disagreements were resolved through consensus. The inclusion criteria focused on empirical studies addressing both “ageing” and “insurance purchase intentions” within business disciplines such as management, marketing, and finance. Eligible studies were required to use micro-level data, focus on individual consumers, and be published in SCIE-/SSCI-indexed journals or ESCI-indexed journals with an impact factor (IF) greater than 1, following Basu et al. (2022) and Paul et al. (2023). Studies were excluded if they were non-empirical, relied solely on macro-level data, lacked a direct connection between ageing and insurance purchase intentions, originated from non-business fields (e.g., medical or biological disciplines), were published in journals not meeting the indexing or IF requirements, or were non-research formats (e.g., conference abstracts, book chapters). Articles for which full texts were unavailable were also excluded. An exception was made for Yeung et al. (2013), which, despite being a conference paper, was included for providing valuable academic insights relevant to this topic.
The selection process is depicted in Figure 1. The search initially identified 1082 results across the four databases. After deduplication using EndNote 20, 1011 articles remained. A manual screening of titles and abstracts excluded 429 articles that did not align with the study’s objectives. Excluded articles primarily addressed medical topics such as disease treatment and healthcare resource allocation or focused on gerontology economics without relevance to micro-level insurance behaviour. This high exclusion rate is typical given the interdisciplinary and emerging nature of the research theme. Ultimately, 582 articles proceeded to full-text screening. Of these, 424 addressed only “ageing” or “insurance purchase intentions” without connecting the two; 44 were excluded for not being published in SCIE/SSCI-indexed journals or ESCI-indexed journals with an impact factor (IF) greater than 1; 51 relied on macro-level data; 10 were systematic reviews; and 10 were excluded due to inaccessible full texts. A total of 43 articles were synthesised for this review.

2.3. Data Extraction and Synthesis

The TCCM framework was applied during data extraction to systematically organise information, including general details (authors, title, publication year, journal), theories, contexts (countries and insurance types), characteristics (ageing-related antecedents, subject demographics, and decision variables), and methods (research design, data collection, sample size, and analysis techniques). Data extraction was conducted independently by two authors and cross-validated by the other two to minimise errors (Charrois, 2015; Gomersall et al., 2015). Given the inclusion of qualitative, quantitative, and mixed-methods research, a qualitative synthesis approach was used for analysis (Shaffril et al., 2021). Ethical approval and individual consent were deemed unnecessary as the review relied solely on publicly available data and fell within the exempt category for such requirements.
The core TCCM-based synthesis was undertaken using the 43 studies identified through the original search, whereas the 14 studies (Appendix A) located in the supplementary top-up search were incorporated as updated evidence without altering the primary dataset.

3. Results Based on TCCM Framework

Table 2 provides an overview of the results based on the TCCM framework (Paul & Rosado-Serrano, 2019). A detailed explanation follows.

3.1. Theories

Of the 43 articles analysed (Table 2), nearly half (20) did not specify the theoretical foundations of their investigations. Among those that did, the use of theories was highly varied. The most frequently employed is the Theory of Planned Behaviour (TPB), cited in 4 articles, followed by Utility Maximisation Theory in 3 articles. Theories such as Intrafamily Moral Hazard, Bounded Rationality, Insurance Demand, Rational Behaviour (TRA), and Prospect Theory are each mentioned in two articles. The remaining thirteen theories appear in only one article each.

3.2. Contexts

Table 2 summarises the geographical distribution and types of insurance covered in the analysed studies. The USA (13 articles) and China (12 articles) dominate the research focus on ageing and insurance purchase intentions. Europe, Spain, Australia, and the UAE each contributed two articles, while single articles from other countries reflect limited but notable geographic diversity.
Health insurance and long-term care insurance are the most studied types, appearing in 13 articles each. Life insurance and medical insurance follow with 5 articles each, while Islamic insurance (Takaful) and longevity annuities are examined in 3 articles each. Travel insurance is covered in 2 articles, and social old-age insurance is the least represented, with 1 article. This distribution underscores the prominence of health and long-term care insurance in ageing contexts, while also highlighting broader interest in various aspects of insurance purchase behaviour among older consumers.

3.3. Characteristics

3.3.1. Subject’s Age

Of the 43 articles analysed (Table 2), 16 either do not specify age ranges or include overly broad categories, such as studies covering all age groups. Among the remaining 27 articles, 19 rely on primary data, with 11 focusing on elderly populations, and 8 addressing non-elderly groups. However, only 2 of the latter—Nosi et al. (2014) on young adults’ longevity annuities (aged 25–35) and Tam et al. (2021) on private health insurance among young Australians (18–30)—specifically target defined non-elderly demographics. The other six articles, such as Aziz et al. (2019) and Dragos et al. (2020), include non-elderly age ranges but focus on general factors influencing insurance purchase intentions rather than the specific impacts of ageing on this population. In contrast, studies on elderly populations demonstrate more targeted approaches, addressing their unique challenges and behaviours. This highlights a predominant focus on elderly groups, with limited research examining non-elderly populations in the context of ageing. Addressing this gap is essential for a comprehensive understanding of ageing’s societal impacts on insurance behaviours.

3.3.2. Antecedents Related to Ageing

The selected articles, all related to ageing, either focus on insurance or specific populations and employ variables reflecting the impact of ageing (i.e., ageing-related antecedents). Table 2 lists eighteen such variables. Demographic factors are the most frequently used, including age (43 articles), marital status (23 articles), health status (22 articles), and the number of dependents (16 articles). These fundamental variables are crucial for understanding the ageing phenomenon and its implications for insurance purchase intentions. However, relying solely on demographic factors fails to fully capture the societal dimensions of ageing, highlighting the need for additional variables. Cognitive-related variables (e.g., cognitive abilities and age) are excluded for similar reasons.
Family-related variables, such as interpersonal influence (5 articles), caregiving experience (2 articles), and bequest motive (2 articles), emphasise the familial context’s role in shaping insurance decisions. Experiences like caregiving and family involvement significantly impact perceptions and decision-making regarding insurance. Risk-related variables are also prominent, with risk perception appearing in 7 articles and risk propensity in 3 articles, reflecting how individuals perceive and manage risks—an essential aspect of insurance decision-making.
Expectation-related variables, including family insurance expectations (self-insurance) (5 articles), anticipated dependence (4 articles), life expectancy expectations (2 articles), public insurance expectations (2 articles), and perceived economic instability (1 article), capture forward-looking considerations. These variables highlight the anticipatory nature of ageing and its influence on insurance purchase intentions, offering deeper insights into how individuals plan for future uncertainties.

3.3.3. Corresponding Decision

The corresponding decision variables shed light on insurance-related behaviours and outcomes in the context of ageing. Purchase intention is the most frequently studied variable (21 articles), followed by insurance purchase status (9 articles), willingness to pay (9 articles), decision-making performance (3 articles), purchase preference (3 articles), frequency of health insurance use (1 article), and insurance purchase priority (1 article). These variables are essential for understanding individuals’ decision-making processes and outcomes in an ageing society.

3.4. Methods

The methodologies outlined in Table 2 reveal several key trends. Quantitative methods dominate, employed in 38 articles, while only 3 use qualitative methods and 2 adopt mixed methods, reflecting a strong reliance on statistical data to study insurance purchase intentions in the context of ageing.
Data collection is conducted primarily through questionnaires (23 articles) and secondary data sources (17 articles), with focus groups and experiments used less frequently (3 and 2 articles, respectively), offering additional qualitative and controlled insights. Sample sizes vary widely, with 12 articles using large national databases, 2 drawing from international databases, and 2 relying on local insurer databases. Primary data studies range from 23 participants in qualitative research to 7480 respondents in quantitative surveys, reflecting diverse research scales and contexts.
Regression analysis is the most common data analysis method, used in twenty-nine articles, with logistic, multinomial logit, and linear probability regressions being the primary techniques. Structural equation modelling (SEM), including partial least squares SEM (PLS-SEM), appears in six articles, addressing complex relationships and latent variables. The Contingent Valuation Method (CVM) is also employed in six articles to assess willingness to pay for insurance. Other methods are used in no more than three articles.

3.5. Updated Evidence from the Top-Up Search

The supplementary search conducted in November 2025 resulted in fourteen additional studies that met the predefined inclusion criteria. These studies reinforce and extend the patterns identified in the original synthesis. Several newly published papers continue to highlight the centrality of long-term care insurance in ageing societies, showing that subjective life expectancy influences life insurance uptake (X. Chen et al., 2024), cognitive abilities shape long-term care insurance demand (Gousia, 2023), and information interventions can strengthen long-term care insurance intentions among older adults (Liu et al., 2025). Evidence from discrete choice experiments further clarifies preference structures among older populations (Jin et al., 2024), while research on mental health spillovers highlights broader behavioural consequences of long-term care insurance participation (Y. Chen & Zhao, 2023).
Family roles and intergenerational expectations also emerge strongly in recent work. Studies show that children’s cohabitation and family asset reserves affect participation in commercial pension insurance (Feng et al., 2025), that pension responsibility norms and financial literacy shape willingness to purchase pension products (Han et al., 2025), and that children continue to function as a form of informal insurance shaping private insurance adoption among older adults (Ci, 2025). Additional evidence demonstrates that media exposure can moderate socio-economic inequalities in health insurance enrolment among older individuals (Barman et al., 2025) and that perceptions of pension responsibility influence pension insurance choices (Zhou et al., 2025).
Recent studies also expand attention beyond older adults. Research with young adults shows that loss aversion and temporal orientation influence life insurance decisions (Blanchard & Trudel, 2024), while work on participation in individual pension systems provides further evidence on behavioural drivers among working-age populations (Long et al., 2024). Contextual and structural influences are highlighted in investigations of implementation barriers in endowment insurance programmes within occupational settings (Cheng et al., 2023). Importantly, a recent cross-cultural study integrates ageing risks with behavioural theories to explain insurance purchase intentions across countries, offering conceptual alignment with the present review (Zheng et al., 2025b).
Taken together, the new evidence corroborates the core findings of this review: ageing-related expectations, intergenerational responsibilities, health and longevity perceptions, and socio-economic factors remain central determinants of insurance behaviours across demographic groups. While these studies broaden geographical and methodological coverage, they do not alter the main conclusions.

4. Discussion of Key Aspects

4.1. Lack of Direct Integration of Ageing into Insurance Research

Concerning the research content, scholars have extensively discussed specific factors influencing insurance purchasing intentions, such as cost, trust, brand equity, peer effects, and financial literacy (Reid et al., 2016; H. Lin & Prince, 2016; Rizwan et al., 2021; Kai et al., 2021; D. Li et al., 2022). However, these discussions rarely incorporate ageing as a factor or explore variables that explicitly reveal its impact on purchase intentions. Although certain variables, such as bequest motives, anticipated dependence, and risk perception (H. Lin & Prince, 2016; Xu et al., 2020; Choe et al., 2022), may partially reflect the influence of ageing, they are not intentionally linked to the ageing phenomenon. Similarly, studies focusing on specific types of insurance or populations often limit their scope to insurance products for ageing or the elderly (e.g., Guillemette et al., 2016; Kai et al., 2021). There is a notable lack of comprehensive research addressing the societal impacts of ageing on insurance purchasing intentions. In demand estimation studies, ageing is rarely considered unless the focus is directly on ageing-related insurance or populations. These studies primarily aim to determine pricing strategies to enhance consumers’ willingness to pay insurance premiums (e.g., Ying et al., 2007; Sowa et al., 2018). Overall, most existing studies only partially address the relationship between ageing and insurance purchasing intentions, leaving this topic largely unexplored.

4.2. Overemphasis on Elderly Consumers While Neglecting Non-Elderly Populations

The analysis of population age characteristics reveals that current studies predominantly focus on the elderly, with limited attention given to non-elderly individuals. This aligns with the preceding discussion, highlighting a fragmented exploration of ageing’s impact on consumer behaviour. For instance, studies often focus on specific types of insurance or ageing-related populations, neglecting the broader societal effects of ageing. Ageing, as a societal phenomenon, extends its influence across all age groups. Apart from directly affecting the elderly, it also impacts non-elderly individuals, such as adult children, younger generations, and caregivers (Pinquart & Sörensen, 2003; Zheng et al., 2024b). Among the reviewed studies, only Nosi et al. (2014) and Tam et al. (2021) specifically examined non-elderly individuals’ insurance purchase intentions. However, these studies merely analysed influencing factors without linking them to the ageing phenomenon. This underscores a significant gap in understanding how ageing affects insurance purchasing intentions among non-elderly populations.

4.3. Fragmented Use of Ageing-Related Variables Without Conceptual Clarity

Another key aspect involves the manifestations of ageing’s impact. As indicated in the results, several variables—such as risk perception, interpersonal influence, family insurance expectations (self-insurance), saving behaviour, anticipated dependence, and risk propensity—are frequently used to illustrate these impacts. Among these, variables related to future expectations (e.g., family insurance expectations and anticipated dependence) effectively reflect the influence of ageing, particularly on non-elderly individuals whose outlooks are intricately shaped by ageing-related considerations. Variables such as risk perception and risk propensity capture consumers’ attitudes towards risks associated with ageing, while interpersonal influence highlights the social effects of ageing, akin to subjective norms in the TPB (Ajzen, 1985, 1991). Saving behaviour relates to perceived behavioural control in the TPB, indicating whether individuals have sufficient resources for insurance decisions. As TPB is the most frequently employed theory in this field, future research should incorporate its key components—attitude, subjective norms, and perceived behavioural control—while integrating variables related to risk and expectations to provide a more comprehensive understanding of ageing’s impact on insurance purchasing intentions.
Furthermore, the variables identified in this study are synthesised from existing research. There may be additional variables yet to be employed that are equally relevant for reflecting the effects of ageing, representing a potential direction for future research. This indicates an opportunity to explore latent research gaps and expand the understanding of ageing’s broader societal impacts.

5. Conceptual Framework: The Role of Societal Ageing in Insurance Purchase Intentions

The findings from this review highlight critical gaps in the literature regarding the role of ageing in insurance decision-making. While existing research acknowledges variables such as risk perception, anticipated dependence, and family insurance expectations, these constructs are rarely conceptualised within the broader context of societal ageing. Furthermore, the predominant focus on elderly consumers has led to an overlooked yet significant research gap concerning non-elderly individuals and their insurance-related behaviours in response to demographic ageing trends.
To address this gap, this study proposes ageing risks (AR) as an explanatory construct that captures the perceived future financial, health, and intergenerational implications of demographic ageing. While previous research has examined ageing-related factors in isolation, these elements have not been systematically consolidated into a structured concept that reflects how individuals interpret and respond to societal ageing.
To illustrate its application, this study employs the Theory of Planned Behaviour (TPB) (Ajzen, 1991) as a demonstrative framework. TPB has been widely applied in insurance research (Dragos et al., 2020; Rizwan et al., 2021) and provides a structured approach to examining how ageing risks shape key determinants of decision-making. While TPB is used here as an illustrative model, the conceptualisation of AR is not restricted to this framework and can be extended to other behavioural theories in future research.
The proposed framework conceptualises AR as an independent variable representing individuals’ perceived exposure to future financial and health-related uncertainties associated with societal ageing, making it particularly suitable for examining the impact of societal ageing on non-elderly individuals. Unlike traditional ageing-related constructs, which predominantly focus on the elderly, AR captures how demographic ageing shapes the expectations, perceived risks, and financial behaviours of younger populations, including working-age adults and those with ageing family members. By incorporating AR into behavioural models, this framework enables a more comprehensive analysis of how non-elderly individuals anticipate and respond to the long-term economic and caregiving implications of an ageing society, influencing their insurance-related decisions. The model hypothesises that AR shapes the key components of TPB in the following ways.
First, AR shapes individuals’ attitudes towards insurance. Individuals who perceive greater ageing risks such as rising healthcare costs, pension inadequacy, and economic uncertainty in later life are more likely to develop a favourable attitude towards insurance as a risk-mitigation tool (Costa-Font & Courbage, 2015; Yeh et al., 2021). Studies have shown that heightened awareness of longevity risks increases the perceived necessity of insurance, particularly among non-elderly individuals planning for later life (He et al., 2023).
Second, AR influences subjective norms. AR reinforces social and familial expectations regarding financial preparedness for ageing-related risks. Individuals embedded in cultures that prioritise intergenerational financial responsibility may experience greater social pressure to secure insurance, particularly from family members (Tennyson & Yang, 2014; Broyles et al., 2016). In collectivist societies, interpersonal influence plays a key role in shaping perceptions of ageing risks, further amplifying the perceived social obligation to purchase insurance (Kai et al., 2021; Wu & Gong, 2023).
Third, perceived behavioural control is shaped by AR. AR interacts with economic constraints and policy uncertainty, shaping an individual’s perceived ability to act upon insurance intentions. If ageing risks are perceived as manageable through insurance coverage, individuals may exhibit greater confidence in their purchasing decisions. Conversely, if the financial burden of ageing is perceived as insurmountable, perceived behavioural control may decline, deterring insurance uptake (Costa-Font & Rovira-Forns, 2008; Wang et al., 2021a).
By positioning AR as an independent variable, this framework provides a structured means to analyse how societal ageing translates into individual insurance purchase intention. While TPB is employed to demonstrate its applicability, the conceptualisation of AR is not limited to this model and can inform broader theoretical discussions on consumer decision-making and financial behaviour. Figure 2 presents the proposed framework.

6. Future Research Directions

The findings of this study highlight several gaps in the literature and suggest opportunities for future research to deepen understanding of how ageing impacts insurance purchasing intentions.
First, future research should empirically validate and refine ageing risks (AR) as an explanatory construct, ensuring its theoretical and methodological robustness. While this study conceptualises AR as an independent variable capturing individuals’ perceptions of financial and health-related uncertainties associated with societal ageing, further research is needed to standardise its measurement. Developing an “ageing risks index” would enable systematic assessment of how ageing perceptions influence financial decision-making, facilitating empirical analysis across different socioeconomic and cultural contexts. Longitudinal studies could track changes in individuals’ perceived ageing risks over time, providing insights into their evolving impact on insurance behaviour. Additionally, testing AR within alternative theoretical frameworks—such as the Health Belief Model (to explore its role in risk-prevention behaviour), Prospect Theory (to examine how AR shapes insurance-related risk framing), or Self-Determination Theory (to assess its interaction with financial autonomy)—would enhance its applicability beyond TPB.
Second, expanding geographical and product scope remains a critical research priority. Existing studies are predominantly concentrated in the USA and China, limiting the generalisability of findings to diverse socioeconomic and regulatory contexts. Future research should examine how variations in pension systems, public healthcare coverage, and cultural attitudes towards ageing shape insurance purchasing behaviour in underrepresented regions, particularly in emerging markets. Additionally, while much of the literature focuses on health and long-term care insurance, examining the impact of ageing risks on other insurance types, such as life, household, or travel insurance, could provide a more comprehensive perspective on consumer financial protection strategies.
Third, research should move beyond the elderly and explore how non-elderly populations respond to societal ageing. Ageing is a demographic shift that influences financial planning across all age groups, particularly working-age individuals and those with ageing relatives. Future studies should investigate how younger adults, particularly those anticipating caregiving responsibilities, adjust their insurance decisions in response to perceived ageing risks. Understanding these indirect effects is crucial for developing age-inclusive insurance policies that address long-term financial security concerns beyond the elderly population.
Finally, future research should integrate qualitative and mixed-methods approaches to complement predominantly quantitative studies. While quantitative models provide statistical validation, they often fail to capture the nuanced decision-making processes underlying insurance behaviour. In-depth qualitative studies, such as interviews and case studies, could offer richer insights into how personal experiences with ageing influence financial planning and insurance uptake. Combining qualitative insights with quantitative modelling would provide a more holistic understanding of consumer responses to societal ageing.
In summary, future research should focus on validating and extending the AR construct, broadening geographical and insurance product diversity, examining non-elderly populations, and incorporating mixed-methods approaches. Addressing these gaps will advance theoretical and empirical understanding of how societal ageing shapes insurance purchasing intentions. Table 3 provides specific research questions corresponding to these future research directions.

7. Conclusions

This study systematically reviewed the literature on the impact of ageing on individual consumers’ insurance purchasing intentions, following the PRISMA guidelines (Page et al., 2021) and employing the TCCM framework (Paul & Rosado-Serrano, 2019). A rigorous screening process identified 43 relevant articles from an initial pool of 1082. The analysis revealed significant gaps, including a limited focus on non-elderly populations, insufficient exploration of ageing-specific variables, and a concentration on particular geographical regions and insurance types. To address these gaps, this study introduces ageing risks (AR) as an explanatory construct that captures individuals’ perceived financial and health-related uncertainties associated with societal ageing. By integrating AR into a structured conceptual framework, exemplified through TPB, this study provides a foundation for future empirical research on how ageing perceptions shape insurance purchasing decisions.
The theoretical contribution of this study lies in highlighting the fragmented use of theoretical frameworks, particularly the lack of explicit ageing-related variables within established models such as the Theory of Planned Behaviour (TPB). By conceptualising AR as a structured explanatory variable, this study offers a systematic approach to incorporating ageing-related concerns into consumer behaviour research. While TPB serves as an illustrative example, AR can be adapted to other theoretical perspectives, broadening its relevance to financial decision-making in ageing societies.
From a practical perspective, this study underscores the importance of understanding how societal ageing influences insurance purchasing decisions across different populations and contexts. Incorporating AR into consumer segmentation strategies could help insurers develop products that address financial and caregiving uncertainties associated with ageing. Expanding insurance offerings beyond traditional health and long-term care policies to include products that mitigate broader ageing-related financial risks could improve accessibility and market penetration.
In conclusion, this study not only identifies critical gaps and emerging trends in the literature but also sets a research agenda for addressing the complexities of societal ageing. By conceptualising AR and outlining key research priorities—including its empirical validation, expansion across geographical and product contexts, and its impact on non-elderly populations—this study provides a structured foundation for advancing both theory and practice. As with prior reviews in this field, the synthesis is shaped by the heterogeneity of ageing-related measures across studies, which limits the degree to which constructs can be fully standardised. Moreover, the supplementary top-up search expanded the evidence base but was incorporated as updated contextual support rather than reanalysed within the core TCCM dataset to maintain methodological consistency. These limitations highlight opportunities for future research to advance more unified conceptualisations and broader empirical coverage, thereby supporting the sustainable development of insurance markets in ageing societies.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/bs16010143/s1.

Author Contributions

All authors contributed to the study conception and design. Literature search, data extraction, and analysis were performed by Z.Z. and Q.L.T. The drafting of the original manuscript was primarily undertaken by Z.Z., while M.H.-S.B.A. and H.O.Z. provided critical review and editing. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This study received financial support from the National University of Malaysia (UKM).

Institutional Review Board Statement

This research did not collect empirical data so ethical approval and consent were not required.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Data sharing is not applicable to this review article since there was no generation or analysis of new data in the study.

Acknowledgments

We sincerely thank our colleagues, mentors, and industry experts for their invaluable insights and guidance, which have been pivotal in advancing this research. Their commitment and constructive feedback have been essential to our study’s development.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Appendix A. Updated Evidence from the November 2025 Top-Up Search

No.Article
1Chen, Y., & Zhao, H. (2023). Long-term care insurance, mental health of the elderly and its spillovers. Frontiers in public health, 11, 982656. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2023.982656
2Cheng, B., Li, J., Han, Y., Zhang, T., Huang, J., & Chen, H. (2023). A qualitative investigation of barriers and facilitators involved in the implementation of endowment insurance in China’s construction industry. Buildings, 13(4), 1063. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings13041063
3Gousia, K. (2023). Cognitive abilities and long-term care insurance: Evidence from European data. The Geneva Papers on Risk and Insurance-Issues and Practice, 48(1), 68–101. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41288-021-00240-8
4Blanchard, S. J., & Trudel, R. (2024). Life insurance, loss aversion, and temporal orientation: a field experiment and replication with young adults. Marketing Letters, 35(4), 575–587. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11002-023-09712-4
5Chen, X., Guo, Y., Lu, C., Wang, Y., & Wen, H. (2024). Does subjective life expectancy matter in purchasing life insurance among middle-aged and older adult? Evidence from China. Frontiers in Public Health, 12, 1426366. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2024.1426366
6Jin, W., Wang, J., & Hu, X. (2024). Preference of urban and rural older people in Shandong Province for long-term care insurance: based on discrete choice experiment. Frontiers in Public Health, 12, 1445273. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2024.1445273
7Long, Z., Niu, J., & Yi, F. (2024). Driving factors and micro-mechanism of residents’ participation intention in individual pension system. Heliyon, 10(2). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e24488
8Barman, P., Karmakar, R., Roy, A., & Dakua, M. (2025). Mass Media Exposure Moderates the Association of Education and Wealth with Enrollment in Health Insurance Among Older Adults Aged 60 Years and Older in India. Journal of Aging & Social Policy, 37(3), 451–475. https://doi.org/10.1080/08959420.2024.2401713
9Ci, Z. (2025). Children as insurance revisited: Impact of children on private insurance adoption among older parents. Journal of Risk and Insurance, 92(1), 116–138. https://doi.org/10.1111/jori.12492
10Feng, C., Ying, Z., Yang, L., Wu, L., & Liu, B. (2025). How do children’s cohabitation and family asset reserves impact rural individuals’ participation in commercial pension insurance?. Frontiers in Public Health, 13, 1548241. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2025.1548241
11Han, B., Liu, C., & Ling, W. (2025). Impact of financial literacy and awareness of children’s pension responsibilities on the willingness to purchase pension insurance: Evidence based on survey data (CLASS). Finance Research Letters, 76, 107015. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2025.107015
12Liu, J., Hao, J., Maitland, E., Nicholas, S., Wang, J., & Leng, A. (2025). Shaping Long-term Care Insurance Intentions Among Chinese Adults Aged 50–70: Role of Information Interventions in Health Risks. Innovation in Aging, igaf054. https://doi.org/10.1093/geroni/igaf054
13Zheng, Z., Hafizuddin-Syah, B. A. M., Zaki, H. O., & Tan, Q. L. (2025). From Aging Risks to Insurance Purchase Intentions: A Cross-Cultural Integration of Social Influence and Planned Behavior Theories. Journal of Consumer Behaviour. https://doi.org/10.1002/cb.70070
14Zhou, L., Zhu, W., Cui, Y., Chen, Y., & Xu, X. (2025). Research on the impact of residents’ pension insurance choices based on their cognition of pension responsibility. Frontiers in Public Health, 13, 1592206. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2025.1592206

References

  1. Adnand, F. E. M., Rose, R. A. C., Aiyub, K., Lyndon, N., & Hussain, M. Y. (2021). Health awareness affecting ageing trend in Kuala Lumpur. Geografia, 17(3), 221–233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Ajzen, I. (1985). From intentions to actions: A theory of planned behavior. In Action control: From cognition to behavior (pp. 11–39). Springer. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 179–211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Alavi, K., Sail, R. M., Idris, K., & Abu Samah, A. (2010). Experiences of adult children caring for aged parents: A study among low income urban Malay. Akademik, 78(1), 77–87. [Google Scholar]
  5. Al Mamun, A., Rahman, M. K., Yang, Q., Jannat, T., Salameh, A. A., & Fazal, S. A. (2022). Predicting the willingness and purchase of travel insurance during the COVID-19 pandemic. Frontiers in Public Health, 10, 907005. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Ampaw, S., Nketiah-Amponsah, E., & Owoo, N. S. (2018). Gender perspective on life insurance demand in Ghana. International Journal of Social Economics, 45(12), 1631–1646. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Aziz, S., Husin, M. M., Hussin, N., & Afaq, Z. (2019). Factors that influence individuals’ intentions to purchase family takaful mediating role of perceived trust. Asia Pacific Journal of Marketing and Logistics, 31(1), 81–104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Baharin, R., & Saad, S. (2018). Ageing population and health care expenditure: Evidence using time series analysis. Geografia, 14(4), 65–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Bangaan Abdullah, H. S., Yakob, R., Yakob, S., & Sharif, N. S. (2022). Indicators of having a micro-family takaful plan amongst low-income earners. Journal of Islamic Marketing, 13(12), 2695–2716. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Barman, P., Karmakar, R., Roy, A., & Dakua, M. (2025). Mass media exposure moderates the association of education and wealth with enrollment in health insurance among older adults aged 60 years and older in India. Journal of Aging & Social Policy, 37(3), 451–475. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Basu, R., Paul, J., & Singh, K. (2022). Visual merchandising and store atmospherics: An integrated review and future research directions. Journal of Business Research, 151, 397–408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Blanchard, S. J., & Trudel, R. (2024). Life insurance, loss aversion, and temporal orientation: A field experiment and replication with young adults. Marketing Letters, 35(4), 575–587. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Broyles, I. H., Sperber, N. R., Voils, C. I., Konetzka, R. T., Coe, N. B., & Van Houtven, C. H. (2016). Understanding the context for long-term care planning. Medical Care Research and Review, 73(3), 349–368. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Charrois, T. L. (2015). Systematic reviews: What do you need to know to get started? The Canadian Journal of Hospital Pharmacy, 68(2), 144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Chen, X., Guo, Y., Lu, C., Wang, Y., & Wen, H. (2024). Does subjective life expectancy matter in purchasing life insurance among middle-aged and older adult? Evidence from China. Frontiers in Public Health, 12, 1426366. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Chen, Y., & Zhao, H. (2023). Long-term care insurance, mental health of the elderly and its spillovers. Frontiers in Public Health, 11, 982656. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Cheng, B., Li, J., Han, Y., Zhang, T., Huang, J., & Chen, H. (2023). A qualitative investigation of barriers and facilitators involved in the implementation of endowment insurance in China’s construction industry. Buildings, 13(4), 1063. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Choe, Y., Kim, H., & Choi, Y. (2022). Willingness to pay for travel insurance as a risk reduction behavior: Health-related risk perception after the outbreak of COVID-19. Service Business, 16(3), 445–467. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Ci, Z. (2025). Children as insurance revisited: Impact of children on private insurance adoption among older parents. Journal of Risk and Insurance, 92(1), 116–138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Colón-Morales, C. M., Giang, W. C., & Alvarado, M. (2021). Informed decision-making for health insurance enrollment: Survey study. JMIR Formative Research, 5(8), e27477. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Costa-Font, J., & Courbage, C. (2015). Crowding out of long-term care insurance: Evidence from European expectations data. Health Economics, 24, 74–88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Costa-Font, J., & Font, M. (2009). Does ‘early purchase’ improve the willingness to pay for long-term care insurance? Applied Economics Letters, 16(13), 1301–1305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Costa-Font, J., & Rovira-Forns, J. (2008). Who is willing to pay for long-term care insurance in Catalonia? Health Policy, 86(1), 72–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Cox, P. R. (1956). The aging of populations and its economic and social implications. United Nations, Department of Economic and Social Affairs. [Google Scholar]
  25. Dong, H., Kouyate, B., Cairns, J., Mugisha, F., & Sauerborn, R. (2003). Willingness-to-pay for community-based insurance in Burkina Faso. Health Economics, 12(10), 849–862. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Dragos, S. L., Dragos, C. M., & Muresan, G. M. (2020). From intention to decision in purchasing life insurance and private pensions: Different effects of knowledge and behavioural factors. Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics, 87, 101555. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Eling, M., Ghavibazoo, O., & Hanewald, K. (2021). Willingness to take financial risks and insurance holdings: A European survey. Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics, 95, 101781. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Feng, C., Ying, Z., Yang, L., Wu, L., & Liu, B. (2025). How do children’s cohabitation and family asset reserves impact rural individuals’ participation in commercial pension insurance? Frontiers in Public Health, 13, 1548241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Foster, L. (2018). Active ageing, pensions and retirement in the UK. Journal of Population Ageing, 11, 117–132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Frees, E. W., & Sun, Y. (2010). Household life insurance demand: A multivariate two-part model. North American Actuarial Journal, 14(3), 338–354. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Gomersall, J. S., Jadotte, Y. T., Xue, Y., Lockwood, S., Riddle, D., & Preda, A. (2015). Conducting systematic reviews of economic evaluations. JBI Evidence Implementation, 13(3), 170–178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Gousia, K. (2023). Cognitive abilities and long-term care insurance: Evidence from European data. The Geneva Papers on Risk and Insurance-Issues and Practice, 48(1), 68–101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Guido, G., Amatulli, C., & Sestino, A. (2020). Elderly consumers and financial choices: A systematic review. Journal of Financial Services Marketing, 25, 76–85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Guillemette, M. A., Martin, T. K., Cummings, B. F., & James, R. N. (2016). Determinants of the stated probability of purchase for longevity insurance. The Geneva Papers on Risk and Insurance-Issues and Practice, 41, 4–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Han, B., Liu, C., & Ling, W. (2025). Impact of financial literacy and awareness of children’s pension responsibilities on the willingness to purchase pension insurance: Evidence based on survey data (CLASS). Finance Research Letters, 76, 107015. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Hanoch, Y., & Rice, T. (2006). Can limiting choice increase social welfare? The elderly and health insurance. The Milbank Quarterly, 84(1), 37–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. He, A. J., Qian, J., Chan, W. S., & Chou, K. L. (2023). Willingness to purchase hypothetical private long-term care insurance plans in a super-ageing society: Evidence from Hong Kong. Journal of Aging & Social Policy, 35(6), 780–805. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Hettich, D., Hattula, S., & Bornemann, T. (2018). Consumer decision-making of older people: A 45-year review. The Gerontologist, 58(6), e349–e368. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Jaafar, R., Daly, K. J., & Mishra, A. V. (2019). Challenges facing Malaysia pension scheme in an era of ageing population. Finance Research Letters, 30, 334–340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Jin, W., Wang, J., & Hu, X. (2024). Preference of urban and rural older people in Shandong Province for long-term care insurance: Based on discrete choice experiment. Frontiers in Public Health, 12, 1445273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Kai, Y., Kany, Z., Chen, Z., Sun, X., & Tang, W. (2021). Social learning? Conformity? Or comparison?—An empirical study on the impact of peer effects on Chinese seniors’ intention to purchase travel insurance. Tourism Management Perspectives, 38, 100809. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Lambregts, T. R., & Schut, F. T. (2019). A systematic review of the reasons for low uptake of long-term care insurance and life annuities: Could integrated products counter them. Netspar Survey Paper, 55, 4–72. [Google Scholar]
  43. Li, D., Lv, J., Jing, L., Cao, C., & Shi, Y. (2022). Exploring the intention of middle-aged and elderly consumers to participate in inclusive medical insurance. IEEE Access, 10, 71398–71413. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Li, D., Moshirian, F., Nguyen, P., & Wee, T. (2007). The demand for life insurance in OECD countries. Journal of Risk and Insurance, 74(3), 637–652. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Li, G., Li, Z., & Lv, X. (2021). The ageing population, dependency burdens and household commercial insurance purchase: Evidence from China. Applied Economics Letters, 28(4), 294–298. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Lin, H., & Prince, J. T. (2016). Determinants of private long-term care insurance purchase in response to the partnership program. Health Services Research, 51(2), 687–703. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Lin, Y., & Grace, M. F. (2007). Household life cycle protection: Life insurance holdings, financial vulnerability, and portfolio implications. Journal of Risk and Insurance, 74(1), 141–173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Liu, J., Hao, J., Maitland, E., Nicholas, S., Wang, J., & Leng, A. (2025). Shaping long-term care insurance intentions among Chinese adults aged 50–70: Role of information interventions in health risks. Innovation in Aging, 9, igaf054. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Long, Z., Niu, J., & Yi, F. (2024). Driving factors and micro-mechanism of residents’ participation intention in individual pension system. Heliyon, 10(2), e24488. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  50. Löckenhoff, C. E., & Carstensen, L. L. (2007). Aging, emotion, and health-related decision strategies: Motivational manipulations can reduce age differences. Psychology and Aging, 22(1), 134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Mellor, J. M. (2001). Long-term care and nursing home coverage: Are adult children substitutes for insurance policies? Journal of Health Economics, 20(4), 527–547. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Nagarajan, N. R., & Sixsmith, A. (2023). Policy initiatives to address the challenges of an older population in the workforce. Ageing International, 48(1), 41–77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Nebolsina, E. (2020). The impact of demographic burden on insurance density. SAGE Open, 10(4), 2158244020983024. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Nosi, C., D’Agostino, A., Pagliuca, M. M., & Pratesi, C. A. (2014). Saving for old age: Longevity annuity buying intention of Italian young adults. Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics, 51, 85–98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Nosratnejad, S., Rashidian, A., Mehrara, M., Jafari, N., Moeeni, M., & Babamohamadi, H. (2016). Factors influencing basic and complementary health insurance purchasing decisions in Iran: Analysis of data from a national survey. World Medical & Health Policy, 8(2), 179–196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Ondruška, T., Pastorakova, E., & Brokešová, Z. (2020). Determinants of individual life-related insurance consumption: The case of the Slovak Republic. Ekonomicky Casopis, 68(8), 846–863. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Outreville, J. F. (1996). Life insurance markets in developing countries. Journal of Risk and Insurance, 63, 263–278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Page, M. J., McKenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., Shamseer, L., Tetzlaff, J. M., Akl, E. A., Brennan, S. E., Chou, R., Glanville, J., Grimshaw, J. M., Hróbjartsson, A., Lalu, M. M., Li, T., Loder, E. W., Mayo-Wilson, E., McDonald, S., … Moher, D. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ, 372, n71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  59. Paton Schmidt, A. (2019). The impact of cognitive style, consumer demographics and cultural values on the acceptance of Islamic insurance products among American consumers. International Journal of Bank Marketing, 37(2), 492–506. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Patterson, I. (2007). Information sources used by older adults for decision making about tourist and travel destinations. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 31(5), 528–533. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Paul, J., Khatri, P., & Kaur Duggal, H. (2023). Frameworks for developing impactful systematic literature reviews and theory building: What, why and how? Journal of Decision Systems, 33(4), 537–550. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Paul, J., & Rosado-Serrano, A. (2019). Gradual internationalization vs. born-global/international new venture models: A review and research agenda. International Marketing Review, 36(6), 830–858. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Pinquart, M., & Sörensen, S. (2003). Differences between caregivers and noncaregivers in psychological health and physical health: A meta-analysis. Psychology and Aging, 18(2), 250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Price, M. M., Crumley-Branyon, J. J., Leidheiser, W. R., & Pak, R. (2016). Effects of information visualization on older adults’ decision-making performance in a medicare plan selection task: A comparative usability study. JMIR Human Factors, 3(1), e5106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Reid, R. O., Deb, P., Howell, B. L., Conway, P. H., & Shrank, W. H. (2016). The roles of cost and quality information in Medicare Advantage plan enrollment decisions: An observational study. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 31, 234–241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Rice, T., Hanoch, Y., & Cummings, J. (2010). What factors influence seniors’ desire for choice among health insurance options? Survey results on the Medicare prescription drug benefit. Health Economics, Policy and Law, 5(4), 437–457. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Rizwan, S., Al-Malkawi, H. A., Gadar, K., Sentosa, I., & Abdullah, N. (2021). Impact of brand equity on purchase intentions: Empirical evidence from the health takāful industry of the United Arab Emirates. ISRA International Journal of Islamic Finance, 13(3), 349–365. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Shaffril, H. A. M., Samsuddin, S. F., & Samah, A. A. (2021). The ABC of systematic literature review: The basic methodological guidance for beginners. Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, 55(4), 1319–1346. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Shafie, A. A., & Hassali, M. A. (2013). Willingness to pay for voluntary community-based health insurance: Findings from an exploratory study in the state of Penang, Malaysia. Social Science & Medicine, 96, 272–276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Sowa, P. M., Kault, S., Byrnes, J., Ng, S. K., Comans, T., & Scuffham, P. A. (2018). Private health insurance incentives in Australia: In search of cost-effective adjustments. Applied Health Economics and Health Policy, 16, 31–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  71. Szrek, H., & Bundorf, M. K. (2011). Age and the purchase of prescription drug insurance by older adults. Psychology and Aging, 26(2), 308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Tam, L., Tyquin, E., Mehta, A., & Larkin, I. (2021). Determinants of attitude and intention towards private health insurance: A comparison of insured and uninsured young adults in Australia. BMC Health Services Research, 21(1), 246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  73. Taylor, A. J., & Ward, D. R. (2006). Consumer attributes and the UK market for private medical insurance. International Journal of Bank Marketing, 24(7), 444–460. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Tennyson, S., & Yang, H. K. (2014). The role of life experience in long-term care insurance decisions. Journal of Economic Psychology, 42, 175–188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Tolani, S., Rao, A., Worku, G. B., & Osman, M. (2019). System and neural network analysis of intent to buy and willingness to pay insurance premium. Managerial Finance, 45(1), 147–168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Wang, Q., Abiiro, G. A., Yang, J., Li, P., & De Allegri, M. (2021a). Preferences for long-term care insurance in China: Results from a discrete choice experiment. Social Science & Medicine, 281, 114104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Wang, Q., Wang, J., & Gao, F. (2021b). Who is more important, parents or children? Economic and environmental factors and health insurance purchase. The North American Journal of Economics and Finance, 58, 101479. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Wang, Q., Zhou, Y., Ding, X., & Ying, X. (2018). Demand for long-term care insurance in China. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 15(1), 6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Wu, G., & Gong, J. (2023). Investigating the intention of purchasing private pension scheme based on an integrated FBM-UTAUT model: The case of China. Frontiers in Psychology, 14, 1136351. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  80. Xu, X., Zhang, L., Chen, L., & Wei, F. (2020). Does COVID-2019 have an impact on the purchase intention of commercial long-term care insurance among the elderly in China? Healthcare, 8, 126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Yagi, B. F., Luster, J. E., Scherer, A. M., Farron, M. R., Smith, J. E., & Tipirneni, R. (2022). Association of health insurance literacy with health care utilization: A systematic review. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 37(2), 375–389. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  82. Yeh, S. C. J., Wang, W. C., Chou, H. C., & Chen, S. H. S. (2021). Private long-term care insurance decision: The role of income, risk propensity, personality, and life experience. Healthcare, 9, 102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Yeung, F., Lai, K. K., & Lee, Y. P. (2013, November 14–16). Effect of affordability on insurance purchase in Hong Kong. 2013 Sixth International Conference on Business Intelligence and Financial Engineering (pp. 324–328), Hangzhou, China. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Ying, X. H., Hu, T. W., Ren, J., Chen, W., Xu, K., & Huang, J. H. (2007). Demand for private health insurance in Chinese urban areas. Health Economics, 16(10), 1041–1050. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Zhang, C. (2015). Children, old-age support and pension in rural China. China Agricultural Economic Review, 7(3), 405–420. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Zheng, Z., Hafizuddin-Syah, B. A. M., Omar Zaki, H., & Tan, Q. L. (2024a). A scoping review of the impact of ageing on individual consumers’ insurance purchase intentions. Heliyon, 10(18), e37501. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Zheng, Z., Hafizuddin-Syah, B. A. M., Omar Zaki, H., & Tan, Q. L. (2024b). Impact of aging on consumer behavior: A review and research agenda. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 48(6), e70000. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Zheng, Z., Hafizuddin-Syah, B. A. M., Omar Zaki, H., & Tan, Q. L. (2025a). Aging and its societal impact: A bibliometric analysis. SAGE Open, 15(3), 21582440251362564. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Zheng, Z., Hafizuddin-Syah, B. A. M., Omar Zaki, H., & Tan, Q. L. (2025b). From aging risks to insurance purchase intentions: A cross-cultural integration of social influence and planned behavior theories. Journal of Consumer Behaviour. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Zhou, L., Zhu, W., Cui, Y., Chen, Y., & Xu, X. (2025). Research on the impact of residents’ pension insurance choices based on their cognition of pension responsibility. Frontiers in Public Health, 13, 1592206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  91. Zniva, R., & Weitzl, W. (2016). It’s not how old you are but how you are old: A review on aging and consumer behavior. Management Review Quarterly, 66(4), 267–297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. PRISMA flow diagram of studies search and selection.
Figure 1. PRISMA flow diagram of studies search and selection.
Behavsci 16 00143 g001
Figure 2. Proposed conceptual framework, adapted from Ajzen’s (1991) Theory of Planned Behavior.
Figure 2. Proposed conceptual framework, adapted from Ajzen’s (1991) Theory of Planned Behavior.
Behavsci 16 00143 g002
Table 1. Search strategies used in the systematic literature review.
Table 1. Search strategies used in the systematic literature review.
DatabaseSearch StrategySearch Results
Web of Science (WOS)(((TS = (aging OR ageing OR senescence)) AND TS = (insurance)) AND TS = (purchas* OR buy* OR acquire OR obtain OR shopping OR procure OR decision-making)) AND TS = (intent* OR desire OR willingness OR motivation)319
Scopus(TITLE-ABS-KEY(aging OR ageing OR senescence) AND (insurance) AND (purchas* OR buy* OR acquire OR obtain OR shopping OR procure OR decision-making) AND (intent* OR desire OR willingness OR motivation))512
ScienceDirect(aging OR ageing) AND (insurance) AND (purchase OR buy OR decision-making) AND (motivation OR intention OR willingness)34
Emerald Insightabstract:“insurance” AND (abstract:“aging” OR “ageing” OR “senescence”) AND (abstract:“purchase” OR “purchasing” OR “buying” OR “buy” OR “obtain” OR “shopping” OR “acquire” OR “procure” OR “decision-making”) AND (abstract:“intention” OR “intent” OR “motivation” OR “willingness” OR “desire”)
+
title:“insurance” AND (title:“aging” OR “ageing” OR “senescence”) AND (title:“purchase” OR “purchasing” OR “buying” OR “buy” OR “obtain” OR “shopping” OR “acquire” OR “procure” OR “decision-making”) AND (title:“intention” OR “intent” OR “motivation” OR “willingness” OR “desire”)
217
Total-1082
The asterisk (*) functions as a truncation operator that retrieves all word variants sharing the same root.
Table 2. Comprehensive overview of the results based on TCCM framework.
Table 2. Comprehensive overview of the results based on TCCM framework.
ArticleTheoriesContextsCharacteristicsMethods
CountryInsurance TypesAntecedents Related to AgeingSubject’s AgeCorresponding DecisionResearch DesignData CollectionSample SizeData Analysis
Mellor (2001)Theory of intrafamily moral hazardUSAlong-term care insuranceage; family insurance expectations (self-insurance); marital status; health status50+whether purchased insurance; purchase intentionquantitativesecondary dataLarge national databasesingle-equation probit regression; bivariate probit regression; ordered probit regression
Dong et al. (2003)not specifiedBurkina Fasohealth insuranceage; marital status20–70willingness to payquantitativequestionnaire survey800 familiescontingent valuation method (take-it-or-leave-it (TIOLI); bidding game)
Hanoch and Rice (2006)Theory of bounded rationalityUSAhealth insuranceage; cognitive abilities65+decision-making performancequalitativesecondary data/content analysis
Taylor and Ward (2006)not specifiedUKmedical insuranceage; health status; marital status; number of dependents; saving behaviournot specifiedwhether purchased insurancequantitativesecondary dataLarge national databaserandom-effects logistic regression
Löckenhoff and Carstensen (2007)Theory of positivity effectUSAmedical insuranceage; health status22–39; 62–93decision-making performancequantitativequestionnaire survey120correlation analysis
Ying et al. (2007)not specifiedChinahealth insuranceage; marital status; health statusnot specifiedwillingness to payquantitativesecondary dataLarge national databaselogistic regression
Costa-Font and Rovira-Forns (2008)not specifiedSpainlong-term care insuranceage; risk perception; family insurance expectations (self-insurance); health status; number of dependents55+willingness to paymixquestionnaire survey + focus group400contingent valuation method (single-bounded discrete referendum); probit regression
Costa-Font and Font (2009)Utility maximisation theorySpainlong-term care insuranceage; health status; risk perception55+willingness to paymixquestionnaire survey + focus group400discrete choice experiment (DCE); linearized logistic regression
Rice et al. (2010)Theory of bounded rationalityUSAhealth insuranceage; health status65+purchase preferencequantitativesecondary dataLarge national databaseweighted logistic regression; weighted multinomial regression
Szrek and Bundorf (2011)not specifiedUSAhealth insuranceage; cognitive abilities65+purchase intentionqualitativeexperiment281logistic regression
Shafie and Hassali (2013)not specifiedMalaysiahealth insuranceage; health status; presence of private insurance coverage; marital statusnot specifiedpurchase preference; willingness to payquantitativequestionnaire survey472contingent valuation method (bidding game); multinomial logit regression
Yeung et al. (2013)not specifiedChina (HK)life insurance, health insuranceage; health status; marital status; number of dependentsnot specifiedwhether purchased insurancequantitativequestionnaire survey/logistic regression
Nosi et al. (2014)Theory of Reasoned Action (TRA)Italylongevity annuity insuranceage; interpersonal influence25–35purchase intentionquantitativequestionnaire survey7480PLS-SEM
Tennyson and Yang (2014)Rational economic theoryUSAlong-term care insuranceage; caregiving experience; health status; marital status; number of dependents50–72purchase intentionquantitativesecondary dataLarge national databaseTwo-limit Tobit model
Costa-Font and Courbage (2015)State-dependent utility framework; Theory of intrafamily moral hazardEuropelong-term care insuranceage; family insurance expectations (self-insurance); public insurance expectations; risk perceptions; life expectancy expectations; anticipated dependence; health statusnot specifiedpurchase intentionquantitativesecondary dataLarge international databaselinear probability regression
Zhang (2015)not specifiedChinasocial old-age insuranceage; number of dependents; presence of private insurance coverage50–64purchase intentionquantitativesecondary dataLarge national databasedifference-in-differences (DID) analysis
Broyles et al. (2016)Life course theoryUSAlong-term care insuranceage; caregiving experience; interpersonal influence; perceived economic instability28–73purchase intentionqualitativefocus group59content analysis
Guillemette et al. (2016)Utility maximisation theoryUSAlongevity annuity insuranceage; health status; marital status; risk propensitynot specifiedpurchase intentionquantitativesecondary dataLarge national databaselinear probability regression
H. Lin and Prince (2016)not specifiedUSAlong-term care insuranceage; bequest motive; health status; marital status; number of dependents50–69whether purchased insurancequantitativesecondary dataLarge national databaselinear probability regression
Nosratnejad et al. (2016)not specifiedIranhealth insuranceage; marital status; number of dependents; public insurance expectationsnot specifiedwhether purchased insurancequantitativesecondary dataLarge national databaselogistic regression
Price et al. (2016)not specifiedUSAmedical insuranceage; cognitive abilities; health status; marital status65–80decision-making performancequantitativeexperiment23repeated measures analysis
Reid et al. (2016)not specifiedUSAmedical insuranceage60+purchase intentionquantitativesecondary dataLarge national databaseconditional logit regression
Ampaw et al. (2018)Insurance demand theoryGhanalife insuranceage; number of dependents; health status; marital statusnot specifiedwhether purchased insurancequantitativesecondary dataLarge national databaselogit regression
Sowa et al. (2018)not specifiedAustraliahealth insuranceagenot specifiedwillingness to payquantitativesecondary dataLarge national databasemicrosimulation approach
Wang et al. (2018)not specifiedChinalong-term care insuranceage; health status; marital statusnot specifiedwillingness to payquantitativequestionnaire survey1743 familiescontingent valuation method (bidding game); random-effects logistic regression
Aziz et al. (2019)Intention-behaviour theories (TPB, TRA); Commitment-trust theoryPakistanIslamic insurance (takaful)age; marital status24–50purchase intentionquantitativequestionnaire survey224PLS-SEM
Paton Schmidt (2019)Cue utilisation theoryUSAIslamic insurance (takaful)age; cognitive abilitiesaverage 38purchase intentionquantitativequestionnaire survey371correlation analysis; linear regression
Tolani et al. (2019)not specifiedUAEhealth insuranceage; risk perception; health status; marital statusnot specifiedwillingness to payquantitativesecondary dataLocal insurer databasedouble hurdle model; neural network
Dragos et al. (2020)Theory of Planned Behaviour (TPB)Romanialife insuranceage; marital status18–65whether purchased insurance; purchase intentionquantitativequestionnaire survey1579logit regression; multinomial logit regression
Ondruška et al. (2020)not specifiedSlovaklife insuranceage; marital status; number of dependents; saving behaviour18–62purchase intentionquantitativequestionnaire survey870binary logistic regression
Xu et al. (2020)not specifiedChinalong-term care insuranceage; marital status; number of dependents; saving behaviour; interpersonal influence; anticipated dependence45+purchase intentionquantitativequestionnaire survey3987multivariate logistic regression
Colón-Morales et al. (2021)not specifiedUSAhealth insuranceage; marital status; number of dependentsnot specifiedfrequency of using health insurancequantitativequestionnaire survey126Spearman’s correlation test
Eling et al. (2021)Prospect theory; Utility theoryEuropelife insurance, long-term care insuranceage; marital status; number of dependents; health status; life expectancy expectations; risk propensity; saving behaviour50+whether purchased insurancequantitativesecondary dataLarge international databasebinary logit model
Rizwan et al. (2021)Theory of Planned Behaviour (TPB)UAEIslamic insurance (takaful)agenot specifiedpurchase intentionquantitativequestionnaire survey300SEM
Tam et al. (2021)Situational Theory of Problem Solving; Theory of Planned Behaviour (TPB)Australiahealth insuranceage; health status18–30purchase intentionquantitativequestionnaire survey594SEM
Wang et al. (2021a)Random Utility TheoryChinalong-term care insuranceage; marital status; number of dependents; health status20–75purchase preferencequantitativequestionnaire survey1067discrete choice experiment (DCE)
Wang et al. (2021b)Insurance demand theoryChinahealth insuranceagenot specifiedpriority of insurance purchasequantitativesecondary dataLocal insurer databasemultinomial logit regression
Kai et al. (2021)Theory of peer effectsChinatravel insuranceage; cognitive age; risk perception; interpersonal influence65+purchase intentionquantitativequestionnaire survey1023logistic regression
Yeh et al. (2021)Expected utility theory (EUT); Prospect theoryChina (TW)long-term care insuranceage; marital status; number of dependents; risk propensity; health status; family insurance expectations (self-insurance)not specifiedwhether purchased insurance; purchase intentionquantitativequestionnaire survey1373multinomial logistic regression
Choe et al. (2022)not specifiedKoreatravel insuranceage; risk perception; number of dependentsnot specifiedwillingness to payquantitativequestionnaire survey470contingent valuation method (double-bounded dichotomous choice)
D. Li et al. (2022)Trust transfer theoryChinamedical insuranceage40+purchase intentionquantitativequestionnaire survey247PLS-SEM
He et al. (2023)not specifiedChina (HK)long-term care insuranceage; bequest motive; cognitive abilities; anticipated dependence; health status; number of dependents; marital status; family insurance expectations (self-insurance)50–59purchase intentionquantitativequestionnaire survey1105discrete choice experiment (DCE)
Wu and Gong (2023)FBM (Fuzzy Trace Theory); UTAUT (Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology)Chinalongevity annuity insuranceage; interpersonal influence; anticipated dependence; risk perception20–49purchase intentionquantitativequestionnaire survey462SEM
Table 3. Overview of future research directions and questions.
Table 3. Overview of future research directions and questions.
DirectionsResearch Questions Examples
Validating and Extending the AR Construct1. How can an ageing risks index be developed and validated to measure perceived financial and health uncertainties associated with societal ageing?
2. How do different dimensions of ageing risks (e.g., financial security, healthcare affordability, intergenerational dependency) uniquely influence insurance purchase intentions?
3. To what extent does exposure to ageing-related events (e.g., parental caregiving, retirement planning) influence individuals’ perceptions of ageing risks and subsequent insurance decisions?
Broadening Geographical and Insurance Product Diversity4. How do pension system differences across countries shape consumers’ reliance on private insurance for ageing-related financial security?
5. How do regulatory frameworks in emerging markets influence the accessibility and affordability of insurance products for ageing-related needs?
6. What role does cultural variation in intergenerational financial responsibility play in shaping demand for long-term care and life insurance?
Examining Non-Elderly Populations7. How do anticipated caregiving responsibilities influence young adults’ willingness to purchase long-term care or life insurance?
8. To what extent do financial concerns about ageing parents’ medical expenses affect middle-aged individuals’ insurance decisions?
9. How do workplace ageing policies and retirement expectations influence younger employees’ engagement with health and pension insurance?
Incorporating Mixed-Methods Approaches10. How do qualitative interviews with family caregivers reveal decision-making patterns that differ from survey-based findings on ageing and insurance?
11. How does experimental manipulation of risk communication about ageing-related financial insecurity affect insurance purchase intentions?
12. What insights can be gained from longitudinal studies tracking individuals’ insurance decisions as they age and experience shifts in financial and caregiving responsibilities?
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Bangaan Abdullah, M.H.-S.; Zheng, Z.; Zaki, H.O.; Tan, Q.L. The Impact of Societal Ageing on Individual Consumers’ Insurance Purchase Intentions: A Review and Research Agenda. Behav. Sci. 2026, 16, 143. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs16010143

AMA Style

Bangaan Abdullah MH-S, Zheng Z, Zaki HO, Tan QL. The Impact of Societal Ageing on Individual Consumers’ Insurance Purchase Intentions: A Review and Research Agenda. Behavioral Sciences. 2026; 16(1):143. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs16010143

Chicago/Turabian Style

Bangaan Abdullah, Mohd Hafizuddin-Syah, Zhangwei Zheng, Hafizah Omar Zaki, and Qin Lingda Tan. 2026. "The Impact of Societal Ageing on Individual Consumers’ Insurance Purchase Intentions: A Review and Research Agenda" Behavioral Sciences 16, no. 1: 143. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs16010143

APA Style

Bangaan Abdullah, M. H.-S., Zheng, Z., Zaki, H. O., & Tan, Q. L. (2026). The Impact of Societal Ageing on Individual Consumers’ Insurance Purchase Intentions: A Review and Research Agenda. Behavioral Sciences, 16(1), 143. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs16010143

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Article metric data becomes available approximately 24 hours after publication online.
Back to TopTop