1. Introduction
A stockout is defined as a state of product unavailability or a temporary mismatch between supply and demand for inventory items (
Hofstetter et al., 2014). It is a service failure phenomenon that may elicit strong negative consumer reactions. A survey on online shopping annoyances revealed that stockouts are the second most prevalent issue (
Breugelmans et al., 2006). Therefore, developing effective stockout recovery processes has become a critical challenge in online retail management. Product substitution has been proven as a key strategy to mitigate negative effects (
Hoang & Breugelmans, 2023). Recently, AI-recommended agents have emerged as a novel tool for service recovery. In contrast to conventional marketers offering generic alternatives, AI systems generate a unique set of substitutes tailored to heterogeneous individuals. Existing studies have demonstrated that AI recommender systems leverage robust learning, adaptation, and interactive technical capabilities to construct and refine hyper-personalized customer experiences, thereby enhancing click-through rates, value co-creation, and engagement behaviors.
Despite the extensive deployment of AI recommender systems, their efficacy as a recovery strategy for stockouts lacks robust theoretical grounding. Prior literature exhibits dual limitations in explaining this phenomenon. First, studies predominantly focus on traditional offline retail, lacking validation of the efficacy of AI agents as digital remedial tools. Recommender systems harness advanced algorithms to generate assortment sets that surpass traditional marketing approaches by providing unprecedented insight into and response to consumer behavior (
Teepapal, 2024). The AI-recommended items are shaped by the interplay of individual preferences, task context, and technical features (
Chakraborty et al., 2025). User preferences derived from both explicit data and implicit feedback are used to select substitutes that exhibit congruence with consumers’ tastes, colors, brands, or historical consumption experiences (
Raji et al., 2024). Our research aligns with another unresolved gap in the current literature: existing research emphasizes attribute fit between substitutes and out-of-stock products while overlooking the critical role of user-specific preference matching. In fact, consumers’ choice behaviors are driven by personalized factors including idiosyncratic preferences, individual values, and habitual behaviors (
Arens & Hamilton, 2018).
Second, the efficacy of substitution strategies constitutes a pivotal research direction in substitution studies (
Arens & Hamilton, 2018). Current research predominantly examines the impact of stockouts on consumers’ single purchase decisions through fine-grained analyses of substitutive attribute spaces, including categories, brands, and functionality, to pinpoint optimal substitutes for customer retention (
Khan & DePaoli, 2023).Yet, it rarely evaluates the long-term effects of substitutive recovery strategies, especially in pivotal strategic dimensions such as relationship rehabilitation and loyalty cultivation, while short-term profit maximization may undermine sustainable consumer value (
Matsuoka, 2022). Therefore, consumer satisfaction recovery and loyalty restoration are pivotal components in service recovery frameworks (
Zhu et al., 2024). Improper service recovery interventions will amplify initial service failure effects; conversely, the service recovery paradox holds that effective recovery strategies can compensate for service failures and convert dissatisfied customers into loyal advocates (
Nguyen & McColl-Kennedy, 2003). In particular, a 5% improvement in customer retention yields 25–85% profit growth (
Shamsudin et al., 2020).
To fill this gap, this research establishes a theoretical framework that integrates technological affordance theory and perceived value theory, conceptualizing the content affordances of AI recommendations as strategic recovery resources. The study provides pioneering insights into how AI-driven functional designs produce long-term recovery effects in out-of-stock substitution scenarios. Post-purchase intentions have been used to forecast consumers’ long-term economic and social behaviors in terms of consumers’ repurchasing intentions and word-of-mouth (WOM) following service recovery (
Mkedder et al., 2024). Yet, it is rarely used to evaluate the effectiveness of substitution strategies. In contrast to the short-term purchasing decisions, post-purchase intentions offer an effective way to assess the effect of service recovery strategies on enhancing customer experience and relationship and converting potential losses into opportunities to boost customer loyalty and satisfaction (
Ravula et al., 2022). Perceived value has been proven to be a critical antecedent of post- purchase intentions (
Kuo et al., 2009). As demonstrated in existing literature, the concept of perceived value is multidimensional. The value dimensions of utilitarian and hedonic encompass a wide range of specific types of values, describing consumers’ perceptions on the preset value proposition of service providers during interaction (
C.-Y. Li et al., 2023).
Meanwhile, affordance is a popular perspective in the field of information systems to examine digital technology innovation and its efficacy potential. It describes the relationship between “value in use” and the technical features that provide potential for specific goals (
S. I. Lei et al., 2019). Accordingly, as a content information service based on preset programs, the realized value of content design for AI-recommended alternatives hinges on consumers’ perceptions of the technology’s usefulness and how it can be used to achieve goals. Based on this discussion, this study delineates the causal pathway from the content affordances of AI recommender systems to post-purchase intentions through perceived value. Furthermore, distinct technological features exert varying impacts on consumer cognition and affect (
Hepola et al., 2020), hence, this study explores the differential effects of content affordances on perceived functional value and perceived emotional value. Additionally, we employ Necessary Condition Analysis (NCA) to reveal the necessary conditions for producing the expected effects to improve diagnostic ability.
In addition, the underlying mechanism of recommender systems inherently induces privacy concerns (
Y. Wang et al., 2024). Individuals’ perceptions of privacy disclosure risks or potential negative consequences significantly influence users’ decisions to adopt and continue using AI-driven services (
Cao & Wen, 2025). Current research demonstrates no consensus on the impact of privacy concerns on service adoption: Many studies suggest that privacy concerns inhibit consumer engagement with AI services, but paradoxically, others indicate a positive effect (
Awad & Krishnan, 2006). Although previous research acknowledges that privacy holds utilitarian value as foundational to human autonomy (
Introna, 1997), the crucial role of privacy concerns in shaping consumers’ platform switching behavior remains unexamined. Given that individuals with high and low levels of privacy concerns represent differences in cost–benefit tradeoffs (
Lavoye & Kumar, 2025), this study further discusses the moderating role of privacy concerns. The main findings are highly significant for platform retailers managing product stockouts in the presence of substitutes, contributing to improved product sales and inventory management policies.
The remainder of this paper is structured as follows. First, we provide a review of substitution for out-of-stock, technology affordance and perceived value theory. Second, we present a theoretical framework and a set of testable hypotheses. Third, we detail the methods and data analysis results. Finally, we discuss the findings, implications, limits, and future research directions.
5. Discussion and Implications
5.1. Main Findings
Despite the exponential growth of AI algorithm recommendations across industries, their economic impact and underlying mechanisms in out-of-stock substitution scenarios remain inadequately explored. Drawing on the Affordance Theory and Perceived Value Theory, this study examines how the content affordances of AI recommendations shape customer value perceptions and post-purchase intentions. PLS-SEM and NCA methods are integrated to examine both sufficient and necessary conditions, thereby enhancing causal understanding of structural relationships within the proposed framework.
First, the PLS-SEM results demonstrate that the content affordances of perceived fit, perceived personalization, and perceived serendipity are key antecedents of consumer perceived value. Specifically, the feature alignment between a substitute and the preferred product reflects a deep-level task-technology fit. Perceived personalization fosters self-congruity with the substitute, while perceived serendipity introduces valuable discovery by offering unexpected alternatives that are consistent with consumers’ latent preferences. Collectively, these affordances give rise to both perceived functional and emotional value. Furthermore, this study reveals the differential effects of technological characteristics on distinct consumer value dimensions. Perceived fit has a stronger impact on consumers’ perceived functional value, whereas perceived personalization exerts a greater influence on perceived emotional value. In contrast, perceived serendipity exhibits no significant differential effects between functional and emotional values. These findings validate the perspectives proposed by
Alnawas et al. (
2023) and
Hepola et al. (
2020): utilitarian elements of applications or products prompt consumers to evaluate instrumental benefits, while hedonic attributes exert a more pronounced influence on affective responses than cognitive assessments.
Second, this study employs post-purchase intentions to assess the long-term efficacy of service recovery. The results demonstrate that consumers’ perceived functional and emotional values derived from AI-recommended substitutes predict behavioral intentions such as repeat purchases and positive WOM. Previous studies have revealed the positive effects of consumers’ perceived value on repurchase, recommendation, and continuance intention in various contexts including hospitality services, chatbots, online gaming, and VR services. Our results are in line with these findings. When users perceive utilitarian benefits from alternative assortments or experience hedonic enjoyment, they develop heightened behavioral loyalty and affective commitment toward the original platform.
Third, the results reveal that privacy concerns positively moderate the relationship between perceived functional value and consumers’ post-purchase intentions. Privacy- sensitive users exhibit reinforced loyalty to the original platform following an effective functional recovery. In contrast, privacy concerns do not significantly moderate the relationship between perceived emotional value and purchase decisions. Thus, H9b is not supported. This may be explained through two distinct value pathways. In the functional value pathway, consumers’ perception of substantive utilitarian benefits activates cost–benefit calculations. Users with high privacy concerns, given their risk-averse nature, may strengthen their dependency on the original platform, resulting in enhanced loyalty and repurchase intentions. Within the emotional value pathway, high levels of emotional value (e.g., surprise, feeling understood) effectively alleviate negative emotions triggered by stockouts, serving as a powerful form of affective compensation and emotional support, which reinforces users’ affective trust and relational commitment toward the platform (
C. Zhou & Chang, 2024). According to social exchange theory, a long-term reciprocal and affect-laden relational paradigm motivates users to maintain stable existing relationships (
Can Saglam et al., 2022), leading to greater tolerance toward temporary platform failures (e.g., stockouts), lower switching intentions, and reduced perception of platform opportunism (
Fang et al., 2024). Consequently, the moderating effect of privacy concerns is rendered insignificant.
In addition, NCA demonstrates that both perceived functional value and emotional value are necessary conditions for post-purchase intentions. The analysis shows that AI- recommended substitute sets must be efficient, useful, and practical to deliver functional benefits, while simultaneously evoking positive affective experiences that drive repeat purchases and positive WOM. Moreover, perceived fit constitutes a key determinant for functional value, making the offering of similar substitutes during stockouts essential. Meanwhile, perceived fit, personalization, and serendipity are critical determinants of perceived emotional value, which requires that recommended substitutes should match consumer preferences, fulfill expectations, and provide unexpected valuable information to enhance consumers’ emotional value perceptions.
5.2. Theoretical Implications
Our study makes a significant original contribution to the literature on substitute recovery in out-of-stock scenarios. First, although AI recommender systems are widely implemented in stockout contexts, few studies have examined how AI-recommended substitute sets yield economic benefits. Moreover, prior studies have primarily focused on the short-term impacts of conventional recovery measures (e.g., product upgrades, apologies, and compensation) from perspectives like contextual effects, stockout cues, and product attributes. In contrast, this study validates AI-recommended substitutes as a potent service recovery mechanism. By identifying three crucial content features of AI-recommended substitutes—perceived fit, perceived personalization, and perceived serendipity—our findings reveal the pivotal role of AI substitution strategies in shaping long-term customer relationships (e.g., repeat purchases and positive WOM), thereby extending the theoretical perspectives of stockout recovery and technology affordance.
Second, this study examines the underlying mechanisms through which content affordances influence consumers’ post-purchase intentions. Previous service recovery frameworks have emphasized the critical role of fairness and justice (
Song et al., 2024), but their explanatory power is limited in AI-driven contexts (
S. Li et al., 2025). This study introduces perceived value as a pivotal mediator to construct a dual-pathway model. Grounded in the premise that consumers’ attitudes toward AI technology determine the successful delivery of a company’s value propositions (
S. I. Lei et al., 2019), our findings reveal that AI-recommended substitutes serve as an effective economic recovery strategy, wherein content affordances simultaneously trigger perceptions of functional value and emotional value, thereby directly driving post-recovery repurchase intentions and WOM. Furthermore, the results show the differential effects of content affordance dimensions on two value pathways: perceived fit primarily shapes functional value, whereas perceived personalization predominantly influences emotional value, indicating that the alignment among AI recovery strategies, stockout incidents, and individual needs significantly enhances perceived value (e.g., “task-technology fit” and “self-technology fit”). The results advance the theoretical framework of AI-driven service recovery and deepen the understanding of value formation mechanisms in human-AI interaction.
Third, our study reveals that privacy concerns positively moderate the relationship between perceived functional value and consumers’ post-purchase intentions. Previous research has suggested that privacy concerns represent a negative technology affordance that diminishes outcome valences (
Pizzi et al., 2022), undermining consumers’ adoption intention, continuance usage, and recommendation intention (
Lavoye & Kumar, 2025). However, existing research has not explored platform switching under service failure contexts, particularly when users derive significant functional value from a platform’s technological support. From the lens of social exchange theory, we identify a positive moderating effect of privacy concerns. Specifically, consumers’ perceived utilitarian value in service recovery emerges as a key prerequisite for accepting privacy costs. When users with higher privacy concerns perceive functional benefits from the original platform’s service recovery, a rational cost–benefit calculus motivates them to maintain the existing relationship, manifesting as stronger loyalty and repurchase intentions. Research on switching costs also confirms that customers’ loss aversion positively affects retention, advancing theories of privacy concerns and disclosure (
Kim & Kim, 2024).
5.3. Managerial Implications
This study provides a solid theoretical and methodological foundation to guide platform operators in designing recommendation algorithms and strategies for out-of-stock substitution. First, it validates AI-recommended substitutes as an effective proactive service recovery strategy. Although most platforms leverage AI recommender systems to mitigate the negative impacts of stockouts, significant variation exists in the design of their choice sets’ content features, particularly in balancing relevance and diversity/serendipity. Our findings indicate that alternative sets integrating fit, personalization, and serendipity help build stronger long-term customer relationships. Specifically, algorithms should recommend substitutes with high functional alignment to meet rational problem-solving needs, while also providing personalized and serendipitous options to evoke emotional value. According to the service recovery paradox, a successful recovery from service failures can yield higher consumer satisfaction levels than before the incident occurred.
Second, the results indicate that perceived serendipity is a necessary condition for consumers’ value perception, with unexpectedly delightful recommendations for driving service recovery effectiveness. Therefore, by proactively identifying and responding to latent consumer preferences through unexpectedly fitting stockout alternatives, platforms can strengthen value perception and service identification, thereby cultivating long-term loyalty. However, the potential risks of “excessive serendipity” must be acknowledged. For instance, over-recommending alternatives that deviate from users’ explicit preferences may undermine the perceived reliability of the AI -driven system and breed skepticism about its intentions. Moreover, excessive serendipity can induce cognitive conflict and choice overload, potentially leading to purchase abandonment (
Wu et al., 2024). Therefore, platform managers should strive to balance recommendation accuracy with exploratory shopping, first ensuring that substitutes satisfy core functional needs before introducing moderately surprising options.
Third, this study reveals individual heterogeneity in privacy concerns during AI- driven service recovery. Privacy concerns positively moderate the effect of perceived functional value on post-purchase intentions. Notably, consumers with higher privacy sensitivity demonstrate stronger loyalty to the original platform following an effective recovery. Consequently, platforms should increase investments in AI infrastructure and algorithmic R&D to enhance the quality and utility of recommendations. By delivering superior value that outweighs the costs of consumers’ privacy disclosure, platforms can convert highly privacy-conscious users into their most stable customer base. Moreover, platforms should establish a transparent and controllable data environment. For instance, they should clearly explain to consumers the logic of data collection, usage, and protection, as well as provide privacy protection tools that enhance user data access and control. Ultimately, these approaches cultivate the privacy literacy and empowerment among consumers to internalize privacy concerns as a switching cost, thereby strengthening competitive barriers and ensuring sustainable customer loyalty.
6. Limitations and Future Research
This study has several limitations that suggest potential avenues for future research. First, AI recommender systems possess multiple dimensions of technology affordance; this study focused solely on the impacts of content affordance and privacy concerns on consumers’ post-purchase intentions in out-of-stock scenarios. Previous research has confirmed that technical features such as the explainability, interactivity, and information presentation of AI recommender systems influence an individual’s understanding of the recommendation logic. The perceived transparency and algorithmic fairness may shape consumers’ value perception and subsequent behaviors. Therefore, future studies should explore other technical dimensions or adopt an integrated framework to evaluate the efficacy of AI-enabled service recovery. Additionally, situational cues, including the functional or hedonic attributes of products, product involvement, and causes of stockouts, also influence consumers’ processing of stock-out information. Future research should also investigate the boundary conditions for the efficacy of AI-driven substitution recovery strategies.
Second, this study establishes a dual-pathway recovery framework focusing on the perspective of perceived value. Future work should incorporate diverse theoretical lenses to further investigate the psychological mechanisms underlying consumer responses to AI-driven recovery. For instance, it could explore whether emotional value fosters WOM through affective trust, or whether the efficacy of functional value is contingent upon perceived fairness. Such efforts would contribute to constructing a more comprehensive and nuanced causal pathway from AI service features to user behavior.
Third, the reliance on self-reported data in this study may constrain the external validity of the main findings. Future research could employ laboratory experiments, field experiments, or analyses of real-world behavioral data to strengthen external validity. Furthermore, since our research was conducted in China, cultural factors pertaining to privacy and relationships may limit the generalizability of the model. Cross-cultural comparisons and extensions to diverse contexts are needed to validate these findings and enhance their robustness.