The Effect of Emotional Congruency on Multimedia Learning: An Eye Movement Study
Abstract
1. Introduction
- (1)
- In terms of learning outcomes, learners in the congruent condition would perform better than those in the incongruent condition on both retention and transfer tests.
- (2)
- Regarding subjective perception, learners in the congruent condition would show higher intrinsic motivation, lower perceived difficulty and lower mental effort than those in the incongruent condition.
- (3)
- In terms of eye movement measures, fixation duration, fixation count and the number of transitions on the learning material would be less in the congruent condition than in the incongruent condition.
2. Experiment 1: The Impact of Emotional Congruency on Positive Learning Material
2.1. Methods
2.1.1. Participants
2.1.2. Experimental Design
2.1.3. Learning Materials
2.1.4. Assessment Instruments
2.1.5. Eye Movement Indices
2.1.6. Experimental Procedure
2.2. Results
2.2.1. Emotional Induction
2.2.2. Learning Outcomes
2.2.3. Subjective Perception
2.2.4. Eye Movement Indices
2.3. Discussion
3. Experiment 2: The Impact of Emotional Congruency on Negative Learning Material
3.1. Methods
3.1.1. Participants
3.1.2. Experimental Design
3.1.3. Learning Materials
3.1.4. Assessment Instruments
3.1.5. Eye Movement Indices
3.1.6. Experimental Procedure
3.2. Results
3.2.1. Emotional Induction
3.2.2. Learning Outcomes
3.2.3. Subjective Perception
3.2.4. Eye Movement Indices
3.3. Discussion
4. General Discussion
4.1. The Influence of Emotional Congruency on Multimedia Learning Outcomes
4.2. The Influence of Emotional Congruency on Eye Movement
4.3. The Influence of Emotional Congruency on Subjective Perception
5. Limitations and Future Directions
6. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Almeida, L. M. C. G., Münzer, S., & Kühl, T. (2024). More personal, but not better: The personalization effect in learning neutral and aversive health information. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 40(5), 2248–2260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Atkinson, R. K. (2002). Optimizing learning from examples using animated pedagogical agents. Journal of Educational Psychology, 94(2), 416–427. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bates, D., Maechler, M., Bolker, B., & Walker, S. (2015). Fitting linear mixed-effects models using LME4. Journal of Statistical Software, 67(1), 1–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Beege, M., Schneider, S., Nebel, S., Häßler, A., & Rey, G. D. (2018). Mood-affect congruency. Exploring the relation between learners’ mood and the affective charge of educational videos. Computers & Education, 123, 85–96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bower, G. H. (1978). Experiments on story comprehension and recall. Discourse Processes, 1(3), 211–231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bower, G. H. (1981). Mood and memory. American Psychologist, 36(2), 129–148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Brom, C., Starkova, T., & D’Mello, S. K. (2018). How effective is emotional design? A meta-analysis on facial anthropomorphisms and pleasant colors during multimedia learning. Educational Research Review, 25, 100–119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chandler, C. C. (1991). How memory for an event is influenced by related events: Interference in modified recognition tests. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 17(1), 115–125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chung, S., & Cheon, J. (2020). Emotional design of multimedia learning using background images with motivational cues. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 36(6), 922–932. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fang, S., Zhu, Z., Tang, Z., Jin, Y., Wang, Y., & Peng, X. (2024, July 29–August 1). The effects of positive emotional design on learning outcomes in multimedia learning: A meta-analysis. 2024 International Symposium on Educational Technology (ISET) (pp. 127–131), Macao, China. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Feng, Y. (2020). The effect of personalization principle on multimedia learning-an eye-tracking study. Shandong Normal University. [Google Scholar]
- Forgas, J. P. (1995). Mood and judgment: The affect infusion model (AIM). Psychological Bulletin, 117(1), 39–66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Forgas, J. P., & George, J. M. (2001). Affective influences on judgments and behavior in organizations: An information processing perspective. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 86(1), 3–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fredrickson, B. L. (2001). The role of positive emotions in positive psychology: The broaden-and-build theory of positive emotions. American Psychologist, 56(3), 218–226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Genc Aksaray, S., & Ozcelik, E. (2023). Attention mediates the effect of emotional arousal on learning outcomes in multimedia learning: An eye-tracking study. Educational Psychology, 43(1), 38–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gong, S. Y., Shangguan, C. Y., Zhai, K. H., & Guo, Y. W. (2017). The effects of emotional design on multimedia learning. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 49(6), 771–782. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Heidig, S., Müller, J., & Reichelt, M. (2015). Emotional design in multimedia learning: Differentiation on relevant design features and their effects on emotions and learning. Computers in Human Behavior, 44, 81–95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Horovitz, T., & Mayer, R. E. (2021). Learning with human and virtual instructors who display happy or bored emotions in video lectures. Computers in Human Behavior, 119, 106724. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Huang, W., Roscoe, R. D., Craig, S. D., & Johnson-Glenberg, M. C. (2022). Extending the cognitive-affective theory of learning with media in virtual reality learning: A structural equation modeling approach. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 60(4), 807–842. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hyönä, J., Heikkilä, T. T., Vainio, S., & Kliegl, R. (2021). Parafoveal access to word stem during reading: An eye movement study. Cognition, 208, 104547. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Isen, A. M., & Reeve, J. (2005). The influence of positive affect on intrinsic and extrinsic motivation: Facilitating enjoyment of play, responsible work behavior, and self-control. Motivation and Emotion, 29(4), 295–323. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Knörzer, L., Brünken, R., & Park, B. (2016). Facilitators or suppressors: Effects of experimentally induced emotions on multimedia learning. Learning and Instruction, 44, 97–107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Koçoğlu, K., Akdal, G., Dönmez Çolakoğlu, B., Çakmur, R., Sharma, J. C., Ezard, G., Hermens, F., & Hodgson, T. L. (2021). The effect of directional social cues on saccadic eye movements in Parkinson’s disease. Experimental Brain Research, 239(7), 2063–2075. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Leppink, J., & Duvivier, R. (2016). Twelve tips for medical curriculum design from a cognitive load theory perspective. Medical Teacher, 38(7), 669–674. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, H., & Zheng, Y. (2024). Can gesture tracking promote multimedia learning? A meta-analysis study. Advances in Psychology, 14, 911. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, W., Wang, F., & Mayer, R. E. (2024). Increasing the realism of on-screen embodied instructors creates more looking but less learning. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 94(3), 759–776. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liew, T. W., Pang, W. M., Leow, M. C., & Tan, S. M. (2022). Anthropomorphizing malware, bots, and servers with human-like images and dialogues: The emotional design effects in a multimedia learning environment. Smart Learning Environments, 9(1), 5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Linnenbrink-Garcia, L., & Pekrun, R. (2011). Students’ emotions and academic engagement: Introduction to the special issue. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 36(1), 1–3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, X., & Cui, Y. (2025). Eye tracking technology for examining cognitive processes in education: A systematic review. Computers & Education, 229, 105263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Manor, B. R., & Gordon, E. (2003). Defining the temporal threshold for ocular fixation in free-viewing visuocognitive tasks. Journal of Neuroscience Methods, 128(1–2), 85–93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mayer, R. E. (Ed.). (2005). The Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning. Cambridge University Press. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mayer, R. E. (2014). Incorporating motivation into multimedia learning. Learning and Instruction, 29, 171–173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mayer, R. E., & Estrella, G. (2014). Benefit of emotional design in multimedia instruction. Learning and Instruction, 33, 12–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mayer, R. E., Heiser, H., & Lonn, S. (2001). Cognitive constraints on multimedia learning: When presenting more material results in less understanding. Journal of Educational Psychology, 93, 187–198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mayer, R. E., Lee, H., & Peebles, A. (2014). Multimedia learning in a second language: A cognitive load perspective. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 28(5), 653–660. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mayer, R. E., & Moreno, R. (2003). Nine ways to reduce cognitive load in multimedia learning. Educational Psychologist, 38(1), 43–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mei, Z. H., & Lu, J. M. (2014). The empirical study of emotion-congruent effect in classroom lead-in. Research on Modern Basic Education, 13, 83–89. [Google Scholar]
- Moreno, R. (2006). Does the modality principle hold for different media? A test of the method-affects-learning hypothesis. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 22(3), 149–158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mutlu-Bayraktar, D. (2024). A systematic review of emotional design research in multimedia learning. Education and Information Technologies, 29(18), 24603–24626. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Navratil, S. D., Kühl, T., & Heidig, S. (2018). Why the cells look like that–the influence of learning with emotional design and elaborative interrogations. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 1653. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Paas, F. G. (1992). Training strategies for attaining transfer of problem-solving skill in statistics: A cognitive-load approach. Journal of Educational Psychology, 84(4), 429–434. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Park, B., Knörzer, L., Plass, J. L., & Brünken, R. (2015). Emotional design and positive emotions in multimedia learning: An eye tracking study on the use of anthropomorphisms. Computers & Education, 86, 30–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Park, B., Plass, J. L., & Brünken, R. (2014). Cognitive and affective processes in multimedia learning. Learning and Instruction, 29, 125–127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Peng, X., Xu, Q. M., Chen, Y. F., Zhou, C. Y., Ge, Y. Q., & Li, N. (2021). An eye tracking study: Positive emotional interface design facilitates learning outcomes in multimedia learning? International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 18(1), 40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Pi, Z., Chen, M., Zhu, F., Yang, J., & Hu, W. (2022). Modulation of instructor’s eye gaze by facial expression in video lectures. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 59(1), 15–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pi, Z. L., Liu, W., Ling, H. J., Zhang, X. Y., & Li, X. Y. (2023). Does an instructor’s facial expressions override their body gestures in video lectures? Computers & Education, 193, 104679. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Plass, J. L., Heidig, S., Hayward, E. O., Homer, B. D., & Um, E. (2014). Emotional design in multimedia learning: Effects of shape and color on affect and learning. Learning and Instruction, 29, 128–140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Plass, J. L., & Hovey, C. (2021). The emotional design principle in multimedia learning. In R. E. Mayer, & L. Fiorella (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning (pp. 324–336). Cambridge University Press. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Plass, J. L., & Kaplan, U. (2016). Emotional design in digital media for learning. In S. Tettegah, & M. Gartmeier (Eds.), Emotions, technology, design, and learning (pp. 131–161). Elsevier. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Qiu, L., Zheng, X., & Wang, Y. F. (2008). Revision of the positive affect and negative affect scale (PANAS). Chinese Journal of Applied Psychology, 14(3), 249–254. [Google Scholar]
- Rayner, K. (1998). Eye movements in reading and information processing: 20 years of research. Psychological Bulletin, 124(3), 372–422. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Russel, J. A. (1980). A circumplex model of affect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39(6), 1161–1178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55(1), 68–78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Schneider, S., Beege, M., Nebel, S., Schnaubert, L., & Rey, G. D. (2022). The cognitive-affective-social theory of learning in digital environments (CASTLE). Educational Psychology Review, 34(1), 1–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sondermann, C., Huff, M., & Merkt, M. (2024). Distracted by a talking head? An eye tracking study on the effects of instructor presence in learning videos with animated graphic slides. Learning and Instruction, 91, 101878. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Stadthagen-Gonzalez, H., Imbault, C., Pérez Sánchez, M. A., & Brysbaert, M. (2017). Norms of valence and arousal for 14,031 Spanish words. Behavior Research Methods, 49(1), 111–123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Stark, L., Brünken, R., & Park, B. (2018). Emotional text design in multimedia learning: A mixed-methods study using eye tracking. Computers & Education, 120, 185–196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Stark, L., Korbach, A., Brünken, R., & Park, B. (2024). Measuring (meta) cognitive processes in multimedia learning: Matching eye tracking metrics and think-aloud protocols in case of seductive details. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 40(6), 2985–3004. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sweller, J., Ayres, P., & Kalyuga, S. (2011). Cognitive load theory. Springer Science & Business Media. [Google Scholar]
- Um, E., Plass, J. L., Hayward, E. O., & Homer, B. D. (2012). Emotional design in multimedia learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 104(2), 485–498. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, Y., Gong, S., Cao, Y., & Fan, W. (2023). The power of affective pedagogical agent and self-explanation in computer-based learning. Computers & Education, 195, 104723. [Google Scholar]
- Watson, D., Clark, L. A., & Tellegen, A. (1988). Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: The PANAS scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54(6), 1063–1070. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wong, R. M., & Adesope, O. O. (2021). Meta-analysis of emotional designs in multimedia learning: A replication and extension study. Educational Psychology Review, 33(2), 357–385. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xu, H. (2017). The effect of positive and negative emotions on multimedia learning. Zhejiang University of Technology. [Google Scholar]
- Xue, Y., Wang, F. X., Zhou, Z. K., & Cai, H. (2015). The emotional design in multimedia learning: The role of learner experience. Psychological Research, 1, 78–84. [Google Scholar]
- Yang, J., Wu, C., Liu, C., Zhang, Y., & Pi, Z. (2023). Personalization and pauses in speech: Children’s learning performance via instructional videos. Current Psychology, 42(27), 23687–23697. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, C., Wang, Z., Fang, Z., & Xiao, X. (2024). Guiding student learning in video lectures: Effects of instructors’ emotional expressions and visual cues. Computers & Education, 218, 105062. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhao, F., & Mayer, R. E. (2023). Benefits of turning the illustrations in a narrated slideshow into cartoons: An extension of the positivity principle. Learning and Instruction, 86, 101779. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhao, F., & Mayer, R. E. (2025). Improving multimedia learning with emotional design. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 41(3), e70028. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhu, F., Mou, Z. J., Liu, C., Pi, Z., & Yang, J. (2025). Student gender moderates the effect of teacher facial expressions on attention but not learning: Evidence from an eye-tracking study. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 2025, 1–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Measurement Variables | Congruent M (SD) | Incongruent M (SD) | |
---|---|---|---|
Pre-test | |||
Positive emotion | 30.30 (7.07) | 31.15 (6.67) | |
Negative emotion | 14.24 (4.66) | 11.90 (3.99) | |
Post-test | |||
Positive emotion | 32.70 (7.92) | 27.55 (7.68) | |
Negative emotion | 12.35 (4.00) | 12.25 (3.84) |
Measurement Variables | Congruent | Incongruent |
---|---|---|
M (SD) | M (SD) | |
Retention performance | 3.80 (1.06) | 3.05 (1.15) |
Transfer performance | 12.25 (3.78) | 9.15 (2.83) |
Measurement Variables | Congruent | Incongruent |
---|---|---|
M (SD) | M (SD) | |
Intrinsic motivation | 5.64 (1.07) | 5.26 (1.41) |
Perceived difficulty | 4.40 (0.35) | 5.20 (0.35) |
Mental effort | 6.00 (1.81) | 6.10 (1.17) |
Dependent Variables | Congruent M (SD) | Incongruent M (SD) |
---|---|---|
Fixation duration (ms) | ||
Text area | 11,582 (5952) | 14,578 (7944) |
Picture area | 2750 (2950) | 3590 (3234) |
Fixation count | ||
Text area | 52.04 (26.76) | 66.55 (35.55) |
Picture area | 11.83 (11.42) | 14.97 (11.63) |
Number of transitions | ||
Picture area | 3.64 (2.57) | 4.81 (3.26) |
Measurement Variables | Congruent | Incongruent | |
---|---|---|---|
M (SD) | M (SD) | ||
Pre-test | |||
Positive emotion | 31.75 (6.52) | 30.40 (6.11) | |
Negative emotion | 12.30 (4.78) | 15.25 (5.93) | |
Post-test | |||
Positive emotion | 26.80 (8.34) | 30.10 (4.66) | |
Negative emotion | 15.55 (9.42) | 14.00 (4.41) |
Measurement Variables | Congruent | Incongruent |
---|---|---|
M (SD) | M (SD) | |
Retention performance | 4.10 (1.07) | 3.25 (1.61) |
Transfer performance | 12.75 (4.89) | 9.10 (4.84) |
Measurement Variables | Congruent | Incongruent |
---|---|---|
M (SD) | M (SD) | |
Intrinsic motivation | 4.63 (1.42) | 4.88 (1.07) |
Perceived difficulty | 5.45 (1.43) | 5.35 (1.84) |
Mental effort | 6.35 (1.60) | 6.80 (1.40) |
Dependent Variables | Congruent M (SD) | Incongruent M (SD) |
---|---|---|
Fixation duration (ms) | ||
Text area | 11,496 (7331) | 11,806 (7268) |
Picture area | 1644 (1866) | 2391 (2802) |
Fixation count | ||
Text area | 53.28 (31.94) | 53.96 (31.13) |
Picture area | 7.07 (8.58) | 10.88 (11.91) |
Number of transitions | ||
Picture area | 3.98 (2.99) | 5.00 (3.38) |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2025 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Cui, L.; Zheng, Y.; Song, X.; Wang, J.; Liu, C.; Wang, Z.; Zhang, X.; Wang, T. The Effect of Emotional Congruency on Multimedia Learning: An Eye Movement Study. Behav. Sci. 2025, 15, 1330. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs15101330
Cui L, Zheng Y, Song X, Wang J, Liu C, Wang Z, Zhang X, Wang T. The Effect of Emotional Congruency on Multimedia Learning: An Eye Movement Study. Behavioral Sciences. 2025; 15(10):1330. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs15101330
Chicago/Turabian StyleCui, Lei, Yuwei Zheng, Xiaoyu Song, Junfei Wang, Chengwei Liu, Ziyi Wang, Xiaofeng Zhang, and Tingzhen Wang. 2025. "The Effect of Emotional Congruency on Multimedia Learning: An Eye Movement Study" Behavioral Sciences 15, no. 10: 1330. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs15101330
APA StyleCui, L., Zheng, Y., Song, X., Wang, J., Liu, C., Wang, Z., Zhang, X., & Wang, T. (2025). The Effect of Emotional Congruency on Multimedia Learning: An Eye Movement Study. Behavioral Sciences, 15(10), 1330. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs15101330