Next Article in Journal
The Influence of Personality Type D and Coping Strategies on Cognitive Functioning in Students
Next Article in Special Issue
Closing the Gap: How Psychological Distance Influences Willingness to Engage in Risky COVID Behavior
Previous Article in Journal
Developmental Profile in Children Aged 3–6 Years: Down Syndrome vs. Autism Spectrum Disorder
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Evaluating Two Brief Motivational Interventions for Excessive-Drinking University Students

1
North Wales Clinical Psychology Programme, Bangor University, Bangor LL57 2DG, UK
2
Substance Misuse Services, Betsi Cadwaladr University Health Board, Rhyl LL18 3EY, UK
3
School of Psychology and Sport Sciences, Bangor University, Bangor LL57 2DG, UK
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Behav. Sci. 2024, 14(5), 381; https://doi.org/10.3390/bs14050381
Submission received: 3 March 2024 / Revised: 29 April 2024 / Accepted: 30 April 2024 / Published: 1 May 2024
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Promoting Behavioral Change to Improve Health Outcomes)

Abstract

Objective: Two brief computerized motivational interventions for excessive-drinking university students were evaluated. Method: Participants (N = 88, females = 61.5%, mean age = 21.05 years) were randomly assigned to a control group or one of two experimental groups: Computerized Brief Intervention (CBI) or Computerized Brief Intervention-Enhanced (CBI-E). CBI followed the principles of Motivational Interviewing to motivate participants to change their drinking behavior. CBI-E additionally used the principles of Systematic Motivational Counseling to identify and discuss with participants their dysfunctional motivational patterns that were interfering with their attainment of emotional satisfaction. At baseline and a three-month follow-up, the participants completed a battery of measures of alcohol consumption and related problems. Results: At baseline, the participants were confirmed to be heavy drinkers with many drink-related negative consequences. Males and females responded differently to the interventions. During follow-up, males’ alcohol use was ordered: CBI-E < CBI < Controls. The females in all three groups reduced their alcohol use, but there were no significant group differences. Conclusions: Males responded to the interventions as expected. For females, the assessment itself seemed to serve as an effective intervention, and there were no post-intervention differences among the three groups. Suggestions for future research using CBI and CBI-E are discussed.
Keywords: alcohol consumption; computerized brief intervention; gender difference; motivation; university students alcohol consumption; computerized brief intervention; gender difference; motivation; university students

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Hogan, L.M.; Cox, W.M. Evaluating Two Brief Motivational Interventions for Excessive-Drinking University Students. Behav. Sci. 2024, 14, 381. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs14050381

AMA Style

Hogan LM, Cox WM. Evaluating Two Brief Motivational Interventions for Excessive-Drinking University Students. Behavioral Sciences. 2024; 14(5):381. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs14050381

Chicago/Turabian Style

Hogan, Lee M., and W. Miles Cox. 2024. "Evaluating Two Brief Motivational Interventions for Excessive-Drinking University Students" Behavioral Sciences 14, no. 5: 381. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs14050381

APA Style

Hogan, L. M., & Cox, W. M. (2024). Evaluating Two Brief Motivational Interventions for Excessive-Drinking University Students. Behavioral Sciences, 14(5), 381. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs14050381

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop