Next Article in Journal
Native and Non-Native Speakers’ Recognition of Chinese Two-Character Words in Audio Sentence Comprehension
Previous Article in Journal
The Moderating Role of Gender and Mediating Role of Hope in the Performance of Healthcare Workers During the COVID-19 Pandemic
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Emotional Evaluations from Partners and Opponents Differentially Influence the Perception of Ambiguous Faces

1
Research Center of Brain and Cognitive Neuroscience, Liaoning Normal University, Dalian 116029, China
2
Key Laboratory of Brain and Cognitive Neuroscience, Liaoning Province, Dalian 116029, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Behav. Sci. 2024, 14(12), 1168; https://doi.org/10.3390/bs14121168
Submission received: 17 October 2024 / Revised: 1 December 2024 / Accepted: 3 December 2024 / Published: 5 December 2024

Abstract

The influence of contextual valence and interpersonal distance on facial expression perception remains unclear despite their significant role in shaping social perceptions. In this event-related potential (ERP) study, we investigated the temporal dynamics underlying the processing of surprised faces across different interpersonal distances (partner, opponent, or stranger) and contextual valence (positive, neutral, or negative) contexts. Thirty-five participants rated the valence of surprised faces. An advanced mass univariate statistical approach was utilized to analyze the ERP data. Behaviorally, surprised faces in partner-related negative contexts were rated more negatively than those in opponent- and stranger-related contexts. The ERP results revealed an increased P1 amplitude for surprised faces in negative relative to neutral contexts. Both the early posterior negativity (EPN) and late positive potentials (LPP) were also modulated by contextual valence, with larger amplitudes for faces in positive relative to neutral and negative contexts. Additionally, when compared to stranger-related contexts, faces in partner-related contexts exhibited enhanced P1 and EPN responses, while those in opponent-related contexts showed amplified LPP responses. Taken together, these findings elucidate the modulation of intricate social contexts on the perception and interpretation of ambiguous facial expressions, thereby enhancing our understanding of nonverbal communication and emotional cognition.
Keywords: contextual valence; interpersonal distance; surprised face; mass univariate statistics; ERPs contextual valence; interpersonal distance; surprised face; mass univariate statistics; ERPs

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Ran, D.; Zhang, Y.; Hao, B.; Li, S. Emotional Evaluations from Partners and Opponents Differentially Influence the Perception of Ambiguous Faces. Behav. Sci. 2024, 14, 1168. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs14121168

AMA Style

Ran D, Zhang Y, Hao B, Li S. Emotional Evaluations from Partners and Opponents Differentially Influence the Perception of Ambiguous Faces. Behavioral Sciences. 2024; 14(12):1168. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs14121168

Chicago/Turabian Style

Ran, Danyang, Yihan Zhang, Bin Hao, and Shuaixia Li. 2024. "Emotional Evaluations from Partners and Opponents Differentially Influence the Perception of Ambiguous Faces" Behavioral Sciences 14, no. 12: 1168. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs14121168

APA Style

Ran, D., Zhang, Y., Hao, B., & Li, S. (2024). Emotional Evaluations from Partners and Opponents Differentially Influence the Perception of Ambiguous Faces. Behavioral Sciences, 14(12), 1168. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs14121168

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop