Next Article in Journal
Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis: Epidemiology, Natural History, Phenotypes
Next Article in Special Issue
Development of a Low-Cost Wireless Phonocardiograph With a Bluetooth Headset under Resource-Limited Conditions
Previous Article in Journal
Differential Expression of Tissue Transglutaminase Splice Variants in Peripheral Blood Mononuclear Cells of Primary Progressive Multiple Sclerosis Patients
Article Menu
Issue 4 (December) cover image

Export Article

Open AccessPerspective
Med. Sci. 2018, 6(4), 109; https://doi.org/10.3390/medsci6040109

From Rapid Recommendation to Online Preference-Sensitive Decision Support: The Case of Severe Aortic Stenosis

1
Department of Public Health, Environments and Society, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, 15-17 Tavistock Place, London WC1H 9SH, UK
2
Department of Public Health, University of Southern Denmark, J.B. Winsløws Vej 9B, 5000 Odense C, Denmark
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Received: 7 September 2018 / Revised: 22 November 2018 / Accepted: 27 November 2018 / Published: 29 November 2018
(This article belongs to the Special Issue e-Health in Cardiovascular Medicine)
Full-Text   |   PDF [5111 KB, uploaded 29 November 2018]   |  
  |   Review Reports

Abstract

The launch of ‘Rapid Recommendations’ by the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) group, in collaboration with Making GRADE the Irresistible Choice (MAGIC) and the British Medical Journal (BMJ), is a very interesting recent development in e-healthcare. Designed to respond quickly to developments that have created new decision situations, their first project resulted from the arrival of minimally invasive Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation (TAVI) as an alternative to Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement (SAVR), for patients with symptomatic severe aortic stenosis. The interactive MAGIC decision aid that accompanies a Rapid Recommendation and is the main route to its clinical implementation, represents a major advance in e-health, for a cardiovascular decision in this case. However, it needs to go further in order to facilitate fully person-centred care, where the weighted preferences of the individual person are elicited at the point of decision, and transparently integrated with the best (most personalised) estimates of option performances, to produce personalised, preference-sensitive option evaluations. This can be achieved by inputting the collated GRADE evidence on the criteria relevant in the TAVI/SAVR choice into a Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis-based decision support tool, generating a personalised, preference-sensitive opinion. A demonstration version of this add-on to the MAGIC aid, divested of recommendations, is available online as proof of method. View Full-Text
Keywords: aortic stenosis; SAVR; TAVI; GRADE; MAGIC; person-centred care; decision support; Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis; preferences aortic stenosis; SAVR; TAVI; GRADE; MAGIC; person-centred care; decision support; Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis; preferences
Figures

Figure 1

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited (CC BY 4.0).
SciFeed

Share & Cite This Article

MDPI and ACS Style

Dowie, J.; Kaltoft, M.K. From Rapid Recommendation to Online Preference-Sensitive Decision Support: The Case of Severe Aortic Stenosis. Med. Sci. 2018, 6, 109.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats

Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Related Articles

Article Metrics

Article Access Statistics

1

Comments

[Return to top]
Med. Sci. EISSN 2076-3271 Published by MDPI AG, Basel, Switzerland RSS E-Mail Table of Contents Alert
Back to Top