Next Article in Journal
Correlation Between Fasting Blood Glucose and Serum Lipid Profile and Lipid Ratios in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus in Southern Thailand: A Cross-Sectional Study
Previous Article in Journal
An Update on Intraocular Lens Technology for Presbyopia Correction and Visual Outcomes
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Treatment of Small Intestinal Bacterial Overgrowth (SIBO) in Gastrointestinal, Hepatic, Endocrine, Neurological, and Postoperative Diseases: A Comprehensive Narrative Review

1
Department of Internal Medicine, Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Sechenov University, Moscow 119435, Russia
2
Scientific and Technological Institute of Metabolic Health, Sechenov University, Moscow 119435, Russia
3
Scientific Community for Human Microbiome Research, Moscow 119435, Russia
4
Reference Center “Human Microbiota”, Moscow 119435, Russia
5
Department of Clinical Immunology and Allergy, Sechenov University, Moscow 119991, Russia
6
Department of Human Anatomy and Histology, Sechenov University, Moscow 125009, Russia
7
Department of Clinical Disciplines, Tyumen State Medical University, Tyumen 625023, Russia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Med. Sci. 2026, 14(2), 300; https://doi.org/10.3390/medsci14020300
Submission received: 20 March 2026 / Revised: 5 June 2026 / Accepted: 6 June 2026 / Published: 10 June 2026
(This article belongs to the Section Hepatic and Gastroenterology Diseases)

Abstract

Small intestinal bacterial overgrowth (SIBO) refers to an abnormal increase in the number of bacteria in the small intestine and is observed in various diseases. SIBO can also develop after long-term use of proton pump inhibitors (drug-induced SIBO), bariatric surgery, gastrectomy, and other surgeries (postoperative SIBO). The aim of this narrative review is to summarize all of the published information on the treatment of SIBO in as much detail as possible and present it separately for each specific disease and intervention associated with SIBO. The most extensively studied drug for the treatment of SIBO is rifaximin. It eliminates SIBO in 63% of cases; however, most studies lack a control group. Small RCTs assessing the effects of this antibiotic on SIBO have reported conflicting results, and a meta-analysis showed no effect. A large RCT is required to verify the results of uncontrolled studies. Neomycin and norfloxacin showed efficacy in the treatment of SIBO in single RCTs, with elimination rates of 20 and 100%, respectively. Ciprofloxacin, rifamycin, metronidazole, and other antibiotics, as well as ursodeoxycholic acid, showed positive effects for the treatment of SIBO, but only in uncontrolled studies or in comparison with rifaximin or other drugs. The reported elimination rates were 54%, 67%, 79%, and 75%, respectively. Eradication therapy for Helicobacter pylori infection eliminated SIBO at a rate of approximately 70%. Probiotics have been tested for treatment of SIBO in various diseases. VSL#3 and Saccharomyces boulardii CNCM I-745 were effective in RCTs, with elimination rates of 58% and 80%, respectively. In conclusion, when selecting SIBO treatment regimens, those that have demonstrated the greatest efficacy for a specific concomitant disease should be preferred, despite the generally low level of evidence supporting these approaches in most cases.

1. Introduction

Small intestinal bacterial overgrowth (SIBO) refers to an abnormal increase in the number of bacteria in the small intestine [1,2,3]. The important role of the gut and its microbiota in maintaining the functioning of the entire body was recently demonstrated. This has led to the development of the gut–brain, gut–metabolism, gut–liver [4], and other axis concepts. Therefore, SIBO should not be considered only a localized intestinal disorder, and its treatment is a pressing issue not only for gastroenterologists but also for doctors in other specialties.

1.1. SIBO Diagnosis

Initially, quantitative analysis of small intestinal bacterial cultures was used for the diagnosis of SIBO; however, due to the difficulty of obtaining such cultures, this method was gradually abandoned and has been replaced with breath tests. The principle of the latter is that, in the presence of excess bacteria in the small intestine, ingested carbohydrates are metabolized by the bacteria, resulting in the formation of a large amount of gas. This gas leaves the body through various routes, including exhaled air, and can thus be determined using special analyzers (Figure 1) [5,6,7].
Historically, the first gas to be determined in this context was hydrogen, and an increase in its release after a carbohydrate load was termed hydrogen SIBO. Later, it was revealed that the small intestinal bacteria can excessively produce methane in some patients with SIBO, and this condition was termed methane SIBO. If both gases are excessively produced, then the condition is considered mixed SIBO. Hydrogen and methane SIBO have different effects on the body. In particular, hydrogen SIBO is generally characterized by diarrhea, whereas methane SIBO is characterized by a reduction in intestinal motility and constipation [8,9].

1.2. The Clinical Significance and Pathophysiology of SIBO

Gas produced by gut bacteria in the context of SIBO stretches the intestinal walls, which manifests as bloating and abdominal pain. Osmotically active substances that are also produced by these bacteria provoke the development of osmotic diarrhea, while the slowing of intestinal motility due to methane production leads to constipation. Thus, SIBO can mimic irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) and functional bloating or may contribute substantially to their symptoms [1,2,3,4]. The increased number of small intestinal bacteria facilitates their penetration into the portal bloodstream and the liver and, with a decrease in the barrier function of the latter, into the systemic bloodstream. This process is called bacterial translocation and is associated with a more severe course of metabolic-associated fatty liver disease and cirrhosis (Figure 2) [10,11]. SIBO is also associated with an unfavorable prognosis in cirrhosis [12], whereas its eradication leads to improved survival [13].

1.3. SIBO and Underlying Conditions

As discussed above, SIBO mimics functional bowel diseases and is detected in 33% of patients with complaints of digestive disorders [14]. It is difficult to conclude whether SIBO is a primary condition, a manifestation of functional bowel diseases, or whether it shares the same primary cause as functional bowel diseases [15,16,17].
The most common cause of drug-induced SIBO is proton pump inhibitor use, which reduces the bactericidal capabilities of the stomach and increases the flow of bacteria from the mouth into the small intestine [18]. Postoperative SIBO is most often observed as a complication of bariatric surgeries, and it is also due to impairment of the bactericidal function of the stomach [19,20].
SIBO can develop as a complication of various diseases [21]. For example, it may occur when small intestinal clearance slows down in patients with hypothyroidism [22], portal enteropathy [11], or systemic sclerosis [23]. SIBO can also develop when the supply of nutrients to the terminal sections of the small intestine increases in those with lactase deficiency [24], chronic pancreatitis [25], and other diseases [21]. In some cases, feedback occurs between SIBO and certain diseases. For example, through an increase in intra-abdominal pressure, SIBO can lead to the development of erosive gastroesophageal reflux disease [26].
Different mechanisms of SIBO development in the context of different underlying conditions can lead to different responses to therapy. For example, antibacterial drugs may be more effective in patients with normal intestinal motility and significantly less effective in patients with intestinal anatomy disruption. Prokinetic agents can lead to the resolution of SIBO in patients with slow intestinal motility but are unlikely to be effective in patients who developed SIBO while taking proton pump inhibitors.

1.4. Rationale for the Review

Given that SIBO significantly reduces the quality of life of affected individuals [27], causing digestive disorders [1] and aggravating the course of the many diseases associated with it [21], it is important to eradicate this pathological condition. To this end, the use of antibiotics, probiotics, and other drugs has been proposed.
Clinical guidelines provide limited information about the effectiveness of various agents in the treatment of SIBO [1,2,28,29]. Previously published reviews have generally described the effectiveness of certain drugs or groups of drugs in SIBO patients, including rifaximin, other antibiotics, or probiotics [30,31,32]. Because SIBO may have different underlying mechanisms in the context of different underlying conditions, treatment effectiveness may vary. The aim of our narrative review was to summarize all of the published information on the treatment of SIBO in as much detail as possible and present it separately for each specific disease and intervention associated with SIBO.
We used PubMed as a source and did not limit the publication time. The search term “small intestinal bacterial overgrowth” was used. In this review, we include only those studies in which the effectiveness of SIBO eradication was assessed based on a negative test for this pathological condition (usually a breath test) after therapy. Unfortunately, a number of studies did not provide such data [33], instead only reporting decreases in the level of exhaled intestinal gases or in the severity of intestinal symptoms. These studies were not included in this review, as the eradication of SIBO cannot be concluded based on these findings. The quality of the studies was assessed primarily by their design (placebo-controlled randomized controlled trial (RCT), RCT without placebo, uncontrolled study) and the number of participants. A total of over 2000 references were found. After excluding all irrelevant articles, 89 studies and 6 meta-analyses were included in this review.

2. Rifaximin for the Treatment of SIBO: A Summary of a Recent Meta-Analysis of Studies

The most widely used drug in the treatment of SIBO is the non-absorbable antibiotic rifaximin, and the main advantage of the use of this drug is that it has rare systemic side effects [34,35,36]. A meta-analysis of its use in the treatment of SIBO was recently published [32]. Given the significant role of this drug in the treatment of SIBO, it would be prudent to present a summary of the results of that meta-analysis before describing the treatment of SIBO in the context of specific conditions in detail. According to that meta-analysis, rifaximin eliminated SIBO in 63% of cases. This rate was 90% for SIBO with cirrhosis and approximately 60% for SIBO in the context of functional bowel diseases and Parkinson’s disease. The most commonly used dose of rifaximin was 1200 mg, with an effectiveness of 64%. The efficacy of different doses of rifaximin is presented in Table 1 [32].
The effectiveness of the therapy did not differ significantly based on duration (3, 5, 7, 10, 14, or 28 days). However, most of the studies analyzed did not include a control group that received a placebo or no treatment. When only RCTs with placebo controls were analyzed (of which there were only 4), the effectiveness of rifaximin was not superior to placebo. It should be noted that all of these RCTs were small and included fewer than 30 patients. In most studies, the elimination of SIBO resulted in a decrease in the severity of digestive symptoms. Rifaximin was not associated with adverse effects or was only associated with mild adverse effects [32]. The advantages of rifaximin include its minimal effect on the intestinal bacterial resistome [37].

3. Treatment of SIBO in Gut Diseases

The treatment of SIBO has been most extensively studied in gut diseases, which can be divided into functional disorders, in which there are no signs of anatomical or histological pathology (irritable bowel syndrome, functional constipation, etc.), and non-functional disorders, in which these signs are present (inflammatory bowel disease, celiac disease, etc.).

3.1. Treatment of SIBO in Functional Bowel Diseases

SIBO is most often found in patients with a preliminary diagnosis of functional bowel disease, including IBS, functional constipation, functional diarrhea, functional bloating, and similar diseases. SIBO has been detected in one-third of patients with IBS [16], 43% of patients with functional bloating [38], and approximately 70% of patients with functional constipation or diarrhea [39].

3.1.1. Rifaximin for the Treatment of SIBO in Functional Bowel Diseases

Uncontrolled studies have shown that rifaximin resolves SIBO in 29.3–87.5% of patients with diarrhea-predominant IBS (Table 2) [40,41,42,43,44].
Rifaximin use in IBS patients improved digestive symptoms exclusively in those diagnosed with SIBO [45,46]. Treatment with 800 mg rifaximin daily for 14 days eliminated SIBO in 86% of patients, and the positive clinical effects of SIBO eradication lasted for at least 3 months [46]. A meta-analysis found that the use of antibiotics in IBS patients led to greater symptom relief when the patients had SIBO [47].
Several studies have directly compared the effectiveness of different doses of rifaximin in terms of relieving SIBO in the context of IBS. A 5-day course of rifaximin at a dose of 800 mg/day had the same effect as a 5-day course of rifaximin at 1200 mg/day [48]. When comparing 7-day courses, a dose of 1200 mg per day was preferable to 600 mg and 800 mg [49], and a dose of 1600 mg/day was preferable to 1200 mg/day [50]. Increasing the dose of rifaximin did not result in an increase in the incidence of adverse effects [50]. An indirect comparison revealed approximately equal effectiveness of 7- and 14-day courses of rifaximin at a dose of 1200 mg [51,52].
Rifaximin at 1200 mg/day for 14 days followed by a 20-day cycle of probiotics allowed for the stable eradication of SIBO in 82.6% of patients with IBS, and this effect persisted for 4–5 months [53]. However, in another study, the stability of SIBO eradication over 3–6 months was demonstrated in 86.7% of patients receiving rifaximin at a dose of 600 mg/day without any probiotics [54]. Rifaximin at 800 mg for 28 days eliminated hydrogen and methane SIBO with equal effectiveness (54.5% vs. 50%) [55]. The antibacterial drug ciprofloxacin at 500 mg/d for 7 days was ineffective in patients with SIBO who did not respond to rifaximin, eliminating SIBO in only 8% of these patients [56].
Rifaximin at 600 mg daily for 1 week eliminated SIBO in 66% of children with IBS, and the effect was accompanied by an improvement in digestive symptoms [57].
A randomized study without a placebo group showed that the addition of partially hydrolyzed guar gum at 5 g/day to a 10-day course of rifaximin at 1200 mg/day increased the SIBO eradication rate from 62.1% to 87.1%. In total, 87–91% of patients with eliminated SIBO also demonstrated a significant improvement in digestive symptoms. The positive effect of this dietary supplement is explained by its ability to normalize intestinal motility, the disruption of which is considered one of the main causes of SIBO [58].
Rifaximin at a dose of 1200 mg/day for 2 weeks eliminated SIBO in 36% of patients with functional bloating, whereas the addition of trimebutine (600 mg/day) had no significant effect [59]. A 10-day course of rifaximin at the same dose led to SIBO elimination in 42% of patients with this disease [60].
Table 2. The efficacy of rifaximin in the treatment of SIBO in functional bowel diseases according to uncontrolled studies.
Table 2. The efficacy of rifaximin in the treatment of SIBO in functional bowel diseases according to uncontrolled studies.
DiseaseDoseSIBO Elimination RateRef.
Diarrhea-predominant IBS800 mg for 14 days44–64%[40,41]
800 mg for 30 days75%[42]
1200 mg for 14 days87.5%[43]
1650 mg for 14 days29.3%[44]
IBS1200 mg for 7 days50%[45]
800 mg for 14 days86%[46]
800 mg for 5 days67%[48]
1200 mg for 5 days67%[48]
600 mg for 7 days16.7%[49]
800 mg for 7 days26.7%[49]
1200 mg for 7 days60%[49]
1200 mg for 7 days61%[50]
1600 mg for 7 days82%[50]
1200 mg for 7 days85.5%[51]
1200 mg for 14 days85.7%[52]
600 mg for 10 days86.7%[55]
800 mg for 28 days50–55%[55]
IBS in children600 mg for 7 days66%[57]
Functional bloating1200 mg for 14 days36%[59]
1200 mg for 10 days42%[60]
Note: Studies with complex designs are not included.
SIBO recurred at 3, 6, and 9 months after successful eradication with rifaximin (at a dose of 1200 mg/day for 10 days) in 12.6%, 27.5%, and 43.7% of patients, respectively. Predictors of recurrence were a history of appendectomy, use of proton pump inhibitors, and older age. SIBO recurrence was associated with the return of digestive symptoms [61].
Therefore, most uncontrolled studies have shown that rifaximin is effective in the treatment of SIBO in the context of functional bowel diseases; however, the specific eradication rates varied.

3.1.2. Other Antibacterial Drugs for the Treatment of SIBO in Functional Bowel Diseases

The effectiveness of other antibacterial drugs in the treatment of SIBO has also been studied (Table 3).
Metronidazole or ornidazole at 1500 mg per day for 10 days per month for 3 months led to the elimination of SIBO in 52% of patients. In addition, norfloxacine at 800 mg per day, ciprofloxacin at 1000 mg per day, or ofloxacin at 400 mg per day for 10 consecutive days per month for 3 months eliminated SIBO in 50% of patients. When these (quinolone and azole) regimens were alternated monthly for 3 months, the effectiveness of the therapy increased to 70% [62].
Table 3. The efficacy of antibiotics other than rifaximin in the treatment of SIBO in functional bowel diseases.
Table 3. The efficacy of antibiotics other than rifaximin in the treatment of SIBO in functional bowel diseases.
DrugDoseSIBO Elimination RateRef.
Rifamycin776 mg for 14 days67%/40% *[63]
1164 mg for 14 days46%/38% *[63]
Tilichinol 400 mg + tilbroquinol 800 mg for 10 days52.5%[64]
Trimethoprim–sulfamethoxazole 30 mg/kg + metronidazole 20 mg/kg for 14 days95% **[65]
Colimycin 405 mg + gentamycin 300 mg for 10 days42%[66]
Chlortetracycline1000 mg for 7 days27% ***[67]
Metronidazole750 mg for 7 days43.7% ***[68]
1500 mg for 10 days79% ***[69]
Ciprofloxacin1000 mg for 10 days54% ***[69]
Neomycin1000 mg for 7 days20% ****[70]
Norfloxacin800 mg for 10 days100% ****/*****[71]
Note: * Hydrogen/methane SIBO, ** in children, *** randomized study without placebo, **** randomized study with placebo, ***** very small study. Studies with complex designs are not included.
Rifamycin (388 mg twice a day vs. 388 mg three times a day) for 14 days eradicated hydrogen SIBO in 67% and 46% of cases and methane SIBO in 40% and 38% of cases, respectively. In the first group of patients, the improvement in breath test results coincided with improvements in abdominal pain, bloating, belching, and flatulence in 25% of patients. In the second group, these improvements were observed in 53% of patients. The severity of constipation generally remained unchanged in the first group of patients but decreased in the second group [63].
Khalighi et al. conducted a comparative analysis on the effectiveness of maintenance therapy using minocycline (100 mg twice a day) with Bacillus coagulans spores and fructo-oligosaccharides for 15 days every month compared with minocycline alone. Before the use of these regimens, an unspecified “aggressive therapy with broad-spectrum antibiotics” was administered. The maintenance therapy itself lasted 6 months. In the antibiotic + symbiotic group, 93.3% of patients did not have SIBO after 6 months of maintenance therapy. In the antibiotic without symbiotic group, only 67.7% achieved this result [72].
Tilichinol (400 mg/day) and tilbroquinol (800 mg/day) for 10 days eliminated SIBO in 52.5% of patients [64], whereas the use of trimethoprim–sulfamethoxazole (30 mg/kg per day) and metronidazole (20 mg/kg per day) for 14 days eliminated SIBO in 95% of children [65]. The combination of colimycin (405 mg/day) and gentamycin (300 mg/day) for 10 days eliminated SIBO in 42% of patients with functional bowel diseases. The frequency of SIBO eradication with respect to specific forms of these diseases (i.e., IBS with constipation, IBS with diarrhea, mixed and unspecified IBS, functional constipation, functional bloating, functional diarrhea, functional abdominal pain) did not differ significantly, with eradication rates of approximately 40% noted in the context of all of these conditions [66].
Attar et al. published a study with a rather complicated design. After a period of taking a placebo (which had no effect on SIBO), 10 patients were randomized to norfloxacin (800 mg/day), amoxicillin–clavulanic acid (1500 mg/day), and Saccharomyces boulardii (1500 mg/day) for 7 days. Patients in whom SIBO did not resolve were given one of the other drugs. In the end, norfloxacin resolved SIBO in three patients, amoxicillin–clavulanic acid in five patients, and Saccharomyces boulardii in none. Because it was not stated how many patients received each treatment, it was not possible to assess their effectiveness [73].
Several randomized trials have compared the effectiveness of rifaximin with that of other antibiotics (Table 4). Rifaximin eradicated SIBO more effectively than chlortetracycline [67] and metronidazole (750 mg/day) [68]. A recent randomized trial compared the effects of 10-day courses of rifaximin-α (800 mg/day), ciprofloxacin (1000 mg/day), and metronidazole (1500 mg/day) on SIBO eradication in IBS patients. At this high dose, metronidazole demonstrated the best results, whereas there was no significant difference in the elimination of SIBO between rifaximin and ciprofloxacin. However, rifaximin caused fewer side effects (9%) compared with the other antibiotics (approximately 40% for each) [69].
Therefore, antibiotics other than rifaximin were also able to eradicate SIBO. In some cases, the effect was comparable to rifaximin; in others, the effect was superior or inferior.

3.1.3. Randomized Placebo-Controlled Trials of Antibiotics for SIBO Treatment in Functional Bowel Diseases

A major weakness of all the studies described above was the absence of a placebo or untreated control group. When classical RCTs are analyzed, the findings appear less encouraging (Table 4).
A small RCT (with 15 and 11 people with SIBO in each group) showed that rifaximin at 550 mg twice daily for 2 weeks was not more effective than placebo in eliminating SIBO in non-constipation IBS patients (13% vs. 18% for hydrogen SIBO and 14% vs. 33%, respectively) [74]. Rifaximin at 550 mg 3 times per day for 10 days was not more effective than placebo in eliminating SIBO in children with chronic abdominal pain in another RCT (20% vs. 14%) [75].
Unlike rifaximin, neomycin at 500 mg bid for 10 days eliminated SIBO in IBS more effectively than placebo (20% vs. 2%) in a large RCT (41 and 43 patients in the treatment and control groups, respectively). Patients with eliminated SIBO reported a significantly greater reduction in symptoms. No significant side effects were noted [70]. Norfloxacin at 800 mg/day for 10 days eliminated SIBO in all 4 IBS patients, which was superior to placebo (4/4 vs. 0/4; p = 0.014) in a very small RCT. The test was performed 1 month after the end of therapy [71].
Therefore, in contrast to uncontrolled studies and active-controlled RCTs, placebo-controlled RCTs showed significantly lower efficacy for rifaximin, which was indistinguishable from placebo. Although superior to placebo, neomycin demonstrated a very low elimination rate, and the trial with norfloxacin had a small number of participants. Larger placebo-controlled RCTs with rifaximin and other antibiotics are needed to confirm the high efficacy rates of these drugs that were previously reported in uncontrolled studies.

3.1.4. Probiotics for the Treatment of SIBO in Functional Bowel Diseases

In addition to antibiotics, probiotics, which are preparations containing live bacteria [76,77], have been used for the treatment of SIBO in patients with functional bowel diseases.
An RCT compared the efficacy of 4-week courses of Saccharomyces boulardii at 250 mg bid and a multi-strain probiotic (Bifidobacterium bifidum, Bifidobacterium longum, Bifidobacterium infantis, and Lactobacillus rhamnosus) at 250 mg bid against placebo in the treatment of SIBO in patients with a diarrheal variant of IBS. Both drugs showed a positive effect. SIBO was eliminated in 40% of patients in the Saccharomyces boulardii group and in all 11 patients in the multi-strain probiotic group. However, SIBO was not eliminated in any of the 10 patients in the placebo group [78].
A multi-strain probiotic containing 25 billion active bacteria with 12 different strains (Lactobacillus rhamnosus at 6.0 billion CFU, Bifidobacterium bifidum at 5.0 billion CFU, L. acidophilus at 3.0 billion CFU, L. casei at 2.5 billion CFU, L. plantarum at 2.0 billion CFU, L. salivarius at 2.0 billion CFU, B. longum at 1.0 billion CFU, Streptococcus thermophilus at 1.0 billion CFU, L. bulgaricus at 1.0 billion CFU, L. paracasei at 0.5 billion CFU, B. lactis at 0.5 billion CFU, and B. breve at 0.5 billion CFU) eliminated SIBO in 33.3% of patients with diarrhea-predominant IBS in an uncontrolled study [79].
A probiotic containing Bacillus subtilis and Enterococcus faecium at 1500 mg/day for 4 weeks eliminated SIBO in 53% of patients with functional bowel disorders, and the probiotic was significantly more effective than placebo [80]. Bifidobacterium infantis M-63 at 1 × 109 CFU/day for 3 months had no significant effect on SIBO [81].

3.1.5. Other Interventions in the Treatment of SIBO in Functional Bowel Diseases

Drugs from other groups have also been assessed for the treatment of SIBO in functional bowel disease patients.
Herbal preparations administered for 4 weeks demonstrated a similar effect on the eradication of SIBO as rifaximin at 1200 mg/day (46% vs. 34%). Moreover, herbal preparations eliminated SIBO in 57% of patients who did not respond to rifaximin [82].
An RCT compared the efficacy of 4-week courses of prucalopride at 2 mg/day and a multi-strain probiotic (Bifidobacterium bifidum, Bifidobacterium longum, Bifidobacterium infantis, Lactobacillus rhamnosus) at 250 mg bid with placebo for the treatment of SIBO in patients with a constipation variant of IBS. Both drugs showed a positive effect. SIBO was eliminated in both patients in the prucalopride group and in all nine patients in the multi-strain probiotic group, but in none of the nine patients in the placebo group [83]. Prucalopride is a prokinetic laxative that accelerates intestinal peristalsis [84], the slowing down of which is one of the factors involved in the development of SIBO.
A palatable elemental diet for 2 weeks eliminated methane, hydrogen, and mixed SIBO in 58%, 100%, and 75% of cases, respectively; however, the study lacked a control group [85]. Lubiprostone is a laxative that stimulates the intestines to secrete chloride-rich fluid, increasing the volume of intestinal contents. The administration of lubiprostone at 24 mcg orally bid for 2 weeks eliminated SIBO in 41% of patients with chronic constipation [86]. Simethicone, an anti-foaming agent used to reduce bloating [87], and the herbal supplement curcumin [88] were not effective in treating SIBO.

3.1.6. Drugs for the Treatment of SIBO in Functional Bowel Diseases: Conclusions

Rifaximin remains the most extensively studied drug for the treatment of SIBO in functional bowel disease. However, unlike many uncontrolled studies, placebo-controlled RCTs have demonstrated limited efficacy. This highlights the need for larger placebo-controlled RCTs. In comparative RCTs without placebo controls, some antibiotics (ciprofloxacin) showed a similar effect to rifaximin, whereas others were superior (metronidazole at 1500 mg/day) or inferior (metronidazole at 750 mg/day and chlortetracycline). Two antibiotics were shown to be superior to placebo in the treatment of SIBO in functional bowel disease in RCTs. However, the eradication rate in the study evaluating neomycin was too low, and the study on norfloxacin included too few participants. Drugs from other groups (probiotics, laxatives, herbal supplements, and an anti-foaming agent) showed variable effects in the treatment of SIBO.

3.2. Treatments for SIBO in Non-Functional Gut Diseases

SIBO is often detected in patients with Crohn’s disease [89,90], diverticular disease [91], lactase deficiency [92], short bowel syndrome [93], celiac disease [94], and other non-functional gut diseases [21] and significantly contributes to the digestive symptoms associated with these diseases.

3.2.1. Treatment of SIBO in Crohn’s Disease

Rifaximin eliminated SIBO in patients with inactive Crohn’s disease more effectively than placebo in a small RCT (100% vs. 28.5%; 7 patients in each group); however, SIBO recurred in all patients at 1 month after the start of therapy (Table 5) [95]. An RCT showed that metronidazole and ciprofloxacin eliminated SIBO in Crohn’s disease patients with similar efficacies, and the effects were accompanied by reductions in the severity of bloating, stool softness, and abdominal pain [96]. Given the high recurrence rate of SIBO, patients should undergo testing for this condition periodically after successful eradication. The exact retesting regime should be established in future studies.

3.2.2. Treatment of SIBO in Diverticular Disease

Rifaximin was more effective than placebo in relieving SIBO (83.3% vs. 8.3%) in patients with uncomplicated diverticular disease in a small RCT (12 patients in each group). Moreover, SIBO was eliminated in 78% of patients in the placebo group after treatment with rifaximin [97]. Rifaximin at 800 mg/day plus mesalazine at 2.4 g/day for 10 days, followed by mesalazine at 1.6 g/d for 8 weeks, eliminated SIBO in 98.8% of patients with acute uncomplicated diverticulitis, resulting in a significant improvement in symptoms [98].

3.2.3. Treatment of SIBO in Lactose Intolerance

Rifaximin eliminated hydrogen SIBO in 32% of patients with lactose intolerance; however, the study lacked a control group [99].

3.2.4. Treatment of SIBO in Short Bowel Syndrome

In the treatment of SIBO in children with short bowel syndrome, one antibiotic was sufficient in 56% of cases, two antibiotics had to be used in 36% of cases, and three antibiotics were used in the remaining 8%. Trimethoprim–sulfamethoxazole, metronidazole, amoxicillin/clavulanic acid, rifaximin, vancomycin, and gentamicin were used; however, the effectiveness of each agent was not reported. The average duration of therapy was 7–16 days [100].

3.2.5. Treatment of SIBO in Celiac Disease

All 10 patients with SIBO and celiac disease were successfully treated with rifaximin at 800 mg/day for 1 week, which resulted in relief of symptoms; however, this study lacked a control group [101]. Rifaximin at 1200 mg daily for 10 days had no significant effect regarding the treatment of SIBO in patients with celiac disease and a poor response to a gluten-free diet compared with placebo in a small RCT (33.3% vs. 33.3%) [102].

3.2.6. Treatment of SIBO in Chronic Intestinal Pseudo-Obstruction

Rifaximin at 400 mg tid for 4 weeks eradicated SIBO in 75% of patients with chronic intestinal pseudo-obstruction in an RCT. This rate was higher than that in the placebo group (25%). This is potentially due to the small number of participants (4 in each group), and this difference did not reach the limits of significance. After 8 weeks, SIBO recurred in all patients in the rifaximin group [103]. Given the high recurrence rate of SIBO, patients should undergo periodic testing for this condition after successful eradication. The exact retesting regime should be established in future studies.
Table 5. The efficacy of drugs in the treatment of SIBO in non-functional bowel diseases.
Table 5. The efficacy of drugs in the treatment of SIBO in non-functional bowel diseases.
DiseaseDrugDoseDesignSIBO Elimination RateRef.
Crohn’s diseaseRifaximin1200 mg for 7 dayspRCT100% *[95]
Metronidazole750 mg for 10 daysRCTwoP86.7%[96]
Ciprofloxacin1000 mg for 10 daysRCTwoP100%[96]
Uncomplicated diverticular diseaseRifaximin1200 mg for 14 dayspRCT83.3% *[97]
Lactose intoleranceRifaximin1200 mg for 14 daysuCS32%[99]
Celiac diseaseRifaximin800 mg for 7 daysuCS100% *[101]
Celiac disease resistant to a gluten-free dietRifaximin1200 mg for 10 dayspRCT33.3% *[102]
Chronic intestinal pseudo-obstructionRifaximin1200 mg for 28 dayspRCT75% *[103]
Note: * very small study; pRCT-RCT, with placebo; RCTwoP-RCT, without placebo; uCS, uncontrolled study. Studies with complex designs are not included.

4. Treatment of SIBO in Cirrhosis and Other Digestive Diseases

4.1. Treatment of SIBO in Cirrhosis

SIBO plays a special role in cirrhosis. Due to disruption of the intestinal, immune, and liver barriers, the development of SIBO leads to bacterial translocation and systemic inflammation. This induces systemic vasodilation, arterial hypotension, compensatory fluid retention, and hyperdynamic circulation. The latter aggravates the course of portal hypertension [104]. This explains why SIBO is associated with many complications of cirrhosis [11,105] and an unfavorable prognosis [12]. Thus, it is especially important to identify and treat this gut microbiota disorder in the context of this disease.
A blinded, randomized, placebo-controlled study showed that a probiotic containing Saccharomyces boulardii CNCM I-745 given at a dose of 250 mg twice daily for 3 months eliminated SIBO in 80% of decompensated cirrhosis patients (compared to 23% in the placebo group; Table 6). This effect was accompanied by a decrease in the severity of hepatic encephalopathy, ascites, hyperbilirubinemia, thrombocytopenia, hypoalbuminemia, hemodynamic changes, biomarkers of bacterial translocation, endothelial dysfunction, and systemic inflammation [13].
Rifaximin at 600 mg/day for 1 week eliminated SIBO in 76% of patients with cirrhosis and minimal hepatic encephalopathy. This effect was accompanied by a more significant decrease in hyperammonemia and the severity of minimal hepatic encephalopathy than that in individuals without SIBO at inclusion [106]. Rifaximin at 1200 mg/day eliminated hydrogen SIBO in 66.7% and methane SIBO in 20% of patients with cirrhosis and covert hepatic encephalopathy in a small study (including only eight patients) [107]. Rifaximin at 1200 mg/day for 1 week eliminated SIBO in 94% (16/17) of patients with cirrhosis and hepatic encephalopathy. This effect was accompanied by a significant improvement in mental function [108]. It should be noted that there were no control groups in these studies.
The administration of the multi-strain probiotic VSL#3 for 3 months eliminated SIBO in 57.6% of patients with cirrhosis and without overt hepatic encephalopathy, and this rate was significantly higher compared with that reported for the control group (19.2%) [109].

4.2. Treatment of SIBO in Other Digestive Diseases

When administered for 2 months, a probiotic containing Bifidobacterium eliminated SIBO in 80% of patients with idiopathic halitosis, and this effect was almost always accompanied by normalization of oral odor. There was no control group [110].
A meta-analysis of rifaximin treatment showed that this antibiotic eliminated SIBO in 76% of cases of chronic pancreatitis [111]. The administration of rifaximin at 1200 mg for 7 consecutive days each month for 3 months cured SIBO in all 12 patients with chronic pancreatitis, and this effect was accompanied by a reduction in diarrhea [112].
Bismuth-based quadruple eradication therapy for Helicobacter pylori infection eliminated hydrogen and methane SIBO in 66.7% and 76.9% of patients with this infection, respectively [113]. Eradication therapy consisting of pantoprazole (2 × 40 mg), amoxicillin (2 × 1000 mg), and metronidazole (2 × 500 mg) for 10 days eliminated SIBO in 60.0% of patients with Helicobacter infection. The substitution of metronidazole for rifaximin (1200 mg) resulted in a non-significant increase in therapeutic efficacy to 75%. The efficacy of eradication therapy was similar in both groups [114].
Ursodeoxycholic acid at 100 mg tid for 2 months eliminated hydrogen SIBO in 75% of patients with functional dyspepsia (placebo was effective in none). However, regarding methane SIBO, this drug had an identical effect to placebo. The number of patients studied was very small (less than 10 patients in each group) [115].

5. Treatment of Iatrogenic SIBO

5.1. Treatment of Drug-Induced SIBO

SIBO is considered as drug-induced if its development is associated with medication use. Rifaximin at a dose of 1200 mg/day for 14 days eliminated 68% of cases of hydrogen SIBO and 53% of cases of methane SIBO that developed after long-term use of proton pump inhibitors [116].

5.2. Treatment of Postoperative SIBO

SIBO is considered postoperative if it develops after surgery. A probiotic regimen containing Lactobacillus acidophilus, Bifidobacterium lactis, Lactobacillus rhamnosus, Bifidobacterium longum, Lactobacillus plantarum, Bifidobacterium bifidum, and Lactobacillus gasseri at a dose of 50 billion CFU/day for 8 weeks and another probiotic regimen based on Lactobacillus acidophilus and Bifidobacterium lactis (5 billion CFU/strain) for 90 days had no significant effect on SIBO development in patients after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass bariatric surgery [117,118].
Metronidazole at a dose of 750–1000 mg/day for 7 days every month for 3 months eliminated postoperative SIBO in 58% of cases. The addition of gentamicin 80 mg/day to this regimen did not significantly alter its efficacy [119].
Rifaximin at 1200 mg/day for 10 days and metronidazole at 1500 mg/day were not effective in the treatment of SIBO as a complication of gastrectomy, with eradication rates of 5.4% and 14.3%, respectively [120]. Rifaximin at 1200 mg/day for 10 days eliminated SIBO in 33.3% of patients undergoing surgery for colorectal cancer. This effect was accompanied by a decrease in the severity of digestive symptoms, which remained unchanged in the subgroup of patients who did not respond to this drug [121].

6. Treatment of SIBO in Other Diseases

SIBO is often detected in patients with diseases of organs not related to the digestive system [21].

6.1. Treatment of SIBO in Systemic Sclerosis

A meta-analysis of nine studies on the effectiveness of antibiotics in the treatment of SIBO in systemic sclerosis showed that these drugs eliminate SIBO in 56% (95% CI: 48–65%) of cases. Rifaximin was more effective than other antibiotics (78% [95% CI: 65–88] vs. 45% [95% CI: 32–58]). No studies compared an antibiotic group with a placebo or an untreated control group. Most studies did not report the development of significant adverse effects. Only one case of pseudomembranous colitis in response to treatment of SIBO was described [122].
García Collinot et al. compared metronidazole (500 mg bid for 7 days), Saccharomyces boulardii (200 mg bid for 7 days), and their combination (in this case, Saccharomyces boulardii was taken for 14 days) in the eradication of SIBO in systemic sclerosis. This therapy was repeated 1 month after its start. After the first course of Saccharomyces boulardii therapy, SIBO was eradicated in 25% of patients. After the second course, this rate increased to 33%. These values were 30% and 25% for metronidazole and 48% and 55% for the combination therapy, respectively [123].

6.2. Treatment of SIBO in Cystic Fibrosis

Oral administration of ciprofloxacin eliminates SIBO in cystic fibrosis more effectively than intravenous amikacin and ceftazidime (90% vs. 44%) [124]. A small RCT showed that rifaximin eliminates SIBO in cystic fibrosis better than placebo (9/10 vs. 2/6) [125]. The CFTR modulators had no significant effect on SIBO in cystic fibrosis [126].

6.3. Treatment of SIBO in Other Non-Digestive Diseases

The results of treatment of SIBO in various non-digestive diseases are detailed in Table 7 and Table 8.

7. Summary, Limitations, and Perspectives

The most extensively studied drug for the treatment of SIBO in various diseases is rifaximin. However, most of the studies have lacked a control group. Increasing the dose of this drug improved its effectiveness. Small RCTs assessing the effects of rifaximin in SIBO have reported conflicting results, and a meta-analysis showed no effect. A large RCT is required to verify the positive effect of rifaximin in the treatment of SIBO. Neomycin and norfloxacin have also shown efficacy in the treatment of SIBO in single RCTs. Other antibiotics have also shown positive effects for the treatment of SIBO, but only in uncontrolled studies or in comparison with rifaximin or each other. Various probiotics have been tested in the treatment of SIBO in the context of various diseases, including VSL#3 and Saccharomyces boulardii CNCM I-745, both of which showed positive effects in RCTs.
Rifaximin demonstrated an excellent safety profile with minimal adverse effects in all studies. Similar data were obtained for probiotics. The use of antibiotics other than rifaximin resulted in more frequent adverse effects.
Therefore, the main limitation for a guideline on SIBO treatment is that most of the data are derived from uncontrolled studies, and most of the RCTs conducted included limited numbers of participants. Another limitation is that different studies used varying breath test substrates, cut-off values, and testing protocols, which may affect SIBO detection rates and complicate cross-study comparisons.
It appears promising to investigate the effectiveness of different diets, exercises, prebiotics, postbiotics, new antibiotics, and fecal transplantation for the treatment of SIBO under specific conditions. A palatable elemental diet showed good effects on SIBO in functional bowel diseases in an uncontrolled study [85]. In a recent RCT without a placebo control, a low FODMAP diet for 4 weeks showed a similar SIBO eradication rate in IBS patients as rifaximin 1200 mg for 14 days (50.0% vs. 63.6%) [137]. The same diet eliminated SIBO in 80.9% of patients with halitosis, and this effect was accompanied by an improvement in symptoms of the underlying disease in an uncontrolled retrospective study [138].
Fecal microbiota transplantation reduced intestinal hydrogen production in patients with SIBO and Parkinson’s [139] and functional bowel diseases [140]. However, SIBO eradication rates were not reported in these studies [139,140]. This procedure eliminated SIBO in 71% of patients with chronic intestinal pseudo-obstruction in a small uncontrolled study [141].
Currently, several RCTs have been conducted to assess SIBO treatments (Table 9).

8. Conclusions

When selecting SIBO treatment regimens, those that have demonstrated efficacy for the specific underlying condition should be preferred, particularly those shown to be efficacious in RCTs, although such data remain limited. In the absence of RCT evidence, regimens that have demonstrated the highest SIBO eradication rates in uncontrolled studies may be considered. The low level of evidence should be kept in mind in this case. Large placebo-controlled RCTs are necessary to accurately evaluate the efficacy of drugs and other interventions for the treatment of SIBO in specific clinical conditions.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, V.I. and R.M.; methodology, R.M.; writing—original draft preparation, R.M., V.A., E.P., A.U., O.Z., A.K., E.K., T.D., Y.Z., A.S. and V.I.; writing—review and editing, R.M., V.A., E.P., A.U., O.Z., A.K., E.K., T.D., Y.Z., A.S. and V.I.; visualization, R.M.; supervision, V.I. and E.P. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

No new data were created or analyzed in this study.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Abbreviations

The following abbreviations are used in this manuscript:
IBSIrritable bowel syndrome
RCTRandomized controlled trial
SIBOSmall Intestinal Bacterial Overgrowth

References

  1. Bushyhead, D.; Quigley, E.M.M. Small Intestinal Bacterial Overgrowth-Pathophysiology and Its Implications for Definition and Management. Gastroenterology 2022, 163, 593–607. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Ghoshal, U.C.; Sachdeva, S.; Ghoshal, U.; Misra, A.; Puri, A.S.; Pratap, N.; Shah, A.; Rahman, M.M.; Gwee, K.A.; Tan, V.P.Y.; et al. Asian-Pacific consensus on small intestinal bacterial overgrowth in gastrointestinal disorders: An initiative of the Indian Neurogastroenterology and Motility Association. Indian J. Gastroenterol. 2022, 41, 483–507. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Ivashkin, V.T.; Maev, I.V.; Abdulganieva, D.I.; Alekseeva, O.P.; Alekseenko, S.A.; Zolnikova, O.Y.; Korochanskaya, N.V.; Medvedev, O.S.; Poluektova, E.A.; Simanenkov, V.I.; et al. Practical Recommendation of the Scientific Community for Human Microbiome Research (CHMR) and the Russian Gastroenterological Association (RGA) on Small Intestinal Bacterial Overgrowth in Adults. Russ. J. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. Coloproctol. 2022, 32, 68–85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Cao, X.; Zolnikova, O.Y.; Maslennikov, R.V.; Poluektova, E.A.; Bueverova, E.L.; Reshetova, M.S.; Zharkova, M.S.; Ivashkin, V.T. Metabolic Profiles of the Gut Microbiota in Patients with Different Stages of Metabolism Dysfunction-Associated Fatty Liver Disease. Russ. J. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. Coloproct. 2024, 34, 64–74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Broekaert, I.J.; Borrelli, O.; Dolinsek, J.; Martin-de-Carpi, J.; Mas, E.; Miele, E.; Pienar, C.; Ribes-Koninckx, C.; Thomassen, R.; Thomson, M.; et al. An ESPGHAN Position Paper on the Use of Breath Testing in Paediatric Gastroenterology. J. Pediatr. Gastroenterol. Nutr. 2022, 74, 123–137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Baker, J.R.; Chey, W.D.; Watts, L.; Armstrong, M.; Collins, K.; Lee, A.A.; Dupati, A.; Menees, S.; Saad, R.J.; Harer, K.; et al. How the North American Consensus Protocol Affects the Performance of Glucose Breath Testing for Bacterial Overgrowth Versus a Traditional Method. Am. J. Gastroenterol. 2021, 116, 780–787. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Losurdo, G.; Leandro, G.; Ierardi, E.; Perri, F.; Barone, M.; Principi, M.; Leo, A.D. Breath Tests for the Non-invasive Diagnosis of Small Intestinal Bacterial Overgrowth: A Systematic Review With Meta-analysis. J. Neurogastroenterol. Motil. 2020, 26, 16–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Madigan, K.E.; Bundy, R.; Weinberg, R.B. Distinctive Clinical Correlates of Small Intestinal Bacterial Overgrowth with Methanogens. Clin. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2022, 20, 1598–1605.e2. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. de Lacy Costello, B.P.; Ledochowski, M.; Ratcliffe, N.M. The importance of methane breath testing: A review. J. Breath Res. 2013, 7, 024001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Gudan, A.; Jamioł-Milc, D.; Hawryłkowicz, V.; Skonieczna-Żydecka, K.; Stachowska, E. The Prevalence of Small Intestinal Bacterial Overgrowth in Patients with Non-Alcoholic Liver Diseases: NAFLD, NASH, Fibrosis, Cirrhosis—A Systematic Review, Meta-Analysis and Meta-Regression. Nutrients 2022, 14, 5261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Maslennikov, R.; Pavlov, C.; Ivashkin, V. Small intestinal bacterial overgrowth in cirrhosis: Systematic review and metaanalysis. Hepatol. Int. 2018, 12, 567–576. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Efremova, I.; Maslennikov, R.; Alieva, A.; Poluektova, E.; Ivashkin, V. Small Intestinal Bacterial Overgrowth Is Associated with Poor Prognosis in Cirrhosis. Microorganisms 2023, 11, 1017. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Efremova, I.; Maslennikov, R.; Zharkova, M.; Poluektova, E.; Benuni, N.; Kotusov, A.; Demina, T.; Ivleva, A.; Adzhieva, F.; Krylova, T.; et al. Efficacy and Safety of a Probiotic Containing Saccharomyces boulardii CNCM I-745 in the Treatment of Small Intestinal Bacterial Overgrowth in Decompensated Cirrhosis: Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Study. J. Clin. Med. 2024, 13, 919. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Kiow, J.L.C.; Bellila, R.; Therrien, A.; Sidani, S.; Bouin, M. Predictors of Small Intestinal Bacterial Overgrowth in Symptomatic Patients Referred for Breath Testing. J. Clin. Med. Res. 2020, 12, 655–661. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Plauzolles, A.; Uras, S.; Pénaranda, G.; Bonnet, M.; Dukan, P.; Retornaz, F.; Halfon, P. Small Intestinal Bacterial Overgrowths and Intestinal Methanogen Overgrowths Breath Testing in a Real-Life French Cohort. Clin. Transl. Gastroenterol. 2023, 14, e00556. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Ghoshal, U.C.; Nehra, A.; Mathur, A.; Rai, S. A meta-analysis on small intestinal bacterial overgrowth in patients with different subtypes of irritable bowel syndrome. J. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2020, 35, 922–931. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Shah, A.; Talley, N.J.; Jones, M.; Kendall, B.J.; Koloski, N.; Walker, M.M.; Morrison, M.; Holtmann, G.J. Small Intestinal Bacterial Overgrowth in Irritable Bowel Syndrome: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Case-Control Studies. Am. J. Gastroenterol. 2020, 115, 190–201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Su, T.; Lai, S.; Lee, A.; He, X.; Chen, S. Meta-analysis: Proton pump inhibitors moderately increase the risk of small intestinal bacterial overgrowth. J. Gastroenterol. 2018, 53, 27–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Novljan, U.; Pintar, T. Small Intestinal Bacterial Overgrowth in Patients with Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass and OneAnastomosis Gastric Bypass. Obes. Surg. 2022, 32, 4102–4109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Kaniel, O.; Sherf-Dagan, S.; Szold, A.; Langer, P.; Khalfin, B.; Kessler, Y.; Raziel, A.; Sakran, N.; Motro, Y.; Goitein, D.; et al. The Effects of One Anastomosis Gastric Bypass Surgery on the Gastrointestinal Tract. Nutrients 2022, 14, 304. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Efremova, I.; Maslennikov, R.; Poluektova, E.; Vasilieva, E.; Zharikov, Y.; Suslov, A.; Letyagina, Y.; Kozlov, E.; Levshina, A.; Ivashkin, V. Epidemiology of small intestinal bacterial overgrowth. World J. Gastroenterol. 2023, 29, 3400–3421. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Patil, A.D. Link between hypothyroidism and small intestinal bacterial overgrowth. Indian J. Endocrinol. Metab. 2014, 18, 307–309. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Feng, X.; Li, X.Q.; Jiang, Z. Prevalence and predictors of small intestinal bacterial overgrowth in systemic sclerosis: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin. Rheumatol. 2021, 40, 3039–3051. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Ghafoor, A.; Karunaratne, T.; Rao, S.S.C. Bacterial overgrowth and lactose intolerance: How to best assess. Curr. Opin. Clin. Nutr. Metab. Care 2022, 25, 334–340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Lee, A.A.; Baker, J.R.; Wamsteker, E.J.; Saad, R.; DiMagno, M.J. Small Intestinal Bacterial Overgrowth Is Common in Chronic Pancreatitis and Associates With Diabetes, Chronic Pancreatitis Severity, Low Zinc Levels, and Opiate Use. Am. J. Gastroenterol. 2019, 114, 1163–1171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Kim, K.M.; Kim, B.T.; Lee, D.J.; Park, S.B.; Joo, N.S.; Kim, Y.S.; Kim, K.N. Erosive esophagitis may be related to small intestinal bacterial overgrowth. Scand. J. Gastroenterol. 2012, 47, 493–498. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Chuah, K.H.; Hian, W.X.; Lim, S.Z.; Beh, K.H.; Mahadeva, S. Impact of small intestinal bacterial overgrowth on symptoms and quality of life in irritable bowel syndrome. J. Dig. Dis. 2023, 24, 194–202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Silva, B.C.D.; Ramos, G.P.; Barros, L.L.; Ramos, A.F.P.; Domingues, G.; Chinzon, D.; Passos, M.D.C.F. Diagnosis and treatment of small intestinal bacterial overgrowth: An official position paper from the brazilian federation of gastroenterology. Arq. Gastroenterol. 2025, 62, e24107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Quigley, E.M.M.; Murray, J.A.; Pimentel, M. AGA Clinical Practice Update on Small Intestinal Bacterial Overgrowth: Expert Review. Gastroenterology 2020, 159, 1526–1532. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Martyniak, A.; Wójcicka, M.; Rogatko, I.; Piskorz, T.; Tomasik, P.J. A Comprehensive Review of the Usefulness of Prebiotics, Probiotics, and Postbiotics in the Diagnosis and Treatment of Small Intestine Bacterial Overgrowth. Microorganisms 2025, 13, 57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Rao, S.S.C.; Bhagatwala, J. Small Intestinal Bacterial Overgrowth: Clinical Features and Therapeutic Management. Clin. Transl. Gastroenterol. 2019, 10, e00078. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Wang, J.; Zhang, L.; Hou, X. Efficacy of rifaximin in treating with small intestine bacterial overgrowth: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Expert Rev. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2021, 15, 1385–1399. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Ghoshal, U.C.; Srivastava, D.; Misra, A. A randomized double-blind placebo-controlled trial showing rifaximin to improve constipation by reducing methane production and accelerating colon transit: A pilot study. Indian J. Gastroenterol. 2018, 37, 416–423. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Yang, W.; Guo, G.; Sun, C. Therapeutic potential of rifaximin in liver diseases. BioMed. Pharmacother. 2024, 178, 117283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Deljavan Ghodrati, A.; Comoglu, T. Rifaximin and alternative agents in the management of irritable bowel syndrome: A comprehensive review. Arch. Pharm. 2024, 357, e2400356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Dumitrascu, D.L.; Bakulin, I.; Berzigotti, A.; Cravo, M.; Gombošová, L.; Lukas, M.; Pietrzak, A.; Remes-Troche, J.M.; Romero-Gómez, M.; Balmori, M.A.; et al. Update on the Role of Rifaximin in Digestive Diseases. J. Gastrointestin. Liver Dis. 2023, 32, 92–109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Yu, X.; Jin, Y.; Zhou, W.; Xiao, T.; Wu, Z.; Su, J.; Gao, H.; Shen, P.; Zheng, B.; Luo, Q.; et al. Rifaximin Modulates the Gut Microbiota to Prevent Hepatic Encephalopathy in Liver Cirrhosis Without Impacting the Resistome. Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol. 2022, 11, 761192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Noh, C.K.; Lee, K.J. Fecal Microbiota Alterations and Small Intestinal Bacterial Overgrowth in Functional Abdominal Bloating/Distention. J. Neurogastroenterol. Motil. 2020, 26, 539–549. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Madrid, A.M.; Defilippi, C.C.; Defilippi, G.C.; Slimming, A.J.; Quera, P.R. Small intestinal bacterial overgrowth in patients with functional gastrointestinal diseases. Rev. Med. Chil. 2007, 135, 1245–1252. [Google Scholar]
  40. Zhuang, X.; Tian, Z.; Luo, M.; Xiong, L. Short-course Rifaximin therapy efficacy and lactulose hydrogen breath test in Chinese patients with diarrhea-predominant irritable bowel syndrome. BMC Gastroenterol. 2020, 20, 187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Zhuang, X.; Tian, Z.; Li, L.; Zeng, Z.; Chen, M.; Xiong, L. Fecal Microbiota Alterations Associated With Diarrhea-Predominant Irritable Bowel Syndrome. Front. Microbiol. 2018, 9, 1600. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Majewski, M.; McCallum, R.W. Results of small intestinal bacterial overgrowth testing in irritable bowel syndrome patients: Clinical profiles and effects of antibiotic trial. Adv. Med. Sci. 2007, 52, 139–142. [Google Scholar]
  43. Li, Y.; Hong, G.; Yang, M.; Li, G.; Jin, Y.; Xiong, H.; Qian, W.; Hou, X. Fecal bacteria can predict the efficacy of rifaximin in patients with diarrhea-predominant irritable bowel syndrome. Pharmacol. Res. 2020, 159, 104936. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Rezaie, A.; Heimanson, Z.; McCallum, R.; Pimentel, M. Lactulose Breath Testing as a Predictor of Response to Rifaximin in Patients With Irritable Bowel Syndrome With Diarrhea. Am. J. Gastroenterol. 2019, 114, 1886–1893. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Peralta, S.; Cottone, C.; Doveri, T.; Almasio, P.L.; Craxi, A. Small intestine bacterial overgrowth and irritable bowel syndrome-related symptoms: Experience with Rifaximin. World J. Gastroenterol. 2009, 15, 2628–2631. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Meyrat, P.; Safroneeva, E.; Schoepfer, A.M. Rifaximin treatment of the irritable bowel syndrome with a positive lactulose hydrogen breath test improves symptoms for at least 3 months. Aliment. Pharmacol. Ther. 2012, 36, 1084–1093. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Takakura, W.; Rezaie, A.; Chey, W.D.; Wang, J.; Pimentel, M. Symptomatic Response to Antibiotics in Patients With Small Intestinal Bacterial Overgrowth: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. J. Neurogastroenterol. Motil. 2024, 30, 7–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Corazza, G.R.; Ventrucci, M.; Strocchi, A.; Sorge, M.; Pranzo, L.; Pezzilli, R.; Gasbarrini, G. Treatment of small intestine bacterial overgrowth with rifaximin, a non-absorbable rifamycin. J. Int. Med. Res. 1988, 16, 312–316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Lauritano, E.C.; Gabrielli, M.; Lupascu, A.; Santoliquido, A.; Nucera, G.; Scarpellini, E.; Vincenti, F.; Cammarota, G.; Flore, R.; Pola, P.; et al. Rifaximin dose-finding study for the treatment of small intestinal bacterial overgrowth. Aliment. Pharmacol. Ther. 2005, 22, 31–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Scarpellini, E.; Gabrielli, M.; Lauritano, C.E.; Lupascu, A.; Merra, G.; Cammarota, G.; Cazzato, I.A.; Gasbarrini, G.; Gasbarrini, A. High dosage rifaximin for the treatment of small intestinal bacterial overgrowth. Aliment. Pharmacol. Ther. 2007, 25, 781–786. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  51. Moraru, I.G.; Moraru, A.G.; Andrei, M.; Iordache, T.; Drug, V.; Diculescu, M.; Portincasa, P.; Dumitrascu, D.L. Small intestinal bacterial overgrowth is associated to symptoms in irritable bowel syndrome. Evidence from a multicentre study in Romania. Rom. J. Intern. Med. 2014, 52, 143–150. [Google Scholar]
  52. Moraru, I.G.; Portincasa, P.; Moraru, A.G.; Diculescu, M.; Dumitraşcu, D.L. Small intestinal bacterial overgrowth produces symptoms in irritable bowel syndrome which are improved by rifaximin. A pilot study. Rom. J. Intern. Med. 2013, 51, 143–147. [Google Scholar]
  53. Cuoco, L.; Salvagnini, M. Small intestine bacterial overgrowth in irritable bowel syndrome: A retrospective study with rifaximin. Minerva Gastroenterol. Dietol. 2006, 52, 89–95. [Google Scholar]
  54. Enko, D.; Halwachs-Baumann, G.; Stolba, R.; Mangge, H.; Kriegshäuser, G. Refining small intestinal bacterial overgrowth diagnosis by means of carbohydrate specificity: A proof-of-concept study. Ther. Adv. Gastroenterol. 2016, 9, 265–272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Majewski, M.; Reddymasu, S.C.; Sostarich, S.; Foran, P.; McCallum, R.W. Efficacy of rifaximin, a nonabsorbed oral antibiotic, in the treatment of small intestinal bacterial overgrowth. Am. J. Med. Sci. 2007, 333, 266–270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Esposito, I.; de Leone, A.; Di Gregorio, G.; Giaquinto, S.; de Magistris, L.; Ferrieri, A.; Riegler, G. Breath test for differential diagnosis between small intestinal bacterial overgrowth and irritable bowel disease: An observation on non-absorbable antibiotics. World J. Gastroenterol. 2007, 13, 6016–6021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Scarpellini, E.; Giorgio, V.; Gabrielli, M.; Filoni, S.; Vitale, G.; Tortora, A.; Ojetti, V.; Gigante, G.; Fundarò, C.; Gasbarrini, A. Rifaximin treatment of small intestinal bacterial overgrowth in children with irritable bowel syndrome. Eur. Rev. Med. Pharmacol. Sci. 2013, 17, 1314–1320. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Furnari, M.; Parodi, A.; Gemignani, L.; Giannini, E.G.; Marenco, S.; Savarino, E.; Assandri, L.; Fazio, V.; Bonfanti, D.; Inferrera, S.; et al. Clinical trial: The combination of rifaximin with partially hydrolysed guar gum is more effective than rifaximin alone in eradicating small intestinal bacterial overgrowth. Aliment. Pharmacol. Ther. 2010, 32, 1000–1006. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  59. Jo, I.H.; Paik, C.N.; Lee, J.M.; Song, D.S.; Kim, Y.J. Effect of Trimebutine and Rifaximin on Breath Hydrogen and Methane by Glucose Breath Test in Patients With Functional Bloating: A Randomized Double-blind Clinical Trial. J. Neurogastroenterol. Motil. 2024, 30, 220–228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  60. Boltin, D.; Perets, T.T.; Shporn, E.; Aizic, S.; Levy, S.; Niv, Y.; Dickman, R. Rifaximin for small intestinal bacterial overgrowth in patients without irritable bowel syndrome. Ann. Clin. Microbiol. Antimicrob. 2014, 13, 49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  61. Lauritano, E.C.; Gabrielli, M.; Scarpellini, E.; Lupascu, A.; Novi, M.; Sottili, S.; Vitale, G.; Cesario, V.; Serricchio, M.; Cammarota, G.; et al. Small intestinal bacterial overgrowth recurrence after antibiotic therapy. Am. J. Gastroenterol. 2008, 103, 2031–2035. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Richard, N.; Desprez, C.; Wuestenberghs, F.; Leroi, A.M.; Gourcerol, G.; Melchior, C. The effectiveness of rotating versus single course antibiotics for small intestinal bacterial overgrowth. United Eur. Gastroenterol. J. 2021, 9, 645–654. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Connor, B.A.; Rogova, M.; Garcia, J.; Gardner, M.; Waraich, C.; Averill, V. A randomized open label pilot study evaluating the efficacy of two dosing regimens of rifamycin SV MMX in the treatment of small intestinal bacterial overgrowth. BMC Gastroenterol. 2025, 25, 219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Pilipenko, V.I.; Isakov, V.A.; Morozov, S.V.; Vlasova, A.V.; Naydenova, M.A. Association of food patterns with different forms of small intestinal bacterial overgroth syndrome and treatment efficacy. Ter. Arkh 2019, 91, 82–90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Tahan, S.; Melli, L.C.; Mello, C.S.; Rodrigues, M.S.; Bezerra Filho, H.; de Morais, M.B. Effectiveness of trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole and metronidazole in the treatment of small intestinal bacterial overgrowth in children living in a slum. J. Pediatr. Gastroenterol. Nutr. 2013, 57, 316–318. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Bouchoucha, M.; Fysekidis, M.; Lekhal, C.; Bejou, B.D.; Sabate, J.M.; Benamouzig, R. COLIGENTA treatment of small intestinal bacterial overgrowth. Results of an open study. Dig. Liver Dis. 2021, 53, 66–71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  67. Di Stefano, M.; Malservisi, S.; Veneto, G.; Ferrieri, A.; Corazza, G.R. Rifaximin versus chlortetracycline in the short-term treatment of small intestinal bacterial overgrowth. Aliment. Pharmacol. Ther. 2000, 14, 551–556. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  68. Lauritano, E.C.; Gabrielli, M.; Scarpellini, E.; Ojetti, V.; Roccarina, D.; Villita, A.; Fiore, E.; Flore, R.; Santoliquido, A.; Tondi, P.; et al. Antibiotic therapy in small intestinal bacterial overgrowth: Rifaximin versus metronidazole. Eur. Rev. Med. Pharmacol. Sci. 2009, 13, 111–116. [Google Scholar]
  69. von Muhlenbrock, C.; Landskron, G.; Madrid, A.M. Treatment of small intestinal bacterial overgrowth in Chilean patients with irritable bowel syndrome: A prospective and comparative study. Rev. Gastroenterol. Mex. 2025, 90, 54–62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Pimentel, M.; Chow, E.J.; Lin, H.C. Normalization of lactulose breath testing correlates with symptom improvement in irritable bowel syndrome. a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled study. Am. J. Gastroenterol. 2003, 98, 412–419. [Google Scholar]
  71. Ghoshal, U.C.; Srivastava, D.; Misra, A.; Ghoshal, U. A proof-of-concept study showing antibiotics to be more effective in irritable bowel syndrome with than without small-intestinal bacterial overgrowth: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Eur. J. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2016, 28, 281–289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Khalighi, A.R.; Khalighi, M.R.; Behdani, R.; Jamali, J.; Khosravi, A.; Kouhestani, S.; Radmanesh, H.; Esmaeelzadeh, S.; Khalighi, N. Evaluating the efficacy of probiotic on treatment in patients with small intestinal bacterial overgrowth (SIBO)—A pilot study. Indian J. Med. Res. 2014, 140, 604–608. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  73. Attar, A.; Flourié, B.; Rambaud, J.C.; Franchisseur, C.; Ruszniewski, P.; Bouhnik, Y. Antibiotic efficacy in small intestinal bacterial overgrowth-related chronic diarrhea: A crossover, randomized trial. Gastroenterology 1999, 117, 794–797. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Tuteja, A.K.; Talley, N.J.; Stoddard, G.J.; Verne, G.N. Double-Blind Placebo-Controlled Study of Rifaximin and Lactulose Hydrogen Breath Test in Gulf War Veterans with Irritable Bowel Syndrome. Dig. Dis. Sci. 2019, 64, 838–845. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Collins, B.S.; Lin, H.C. Double-blind, placebo-controlled antibiotic treatment study of small intestinal bacterial overgrowth in children with chronic abdominal pain. J. Pediatr. Gastroenterol. Nutr. 2011, 52, 382–386. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  76. Trush, E.A.; Poluektova, E.A.; Beniashvilli, A.G.; Shifrin, O.S.; Poluektov, Y.M.; Ivashkin, V.T. The Evolution of Human Probiotics: Challenges and Prospects. Probiotics Antimicrob. Proteins 2020, 12, 1291–1299. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Ivashkin, V.T.; Gorelov, A.V.; Abdulganieva, D.I.; Alekseeva, O.P.; Alekseenko, S.A.; Baranovsky, A.Y.; Zakharova, I.N.; Zolnikova, O.Y.; Ivashkin, K.V.; Ivashkina, N.Y.; et al. Methodological Guidelines of the Scientific Community for Human Microbiome Research (CHMR) and the Russian Gastroenterology Association (RGA) on the Use of Probiotics, Prebiotics, Synbiotics, Metabiotics and Functional Foods Enriched with Them for the Treatment and Prevention of Gastrointestinal Diseases in Adults and Children. Russ. J. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. Coloproctology 2024, 34, 113–136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Ivashkin, V.T.; Drapkina, O.M.; Sheptulin, A.A.; Shifrin, O.S.; Poluektova, Y.A.; Kuchumova, S.Y. Comparative assessment of Bifidobacterium bifidum, Bifidobacterium longum, Bifidobacterium infantis, Lactobacillus rhamnosus and Saccharomyces boulardii efficacy at diarrheal variant of irritable bowel syndrome. Russ. J. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. Coloproctology 2015, 25, 10–21. [Google Scholar]
  79. Lee, S.H.; Joo, N.S.; Kim, K.M.; Kim, K.N. The Therapeutic Effect of a Multistrain Probiotic on Diarrhea-Predominant Irritable Bowel Syndrome: A Pilot Study. Gastroenterol. Res. Pract. 2018, 2018, 8791916. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  80. Shi, J.; Gao, F.; Zhang, J. Effect of Combined Live Probiotics Alleviating the Gastrointestinal Symptoms of Functional Bowel Disorders. Gastroenterol. Res. Pract. 2020, 2020, 4181748. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Ma, Z.F.; Yusof, N.; Hamid, N.; Lawenko, R.M.; Mohammad, W.M.Z.; Liong, M.T.; Sugahara, H.; Odamaki, T.; Xiao, J.; Lee, Y.Y. Bifidobacterium infantis M-63 improves mental health in victims with irritable bowel syndrome developed after a major flood disaster. Benef. Microbes 2019, 10, 111–120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Chedid, V.; Dhalla, S.; Clarke, J.O.; Roland, B.C.; Dunbar, K.B.; Koh, J.; Justino, E.; Tomakin, E.; Mullin, G.E. Herbal therapy is equivalent to rifaximin for the treatment of small intestinal bacterial overgrowth. Glob. Adv. Health Med. 2014, 3, 16–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Ivashkin, V.T.; Drapkina, O.M.; Sheptulin, A.A.; Shifrin, O.S.; Poluektova, Y.A.; Kuchumova, S.Y. Comparative efficacy of Bifidobacterium bifidum, Bifidobacterium longum, Bifidobacterium infantis, Lactobacillus rhamnosus composition and prucalopride in treatment of constipation variant of irritable bowel syndrome. Russ. J. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. Coloproctology 2015, 25, 21–32. [Google Scholar]
  84. Hong, J.T. Current Opinion on Prucalopride in Gastroparesis and Chronic Constipation Treatment: A Focus on Patient Selection and Safety. Ther. Clin. Risk Manag. 2021, 17, 601–615. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Rezaie, A.; Chang, B.W.; de Freitas Germano, J.; Leite, G.; Mathur, R.; Houser, K.; Hosseini, A.; Brimberry, D.; Rashid, M.; Mehravar, S.; et al. Effect, tolerability, and safety of exclusive palatable elemental diet in patients with intestinal microbial overgrowth. Clin. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2025, 23, 2306–2317.e7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Sarosiek, I.; Bashashati, M.; Alvarez, A.; Hall, M.; Shankar, N.; Gomez, Y.; McCallum, R.W.; Sarosiek, J. Lubiprostone Accelerates Intestinal Transit and Alleviates Small Intestinal Bacterial Overgrowth in Patients With Chronic Constipation. Am. J. Med. Sci. 2016, 352, 231–238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Petrisor, D.C.; Etropolska, Z.; Elenski, K.; Dimitrova, E.; Santos, J. Efficacy and Safety of Pea Protein and Xyloglucan Versus Simethicone in Functional Abdominal Bloating and Distension. Dig. Dis. Sci. 2024, 69, 161–168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  88. Lopresti, A.L.; Smith, S.J.; Rea, A.; Michel, S. Efficacy of a curcumin extract (Curcugen™) on gastrointestinal symptoms and intestinal microbiota in adults with self-reported digestive complaints: A randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. BMC Complement. Med. Ther. 2021, 21, 40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  89. Rana, S.V.; Sharma, S.; Malik, A.; Kaur, J.; Prasad, K.K.; Sinha, S.K.; Singh, K. Small intestinal bacterial overgrowth and orocecal transit time in patients of inflammatory bowel disease. Dig. Dis. Sci. 2013, 58, 2594–2598. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  90. Hah, A.; Morrison, M.; Burger, D.; Martin, N.; Rich, J.; Jones, M.; Koloski, N.; Walker, M.M.; Talley, N.J.; Holtmann, G.J. Systematic review with meta-analysis: The prevalence of small intestinal bacterial overgrowth in inflammatory bowel disease. Aliment. Pharmacol. Ther. 2019, 49, 624–635. [Google Scholar]
  91. Tursi, A.; Brandimarte, G.; Giorgetti, G.M.; Elisei, W. Transient lactose malabsorption in patients affected by symptomatic uncomplicated diverticular disease of the colon. Dig. Dis. Sci. 2006, 51, 461–465. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  92. Jo, I.H.; Paik, C.N.; Kim, Y.J.; Lee, J.M.; Choi, S.Y.; Hong, K.P. Lactase Deficiency Diagnosed by Endoscopic Biopsy-based Method is Associated With Positivity to Glucose Breath Test. J. Neurogastroenterol. Motil. 2023, 29, 85–93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Seddik, T.B.; Tian, L.; Nespor, C.; Kerner, J.; Maldonado, Y.; Gans, H. Risk Factors of Ambulatory Central Line-Associated Bloodstream Infection in Pediatric Short Bowel Syndrome. JPEN J. Parenter. Enter. Nutr. 2020, 44, 500–506. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Shah, A.; Thite, P.; Hansen, T.; Kendall, B.J.; Sanders, D.S.; Morrison, M.; Jones, M.P.; Holtmann, G. Links between celiac disease and small intestinal bacterial overgrowth: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2022, 37, 1844–1852. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Biancone, L.; Vernia, P.; Agostini, D.; Ferrieri, A.; Pallone, F. Effect of rifaximin on intestinal bacterial overgrowth in Crohn’s disease as assessed by the H2-Glucose Breath Test. Curr. Med. Res. Opin. 2000, 16, 14–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Castiglione, F.; Rispo, A.; Di Girolamo, E.; Cozzolino, A.; Manguso, F.; Grassia, R.; Mazzacca, G. Antibiotic treatment of small bowel bacterial overgrowth in patients with Crohn’s disease. Aliment. Pharmacol. Ther. 2003, 18, 1107–1112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. D’Incà, R.; Pomerri, F.; Vettorato, M.G.; Dal Pont, E.; Di Leo, V.; Ferronato, A.; Medici, V.; Sturniolo, G.C. Interaction between rifaximin and dietary fibre in patients with diverticular disease. Aliment. Pharmacol. Ther. 2007, 25, 771–779. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  98. Tursi, A.; Brandimarte, G.; Giorgetti, G.M.; Elisei, W. Assessment of small intestinal bacterial overgrowth in uncomplicated acute diverticulitis of the colon. World J. Gastroenterol. 2005, 11, 2773–2776. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  99. García-Cedillo, M.F.; Villegas-García, F.U.; Arenas-Martinez, J.S.; Ornelas-Arroyo, V.J.; Yamamoto-Furusho, J.K.; Estrella-Sato, L.A.; Coss-Adame, E. Rifaximin-Alpha Increases Lactase Activity in Patients with Irritable Bowel Syndrome Without Constipation and Small Intestinal Bacterial Overgrowth. Dig. Dis. Sci. 2025, 70, 360–366. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Velimirovic, M.; Osterman, V.; Prislan, A.; Pintar, T. Small Intestinal Bacterial Overgrowth in Children with Short Bowel Syndrome: Risk Factors, Clinical Presentation and Management—A Single-Center Experience. Children 2025, 12, 351. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Tursi, A.; Brandimarte, G.; Giorgetti, G. High prevalence of small intestinal bacterial overgrowth in celiac patients with persistence of gastrointestinal symptoms after gluten withdrawal. Am. J. Gastroenterol. 2003, 98, 839–843. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Chang, M.S.; Minaya, M.T.; Cheng, J.; Connor, B.A.; Lewis, S.K.; Green, P.H. Double-blind randomized controlled trial of rifaximin for persistent symptoms in patients with celiac disease. Dig. Dis. Sci. 2011, 56, 2939–2946. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  103. Ohkubo, H.; Kessoku, T.; Tanaka, K.; Takahashi, K.; Takatsu, T.; Yoshihara, T.; Misawa, N.; Ashikari, K.; Fuyuki, A.; Kato, S.; et al. Efficacy and safety of rifaximin in patients with chronic intestinal pseudo-obstruction: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase II—A exploratory trial. Biosci. Microbiota Food Health 2024, 43, 135–144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. Maslennikov, R.; Ivashkin, V.; Efremova, I.; Poluektova, E.; Shirokova, E. Gut-liver axis in cirrhosis: Are hemodynamic changes a missing link? World J. Clin. Cases 2021, 9, 9320–9332. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  105. Maslennikov, R.; Pavlov, C.; Ivashkin, V. Is small intestinal bacterial overgrowth a cause of hyperdynamic circulation in cirrhosis? Turk. J. Gastroenterol. 2019, 30, 964–975. [Google Scholar]
  106. Zhang, Y.; Feng, Y.; Cao, B.; Tian, Q. Effects of SIBO and rifaximin therapy on MHE caused by hepatic cirrhosis. Int. J. Clin. Exp. Med. 2015, 8, 2954–2957. [Google Scholar]
  107. Yokoyama, K.; Sakamaki, A.; Takahashi, K.; Naruse, T.; Sato, C.; Kawata, Y.; Tominaga, K.; Abe, H.; Sato, H.; Tsuchiya, A.; et al. Hydrogen-producing small intestinal bacterial overgrowth is associated with hepatic encephalopathy and liver function. PLoS ONE 2022, 17, e0264459. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Abid, S.; Kamran, M.; Abid, A.; Butt, N.; Awan, S.; Abbas, Z. Minimal Hepatic Encephalopathy: Effect of H. pylori infection and small intestinal bacterial overgrowth treatment on clinical outcomes. Sci. Rep. 2020, 10, 10079. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Lunia, M.K.; Sharma, B.C.; Sharma, P.; Sachdeva, S.; Srivastava, S. Probiotics prevent hepatic encephalopathy in patients with cirrhosis: A randomized controlled trial. Clin. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2014, 12, 1003–1008.e1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Li, Y.K.; Mou, F.Y.; Qian, X.X. Therapeutic efficacy of a probiotic preparation on idiopathic halitosis: A retrospective observational study. J. Breath. Res. 2024, 19, 016005. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. El Kurdi, B.; Babar, S.; El Iskandarani, M.; Bataineh, A.; Lerch, M.M.; Young, M.; Singh, V.P. Factors That Affect Prevalence of Small Intestinal Bacterial Overgrowth in Chronic Pancreatitis: A Systematic Review, Meta-Analysis, and Meta-Regression. Clin. Transl. Gastroenterol. 2019, 10, e00072. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  112. Trespi, E.; Ferrieri, A. Intestinal bacterial overgrowth during chronic pancreatitis. Curr. Med. Res. Opin. 1999, 15, 47–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  113. Wang, X.; Zhu, D.; Li, S.; Dai, Y.; Teng, G.; Wang, W. Influence of Helicobacter pylori Infection and Eradication on Small Intestinal Bacterial Overgrowth and Abdominal Symptoms. Dig. Dis. Sci. 2024, 69, 1293–1301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  114. Konrad, P.; Chojnacki, J.; Gąsiorowska, A.; Rudnicki, C.; Kaczka, A.; Chojnacki, C. Therapeutic efficacy of amoxicillin and rifaximin in patients with small intestinal bacterial overgrowth and Helicobacter pylori infection. Prz. Gastroenterol. 2018, 13, 213–217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  115. Kim, B.T.; Kim, K.M.; Kim, K.N. The Effect of Ursodeoxycholic Acid on Small Intestinal Bacterial Overgrowth in Patients with Functional Dyspepsia: A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial. Nutrients 2020, 12, 1410. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  116. DE Bastiani, R.; Lopetuso, L.R.; DE Bastiani, M.; Bacchin, P.; Benedetto, E.; Boscariolo, L.; Caneve, R.; Chesani, F.; Chiumeo, F.; Civic, Z.; et al. Assessment of small intestinal bacterial overgrowth and methane production in patients on chronic proton-pump inhibitor treatment: Prevalence and role of rifaximin in its management in primary care. Minerva Gastroenterol. 2023, 69, 523–528. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  117. Wagner, N.R.F.; Lopes, M.C.P.; Fernandes, R.; Taconelli, C.A.; Nascimento, G.M.; Pessini, J.; Trindade, E.B.S.M.; Campos, A.C.L. Effects of Probiotic Use on Gastrointestinal Symptoms in the Late Postoperative Period of Bariatric Surgery: A Cross-Over, Randomized, Triple-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study. Obes. Surg. 2024, 34, 1306–1315. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  118. Wagner, N.R.F.; Ramos, M.R.Z.; de Oliveira Carlos, L.; da Cruz, M.R.R.; Taconeli, C.A.; Filho, A.J.B.; Nassif, L.S.; Schieferdecker, M.E.M.; Campos, A.C.L. Effects of Probiotics Supplementation on Gastrointestinal Symptoms and SIBO after Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass: A Prospective, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial. Obes. Surg. 2021, 31, 143–150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  119. Mouillot, T.; Rhyman, N.; Gauthier, C.; Paris, J.; Lang, A.S.; Lepers-Tassy, S.; Manfredi, S.; Lepage, C.; Leloup, C.; Jacquin-Piques, A.; et al. Study of Small Intestinal Bacterial Overgrowth in a Cohort of Patients with Abdominal Symptoms Who Underwent Bariatric Surgery. Obes. Surg. 2020, 30, 2331–2337. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  120. Pérez Aisa, A.; García Gavilán, M.C.; Alcaide García, J.; Méndez Sánchez, I.M.; Rivera Irigoin, R.; Fernández Cano, F.; Pereda Salguero, T.; Rivas Ruiz, F. Small intestinal bacterial overgrowth is common after gastrectomy but with little impact on nutritional status. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2019, 42, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  121. Deng, L.; Liu, Y.; Zhang, D.; Li, Y.; Xu, L. Prevalence and treatment of small intestinal bacterial overgrowth in postoperative patients with colorectal cancer. Mol. Clin. Oncol. 2016, 4, 883–887. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  122. Shah, A.; Pakeerathan, V.; Jones, M.P.; Kashyap, P.C.; Virgo, K.; Fairlie, T.; Morrison, M.; Ghoshal, U.C.; Holtmann, G.J. Small Intestinal Bacterial Overgrowth Complicating Gastrointestinal Manifestations of Systemic Sclerosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. J. Neurogastroenterol. Motil. 2023, 29, 132–144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  123. García-Collinot, G.; Madrigal-Santillán, E.O.; Martínez-Bencomo, M.A.; Carranza-Muleiro, R.A.; Jara, L.J.; Vera-Lastra, O.; Montes-Cortes, D.H.; Medina, G.; Cruz-Domínguez, M.P. Effectiveness of Saccharomyces boulardii and Metronidazole for Small Intestinal Bacterial Overgrowth in Systemic Sclerosis. Dig. Dis. Sci. 2020, 65, 1134–1143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  124. Lisowska, A.; Pogorzelski, A.; Oracz, G.; Siuda, K.; Skorupa, W.; Rachel, M.; Cofta, S.; Piorunek, T.; Walkowiak, J. Oral antibiotic therapy improves fat absorption in cystic fibrosis patients with small intestine bacterial overgrowth. J. Cyst. Fibros. 2011, 10, 418–421. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  125. Furnari, M.; De Alessandri, A.; Cresta, F.; Haupt, M.; Bassi, M.; Calvi, A.; Haupt, R.; Bodini, G.; Ahmed, I.; Bagnasco, F.; et al. The role of small intestinal bacterial overgrowth in cystic fibrosis: A randomized case-controlled clinical trial with rifaximin. J. Gastroenterol. 2019, 54, 261–270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  126. Gabel, M.E.; Wang, H.; Gelfond, D.; Roach, C.; Rowe, S.M.; Clancy, J.P.; Sagel, S.D.; Borowitz, D. PROSPECT GIFT Sub-study Investigators of the Cystic Fibrosis Foundation Therapeutics Development Network. Changes in Glucose Breath Test in Cystic Fibrosis Patients Treated With 1 Month of Lumacaftor/Ivacaftor. J. Pediatr. Gastroenterol. Nutr. 2022, 75, 42–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  127. Lauritano, E.C.; Bilotta, A.L.; Gabrielli, M.; Scarpellini, E.; Lupascu, A.; Laginestra, A.; Novi, M.; Sottili, S.; Serricchio, M.; Cammarota, G.; et al. Association between hypothyroidism and small intestinal bacterial overgrowth. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2007, 92, 4180–4184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  128. Zhang, M.; Xu, Y.; Sun, Z.; Ban, Y.; Zhai, S.; Wang, W.; Wang, M.; You, J.; Chen, D.; Zhu, S.; et al. Evaluation of probiotics in the treatment of hypothyroidism in early pregnancy combined with small intestinal bacterial overgrowth. Food Sci. Nutr. 2024, 12, 2671–2678. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  129. Resmini, E.; Parodi, A.; Savarino, V.; Greco, A.; Rebora, A.; Minuto, F.; Ferone, D. Evidence of prolonged orocecal transit time and small intestinal bacterial overgrowth in acromegalic patients. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2007, 92, 2119–2124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed][Green Version]
  130. Parodi, A.; Sessarego, M.; Greco, A.; Bazzica, M.; Filaci, G.; Setti, M.; Savarino, E.; Indiveri, F.; Savarino, V.; Ghio, M. Small intestinal bacterial overgrowth in patients suffering from scleroderma: Clinical effectiveness of its eradication. Am. J. Gastroenterol. 2008, 103, 1257–1262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  131. Polkowska-Pruszyńska, B.; Gerkowicz, A.; Rawicz-Pruszyński, K.; Krasowska, D. Gut microbiome in systemic sclerosis: A potential therapeutic target. Postep. Dermatol. Alergol. 2022, 39, 101–109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  132. Polkowska-Pruszyńska, B.; Gerkowicz, A.; Rawicz-Pruszyński, K.; Krasowska, D. The Role of Fecal Calprotectin in Patients with Systemic Sclerosis and Small Intestinal Bacterial Overgrowth (SIBO). Diagnostics 2020, 10, 587. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  133. Fasano, A.; Bove, F.; Gabrielli, M.; Petracca, M.; Zocco, M.A.; Ragazzoni, E.; Barbaro, F.; Piano, C.; Fortuna, S.; Tortora, A.; et al. The role of small intestinal bacterial overgrowth in Parkinson’s disease. Mov. Disord. 2013, 28, 1241–1249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  134. Robinson-Papp, J.; Nmashie, A.; Pedowitz, E.; George, M.C.; Sharma, S.; Murray, J.; Benn, E.K.T.; Lawrence, S.A.; Machac, J.; Heiba, S.; et al. The effect of pyridostigmine on small intestinal bacterial overgrowth (SIBO) and plasma inflammatory biomarkers in HIV-associated autonomic neuropathies. J. Neurovirol. 2019, 25, 551–559. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  135. Gravina, A.; Federico, A.; Ruocco, E.; Lo Schiavo, A.; Masarone, M.; Tuccillo, C.; Peccerillo, F.; Miranda, A.; Romano, L.; de Sio, C.; et al. Helicobacter pylori infection but not small intestinal bacterial overgrowth may play a pathogenic role in rosacea. United Eur. Gastroenterol. J. 2015, 3, 17–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  136. Parodi, A.; Paolino, S.; Greco, A.; Drago, F.; Mansi, C.; Rebora, A.; Parodi, A.; Savarino, V. Small intestinal bacterial overgrowth in rosacea: Clinical effectiveness of its eradication. Clin. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2008, 6, 759–764. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  137. Chuah, K.H.; Loo, Q.Y.; Loh, A.J.C.; Leong, J.Y.; Chan, W.L.; Khoo, X.H.; Wong, K.L.; Panirsheeluam, S.; Natarajan, V.; Ng, A.K.; et al. Clinical Trial: Rifaximin Versus Low FODMAP Diet in Irritable Bowel Syndrome. Aliment. Pharmacol. Ther. 2026, 63, 210–221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  138. Gong, P.; Kang, T.; Wang, S.M.; Qian, X.X. Therapeutic effect of the low FODMAPs diet for refractory halitosis associated with small intestinal bacterial overgrowth. J. Breath Res. 2025, 19, 046007. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  139. Kuai, X.Y.; Yao, X.H.; Xu, L.J.; Zhou, Y.Q.; Zhang, L.P.; Liu, Y.; Pei, S.F.; Zhou, C.L. Evaluation of fecal microbiota transplantation in Parkinson’s disease patients with constipation. Microb. Cell Fact. 2021, 20, 98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  140. Xu, F.; Li, N.; Wang, C.; Xing, H.; Chen, D.; Wei, Y. Clinical efficacy of fecal microbiota transplantation for patients with small intestinal bacterial overgrowth: A randomized, placebo-controlled clinic study. BMC Gastroenterol. 2021, 21, 54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  141. Gu, L.; Ding, C.; Tian, H.; Yang, B.; Zhang, X.; Hua, Y.; Zhu, Y.; Gong, J.; Zhu, W.; Li, J.; et al. Serial Frozen Fecal Microbiota Transplantation in the Treatment of Chronic Intestinal Pseudo-obstruction: A Preliminary Study. J. Neurogastroenterol. Motil. 2017, 23, 289–297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. The principle of breath testing for small intestinal bacterial overgrowth.
Figure 1. The principle of breath testing for small intestinal bacterial overgrowth.
Medsci 14 00300 g001
Figure 2. Pathogenetic significance of small intestinal bacterial overgrowth.
Figure 2. Pathogenetic significance of small intestinal bacterial overgrowth.
Medsci 14 00300 g002
Table 1. Comparison of the efficacy of different rifaximin doses in the treatment of SIBO according to a recent meta-analysis [32].
Table 1. Comparison of the efficacy of different rifaximin doses in the treatment of SIBO according to a recent meta-analysis [32].
Rifaximin Dose, mg/dEradication Rate for SIBO, %
60045
80049
120064
160080
Table 4. The efficacy of rifaximin in the treatment of SIBO in functional bowel diseases based on randomized trials.
Table 4. The efficacy of rifaximin in the treatment of SIBO in functional bowel diseases based on randomized trials.
DoseComparatorSIBO Elimination Rate for Rifaximin and ComparatorConclusion: Rifaximin vs. ComparatorRef.
RCT without Placebo
1200 mg for 7 daysChlortetracycline 1000 mg for 7 days70% vs. 27%Superior[67]
Metronidazole 750 mg for 7 days63% vs. 44%Superior[68]
800 mg for 10 daysMetronidazole 1500 mg for 10 days59% vs. 79%Inferior[69]
Ciprofloxacin 1000 mg for 10 days59% vs. 54%Similar[69]
RCT with Placebo
1100 mg for 14 daysPlacebo13% vs. 18% *Similar[74]
1650 mg for 10 daysPlacebo20% vs. 14% **Similar[75]
Note: * Hydrogen SIBO, ** in children.
Table 6. The efficacy of different drugs in the treatment of SIBO in the context of cirrhosis.
Table 6. The efficacy of different drugs in the treatment of SIBO in the context of cirrhosis.
DrugDoseDesignSIBO Elimination RateRef.
Saccharomyces boulardii CNCM I-745500 mg for 3 monthspRCT80%[13]
Rifaximin600 mg for 7 daysuCS76%[106]
1200 mguCS67% *[107]
1200 mg for 7 daysuCS94%[108]
VSL#33 × 108 cells for 3 monthsRCTwoP57.6%[109]
Note: * very small study; pRCT-RCT, with placebo; RCTwoP-RCT, without placebo; uCS, uncontrolled study.
Table 7. Results of the treatment of SIBO in various non-digestive diseases.
Table 7. Results of the treatment of SIBO in various non-digestive diseases.
Underlying DiseaseDrugDose, mg/DayDuration, DaysSIBO Eradication Rate, %RCTReference
Cystic fibrosisRifaximin12001490Yes[125]
HypothyroidismRifaximin1200770No[127]
Hypothyroidism in early pregnancyBifidobacterium infantis, Lactobacillus acidophilus, Enterococcus faecalis, and Bacillus cereus45002171No[128]
AcromegalyRifaximin 12001053No[129]
Systemic sclerosisRifaximin 12001073No[130,131,132]
Parkinson’s diseaseRifaximin 1200778 *No[133]
HIV-associated autonomic neuropathiesPyridostigmine 905667No[134]
RosaceaRifaximin12001078No[135]
Rifaximin12001088Yes[136]
Note: * SIBO recurred in 43% (6/14) of patients 6 months after the end of therapy.
Table 8. Effects of SIBO eradication in various diseases.
Table 8. Effects of SIBO eradication in various diseases.
Underlying DiseaseEffects of SIBO EradicationReference
Cystic fibrosisImproved fat digestion and absorption[124]
HypothyroidismDecreased the severity of abdominal discomfort, bloating and flatulence; no effect on thyroid hormone serum levels[127]
AcromegalyImproved digestive symptoms[129]
Systemic sclerosisImproved digestive symptoms[130,131,132]
Parkinson’s diseaseImproved motor fluctuations without affecting the pharmacokinetics of levodopa[133]
RosaceaPartial or complete regression of skin symptoms[135,136]
Table 9. Current RCTs of SIBO treatments.
Table 9. Current RCTs of SIBO treatments.
StudyDiseaseIntervention
NCT07451171Functional bowel diseasesMetronidazole 20–30 mg/kg/day vs. trimethoprim–sulfamethoxazole 8–10 mg/kg/day + metronidazole 20–30 mg/kg/day vs. amoxicillin–clavulanate 20–40 kg/day for 14 days
NCT07424313Low FODMAP diet vs. healthy eating diet
NCT06317441Probiotic vs. placebo
NCT06721884Artemisia annua leaf vs. placebo
NCT07426705IBSProbiotic + rifaximin vs. placebo + rifaximin
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Maslennikov, R.; Agarkova, V.; Poluektova, E.; Ulyanin, A.; Zolnikova, O.; Kurbatova, A.; Kozlov, E.; Demina, T.; Zharikov, Y.; Sigidaev, A.; et al. Treatment of Small Intestinal Bacterial Overgrowth (SIBO) in Gastrointestinal, Hepatic, Endocrine, Neurological, and Postoperative Diseases: A Comprehensive Narrative Review. Med. Sci. 2026, 14, 300. https://doi.org/10.3390/medsci14020300

AMA Style

Maslennikov R, Agarkova V, Poluektova E, Ulyanin A, Zolnikova O, Kurbatova A, Kozlov E, Demina T, Zharikov Y, Sigidaev A, et al. Treatment of Small Intestinal Bacterial Overgrowth (SIBO) in Gastrointestinal, Hepatic, Endocrine, Neurological, and Postoperative Diseases: A Comprehensive Narrative Review. Medical Sciences. 2026; 14(2):300. https://doi.org/10.3390/medsci14020300

Chicago/Turabian Style

Maslennikov, Roman, Victoria Agarkova, Elena Poluektova, Anatoly Ulyanin, Oksana Zolnikova, Anastasia Kurbatova, Evgenii Kozlov, Tatyana Demina, Yury Zharikov, Alexey Sigidaev, and et al. 2026. "Treatment of Small Intestinal Bacterial Overgrowth (SIBO) in Gastrointestinal, Hepatic, Endocrine, Neurological, and Postoperative Diseases: A Comprehensive Narrative Review" Medical Sciences 14, no. 2: 300. https://doi.org/10.3390/medsci14020300

APA Style

Maslennikov, R., Agarkova, V., Poluektova, E., Ulyanin, A., Zolnikova, O., Kurbatova, A., Kozlov, E., Demina, T., Zharikov, Y., Sigidaev, A., & Ivashkin, V. (2026). Treatment of Small Intestinal Bacterial Overgrowth (SIBO) in Gastrointestinal, Hepatic, Endocrine, Neurological, and Postoperative Diseases: A Comprehensive Narrative Review. Medical Sciences, 14(2), 300. https://doi.org/10.3390/medsci14020300

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop