Previous Article in Journal
GIS-Based Sliding Surface Reconstruction for Rapid Landslide Volume Estimation
Previous Article in Special Issue
Identification and Application of Preferred Seepage Channels in Turbidite Lobe Reservoirs of Formation A in Z Oilfield
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
This is an early access version, the complete PDF, HTML, and XML versions will be available soon.
Article

3D Response Characteristics Analysis of Vertical Electric Dipole Transient Electromagnetic Fields Under Complex Geological Conditions

National Key Laboratory of Uranium Resources Exploration-Mining and Nuclear Remote Sensing, East China University of Technology, Nanchang 330013, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Geosciences 2026, 16(5), 206; https://doi.org/10.3390/geosciences16050206
Submission received: 20 March 2026 / Revised: 14 May 2026 / Accepted: 18 May 2026 / Published: 21 May 2026

Abstract

Vertical electric sources serve as an effective method for identifying deep hydrocarbon reservoirs. This involves the ability to generate transverse magnetic fields, concentrate currents at reservoir interfaces, and effectively emphasize resistivity anomalies in late-time domains. Marine geological conditions are often complex, marked by rugged topography and intricate structures. This complexity results in highly complicated electromagnetic response features, presenting significant challenges for data interpretation. This research employs the Time-Domain Finite Element Method (TDFEM) using unstructured meshes to accurately discretize complex geological models. Through the formulation of TDFEM equations, we successfully performed three-dimensional forward modeling of VED transient electromagnetic (VSTEM) responses in intricate geological environments. An analysis was conducted on the diffusion mechanisms and spatial distribution characteristics of VSTEM fields located beneath the seabed. A comparative analysis was conducted on the resolution capabilities of different fields stimulated by horizontal and VED sources. The findings show that the Ex provides enhanced boundary identification for the lateral extent of targets, whereas the Ez displays the greatest anomaly contrast, highlighting its exceptional results in anomaly detection. We investigated how complex seabed topography and geological structures affect the resolution of hydrocarbon targets. The research indicates that complex topography significantly influences electromagnetic fields; however, the proposed method can still effectively identify resistive hydrocarbon reservoirs, even in intricate model scenarios, thus confirming its reliability in challenging marine environments.
Keywords: vertical electric source; transient electromagnetic method; 3D forward modeling; complex seabed topography vertical electric source; transient electromagnetic method; 3D forward modeling; complex seabed topography

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Wang, X.; Hu, Z.; Li, S.; Sun, Q. 3D Response Characteristics Analysis of Vertical Electric Dipole Transient Electromagnetic Fields Under Complex Geological Conditions. Geosciences 2026, 16, 206. https://doi.org/10.3390/geosciences16050206

AMA Style

Wang X, Hu Z, Li S, Sun Q. 3D Response Characteristics Analysis of Vertical Electric Dipole Transient Electromagnetic Fields Under Complex Geological Conditions. Geosciences. 2026; 16(5):206. https://doi.org/10.3390/geosciences16050206

Chicago/Turabian Style

Wang, Xianxiang, Zefan Hu, Shanmei Li, and Qing Sun. 2026. "3D Response Characteristics Analysis of Vertical Electric Dipole Transient Electromagnetic Fields Under Complex Geological Conditions" Geosciences 16, no. 5: 206. https://doi.org/10.3390/geosciences16050206

APA Style

Wang, X., Hu, Z., Li, S., & Sun, Q. (2026). 3D Response Characteristics Analysis of Vertical Electric Dipole Transient Electromagnetic Fields Under Complex Geological Conditions. Geosciences, 16(5), 206. https://doi.org/10.3390/geosciences16050206

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop