Prospective Study on Geosciences On-Line Education: UNESCO Global Geoparks in Spain and Portugal
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Objectives
- Promote the UGGps as essential and safe territories for the current educational model.
- Enhance the visibility and presence of the educational potential of these territories within the educative and scientific community.
- Understand the current panorama and discuss possible paths towards the educational future of the UGGps.
3. Context and Current Situation
“The walks through the almost Martian landscape of the Canary Island of Lanzarote have allowed the students of the Pangaea course to interpret the geological phenomena to understand the history of the formation of the island. Its goal is to help astronauts choose the best places to explore and collect rock samples” (ESA, 2022).
- a.
- Being able to be known by your targets, that is, by your potential audience, the people who want to be known.
- b.
- Able to be differentiated from the rest of the professionals who may compete with you.
- c.
- Have the possibility of positioning yourself as an expert in your specialty.
- d.
- Favor the perception by others as a leader and facilitate the possession of effective networking.
- e.
- Help find partners and collaborators for new projects.
- f.
- Create many new opportunities related directly or not to your profession.
- g.
- Find new lines of professional activity, or recent partners and clients.
4. Methodology
5. Categories Description
5.1. Defined Educational Project
5.2. Educational Programs
5.3. Schools Go to the UGGps
5.4. The UGGps Goes to Schools
5.5. UGGps Pet/Mascot
5.6. Educational Methodologies
5.7. Complementary Educational Initiatives
5.8. Downloadable Educational Documents
5.9. Educational Audiovisuals
5.10. Primary, Secondary and University Education Programs
5.11. Background—Past Courses
5.12. Programs for Geosciences
5.13. Educational Programs on Other Topics
6. Results
7. Discussion
8. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Data Availability Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Fernández Álvarez, R. Los geoparques como recurso para la enseñanza-aprendizaje del espacio geográfico en Educación Primaria: El paisaje de las áreas de montaña. Didáctica Geográfica 2019, 20, 27–53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rocha Da Silva, E.M. The Contribution of the European UNESCO Global Geoparks for the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development—A Study Based on Several Data Sources; Universidade NOVA de Lisboa: Lisbon, Portugal, 2020. [Google Scholar]
- Rosado-González, E.M.; Sá, A.A.; Palacio-Prieto, J.L. UNESCO Global Geoparks in Latin America and the Caribbean, and Their Contribution to Agenda 2030 Sustainable Development Goals. Geoheritage 2020, 12, 36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Henriques, M.H.; Tomaz, C.; Sá, A.A. The Arouca Geopark (Portugal) as an educational resource: A case study. Episodes 2012, 35, 481–488. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Rodrigues, J. Pedagogical Geosciences tools to explain Naturtejo Geopark in both non-formal and formal environments. In Libro de Ponencias II Conferencia del Proyecto Geoschools: Geología y Sociedade: Alfabetización Geocientífica; Publicaciones del Seminário de Paleontologia de Zaragoza; Universidad de Zaragoza: Zaragoza, Spain, 2012. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- UNESCO. What is a UNESCO global geopark? 2022. Available online: http://www.globalgeopark.org/aboutGGN/6398.htm (accessed on 19 February 2022).
- Jones, C. History of Geoparks. Geol. Soc. Lond. Spéc. Publ. 2008, 300, 273–277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Blanco, C.M.-C.; Castro, A.B.S. El muestreo en la investigación cualitativa. NURE Investig. Rev. Científica Enfermería 2007, 27, 1–4. [Google Scholar]
- Bonilla-Guachamín, J.A. Las dos caras de la educación en el COVID-19. CienciAmérica 2020, 9, 89–98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Martini, B.G.; Zouros, N.; Zhang, J.; Jin, X.; Komoo, I.; Border, M.; Watanabe, M.; Frey, M.L.; Rangnes, K.; Van, T.T.; et al. UNESCO Global Geoparks in the "World after": A multiplegoals roadmap proposal for future discussion. Episodes 2022, 45, 29–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Henriques, M.H.; Canales, M.L.; García-Frank, A.; Gomez-Heras, M. Accessible Geoparks in Iberia: A Challenge to Promote Geotourism and Education for Sustainable Development. Geoheritage 2019, 11, 471–484. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Reuben, R. The Use of Social Media in Higher Education for Marketing and Communications: A Guide for Professionals in Higher Education. 2008. Available online: https://rachelreuben.com/2008/08/19/social-media-uses-higher-education-marketing-communication/ (accessed on 22 April 2022).
- Maignan, I.; Lukas, B.A. The Nature and Social Uses of the Internet: A Qualitative Investigation. J. Consum. Aff. 1997, 31, 346–371. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Aires, L.; Dias, P.; Azevedo, J.; Rebollo, M.; García-Perez, R. Education, digital inclusion and sustainable online communities. In E-Learning and Education for Sustainability; Azeiteiro, U.M., Leal Filho, W., Caeiro, S.S., Eds.; Peter Lang D. International Academic Publishers: Bern, Switzerland, 2014; pp. 263–273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hellqvist, M. Teaching Sustainability in Geoscience Field Education at Falun Mine World Heritage Site in Sweden. Geoheritage 2019, 11, 1785–1798. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Locke, S.; Libarkin, J.; Chang, C.-Y. Geoscience Education and Global Development. J. Geosci. Educ. 2012, 60, 199–200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Stewart, I. Sustainable geoscience. Nat. Geosci. 2016, 9, 262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Vasconcelos, C. (Ed.) Geoscience Education; Springer International Publishing: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2016. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gardner, H. How education changes. In Globalization: Culture and Education in the New Millennium; University of California Press: Oakland, CA, USA, 2004; pp. 235–258. [Google Scholar]
- Sun, A.; Chen, X. Online Education and Its Effective Practice: A Research Review. J. Inf. Technol. Educ. Res. 2016, 15, 157–190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Abarzúa, A.; Cerda, C. Integración curricular de TIC en educación parvularia. Rev. Pedagog. 2011, 32, 13–43. [Google Scholar]
- García Sánchez, M.d.R.; Reyes Añorve, J.; Godínez Alarcón, G. Las Tic en la educación superior, innovaciones y retos [The ICT in higher education, innovations and challenges]. RICSH Rev. Iberoam. Cienc. Soc. Hum. 2017, 6, 299–316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- García-Peñalvo, F.J.; Corell, A.; Abella-García, V.; Grande, M. La evaluación online en la educación superior en tiempos de la COVID-19. Educ. Knowl. Soc. 2020, 21, 26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Adell Segura, J.; Sales Ciges, A. El profesor online: Elementos para la definición de un nuevo rol docente. In Proceedings of the IV Congreso de Nuevas Tecnologías de la Información y de la Comunicación para la Educación. Nuevas Tecnologías en la Formación Flexible y a Distancia, Seville, Spain, 14–17 September 1999; Universidad de Sevilla; Secretariado de Recursos Audiovisuales y Nuevas Tecnologías: Seville, Spain, 1999; pp. 1–15. [Google Scholar]
- Ferrada-Bustamante, V.; González-Oro, N.; Ibarra-Caroca, M.; Vergara-Correa, D.; Castillo-Retamal, F.; Ried-Donaire, A. Formación docente en TIC y su evidencia en tiempos de COVID-19. Rev. Saberes Educ. 2021, 6, 144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sandoval, C.H. La Educación en Tiempo del Covid-19 Herramientas TIC: El Nuevo Rol Docente en el Fortalecimiento del Proceso Enseñanza Aprendizaje de las Prácticas Educativa Innovadoras. Rev. Tecnológica 2020, 9, 24–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Silva, E.; Sá, A.A. Educational challenges in the Portuguese UNESCO Global Geoparks: Contributing for the implementation of the SDG 4. Int. J. Geoheritage Park. 2018, 6, 95–106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- González Tejada, C.; Girault, Y. Los Geoparques Mundiales de la UNESCO en España: Entre divulgación científica y desarrollo turístico. Cuad. Geográficos 2021, 60, 255–274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Martínez, J.E.; Mariñoso, P.E. Timanfaya lava flows geosite: A historical and educational approach. Int. J. Earth Sci. 2020, 109, 2697–2698. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Martínez-Frías, J.; Mateo, E. Lanzarote: Mars on Earth. In Lanzarote and Chinijo Islands Geopark: From Earth to Space; Mateo, E., Martínez-Frías, J., Vegas, J., Eds.; Springer International Publishing: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2019; pp. 143–148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Martínez Frías, J.; Mateo Mederos, M.; Lunar Hernández, R. Los geoparques como áreas de investigación, geoeducación y geoética en geociencias planetarias: El geoparque de Lanzarote y Archipiélago Chinijo. Geotemas 2016, 16, 343. [Google Scholar]
- Catana, M.M.; Brilha, J.B. The Role of UNESCO Global Geoparks in Promoting Geosciences Education for Sustainability. Geoheritage 2020, 12, 1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Farsani, N.T.; Coelho, C.; Costa, C.; Neto de Carvalho, C. (Eds.) Geoparks and Geotourism—New Approaches to Sustainability for the XXI Century; BrownWalker Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2012. [Google Scholar]
- Fassoulas, C.; Nikolakakis, E.; Staridas, S. Digital Tools to Serve Geotourism and Sustainable Development at Psiloritis UNESCO Global Geopark in COVID Times and Beyond. Geosciences 2022, 12, 78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Farsani, N.T.; Coelho, C.O.A.; Costa, C.; Amrikazemi, A. Geo-knowledge Management and Geoconservation via Geoparks and Geotourism. Geoheritage 2014, 6, 185–192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rowley, J. Online branding. Online Inf. Rev. 2004, 28, 131–138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bansal, M.; Sharma, D. Improving webpage visibility in search engines by enhancing keyword density using improved on-page optimization technique. Int. J. Comput. Sci. Inf. Technol. 2015, 6, 5347–5352. [Google Scholar]
- Fernández-Cavia, J.; Fabra, B.U.P.; Castro, D. Comunicación y branding en los sitios web nacionales de turismo. Cuad. Info 2015, 37, 167–185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Berry, L.H. Cognitive effects of web page design. In Instructional and Cognitive Impacts of Web-Based Education; IGI Global: Hershey, PA, USA, 2000; pp. 41–55. [Google Scholar]
- Pérez-Ortega, A. Marca Personal: Cómo Convertirse en la Opción Preferente; ESIC: New Delhi, India, 2008. [Google Scholar]
- Powell, T.A.; Jones, D.L.; Cutts, D.C. Web Site Engineering: Beyond Web Page Design; Prentice-Hall, Inc.: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 1998. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cantone, D. Como Elaborar tu Estrategia de Personal Branding Paso a Paso. 2011. Available online: Http://Davidcantone.Com/About (accessed on 16 March 2022).
- Climent-Rodríguez, J.-A.; Navarro-Abal, Y. Branding y reputación: Pilares básicos de la visibilidad online del profesor de educación superior. Rev. Iberoam. Educ. Super. 2017, 8, 66–76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Vanegas, C.A.; Pinzón Núñez, S.A. Accesibilidad en el diseño de páginas web. Vinculos 2012, 9, 177–190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cuberos, R.C.; Sánchez, M.C.; Ortega, F.Z.; Garcés, T.E.; Martínez, A.M. Videojuegos activos como recurso TIC en el aula de Educación Física: Estudio a partir de parámetros de ocio digital-Active Videogames as ICT tool in Physical Education classroom: Research from digital leisure parameters. Digit. Educ. Rev. 2016, 29, 112–123. [Google Scholar]
- Brilha, J.B.R.; Legoinha, P.A.R.; Butler, J. The Internet and the Geology teaching in Portugal. Comput. Geosci. 1999, 25, 205–206. [Google Scholar]
- Pereira, D.I.; Ramos, I.; Medina, W. Are Geoparks webpages attractive to potential tourists? Some results of an evaluation procedure. In Proceedings of the International Congress Arouca 2011 Geotourism in Action, Arouca, Portugal, 9–13 November 2011; 2011; pp. 159–161. Available online: http://hdl.handle.net/1822/15202 (accessed on 10 April 2022).
- Adams, D. Defining educational quality. Improv. Educ. Qual. Proj. Publ. 1993, 1, 1–24. [Google Scholar]
- Glumac, O.; D’Arcy, G.; de Sousa Morais, M.R.C. Co-creation and Co-design of Educational Programmes with Young People: A Comparative Study Between Dublin and Porto. In Perspectives on Design II; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2022; pp. 61–76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lin, J.-C.; Su, S.-J. Environmental Education for Geoparks—Practices and Challenges. In Geoparks of Taiwan; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2019; pp. 105–118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Del Mazo, I.; Bonilla Leo, A.; Carnicer Corchero, M.d.P.; Caro López, M.C.; García Iglesias, S.; Gil Pacheco, M.I.; Gordillo Valenzuela, J.; Jara Álvarez, P.; Muñoz Calderón, C.; Parejo Sánchez, A.; et al. Geopaca Folk: Rustic Performance on the Road. 2020. Available online: https://hdl.handle.net/11162/206523 (accessed on 16 March 2022).
- Velaz Sánchez, M.; Gándara Carretero, I.; Bonilla Leo, A. Geopaca: De Mascota a Influencer. 2019. Available online: https://hdl.handle.net/11162/201744 (accessed on 13 May 2022).
- Rodrigues, J.; de Carvalho, C.N.; Ramos, M.; Ramos, R.; Vinagre, A.; Vinagre, H. Geoproducts—Innovative development strategies in UNESCO Geoparks: Concept, implementation methodology, and case studies from Naturtejo Global Geopark, Portugal. Int. J. Geoheritage Parks 2021, 9, 108–128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kim, J.Y.; Fienup, D.M. Increasing Access to Online Learning for Students with Disabilities During the COVID-19 Pandemic. J. Spéc. Educ. 2022, 55, 213–221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pattier, D. Teachers and Youtube: The use of video as an educational resource. Ric. Pedagog. Didatt. J. Theor. Res. Educ. 2021, 16, 59–77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, J.; Zouros, N. Educational Activities in Fangshan UNESCO Global Geopark and Lesvos Island UNESCO Global Geopark. Geoheritage 2021, 13, 51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pujadas, F.J.C. Impacto de las nuevas tecnologías en la masificación de la educación. Rev. Sci. 2019, 4, 173–187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Correa, R.I. La sociedad mesmerizada: Medios, nuevas tecnologías y conciencia crítica en educación. In La Sociedad Mesmerizada; Universidad de Huelva: Huelva, Spain, 2019. [Google Scholar]
- Varela-Ordorica, S.A.; Valenzuela-González, J.R. Uso de las tecnologías de la información y la comunicación como competencia transversal en la formación inicial de docentes. Rev. Electrónica Educ. 2020, 24, 1–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Marte-Espinal, R. Uso de las tecnologías en la educación. In Revista: Atlante. Cuadernos de Educación y Desarrollo; Universidad de Málaga: Malaga, Spain, 2017; pp. 1–9. [Google Scholar]
- Cortés, F.P.; Rebolledo, A.M.; Zamorano, P.G.; Ossandón, J.M.; Montaña, A.; Obreque, M.K.; Castro, G.R.; Oñate, J.J.; Ulloa, M.E.; Kuschel, P.H. El geo-parque virtual y los módulos de aprendizaje: Una propuesta de aprendizaje sobre los riesgos naturales. In Nuevas Ideas en Informátíca Educativa Memorias del XVII Congreso Internacional de Informática Educativa; TISE: Santiago, Chile, 2012; pp. 434–440. [Google Scholar]
- Hincapié Montoya, M.; Valencia-Arias, A.; Fernandez, J.; Cuéllar Rojas, Ó. Aplicaciones de Realidad Aumentada y Realidad Virtual en Geociencias: Un análisis bibliométrico. In Un Análisis de los Campos de la Ingeniería: Usos y Aplicaciones; Americana: Barranquilla, Colombia, 2020; pp. 95–109. [Google Scholar]
- Lege, R.; Bonner, E. Virtual reality in education: The promise, progress, and challenge. JALT CALL J. 2020, 16, 167–180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Flores Tena, M.; Ortega Navas, M.C.; Sánchez Fuster, M.C. Las nuevas tecnologías como estrategias innovadoras de enseñanza-aprendizaje en la era digital. Rev. Electrónica Interuniv. Profr 2021, 24, 29–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Elmqaddem, N. Augmented Reality and Virtual Reality in Education. Myth or Reality? Int. J. Emerg. Technol. Learn. 2019, 14, 234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pereira, D.; da Gama, K.S.; Silveira, C.B.d.M.; Dias e Cordeiro, I. Creación de un prototipo y test de una aplicación para la gamificación de la visita al geoparque de Araripe (Ceará-Brasil). Estud. Perspect. Tur. 2019, 28, 1021–1031. [Google Scholar]
- Monasterio, D.; Briceño, M. Educación mediada por las Tecnologías: Un desafío ante la coyuntura del COVID-19. Obs. Conoc. 2020, 5, 100–108. [Google Scholar]
SDG4 Targets | Indicators |
---|---|
4.1 By 2030, ensure that all girls and boys complete free, equitable and quality primary and secondary education leading to relevant and effective learning outcomes. | Proportion of children and young people (a) in grades 2/3; (b) at the end of primary; and (c) at the end of lower secondary achieving at least a minimum proficiency level in (i) reading and (ii) mathematics, by sex and completion rate (primary education, lower secondary education, upper secondary education). |
4.2 By 2030, ensure that all girls and boys have access to quality early childhood development, care and pre-primary education so that they are ready for primary education. | Proportion of children aged 24–59 months who are developmentally on track in health, learning and psychosocial well-being, by sex and participation rate in organized learning (one year before the official primary entry age). |
4.3 By 2030, ensure equal access for all women and men to affordable and quality technical, vocational and tertiary education, including university. | Participation rate of youth and adults in formal and non-formal education and training in the previous 12 months, by sex. |
4.4 By 2030, substantially increase the number of youth and adults who have relevant skills, including technical and vocational skills, for employment, decent jobs and entrepreneurship. | Proportion of youth and adults with information and communications technology (ICT) skills, by type of skill. |
4.5 By 2030, eliminate gender disparities in education and ensure equal access to all levels of education and vocational training for the vulnerable, including persons with disabilities, indigenous peoples and children in vulnerable situations. | Parity indices (female/male, rural/urban, bottom/top wealth quintile and others such as disability status, indigenous peoples and conflict-affected, as data become available) for all education indicators on this list that can be disaggregated. |
4.6 By 2030, ensure that all youth and a substantial proportion of adults, both men and women, achieve literacy and numeracy. | Proportion of population in a given age group achieving at least a fixed level of proficiency in functional (a) literacy and (b) numeracy skills, by sex. |
4.7 By 2030, ensure that all learners acquire the knowledge and skills needed to promote sustainable development, including, among others, through education for sustainable development and sustainable lifestyles, human rights, gender equality, promotion of a culture of peace and non-violence, global citizenship and appreciation of cultural diversity and of culture’s contribution to sustainable development. | Extent to which (i) global citizenship education and (ii) education for sustainable development are mainstreamed in (a) national education policies; (b) curricula; (c) teacher education and (d) student assessment. |
4.a Build and upgrade education facilities that are child, disability and gender sensitive and provide safe, non-violent, inclusive and effective learning environments for all. | Proportion of schools offering basic services, by type of service. |
4.b By 2020, substantially expand globally the number of scholarships available to developing countries, in particular least developed countries, small-island developing states and African countries, for enrolment in higher education, including vocational training and information and communications technology, technical, engineering and scientific programs, in developed countries and other developing countries. | Volume of official development assistance flows for scholarships by sector and type of study. |
4.c By 2030, substantially increase the supply of qualified teachers, including through international cooperation for teacher training in developing countries, especially least developed countries and small-island developing states. | Proportion of teachers with the minimum required qualifications, by education level. |
Spanish UGGps | Declaration Year |
---|---|
Maestrazgo Cultural Park Cabo de Gata—Nijar Sierras Subbéticas | 2000 2001 2006 |
Sobrarbe—Pirineos | 2006 |
Basque Coast | 2010 |
Sierra Norte de Sevilla | 2011 |
Villuercas-Ibores-Jara | 2011 |
Cataluña Central | 2012 |
Molina & Alto Tajo | 2014 |
El Hierro | 2014 |
Lanzarote and Chinijo Islands | 2015 |
Las Loras | 2017 |
Origens | 2018 |
Courel Mountains | 2019 |
Granada | 2020 |
Portuguese UGGps | Declaration Year |
---|---|
Naturtejo | 2006 |
Arouca | 2009 |
Azores | 2013 |
Terras de Cavaleiros | 2014 |
Serra de Estrela | 2019 |
Quantified Variables |
---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2023 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Martínez-Martín, J.E.; Ester Mariñoso, P.; Rosado-González, E.M.; Sá, A.A. Prospective Study on Geosciences On-Line Education: UNESCO Global Geoparks in Spain and Portugal. Geosciences 2023, 13, 22. https://doi.org/10.3390/geosciences13020022
Martínez-Martín JE, Ester Mariñoso P, Rosado-González EM, Sá AA. Prospective Study on Geosciences On-Line Education: UNESCO Global Geoparks in Spain and Portugal. Geosciences. 2023; 13(2):22. https://doi.org/10.3390/geosciences13020022
Chicago/Turabian StyleMartínez-Martín, Jesús Enrique, Pilar Ester Mariñoso, Emmaline M. Rosado-González, and Artur A. Sá. 2023. "Prospective Study on Geosciences On-Line Education: UNESCO Global Geoparks in Spain and Portugal" Geosciences 13, no. 2: 22. https://doi.org/10.3390/geosciences13020022
APA StyleMartínez-Martín, J. E., Ester Mariñoso, P., Rosado-González, E. M., & Sá, A. A. (2023). Prospective Study on Geosciences On-Line Education: UNESCO Global Geoparks in Spain and Portugal. Geosciences, 13(2), 22. https://doi.org/10.3390/geosciences13020022