1. Introduction
In the plate tectonic cycle, oceanic crust is continuously subducted and remixed into the mantle. Along with basaltic oceanic crust, a layer of sediments with highly variable thickness (up to 300–500 m) is recycled to mantle depths [
1]. Rising pressure and temperature during burial drives progressive metamorphism of the sediments and hydrothermally altered oceanic crust, causing the release of fluids [
2]. Partial melting of the subducted sedimentary material begins at temperatures >675 °C, depending on the pressure and chemical composition of the sediment [
3,
4]. Partial melts of the subducted and metamorphosed sedimentary rocks eventually separate from their source, rise, react with, and hybridize the mantle wedge beneath arcs to generate subduction-related magmatism [
5]. These arc magmas are generally known for their strong depletion in high field strength elements (HFSE), which is commonly attributed to residual rutile during sediment de-volatilization, trace element filtering by amphibole in the mantle wedge [
6], mantle-magma interaction [
7], or multiple melt-depletion events [
8].
A plethora of studies have been conducted on subduction zone and arc magmatism that can be summarized as showing that the mantle wedge beneath arcs can be divided into three domains (
Figure 1). First, the cool region of the fore-arc mantle is metasomatized by hydrous fluids to form serpentinite, as evident from geophysical studies and the abundance of serpentinite in fore-arc seamounts [
9,
10,
11,
12] (D,
Figure 1A). Second, the deeper, hotter part of the fore-arc mantle contains phlogopite-bearing pyroxenites, formed by infiltration and reaction of sediment-derived hydrous melts that can be activated through slab-rollback [
13]. Finally, arc magma forms by flux-melting of peridotite within the convecting asthenospheric mantle wedge (
Figure 1A).
Many studies have suggested that phlogopite will be stabilized within the mantle wedge [
14,
15,
16,
17,
18], but the extent of this metasomatized zone remains unclear. These phlogopite-bearing pyroxenites are a likely source for post-collisional lavas of exotic potassic to ultrapotassic composition which are strongly enriched in large ion lithophile elements (LILE), high field strength elements (HFSE), and rare earth elements (REE) [
19,
20,
21,
22]. The formation of phlogopite pyroxenites within the fore-arc mantle is reported from Mexico [
23] and is probably a common phenomenon in subduction zones [
14], though only visible when activity shifts from the arc into the fore-arc and potassic magmas are erupted.
Most studies have focused on the magmatic arc (
Figure 1A), where models suggest magmas are formed either by melting of peridotite fluxed by volatiles and melts of sediments [
24,
25,
26] or mélange [
5]. While high-pressure studies [
5] reproduce the low HFSE contents of arc magmas by concentrating these elements in an HFSE-enriched residue, experimental designs have not considered the loss of trace elements during fore-arc metamorphism and metasomatism that occurs before the sediment and/or mélange component reaches the sub-arc zone. Eclogites depleted in LILE, HFSE, and LREE have been reported [
27] and interpreted as residues of fluid metasomatism beneath the volcanic arc. However, the occurrence of LILE, HFSE, and REE-enriched ultrapotassic magmas [
13,
23] sourced from the metasomatized fore-arc mantle, strongly suggest that subducted sedimentary components experience depletion of these elements before they reach the common depths of arc magma sources (100–130 km) [
2]. Therefore, the sediment-derived components of arc magmas are supplied by the residues of partially melted sediments and not the unmodified sediments as commonly assumed. This focuses attention on a gap in earlier research indicated by a ‘?’ in
Figure 1, namely experiments on the interaction between sedimentary rocks and peridotite in the fore-arc of subduction zones where pressures <3 GPa and temperatures below the wet solidus of peridotite (1000 °C, [
28]) prevail. Depending on the rate of subduction and the age of the subducting crust, slab-surface temperatures reach >675 °C in the fore-arc (white arrow,
Figure 1) [
18,
29], and therefore, subducted sedimentary components may partially devolatilize and melt to infiltrate and metasomatize the lithospheric mantle in the fore-arc. Element fractionation during these fore-arc processes will change the fundamental geochemical character of the sedimentary component that proceeds to depths where arc magmas form.
Figure 1.
Cross section of a subduction zone and the region of fore-arc mantle metasomatism. (
A) A–D show pathways of fluid migration at >30 km in front of the volcanic zone as evident from magnetotelluric observations. Reprinted by permission from Springer Nature, Nature, Pathway from subducting slab to surface for melt and fluids beneath Mount Rainier [
30] ©2014. (
B) At >675 °C [
4] (white arrow), sediment-derived volatile-bearing partial melts of dacitic-rhyolitic composition (
Figure 2) infiltrate the lithospheric fore-arc mantle at the location of the ‘?’ in front of the wet solidus isotherm of peridotite (blue line, [
28]). Arc magmas form in the hot part of the mantle wedge (
A) where temperatures are high enough to allow for the fluid- and sediment-fluxed (black arrow) melting of the asthenosphere.
Figure 1.
Cross section of a subduction zone and the region of fore-arc mantle metasomatism. (
A) A–D show pathways of fluid migration at >30 km in front of the volcanic zone as evident from magnetotelluric observations. Reprinted by permission from Springer Nature, Nature, Pathway from subducting slab to surface for melt and fluids beneath Mount Rainier [
30] ©2014. (
B) At >675 °C [
4] (white arrow), sediment-derived volatile-bearing partial melts of dacitic-rhyolitic composition (
Figure 2) infiltrate the lithospheric fore-arc mantle at the location of the ‘?’ in front of the wet solidus isotherm of peridotite (blue line, [
28]). Arc magmas form in the hot part of the mantle wedge (
A) where temperatures are high enough to allow for the fluid- and sediment-fluxed (black arrow) melting of the asthenosphere.
In this study, we employ the novel technique of laser ablation-inductively coupled plasma-time of flight-mass spectrometry (LA-ICP-TOFMS) element mapping to visualize and quantify the redistribution of trace elements in high-pressure experiments [
31]. The experiments simulate sediment subduction and subduction-related metasomatism within the fore-arc before the sediment enters arc magmatic processes. The trace element mapping has been conducted mainly on well pre-characterized published experiments [
32,
33,
34] that include the reaction of clastic, hydrous and carbonate-bearing sediments from the Mediterranean Sea from the International Ocean Discovery Project (IODP) site ODP 161-976 with depleted peridotite (dunite: containing >97% olivine, ~2% spinel, and <1% clinopyroxene) from the Zedang ophiolite (south Tibet, Zedang, China) at 2–6 GPa and 750–1100 °C.
2. Materials and Methods
The experiments used sediment from the International Ocean Discovery Project (ODP 161–976 B 18 X3 105–106.5), which is a hydrated (<1.5%), carbonate-bearing (<10%) siliciclastic marine sediment (
Table A2) with a composition close to globally subducted sediment [
1]. The depleted peridotite is a clinopyroxene-bearing dunite (sample ZD11–53) containing olivine (>97%), spinel (~2%), and clinopyroxene (<1%) from the Zedang ophiolite (south Tibet, China). It occurs as a lens-shaped body within harzburgite (
Table 1). While dunite may be a subordinate lithology of the fore-arc mantle [
35], it has been chosen since it is essentially monomineralic (>97% olivine) and thus easily enables the recognition of metasomatic phases that grow during the experiments.
Experiments were carried out using a piston cylinder-apparatus (1–3 GPa) at the University of Mainz, and a belt apparatus (4–6 GPa) at the University of Frankfurt. Sediment and peridotite were powdered and placed as separate layers in an inner carbon capsule (which controls fO
2 via the C + CO equilibrium) inside an outer platinum capsule. For the piston cylinder experiments, the experimental assembly consisted of a pressure cell made of Al
2O
3 spacers, a graphite furnace, B-type thermocouple, and sintered CaF
2 spacer outside the capsule. In the belt apparatus experiments, the materials used were similar to piston-cylinder experiments, but the spacer and capsule holder consisted of natural polycrystalline calcium fluoride. All cell assemblies were first pressurized and subsequently heated at a rate of 50 °C/min. Thermobaric conditions were kept constant for 2–14 days. Charges were quenched at the end of the experiment by switching off the heating. The piston-cylinder apparatus contains extra cooling channels in the bomb plate which aid rapid quenching [
36]: quench times to temperatures below 500 °C were 6 s for the piston-cylinder runs, and 8 s for the belt runs. Major element contents of experimental run products were acquired using a JEOL JXA 8200 Superprobe (Tokyo, Japan) electron-probe microanalyzer equipped with 5 wavelength dispersive spectrometers at the University of Mainz using the methods described in [
37].
For trace element analysis, the sediment was fused to a 2 mm glass bead on top of an Ir-piece by using a strip-heater device. Trace elements (
Tables S1 and S2) were collected by using laser ablation-inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (LA-ICP-MS) at the University of Mainz [
38]. An ESI NWR193 ArF Excimer laser (Bozeman, MT, USA) ablation system (193 nm wavelength) equipped with a TwoVol2 ablation cell was used for the formation of a dry aerosol from the samples. Ablation was performed with a repetition rate of 10 Hz at 3 J/cm
2. The sample was transferred to an Agilent 7500ce (Santa Clara, CA, USA) mass spectrometer by a He-Ar mixed gas flow. Synthetic glass NIST SRM 610 (Gaithersburg, MD, USA) was used as calibration material using published values [
39] and
29Si was selected as the internal standard for silicates, using the SiO
2 data determined by electron microprobe. For quality control, synthetic NIST SRM 612 and basaltic USGS BCR-2G were measured as unknowns in each run (
Table S1). Results for NIST SRM 612 and USGS BCR-2G were, on average, within 10% of the data tabulated in the GeoReM database
http://georem.mpch-mainz.gwdg.de/ (accessed on 1 January 2021), [
40]. For each analysis, background signals were acquired for 20 s, followed by a dwell time of 30 s with spot sizes of 20 µm. Data processing was carried out using GLITTER 4.4.1 [
41].
LA-ICP-TOFMS was used to map trace elements of the experiments by using an icpTOF R (TOFWERK AG, Thun, Switzerland) coupled to an Analyte G2 193 nm excimer laser ablation system equipped with a HelEx II dual-volume ablation cell and an Aerosol Rapid Introduction System (ARIS) for fast washout of the sample aerosol (Teledyne CETAC Technologies, Omaha, USA). The spot size was set to 5 µm with a repetition rate of 30 Hz and a laser fluence of 3 J/cm
2. Each pixel represents the signal from a single laser shot [
31,
42]. The count rates for each element measured by LA-ICP-TOFMS were used to compare element abundances in the reaction zone between the sediment and dunite. For each element, the count rates were averaged from an equal sized area (10,000 µm
2) within the reaction zone and the dunite (
Figure A5).
4. Discussion
Although the fore-arc mantle is widely interpreted from geophysical measurements to be hydrated [
9,
10,
11], it remains unclear to what degree its major and trace element composition is modified by infiltrating volatile-bearing partial melts derived from sediments. Subducted sediments have low solidus temperatures of about 675 °C, which strongly depend on composition, pressure, and volatile contents [
3,
4]. Since continental lithologies are usually enriched in potassium compared to peridotitic mantle rocks (K/Na 1–2), they can provide the enrichment in K for potassic-ultrapotassic magmatism [
14]. When felsic crustal material is buried to mantle depths, it will preferentially melt and react with the surrounding peridotitic matrix. Given the low solidus of hydrous melts of sediments at ~675 °C [
3,
4], we propose that these melts rise from the slab surface within the fore-arc of a subduction zone and metasomatize the lithospheric mantle between the sediment solidus (white arrow in
Figure 1) and the 1000 °C isotherm (blue line), the wet solidus of peridotite [
28]. This is based on the following observations: (1) the eruption of trace-element enriched ultrapotassic lavas that form during rare events of slab-rollback and fore-arc mantle melting [
13,
23]; (2) the strong HFSE-depletion of arc magmas [
7,
46], which can be explained either by the retention of HFSE in sediments during the formation of arc magmas or by the redistribution of HFSE to the fore-arc mantle before the sediment components proceed to the depths of arc magma sources; (3) a recent compilation [
47] of the global range of subduction zone thermal structures from exhumed blueschists and eclogites shows that pelitic sedimentary rocks reach their solidus at depths as low as 30 to 80 km, indicating that melting of subducted sedimentary rocks in fore-arc regions is probably widespread; (4) the presence of an extensive magnetotelluric low resistivity zone stretching from the mantle to shallow crustal depths (30–80 km) in front of the volcanic arc [
30,
48,
49] that coincides with hot springs on the surface that discharge Cl- and CO
2-bearing fluids [
50]. Additionally, these fluids are themselves indicative of devolatilization and reaction processes that take place already within the fore-arc mantle.
4.1. Progressive Replacement of Peridotites by Phlogopite Pyroxenites in the Fore-Arc Mantle
The reaction of hydrous and carbonate-rich partial melts derived from sediments with dunite leads to the formation of a metasomatic zone enriched in Na
2O, K
2O, Al
2O
3, CaO, TiO
2, and SiO
2, as well as in LILE, HFSE, and LREE that consumes olivine. This is illustrated by the preservation of orthopyroxene inclusions in clinopyroxene in layer 3 of the experiments (
Figure A3), which originate from the former dunite layer. The growth of phlogopite pyroxenites at 2–3 GPa/800–1000 °C is in accordance with previous studies [
14,
15,
16,
17].
The intense metasomatism of the dunite is evident when each metasomatic layer and the average metasome composition is plotted against the unaltered dunite (
Figure A4) in an isocon plot [
51,
52]. The metasomatized reaction zone is progressively enriched in Na
2O, K
2O, Al
2O
3, CaO, TiO
2, and SiO
2 from layer 1 to 3 (
Figure A4A) as well as in LILE, HFSE, and LREE (
Figure A4B) compared to the un-metasomatized dunite. A Gresens-Grant analysis [
51,
52] shows that this enrichment is balanced by the progressive decrease of MgO and FeO from layer 1 to layer 3 (
Table A4).
LA-ICP-TOFMS mapping shows that trace elements are heterogeneously redistributed throughout the reaction zone. LILE, HFSE, and light REE are enriched in the reaction zone (layers 1–3) and controlled by the growth of phlogopite, clinopyroxene, and accessory apatite as well as sulphides (
Figure 2). These newly grown phases form repositories for distinctive sets of trace elements. The reaction zone remains low in heavy REE because these are retained in garnet in the residue of the partially molten former sedimentary rock as expressed by the low enrichment factors for heavy REE (
Figure 4A,
Table A1). Since the element distribution between reaction zone and dunite is controlled by mineral growth, the enrichment factors (D) represent the metasomatic enrichment of depleted peridotite by hydrous and carbonate-rich partial melts derived from the sedimentary rock layer (
Figure 4A).
Assuming subducted sedimentary material is involved in creating the trace element patterns in ultrapotassic magmas, the mechanism of their formation must enrich LILE, HFSE, and LREE more than HREE to satisfy the observed trace element patterns [
19]. Using the fractional melting equation [
43] and a wide range of fractional melting of 1–50% of the sedimentary rock, LILE, HFSE, and light REE patterns of the metasome-forming melts in the experiments are identical to those of ultrapotassic magmas in post-collisional settings [
19] (
Figure 4B). Following the cessation of subduction, heating of the metasomes to >1150–1200 °C [
53] by e.g., slab-rollback [
13,
23] could trigger melting and formation of ultrapotassic magmas. During fore-arc metasomatism, the eclogite-like residue from the former sediment is depleted in decreasing order from LILE to heavy REE compared to the sedimentary starting material, as seen by the decrease of D
(reaction zone/dunite). This process may explain the presence of LILE-, HFSE-, and LREE-depleted eclogites [
27], which have previously been explained as residues of fluid-metasomatism beneath the volcanic arc. The further descent of the eclogite-like residue and its incorporation into the arc magma source at deeper levels of >3 GPa successfully explains the characteristic depleted HFSE and REE <1 (Sm-Lu) [
45] signature ascribed to subducted sediments in arc magmas (
Figure 4B).
4.2. Location and Geometry of Fore-Arc Metasomes
The range of calculated e.g., [
29] and observed [
47] subduction-zone temperatures show that hydrous clastic sediments will have already crossed the solidus in the fore-arc. In calculated models [
29], thermal gradients of subduction zones stay close to the ‘forbidden zone’ of metamorphism on Earth until ~2.5 GPa and then rapidly heat up in the vicinity of the convecting mantle. In these cases, the solidus of hydrous sedimentary rocks (~675 °C) is reached in a narrow depth zone just in front of the arc. Temperatures from exhumed blueschists and eclogites [
47] are 200–400 °C above these calculated models at corresponding depths, suggesting that subducted sedimentary rocks may melt at a greater distance from the arc than has commonly been assumed. However, it has also been argued that temperatures derived from exhumed rocks are biased to higher temperatures as rocks are preferentially exhumed under warm conditions [
54]. Nevertheless, as subducting sediment heats up from ambient temperature at the surface to that of the convecting mantle beneath the arc, any subduction zone will have a region where volatile-bearing melt from sediments infiltrates and reacts with mantle to produce metasomes, but where temperatures are still too low to generate arc magma. Hence, the thermal gradient in a subduction zone dictates the extent and location of fore-arc metasomatism, which consequently means that young and hot subduction zones offer more favorable conditions for producing metasomes over a wide area within the fore-arc. If the globally present magnetotelluric anomalies [
30,
48,
49,
50] of fore-arcs represent these metasomes as demonstrated by synthetic magnetotelluric modelling [
18], they are up to ~30–50 km wide and 40 km high and reach along the strike of the subduction zone.
4.3. Rates of Metasomatism
The reaction zone forms by the infiltration of siliceous sediment melt that is completely consumed as it reacts with the dunite. The reaction zone thickness was found to increase with temperature and experiment duration. Calculated growth rates exhibit an exponential dependency on temperature (R
2 = 0.91) (
Figure 5). Infiltration of ultramafic potassic melt [
37,
53] exhibits a similar exponential dependency on temperature (R
2 = 0.66) and is in accordance with experiments that examined percolation of basaltic melts within peridotite [
55,
56]. Both styles of metasomatism, i.e., by volatile-bearing silicic partial melts derived from sediments and by ultramafic potassic melts, follow a similar trend with temperature (R
2 = 0.91). An extrapolation of reaction zone growth rates translates to hypothetical rates of metasomatism that cover a range of 3–500 m/ky for temperatures of 750–1450 °C (
Figure 5). For a cool fore-arc environment, metasome growth rates are <5 m/ky for temperatures <900 °C to <1 m/ky for temperatures <700 °C. These growth rates are about an order of magnitude below the rate of subduction which varies between 10–100 m/ky [
57]. Since the sediment melts to a fraction of ~10%, the rate of replenishment of the sediment by continued subduction approximately matches the growth of the reaction zone. If no subduction erosion of this metasome happens, it may reach a thickness of ~1 km in ~1 million years. However, this metasome growth should be taken only as a speculative estimate since the migration rate of the reaction zone in the experiments is driven by grain sizes as well as the combination of chemical and thermal gradients. Thus, it is unclear how the processes within the capsule scale to a natural environment, which is likely more dynamic than an experiment under constant hydrostatic pressure. Therefore, if melt extraction and supply to the fore-arc mantle is channelized, percolation rates [
58] could increase significantly and will probably be similar to the extraction rates of silica-rich melt within migmatites [
59], which reaches rates of up to ~20 m/ky. Hence, the percolation rate estimated for silica-rich melt in channelized melt flow could be taken as a maximum for melt infiltration within the fore-arc mantle, while the estimated metasome growth rates of 1–5 m/ky from the experiments could be regarded as a minimum.
5. Conclusions
Our results provide direct experimental evidence of metasome growth within the fore-arc mantle (
Figure 1) and reveal the following key insights into subduction-related mantle metasomatism:
(1) The low solidus of volatile-bearing clastic sediments (~675 °C, [
3,
4]), compared to that of depleted peridotites and volatile-bearing partial melts derived from them, will lead to infiltration in the fore-arc mantle wedge long before the volatile-bearing solidus of peridotite [
28,
60] is reached in the source regions of arc magmas. The large difference in solidus temperatures leads to reaction and crystallization as well as to trapping of infiltrating melt, while low amounts of partial melt may be retained in the eclogite-like residue.
(2) All experiments resulted in a layered reaction zone where the redistribution of major and trace elements was controlled by mineral growth, which effectively separates distinct sets of elements because of the minerals formed. Trace element enrichment was highest for LILE, followed by HFSE and light REE, while the reaction zone was low inHREE.
(3) Whereas the dunite was heavily metasomatized by infiltration of, and reaction with, hydrous and carbonate-rich partial melts, the residual sediment was transformed to an eclogite-like mineralogy, comprising mainly garnet and clinopyroxene.
(4) Calculation of the metasome composition shows that a wide range (1–50%) of fractional melting of the sediment successfully explains the geochemical signature of sediments in the source of post-collisional K-enriched magmas, while the depleted residue from this reaction corresponds to the geochemical characteristics of the sediment component in arc magmas. The general depletion in HFSE in arc magmas results from the loss of these elements to the fore-arc metasome since they are also enriched in the reaction zone (
Figure 5). Thus, the sediment component in arc magmas is delivered by the residue after partial melting of subducted sedimentary rocks has already occurred in the fore-arc, rather than being due to unmodified subducted sediment.
(5) For a temperature range of 700–900 °C, the rates at which fore-arc metasomes form and spread are in the order of 1–5 m/ky, which is 1–2 orders of magnitude lower than rates of subduction. After <1 million years of subduction, the metasome may grow to an aggregated thickness of >1 km.
(6) Slab rollback is able to introduce heat into the metasomatized zone of the fore-arc and triggers melting of the phlogopite pyroxenites, resulting in trace element-rich high-K lavas, as observed in Mexico [
23] and Turkey [
13].