Next Article in Journal
The Effect of Group Composition and Mineral Supplementation during Rearing on Measures of Cartilage Condition and Bone Mineral Density in Replacement Gilts
Previous Article in Journal
At the Intersection of Industry, Academia, and Government: How Do We Facilitate Productive Precision Livestock Farming in Practice?
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Animals
Volume 9
Issue 9
10.3390/ani9090636
animals-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Genome-Wide Association Study in Mexican Holstein Cattle Reveals Novel Quantitative Trait Loci Regions and Confirms Mapped Loci for Resistance to Bovine Tuberculosis

by
Sara González-Ruiz
1,
Maria G. Strillacci
2,*,
Marina Durán-Aguilar
3,
Germinal J. Cantó-Alarcón
3,
Sara E. Herrera-Rodríguez
4,
Alessandro Bagnato
2,
Luis F. Guzmán
5,
Feliciano Milián-Suazo
3 and
Sergio I. Román-Ponce
6,*
1
Doctorado en Ciencias Biológicas, Universidad Autónoma de Querétaro, Avenida de las Ciencias S/N Juriquilla, Delegación Santa Rosa Jáuregui, Querétaro C.P. 76230, Mexico
2
Department of Veterinary Medicine, Università degli Studi di Milano, Via Trentacoste, 2, 20134 Milano, Italy
3
Facultad de Ciencias Naturales, Universidad Autónoma de Querétaro, Avenida de las Ciencias S/N Juriquilla, Delegación Santa Rosa Jáuregui, Querétaro C.P. 76230, Mexico
4
Centro de Investigación y Asistencia en Tecnología y Diseño del Estado de Jalisco A.C., Guadalajara C.P. 44270, Mexico
5
Centro Nacional de Recursos Genéticos, INIFAP, Tepatitlán de Morelos 47600, Mexico
6
Centro Nacional de Investigación Disciplinaria en Fisiología y Mejoramiento animal, INIFAP, SAGARPA, Km. 1 Carretera a Colón, Ajuchitlán, Colón, Querétaro C.P. 76280, Mexico
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Animals 2019, 9(9), 636; https://doi.org/10.3390/ani9090636
Submission received: 20 May 2019 / Revised: 23 August 2019 / Accepted: 24 August 2019 / Published: 30 August 2019
(This article belongs to the Section Animal Physiology)
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:

Simple Summary

Bovine tuberculosis is an infectious disease of cattle caused by Mycobacterium bovis characterized by the formation of tubercles in any organ or tissue. Bovine tuberculosis represents a significant veterinary and public health problem in many parts of the world. It is zoonotic, transmitted to humans through consumption of infected milk and other cattle products. Although many factors influence infection and progression of the disease, there must be an important host genetic component that explains why some animals get sick and others remain healty. We present evidence of genetic variants associated with resistance to tuberculosis in Mexican Holstein dairy cattle using a case-control approach with a selective DNA pooling. Here, we identified novel quantitative trait loci regions harboring genes involved in Mycobacterium spp. immune response. This is a first screening about resistance to tuberculosis infection on Mexican Holstein cattle based on a dense single nucleotide polymorphism chip. The identified genes belong to both, the already known, and the undisclosed quantitative trait loci regions.

Abstract

Bovine tuberculosis (bTB) is a disease of cattle that represents a risk to public health and causes severe economic losses to the livestock industry. Recently, genetic studies, like genome-wide association studies (GWAS) have greatly improved the investigation of complex diseases identifying thousands of disease-associated genomic variants. Here, we present evidence of genetic variants associated with resistance to TB in Mexican dairy cattle using a case-control approach with a selective DNA pooling experimental design. A total of 154 QTLRs (quantitative trait loci regions) at 10% PFP (proportion of false positives), 42 at 5% PFP and 5 at 1% PFP have been identified, which harbored 172 annotated genes. On BTA13, five new QTLRs were identified in the MACROD2 and KIF16B genes, supporting their involvement in resistance to bTB. Six QTLRs harbor seven annotated genes that have been previously reported as involved in immune response against Mycobacterium spp: BTA (Bos taurus autosome) 1 (CD80), BTA3 (CTSS), BTA 3 (FCGR1A), BTA 23 (HFE), BTA 25 (IL21R), and BTA 29 (ANO9 and SIGIRR). We identified novel QTLRs harboring genes involved in Mycobacterium spp. immune response. This is a first screening for resistance to TB infection on Mexican dairy cattle based on a dense SNP (Single Nucleotide Polymorphism) chip.

1. Introduction

Bovine tuberculosis (bTB), caused by Mycobacterium bovis is a chronic infectious disease characterized by granulomas in affected tissues [1,2]. M. bovis infects a wide range of mammalian hosts, domestic and wildlife species, and humans; therefore, it is a risk to public health [3]. It has been estimated that nearly 10 million people are affected by tuberculosis worldwide every year, and that the proportion of cases due to M. bovis in humans during the last two decades was from 0.5% to 13%, depending on the study population [4,5,6]. Additionally, bTB causes economic losses to the livestock industry: infected animals have poor production performance, die or are disposed of prematurely [7,8]. Cattle TB is considered the fourth most significant livestock disease in terms of impact on human health in developing countries, including risks to species other than cattle and the wildlife species [9]. The disease persists in livestock in spite of the on-going eradication program that has been established. The program relies on a test-and-slaughter strategy in herds of cattle, and carcass inspection at abattoirs [10].
Recently, genetic studies like genome-wide association studies (GWASs) have greatly improved the understanding of complex diseases identifying thousands of disease-associated genomic variants [11]. Evidence suggests that genetic variation and resistance to bTB exists in many species, including humans, mice, deer and cattle [12,13]. Heritability values estimated on UK and Irish cattle populations have shown that individual variability for host resistance to TB has a genetic basis [14,15]. Other studies have also shown genetic variation for resistance of cattle to TB [15]; higher resistance has been reported in Bos taurus indicus compared to Bos taurus [16,17].
In Mexico, bTB is still an endemic disease, and the availability of genomic tools, such as high-density SNP (Single Nucleotide Polymorphism), allow disclosing QTL (quantitative trait loci) regions harboring genes involved in the immune response against TB, as previously reported in different cattle populations. Several studies have in fact identified genetic loci associated with bTB resistance. They included polymorphisms in candidate genes like SLC11A1 in African Zebu cattle [18], TLR1 in Chinese Holsteins [19], SNP on BTA23 in Irish dairy herds [20], and three other genetic loci on BTA2 and 13 were also associated [21]. A GWAS involving Irish Holsteins identified a genomic region in BTA22 containing the taurine transporter gene SLC6A6, which was suggestively associated with resistance [22]. In a case-control study, GWAS used in Mycobacterium avium subsp. paratuberculosis (MAP) identified chromosomal regions (BTA9, BTA11 and BTA12) associated with this disease; and provides evidence of genetic loci involvement in humoral response to MAP [23].
Therefore, the aim of this study was to identify QTL regions involved in resistance to TB in Mexican dairy cattle using a GWAS case-control approach with a selective DNA pooling experimental design.

2. Materials and Methods

This project was approved by the Bioethics Committee of the Natural Sciences Department of the Autonomous University of Queretaro under registry number 29FCN2016.

2.1. Tissue Samples

Tissue samples were collected from carcasses at slaughterhouses in the States of Jalisco and Aguascalientes. These two states are located in central Mexico where the within-herd prevalence of tuberculosis in dairy cattle is about 16% [24,25]. Animals slaughtered were Holstein cows from small family-run herds with an average size of 70 head.
Even when all lymph nodes and internal organs were checked for the presence of lesions, tissue samples selected were taken only from lymph nodes in head (retropharyngeal), thorax (tracheobronchial and mediastinal), abdomen (mesenteric), and lungs. Tissue samples were collected both from animals with visible lesions and from animals with no visible lesions at carcass inspection. After collection, tissue samples were immediately placed in a cooler with ice and taken to the laboratory where they were kept at −20 °C until analysis. Hair samples were taken from the ear in the same animals as a source of DNA for SNP genotyping. Epidemiological data for each animal included herd and States of sampling, sex, age, and the organ affected, and was used to evaluate homogeneity of prevalence of bTB across different geographical areas of sample collection.

2.2. Bacteriological Analysis

All tissue samples were cultured in Stonebrink and Lowenstein-Jensen media with pyruvate for the isolation of M. bovis (Figure 1). Briefly, tissue samples were first surface-sterilized with 1:1000 solution of sodium hypochlorite, and then macerated and decontaminated with a 10% solution of hydrochloric acid as previously reported [25,26].

2.3. Experimental Design, DNA Extraction, Pooling and Genotyping

A total of 375 biological samples were included in the study, 150 cases (tissue samples with visible lesions and culture positive) and 225 controls (tissue samples with no visible lesions and culture negative), collected from carcasses. All samples were from the same geographic area and, in some cases, from the same herd, to ensure similar level of exposure to the pathogen as previously described [24,25].
A selective DNA pooling design [27] was used in this study to identify QTL regions associated with resistance to bTB in a case control study. This experimental design has been shown to be effective, appropriate, powerful to perform association studies, and highly accurate compared with experimental designs using individual-sample genotyping [28,29]. Selective DNA pooling has been extensively used in GWAS mapping studies in livestock for mapping QTL in quantitative traits [29,30], and in case control studies in cattle [31,32].
With the advent of dense SNP chip arrays, the source of variation related to the experimental design and the methodology to control and accurately account for it has been discussed and established [33,34].
DNA extraction was performed using a commercial kit (Wizard® Genomic DNA Purification Kit, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) following the manufacturer recommendations. Quantity and quality control on each DNA sample was performed by spectrophotometry with NanoDrop™ 2000 equipment (Thermo Fisher Scientific). Integrity of the DNA was determined by electrophoresis on a 1% agarose gel pre-stained with GelRed® Nucleic Acid Gel Stain (Biotium, Fremont, CA, USA).
All DNA samples were normalized at a concentration of 50 ng/µL. DNA pools were then built by taking equivalent amounts of volume from each DNA sample, thus the final concentration for each pool was 50 ng/µL according to Illumina array requirements.
A total of 75 DNA samples were used in building each pool, and biological, technical and array replicates were designed as suggested [33,34]. Pools for cases were composed of two independent groups of 75 animals (average age of 47 ± 1.8 months and the proportion was 75% females and 25% males) positive for visible lesions at carcass inspection and positive for M. bovis isolation by culture (Figure 1). These two pools represent two independent biological replicates. The pools for controls were composed of three independent groups of 75 animals (average age of 43 ± 2.8 months and the proportion was 62% females and 38% males) with no visible lesions and negative for M. bovis isolation by culture. Each of the pools was produced in two replicates to account for possible errors in pooling the individuals (technical pooling replicates, i.e., Pool_Rep “_A” and “_B” in Table 1) and respectively genotyped three times to account for array technical error (technical array replicates, i.e., Array_Rep “_1”, “_2”, and “_3” in Table 1).
The 10 pools (biological and technical replicates) were processed in three array replicates each, on the Illumina BovineHD BeadChips (777,962 SNP), following the Infinium protocol obtaining a total of 30 sets of B-allele frequency for each SNP. SNPs position was determined according to the UMD 3.1 bovine assembly.

2.4. Statistical Analysis of Pool

The B-allele frequencies (BAF) values for each SNP were obtained from the self-normalization algorithm of Illumina BeadStudio software® for each of the three arrays technical replicates of the 10 pools. The BAF is a very accurate measure of the frequency of the alleles in all individuals together in a pool as previously reported [29].
First, a quality control was performed at array technical replicate comparing the standard deviation (SD) distribution of B-allele frequencies among each triplet of array technical replicates. Two array-replicates, one case and one control, were eliminated from the analysis because the value of their B-allele frequency diverged from the other two technical array-replicates. Second, a quality control on the BAF estimation was performed at SNP level as follows: the SD among BAF from the replicate assays (biological, pool and array technical replicates) within cases and controls was calculated, and the markers showing the largest 10% SD were excluded from the analysis. Finally, only SNPs with minor allele frequency (MAF) ≥0.05 were retained. After editing, a total of 438,555 SNPs (of which 10,034 were on BTX (Bos taurus X autosome) were used in the association analysis.
GWAS was performed comparing at each marker the allele frequencies obtained for the cases pools with those obtained in the control pools for each marker (averaged over replicates within case and within control) according to the selective DNA pooling (SDP) design and methods as described in detail [31,32]. GWAS was performed after excluding monomorphic SNPs, SNPs mapped on BTY, mitochondrial SNPs, and SNPs without chromosome position.
A single-marker test for marker-trait association was used, and the p-value for each marker calculated as:
Ztest = Dtest/SD (Dnull)
where: Dtest is the difference of the B-allele frequencies means among tails, and Dnull is the difference of the B-allele frequencies means within tails.

2.5. Quantitative Trait Loci Region Definition

The nominal P values at different PFP (proportion of false positives) thresholds, i.e., 1%, 5% and 10%, have been identified according to Fernando et al. [34,35], and the corresponding −log10 (p-value) calculated, resulting: (i) for PFP at 1%, 4.58; (ii) for PFP at 5%, 3.17; (iii) for PFP at 10%, 2.53. As in Lipkin et al. [31], moving averages of −log10 (p-values) were calculated considering a window of 16 SNP markers, corresponding to an average-window-size of about 100 Kb. As shown in Lipkin et al. [31], PFP is the appropriate approach to correct for multiple testing when the moving averages approach proposed by the same authors is used to identify QTL regions. As such the window average values above the PFP thresholds of 1%, 5% and 10% have been considered as leading QTL average. A 1 log drop in flanking average values defined the boundaries of the QTL region (QTLR). The leading SNP is the one showing the largest −log10 (p-value) among those in each QTLR.

2.6. Functional Annotation of the QTLR

The SNPchiMp online database [36] was utilized to match the Illumina SNP name with the SNP rsID (Reference SNP cluster ID). The European Variation Archive (EVA) variant browser of EMBL-EBI [37] allowed annotating all the leading SNPs through the rsID. The full genes set (Bos taurus: Ensemble Gene 92) was used [38]. Gene ontology (GO) functional annotation and KEGG pathway analyses using the Gene ontology (GO) and pathway analyses were performed using the DAVID Bioinformatics Resources software, version 6.8 [39]. In addition, bovine QTL available from Animal Genome Database [40] were catalogued into our QTLRs by overlapping.
STRING (Search Tool for the Retrieval of Interacting Genes/Proteins) was used to investigate the existence of gene networks in cattle among ones in QTLRs identified with PFP at 10%. Those found in the gene network were annotated by STRING using both bovine and human databases.

3. Results

From the 375 animals included in the study, 34% were males, and 65% females, ages 12 to 108 months; 44 months was the most frequent age (22%). From the cases group, lesions were found mainly in lymph nodes of head (retropharyngeal 51%) and thorax (mediastinal and tracheobronchial, 61%), some animals had lesions in more than one lymph node.

QTLRs Associated with Resistance/Susceptibility to bTB

A total 154 QTLRs at 10% PFP were identified (Figure 2, Table S1). In general, all these regions were distributed homogeneously over all autosomes (with the exception that none were found on BTA15 and BTA17), and on chromosome X (n. 2), defined by 3296 SNPs. The average length of the QTLRs was 93,446 bp. Table S1 also includes information about the position of the leading SNP for each QTLR on the chromosome, the number of SNPs defining the regions, and its location in the genes annotated within the QTLR, and the number of SNPs pertaining to the regions above each of the three PFP thresholds.
One hundred and seventy-two genes (including 2 miRNA and 5 tRNA) were catalogued in the QTLRs using the Bos taurus Ensembl Gene annotation release 92 (Table S2). The DAVID (The Database for Annotation, Visualization and Integrated Discovery) Database recognized all these genes (excluding miRNA and tRNA), but not for all of them provided the annotated information according to the GO (Gene Ontology) and the KEGG (Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes) pathways terms as in Table 2 (reporting only gene function classifications resulted with a nominal p value ≤ 0.05). As shown in Table 2, most genes refer to the immune response and structural terms. Table S2 reports: (i) the list of genes annotated in the QTLRs (list of genes); (ii) the gene annotation according to the DAVID database classification reported as clustered and not clustered genes including those with a nominal p value ≥ 0.05.
In Figure 3, the gene network obtained for genes annotated with STRING is shown for Bos taurus and Homo sapiens proteins. The genes shown are only the ones in QTLRs that were part of a network. Table S3 reports the GO and pathway analysis for the genes included in the networks of Figure 3.

4. Discussion

Bovine TB is one of the most prevalent and important diseases in the livestock industry, as well as in wildlife and human population [3]; its eradication is still a priority for many countries. Current strategies to reduce the prevalence in the herds of livestock focus primarily on test-and-disposal of reactors, and abattoir surveillance. In developing countries, however, the success of these programs has been partial because of the poor sensitivity of the tuberculin test and the difficulties tracing back infected animals identified at slaughterhouses. New strategies have been recommended, such as vaccination, in either cattle or the wildlife species [41], estimation of direct genomic estimated breeding values (EBVs) in UK dairy cattle [42], or to increase host resistance through breeding practices [43]. Recent studies in fact have disclosed genetic variability affecting resistance to bTB [20,41,43,44,45,46,47,48] suggesting the possibility of implementing genomic selection for that feature in cattle.
The genes present in the novel QTLRs according to the PFP, 1%, 5% and 10% p values threshold were:

4.1. QTLR_1%_PFP

Five QTLRs distributed on different BTA (7, 10, 13, 30 and 31) were identified, but the three genes mapping within these regions are not involved in metabolic pathways associated with bTB.

4.2. QTLR_5%_PFP

4.2.1. BTA 1

The QTLR_10 and QTLR_16 include genes involved in immune response to disease. In detail, the first region harbors the TIGIT gene (T cell immunoreceptor with Ig and ITIM (Immunoreceptor tyrosine-based inhibitory motif) domain), an inhibitor of the T cell proliferation, the cytokine production in CD4+ T cells, and of the NK cells cytolytic activity [49]. As reported by Joller et al. [50], the altered balance between activation and inhibitory immune signals can result in increased susceptibility to infection or to induction of autoimmunity.
The NAALADL2 gene (N-acetylated alpha-linked acidic dipeptidase-like 2), whose function is not well known, is located within the QTLR_16. This gene promotes a pro-migratory and pro-metastatic phenotype in cancer [51], and was recently associated with bovine respiratory disease susceptibility [31].

4.2.2. BTA 3

The TRIM33 gene (Tripartite motif containing 33), located in QTLR_27 on BTA 3, is involved in migration of macrophages and neutrophils towards inflammatory stimulus in vertebrate tissues [52]. Weng et al. [53] reported TRIM33 roles in transcriptional regulation during hematopoiesis, tumor suppressor activity in multiple tissues, erythropoiesis, and DNA repair.

4.2.3. BTA 5

On this chromosome, the QTLR_37 harbors the CD163 gene (CD163 molecule). This gene, expressed on monocytes, macrophages and subpopulations of hematopoietic progenitor is involved in the clearance of haptoglobin–hemoglobin complexes by mediating endocytosis, and prevents the toxic and oxidative effects of free hemoglobin. Different mediators regulate the CD163 gene expression: up-regulation by glucocorticoids and IL10, and down-regulation by lipopolysaccharide, gamma-interferon, and tumor necrosis factor alpha [54].

4.2.4. BTA 13

Interestingly, from 8.1 Mb to 10.2 Mb, five QTLRs (QTLR_95, QTLR_96, QTLR_97, QTLR_98 and QTLR_99) are found: the first four located within the gene MACROD2 (MACRO domain containing 2), and the fifth one is in between the end of the gene MACROD2 and a second gene KIF16B (Kinesin Family Member 16 B) (Figure 4). The individual −log10 p values show very clear peaks supporting the indication that in this 2 Mb region the MACROD2 gene and the KIF16B gene may play a role in resistance to TB. According to Figure 4 showing the introns and exons of MACROD2 gene (NCBI refseq gene 105) and the GWAS results for this chromosomal region, the QTLR_98 includes three exons (blue vertical lines). Nevertheless, the MACROD2 gene is very long and its annotation still needs additional validation [55].
The KIF16B gene encodes a kinesin-like protein that could be involved in intracellular trafficking [56].

4.3. QTLR_10%_PFP

BTA 2

The DNER gene (delta/notch-like EGF repeat containing) within the QTLR_21 on BTA 2, is among those differentially expressed for inflammatory diseases, connective tissue disorders and immunological diseases in cattle [57]. In addition, the DNER gene expression level has been shown to decrease in highly marbled beef cattle [58].
Six QTLRs harbor seven genes that have been already associated with susceptibility/resistance to TB: QTLR_12 on BTA 1 (CD80), QTLR_25 on BTA3 (CTSS), QTLR_26 on BTA 3 (FCGR1A), QTLR_127 on BTA 23 (HFE), QTLR_133 on BTA 25 (IL21R), and QTLR_152 on BTA 29 (ANO9 and SIGIRR). These genes are all involved in immune response against Mycobacterium spp.
  • Cathepsins, including Cathepsin S (CTSS) are proteolytic enzymes that function mainly in lysosomes, where they contribute to pathogen killing by their involvement in antigen presentation pathways. Pires et al. [59] demonstrated the role of this class of proteins in the control of M. tuberculosis by manipulating the cathepsin expression by pathogenic mycobacteria to favor its intracellular survival.
  • The protein encoded by the CD80 gene (CD80 molecule), the B-lymphocyte activation antigen B7-1 is a membrane receptor that affects the immunological reactivity of T-lymphocytes when its expression decreases. In addition, CD80 has a role in enhancing the anti-tuberculosis immunity [60].
  • The FCGR1A gene (Fc fragment of IgG receptor Ia) expression, together with that of the BLR1 gene has been considered as potential marker for monitoring the extent of TB disease and to predict treatment outcome in children affected by M. tuberculosis [61].
  • Booty et al. [62] reported that the cytokine IL-21, produced predominantly by activated CD4+ T cells and CD8+ T cells, is an essential signaling marker for host resistance to M. tuberculosis infection via the IL-21 receptor (IL-21R).
  • Gomes-Pereira et al. [63] reported an increased susceptibility to M. avium in Hemochromatosis Protein HFE-Deficient Mice. HEF (homeostatic iron regulator) is a fundamental protein involved in the regulation of cellular iron uptake and iron homeostasis. Studies indicate that monocytes with mutated HFE have decreased intracellular iron levels [64]. Also, Wang at el. [65] demonstrated that hemochromatosis impacts the regulation of macrophage cytokine translation and, consequently the inflammatory response.
  • The ANO9 gene, also known as TMEM16J (anoctamin 9), together with the SIGIRR and the PKP3 genes constitute a polymorphic complex associated with susceptibility to tuberculosis [66]. The SIGIRR gene, also known as Toll IL-1 receptor 8, is a regulatory protein acting to inhibit ILRs and TLRs signaling [67]. The PKP3, the third part of this complex gene, maps 6.2 Kb from the end of the QTLR_152.
In addition, three QTLRs identified in our study (QTLR_43 on BTA6, QTLR_115, and QTLR_118 on BTA 21) overlap with those found by Richardson et al. [20] in a study on bovine tuberculosis susceptibility performed in a population of Holstein–Friesian bulls (ID: 96694; 96508, 96511, 96525, 96514, 96517, 96411, 96549, and 96497). Also, the QTLR_84 on BTA12 and QTLR_139 on BTA26 are included within the “Bovine respiratory disease susceptibility QTL (ID: 95663)” and the “Heat tolerance QTL (ID: 31198)”, respectively.

5. Conclusions

The results presented here reveal novel QTLRs and confirm mapped loci for resistance to tuberculosis in dairy cattle. The novel QTLRs located on BTA 1, 3, 5, 25 and 29 harbor genes related to immune response. Our results confirm QTL regions previously mapped on BTA 2, 6, 13, 21, 22 and 23 related to resistance to bTB in other dairy cattle populations.
Genomic regions and genes identified in the present study with a case-control selective DNA pooling approach were significantly associated with resistance to TB in cattle. The findings of this study could be used to improve the knowledge on the bTB immune response against Mycobacterium bovis, and thus provide the basis for genetic control of this disease in cattle.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at https://www.mdpi.com/2076-2615/9/9/636/s1, Table S1: QTLRs identified on BTAs and on BTX, and the complete list of all genes mapped within QTLRs. Highlighted regions in bolt are those found above 5% PFP and 1% PFP thresholds. Table S2: Reports the list of genes annotated in the QTLRs. Table S3: Reports the GO and pathway analysis for the gene included in the networks of Figure 3.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, F.M.-S. and S.I.R.-P.; Data curation, M.D.-A., G.J.C.-A., S.E.H.-R. and L.F.G.; Formal analysis, S.G.-R., M.G.S. and A.B.; Funding acquisition, F.M.-S. and S.I.R.-P.; Investigation, M.G.S.; Methodology, G.J.C.-A. and L.F.G., M.D.-A. and G.J.C.-A.; Supervision, M.G.S., M.D.-A., S.E.H.-R., F.M.-S. and S.I.R.-P.; Writing—original draft, S.G.-R., M.G.S.; Writing—review & editing, A.B., F.M.-S., S.I.R.-P.

Funding

This research was funded by the National Institute for Forestry, Agriculture and Livestock Research, and the Special Funds for Research (FOPER) from the Autonomous University of Queretaro.

Acknowledgments

We knowledge the support from the slaughterhouses of the State of Jalisco for allowing sampling collection, Dulce Anahy Verdugo Escárcega and Susana Sosa Gallegos for their support in sample collection and laboratory analysis, and Erica Gorla for her support in data processing.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript, or in the decision to publish the results.

References

  1. Phillips, C.J.C.; Foster, C.R.W.; Morris, P.A.; Teverson, R. The transmission of Mycobacterium bovis infection to cattle. Res. Vet. Sci. 2003, 74, 1–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Abalos, P.; Retamal, P. Tuberculosis: Una zoonosis re-Emergente? Rev. Sci. 2004, 23, 583–594. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Blischak, J.D.; Tailleux, L.; Mitrano, A.; Barreiro, L.B.; Gilad, Y. Mycobacterial infection induces a specific human innate immune response. Sci. Rep. 2015, 5, 16882. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  4. Mûller, B.; Hity, M.; Berg, S.; García-Pelayo, M.C.; Dale, J.; Boschiroli, M.L.; Cadmus, S.; Ngandolo, B.N.; Godreuil, S.; Diguimbaye-Djaibé, C.; et al. African 1, an epidemiologically important clonal complex of Mycobacterium bovis dominant in Mali, Nigeria, Cameroon and Chad. J. Bacteriol. 2009, 191, 1951–1960. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Olea-Popelka, F.; Muwonge, A.; Perera, A.; Dean, A.S.; Mumford, E.; Erlacher-Vindel, E.; Forcella, S.; Silk, B.J.; Ditiu, L.; El Idrissi, A. Zoonotic tuberculosis in human beings caused by Mycobacterium bovis a call for action. Lancet Infect. Dis. 2017, 17, 21–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Perea-Razo, C.A.; Milián-Suazo, F.; Bárcenas-Reyes, I.; Sosa-Gallegos, S.; Rodríguez-Hernández, E.; Flores-Villalba, S.; Canto-Alarcón, G.J. Whole genome sequencing for detection of zoonotic tuberculosis in Querétaro, Mexico. J. Infect. Dis. Prev. Med. 2017, 5, 2. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Milián-Suazo, F.; Pérez-Guerrero, L.; Arriaga-Díaz, C.; Romero-Torres, C.; Escartín-Chávez, M. Epidemiología molecular de las tuberculosis bovina y humana en una zona endémica de Querétaro, México. Salub Publ. Mex. 2008, 50, 1–6. [Google Scholar]
  8. Elias, K.; Hussein, D.; Asseged, B.; Wondwossen, T.; Gebeyehu, M. Status of bovine tuberculosis in Addis Ababa dairy farms. Rev. Sci. Tech. 2008, 27, 915–923. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Perry, B.D.; Randolph, T.F.; McDermott, J.J.; Sones, K.R.; Thornton, P.K. Investing in Animal Health Research to Alleviate Poverty; ILRI (International Livestock Research Institute): Nairobi, Kenya, 2002. [Google Scholar]
  10. De la Rua-Domenech, R.; Goodchild, A.T.; Vordermeier, M.; Hewinson, R.G.; Christiansen, K.H.; Clifton-Hadley, R.S. Ante mortem diagnosis of tuberculosis in cattle: A review of the tuberculin tests. C-interferon assay and other ancillary diagnostic techniques. Res. Vet. Sci. 2006, 81, 190–210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Uren, C.; Henn, B.M.; Franke, A.; Wittig, M.; van Helden, P.D.; Hoal, E.G.; Möller, M. A post-GWAS analysis of predicted regulatory s and tuberculosis susceptibility. PLoS ONE 2017, 12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Allen, A.R.; Minozzi, G.; Glass, E.J.; Skuce, R.A.; McDowell, S.W.J.; Woolliams, J.A.; Bischop, S.C. Bovine tuberculosis: The genetic basis of host susceptibility. Proc. Biol. Sci. 2010, 277, 2737–2745. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Hernández-Marín, J.A.; Cortez-Romero, C.; Clemente-Sánchez, F.; Gallegos-Sánchez, J.; Salazar-Ortiz, J.; Tarango-Arámbula, L.A. Risk of transmission of Mycobacterium avium subspecies paratuberculosis (Map) in domestic and wild species. AGRO Prod. 2014, 7, 65–70. [Google Scholar]
  14. Bermingham, M.L.; More, S.J.; Good, M.; Cromie, A.R.; Higgins, I.M.; Berry, D.P. Genetic correlations between measures of Mycobacterium bovis infection and economically important traits in Irish Holstein–Friesian dairy cows. J. Dairy Sci. 2010, 93, 5413–5422. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Brotherstone, S.; White, I.M.S.; Coffey, M.; Downs, S.H.; Mitchell, A.P.; Clfton-Hadley, R.S.; More, S.J.; Good, M.; Woolliams, J.A. Evidence of genetic resistance of cattle to infection with Mycobacterium bovis. J. Dairy Sci. 2010, 93, 1234–1242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Carmichael, J. Bovine tuberculosis in the tropics with special reference to Uganda. Part 1. Vet. J. 1941, 97, 329–339. [Google Scholar]
  17. Ameni, G.; Aseffa, A.; Engers, H.; Young, D.; Gordon, S.; Hewinson, G.; Vordermeier, M. High prevalence and increased severity of pathology of bovine tuberculosis in Holsteins compared to Zebu breeds under field cattle husbandry in central Ethiopia. Clin. Vaccine Immunol. 2007, 14, 1356–1361. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Kadarmideen, H.N.; Ali, A.A.; Thomson, P.C.; Mûller, B.; Zinsstag, J. Polymorphisms of the SLC11A1 gene and resistance to bovine tuberculosis in African Zebu cattle. Anim. Genet. 2011, 42, 656–658. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Sun, L.; Song, Y.; Ria, H.; Yang, H.; Hua, G.; Guo, A.; Yang, L. Polymorphisms in Toll-Like receptor 1 and 9 genes and their association with tuberculosis susceptibility in Chinese Holstein cattle. Vet. Immunol. Immunopathol. 2012, 147, 195–201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Richardson, I.A.; Berry, D.P.; Wiencko, H.L.; Higgins, I.M.; More, S.J.; McClure, J.; Lynn, D.J.; Bradley, D.G. A genome wide association study for genetic susceptibility to Mycobacterium bovis infection in dairy cattle identifies a susceptibility QTL on chromosome 23. Genet. Sel. Evol. 2016, 48, 19–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Bermingham, M.L.; Bishop, S.C.; Woolliams, J.A.; Pon-Wong, R.; Allen, A.R.; McBride, S.H.; Ryder, J.J.; Wright, D.M.; Skuce, R.A.; McDowell, S.W. Genome wide association study identifies novel loci associated with resistance to bovine tuberculosis. Heredity 2014, 112, 543–551. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Finlay, E.K.; Berry, D.P.; Wickham, B.; Gormley, E.P.; Bradley, D.G. A genome wide association scan of bovine tuberculosis susceptibility in Holstein-Friesian dairy cattle. PLoS ONE 2012, 7, 30545. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Minozzi, G.; Buggiotti, L.; Stella, A.; Strozzi, F.; Luini, M.; Williamas, J.L. Genetic loci involved in antibody response to Mycobacterium avium ssp. paratuberculosis in cattle. PLoS ONE 2010, 5, 11117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Milián, F.; Harris, B.; Arriaga, C.; Thomsen, B.; Stuber, T.; González, D.; Álvarez, G.; Santillán, M.A.; Morales, A.; Estrada, C. Sensibilidad y especificidad de PCR anidada y spoligotyping como pruebas rápidas de diagnóstico de tuberculosis bovina en tejido fresco. Rev. Mex. Cienc. Pecu. 2010, 1, 403–415. [Google Scholar]
  25. González-Ruiz, S.; Verdugo-Escárcega, D.A.; Milián-Suazo, F.; Cantó-Alarcón, G.J.; Sosa-Gallegos, L. Prevalencia de Mycobacterium bovis en tejidos obtenidos de bovinos Holstein en rastros de los Altos de Jalisco. In Proceedings of the LII Reunión Anual de Investigación Pecuaria, Querétaro, Mexico, 30 November 2016; pp. 372–374. [Google Scholar]
  26. Payeur, B.J.; Jarnagin, L.J.; Marquardt, G.J.; Schaper, A.L.; Martin, M.B. Laboratory methods in veterinary mycobacteriology for the isolation and identification of mycobacteria. In Natural Veterinary Services Laboratory; United State Department of Agriculture: Ames, IA, USA, 1993. [Google Scholar]
  27. Darvasi, A.; Soller, M. Selective DNA pooling for determination of linkage between a molecular marker and a quantitative trait locus. Genetics 1994, 138, 1365–1373. [Google Scholar]
  28. Le Hellard, S.; Ballereau, S.J.; Visscher, P.M.; Torrance, H.S.; Pinson, J.; Morris, S.W.; Thomson, M.L.; Semple, C.A.; Muir, W.J.; Blackwood, D.H.; et al. SNP genotyping on pooled DNAs: Comparison of genotyping technologies and a semi automated method for data storage and analysis. Nucleic Acids Res. 2002, 30, 74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Janicki, P.K.; Liu, J. Accuracy of allele frequency estimates in pool DNA analyzed by high-Density Illumina Human 610-Quad microarray. Intern. J. Genom. Proteom. 2009, 5, 1. [Google Scholar]
  30. Strillacci, M.G.; Frigo, E.; Canavesi, F.; Ungar, Y.; Schiavini, F.; Zaniboni, L.; Reghenzani, L.; Cozzi, M.C.; Samoré, A.B.; Kashi, Y.; et al. Quantitative trait loci mapping for conjugated linoleic acid, vaccenic acid and Δ9-Desaturase in Italian Brown Swiss dairy cattle using selective DNA pooling. Anim. Genet. 2014, 45, 485–499. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Lipkin, E.; Strillacci, M.G.; Eitam, H.; Yishay, M.; Schiavini, F.; Soller, M.; Bagnato, A.; Shabtay, A. The Use of Kosher Phenotyping for Mapping QTL Affecting Susceptibility to Bovine Respiratory Disease. PLoS ONE 2016, 11, 0153423. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Peletto, S.; Strillacci, M.G.; Capucchioc, M.T.; Biasibettic, E.; Modesto, P.; Acutis, P.L.; Bagnato, A. Genetic basis of Lipomatous Myopathy in Piedmontese beef cattle. Livest. Sci. 2017, 206, 9–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Macgregor, S. Most pooling variation in array-Based DNA pooling is attributable to array error rather than pool construction error. Eur. J. Hum. Genet. 2007, 15, 501–504. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Macgregor, S.; Zhao, Z.Z.; Henders, A.; Nicholas, M.G.; Montgomery, G.W.; Visscher, P.M. Highly cost-Efficient genome-Wide association studies using DNA pools and dense SNP arrays. Nucleic Acids Res. 2008, 36, 35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Fernando, R.L.; Nettleton, D.; Southey, B.R.; Dekkers, J.C.M.; Rothschild, M.F.; Soller, M. Controlling the proportion of false positives in multiple dependent tests. Genetics 2004, 166, 611–619. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Nicolazzi, E.L.; Picciolini, M.; Strozzi, F.; Schnabel, R.D.; Lawley, C.; Pirani, A.; Breu, F.; Stella, A. SNPchiMp: A database to disentangle the SNPchip jungle in bovine livestock. BMC Genom. 2014, 15, 123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. European Variation Archive. 2017. Available online: https://www.ebi.ac.uk/eva/?Home (accessed on 21 September 2017).
  38. Ensembl Project. 1999. Available online: http://www.ensembl.org/biomart/martview/502ede1207156b60a738ec6c34389633 (accessed on 18 November 2017).
  39. Huang, D.W.; Sherman, B.T.; Lempicki, R.A. Systematic and integrative analysis of large gene lists using DAVID Bioinformatics Resources. Nat. Protoc. 2009, 4, 44–57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. National Animal Genome Research Program. USDA-NRI. 2003–2018. Available online: https://www.animalgenome.org (accessed on 12 March 2018).
  41. Hawn, T.T.; Day, T.A.; Scriba, T.J.; Hatherill, M.; Hanekom, W.A.; Evans, T.G.; Churchyard, G.J.; Kublin, J.G.; Bekker, L.G.; Self, S.G. Tuberculosis Vaccines and Prevention of Infection. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 2014, 78, 650–671. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  42. Tsairidou, S.; Woolliams, J.A.; Allen, A.R.; Skuce, R.A.; McBride, S.H.; Wright, D.M.; Bermingham, M.L.; Pong-Wong, R.; Matika, O.; McDowell, S.W.J. Genomic prediction for Tuberculosis resistance in dairy cattle. PLoS ONE 2014, 9, 96728. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Richardson, I.W.; Bradley, D.G.; Higgins, I.M.; More, S.J.; McClure, J.; Berry, D.P. Variance components for susceptibility to Mycobacterium bovis infection in dairy and beef cattle. Genet. Sel. Evol. 2014, 46, 77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Curtis, J.; Luo, Y.; Zenner, H.L.; Cuchet-Lourenc, D.; Wu, C.; Lo, K.; Maes, M.; Alisaaca, A.; Stebbings, E.; Liu, J.C.; et al. Susceptibility to tuberculosis is associated with variants in the ASAP1 gene encoding a regulator of dendritic cell migration. Nat. Genet. 2015, 47, 523–527. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  45. Sobota, R.S.; Stein, C.M.; Kodaman, N.; Scheinfeldt, L.B.; Maro, I.; Wieland-Alter, W.; Igo, R.P.; Magohe, A.; Malone, L.L.; Chervenak, K. A Locus at 5q33.3 Confers Resistance to Tuberculosis in Highly Susceptible Individuals. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 2016, 98, 514–524. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  46. Raphaka, K.; Matika, O.; Sánchez-Molano, E.; Mrode, R.; Coffey, M.P.; Riggio, V.; Glas, E.J.; Woolliams, J.A.; Bishop, S.C.; Banos, G. Genomic regions underlying susceptibility to bovine tuberculosis in Holstein-Friesian cattle. BMC Genet. 2017, 18, 27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Hasenauer, F.C.; Garbaccio, S.G.; Caffaro, M.E.; Garro, C.; Huertas, P.; Poli, M.A.; Rossetti, C.A. Exploring the association between polymorphisms at 3′UTR SLC11A1 gene microsatellites and resistance to tuberculosis: A case-Control study in Bos taurus dairy cattle. Livest. Sci. 2018, 210, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Banos, G.; Winters, M.; Mrode, R.; Mitchell, A.P.; Bishop, S.C.; Woolliams, J.A.; Coffey, M.P. Genetic evaluation for bovine tuberculosis resistance in dairy cattle. J. Dairy Sci. 2017, 100, 1272–1281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Kurtulus, S.; Sakuishi, K.; Ngiow, S.F.; Joller, N.; Tan, D.J.; Teng, M.W.; Smyth, M.J.; Kuchroo, V.K.; Anderson, A.C. TIGIT predominantly regulates the immune response via regulatory T cells. J. Clin. Investig. 2015, 125, 4053–4062. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  50. Joller, N.; Hafler, J.P.; Brynedal, B.; Kassam, N.; Spoerl, S.; Levin, S.D.; Arle, H.; Sharpe, K. TIGIT has T cell-Intrinsic inhibitory functions. J. Immunol. 2011, 186, 1338–1342. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Whitaker, H.C.; Shiong, L.L.; Kay, J.D.; Grönberg, H.; Warren, A.Y.; Seipel, A.; Wiklund, F.; Thomas, B.; Wiklund, P.; Miller, J.L. N-Acetyl-L-Aspartyl-L-Glutamate peptidase-Like 2 is overexpressed in cancer and promotes a pro-Migratory and pro-Metastatic phenotype. Oncogene 2014, 33, 5274–5287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Demy, D.L.; Tauzin, M.; Lancino, M.; Le Cabec, V.; Redd, M.; Murayama, E.; Maridonneau-Parini, I.; Trede, N.; Herbomel, P. Trim33 is essential for macrophage and neutrophil mobilization to developmental or inflammatory cues. J. Cell. Sci. 2017, 130, 2797–2807. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Weng, L.; Mitoma, H.; Tricot, C.; Boo, M.; Liu, Y.; Zhang, Z.; Liu, Y.J. The E3 Ubiquitin Ligase Tripartite Motif 33 Is Essential for Cytosolic RNA–Induced NLRP3 Inflammasome Activation. J. Immunol. 2014, 193, 3676–3682. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Fjeldborg, K.; Møller, H.J.; Richelsen, B.; Pedersen, S.B. Regulation of CD163 mRNA and soluble CD163 protein in human adipose tissue in vitro. J. Mol Endocrinol. 2014, 53, 227–235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. National Center for Biotechnology Information. Available online: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/gene/100125389 (accessed on 3 April 2018).
  56. GeneCards®: The Human Gene Database. Weizmann Institute of Science. Available online: https://www.genecards.org/cgi-bin/carddisp.pl?gene=KIF16B (accessed on 3 April 2018).
  57. Newman, J.H.; Holt, T.N.; Hedges, L.K.; Womack, B.; Memon, S.S.; Willers, E.D.; Wheeler, L.; Phillips, J.A.; Hamid, R. High-Altitude pulmonary hypertension in cattle (brisket disease): Candidate genes and gene expression profiling of peripheral blood mononuclear cells. Pulm. Circ. 2011, 1, 462–469. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Clark, D.L.; Boler, D.D.; Kutzler, L.W.; Jones, K.A.; McKeith, F.K.; Killefer, J.; Carr, T.R.; Dilger, A.C. Muscle gene expression associated with increased marbling in beef cattle. Anim. Biotechnol. 2011, 22, 51–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Pires, D.; Bernard, E.M.; Pombo, J.P.; Carmo, N.; Fialho, C.; Gutierrez, M.G.; Bettencourt, P.; Anes, E. Mycobacterium tuberculosis Modulates miR-106b-5p to Control Cathepsin S Expression Resulting in Higher Pathogen Survival and Poor T-Cell Activation. Front. Immunol. 2017, 8, 1819. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  60. Bragina, E.Y.; Tiys, E.S.; Rudko, A.A.; Ivanisenko, V.A.; Freidin, M.B. Novel tuberculosis susceptibility candidate genes revealed by the reconstruction and analysis of associative networks. Infect. Genet. Evol. 2016, 46, 118–123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Jenum, S.; Bakken, R.; Dhanasekaran, S.; Mukherjee, A.; Lodha, R.; Singh, S.; Haks, M.C.; Ottenhoff, T.H.M.; Kabra, K.; Doherty, T.M. BLR1 and FCGR1A transcripts in peripheral blood associate with the extent of intrathoracic tuberculosis in children and predict treatment outcome. Sci. Rep. 2016, 12, 6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Booty, M.G.; Barreira-Silva, P.; Carpenter, S.M.; Nunes-Alves, C.; Jacques, M.K.; Stowell, B.L.; Jayaraman, P.; Beamer, G.; Behar, S.M. IL-21 signaling is essential for optimal host resistance against Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection. Sci. Rep. 2016, 7, 6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Gomes-Pereira, S.; Rodrigues, P.N.; Appelberg, R.; Gomes, M.S. Increased susceptibility to Mycobacterium avium in hemochromatosis protein HFE-deficient mice. Infect. Immun. 2008, 76, 4713–4719. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Moalem, S.; Weinberg, E.D.; Percy, M.E. Hemochromatosis and the enigma of misplaced iron: Implications for infectious disease and survival. Biometals 2004, 17, 135–139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Wang, L.; Johnson, E.E.; Shi, H.N.; Walker, W.A.; Wessling-Resnick, M.; Cherayil, B.J. Attenuated inflammatory responses in hemochromatosis reveal a role for iron in the regulation of macrophage cytokine translation. J. Immunol. 2008, 15, 2723–2731. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Horne, D.J.; Randhawa, A.K.; Chau, T.T.; Bang, N.D.; Yen, N.T.; Farrar, J.J.; Dunstan, S.J.; Haen, T.R. Common polymorphisms in the PKP3-SIGIRR-TMEM16J gene region are associated with susceptibility to tuberculosis. J. Infect. Dis. 2012, 205, 586–594. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Riva, F.; Bonavita, E.; Barbati, E.; Muzio, M.; Mantovani, A.; Garlanda, C. TIR8/SIGIRR is an Interleukin-1 Receptor/Toll Like Receptor Family Member with Regulatory Functions in Inflammation and Immunity. Front. Immunol. 2012, 3, 322. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Animals 09 00636 g001 550
Figure 1. Tracheobronchial lymph nodes with visible lesions of Bovine tuberculosis (bTB) (A). Colonies of M. bovis in Stonebrink media (B).
Figure 1. Tracheobronchial lymph nodes with visible lesions of Bovine tuberculosis (bTB) (A). Colonies of M. bovis in Stonebrink media (B).
Animals 09 00636 g001
Animals 09 00636 g002 550
Figure 2. Manhattan plots of QTLR (Quantitative Trait Loci Regions) for all chromosomes. Horizontal lines represent the 1% PFP (proportion of false positives) (blue), the 5% PFP (light blue), and the 10% PFP (black) thresholds.
Figure 2. Manhattan plots of QTLR (Quantitative Trait Loci Regions) for all chromosomes. Horizontal lines represent the 1% PFP (proportion of false positives) (blue), the 5% PFP (light blue), and the 10% PFP (black) thresholds.
Animals 09 00636 g002
Animals 09 00636 g003 550
Figure 3. Gene networks in cattle among the ones in QTLRs identified with PFP at 10% (Bovine and Human databases).
Figure 3. Gene networks in cattle among the ones in QTLRs identified with PFP at 10% (Bovine and Human databases).
Animals 09 00636 g003
Animals 09 00636 g004 550
Figure 4. The location of MACROD2 gene is spread over the QTLRs 95–98 (NCBI refseq gene 105).
Figure 4. The location of MACROD2 gene is spread over the QTLRs 95–98 (NCBI refseq gene 105).
Animals 09 00636 g004
Table
Table 1. Scheme of case (CA) and controls (CT) pool definitions, and of genotyping.
Table 1. Scheme of case (CA) and controls (CT) pool definitions, and of genotyping.
CASESCONTROLS
BiologicalTechnicalBiologicalTechnical
Bio_rep aPool_Rep bArray_Rep cBio_rep aPool_Rep bArray_Rep c
CA_1CA1_ACA_1A_1CT_1CT1_ACT_1A_1
CA_1A_2CT_1A_2
CA_1A_3CT_1A_3
CA1_BCA_1B_1CT1_BCT_1B_1
CA_1B_2CT_1B_2
CA_1B_3CT_1B_3
CA_2CA2_ACA_2A_1CT_2CT2_ACT_2A_1
CA_2A_2CT_2A_2
CA_2A_3CT_2A_3
CA2_BCA_2B_1CT2_BCT_2B_1
CA_2B_2CT_2B_2
CA_2B_3CT_2B_3
CT_3CT3_ACT_3A_1
CT_3A_3
CT_3A_3
CT3_BCT_3B_1
CT_3B_3
CT_3B_3
a Bio_rep = biological replicate; b Pool_Rep = technical pooling replicate; c Array_Rep = technical array replicate.
Table
Table 2. Results of the gene annotation: DAVID GO and pathway analysis (KEGG).
Table 2. Results of the gene annotation: DAVID GO and pathway analysis (KEGG).
TermCountp-ValueGenes
Biological process
GO:0006334: nucleosome assembly69.42 × 105HIST1H2BB, HIST1H1C, HIST1H1A, H2B, HIST1H3G, HIST1H3I
GO:0006335: DNA replication-dependent nucleosome assembly36.12 × 103H4, HIST1H3G, HIST1H3I
GO:0051290: protein heterotetramerization36.81 × 103H4, HIST1H3G, HIST1H3I
GO:0098792: xenophagy52.27 × 103TMEM39A, SNRPB2, CPA3, HIST1H3G, HIST1H3I
GO:0002230: positive regulation of defense response to virus by host53.68 × 103TMEM39A, SNRPB2, CPA3, HIST1H3G, HIST1H3I
GO:0046627: negative regulation of insulin receptor signaling pathway39.09 × 103PRKCD, KANK1, PRKCB
GO:0042742: defense response to bacterium41.63 × 102STAB1, FCGR1A, PRKCD, TMF1
Cellular Components
GO:0000786: nucleosome71.60 × 105H4, HIST1H1C, HIST1H1A, H2B, HIST1H2AK, HIST1H3G, HIST1H3I
GO:0000788: nuclear nucleosome52.47 × 104HIST1H2BB, H2B, HIST1H3G, HIST1H3I
GO:0000784: nuclear chromosome, telomeric region42.3 × 102H4, TNKS, HIST1H3G, HIST1H3I
GO:0030176: integral component of endoplasmic reticulum membrane41.50 × 102PIGG, SARAF, MBOAT4, SLC27A2
GO:0005615: extracellular space133.32 × 102A2M, H2B, HFE, FSTL1, CTSS, OVOS2, ESF1, VEGFC, GPI, CTSK, CPA3, CPB1, SMARCA4
GO:0005788: endoplasmic reticulum lumen34.77 × 102EOGT, SLC27A2, POGLUT1
Molecular Functions
GO:0046982: protein heterodimerization activity57.15 × 103AGTR1, HIST1H2BB, H4, H2B, FOXP1
GO:0042393: histone binding33.67 × 102H4, PRKCB, SMARCA4
KEGG Pathways
bta05322: Systemic lupus erythematosus97.64 × 108HIST1H2BB, H4, CD80, FCGR1A, HIST2H2BF, H2B, HIST1H2AK, HIST1H3G, HIST1H3I
bta05034: Alcoholism84.32 × 106HIST1H2BB, HRAS, H4, HIST2H2BF, H2B, HIST1H2AK, HIST1H3G, HIST1H3I
bta05203: Viral carcinogenesis51.92 × 103HIST1H2BB, HRAS, H4, HIST2H2BF, H2B
bta00514: Other types of O-glycan biosynthesis32.18 × 102ST6GAL2, EOGT, POGLUT1

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

González-Ruiz, S.; Strillacci, M.G.; Durán-Aguilar, M.; Cantó-Alarcón, G.J.; Herrera-Rodríguez, S.E.; Bagnato, A.; Guzmán, L.F.; Milián-Suazo, F.; Román-Ponce, S.I. Genome-Wide Association Study in Mexican Holstein Cattle Reveals Novel Quantitative Trait Loci Regions and Confirms Mapped Loci for Resistance to Bovine Tuberculosis. Animals 2019, 9, 636. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani9090636

AMA Style

González-Ruiz S, Strillacci MG, Durán-Aguilar M, Cantó-Alarcón GJ, Herrera-Rodríguez SE, Bagnato A, Guzmán LF, Milián-Suazo F, Román-Ponce SI. Genome-Wide Association Study in Mexican Holstein Cattle Reveals Novel Quantitative Trait Loci Regions and Confirms Mapped Loci for Resistance to Bovine Tuberculosis. Animals. 2019; 9(9):636. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani9090636

Chicago/Turabian Style

González-Ruiz, Sara, Maria G. Strillacci, Marina Durán-Aguilar, Germinal J. Cantó-Alarcón, Sara E. Herrera-Rodríguez, Alessandro Bagnato, Luis F. Guzmán, Feliciano Milián-Suazo, and Sergio I. Román-Ponce. 2019. "Genome-Wide Association Study in Mexican Holstein Cattle Reveals Novel Quantitative Trait Loci Regions and Confirms Mapped Loci for Resistance to Bovine Tuberculosis" Animals 9, no. 9: 636. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani9090636

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop