Next Article in Journal
Operational Details of the Five Domains Model and Its Key Applications to the Assessment and Management of Animal Welfare
Next Article in Special Issue
Characteristics and Outcomes of Dogs Admitted into Queensland RSPCA Shelters
Previous Article in Journal
Erratum: Caroline Good; et al.; A Cultural Conscience for Conservation. Animals 2017, 7, 52
Previous Article in Special Issue
Surrendered and Stray Dogs in Australia—Estimation of Numbers Entering Municipal Pounds, Shelters and Rescue Groups and Their Outcomes
Open AccessArticle

Stated Preferences for Dog Characteristics and Sources of Acquisition

1
Department of Agricultural Economics, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 47907, USA
2
Department of Comparative Pathobiology, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 47907, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Animals 2017, 7(8), 59; https://doi.org/10.3390/ani7080059
Received: 20 June 2017 / Revised: 22 July 2017 / Accepted: 3 August 2017 / Published: 5 August 2017
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Animal Sheltering)
People’s preferences for where they acquire dogs and the characteristics they focus on may provide insight into their perceptions of socially responsible pet ownership, as acquiring a dog is the first step in dog ownership. An online survey of 1523 U.S. residents was used to aid understanding of public perceptions of dog acquisition. Likert-scale questions allowed respondents to assign a level of agreement, within the given scale, to ten statements related to dog acquisition. A significantly higher percentage of women (39.6%) than men (31.7%) agreed that the only responsible way to acquire a dog is through a shelter/rescue. More women (71.3%) than men (66.4%), as well as those with a higher household income (71%), identified source as important. Best-worst methodology was used to elicit perceptions regarding the most/least ethical ways to acquire a dog. Three subgroups were identified, one of which had an overwhelmingly large preference share (96%) for adoption. The second group had more evenly distributed preference shares amongst the various dog acquisition methods, while the third indicated a preference for “homeless” pets. Additional investigation of the values/beliefs underlying the preferences of these groups is necessary to design appropriately tailored companion animal-focused communication strategies for these different groups. View Full-Text
Keywords: dog acquisition; public perception; best-worst, preferences dog acquisition; public perception; best-worst, preferences
Show Figures

Figure 1

MDPI and ACS Style

Bir, C.; Widmar, N.J.O.; Croney, C.C. Stated Preferences for Dog Characteristics and Sources of Acquisition. Animals 2017, 7, 59. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani7080059

AMA Style

Bir C, Widmar NJO, Croney CC. Stated Preferences for Dog Characteristics and Sources of Acquisition. Animals. 2017; 7(8):59. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani7080059

Chicago/Turabian Style

Bir, Courtney; Widmar, Nicole J.O.; Croney, Candace C. 2017. "Stated Preferences for Dog Characteristics and Sources of Acquisition" Animals 7, no. 8: 59. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani7080059

Find Other Styles
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

1
Search more from Scilit
 
Search
Back to TopTop