Advancements in Sustainable Livestock Feed: Harnessing Drought-Tolerant Crops
Simple Summary
Abstract
1. Introduction
2. Main Drivers to the Use of Drought-Resilient Crops as Livestock Feed
3. Classification of Drought-Resilient Crops
3.1. Types of Drought-Tolerant Crops and Their Mechanisms of Action
3.1.1. Drought-Tolerant Crops Utilizing the C4 Photosynthetic Pathway
3.1.2. Drought-Tolerant Crops Utilizing the CAM Photosynthetic Pathway
4. Recent Studies on the Utilization of Key Drought-Tolerant Crops in Livestock Feeding Systems
4.1. Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench
4.2. Pennisetum glaucum (L.) R. Br and Eleusine coracana (L.) Gaertn.
4.3. Ensete ventricosum (Welw.) Cheesman
4.4. Manihot esculenta Crantz
4.5. Opuntia ficus-indica (L.) Mill.
4.6. Other Drought-Tolerant Crops
| Crop | Processing Method | Experimental Model | Targeted Animal | Parameters Measured | Key Findings | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sorghum | Dried SDDGS | Hereford steers (331.2 ± 33.5 kg) were fed inclusion levels SDDGS (0, 150, 300, 450 g/kg) for 12 weeks against a control (sorghum grain, SFM and urea) | Cattle | Performance indices such as intake and digestibility indices were evaluated. | Inclusion of SDDGS increased intake of CP and GE. | [127] |
| BMR mutant lines of sorghum samples were prepared into forage and dried at 65 °C. | In vitro digestion using rumen fluid obtained from two fistulated Friesian Holstein cattle weighing approx. 525 kg. | Cattle | In vitro DM digestibility and in vitro true digestibility were analyzed from the obtained samples. | Cultivar GH2.3 had the highest digestibility of DM. Bioguma and GH2.3 had highest DMI and digestibility. In vitro true digestibility of Bioguma was observed higher than other cultivars. | [128] | |
| Whole green SW was harvested, chopped and sun-dried. | A total of 144 male Yuzhou goslings (28 days old) were fed with 0, 4, 8 and 12% SW, replacing maize meal. | Goose | Body weight, daily feed intake, ADG, blood composition, antioxidant capacity and intestinal morphology were evaluated. | Increase in SW levels increased ADI and F:G ratio during 28–70 days of feeding. | [70] | |
| The mixed fodder, with maize as the main component, was prepared by grinding, mixing and pelletizing | ROSS-308 chickens were fed mixed fodder containing 20–40% sorghum grain for 28 days. | Chicken | Carcass characteristics, such as daily weight gain, were monitored during the experiments. Effects on chicken productivity were also observed. | During the second week of chicken rearing, average daily weight gain increased from the diet that consisted of 30% sorghum grain. | [15] | |
| Supplied sorghum seeds were stored in a dry environment and ground using a roller mill. | Twenty lactating buffalo cows were fed diets with sorghum or maize once a day for about 7 weeks. | Cattle | Milk production, digestibility and carcass scores were analyzed. | Higher milk yield was obtained in the diet that had sorghum compared to the maize diet. | [14] | |
| Sorghum silage feed diet was developed using an ensiling technique. | Silage of varying proportions from maize and sorghum were fed to mid lactating Holstein dairy cows. | Cattle | Analysis of resultant serum metabolites was conducted on the samples at day 45. | Chromatographic analysis of blood serum revealed presence of linoleic acid, succinic acid, 2-ethylacrylic acid, and glutamic acid levels. | [72] | |
| Millet | Pearl millet samples were ground into powder. | A total of 300 laying hens were fed on a diet that contained various levels of pearl millet replacing 25, 50 and 75% of maize. | Chicken | Every 4th week hen weight and total feed consumption was recorded. Broiler performance was also recorded on starter, grower and finisher broiler. | Broilers that consumed 0–14% whole pearl millet diet had higher body weight gain than those that consumed 28 and 43%. | [78] |
| Gayamba pearl millet was purchased from local markets, boiled for 30 min sun dried for 4 days. | A total of Cobb 500 broiler chickens were fed treatments containing starter and finisher diets replacing red sorghum. | Chicken | Daily feed intake, daily weight gain and FCR were measured. | The total feed intake for Gayamba pearl millet diet was observed higher at level 4 during the finisher period. | [79] | |
| The finger millet sample passed through roasting at 115 °C for 15 min in an oven and ground into powder. | The feed formulations were prepared for chickens housed in well-ventilated cages. | Chicken | Fat deposition assessments. | Fat deposition was reduced while an increase in lean tissue was observed. | [129] | |
| The straw used was obtained as the result of finger millet processing by product. | The formulated diets had various amounts of finger millet straw which were fed to crossbred rams. | Sheep | Carcass traits, the presence of blood metabolites and the resultant meat quality were assessed. | ADG was higher in livestock that were fed 25% of finger millet straw. Blood metabolite analysis revealed high presence of total protein in the group fed 50% of finger millet straw. | [130] | |
| The pearl millet was obtained as a whole grain from a local supplier. | Starter and finisher diets were formulated emphasizing millet grains as energy suppliers and fed to 28-day-old broiler chickens, ad libitum. | Chicken | The morphological changes in the structure of the gizzard were recorded. | Increased weight of the gizzard and thick muscles such as Musculus crassus cranioventralis and Musculus crassus caudodorsalis | [131] | |
| Black and red finger millet grains were purchased from a nearby market and milled into fine powder. | Feed formulations of 0, 25, 50, 75 and 100% made from black and red finger millet to replace maize were fed to 600 chicks who fed for 28 days. | Chicken | Carcass traits and relevant growth performance indices were assessed. | The chickens that were reared red finger millet had higher final weight compared to those that consumed black finger millet. | [132] | |
| Millet and maize sample preparation included drying (65 °C) and milling into fine powder before diet formulation. | Diets of different millet and maize combinations formulated before being given to cannulated cows. | Cattle | In situ digestibility, assessment of ruminal composition and microbial diversity were investigated. | Fungal population of Basidiomycota when cattle were fed a 50:50 mill: maize combination exponentially increased at 12th hour interval of sample analysis. | [84] | |
| Finger millet straw samples were formulated using the extrusion technique. | A total of 24 Mandya lambs were fed complete feeds that contained extruded finger millet straw. | Sheep | Daily intake, DMI and FCR were assessed. | Rumen in vitro gas production was observed in finger millet straw compared to extruded feeds from areca sheath and maize cob. | [76] | |
| Pearl millet grains were sterilized in a saline solution and left to sprout at room temperature for 3 days. Thereafter the sprouts were sun-dried. | A sprouted whole grain millet was incorporated at 25, 50, 75 and 100% in starter and finisher diets of broiler chickens. | Chicken | Growth performance and organ development were analyzed. | Cholesterol levels increased with an increase in sprouted whole grain millet inclusion. Liver weight showed linear response to the incremental inclusion of sprouted whole grain millet. | [133] | |
| Pearl millet was obtained through the extrusion process and developed into varying degrees. | The extruded pearl millet replaced maize at levels of 25, 50, 75 and 100% and fed to broilers. | Chicken | Carcass performance parameters were recorded. | The treatment with 75% pearl millet achieved better live and breast weight gain. | [134] | |
| Two methods (grinding and pelleting) were used to create a pelleted and mashed pearl millet-based diet. | Levels of mashed and pelleted millet (50, 75 and 100%) were used to replace maize in broiler chicken diets. | Chicken | The influence of the diet on the growth performance parameters was analyzed. | Pelleted diet did not influence the carcass characteristics of the broilers. | [13] | |
| Feed rations were made from CORM to replace maize at levels of 0–45% by weight; created through milling to a size of 5 mm. | A total of 192 Cobb chickens were used as experimental livestock, feeding them for 42 days. | Chicken | DMI, ADG and egg production were evaluated. | The 45% enset corm feed resulted in a significantly higher DMI compared to other treatments. | [86] | |
| False banana | Ensete sample was chopped and dried using shade drying. | A feed made from replacing wheat bran with enset corm was offered to 42 intact male yearling rams. | Sheep | Livestock feed intake, changes in body weight and feed conversion efficiency were analyzed. | Body weight gain, during the 4th feeding week was with the diets that included 45, 90 and 135 g of enset corm. | [16] |
| Cassava | Cassava residues were obtained as by products from cassava processing operations. | Cassava residues were included at different levels and fed to Holstein cows. | Cattle | In vitro gas production analysis, analysis of microbial crude protein and ammonia were conducted. | Cassava inclusion increased the pH after 48 h in vitro incubation and decreased production of ammonia-N. Cassava treatments (15, 20 and 25%) resulted in high levels of VFAs. | [135] |
| A blend of cassava peel and leaf was created at a ratio of 5:1. Fermentation with water and microbiome added to various diets. | The created blend was then reared into 24 pigs for 16 weeks feeding trial. | Pigs | Growth performance, hematological and biochemical parameters were measured. | The blend made from cassava parts did not negatively affect the measured parameters, suggesting a feasible replacement of maize. | [136] | |
| Cassava top and root were processed into small chips. Then cassava top-root ratio of 40:60 was processed into silos and ensiled for 14 days. | The silage was fed to beef cattle at different inclusion rates replacing feed concentrates. | Cattle | The pH, chemical composition, fermentation, carcass and blood metabolites were measured. | Digestibility of ADF and NDF were observed to be higher at the silage had 100% of cassava top and root chips. | [93] | |
| Cassava peel was obtained as a byproduct from the cassava tuber processing. | A 7-week feeding trial consisted of rearing four diets to grower pigs. | Pig | Growth indices were analyzed. | Diet with 50% of cassava peel exhibited gains in total and average weight, total and average daily feed intake. | [137] | |
| A cassava root meal was obtained. | The cassava root meal of 15, 30 and 45% were assigned to 140-day old chickens | Chicken | Nutrient digestibility, growth performance and organ development were assessed. | The study concludes a diet containing 15% of cassava root meal ideal to attain desired growth indices as well as chicken production. | [94] | |
| Cassava pulp ensiled with or without the inclusion of Lactobacillus casei TH14 (LTH14). | The treatments were then assigned to Thai-native beef bulls. | Cattle | Growth performance and digestibility indices were screened. | The cassava pulp ensiled with Lactobacillus casei TH14 (LTH14) produced higher CP digestibility and greater presence of VFAs. | [138] | |
| The sun-drying method was used to process graded cassava peels to replace maize at treatment levels of 18.5–74%. | Sun-dried cassava peel diets were reared to pregnant goats on a weekly basis. | Goat | Growth performance parameters were analyzed. | Treatment with 37% sun dried cassava peel had higher ADG. Also, a cassava dried peel at 74% was commendable for Soloko goats. | [11] | |
| A silage made by chopping cassava leaves and then sun dried for 4 h and stacked under anaerobic conditions for 21 days. | Experimental diets were derived by including sun dried cassava leaves at levels of 10–30% before being fed to pigs. | Pig | An analysis of growth and reproductive performance on pregnant pigs. | FCR increased with an increase in cassava leaves. | [139] | |
| Cassava leaves and peels were fermented with Citrobacter freundii 5519. | The fermented cassava peels and leaves were reared to Kamang ducks. | Duck | Changes in carcass traits, growth performance and meat quality were recorded. | Significant increases were observed in parameters such as weight gain and feed intake. | [140] | |
| O. ficus-indica | Spineless cacti were procured from a nearby farm. | Varying inclusions of cactus at 20 and 40% were fed to 18 Nellore lambs that had initial weights of 20.5 kg. | Sheep | A 5-day nutrient digestibility trial and proximate analysis of the diets was analyzed. | Nutrient digestibility of OM and DM was higher in treatments that had cactus. Water intake was observed to be low in Nellore lambs. | [141] |
| The cladodes were harvested, chopped and used on a fresh basis alongside a forage made from a 5-year-old saltbush. | Awassi sheep were fed two ratios of spineless cladodes and saltbush. | Sheep | Nutritional parameters, digestibility, growth performance and the presence of blood metabolites were screened. | Increasing the levels of cactus and saltbush in diets resulted in an increase in the digestibility of CP. | [142] | |
| A peel from a ripened fruit of cactus pear was sun dried and processed into powder to allow inclusion at various levels. | Commercial Cobb chickens were fed diets that were made up of prickly pear peels and yellow maize grain. | Chicken | Composition, carcass traits and histopathological results by the diets were investigated. | Feed intake and carcass traits (live body weight and FCR) were better with the diets that comprising 5, 10 and 15% cactus peel powder. | [102] | |
| O. ficus-indica cladodes were sun dried for 7 days and dried at 50 °C for 2 days before being crushed into fine powder. | The ground powders were fed into three groups of chickens with diets that contained 5 and 10% O. ficus-indica powders. | Chicken | The effects of O. ficus-indica cladode powder were analyzed on the growth and carcass characteristics of the reared chicks. | The 5% inclusion of cladode powder had better body weight gain over the 42-day feeding trial, compared to a control. Carcass characteristics of 10% Opuntia powder had better weight gain of liver, gizzard and abdominal fat. | [143] | |
| O. ficus-indica cladodes were tested on a fresh basis by including them in a pig diet. | O. ficus-indica was reared in gilts that were in their lactation and gestation phases. | Pig | The influence of O. ficus-indica on glucose and insulin concentrations, as well as feed intake was assessed. | The inclusion of O. ficus-indica positively influenced the levels of insulin in the blood of the gilts. Also, there was lower body weight loss. | [144] | |
| Cactus cladodes were dried with direct sunlight for 5 days. The dried cladodes were ground into fine powder using a hammer mill. | Diets were formed with varying inclusion levels of cactus powder and reared to dewormed Nguni heifers. | Cattle | Livestock growth performance, carcass traits and cost benefit analysis were investigated. | The 10 and 20% cactus cladode powder diets had better FCR than control or commercial feed. Cactus powder resulted in reduced expenditure on feed ingredients. | [145] | |
| Cactus cladodes were harvested during the winter season and sliced before being placed in an oven at 55 °C for a period of two weeks. | The dried samples were fed into a rumen fluid that was collected from fistulated steers. | Cattle | Fermentation patterns, water intake and chemical screenings were conducted. | Cactus diet had 6.64 mg/100 mL of ammonia nitrogen while alfalfa high amounts of 25.1 mg/100 mL. Cactus diet produced lower levels of 2.2% of methane compared to alfalfa (3.52%). | [12] | |
| The mucilage was obtained from the cladode of O. ficus-indica. | The mucilage was applied in sperm freezing extenders at various concentrations using sperm obtained from boar pigs. | Pig | Sperm quality attributes—motility, integrity, viability, morphology and motility—were analyzed. | A 6.7% addition of mucilage improved sperm characteristics such as viability and membrane integrity. | [105] | |
| The cladodes used in this study were sun-dried and oven dried for 14 and 4–5 days, respectively. | Powdered samples were then assigned to calves at 2.5 g/day. | Cattle | Livestock performance and fecal microbial count were analyzed. | The cladode powder reduced fecal pathogenic population of E. coli and Enterobacteriaceae, and total coliform count. | [106] |
5. Factors Affecting the Quality and Functionality of Drought-Tolerant Crops
5.1. Preharvest Factors
5.1.1. Cultivar
5.1.2. Harvest Maturity
| Crop Type | Maturity Stages | Key Findings | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sorghum | Milky, milky/dough, dough, dough/dent, dent, hard, dry | DM of the silage increased with grain maturity from 199 to 473 g/kg. Increments in pH levels were observed as a function of grain maturity which ensures good quality conservation of the silage. | [183] |
| Panicle emergence, milky, dough, physiological, bloom | As each plant matured, characteristics such as DM, plant height, protein content, and RFV also increased. Physiological maturity stage was advised at the suitable time for harvest as qualities of the fodder and high yield attributes were observed. | [182] | |
| Bloom, soft, hard, physiological, | Highest DM was obtained when the plant was harvested at physiological maturity. Highest IVDMD was observed at bloom stage. Conversely, fodder made from hard dough maturity stage yielded higher nutritive value when looking at elements such as CP, neutral and acid detergent fiber as well as acid detergent lignin. | [184] | |
| Late milk, dough, full maturity | DMY was enhanced between late milk and dough stages. Silage made from the whole crop produced a significant increase in ME during late milk and dough maturity stages. | [185] | |
| 3 weeks, boot, flower, dough | The flower maturity stage harvest displayed high content of DM. CP was declared low in the 3-week harvest while high in the dough stage. | [186] | |
| 6th, 12th day | The 12th day harvest produced the highest plant biomass compared to 6th day harvest. | [188] | |
| Mid-early, late | Crude ash content decreased with an increase in crop maturity. | [187] | |
| Milk, soft mass, hard mass, mature | Digestibility of DM increased with an increase in crop maturity. | [189] | |
| O. ficus-indica | Maturity measured at 15-day intervals. | Phenolic content was found to be 156.77 mg/100 g during the first harvest while the second harvest, known to be last stage maturation, produced elevated antioxidant capacities. | [190] |
| Young, intermediate, mature | Young and intermediate phases of African and erect prickly pears species exhibited elevated nutritional parameters that were regarded relevant for ruminant health. | [173] | |
| Early small sized, young cladodes | Medium-sized and aged cladodes exhibited appreciable antioxidant activity while early harvested cladodes had lower antiradical activity when tested using the ORAC test. Cell viability studies revealed minimal toxicity of the differently harvested cladodes with concentration ranging between 0.01 and 0.1 mg/mL. | [192] |
5.2. Processing Factors
5.2.1. Drying Techniques
5.2.2. Grinding and Pulverization
5.2.3. Ensiling
5.2.4. Storage
6. Challenges of Using Drought-Tolerant Crops as Livestock Feed
6.1. Disease and Mycotoxins Infestation, and Feed Safety
6.2. Low Crude Protein Content
| Alternative Feed Source | Crude Protein (% DM) | Targeted Livestock | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Prickly pear silage | 3.8 | Ruminants | [261] |
| PT1ecotype O. ficus-indica cladodes | 6.9 | N/A | [262] |
| PT5ecotype O. ficus-indica cladodes | 6.8 | N/A | [262] |
| Winter O. ficus-indica | 4.15 | Ruminants | [263] |
| Summer O. ficus-indica | 4.19 | Ruminants | [263] |
| Sundried cassava peel meal | 3.66 | N/A | [264] |
| Pineapple residue | 6 | Holstein cows | [265] |
| Pineapple waste silage | 6.2 | Myanmar local cattle | [266] |
| Winter Agave Americana L. | 5.16 | Ruminants | [263] |
| Summer Agave Americana L. | 6.30 | Ruminants | [263] |
| Cassava roots | 3 | N/A | [152] |
6.3. High Lignin Content and Limited Digestibility
6.4. Socio-Economic and Financial Challenges
7. Key Strategies for Sustainable Innovation for Drought-Tolerant Livestock Feed
7.1. Increased Awareness
7.2. Policy Reforms
7.3. Strengthening of Research Capacity
8. Conclusions and Prospects
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
Abbreviations
| 3-PGA | 3-Phosphoglyceric acid |
| AI | Artificial intelligence |
| ADF | Acid detergent fiber |
| ADG | Average daily gain |
| ADI | Average daily intake |
| ADL | Acid detergent lignin |
| ADP | Adenosine diphosphate |
| ATP | Adenosine triphosphate |
| AWG | Average weight gain |
| BMR | Brown midrib |
| CAGR | Compound annual growth rate |
| CAM | Crassulacean acid metabolism |
| CFU | Colony forming unit |
| CF | Crude fiber |
| CNN | Convolutional neural network |
| CP | Crude protein |
| CSA | Climate smart agriculture |
| DM | Dry matter |
| DMY | Dry matter yield |
| DPPH | 2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl |
| FAD | Flavin-adenine dinucleotide |
| FADH2 | Dihydroflavine adenine dinucleotide |
| FAO | Food and agricultural organization |
| FCR | Feed conversion ratio |
| FPCM | Fat and protein corrected milk |
| G3P | Glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate |
| GAE | Gallic acid equivalent |
| GE | Gross energy |
| IVDMD | In vitro dry matter digestibility |
| IVOMD | In vitro organic matter digestibility |
| LAB | Lactic acid bacteria |
| LWG | Liveweight gain |
| ME | Metabolizable energy |
| MRSA | Methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus |
| NAD | Nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide |
| NADH | Nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide plus hydrogen |
| NADP+ | Nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide phosphate (oxidized) |
| NADP | Nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide diphosphate |
| NADPH | Nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide phosphate (reduced) |
| NDF | Neutral detergent fiber |
| NFE | Nitrogen free extract |
| OAA | Oxaloacetic acid |
| OM | Organic matter |
| ORAC | Oxygen radical absorbance capacity |
| PEP | Phosphoenol pyruvate |
| RGB | Red green blue |
| RFV | Relative feed value |
| RuBp | Ribulose-1,5-bisphosphate |
| SDDGs | Soluble dried distiller’s grains |
| SFM | Sunflower meal |
| SW | Sweet sorghum |
| WSC | Water soluble carbohydrates |
| WUE | Water use efficiency |
References
- Boyomo, H.A.A.; Nkoa, B.E.O.; Manga, L.A.A. Climate change and livestock production in Sub-Saharan Africa: Effects and transmission channels. Food Energy Secur. 2024, 13, 521. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Herrero, M.; do Valle, C.B.; Hughes, N.R.G.; Sabatel, V.d.O.; Jessop, N.S. Measurements of physical strength and their relationship to the chemical composition of four species of Brachiaria. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 2001, 92, 149–158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Godde, C.M.; Mason-D’Croz, D.; Mayberry, D.E.; Thornton, P.K.; Herrero, M. Impacts of climate change on the livestock food supply chain; a review of the evidence. Glob. Food Secur. 2021, 28, 100488. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Makkar, H.P.S. Review: Feed demand landscape and implications of food-not feed strategy for food security and climate change. Animal 2018, 12, 1744–1754. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Mbambalala, L.; Rani, Z.T.; Mpanza, T.D.E.; Mthana, M.S.; Ncisana, L.; sMkhize, N.R. Fodder radish as a potential alternative feed source for livestock in South Africa. Agriculture 2023, 13, 1625. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Alimi, N.; Assani, A.S.; Sanni Worogo, H.; Baco, N.M.; Traoré, I.A. Livestock feed resources used as alternatives during feed shortages and their impact on the environment and ruminant performance in West Africa: A Systematic review. Front. Vet. Sci. 2024, 11, 1352235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Islami, R.Z.; Utomo, D.; Budiawati, Y.; Ageng, S. Potential of agricultural by-products and waste as ruminant animal feed: A systematic literature review. Res. Sq. 2025; preprint. [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Mohammed, B.; Martin, G.; Laila, M.K. Nutritive values of the drought tolerant food and fodder crop enset. Afr. J. Agric. Res. 2013, 8, 2326–2333. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Nguyen, V.; Riley, S.; Nagel, S.; Fisk, I.; Searle, I.R. Common Vetch: A Drought Tolerant, High Protein Neglected Leguminous Crop with Potential as a Sustainable Food Source. Front. Plant Sci. 2020, 11, 818. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Shaffril, M.H.A.; Samah, A.A.; Samsuddin, S.F.; Ahmad, N.; Tangang, F.; Sidique, S.F.A.; Rahman, H.A.; Burhan, N.A.S.; Shah, J.A.; Khalid, N.A. Diversification of agriculture practices as a response to climate change impacts among farmers in low-income countries: A systematic literature review. Clim. Serv. 2024, 35, 100508. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Balogun, B.I.; Omodara, A.A.; Owoyele, O.O. Effects of sun-dried cassava peels on growth performance in Red Sokoto does (Capra aegagrus hircus) during gestation. Sci. World J. 2025, 19, 1062–1067. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- da Silva, A.E.M.; Macias Franco, A.; Solomon, J.K.Q.; da Freiria, L.B.; de Moura, F.H.; Mazza, P.H.; Birkenstock, B.; Bezerra, L.R.; Shenkoru, T.; Fonseca, M.A. Cactus (Opuntia ficus-indica) diets reduce voluntary water intake, water footprint and enteric methane production improving ruminal fermentation in steers. J. Arid. Environ. 2025, 227, 105311. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Hafeni-Shihepo, S. Production performance of broiler chickens fed mash and pelleted pearl millet-based diets. S. Afr. J. Anim. Sci. 2025, 54, 575–582. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Pontieri, P.; Del Giudice, L.; Masucci, F.; Di Francia, A.; Lambiase, C.; Scalera, G.; Troisi, J.; Aramouni, F.; Smolensky, D.; Tilley, M.; et al. The potential of sorghum meal as a replacement of corn meal in the diet for lactating buffaloes: Impacts on milk yield and nutrient digestibility. Ital. J. Anim. Sci. 2025, 24, 1415–1426. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Shavazov, K.; Mamatkulov, R.; Tursunov, S.; Hayitov, B.; Izbasarova, Z. Addition of sorghum grain to broiler chicken diets and its effect on productivity and safety. BIO Web Conf. 2025, 161, 00066. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Abebe, M. Evaluation of Replacing Wheat Bran with Ensete ventricosum Corm on Feed Intake, Weight Gain, In Vitro Digestibility and Economic Efficiency of Doyogena Sheep. Master’s Thesis, Wachemo University, Hosaina, Ethiopia, 2024. Available online: https://hdl.handle.net/10568/159684 (accessed on 10 December 2025).
- Klinck, L.; Ayisi, K.K.; Isselstein, J. Drought-induced challenges and different responses by smallholder and semicommercial Livestock farmers in semiarid Limpopo, South Africa—An indicator-based assessment. Sustainability 2022, 14, 8796. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Sintayehu, D.W.; Alemayehu, S.; Terefe, T.; Tegegne, G.; Engdaw, M.M.; Gebre, L.; Tesfaye, L.; Doyo, J.; Reddy, R.U.; Girvetz, E. Effects of Drought on Livestock Production, Market Dynamics, and Pastoralists’ Adaptation Strategies in Semi-Arid Ethiopia. Climate 2025, 13, 65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Puerto Rico Department of Agriculture (ASDA). Summary of the Agricultural Losses During the 2015 Drought; ASDA: San Juan, PR, USA, 2016.
- Marsland, N. 2015–2016 El Nino Early Action and Response for Agriculture, Food Security and Nutrition; United Nations Human Settlements Programme (UN-Habitat): Addis Ababa, Ethiopia, 2016; Volume 52. [Google Scholar]
- Ainembabazi, J.H. The 2015–16 El Niño-induced drought crisis in Southern Africa: What do we learn from historical data? In Proceedings of the International Conference of Agricultural Economists (ICAE 2018), Vancouver, BC, Canada, 28 July–2 August 2018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ewbank, R.; Perez, C.; Cornish, H.; Worku, M.; Woldetsadik, S. Building resilience to El Niño-related drought: Experiences in early warning and early action from Nicaragua and Ethiopia. Disasters 2019, 43, S345–S367. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Júnior, R.d.S.N.; Sentelhas, P.C. Soybean-maize off-season double crop system in Brazil as affected by El Niño Southern Oscillation phases. Agric. Syst. 2019, 173, 254–267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Abebe, M.B.; Alem, Y. Drought, livestock holding and milk production: A difference-in-differences analysis. Eur. Rev. Agric. Econ. 2025, 52, 240–272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Kyaw, Y.; Nguyen, T.P.L.; Winijkul, E.; Xue, W.; Virdis, S.G.P. The Effect of Climate Variability on Cultivated Crops’ Yield and Farm Income in Chiang Mai Province, Thailand. Climate 2023, 11, 204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Ludher, E.; Teng, P. Climate Change in Southeast Asia Programme; ISEAS-Yusof Ishak Institute: Singapore, 2023. [Google Scholar]
- Bista, D.; Heckathorn, S.; Jayawardena, D.; Mishra, S.; Boldt, J. Effects of Drought on Nutrient Uptake and the Levels of Nutrient-Uptake Proteins in Roots of Drought-Sensitive and -Tolerant Grasses. Plants 2018, 7, 28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Fang, Y.; Xiong, L. General mechanisms of drought response and their application in drought resistance improvement in plants. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 2015, 72, 673–689. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Thabet, S.G.; Alqudah, A.M. Crops and Drought. In Encyclopedia of Life Sciences; Wiley: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2019; pp. 1–8. [Google Scholar]
- Shavrukov, Y.; Kurishbayev, A.; Jatayev, S.; Shvidchenko, V.; Zotova, L.; Koekemoer, F.; De Groot, S.; Soole, K.; Langridge, P. Early flowering as a drought escape mechanism in plants: How can it aid wheat production? Front. Plant Sci. 2017, 8, 302418. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Panda, D.; Mishra, S.S.; Behera, P.K. Drought tolerance in rice: Focus on recent mechanisms and approaches. Rice Sci. 2021, 28, 119–132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Aslam, M.; Maqbool, M.A.; Cengiz, R. Mechanisms of drought resistance. In Drought Stress in Maize (Zea mays L.) Effects, Resistance Mechanisms, Global Achievements and Biological Strategies for Improvement; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2015; pp. 19–36. [Google Scholar]
- Hasanuzzaman, M.; Shabala, L.; Brodribb, T.J.; Zhou, M.; Shabala, S. Understanding the role of physiological and agronomical traits during drought recovery as a determinant of differential drought stress tolerance in Barley. Agronomy 2022, 12, 2136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Yang, X.; Cushman, J.C.; Borland, A.M.; Edwards, E.J.; Wullschleger, S.D.; Tuskan, G.A.; Owen, N.A.; Griffiths, H.; Smith, J.A.C.; De Paoli, H.C.; et al. A roadmap for research on crassulacean acid metabolism (CAM) to enhance sustainable food and bioenergy production in a hotter, drier world. New Phytol. 2015, 207, 491–504. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Ghannoum, O. C4 photosynthesis and water stress. Ann. Bot. 2008, 103, 635–644. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Ronda, V.; Aruna, C.; Visarada, K.B.R.S.; Bhat, B.V. Sorghum for animal feed. In Breeding Sorghum for Diverse End Uses; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2019; pp. 229–238. [Google Scholar]
- Manole, D.; Giumba, A.M.; Ganea, L. Sorghum, an alternative in complementarity with corn, adapted to climate changes. Amzacea Village, Constanta County, Romania. Sci. Pap. Ser. Manag. Econ. Eng. Agric. Rural Dev. 2023, 23, 501–512. [Google Scholar]
- Lara, M.V.; Andreo, C.S.; Lara, M.V.; Andreo, C.S. C4 Plants Adaptation to High Levels of CO2 and to Drought Environments. In Abiotic Stress in Plants—Mechanisms and Adaptations; Intech Open: London, UK, 2011. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Crush, J.R.; Rowarth, J.S. The role of C4 grasses in New Zealand pastoral systems. N. Z. J. Agric. Res. 2007, 50, 125–137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Shah, W.H.; Saleem, S.; Mushtaq, N.U.; Rasool, A.; Tahir, I.; Rehman, R.U. C4 and CAM plants with better resilience to environmental stresses. In Photosynthesis and Respiratory Cycles During Environmental Stress Response in Plants; Apple Academic Press: Palm Bay, FL, USA, 2022; pp. 163–191. [Google Scholar]
- Taylor, J.R.N. Sorghum and millets: Taxonomy, history, distribution, and production. In Sorghum and Millets; AACC International Press: St. Paul, MN, USA, 2019; pp. 1–21. [Google Scholar]
- Limantara, L.; Dettling, M.; Indrawati, R.; Indriatmoko; Brotosudarmo, T.H.P. Analysis on the Chlorophyll Content of Commercial Green Leafy Vegetables. Procedia Chem. 2015, 14, 225–231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Langdale, J.A. C4 cycles: Past, present, and future research on C4 photosynthesis. Plant Cell 2011, 23, 3879–3892. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Yang, X.; Liu, Y.; Yuan, G.; Weston, D.J.; Tuskan, G.A. Engineering Crassulacean Acid Metabolism in C3 and C4 Plants. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Biol. 2023, 16, a041674. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Gilman, I.S.; Edwards, E.J. Crassulacean acid metabolism. Curr. Biol. 2020, 30, R57–R62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Zea, L.S.; Uribe, J.A.G.; Saldivar, S.O.S. Comparative analyses of total phenols, antioxidant activity, and flavonol glycoside profile of cladode flours from different varieties of Opuntia spp. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2011, 59, 7054–7061. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Pastorelli, G.; Serra, V.; Vannuccini, C.; Attard, E. Opuntia spp. as alternative fodder for sustainable livestock production. Animals 2022, 12, 1597. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Sukri, S.A.M.; Andu, Y.; Sarijan, S.; Khalid, H.-N.M.; Kari, Z.A.; Harun, H.C.; Rusli, N.D.; Mat, K.; Khalif, R.I.A.R.; Wei, L.S.; et al. Pineapple waste in animal feed: A review of nutritional potential, impact and prospects. Ann. Anim. Sci. 2023, 23, 339–352. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Gusha, J.; Halimani, T.E.; Katsande, S.; Zvinorova, P.I. The effect of Opuntia ficus indica and forage legumes based diets on goat productivity in smallholder sector in Zimbabwe. Small Rumin. Res. 2015, 125, 21–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Hassan, S.; Louhaichi, M. Cactus Pear: A multipurpose crop and resilient feed source in dry environments. In Accelerated Breeding Initiative (ABI) Forage Germplasm Selection and Breeding; International Center for Agricultural Research in the Dry Areas: Rome, Italy, 2023; Available online: https://agris.fao.org/search/en/providers/123818/records/672376a7fca64b5c7aa3216d (accessed on 4 December 2025).
- Food and Agriculture Organization. Cactus (Opuntia spp.) as Forage; Mondragón-Jacobo, C., Pérez-González, S., Eds.; FAO: Rome, Italy, 2001. [Google Scholar]
- Louhaichi, M.; Atnafe Yigezu, Y.; Hassan, S.; Naorem, A.; Meta-Gonzales, R.; Kumar, S.; Hamdeni, I.; Palsaniya, D.R.; Kauthale, V.K.; Al-Mahasneh, A.M.; et al. Characterization of cactus pear (Opuntia ficus-indica) production systems and analysis of the adoption and economic viability of spineless cactus for animal feed in four continents. Cogent Food Agric. 2025, 31, 2550493. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Hu, J.; Li, J.; Pan, L.; Piao, X.; Sui, L.; Xie, G.; Zhang, S.; Zhang, L.; Wang, J. Rapid determination of the content of digestible energy and metabolizable energy in sorghum fed to growing pigs by near-infrared reflectance spectroscopy1. J. Anim. Sci. 2019, 97, 4855–4864. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Htet, M.N.S.; Feng, B.; Wang, H.; Tian, L.; Yadav, V. Comparative assessment of nutritional and functional properties of different sorghum genotypes for ensuring nutritional security in dryland agro-ecosystem. Front. Nutr. 2022, 9, 1048789. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Anitha, S.; Rajendran, A.; Botha, R.; Baruah, C.; Mer, P.; Sebastian, J.; Upadhyay, S.; Kane-Potaka, J. Variation in the nutrient content of different genotypes and varieties of millets, studied globally: A systematic review. Front. Sustain. Food Syst. 2024, 8, 1324046. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Tenakwa, E.A.; Ansah, T.; Cudjoe, S.; Yamasaki, S. Effects of Pearl millet (Pennisetum glaucum) forage cropping pattern on biomass yield and in vitro NDF digestibility. West Afr. J. Appl. Ecol. 2023, 31, 20–34. [Google Scholar]
- Backiyalakshmi, C.; Babu, C.; Naresh Reddy, D.; Padmakumar, V.; Prasad, K.V.S.V.; Azevedo, V.C.R.; Vetriventhan, M. Assessing Forage Potential of the Global Collection of Finger Millet (Eleusine coracana (L.) Gaertn.) Germplasm Conserved at the ICRISAT Genebank. Agronomy 2021, 11, 1706. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Dilebo, T. Nutritional composition of bulla from cultivated enset [Ensete ventricosum (Welw.) Cheesman] landraces in central Ethiopia. Discov. Food 2025, 5, 281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Nurfeta, A.; Eik, L.O.; Tolera, A.; Sundstøl, F. Chemical composition and in sacco dry matter degradability of different morphological fractions of 10 enset (Ensete ventricosum) varieties. Anim. Feed. Sci. Technol. 2008, 146, 55–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Nilusha, R.A.T.; Jayasinghe, J.M.J.K.; Perera, O.D.A.N.; Perera, P.I.P.; Jayasinghe, C.V.L. Proximate Composition, Physicochemical, Functional, and Antioxidant Properties of Flours from Selected Cassava (Manihot esculenta Crantz) Varieties. Int. J. Food Sci. 2021, 2021, 6064545. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Mnisi, C.M.; Oyeagu, C.E.; Akuru, E.A.; Ruzvidzo, O.; Lewu, F.B. Sorghum, millet and cassava as alternative dietary energy sources for sustainable quail production—A review. Front. Anim. Sci. 2023, 4, 1066388. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Santo, L.E.; Pereira, C.S.G.P.; Costa, A.S.G.; Almeida, A.; Barreira, J.C.M.; Oliveira, M.B.P.P.; Vinha, A.F. Compositional and Bioactive Differentiation of Opuntia spp. Fruit Varieties by PCA and LDA. Foods 2025, 14, 3170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Rocha Filho, R.R.; Santos, D.C.; Véras, A.S.C.; Siqueira, M.C.B.; Novaes, L.P.; Mora-Luna, R.; Monteiro, C.C.F.; Ferreira, M.A. Can spineless forage cactus be the queen of forage crops in dryland areas? J. Arid. Environ. 2021, 186, 104426. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Tangendjaja, B. Nutrient Content of Soybean meal from Different Origins Based on Near Infrared Reflectance Spectroscopy. Indones. J. Agric. Sci. 2020, 21, 39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Sulaiman Salamatu, A.; Kassum Afodia, L.; Sanusi Shamsudeen, N. Proximate analysis and mineral compositions of different cereal grain varieties available in Kano state, Nigeria. Int. J. Food Sci. Nutr. 2020, 5, 108–112. [Google Scholar]
- Kitaw, G.; Terefe, G.; Faji, M.; Mengistu, G.; Dejene, M.; Fekadu, D.; Kehaliu, A.; Walelegne, M.; Mekonnen, B. Effect of maize (Zea mays L.) genotypes, harvesting stages and ensiling periods on fermentation and nutritional value of silage. Grass Res. 2024, 4, e009. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Ran, T.; Fang, Y.; Wang, Y.T.; Yang, W.Z.; Niu, Y.D.; Sun, X.Z.; Zhong, R.Z. Effects of grain type and conditioning temperature during pelleting on growth performance, ruminal fermentation, meat quality and blood metabolites of fattening lambs. Animal 2021, 15, 100146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Khalifa, M.; Eltahir, E.A.B. Assessment of global sorghum production, tolerance, and climate risk. Front. Sustain. Food Syst. 2023, 7, 1184373. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Yusriani, Y.; Usrina, N.; Fitriawaty; Haiqal, M.; Hayanti, S.Y.; Qomariyah, N.; Bakar, B.A.; Idawanni; Nathania, N.M.; Sabri, M. Potential and utilization of sorghum in dry land as animal feed. IOP Conf. Ser. Earth Environ. Sci. 2024, 1297, 012023. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Liu, Y.; Zhou, Q.; Ji, C.; Mu, J.; Wang, Y.; Harrison, M.T.; Liu, K.; Zhao, Y.; Zhao, Q.; Zhang, J.; et al. Microbial fermentation in co-ensiling forage-grain ratoon rice and maize to improve feed quality and enhance the sustainability of rice-based production systems. Resour. Environ. Sustain. 2025, 20, 100205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Segú, H.; Jalševac, F.; Pinent, M.; Ardévol, A.; Terra, X.; Blay, M.T. Intestinal morphometric changes induced by a western-style diet in Wistar rats and GSPE counter-regulatory effect. Nutrients 2022, 14, 2608. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Hou, Z.; Yu, X.; Wu, D. Effects of different ratio of sweet sorghum silage to corn silage diets on serum metabolome of lactating dairy cows. Trop. Anim. Health Prod. 2025, 57, 229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Hassan, Z.M.; Sebola, N.A.; Mabelebele, M. The nutritional use of millet grain for food and feed: A review. Agric. Food Secur. 2021, 10, 16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Gowda, N.K.S.; Prasad, C.S. Macro- and micro-nutrient utilization and milk production in crossbred dairy cows fed finger millet (Eleucine coracana) and rice (Oryza sativa) straw as dry roughage source. Asian-Australasian J. Anim. Sci. 2005, 18, 48–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Girgiri, A.; Muhammad, M.; Kolo, U.M.; Mustapha, M.G.; Abubakar, M.A.; Kachalla, A.; Bukar, M. Evaluation of finger millet (Eleusine coracana L.) fodder production and utilization by dairy goats in a semi-arid environment of Nigeria. J. Arid. Agric. 2024, 25, 110–116. [Google Scholar]
- Sachin, S.S.; Sanjay, G.C.; Prabhu, T.M.; Umashankar, B.C.; Singh, K.C.; Siddalingamurthy, H.K.; Madhusudhan, H.S.; Gouri, M.D. Comparative evaluation of extruded complete feeds based on finger millet (Eleusine coracana) straw, areca (Areca catechu) sheath and maize (Zea mays) cob in Mandya lambs. Indian J. Anim. Res. 2023, 59, 438–444. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Mugula, J.K.; Nnko, S.A.M.; Narvhus, J.A.; Sørhaug, T. Microbiological and fermentation characteristics of togwa, a Tanzanian fermented food. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2003, 80, 187–199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Cisse, R.S.; Hamburg, J.D.; Freeman, M.E.; Davis, A.J. Using locally produced millet as a feed ingredient for poultry production in Sub-Saharan Africa. J. Appl. Poult. Res. 2017, 26, 9–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Kawu, Y.U.; Doma, M.; Abubakar, K.; Bello, M.; Muhammad, I.A. Performance and economics of production of broiler chickens fed dietary levels of gayamba pearl millet (Pennisetum glaucum L.) as replacement for red sorghum (Sorghum bicolor). Nig J. Anim. Sci. Technol. 2019, 2, 72–84. [Google Scholar]
- Oskey, M.A. Yield and Nutritional Composition of Conventional and BMR Pearl Millet Under Different Management Conditions. Master’s Thesis, Clemson University, Clemson, SC, USA, 2020. [Google Scholar]
- Sabo, M.N.; Duru, S.; Afolayan, S.B. Carcass characteristics of Japanese quails (Coturnix coturnix japonica) fed whole or ground pearl millet (Pennisetum glaucum) with or without enzyme supplementation. FUDMA J. Sci. 2020, 4, 539–544. [Google Scholar]
- Santos, J.W.; Cabral, L.d.S.; Zervoudakis, J.T.; de Souza, A.L.; de Abreu, J.G.; Reverditto, R.; Pereira, G.A.d.C. Finger millet grain levels in sheep diets: Intake and digestibility. Rev. Bras. Zootec. 2008, 37, 1884–1889. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Adegbeye, M.J.; Ravi Kanth Reddy, P.; Obaisi, A.I.; Elghandour, M.M.M.Y.; Oyebamiji, K.J.; Salem, A.Z.M.; Morakinyo-Fasipe, O.T.; Cipriano-Salazar, M.; Camacho-Díaz, L.M. Sustainable agriculture options for production, greenhouse gasses and pollution alleviation, and nutrient recycling in emerging and transitional nations—An overview. J. Clean. Prod. 2020, 242, 118319. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Tong, Y.; Wu, J.; Guo, W.; Yang, Z.; Wang, H.; Liu, H.; Gao, Y.; Sun, M.; Yue, C. The effect of combining millet and corn straw as source forage for beef cattle diets on ruminal degradability and fungal community. Animals 2023, 13, 548. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Berhanu, H.; Kiflie, Z.; Miranda, I.; Lourenço, A.; Ferreira, J.; Feleke, S.; Yimam, A.; Pereira, H. Characterization of crop residues from false banana /Ensete ventricosum/ in Ethiopia in view of a full-resource valorization. PLoS ONE 2018, 13, e0199422. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Fekade, A.N. Replacement Value of Ensete ventricosum Corm and Kocho for Maize in Broiler and Layer Ration. Doctoral Dissertation, Haramaya University, Harar, Ethiopia, 2018. [Google Scholar]
- OECD; FAO. OECD-FAO Agricultural Outlook 2025–2034; OECD: Paris, France; FAO: Rome, Italy, 2025. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Hang, N.T.B.; Doan, C.C. Improving nutrition facts of cassava and soybean residue through solid-state fermentation by Pleurotus ostreatus mycelium: A pathway to safety animal feed production. Fermentation 2025, 11, 271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Rashid, M.; Aboshady, H.M.; Soltan, Y.A.; Archimede, H.; Ghoneem, W.M.A. Phytochemical profile and in vitro evaluation of cassava (Manihot esculenta Crantz) foliage as ruminant feed with/without green banana flour. Sci. Rep. 2025, 15, 721. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Triani, H.; Yuniza, A.; Marlida, Y.; Husmaini, H.; Astuti, W.; Yanti, G. A novel bacterial approach to cassava waste fermentation: Reducing cyanide toxicity and improving quality to ensure livestock feed safety. Open Vet. J. 2025, 1, 1358–1369. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Ogbuewu, I.P.; Mbajiorgu, C.A. Meta-analysis of substitution value of maize with cassava (Manihot esculenta Cratnz) on growth performance of broiler chickens. Front. Vet. Sci. 2022, 9, 997128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Abang, F.B.P.; Anoh, K.U.; Izuki, E.D.; Nsa, E.E.; Ijoko, N. Productive performance and hematological indices of broiler chicks fed biodegraded cassava root. Online J. Anim. Feed. Res. 2023, 13, 274–278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Gunun, N.; Phimda, R.; Piamphon, N.; Kaewwongsa, W.; Puangbut, D.; Kaewpila, C.; Khota, W.; Cherdthong, A.; Gunun, P. Effect of replacing concentrates with cassava root-top silage on feed utilization, rumen fermentation, blood parameters and growth performance in beef cattle. Anim. Biosci. 2024, 37, 1751–1758. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Yang, Y.; Lei, F.; Zhang, Z.; Liu, L.; Li, Q.; Guo, A. Effects of cassava root meal on the growth performance, apparent nutrient digestibility, organ and intestinal indices, and slaughter performance of yellow-feathered broiler chickens. Trop. Anim. Health Prod. 2024, 56, 274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Gebremariam, T.; Melaku, S.; Yami, A. Effect of different levels of cactus (Opuntia ficus-indica) inclusion on feed intake, digestibility and body weight gain in tef (Eragrostis tef) straw-based feeding of sheep. Anim. Feed. Sci. Technol. 2006, 131, 43–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Dubeux, J.C.B.; dos Santos, M.V.F.; da Cunha, M.V.; dos Santos, D.C.; Souza, R.T.d.A.; de Mello, A.C.L.; de Souza, T.C. Cactus (Opuntia and Nopalea) nutritive value: A review. Anim. Feed. Sci. Technol. 2021, 275, 114890. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Tafere, G. Cactus pear, cladodes (Opuntia ficus-indica); as forage for livestock in arid and semi-arids of Ethiopia feeding under a changing climate—A review. Int. J. Integr. Sci. Innov. Technol. 2016, 5, 12–14. [Google Scholar]
- Tegegne, F.; Kijora, C.; Peters, K.J. Study on the optimal level of cactus pear (Opuntia ficus-indica) supplementation to sheep and its contribution as source of water. Small Rumin. Res. 2007, 72, 157–164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Salem, B.H.; Smith, T. Feeding strategies to increase small ruminant production in dry environments. Small Rumin. Res. 2008, 77, 174–194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Gebreegziabher, Z.; Tsegay, B. Efficacy of cactus pear (Opuntia ficus-indica) varieties as a source of food and feed in Endamehoni district, northern Ethiopia. Afr. J. Food Agric. Nutr. Dev. 2015, 15, 10406–10427. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Albuquerque, I.; Araújo, G.; Santos, F.; Carvalho, G.; Santos, E.; Nobre, I.; Bezerra, L.; Silva-Júnior, J.; Silva-Filho, E.; Oliveira, R. Performance, body water balance, ingestive behavior and blood metabolites in goats fed with cactus pear (Opuntia ficus-indica L. Miller) silage subjected to an intermittent water supply. Sustainability 2020, 12, 2881. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Badr, S.E.A.; Fattah, M.S.A.; Elsaid, A.S. Productive performance and meat quality of commercial Cobb chicken fed diets containing different levels of prickly pear fruits (Opuntia ficus indica) peel. Bull. Natl. Res. Cent. 2019, 43, 195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Shams, A. Combat degradation in rain fed areas by introducing new drought tolerant crops in Egypt. Int. J. Water Resour. Arid. Environ. 2011, 1, 318–325. [Google Scholar]
- Hawu, O.; Ravhuhali, K.E.; Mokoboki, H.K.; Lebopa, C.K.; Sipango, N. Sustainable Use of Legume Residues: Effect on Nutritive Value and Ensiling Characteristics of Maize Straw Silage. Sustainability 2022, 14, 6743. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Chequer, J.A.R.; Carlos, M.A.L.; Flores, C.F.A.; Briano, P.H.; Flores, C.A.M.; Llorente, F.M. Effects of cactus (Opuntia ficus-indica) mucilage on boar sperm cryosurvival. Anim. Reprod. 2025, 22, e20240004. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Moshidi, P.M.; Sindane, A.S.; Washaya, S.; Muya, M.C. The effects of supplementing prickly pear (Opuntia ficus-indica) powder on dairy calves’ health and growth performance. S. Afr. J. Anim. Sci. 2025, 55, 225–236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Junior, D.A.G.; Lima, G.A.R.; Chirinda, A.T.; Silva, T.V.B.S.; Saldanha, R.B.; Mendes, R.B.; Oliveira, G.R.S.; Alba, H.D.R.; de Araújo, M.L.G.M.L.; Pina, D.d.S.; et al. Inclusion of Gliricidia Hay in Total Mixed Rations Silage Made from Giant Cactus Forage. Agriculture 2025, 15, 813. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Rodrigues, R.; Lopes, R.; Santos, F.N.; Santos, E.M.; Perazzo, A.; Zanine, A.; Silva, R.; Silva, E.; Olivera-Viciedo, D.; Rocha, M.; et al. Total Mixed Ration Silages Based on Forage Cactus and Xerophile Legumes as Alternatives for Ruminants. Agriculture 2023, 13, 1759. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Pereira, D.M.; de Oliveira, J.S.; Ramos, J.P.d.F.; Cavalcante, I.T.R.; Santos, F.N.d.S.; da Silva, E.d.S.; Perazzo, A.F.; Macêdo, A.J.d.S.; Tôrres Júnior, P.d.C.; Santos, E.M. Total mixed ration silage based on cactus pear and cottonseed cake in the feeding of feedlot finished lambs. Trop. Anim. Health Prod. 2025, 57, 50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- de Oliveira, P.V.C.; campos de Araújo, T.L.A.; Pinedo, L.A.; de Lima Junior, D.M.; Cortes, L.C.D.S.L.; Firmino, S.S.; Pereira, M.W.F.; de Oliveira Lima, P. Silagem mista de sorgo e palma forrageira: Composição, digestibilidade, fermentação e perdas. Semin. Cienc. Agrar. 2023, 44, 929–936. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Habte, E.; Teshome, A.; Muktar, M.S.; Assefa, Y.; Negawo, A.T.; Machado, J.C.; Ledo, F.J.d.S.; Jones, C.S. Productivity and Feed Quality Performance of Napier Grass (Cenchrus purpureus) Genotypes Growing under Different Soil Moisture Levels. Plants 2022, 11, 2549. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Maña, M.A.T.; Niepes, R.A.; Abela, J.V. Feed intake and growth performance of sheep (Ovis aries L.) fed with Napier (Pennisetum purpureum Sch.) silage added with varying levels of L. plantarum as inoculant. Livest. Res. Rural Dev. 2023, 35, e50. [Google Scholar]
- Sonkar, N.; Singh, N.; Santra, A.; Mishra, S.; Verma, L.P.; Soni, A. Application of munga (Moringa oleifera) in livestock feed: A review. Int. J. Chem. Stud. 2020, 8, 1729–1735. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Su, B.; Chen, X. Current Status and Potential of Moringa oleifera Leaf as an Alternative Protein Source for Animal Feeds. Front. Vet. Sci. 2020, 7, 53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Mashiloane, T.; Mlambo, V.; Mhlongo, G.; Dibakoane, S.R.; Mnisi, C.M. Cowpeas vs. soybeans: Can valorization bridge the nutritional gap for sustainable animal feeding systems in the Global South? Front. Sustain. Food Syst. 2025, 9, 1657018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Hintsa, K.; Berhe, A.; Balehegn, M.; Berhe, K. Effect of replacing concentrate feed with leaves of Oldman saltbush (Atriplex nummularia) on feed intake, weight gain, and carcass parameters of highland sheep fed on wheat straw in northern Ethiopia. Trop. Anim. Health Prod. 2018, 50, 1435–1440. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Norman, H.C.; Wilmot, M.G.; Thomas, D.T.; Barrett-Lennard, E.G. Sheep production, plant growth and nutritive value of a saltbush-based pasture system subject to rotational grazing or set stocking. Small Rumin. Res. 2010, 91, 103–109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Santos, R.; Carvalho, M.; Rosa, E.; Carnide, V.; Castro, I. Root and Agro-Morphological Traits Performance in Cowpea under Drought Stress. Agronomy 2020, 10, 1604. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Tzanova, M.T.; Stoilova, T.D.; Todorova, M.H.; Memdueva, N.Y.; Gerdzhikova, M.A.; Grozeva, N.H. Antioxidant Potentials of Different Genotypes of Cowpea (Vigna unguiculata L. Walp.) Cultivated in Bulgaria, Southern Europe. Agronomy 2023, 13, 1684. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Abdou, S. Evaluation of cowpea [Vigna unguiculata (L) Walp.] lines for high grain and fodder yields in the dry season of Niger republic. Heliyon 2022, 8, e09147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Ciurescu, G.; Vasilachi, A.; Ropotă, M. Effect of dietary cowpea (Vigna unguiculata [L] walp) and chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) seeds on growth performance, blood parameters and breast meat fatty acids in broiler chickens. Ital. J. Anim. Sci. 2022, 21, 97–105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Sossou, A.P.G.; Aldian, D.; Tian, K.; Yayota, M. Nutrient Utilization, Ruminal Fermentation, and Health Responses of Maintenance Goats to Cowpea (Vigna unguiculata var. sesquipedalis) Silage as a Sustainable Alternative to Commercial Feed. Anim. Sci. J. 2025, 96, e70094. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Salem, B.H.; Norman, H.C.; Nefzaoui, A.; Mayberry, D.E.; Pearce, K.L.; Revell, D.K. Potential use of oldman saltbush (Atriplex nummularia Lindl.) in sheep and goat feeding. Small Rumin. Res. 2010, 91, 13–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Shawket, S.; El Shaer, H.; Ahmed, M. Nutritional performance of dry she-camels fed Atriplex halimus (Saltbush) for prolonged-period. Egypt. J. Camel Sci. 2023, 1, 83–90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Shawket, S.; El Shaer, H.; Ahmed, M.; Ibrahem, A.H. Influence of prolonged feeding Atriplex halimus (Saltbush) on pregnant camels production and there calves performance. Egypt. J. Camel Sci. 2024, 2, 29–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Rabee, A.E.; Aman, A.A.; Askar, A.R. Animal performance, rumen microbiota, and fermentation in growing camel calves fed alfalfa hay, Atriplex, or their mixture. BMC Vet. Res. 2025, 21, 670. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Beretta, V.; Simeone, A.; Franco, J.; Bentancur, O.; Novac, M.; Panizza, V.; Rodríguez, M.V. Using sorghum dry distillers’ grains plus solubles in sorghum-based finishing diets: Feed utilization, cattle performance and carcass traits. Anim. Feed. Sci. Technol. 2021, 271, 114731. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Wahyono, T.; Indiratama, W.M.; Sihono; Human, S. White Midrib (WMR) vs Brown Midrib (BMR) sorghum: Perspective of nutrient value for ruminant forage. IOP Conf. Ser. Earth Environ. Sci. 2021, 788, 012164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Ndlovu, N.; Usai, T.; Usai, E.; Manhokwe, S. Effect of dietary substitution of maize meal with finger millet meal on fat deposition on broiler meat. Afr. J. Biol. Sci. 2019, 01, 15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Chen, X.; Mi, H.; Cui, K.; Zhou, R.; Tian, S.; Zhang, L. Effects of diets containing finger millet straw and corn straw on growth performance, plasma metabolites, immune capacity, and carcass traits in fattening lambs. Animals 2020, 10, 1285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Adeleye, O.O.; Ogunwole, O.A.; Olumide, M.D.; Ojediran, T.T. Whole pearl millet feeding does not impair performance and nutrient digestibility in 28-day-old broiler chickens. J. Anim. Physiol. Anim. Nutr. 2020, 104, 517–528. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Bot, M.H.; Bawa, G.S.; Omage, J.J.; Onimisi, P.A.; Kpanja, E. Growth performance of broiler chickens fed replacement levels of red and black finger millet (Eleusine coracana) varieties at starter phase. Nig. J. Anim. Sci. 2021, 23, 122–130. [Google Scholar]
- Olasehinde, O.; Aderemi, F. Effect of sprouted whole pearl millet on growth performance, intestinal development, bacterial count, and blood indices of broiler chickens. Transl. Anim. Sci. 2023, 7, txad045. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Singh, H.; Malik, D.S.; Kaur, D.; Singh, Y.; Chahal, U. Influence of pearl-millet-based extruded feed on the growth performance and carcass characteristics of broiler. Indian J. Poult. Sci. 2023, 58, 87–88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Zheng, Y.; Zhao, Y.; Xue, S.; Wang, W.; Wang, Y.; Cao, Z.; Yang, H.; Li, S. Feeding value assessment of substituting cassava (Manihot esculenta) residue for concentrate of dairy cows using an in vitro gas test. Animals 2021, 11, 307. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Williams, G.A.; Akinola, O.S.; Adeleye, T.M.; Irekhore, O.T.; Lala, A.O.; Oso, A.O. Processed cassava peel–leaf blends: Effect on performance, carcass yield, organ weights and ileal microflora of growing pigs. Anim. Prod. Sci. 2023, 63, 751–760. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Ojediran, T.K.; Afolabi, T.S.; Olayiwola, S.F.; Oyetoro, B.A.; Olayeni, T.B.; Emiola, I.A. High-quality-cassava peel meal: Impact on growth performance, blood characteristics, and economic indices of grower pigs. Thai J. Agric. Sci. 2024, 57, 58–71. [Google Scholar]
- Pongsub, S.; Suriyapha, C.; Boontiam, W.; Cherdthong, A. Growth performance and ruminal fermentation characteristics of Thai-native beef cattle fed cassava pulp fermented with Lactobacillus casei TH14 and additives. Trop. Anim. Health Prod. 2024, 56, 356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Kandee, T.; Chanthakhoun, V.; Polyorach, S. Effects of cassava leaves silage as a protein source in dietary on growth and reproductive performance of Lao native pig gilts. Int. J. Agric. Technol. 2024, 20, 1075–1082. [Google Scholar]
- Triani, H.D.; Yuniza, A.; Marlida, Y.; Husmaini, H.; Astuti, W.D.; Yanti, G. Potential of fermented cassava peel and leaves as maize substitutes in diets to improve the performance and meat quality of Kamang ducks. J. Anim. Feed Sci. 2025, 34, 415–421. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Subramanian, A.; Ramakrishnaiah, A.; Reddy, M.; Mantaraghatta, P.; Gloridoss, G.; Narasaiah, N.; Singh, C. Effect of feeding spineless cactus (Opuntia ficus indica) on intake, digestibility and growth performance in lambs. Int. J. Livest. Res. 2017, 7, 101–110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Alhanafi, F.; Kaysi, Y.; Muna, M.; Alkhtib, A.; Wamatu, J.; Burton, E. Spineless cactus (Opuntia ficus-indica) and saltbush (Atriplex halimus L.) as feed supplements for fattening Awassi male lambs: Effect on digestibility, water consumption, blood metabolites, and growth performance. Trop. Anim. Health Prod. 2019, 51, 1637–1644. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Moula, N.; Humbel, M.; Leterrier, M.; Lempereur, L.; Ait-Kaki, A.; Touazi, L.; Saidj, D.; Hornick, J.L. Effects of Opuntia ficus-indica on growth performance and serum parameters of broiler chicken in Algeria. Tropicultura 2019, 37, 263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ordaz, G.; Juárez, A.; López, M.; Martínez, H.E.; Pérez, R.E.; Ortiz, R. Opuntia ficus-indica as a supplement for gilts in late gestation and lactation: Effects on biochemical parameters and voluntary feed intake. J. Appl. Anim. Res. 2021, 49, 404–412. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Nyambali, A.; Mndela, M.; Tjelele, T.; Mapiye, C.; Strydom, P.; Raffrenato, E.; Dzama, K.; Muchenje, V.; Mkhize, N. Growth performance, carcass characteristics and economic viability of nguni cattle fed diets containing graded levels of Opuntia ficus-indica. Agriculture 2022, 12, 1023. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Sang, W.-G.; Kim, J.-H.; Baek, J.-K.; Kwon, D.; Ban, H.-Y.; Cho, J.-I.; Seo, M.-C. Detection of Drought Stress in Soybean Plants using RGB-based Vegetation Indices. Korean J. Agric. For. Meteorol. 2021, 23, 340–348. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhuang, S.; Wang, P.; Jiang, B.; Li, M. Learned features of leaf phenotype to monitor maize water status in the fields. Comput. Electron. Agric. 2020, 172, 105347. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Azimi, S.; Gandhi, T.K. Water Stress Identification in Chickpea Images using Machine Learning. In Proceedings of the 2020 IEEE 8th R10 Humanitarian Technology Conference (R10-HTC); Kuching, Malaysia, 1–3 December 2020, IEEE: New York, NY, USA, 2020; pp. 1–6. [Google Scholar]
- Fares, A.; Veettil, A.V.; Rahman, A.; Awal, R. A review of artificial intelligence applications for predicting crop performance and enhancing food security under drought-induced water stress. Agric. Water Manag. 2026, 325, 110212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Elghandour, M.M.; Rodríguez-Ocampo, I.; Parra-Garcia, A.; Salem, A.Z.; Greiner, R.; Márquez-Molina, O.; Barros-Rodríguez, M.; Barbabosa-Pilego, A. Biogas production from prickly pear cactus containing diets supplemented with Moringa oleifera leaf extract for a cleaner environmental livestock production. J. Clean. Prod. 2018, 185, 547–553. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- De León-González, F.; Fuentes-Ponce, M.H.; Bautista-Cruz, A.; Leyva-Pablo, T.; Castillo-Juárez, H.; Rodríguez-Sánchez, L.M. Cactus crop as an option to reduce soil C–CO2 emissions in soils with declining fertility. Agron. Sustain. Dev. 2018, 38, 8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Molina-Botero, I.C.; Gaviria-Uribe, X.; Rios-Betancur, J.P.; Medina-Campuzano, M.; Toro-Trujillo, M.; González-Quintero, R.; Ospina, B.; Arango, J. Methane emission, carbon footprint and productivity of specialized dairy cows supplemented with bitter cassava (Manihot Esculenta Crantz). Animals 2023, 14, 19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Mohammadi, A.; Rafiee, S.; Jafari, A.; Keyhani, A.; Mousavi-Avval, S.H.; Nonhebel, S. Energy use efficiency and greenhouse gas emissions of farming systems in north Iran. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2014, 30, 724–733. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Moungsree, S.; Neamhom, T.; Polprasert, S.; Suwannahong, K.; Polprasert, C.; Patthanaissaranukool, W. greenhouse gas emissions and carbon footprint of maize-based feed products for animal farming in Thailand. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2023, 31, 2657–2670. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Zegbe, J.A.; Servín-Palestina, M. Supplemental irrigation to save water while growing cactus pear in semi-arid regions. Irrig. Drain. 2021, 70, 269–280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Meaza, H.; Demissie, B.; Berhe, Y.K.; Gebrehiwot, M.; Nyssen, J.; Haile, M.; Gebreegzabher, A.; Girmay, A. Understanding cactus pear status for improved ecosystem services in northern Ethiopia. Disc. Environ. 2024, 2, 78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Huang, Z.; Dunkerley, D.; López-Vicente, M.; Wu, G.-L. Trade-offs of dryland forage production and soil water consumption in a semi-arid area. Agric. Water Manag. 2020, 241, 106349. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Ahmed, U.; Iqbal, W.; Amin, H.; Noor, E.; Jamal, A.; Saeed, M.F.; Černý, J. Comparative performance of summer cereals under limited water and fertilizer inputs. Disc. Agric. 2025, 3, 116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Bhattarai, B.; Singh, S.; West, C.P.; Saini, R. Forage Potential of Pearl Millet and Forage Sorghum Alternatives to Corn under the Water-Limiting Conditions of the Texas High Plains: A Review. Crop. Forage Turfgrass. Manag. 2019, 5, 190058. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Bhattarai, B.; Singh, S.; West, C.P.; Ritchie, G.L.; Trostle, C.L. Effect of deficit irrigation on physiology and forage yield of forage sorghum, pearl millet, and corn. Crop Sci. 2020, 60, 2167–2179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Balduíno da Silva, K.; Silva de Oliveira, J.; Mauro Santos, E.; de Farias Ramos, J.P.; Queiroga Cartaxo, F.; Naves Givisiez, P.E.; Fernandes do Nascimento Souza, A.; Ferreira de Lima Cruz, G.; César Neto, J.M.; Pereira Alves, J.; et al. Cactus pear as roughage source feeding confined lambs: Performance, carcass characteristics, and economic analysis. Agronomy 2021, 11, 625. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- da Silva, J.B.; Santos Júnior, E.P.; Pedrosa, J.G.T.; Sales, A.T.; Sampaio, E.V.d.S.B.; Menezes, R.S.C.; Dutra, E.D.; Junior, P.R. Energetic and economic analysis of spineless cactus biomass production in the Brazilian semi-arid region. Energies. 2022, 15, 5270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Balaji, G.A.; Geethalakshmi, V.; Senthil, A.; Prahadeeswaran, M.; Iswarya, S.; Rajavel, M.; Bhuvaneswari, K.; Natarajan, B.; Senthilraja, K.; Gowtham, R.; et al. Assessment of economic efficiency and its determents for mixed crop livestock production under dryland agriculture system in the western zone of Tamil Nadu, India. Sustainability 2023, 15, 8332. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- da Silva, J.B.; Santos Júnior, E.P.; Siqueira e Silva, S.M.; Maciel, V.G.; Sales, A.T.; Sampaio, E.V.d.S.B.; Rotela Junior, P.; Coelho Junior, L.M.; Dubeux, J.C.B., Jr.; Menezes, R.S.C.; et al. Economic and energetic analysis of cactus pear biomass production systems with increasing levels of technological intensity. Ind. Crops Prod. 2024, 208, 117883. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Miron, J.; Zuckerman, E.; Sadeh, D.; Adin, G.; Nikbachat, M.; Yosef, E.; Ben-Ghedalia, D.; Carmi, A.; Kipnis, T.; Solomon, R. Yield, composition and in vitro digestibility of new forage sorghum varieties and their ensilage characteristics. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 2005, 120, 17–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Rana, A.S.; Ahmad, A.-H.; Saleem, N.; Nawaz, A.; Hussian, T.; Saad, M. Differential response of sorghum cultivar for fodder yield and quality. J. Glob. Innov. Agric. Sci. 2014, 2, 6–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Bean, B.W.; Baumhardt, R.L.; McCollum, F.T.; McCuistion, K.C. Comparison of Sorghum Classes for Grain and Forage Yield and Forage Nutritive Value. Field Crops Res. 2013, 142, 20–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Pinho, R.M.A.; Santos, E.M.; de Oliveira, J.S.; Bezerra, H.F.C.; de Freitas, P.M.D.; Perazzo, A.F.; Ramos, R.C.d.S.; da Silva, A.P.G. sorghum cultivars of different purposes silage. Ciênc Rural 2015, 45, 298–303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Behling Neto, A.; dos Reis, R.H.P.; Cabral, L.d.S.; de Abreu, J.G.; Sousa, D.d.P.; de Sousa, F.G. nutritional value of sorghum silage of different purposes. Ciênc Agrotecnologia 2017, 41, 288–299. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Sajimin, S.; Purwantari, N.D.; Sarjiman, S. Evaluation on performance of some Sorghum bicolor cultivars as forage resources in the dry land with dry climate. J. Ilmu Ternak Vet. 2018, 22, 135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Kapustin, S.; Volodin, A.; Kapustin, A.; Samokısh, N. Feed quality of new sudan grass varieties. J. Agric. Nat. 2022, 25, 400–405. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Silva, R.C.; Ferreira, M.A.; Oliveira, J.C.V.; Santos, D.C.; Gama, M.A.S.; Chagas, J.C.C.; Inácio, J.G.; Silva, E.T.S.; Pereira, L.G.R. Orelha de Elefante Mexicana Opuntia Stricta ([Haw.] Haw.) spineless cactus as an option in crossbred dairy cattle diet. S. Afr. J. Anim. Sci. 2018, 48, 516. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Pessoa, D.V.; Pereira de Andrade, A.; Rodrigues Magalhães, A.L.; Teodoro, A.L.; Cordeiro dos Santos, D.; Leal de Araújo, G.G.; Nunes de Medeiros, A.; Bezerra do Nascimento, D.; de Lima Valença, R.; Cardoso, D.B. Forage nutritional differences within the genus Opuntia. J. Arid Environ. 2020, 181, 104243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Ramos, O.A.; Ferreirade, A.M.; Véras, A.S.C.; Costa, S.B.M.; Conceição, M.G.; Sliva, E.C.; Salla, L.E.; Souza, A.R.D.L. Different fiber sources in diets based on spineless cactus in sheep feeding. Rev. Bras. Saúde Prod. Anim. 2013, 14, 648–659. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Ramos, J.P.d.F.; Macêdo, A.J.d.S.; Santos, E.M.; Edvan, R.L.; de Sousa, W.H.; Perazzo, A.F.; Silva, A.S.; Cartaxo, F.Q. Forage yield and morphological traits of cactus pear genotypes. Acta Sci. Agron. 2021, 43, e51214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Teklu, G.W.; Ayimut, K.M.; Abera, F.A.; GEgziabher, Y.; Fitiwi, I. Nutritive and chemical composition and in vitro digestibility of cladodes of the Opuntia species. Sustainability 2023, 15, 6624. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- National Research Council. Nutrient Requirements of Dairy Cattle: 2001; National Academies Press: Washington, DC, USA, 2001. [Google Scholar]
- Alves, F.A.L.; dos Santos, D.C. Morphological and nutritional characterization of the cladodes of seven varieties of forage cactus of the genus Opuntia cultivated in Brazil. S. Afr. J. Bot. 2024, 169, 46–55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Manopriya, S.; Aberathna, A.A.A.U.; Satharasinghe, D.A.; Jayasooriya, L.J.P.A.P.; Mantilaka, M.M.M.G.P.G.; Fernando, C.A.N.; Jayaweera, B.P.A.; Weerathilake, W.A.D.V.; Prathapasinghe, G.A.; Liyanage, J.A.; et al. Importance of Phosphorus in Farm Animals. Iran. J. Appl. Anim. Sci. 2022, 12, 203–210. [Google Scholar]
- Dambreville, A.; Lauri, P.-É.; Normand, F.; Guédon, Y. Analysing growth and development of plants jointly using developmental growth stages. Ann. Bot. 2015, 115, 93–105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Mahmood, T.; Anwar, F.; Abbas, M.; Boyce, M.C.; Saari, N. Compositional Variation in Sugars and Organic Acids at Different Maturity Stages in Selected Small Fruits from Pakistan. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2012, 13, 1380–1392. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Atis, I.; Konuskan, O.; Duru, M.; Gozubenli, H.; Yilmaz, S. Effect of harvesting time on yield, composition and forage quality of some forage sorghum cultivars. Int. J. Agric. Biol. 2012, 14, 879–886. [Google Scholar]
- Júnior, F.W.G.; Gonçalves, L.C.; Júnior, R.W.T.V.; Carvalho, W.T.; Maurício, R.M.; Rodrigues, J.A.; Faria, W.G.; Saliba, E.O.; Rodriguez, N.M.; Borges, A.L. Effect of grain maturity stage on the quality of sorghum BRS-610 silages. Arq. Bras. Med. Vet. Zootec. 2011, 63, 1215–1223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Mwangi, P. Effect of Stage of Growth on Nutritional Value of Dual Purpose Sorghum. Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Nairobi, Nairobi, Kenya, 2016. [Google Scholar]
- Terler, G.; Resch, R.; Gappmaier, S.; Gruber, L. Nutritive value for ruminants of different fresh and ensiled sorghum ( Sorghum Bicolor (L.) Moench) varieties harvested at varying maturity stages. Arch. Anim. Nutr. 2021, 75, 167–182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- da Silva, C.S.; TMaia, F.J.; Lourenço, J.M.; Bass, M.L.; Seidel, D.S.; Callaway, T.R.; Hancock, D.W.; Stewart, R.L. The impact of maturity stages on yield, quality, and nutritive value of ensiled johnsongrass [Sorghum Halepense (L.) Pers]. Transl. Anim. Sci. 2022, 6, txac118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Alatürk, F. Effects of harvest height and time on hay yield and quality of some sweet sorghum and sorghum Sudangrass hybrid varieties. PeerJ 2024, 12, e17274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Hakim, A.; Fazriyah, N.R.; Rayani, T.F.; Sembada, P.; Sulassih, S. The effect of different harvest ages on the productivity of maize and sorghum green fodder. E3S Web. Conf. 2024, 577, 02009. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Moura, M.M.A.; Roseira, J.P.S.; Alves, W.S.; Neto, O.d.S.P.; Mizobutsi, E.H.; Pires, D.A.d.A.; Costa, R.F.; Carvalho, C.d.C.S.; Sousa, I.P.S.; Fernandes, M.B.; et al. Effect of maturity stage on sorghum silage production: Intake, digestibility, energy partition, and methane production in sheep. Res. Sq. 2024; ahead of print. [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Al Juhaimi, F.; Ghafoor, K.; Uslu, N.; Ahmed, I.A.M.; Babiker, E.E.; Özcan, M.M.; Fadimu, G.J. The effect of harvest times on bioactive properties and fatty acid compositions of prickly pear (Opuntia ficus-barbarica A. Berger) fruits. Food Chem. 2020, 303, 125387. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Da Silva, D.D.; De Andrade, A.P.; Da Silva, D.S.; Alves, F.A.L.; Valença, R.D.L.; Dos Santos, D.C.; De Medeiros, A.N.; Araújo, F.D.S.; Lima, L.K.S.; Alcantara Bruno, R.D.L. Nutritional Quality of Opuntia Ssp. at different phenological stages: Implications for forage purposes. J. Agric. Stud. 2021, 10, 48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Maiuolo, J.; Nucera, S.; Serra, M.; Caminiti, R.; Oppedisano, F.; Macrì, R.; Scarano, F.; Ragusa, S.; Muscoli, C.; Palma, E.; et al. Cladodes of Opuntia Ficus-Indica (L.) Mill. possess important beneficial properties dependent on their different stages of maturity. Plants 2024, 13, 1365. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Fulgueira, C.L.; Amigot, S.L.; Gaggiotti, M.L.; Romero, L.A.; Basílico, J.C. Forage quality: Techniques for testing. Fresh Prod. 2007, 1, 121–131. [Google Scholar]
- Ahmad, M.S.; Siddiqui, M.W. Factors affecting postharvest quality of fresh fruits. In Postharvest Quality Assurance of Fruits: Practical Approaches for Developing Countries; Springer: Cham, Switzerlad, 2015; pp. 7–32. [Google Scholar]
- Salem, A.Z.M.; Hassan, A.A.; Khalil, M.S.; Gado, H.M.; Alsersy, H.; Simbaya, J. Effects of sun-drying and exogenous enzymes on nutrients intake, digestibility and nitrogen utilization in sheep fed Atriplex Halimus foliages. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 2012, 171, 128–135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Lahiru, P.B.; Jayaweera, B.P.A. Alternative roughage feed production under different drying methods and evaluation of the feeding value. Wayamba J. Anim. Sci. 2017, 9, 1405. [Google Scholar]
- Suwignyo, B.; Mustika, A.; Kustantinah; Yusiati, L.M.; Suhartanto, B. Effect of drying method on physical-chemical characteristics and amino acid content of tropical alfalfa (Medicago Sativa L.) hay for poultry feed. Am. J. Anim. Vet. Sci. 2020, 15, 118–122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Soto, G.M.; Fabián, F.C.; Pérez, T.H.; López, O.P. Effect of drying methods on the nutraceutical potential of cactus cladodes (Opuntia spp.). Int. J. Food Sci. Nutr. 2016, 2, 1–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Ferreira, R.M.; Wessel, D.F.; Silva, A.M.S.; Saraiva, J.A.; Cardoso, S.M. Infusion from Opuntia ficus-indica peels: The effects of drying and steeping conditions. Beverages 2023, 9, 97. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Abidi, S.; Ben Salem, H.; Vasta, V.; Priolo, A. Supplementation with barley or spineless cactus (Opuntia ficus indica f. inermis) cladodes on digestion, growth and intramuscular fatty acid composition in sheep and goats receiving oaten hay. Small Rumin. Res. 2009, 87, 9–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Aruwa, C.E.; Amoo, S.; Kudanga, T. Phenolic compound profile and biological activities of Southern African Opuntia ficus-indica fruit pulp and peels. LWT—Food Sci. Technol. 2019, 111, 337–344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Gouws, C.A.; D’Cunha, N.M.; Georgousopoulou, E.N.; Mellor, D.D.; Naumovski, N. The effect of different drying techniques on phytochemical content and in vitro antioxidant properties of Australian-grown prickly pears (Opuntia ficus indica). J. Food Process. Preserv. 2019, 43, e13900. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- El Hajji, L.; Azzouzi, H.; Achchoub, M.; Elfazazi, K.; Salmaoui, S. Nutritional improvement of cactus fruit scraps with addition of alfalfa or Atriplex halimus, and comparison of two animal feed preservation methods (silage and solar drying). Afr. J. Range Forage Sci. 2024, 41, 196–203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Maniaci, G.; Ponte, M.; Giosuè, C.; Gannuscio, R.; Pipi, M.; Gaglio, R.; Busetta, G.; Di Grigoli, A.; Bonanno, A.; Alabiso, M. Cladodes of Opuntia ficus-indica (L.) as a source of bioactive compounds in dairy products. J. Dairy Sci. 2024, 107, 1887–1902. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Zhang, Y.; Chen, F.; Zhang, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Du, X. Experimental investigations of interactions between a laser-induced cavitation bubble and a spherical particle. Exp. Therm. Fluid. Sci. 2018, 98, 645–661. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Iskenderov, R.; Lebedev, A.; Zacharin, A.; Lebedev, P. Evaluating effectiveness of grinding process grain materials. Eng. Rural Dev. 2018, 17, 102–108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Kiarie, E.G.; Mills, A. Role of feed processing on gut Health and function in pigs and poultry: Conundrum of optimal particle size and hydrothermal regimens. Front. Vet. Sci. 2019, 6, 19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Liermann, W.; Bochnia, M.; Berk, A.; Böschen, V.; Hüther, L.; Zeyner, A.; Dänicke, S. Effects of Feed Particle Size and Hydro-Thermal Processing Methods on Starch Modification, Nutrient Digestibility and the Performance and the Gastrointestinal Tract of Broilers. Animals 2019, 9, 294. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Chen, T.; Chen, D.; Tian, G.; Zheng, P.; Mao, X.; Yu, J.; He, J.; Huang, Z.; Luo, Y.; Luo, J.; et al. Effects of soluble and insoluble dietary fiber supplementation on growth performance, nutrient digestibility, intestinal microbe and barrier function in weaning piglet. Anim. Feed. Sci. Technol. 2020, 260, 114335. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Lyu, F.; Thomas, M.; van der Poel, A.F.B.; Hendriks, W.H. The importance of particle size on organic matter and crude protein in vitro digestibility of maize and soybean meal. Anim. Feed. Sci. Technol. 2022, 285, 115243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Iskakov, R.; Gulyarenko, A.; Hyla, P.; Bembenek, M. Working parts for intensive crushing and grinding of feed from waste raw materials: A review. Adv. Sci. Technol. Res. J. 2025, 19, 98–131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Healy, B.J.; Hancock, J.D.; Kennedy, G.A.; Bramel-Cox, P.J.; Behnke, K.C.; Hines, R.H. Optimum particle size of corn and hard and soft sorghum for nursery pigs. J. Anim. Sci. 1994, 72, 2227–2236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Morel, P.C.H.; Cottam, Y.H. Effects of Particle Size of Barley on Intestinal Morphology, Growth Performance and Nutrient Digestibility in Pigs. Asian-Australas. J. Anim. Sci. 2007, 20, 1738–1745. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Paulk, C.B.; Hancock, J.D.; Fahrenholz, A.C.; Wilson, J.M.; Mckinny, L.J.; Behnke, K.C. Effects of sorghum particle size on milling characteristics and growth performance in finishing pigs. Anim. Feed. Sci. Technol. 2015, 202, 75–80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Silva, M.; ACXG, C.; Litz, F.; Fagundes, N.; Fernandes, E.d.A.; Mendonça, G. Effects of sorghum on broilers gastrointestinal tract. Rev. Bras. Cienc. Avic. 2015, 17, 95–102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Iskakov, R.; Gulyarenko, A.; Bembenek, M.; Kassym, R. Technologies for efficient grinding of plant and animal waste: A review. EUREKA Phys. Eng. 2025, 2, 54–77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Romero, C.; Nicodemus, N.; Carabaño, R.; García, J. Evaluation of type of grinding of lucerne hay and wheat straw in diets for growing rabbits with two levels of neutral detergent fibre. Anim. Feed. Sci. Technol. 2025, 319, 116193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Huang, X.; Dou, J.; Li, D.; Wang, L. Effects of superfine grinding on properties of sugar beet pulp powders. LWT 2018, 87, 203–209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Savinyh, P.; Shirobokov, V.; Fedorov, O.; Ivanovs, S. Influence of rotary grain crusher parameters on quality of finished product. Eng. Rural Dev. 2018, 17, 131–136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Ray, R.C.; Bari, L.M.; Isobe, S. Agro-industrial bioprocessing of tropical root and tuber crops—Current research and future prospects. In Industrial Exploitation of Microorganisms; I. K. International Pvt Ltd.: New Delhi, India, 2010; pp. 352–374. [Google Scholar]
- Ramos, J.P.F.; Santos, E.M.; Santos, A.P.M.; de Souza, W.H.; Oliveira, J.S. Ensiling of forage crops in semiarid regions. In Advances in Silage Production and Utilization; Da Silva, T., Santos, E.M., Eds.; Intech Open: Rijeka, Croatia, 2016; pp. 67–83. [Google Scholar]
- Ávila, C.L.S.; Carvalho, B.F. Silage fermentation—Updates focusing on the performance of micro-organisms. J. Appl. Microbiol. 2020, 128, 966–984. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Lima, R.; Lourenço, M.; Díaz, R.F.; Castro, A.; Fievez, V. Effect of combined ensiling of sorghum and soybean with or without molasses and lactobacilli on silage quality and in vitro rumen fermentation. Anim. Feed. Sci. Technol. 2010, 155, 122–131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Naeini, S.Z.; Emami, N.K.; Rowghani, E.; Bayat, A. Influence of ensiling time on chemical composition, fermentation characteristics, gas production and protein fractions of sweet sorghum silage. Res. Opin. Anim. Vet. Sci. 2014, 4, 286–293. [Google Scholar]
- Bao, J.; Wang, L.; Yu, Z. Effects of Different Moisture Levels and Additives on the Ensiling Characteristics and In Vitro Digestibility of Stylosanthes Silage. Animals 2022, 12, 1555. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Lin, J.; Li, G.; Sun, L.; Wang, S.; Meng, X.; Sun, L.; Yuan, L.; Xu, L. Varieties and ensiling: Impact on chemical composition, fermentation quality and bacterial community of alfalfa. Front. Microbiol. 2023, 13, 1091491. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Forwood, D.L.; Hooker, K.; Caro, E.; Huo, Y.; Holman, D.B.; Meale, S.J.; Chaves, A.V. Crop sorghum ensiled with unsalable vegetables increases silage microbial diversity. Front. Microbiol. 2019, 10, 2599. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Ziv, C.; Fallik, E. Postharvest storage techniques and quality evaluation of fruits and vegetables for reducing food loss. Agronomy 2021, 11, 1133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Valenzuela, J.L. Advances in postharvest preservation and quality of fruits and vegetables. Foods 2023, 12, 1830. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Wallace, P.A.; Adu, E.K.; Rhule, S.W.A. Optimal storage conditions for cocoa cake with shell, palm kernel cake and copra cake as poultry and livestock feed in Ghana. Livest. Res. Rural Dev. 2010, 22, 32. Available online: https://lrrd.cipav.org.co/lrrd22/2/wall22032.htm (accessed on 18 June 2025).
- Wang, B.; Luo, Y.; Myung, K.H.; Liu, J.X. Effects of storage duration and temperature on the chemical composition, microorganism density, and rumen fermentation of wet brewers grains. Asian-Australasian J. Anim. Sci. 2014, 27, 832–840. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Mannaa, M.; Kim, K.D. Influence of temperature and water activity on deleterious fungi and mycotoxin production during grain storage. Mycobiology 2017, 45, 240–254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Rathod, A.; Kumawat, M. Storage of feed ingredients and finished feed. Indian. Farmer. 2024, 11, 77–82. [Google Scholar]
- Negash, D. A review of aflatoxin: Occurrence, prevention, and gaps in both food and feed safety. J. Appl. Microbiol. Res. 2018, 1, 34–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Kirigia, D.; Winkelmann, T.; Kasili, R.; Mibus, H. Development stage, storage temperature and storage duration influence phytonutrient content in cowpea (Vigna unguiculata L. Walp.). Heliyon 2018, 4, e00656. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Bragança, G.C.M.; Ziegler, V.; Ávila, B.P.; Monks, J.L.F.; Peres, W.; Elias, M.C. Multivariate analysis of the conditions of temperature, moisture and storage time in the technological, chemical, nutritional parameters and phytochemical of green lentils. J. Stored Prod. Res. 2020, 87, 101617. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Swart, W.J.; Swart, V.R. An overview of research on diseases of cactus pear in South Africa. J. Prof. Assoc. Cactus Dev. 2003, 5, 115–120. [Google Scholar]
- Flores, R.F.; del Valle, M.G.V.; Rodriguez, R.L.; Moctezuma, H.E.F.; Lauzardo, A.N.H. Identification of fungal species associated with cladode spot of prickly pear and their sensitivity to chitosan. J. Phytopathol. 2013, 161, 544–552. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Cervera, C.Z.L.; Salinas, Q.A.; Ramírez, V.P.; Cupul, W.C.; Antonio, J.E.C.; Rangel, J.C.S. Fungal causal agents of the Black Spot of the cactus (Opuntia ficus-indica) in Colima, Mexico. Mex. J. Phytopathol. 2024, 42, 20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Wegulo, S.; Giesler, L.; Harveson, R.; Jackson-Ziems, T.A.; Liu, B.; Korus, K. Impacts of Drought on Disease Development and Management; Papers Plant Pathology; University of Nebraska: Lincoln, NE, USA, 2013; Available online: https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/plantpathpapers (accessed on 10 December 2025).
- Hamidou, F.; Rathore, A.; Waliyar, F.; Vadez, V. Although drought intensity increases aflatoxin contamination, drought tolerance does not lead to less aflatoxin contamination. Field Crops Res. 2014, 156, 103–110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Ssepuuya, G.; Van Poucke, C.; Ediage, E.N.; Mulholland, C.; Tritscher, A.; Verger, P.; Kenny, M.; Bessy, C.; De Saeger, S. Mycotoxin contamination of sorghum and its contribution to human dietary exposure in four sub-Saharan countries. Food Addit. Contam. Part A 2018, 35, 1384–1393. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Nkomo, G.V.; Sedibe, M.M.; Mofokeng, M.A. Production Constraints and Improvement Strategies of Cowpea (Vigna unguiculata L. Walp.) Genotypes for Drought Tolerance. Int. J. Agron. 2021, 2021, 5536417. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Queiroz, O.C.M.; Ogunade, I.M.; Weinberg, Z.; Adesogan, A.T. Silage review: Foodborne pathogens in silage and their mitigation by silage additives. J. Dairy Sci. 2018, 101, 4132–4142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- FAO; IFIF. Good Practices for the Feed Industry—Implementing the Codex Alimentarius Code of Practice on Good Animal Feeding; FAO Animal Production and Health Manual No. 9; FAO: Rome, Italy, 2010. [Google Scholar]
- Tufarelli, V.; Puvača, N.; Glamočić, D.; Pugliese, G.; Colonna, M.A. The most important metabolic diseases in dairy cattle during the transition period. Animals 2024, 14, 816. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- National Academies of Sciences Engineering and Medicine, Division on Earth and Life Studies, Committee on Nutrient Requirements of Beef Cattle. Nutrient Requirements of Beef Cattle, 8th revised ed.; National Academies Press: Washington, DC, USA, 2021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Rashwan, A.K.; Osman, A.I.; Abdelshafy, A.M.; Mo, J.; Chen, W. Plant-based proteins: Advanced extraction technologies, interactions, physicochemical and functional properties, food and related applications, and health benefits. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 2025, 65, 667–694. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Brink, M.; Janssens, G.P.J.; Demeyer, P.; Bağci, Ö.; Delezie, E. Reduction of dietary crude protein and feed form: Impact on broiler litter quality, ammonia concentrations, excreta composition, performance, welfare, and meat quality. Anim. Nutr. 2022, 9, 291–303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Kurniawan, A.; Natsir, M.H.; Suyadi, S.; Sjofjan, O.; Nuningtyas, Y.F.; Ardiantoro, A.; Furqon, A.; Lestari, S.P. The effect of feeding with different protein levels on internal organ weight and gene expression of MEF2A and ATF3 in crossbred local chicken using RT-PCR. J. Genet. Eng. Biotechnol. 2023, 21, 83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Zhu, W.; Xu, W.; Wei, C.; Zhang, Z.; Jiang, C.; Chen, X. Effects of decreasing dietary crude protein level on growth performance, nutrient digestion, serum metabolites, and nitrogen utilization in growing goat kids (Capra. hircus). Animals 2020, 10, 151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Lalman, D.; Holder, A. Nutrient Requirements of Beef Cattle; Oklahoma State University: Stillwater, OK, USA, 2023; Available online: https://extension.okstate.edu/fact-sheets/print-publications/e/nutrient-requirements-of-beef-cattle-e-974-a.pdf (accessed on 9 December 2025).
- Lavery, A.; Craig, A.; Gordon, A.W.; White, A.; Barkley, N.; Ferris, C.P. Reducing dietary crude protein levels while meeting metabolizable protein requirements: Performance of dairy cows over a full lactation period. J. Dairy Sci. 2025, 108, 1451–1473. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Brainer, M.M.d.A.; Rabello, C.B.-V.; Batista dos Santos, M.J.; Ludke, J.V.; Lopes, C.d.C.; Leite de Medeiros, W.R.; Costa, F.G.P. Crude protein requirements of free-range laying hens. Anim. Prod. Sci. 2016, 56, 1622. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Jie, Y.-Z.; Zhang, J.-Y.; Zhao, L.-H.; Ma, Q.-G.; Ji, C. The correlationship between the metabolizable energy content, chemical composition and color score in different sources of corn DDGS. J. Anim. Sci. Biotechnol. 2013, 4, 38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Singh, S.; Bhat, B.V.; Shukla, G.P.; Gaharana, D.; Anele, U.Y. Nutritional evaluation of different varieties of sorghum stovers in sheep. Anim. Feed. Sci. Technol. 2017, 227, 42–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Santhosh, A.V.; Ramachandra, B.; Manjunatha, H.; Malashree, L.; Rajunaik, B. Exploring nutritional diversity in millets: A comparative study on protein and crude fiber content. J. Sci. Res. Rep. 2024, 30, 458–465. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Murugan, S.; Paramasivam, S.K.; Nedunchezhiyan, M.; Byju, G. Sweet potato as animal feed and fodder. Fruit. Veg. Cereal Sci. Biotech. 2012, 6, 106–114. [Google Scholar]
- Almaz, A.; Tamir, B.; Melaku, S. Feed Intake, digestibility and live weight change of lambs fed finger millet (Eleusine coracana) straw supplemented with atella, noug Seed (Guizotia abyssinica) cake and their mixtures. Agric. Trop. Subtrop. 2012, 45, 105–111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Agustin, F.; Erpomen Ningrat, R.W.S. The Use of Cassava Peel as a Source of Energy for Substituting Rice Bran in Ration Containing Gliricidia maculata Leaves in Dairy Cows. IOP Conf. Ser. Earth Environ. Sci. 2020, 478, 012077. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Gannuscio, R.; Vastolo, A.; Maniaci, G.; Lucia, C.; Calabrò, S.; Todaro, M.; Cutrignelli, M.I. Improve nutritive value of silage based on prickly pear peel by-products. Ital. J. Anim. Sci. 2024, 23, 492–503. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Rodrigues, A.M.; Pitacas, F.I.; Reis, C.M.G.; Blasco, M. Nutritional value of Opuntia ficus-indica cladodes from Portuguese ecotypes. Bulg. J. Agric. Sci. 2016, 22, 40–45. [Google Scholar]
- Dias, C.S.A.M.M.; Nunes, H.P.B.; Vouzela, C.F.M.; Madruga, J.S.; Borba, A.E.S. Influence of the season on the nutritive value and gas production of Opuntia ficus-indica and Agave americana L. in ruminant feed. Animals 2023, 13, 1008. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Oladimeji, S.O.; Adeyemi, A.A.; Mosuro, A.O.; Adebayo, B.F.; Etop, S.C.; Adebiyi, F.G.; Ogunwole, O.A. Nutritional composition of cassava (Manihot esculenta Crantz) peel products. Livest. Res. Rural Dev. 2022, 34, 1–7. [Google Scholar]
- Liu, C.; Asano, S.; Ogata, H.; Ito, S.; Nakase, T.; Takeda, S.; Miyoshi, K.; Numata, Y.; Takahashi, K.; Kajikawa, H. Digestive, fermentative, and physical properties of pineapple residue as a feed for cattle. Anim. Sci. J. 2021, 92, 13535. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Kyawt, Y.; Win, K.; Mu, K.; Aung, A.; Aung, M. Feeding pineapple waste silage as roughage source improved the nutrient intakes, energy status and growth performances of growing Myanmar local cattle. J. Adv. Vet. Anim. Res. 2020, 7, 436. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Degu, A.; Melaku, S.; Berhane, G. Supplementation of isonitrogenous oil seed cakes in cactus (Opuntia ficus-indica)–tef straw (Eragrostis tef) based feeding of Tigray Highland sheep. Anim. Feed. Sci. Technol. 2009, 148, 214–226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Frei, M. Lignin: Characterization of a multifaceted crop Component. Sci. World J. 2013, 1, 436517. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Getachew, G.; Laca, E.A.; Putnam, D.H.; Witte, D.; McCaslin, M.; Ortega, K.P.; DePeters, E.J. The impact of lignin downregulation on alfalfa yield, chemical composition, and in vitro gas production. J. Sci. Food Agric. 2018, 98, 4205–4215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Casler, M.D. Breeding forage crops for increased nutritional value. Adv. Agron. 2001, 71, 51–107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Cannas, A.; Van Soest, P.J.; Pell, A.N. Use of animal and dietary information to predict rumen turnover. Anim. Feed. Sci. Technol. 2003, 106, 95–117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Stypinski, J.D.; Weiss, W.P.; Carroll, A.L.; Kononoff, P.J. Effect of acid detergent lignin concentration for diets formulated to be similar in neutral detergent fiber content on energy utilization in lactating Jersey cows. J. Dairy Sci. 2024, 107, 5699–5708. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Qiu, Q.; Gao, C.; Aziz ur Rahman, M.; Cao, B.; Su, H. Digestive Ability, Physiological Characteristics, and Rumen Bacterial Community of Holstein Finishing Steers in Response to Three Nutrient Density Diets as Fattening Phases Advanced. Microorganisms 2020, 8, 335. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Zhong, H.; Zhou, J.; Abdelrahman, M.; Xu, H.; Wu, Z.; Cui, L.; Ma, Z.; Yang, L.; Li, X. The Effect of Lignin Composition on Ruminal Fiber Fractions Degradation from Different Roughage Sources in Water Buffalo (Bubalus bubalis). Agriculture 2021, 11, 1015. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Atuhaire, A.M.; Kabi, F.; Okello, S.; Mugerwa, S.; Ebong, C. Optimizing bio-physical conditions and pre-treatment options for breaking lignin barrier of maize stover feed using white rot fungi. Anim. Nutr. 2016, 2, 361–369. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Huang, H.; Wang, Z.; Pan, S.C.; Shoup, L.M.; Felix, T.L.; Perkins, J.B.; May, O.; Singh, V. Fungal pretreatment to improve digestibility of corn stover for animal feed. Trans. ASABE 2017, 60, 973–979. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Escapa, A.; Gil-Carrera, L.; García, V.; Morán, A. Performance of a continuous flow microbial electrolysis cell (MEC) fed with domestic wastewater. Bioresour. Technol. 2012, 117, 55–62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Jędrzejczyk, M.; Soszka, E.; Czapnik, M.; Ruppert, A.M.; Grams, J. Physical and chemical pretreatment of lignocellulosic biomass. In Second and Third Generation of Feedstocks; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2019; pp. 143–196. [Google Scholar]
- Agbor, V.B.; Cicek, N.; Sparling, R.; Berlin, A.; Levin, D.B. Biomass pretreatment: Fundamentals toward application. Biotechnol. Adv. 2011, 29, 675–685. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Nayan, N.; Sonnenberg, A.S.M.; Hendriks, W.H.; Cone, J.W. Prospects and feasibility of fungal pretreatment of agricultural biomass for ruminant feeding. Anim. Feed. Sci. Technol. 2020, 268, 114577. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- van der Pol, E.C.; Vaessen, E.; Weusthuis, R.A.; Eggink, G. Identifying inhibitory effects of lignocellulosic by-products on growth of lactic acid producing micro-organisms using a rapid small-scale screening method. Bioresour. Technol. 2016, 209, 297–304. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Chen, J.; Ma, X.; Liang, M.; Guo, Z.; Cai, Y.; Zhu, C.; Wang, Z.; Wang, S.; Xu, J.; Ying, H. Physical–Chemical–Biological Pretreatment for Biomass Degradation and Industrial Applications: A Review. Waste 2024, 2, 451–473. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Kusmiati, R.; Syaputri, Y.; Abun; Safitri, R. Pretreatment and fermentation of lignocellulose from oil palm fronds as a potential source of fibre for ruminant feed: A review. J. Sustain. Agric. Environ. 2024, 3, 1–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Lee, H. The Current Status and Constraints of Drought-Tolerant Maize Adoption in Uganda. Open Agric. J. 2020, 14, 98–107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Rao, A.S. Climate and microclimate changes influencing the fauna of the hot Indian arid zone. In Faunal Ecology and Conservation of the Great Indian Desert; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2009; pp. 13–23. [Google Scholar]
- Kamara, A.Y.; Adesiyan, A.T.; Oyinbo, O.; Ajeigbe, H.A.; Ignatius, A.I.; Oluwole, T.S. Improving the productivity and income of smallholder sorghum farmers: The role of improved crop varieties in Nigeria. Food Energy Secur. 2025, 14, e70058. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Acevedo, M.; Pixley, K.; Zinyengere, N.; Meng, S.; Tufan, H.; Cichy, K.; Bizikova, L.; Isaacs, K.; Ghezzi-Kopel, K.; Porciello, J. A scoping review of adoption of climate-resilient crops by small-scale producers in low- and middle-income countries. Nat. Plants 2020, 6, 1231–1241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Westengen, O.T.; Dalle, S.P.; Mulesa, T.H. Navigating toward resilient and inclusive seed systems. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2023, 120, e2218777120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Olabanji, M.F.; Chitakira, M. The adoption and scaling of climate-smart agriculture innovation by smallholder farmers in South Africa: A review of institutional mechanisms, policy frameworks and market dynamics. World 2025, 6, 51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Zougmoré, R.; Partey, S.; Ouédraogo, M.; Omitoyin, B.; Thomas, T.; Ayantunde, A.; Ericksen, P.; Said, M.; Jalloh, A. Toward climate-smart agriculture in West Africa: A review of climate change impacts, adaptation strategies and policy developments for the livestock, fishery and crop production sectors. Agric. Food Secur. 2016, 5, 26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Wongnaa, C.A.; Seyram, A.A.; Babu, S. A systematic review of climate change impacts, adaptation strategies, and policy development in West Africa. Reg. Sustain. 2024, 5, 100137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Du Preez, C.C.; Van Huyssteen, C.W.; Mnkeni, P.N.S. Land use and soil organic matter in South Africa 1: A review on spatial variability and the influence of rangeland stock production. S. Afr. J. Sci. 2011, 107, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Omotoso, A.B.; Omotayo, A.O. Impact of behavioural intention to adopt climate-smart agricultural practices on the food and nutrition security of farming households: A microeconomic level evidence. Clim. Change 2024, 177, 117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- CIAT; World Bank. Climate-Smart Agriculture in Malawi; CSA Country Profiles for Africa Series; International Center for Tropical Agriculture (CIAT): Cali, Colombia, 2018; Volume 30. [Google Scholar]
- Kruger, E.; Dlamini, M.C.; Mathebula, T.; Ngcobo, P.; Maimela, B.T.; Sisitka, L. Climate Change Adaptation for Smallholder Farmers in South Africa—Volume 2 Part 4: An Implementation and Support Guide: Field Cropping and Livestock Integration Practices; Water Research Commission: Pretoria, South Africa, 2021; Available online: www.wrc.org.za (accessed on 21 February 2026).
- Maifo Matome, C. Stock Fodder Drought Relief Scheme: A Case of the Department of Agriculture in Polokwane Municipality. Master’s Thesis, University of The Free State, Bloemfontein, South Africa, 2011. [Google Scholar]
- The World Bank. Program Appraisal Document on a Proposed Loan in the Amount of Euro 185.6 Million to the People’s Republic of China. For a Sustainable Fodder Production and Low Methane Livestock Development: Program-for-Results; The World Bank: Washington, DC, USA, 2024. [Google Scholar]
- The World Bank. The World Bank Regenerative Farming for Agro-Pastoral Livelihoods and Climate Resilience in Ethiopia (P505075); The World Bank: Washington, DC, USA, 2024; Available online: https://www.fess-global.org/Publications/Other/Climate_Change_and_Conflic_%20in_Ethiopia.pdf (accessed on 21 February 2026).
- The World Bank. Program Appraisal Document on a Proposed Loan in the Amount of EUR 115.5 Million (US $120 Million Equivalent) to the Republic of Costa Rica for a Program for Sustainable and Competitive Agriculture in Costa Rica; The World Bank: Washington, DC, USA, 2025. [Google Scholar]
- The World Bank. Project Appraisal Document on a Proposed Loan in the Amount of US$490 Million to India for a Maharashtra Project on Climate Resilient Agriculture Phase II; The World Bank: Washington, DC, USA, 2025. [Google Scholar]
- The World Bank. Emergency Food Security Project (P178280); The World Bank: Washington, DC, USA, 2025. [Google Scholar]
- The Word Bank. Project Appraisal Document on a Proposed Credit in the Amount of SDR 184.7 Million (US $250 Million Equivalent) for a Kenya Climate-Smart Agriculture Project; The World Bank: Washington, DC, USA, 2017. [Google Scholar]
- Vollum, S.D.K.; Raha, D.; Koomson, D. Climate change impact and adaptation: Lagoonal fishing communities in West Africa 108. In African Handbook of Climate Change Adaptation; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Sorgho, R.; Quiñonez, C.A.M.; Louis, V.R.; Winkler, V.; Dambach, P.; Sauerborn, R.; Horstick, O. Climate change policies in 16 West African countries: A systematic review of adaptation with a focus on agriculture, food security, and nutrition. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2020, 17, 8897. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]







| Chemical Component | Fat | CF | CP | Ash | Carbohydrate | ME | References | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Drought-tolerant crop | Sorghum | 3–5 | 1–3 | 6–9 | 1–2 | 72–78 | 14.31–16.35 | [53,54] |
| Pearl Millet | 5–10 | 2–18 | 4–17 | 1–2 | 55–81 | 8.4–10.3 | [55,56] | |
| Finger millet | 1–2 | 0.9–10 | 2.6–14 | 2–4 | 68–79 | 6.5–6.9 | [55,57] | |
| False Banana | 0.1–0.6 | 0.1–0.2 | 0.6–2 | 1–2 | 94–98 | 4.2–12.2 | [58,59] | |
| * Cassava | 0.2–0.6 | - | 1–2 | 1–2 | 89–93 | 14.2–19.3 | [60,61] | |
| * Cactus | 1–2 | 18–22 | 4–6 | 3–7 | - | 8.8–9.9 | [62,63] | |
| Commercial feed crop | Soybean meal | 1–2 | 3–4 | 46–49 | 6–7 | 27–30 | 9–9.4 | [64] |
| Maize | 1–3 | 0.9–2 | 6–8 | 1–2 | 79–83 | 8.7–9.6 | [65,66] |
| Metric | Drought-Tolerant Crops (e.g., Cactus, Sorghum, Millet, Cassava) | Commercial Crops (e.g., Maize, Wheat, Alfalfa, Rice Straw, Sugarcane) | References |
|---|---|---|---|
| Carbon footprint | Low (less methane emissions, maintains soil carbon content, lower milk and meat carbon footprint approximately: 1.30 kg CO2 eq/kg FPCM and 10.2 kg CO2 eq/kg LWG). | High (increased methane emissions, reduced soil carbon content, an estimated equivalent of 6094 kg CO2 eq/ha and 2882 kg CO2 eq/ha in greenhouse gas emission; 263 kg CO2 eq emissions, 685.66 kg CO2 eq/t feed). | [150,151,152,153,154] |
| Water-use efficiency | High (less than 500 L/kg of grain; equivalent to 5.93 kg m−2 low evapotranspiration daily rate; high increase of about 30% in water-use efficiency; transpiration ratio of 25–80; low water footprint; reduced crop water use). | Low (equivalent to 5.01 kg m−2, high daily rate of evapotranspiration, reduction of about 43% WUE, transpiration ratio of 200–800 and 100–400, high water footprint, high water consumption). | [153,155,156,157,158,159] |
| Yield | High (fresh forage yield highest leaf area, ear panicle and length growth rates of approximately 0.44 Mg/ha; high dry matter yield). | Low (ear panicle length less than 17.2 cm, growth rate lower than 0.35 Mg/ha [160]; low dry matter yield). | [157,158,159,160] |
| Input cost | Low (low total variable costs of about 20%; cactus diet lowers feeding costs; minimum land required to produce maximum economic returns; reduction in feed costs). | High (moderately high costs of variables; higher feeding costs; large land size to produce maximum profit margins; high production cost of feed; higher production cost). | [145,154,161,162,163,164] |
| Economic returns | High (maximum economic gain of approximately 711.6 USD/ha with low inputs, benefit–cost ratio (5.9), high gross margins, internal rate of return equating to about 46%, and high profit margins during drought) | Low (minimum gross margins; lower profitability rate). | [145,158,162,163,164] |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2026 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license.
Share and Cite
Tonisi, S.; Kaseke, T.; Masondo, N.A.; Adeyemi, J.O.; Fawole, O.A. Advancements in Sustainable Livestock Feed: Harnessing Drought-Tolerant Crops. Animals 2026, 16, 753. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani16050753
Tonisi S, Kaseke T, Masondo NA, Adeyemi JO, Fawole OA. Advancements in Sustainable Livestock Feed: Harnessing Drought-Tolerant Crops. Animals. 2026; 16(5):753. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani16050753
Chicago/Turabian StyleTonisi, Sipho, Tafadzwa Kaseke, Nqobile A. Masondo, Jerry O. Adeyemi, and Olaniyi A. Fawole. 2026. "Advancements in Sustainable Livestock Feed: Harnessing Drought-Tolerant Crops" Animals 16, no. 5: 753. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani16050753
APA StyleTonisi, S., Kaseke, T., Masondo, N. A., Adeyemi, J. O., & Fawole, O. A. (2026). Advancements in Sustainable Livestock Feed: Harnessing Drought-Tolerant Crops. Animals, 16(5), 753. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani16050753

