Next Article in Journal
Factors Associated with Veterinary Professionals’ Intent to Intervene in Cases of Animal Maltreatment
Previous Article in Journal
Landscape Genomics Reveals Divergent Adaptation Modes and Predicts Climate Vulnerability in Xinjiang Indigenous Sheep
Previous Article in Special Issue
Proteomic Analysis of Dairy Cows with Persistent Subclinical Hypocalcemia
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Comparative Evaluation of Chemically Synthesized and Biosynthesized 25-Hydroxyvitamin D3 Supplementation in Sows During Late Gestation and Lactation

1
State Key Laboratory of Animal Nutrition and Feeding, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs Feed Industry Centre, National Feed Engineering Technology Research Center, China Agricultural University, No. 2 Yuanmingyuan West Road, Beijing 100193, China
2
Beijing Hilink Biotechnology Co., Ltd., Beijing 102206, China
3
College of Animal Science and Technology, Northwest A&F University, Yangling 712100, China
4
UWA School of Agriculture and Environment, University of Western Australia, Crawley, WA 6009, Australia
5
Key Ingredients Biotechnology (Yichang) Co., Ltd., Yichang 443000, China
6
The Municipal Animal Husbandry General Station of Beijing, A15 Beiyuan Road, Chaoyang District, Beijing 100107, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Animals 2026, 16(17), 2674; https://doi.org/10.3390/ani16172674
Submission received: 6 July 2026 / Revised: 10 August 2026 / Accepted: 15 August 2026 / Published: 26 August 2026

Simple Summary

We compared chemically synthesized and microbially biosynthesized 25-hydroxyvitamin D3 at similar dietary inclusion levels from late gestation to weaning in sows. Maternal supplementation with 25-hydroxyvitamin D3 increased vitamin D status in sows and piglets and produced source-dependent changes in downstream vitamin D metabolites, antioxidant status, inflammatory markers, bone mineralization, and intestinal development. Among the three preparations, the yeast-derived QV2 treatment showed the strongest responses for selected outcomes, including greater litter weight gain from birth to day 14, higher colostrum 25-hydroxyvitamin D3 concentration, and increased femoral calcium concentration in weaned piglets. QV2 and QV3 also increased jejunal and ileal villus height. However, treatment rankings were not consistent across all measured endpoints, and litter and average piglet weights at weaning were not significantly affected. Therefore, these findings indicate product-specific responses and do not demonstrate general superiority of biosynthesized 25-hydroxyvitamin D3 preparations over chemically synthesized products.

Abstract

Vitamin D and its metabolite 25-hydroxyvitamin D3 (25-OH-D3) are central to calcium homeostasis, maternal skeletal integrity, and sow reproductive efficiency. This study compared vitamin D3 with an equivalent supranutritional dose of chemically or microbially produced 25-OH-D3 from day 90 of gestation to weaning. A total of 100 Large White × Landrace sows were assigned to five treatments (n = 20): a basal control (25 µg/kg vitamin D3), a VD3 group (basal + 50 µg/kg vitamin D3), and three 25-OH-D3 groups (basal + 50 µg/kg 25-OH-D3; QV1–QV3). Reproductive traits, colostrum composition, serum vitamin D-related indices, antioxidant and cytokine profiles, pre-weaning piglet growth, femoral mineral concentration, intestinal morphology, and barrier-related gene expression were assessed. Compared with the control, QV2 increased litter weight gain from birth to day 14 by 9.8%, piglet serum 25-OH-D3 at weaning by 33.2%, and femoral calcium concentration by 14.4% (p < 0.05); litter and average piglet weights at weaning were unchanged. Maternal 25-OH-D3 supplementation also altered the overall redox profile and several circulating inflammatory cytokines, increased jejunal and ileal villus height in the QV2 and QV3 groups, and upregulated selected tight-junction-related genes, including occludin and ZO-1, in a source- and intestinal-segment-dependent manner (p < 0.05). Responses were source-dependent, and QV2 showed the strongest effects for selected endpoints; the data do not support class-wide superiority of biosynthesized preparations.

1. Introduction

Sow reproductive efficiency is pivotal for herd productivity and is closely linked to maternal skeletal health, a key determinant of sow longevity [1]. During late gestation and lactation, sows must transfer large amounts of calcium to support rapid fetal growth and milk production, which inevitably increases mobilization of Ca from the maternal skeleton and predisposes sows to bone loss [2,3]. Importantly, evidence suggests that Ca supplementation alone is often insufficient to prevent this excessive skeletal mobilization in late gestation and lactation [3,4,5], indicating that additional nutritional or endocrine regulators of Ca homeostasis are required.
Vitamin D plays an important role in maintaining calcium homeostasis for bone mineralization and skeletal muscle development [6,7]. Dietary vitamin D3 undergoes sequential hydroxylation in the liver and kidneys to generate 1,25-(OH)2-D3, which regulates calcium balance by enhancing intestinal absorption and renal reabsorption and, when necessary, mobilizing skeletal calcium [8,9,10]. By contrast, 25-hydroxyvitamin D3 (25-OH-D3) bypasses hepatic hydroxylation and is more readily available for subsequent activation [11,12]. In pigs, maternal 25-OH-D3 supplementation has been reported to influence sow reproductive performance and colostrum composition and to support intestinal calcium absorption and bone properties in sow–piglet pairs [13,14]. Studies involving direct dietary supplementation of weaned piglets have associated 25-OH-D3 with bone quality, antioxidant and immune indices, intestinal morphology, and tight-junction-related gene expression [15,16]. Thus, the reproductive and colostrum evidence derives from maternal sow studies, whereas much of the intestinal and immune evidence derives from direct supplementation studies in weaned piglets. Direct head-to-head comparisons among 25-OH-D3 preparations produced by different chemical or microbial routes remain scarce, which provides the rationale and novelty for the present study.
Accordingly, we hypothesized that 25-OH-D3 preparations manufactured through different routes could produce source-dependent responses because differences in formulation, purity, stereochemical composition, stability, or recovery in feed may alter effective bioavailability even when the nominal supplemental dose is identical. The comparison was intended to evaluate biological responses among the available preparations rather than to attribute any observed difference solely to chemical or microbial origin. QV1 was commercially available, and chemically synthesized 25-OH-D3 was used as the reference material. QV2 and QV3 were biosynthesized 25-OH-D3 preparations produced using Saccharomyces cerevisiae and Bacillus subtilis as production strains, respectively. These strains were selected because they were the production hosts of the available candidate preparations and represented yeast- and bacterial-based biosynthetic platforms. Their inclusion was exploratory and was not based on prior evidence that one production strain would be biologically superior to the other in sows. The objective was to compare the three preparations during late gestation and lactation with respect to reproductive performance, maternal and offspring vitamin D-related indices, oxidative and inflammatory markers, piglet growth, femoral mineral concentrations, intestinal morphology, and barrier-related gene expression.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Animals and Experimental Design

This experiment was conducted at Saneng Pig Farm (Shanxi, China) and approved by the Animal Care and Use Committee of China Agricultural University (AW01705202-1-3, approval date: 10 July 2025). A total of 100 Large White × Landrace sows (parity: 4.25 ± 0.88; P2 backfat thickness: 17.50 ± 1.54 mm) were blocked by parity and P2 backfat thickness and then randomly assigned within each block to one of five dietary treatments (n = 20 per treatment): CON (basal diet containing 25 µg/kg vitamin D3), VD3 (CON plus 50 µg/kg vitamin D3), and QV1–QV3 (CON plus 50 µg/kg 25-hydroxyvitamin D3 from three sources). Diets were formulated to meet NRC [17] requirements for late gestation and lactation. The feeding period extended from day 90 of gestation to weaning (day 28 of lactation). Sows were individually housed with ad libitum access to water and received feed three times daily (08:00, 14:00, and 20:00).

2.2. Dietary Composition

Gestation and lactation diets were corn–soybean meal-based and supplemented with a vitamin–mineral premix (1%) and phytase. The premix supplied 25 µg/kg (1000 IU/kg) vitamin D3, with additional vitamin D3 or 25-OH-D3 provided according to treatment. Because mineral metabolism and skeletal outcomes were central to the study, the basal gestation and lactation diets contained 0.67% and 0.88% calcium, 0.68% and 0.59% total phosphorus, and 0.26% and 0.38% available phosphorus, respectively (Table 1).

Supplement Sources and Diet Verification

QV1 was a chemically synthesized 25-OH-D3 used as the reference material. QV2 and QV3 were biosynthesized 25-OH-D3 preparations produced using Saccharomyces cerevisiae and Bacillus subtilis as production strains, respectively. QV1, QV2, and QV3 were formulated premixes with a nominal 25-OH-D3 content of 0.05% (w/w), with modified starch used as the carrier. The analyzed 25-OH-D3 contents of the QV1, QV2, and QV3 premixes were 0.055%, 0.054%, and 0.056% (w/w), respectively, as determined according to the Chinese agricultural industry standard NY/T 3879-2021 [18], Determination of 25-Hydroxyvitamin D3 in Feeds. The premixes were added to the diets at 100 mg/kg, providing 50 μg/kg 25-OH-D3. The CON and VD3 diets received the same amount of modified starch carrier. Because the final dietary concentration was below the detection limit of the available method, dietary 25-OH-D3 concentrations are reported as formulated values.

2.3. Sample Collection

Reproductive traits (total born, born alive, stillborns, mummified fetuses, piglets weaned, and farrowing duration) were recorded. Sow body weight and P2 backfat were measured at farrowing and weaning to calculate backfat loss; feed allowance during gestation and daily intake during lactation were recorded. Piglets were weighed at birth, day 14, and weaning, and litter weight gain was calculated. Six sows per treatment were randomly selected for blood and colostrum sampling. Sow blood samples were collected on gestation day 90 before the initiation of the experimental diets, at farrowing, and at weaning, and colostrum samples were collected at farrowing (n = 6 per treatment). At weaning, one clinically healthy piglet whose body weight was closest to the mean body weight of its litter was selected from each of six sampled litters per treatment and euthanized for collection of serum, liver, duodenum, jejunum, ileum, femur, and tibia. Piglet sex was not controlled during selection. The subset size was specified before sampling based on assay and terminal-tissue capacity while retaining six independent sows or litters per treatment. When cross-fostering was required, piglets were transferred only among sows in the same treatment, and litter performance outcomes were calculated using the actual post-fostering litter composition.

2.4. Vitamin D Metabolites, Biochemical Indices, Antioxidants, Cytokines, and Immunoglobulins

Serum and colostrum 25-OH-D3 were measured using a competitive ELISA kit (HB402-SH), and ALP using an assay kit (L-726-SH) (Shanghai Hengyuan Biotechnology Co., Shanghai, China). Concentrations of 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3 [1,25-(OH)2-D3], 24,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3 [24,25-(OH)2-D3], and vitamin D-binding protein (DBP) were quantified using commercial ELISA kits (HY028-NC, HY094-SH, and HY350-Pg, respectively). Serum calcium was measured by a GBHA-based micro-colorimetric method (520 nm), and serum phosphorus by a phosphomolybdate microplate method (660 nm). Antioxidant indices were determined using porcine ELISA kits for SOD (HB326X-Pg), GSH-Px (HB463X-Pg), CAT (HB251X-Pg), and MDA (HB443-Pg). Cytokines (IL-1β, HB354-Pg; IL-6, HB347-Pg; IL-10, HB359-Pg; TNF-α, HB015-Pg; IFN-γ, HB363-Pg) and colostrum IgG (HS173-Pg) and IgM (HS170-Pg) were quantified by ELISA. All ELISA kits were purchased from Shanghai Hengyuan Biotechnology Co., Ltd. (Shanghai, China) and were used according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The assay ranges and analytical sensitivities were 0.3–20 μg/L and 0.1 μg/L for 25-OH-D3, 3.2–200 pg/mL and 3 pg/mL for 1,25-(OH)2-D3, 0.32–20 ng/mL and 0.17 ng/mL for 24,25-(OH)2-D3, and 15.6–1000 μg/mL and 9.8 μg/mL for DBP, 1–45 ng/L and 0.25 ng/L for IL-1β, 50–1000 ng/L and 12.5 ng/L for IL-6, 8–180 ng/L and 2 ng/L for IL-10, 0.3–8 nmol/L and 0.075 nmol/L for MDA, 40–2000 U/L and 10 U/L for SOD, 5–165 IU/L and 1.25 IU/L for GSH-Px, 35–1500 U/L and 8.75 U/L for CAT, 10–400 pg/mL and 2.5 pg/mL for TNF-α, 100–2400 pg/mL and 25 pg/mL for IFN-γ, 12–400 μg/mL and 3 μg/mL for IgG and 1.2–40 μg/mL and 0.3 μg/mL for IgM, respectively. Absorbance was measured at 450 nm using a microplate reader. All samples were analyzed in duplicate, and samples with concentrations outside the lot-specific standard curve range were re-assayed after appropriate dilution. According to the manufacturer’s quality control specifications, the intra-assay and inter-assay coefficients of variation for the ELISA kits were less than 10% and 15%, respectively. The detection ranges and analytical sensitivities of individual kits followed the corresponding lot-specific instructions, and all reported concentrations fell within the respective standard curve ranges.

2.5. Quantitative Real-Time PCR

Jejunal and ileal mRNA expression of tight junction and inflammation-related genes was quantified by qRT-PCR (Table 2). RNA was extracted with TRIzol (Invitrogen, Beijing, China), quantified by NanoDrop One (Thermo, Newark, DE, USA), reverse-transcribed (PrimeScript RT, Takara RR047A), and amplified on an ABI 7500 Fast system using TB Green (Takara RR820A). Expression was normalized to GAPDH and calculated by 2^−ΔΔCt.

2.6. Intestinal Histology and Morphometric Analysis

Jejunal and ileal tissues were fixed (4% paraformaldehyde), paraffin-embedded, sectioned (5 μm), and H&E-stained. Slides were scanned (Pannoramic MIDI, 3DHISTECH Ltd., Budapest, Hungary) and analyzed (CaseViewer, 3DHISTECH Ltd., Budapest, Hungary; Image-Pro Plus 6.0, Media Cybernetics, Inc., Rockville, MD, USA) to measure villus height, crypt depth, and villus-to-crypt ratio.

2.7. Bone Length and Mineral Determination

Femur and tibia lengths were measured with a digital caliper. Femur Ca, P, and ash were determined following GB/T 6438 [19]: Ca by flame photometry after hot H2SO4 digestion, P by molybdenum–antimony colorimetry (700 nm) after H2SO4–H2O2 digestion, and ash by dry ashing to constant weight.

2.8. Colostrum Routine Composition Analysis

Colostrum was stored at −80 °C, thawed at 4 °C, warmed (~40 °C), and mixed. Fat, protein, lactose, and total solids were measured using an FTIR milk analyzer (MilkoScan FT series, FOSS Analytical A/S, Hillerød, Denmark) in duplicate.

2.9. Statistical Analysis

Statistical analyses were performed using SAS 9.4. For each response variable, data were analyzed by one-way ANOVA using the GLM procedure according to Yij = μ + Ti + εij, where μ is the overall mean, Ti is the fixed effect of dietary treatment, and εij is the residual error. The sow was the experimental unit for sow and litter outcomes, and the litter was the experimental unit for piglet serum and tissue outcomes (one piglet per litter). Farrowing and weaning endpoints were analyzed separately; therefore, no repeated-measures term was fitted. Residual normality and homogeneity of variance were evaluated before inference, and no material violations were detected. For litter performance, the actual litter size and composition after within-treatment cross-fostering were used in calculating outcomes; litter size and piglet sex were not fitted as separate covariates. Means were compared using Tukey’s HSD test. Results are presented as mean ± SEM; p < 0.05 was considered significant and 0.05 ≤ p < 0.10 was considered a tendency.

3. Results

3.1. Effects of Maternal Vitamin D3 and 25-OH-D3 Supplementation on Sow Reproductive Performance and Piglet Growth

As shown in Table 3, treatment did not affect sow reproductive performance (p > 0.05). QV2 increased litter weight on day 14 and litter weight gain from birth to day 14 compared with all other treatments (p < 0.05). This early response did not persist to weaning: average piglet weight, litter weight, and litter weight gain from birth to weaning did not differ among treatments (p > 0.05).

3.2. Effects of Maternal 25-OH-D3 Supplementation on Chemical Compositions of Colostrum of Sows

As shown in Table 4, maternal VD3 and 25-OH-D3 supplementation significantly increased colostrum 25-OH-D3 concentration and ALP activity compared with the control group (p < 0.01), with QV2 showing the highest 25-OH-D3 concentration among all treatments. Colostrum Ca and P concentrations were not affected by treatment (p > 0.05).
In colostrum, maternal 25-OH-D3 supplementation reduced MDA concentration and enhanced SOD, GSH-Px, and CAT activities compared with the control group (p < 0.01), whereas VD3 supplementation only increased SOD activity (p < 0.01). No significant differences in these indices, except for higher SOD activity, were found between the control and VD3 groups (p > 0.05).
For cytokines, IL-10 concentration was higher in the VD3 and QV3 groups than in the control group (p < 0.05), and TNF-α concentration was lower in the QV1 group than in the control group (p < 0.05). IL-1β, IL-6, and IFN-γ were not significantly affected by treatment.

3.3. Effects of Maternal Vitamin D3 and 25-OH-D3 Supplementation on Serum 25-OH-D3, ALP, Calcium, and Phosphorus in Sows and Piglets

As shown in Table 5, maternal VD3 supplementation did not affect sow serum 25-OH-D3 at farrowing but significantly increased ALP activity (p < 0.01). At weaning, VD3 increased serum 25-OH-D3 concentration in sows and piglets without altering ALP activity. In contrast, maternal 25-OH-D3 supplementation significantly increased serum 25-OH-D3 concentration and ALP activity in sows at both farrowing and weaning, as well as in weaning piglets, compared with the control (p < 0.01). Serum Ca and P concentrations were not affected by treatment in sows or piglets (p > 0.05).

3.4. Effects of Maternal Vitamin D3 and 25-OH-D3 Supplementation on Downstream Vitamin D Metabolites and Vitamin D-Binding Protein in Sows and Piglets

As shown in Table 6, serum concentrations of 1,25-(OH)2-D3, 24,25-(OH)2-D3, and DBP did not differ among groups on gestation day 90, indicating comparable pretreatment values. At farrowing, all three 25-OH-D3 preparations increased serum 1,25-(OH)2-D3 compared with the control, with the highest numerical value observed in QV2 (p < 0.05). Serum 24,25-(OH)2-D3 was also increased by additional vitamin D3 and by all three 25-OH-D3 preparations, with QV2 showing the highest concentration (p < 0.05). Serum DBP was unaffected by treatment.
In colostrum, the QV1, QV2, and QV3 treatments increased 1,25-(OH)2-D3 compared with the control, whereas QV2 produced the highest concentration (p < 0.05). Colostrum 24,25-(OH)2-D3 was higher in all three 25-OH-D3 groups than in the control and VD3 groups, with the highest values observed in QV2 and QV3 (p < 0.05). Colostrum DBP did not differ among treatments.
In weaned piglets, serum and duodenal 1,25-(OH)2-D3 concentrations were not significantly affected by maternal treatment. In contrast, 24,25-(OH)2-D3 concentrations in both serum and duodenal tissue were higher in the QV1, QV2, and QV3 groups than in the control and VD3 groups, with QV2 and QV3 showing the highest values (p < 0.05). DBP concentrations in piglet serum and duodenal tissue were unaffected by treatment.

3.5. Effects of Maternal Vitamin D3 and 25-OH-D3 Supplementation on Serum Antioxidant Status in Sows and Piglets

As shown in Table 7, additional VD3 supplementation produced limited effects on serum antioxidant indices, reducing SOD activity in sows at farrowing and increasing GSH-Px activity in piglets at weaning, with no other significant changes. In contrast, all three 25-OH-D3 preparations consistently reduced serum MDA concentrations and increased SOD, GSH-Px, and CAT activities in sows at farrowing and weaning and in piglets at weaning (p < 0.01).

3.6. Effects of Maternal Vitamin D3 and 25-OH-D3 Supplementation on Serum Inflammatory Cytokines in Sows and Piglets

Table 8 summarizes serum cytokine concentrations. At farrowing, VD3 reduced IL-1β and IFN-γ, whereas the three 25-OH-D3 preparations produced source-dependent reductions in IL-1β, IL-6, TNF-α, and IFN-γ and increases in IL-10 (p < 0.05). At weaning, sow serum IL-1β, IL-6, TNF-α, and IFN-γ differed among treatments, whereas IL-10 was unaffected. The 25-OH-D3 preparations generally reduced pro-inflammatory cytokine concentrations, with QV2 and QV3 showing the most consistent reductions. In weaning piglets, IL-10 was unaffected, whereas IL-1β, IL-6, TNF-α, and IFN-γ showed source-dependent treatment responses (p < 0.05).

3.7. Effects of Maternal Vitamin D3 and 25-OH-D3 Supplementation on Skeletal Development in Piglets

As shown in Table 9, maternal 25-OH-D3 supplementation significantly increased bone Ca content in weaning piglets compared with the control and VD3 groups (p < 0.01), with the highest value observed in QV2, followed by QV3. No differences were observed in femur or tibia length, bone P content, or bone ash percentage among treatments (p > 0.05).

3.8. Effects of Maternal Vitamin D3 and 25-OH-D3 Supplementation on Intestinal Villus Development and Morphology in Piglets

As shown in Table 10 and Figure 1, jejunal and ileal villus height was significantly increased in the QV2 and QV3 groups compared with the control and VD3 groups (p < 0.01), whereas QV1 did not differ from the control (p > 0.05). In addition, jejunal villus height was also increased in the VD3 group compared with the control (p < 0.01), while ileal villus height did not differ between these two groups (p > 0.05). Consistently, the jejunal villus-to-crypt (V/C) ratio was significantly higher in QV2 and QV3 than in the other treatments (p < 0.01).

3.9. Effects of Maternal Vitamin D3 and 25-OH-D3 Supplementation on Gene Expression of Tight Junction Proteins and Inflammatory Cytokines in Piglet Intestines

As shown in Figure 2A,C, jejunal gene expression responses differed among treatments. Compared with the control, QV2 decreased the mRNA expression of NF-κB, TNF-α, IFN-γ, IL-1β, and IL-6 and increased IL-10 expression (p < 0.05). QV1 decreased NF-κB, TNF-α, IFN-γ, and IL-6, increased IL-10, and did not affect IL-1β (p < 0.05). QV3 increased IFN-γ and IL-1β, decreased IL-6, and did not affect NF-κB, TNF-α, or IL-10 (p < 0.05). VD3 increased IL-1β but did not affect NF-κB, TNF-α, IFN-γ, IL-6, or IL-10 relative to the control (p < 0.05). Claudin-1 expression was unchanged among treatments (p > 0.05), whereas occludin expression was increased in the VD3, QV1, QV2, and QV3 groups and ZO-1 expression was increased in the VD3, QV1, and QV2 groups (p < 0.05).
In the ileum (Figure 2B,D), QV2 decreased NF-κB, TNF-α, IFN-γ, and IL-1β expression compared with the control (p < 0.05). QV1 decreased NF-κB, TNF-α, and IL-1β but did not affect IFN-γ, whereas QV3 decreased all four transcripts (p < 0.05). VD3 decreased TNF-α and IL-1β but did not affect NF-κB or IFN-γ (p < 0.05). Ileal IL-6 and IL-10 expression did not differ among treatments (p > 0.05). Claudin-1 and ZO-1 expression were also unaffected (p > 0.05), whereas occludin expression was increased in the VD3 (p < 0.05), QV2, and QV3 groups but remained unchanged in QV1.

4. Discussion

Maternal 25-OH-D3 supplementation increased serum 25-OH-D3 concentrations in sows at farrowing and weaning and in piglets at weaning relative to the CON and VD3 groups; QV2 also yielded the highest colostrum concentration. However, treatment rankings were not uniform across endpoints: QV2 produced the strongest responses for selected outcomes, whereas QV1 or QV3 was similar or superior for others. The data therefore indicate product-specific responses among the three preparations tested and do not establish that biosynthesized 25-OH-D3 is generally superior to chemically synthesized 25-OH-D3.
Additional profiling of downstream vitamin D metabolites supported the treatment-related changes in vitamin D status. The absence of differences in 1,25-(OH)2-D3, 24,25-(OH)2-D3, and DBP on gestation day 90 confirmed comparable baseline conditions among treatments. At farrowing, maternal 25-OH-D3 supplementation increased serum and colostrum concentrations of both 1,25-(OH)2-D3 and 24,25-(OH)2-D3, with QV2 generally showing the strongest response. These findings are consistent with the capacity of porcine tissues to convert 25-OH-D3 through both 1α-hydroxylation and 24-hydroxylation pathways [20,21]. Similarly, Thayer et al. reported increased serum 24,25-(OH)2-D3 in progeny from 25-OH-D3-supplemented sows, although no significant effect was detected in colostrum or milk [22]. Differences in product formulation, sampling conditions, and analytical methods may account for the different colostrum responses. In weaned piglets, the increase in serum and duodenal 24,25-(OH)2-D3 without a corresponding increase in 1,25-(OH)2-D3 may reflect increased vitamin D turnover under homeostatic regulation. DBP remained unchanged across maternal and offspring samples, indicating that the changes in total vitamin D metabolites were not accompanied by detectable alterations in carrier abundance [23].
Despite the increase in 25-OH-D3 status, serum and colostrum calcium and phosphorus were unchanged, consistent with tight homeostatic regulation [24]. Piglet femoral calcium concentration increased by 6–14% with the 25-OH-D3 treatments, with the largest value in QV2, but bone length, phosphorus concentration, and ash were unaffected. Because total ALP rather than a bone-specific ALP isoenzyme was measured, the higher ALP activity should be interpreted only as supportive evidence of altered mineral or bone metabolic activity, not as direct proof of enhanced osteoblast activity, mineral deposition, skeletal development, or bone strength [25]. These observations are broadly consistent with reports that maternal 25-OH-D3 affects vitamin D status and selected indices of skeletal mineralization [11,26,27].
Maternal 25-OH-D3 supplementation did not affect litter size or birth weight. The significant growth response was confined to the first 14 days of life: QV2 increased litter weight on day 14 and litter weight gain from birth to day 14 by 9.8% relative to CON, whereas average piglet weight on day 14 showed only a tendency (p = 0.09). One potential contributing factor is that, at approximately 21 days of lactation, some clinically smaller piglets were cross-fostered by farm personnel to other sows within the same dietary treatment. Although restricting transfers to the same treatment prevented direct cross-treatment contamination, late-lactation cross-fostering altered the composition of individual litters and may have increased variation in litter and piglet. weights at weaning, thereby attenuating the apparent persistence of the day-14 response. Litter weight, average piglet weight, and litter weight gain to weaning did not differ among treatments. Previous studies have reported variable growth responses to maternal 25-OH-D3 supplementation [14,28,29]. The source-dependent responses observed here may relate to product-specific composition or formulation. Regulatory assessments likewise treat manufacturing process, composition, and stability as product-specific attributes [30]. Because epimer/isomer profiles, carrier composition, feed recovery, stability, and pharmacokinetics were not measured, the present study cannot identify the mechanism responsible for differences among QV1, QV2, and QV3.
Maternal 25-OH-D3 supplementation altered the overall redox profile in sows, colostrum, and piglets, as reflected by coordinated changes in MDA, SOD, GSH-Px, and CAT rather than by any single antioxidant enzyme; however, the magnitude and direction of individual responses were not uniform across sources or sampling points. This combined pattern of lipid peroxidation and antioxidant defense markers is compatible with improved redox balance in selected matrices. Oxidative stress is common during reproduction and has been associated with placental dysfunction and impaired offspring development [31,32,33]. In weaned piglets, 118 µg/kg 25-OH-D3 and doses of 50 or 75 µg/kg have also been associated with combined changes in antioxidant indices [34,35]. Direct ROS measurements and tissue oxidative damage endpoints were not assessed in the present study. Because the intervention began on day 90 of gestation and the basal diet met NRC [17] requirements, unchanged litter size and birth weight were not unexpected. These biochemical changes should therefore be interpreted as marker responses rather than evidence of improved reproductive performance, and the safety and long-term effects of supranutritional supplementation require further evaluation.
Maternal 25-OH-D3 supplementation produced source-dependent changes in systemic immune markers. In sow serum, the three 25-OH-D3 preparations generally reduced IL-1β, IL-6, TNF-α, and IFN-γ at farrowing and/or weaning, whereas increases in IL-10 were mainly observed at farrowing. In weaned piglets, QV2 and QV3 produced the most consistent reductions in circulating pro-inflammatory cytokines. These changes may be physiologically relevant because weaning is accompanied by increased intestinal expression of IL-1β, IL-6, and TNF-α in piglets [36]. Madsen et al. similarly showed that improving 25-OH-D3 status in piglets was associated with altered immune responses and potentially greater robustness during an Escherichia coli challenge, although their study did not demonstrate the same cytokine pattern observed here [37]. Mechanistically, 1,25-(OH)2-D3–VDR signaling can attenuate Toll-like receptor-mediated inflammation by limiting NF-κB-associated signaling and strengthening negative feedback regulation [38]. Intestinal epithelial VDR signaling has also been shown to reduce mucosal inflammation and epithelial injury in experimental models [39,40]. Collectively, the circulating and intestinal results support source-dependent immunomodulation by maternal 25-OH-D3 supplementation, although they should not be interpreted as direct evidence of reduced histological inflammation.
Maternal 25-OH-D3 supplementation also altered selected circulating and intestinal inflammatory markers. In piglet intestines, QV2 was associated with lower mRNA abundance of several inflammation-related genes, whereas QV1 and QV3 produced more selective transcriptional changes. These patterns are consistent with altered mucosal immune signaling [41,42,43] but do not directly demonstrate inhibition of intestinal inflammation because protein abundance, pathway activation, immune cell infiltration, and histopathological inflammation were not measured. The immune marker changes may have accompanied the early litter growth response, but the present design does not establish a causal relationship, and the absence of significant effects on weaning weight or total litter gain to weaning warrants cautious interpretation. Mechanistic studies are needed to determine whether differences in absorption, metabolism, or tissue signaling explain the source-dependent responses.
QV2 and QV3 increased jejunal and ileal villus height, and selected 25-OH-D3 treatments upregulated occludin and ZO-1 mRNA in a segment- and source-dependent manner. Villus architecture and tight-junction-related transcripts are relevant to absorptive and barrier biology [44,45], but intestinal permeability, nutrient absorption, and tight-junction protein abundance were not measured. Accordingly, these outcomes support changes in intestinal morphology and barrier-related gene expression but do not constitute direct evidence of enhanced intestinal barrier integrity or more efficient nutrient absorption.

Study Limitations

This study was conducted on one farm using one genotype and one supplemental dose and compared only three commercial preparations. The 25-OH-D3 content of each formulated premix was verified by HPLC; however, the chemical purity of the isolated active ingredients, epimer/isomer profiles, and pharmacokinetic characteristics were not independently determined. Therefore, the observed differences should be interpreted as product-specific responses among the preparations tested rather than as general differences between chemical and biosynthetic production routes. Vitamin D pharmacokinetics were not characterized by serial sampling. The biochemical and tissue subset comprised six independent sows or litters per treatment, cross-fostering occurred within treatment, and piglet sex was not controlled at terminal sampling. Direct ROS and tissue oxidative damage endpoints, inflammatory protein abundance, pathway activation, immune cell infiltration, histopathological inflammation, intestinal permeability, nutrient absorption, tight-junction proteins, bone strength, long-term reproductive outcomes, and economic return were not evaluated. These limitations restrict mechanistic interpretation and generalization of source-dependent effects.

5. Conclusions

Maternal supplementation with 25-OH-D3 from late gestation to weaning increased 25-OH-D3 status in sows and piglets and altered selected redox, inflammatory, femoral calcium, intestinal morphology, and barrier-related gene expression endpoints. QV2 increased litter weight gain from birth to day 14 and produced the largest femoral calcium response, but litter and average piglet weights at weaning were unchanged. QV2 and QV3 increased jejunal and ileal villus height, and selected treatments upregulated occludin and ZO-1 mRNA; these findings describe intestinal morphology and barrier-related gene expression but do not constitute direct evidence of enhanced intestinal barrier integrity. Under the conditions of the present study, QV2 showed the strongest responses for selected endpoints among the three preparations tested. Because the products were incompletely characterized and were evaluated at one dose under one production setting, the findings do not establish general superiority of biosynthesized products. Additional product characterization, dose–response studies, serial vitamin D metabolite and binding protein measurements, independent validation, long-term production studies, and economic evaluation are required before a source-specific practical recommendation can be made.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, B.X., F.L., J.B., X.Z. (Xiangfang Zeng) and C.C.; methodology, B.X., F.L., J.B., G.C. and S.L.; investigation, B.X., J.B., S.S., S.C., X.Z. (Xiangzhou Zeng), X.W. and Z.Z.; data curation, B.X., J.B., S.S., S.C., X.Z. (Xiangzhou Zeng), X.W. and Z.Z.; formal analysis, B.X., J.B. and Z.Z.; validation, G.C., X.Z. (Xiangfang Zeng) and S.L.; resources, F.L., G.C., P.Q. and Z.X.; visualization, B.X., J.B. and Z.Z.; project administration, F.L., P.Q., C.C. and Z.X.; supervision, X.Z. (Xiangfang Zeng), S.L. and C.C.; funding acquisition, Z.X.; writing—original draft preparation, B.X. and J.B.; writing—review and editing, all authors. B.X. and F.L. contributed equally to this work. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (32425052 and 32402774).

Institutional Review Board Statement

The animal study protocol was approved by the Animal Care and Use Committee of China Agricultural University (protocol code AW01705202-1-3; approval date: 10 July 2025).

Informed Consent Statement

Written informed consent has been obtained from the owner of the animals involved in this study. A blank unsigned copy of the written informed consent form is provided for the journal’s record; the signed original is retained by the research team.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available on request from the corresponding author.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Lei Wang and Youbo Zhu from Saneng Pig Farm (Shanxi, China) for their assistance during the sow trial.

Conflicts of Interest

Fengju Liu is employed by Beijing Hilink Biotechnology Co., Ltd., which provided the QV1 and QV2 preparations used in this study. Peng Qin is employed by Key Ingredients Biotechnology (Yichang) Co., Ltd., which provided the QV3 preparation. Both companies participated in the study design, data analysis, interpretation and discussion of the results, and manuscript preparation. Neither Fengju Liu nor Peng Qin, nor any of the other authors, holds patents, shares, stock options, royalty rights, or other direct commercial interests related to the products evaluated. The remaining authors declare no competing interests. All authors declare that there are no other relevant financial or non-financial competing interests to report.

Abbreviations

The following abbreviations are used in this manuscript:
ALPalkaline phosphatase
CATcatalase
DBPVitamin D-binding protein
GSH-Pxglutathione peroxidase
IFN-γinterferon-gamma
IgGImmunoglobulin G
IgMImmunoglobulin M
ILinterleukin
MDAmalondialdehyde
NF-κBNuclear factor kappa B
qRT-PCRquantitative real-time PCR
SODsuperoxide dismutase
TNF-αtumor necrosis factor-alpha
V/C ratiovillus height-to-crypt depth ratio
VDRVitamin D receptor
ZO-1Zonula occludens-1
1,25-(OH)2-D31,25-Dihydroxyvitamin D3
24,25-(OH)2-D324,25-Dihydroxyvitamin D3
25-OH-D325-hydroxyvitamin D3

References

  1. Pluym, L.M.; Van Nuffel, A.; Van Weyenberg, S.; Maes, D. Prevalence of lameness and claw lesions during different stages in the reproductive cycle of sows and the impact on reproduction results. Animal 2013, 7, 1174–1181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  2. Becker, L.L.; Gebhardt, J.T.; Tokach, M.D.; Woodworth, J.C.; Goodband, R.D.; DeRouchey, J.M. A review of calcium and phosphorus requirement estimates for gestating and lactating sows. Transl. Anim. Sci. 2024, 8, txae087. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  3. Heurtault, J.; Hiscocks, S.; Létourneau-Montminy, M.P.; Schlegel, P. Dynamics of bone mineralization in primiparous sows as a function of dietary phosphorus and calcium during lactation. Animal 2024, 18, 101130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  4. Kovacs, C.S.; Kronenberg, H.M. Maternal-fetal calcium and bone metabolism during pregnancy, puerperium, and lactation. Endocr. Rev. 1997, 18, 832–872. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  5. Winter, E.M.; Ireland, A.; Butterfield, N.C.; Haffner-Luntzer, M.; Horcajada, M.-N.; Veldhuis-Vlug, A.G.; Oei, L.; Colaianni, G.; Bonnet, N. Pregnancy and lactation, a challenge for the skeleton. Endocr. Connect. 2020, 9, R143–R157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  6. Khazai, N.; Judd, S.E.; Tangpricha, V. Calcium and vitamin D: Skeletal and extraskeletal health. Curr. Rheumatol. Rep. 2008, 10, 110–117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  7. Ceglia, L. Vitamin D and its role in skeletal muscle. Curr. Opin. Clin. Nutr. Metab. Care 2009, 12, 628–633. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  8. Christakos, S. Mechanism of action of 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3 on intestinal calcium absorption. Rev. Endocr. Metab. Disord. 2012, 13, 39–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  9. Kulda, V. [Vitamin D metabolism]. Vnitr. Lek. 2012, 58, 400–404. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  10. Christakos, S.; Dhawan, P.; Verstuyf, A.; Verlinden, L.; Carmeliet, G. Vitamin D: Metabolism, molecular mechanism of action, and pleiotropic effects. Physiol. Rev. 2016, 96, 365–408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  11. Lauridsen, C.; Halekoh, U.; Larsen, T.; Jensen, S.K. Reproductive performance and bone status markers of gilts and lactating sows supplemented with two different forms of vitamin D. J. Anim. Sci. 2010, 88, 202–213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  12. Hasan, M.; Oster, M.; Reyer, H.; Wimmers, K.; Fischer, D.-C. Efficacy of dietary vitamin D3 and 25(OH)D3 on reproductive capacities, growth performance, immunity and bone development in pigs. Br. J. Nutr. 2023, 130, 1298–1307. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  13. Zhang, L.; Hu, J.; Li, M.; Shang, Q.; Liu, S.; Piao, X. Maternal 25-hydroxycholecalciferol during lactation improves intestinal calcium absorption and bone properties in sow-suckling piglet pairs. J. Bone Miner. Metab. 2019, 37, 1083–1094. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  14. Zhang, L.; Li, M.; Shang, Q.; Hu, J.; Long, S.; Piao, X. Effects of maternal 25-hydroxycholecalciferol on nutrient digestibility, milk composition and fatty-acid profile of lactating sows and gut bacterial metabolites in the hindgut of suckling piglets. Arch. Anim. Nutr. 2019, 73, 271–286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  15. Zhang, L.; Yang, M.; Piao, X. Effects of 25-hydroxyvitamin D3 on growth performance, serum parameters, fecal microbiota, and metabolites in weaned piglets fed diets with low calcium and phosphorus. J. Sci. Food Agric. 2022, 102, 597–606. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  16. Zhou, X.; Zou, Y.; Xu, Y.; Zhang, Z.; Wu, Y.; Cao, J.; Qiu, B.; Qin, X.; Han, D.; Piao, X.; et al. Dietary supplementation of 25-hydroxyvitamin D3 improves growth performance, antioxidant capacity and immune function in weaned piglets. Antioxidants 2022, 11, 1750. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  17. National Research Council. Nutrient Requirements of Swine, 11th rev. ed.; National Academies Press: Washington, DC, USA, 2012. [Google Scholar]
  18. NY/T 3879-2021; Determination of 25-Hydroxyvitamin D3 in Feeds. China Agriculture Press: Beijing, China, 2021.
  19. GB/T 6438-2007; Determination of Crude Ash in Feeds. Standards Press of China: Beijing, China, 2007.
  20. Gray, R.W.; Ghazarian, J.G. Solubilization and reconstitution of kidney 25-hydroxyvitamin D3 1 alpha- and 24-hydroxylases from vitamin D-replete pigs. Biochem. J. 1989, 259, 561–568. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  21. Horst, R.L.; Littledike, E.T.; Gray, R.W.; Napoli, J.L. Impaired 24,25-dihydroxyvitamin D production in anephric human and pig. J. Clin. Investig. 1981, 67, 274–280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  22. Thayer, M.T.; Nelssen, J.L.; Langemeier, A.J.; Morton, J.M.; Gonzalez, J.M.; Kruger, S.R.; Ou, Z.; Makowski, A.J.; Bergstrom, J.R. The effects of maternal dietary supplementation of cholecalciferol (vitamin D3) and 25(OH)D3 on sow and progeny performance. Transl. Anim. Sci. 2019, 3, 692–708. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  23. Bouillon, R.; Van Assche, F.A.; Van Baelen, H.; Heyns, W.; De Moor, P. Influence of the vitamin D-binding protein on the serum concentration of 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3: Significance of the free 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3 concentration. J. Clin. Investig. 1981, 67, 589–596. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  24. Lütke-Dörhoff, M.; Schulz, J.; Westendarp, H.; Visscher, C.; Wilkens, M.R. Effects of maternal and offspring treatment with two dietary sources of vitamin D on mineral homeostasis, bone metabolism and locomotion of offspring fed protein- and phosphorus-reduced diets. Arch. Anim. Nutr. 2023, 77, 42–57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  25. Reiss, I.; Inderrieden, D.; Kruse, K. Bestimmung der knochenspezifischen alkalischen Phosphatase bei Störungen des Kalziumstoffwechsels im Kindesalter. Monatsschrift Kinderheilkd. 1996, 144, 885–890. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  26. Weber, G.M.; Witschi, A.-K.M.; Wenk, C.; Martens, H. Effects of dietary 25-hydroxycholecalciferol and cholecalciferol on blood vitamin D and mineral status, bone turnover, milk composition, and reproductive performance of sows. J. Anim. Sci. 2014, 92, 899–909. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  27. Okafor, P.C.J.; Homwong, N. Dietary 25-hydroxyvitamin D3 improved serum concentration level and alkaline phosphatase activity during lactation but had meager impact on post-farrowing reproductive performance in sows. Animals 2024, 14, 419. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  28. Coffey, J.D.; Hines, E.A.; Starkey, J.D.; Starkey, C.W.; Chung, T.K. Feeding 25-hydroxycholecalciferol improves gilt reproductive performance and fetal vitamin D status. J. Anim. Sci. 2012, 90, 3783–3788. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  29. Witschi, A.-K.M.; Liesegang, A.; Gebert, S.; Weber, G.M.; Wenk, C. Effect of source and quantity of dietary vitamin D in maternal and creep diets on bone metabolism and growth in piglets. J. Anim. Sci. 2011, 89, 1844–1852. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  30. EFSA FEEDAP Panel; Bampidis, V.; Azimonti, G.; Bastos, M.d.L.; Christensen, H.; Dusemund, B.; Durjava, M.F.; Kouba, M.; López-Alonso, M.; Puente, S.L.; et al. Safety and efficacy of a feed additive consisting of 25-hydroxycholecalciferol produced with Saccharomyces cerevisiae CBS 146008 for pigs and poultry for the renewal of its authorisation. EFSA J. 2023, 21, e08168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  31. Hussain, T.; Murtaza, G.; Metwally, E.; Kalhoro, D.H.; Kalhoro, M.S.; Rahu, B.A.; Sahito, R.G.A.; Yin, Y.; Yang, H.; Chughtai, M.I.; et al. The role of oxidative stress and antioxidant balance in pregnancy. Mediat. Inflamm. 2021, 2021, 9962860. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  32. Zhao, Y.; Flowers, W.L.; Saraiva, A.; Yeum, K.-J.; Kim, S.W. Effect of social ranks and gestation housing systems on oxidative stress status, reproductive performance, and immune status of sows. J. Anim. Sci. 2013, 91, 5848–5858. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  33. Yang, X.; Hu, R.; Shi, M.; Wang, L.; Yan, J.; Gong, J.; Zhang, Q.; He, J.; Wu, S. Placental malfunction, fetal survival and development caused by sow metabolic disorder: The impact of maternal oxidative stress. Antioxidants 2023, 12, 360. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  34. Yang, J.; Tian, G.; Chen, D.; Zheng, P.; Yu, J.; Mao, X.; He, J.; Luo, Y.; Luo, J.; Huang, Z.; et al. Effects of dietary 25-hydroxyvitamin D3 supplementation on growth performance, immune function and antioxidative capacity in weaned piglets. Arch. Anim. Nutr. 2019, 73, 44–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  35. Zhang, L.; Liu, S.; Piao, X. Dietary 25-hydroxycholecalciferol supplementation improves performance, immunity, antioxidant status, intestinal morphology, and bone quality in weaned piglets. J. Sci. Food Agric. 2021, 101, 2592–2600. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  36. Pié, S.; Lallès, J.P.; Blazy, F.; Laffitte, J.; Sève, B.; Oswald, I.P. Weaning is associated with an upregulation of expression of inflammatory cytokines in the intestine of piglets. J. Nutr. 2004, 134, 641–647. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  37. Madsen, P.A.; Etheve, S.; Heegaard, P.M.H.; Skovgaard, K.; Mary, A.L.; Litta, G.; Lauridsen, C. Influence of vitamin D metabolites on vitamin D status, immunity and gut health of piglets. Vet. Immunol. Immunopathol. 2023, 257, 110557. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  38. Chen, Y.; Liu, W.; Sun, T.; Huang, Y.; Wang, Y.; Deb, D.K.; Yoon, D.; Kong, J.; Thadhani, R.; Li, Y.C. 1,25-Dihydroxyvitamin D promotes negative feedback regulation of Toll-like receptor signaling via targeting microRNA-155–SOCS1 in macrophages. J. Immunol. 2013, 190, 3687–3695. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  39. Liu, W.; Chen, Y.; Golan, M.A.; Annunziata, M.L.; Du, J.; Dougherty, U.; Kong, J.; Musch, M.; Huang, Y.; Pekow, J.; et al. Intestinal epithelial vitamin D receptor signaling inhibits experimental colitis. J. Clin. Investig. 2013, 123, 3983–3996. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  40. Du, J.; Chen, Y.; Shi, Y.; Liu, T.; Cao, Y.; Tang, Y.; Ge, X.; Nie, H.; Zheng, C.; Li, Y.C. 1,25-Dihydroxyvitamin D protects intestinal epithelial barrier by regulating the myosin light chain kinase signaling pathway. Inflamm. Bowel Dis. 2015, 21, 2495–2506. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  41. Upadhaya, S.D.; Chung, T.K.; Jung, Y.J.; Kim, I.H. Dietary 25(OH)D3 supplementation to gestating and lactating sows and their progeny affects growth performance, carcass characteristics, blood profiles and myogenic regulatory factor-related gene expression in wean-finish pigs. Anim. Biosci. 2022, 35, 461–474. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  42. Sun, P.L.; Zhang, S. Correlations of 25-hydroxyvitamin D3 level in patients with ulcerative colitis with inflammation level, immunity and disease activity. Eur. Rev. Med. Pharmacol. Sci. 2018, 22, 5635–5639. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  43. Andrukhov, O.; Andrukhova, O.; Hulan, U.; Tang, Y.; Bantleon, H.-P.; Rausch-Fan, X. Both 25-hydroxyvitamin-D3 and 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin-D3 reduce inflammatory responses in human periodontal ligament cells. PLoS ONE 2014, 9, e90301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  44. Choudhury, R.; Middelkoop, A.; de Souza, J.G.; van Veen, L.A.; Gerrits, W.J.J.; Kemp, B.; Bolhuis, J.E.; Kleerebezem, M. Impact of early-life feeding on local intestinal microbiota and digestive system development in piglets. Sci. Rep. 2021, 11, 4213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  45. Gehart, H.; Clevers, H. Tales from the crypt: New insights into intestinal stem cells. Nat. Rev. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2019, 16, 19–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
Figure 1. Effects of maternal 25-OH-D3 supplementation from day 90 of gestation on jejunal and ileal morphology in weaning piglets. Control: Basal diet; VD3 group: The basal diet + 50 μg/kg vitamin D3; QV1, QV2, and QV3 groups: The basal diet + 50 μg/kg 25-OH-D3 from three different sources.
Figure 1. Effects of maternal 25-OH-D3 supplementation from day 90 of gestation on jejunal and ileal morphology in weaning piglets. Control: Basal diet; VD3 group: The basal diet + 50 μg/kg vitamin D3; QV1, QV2, and QV3 groups: The basal diet + 50 μg/kg 25-OH-D3 from three different sources.
Animals 16 02674 g001
Figure 2. Effects of maternal 25-OH-D3 supplementation from day 90 of gestation on gene expression in the jejunum and ileum of weaning piglets (n = 6). (A) Inflammatory cytokine gene expression in the jejunum; (B) Inflammatory cytokine gene expression in the ileum; (C) Tight junction protein gene expression in the jejunum; (D) Tight junction protein gene expression in the ileum. a,b,c,d Different superscript letters within a row indicate significant differences among treatments (p < 0.05). Control: Basal diet; VD3 group: The basal diet + 50 μg/kg vitamin D3; QV1, QV2, and QV3 groups: The basal diet + 50 μg/kg 25-OH-D3 from three different sources.
Figure 2. Effects of maternal 25-OH-D3 supplementation from day 90 of gestation on gene expression in the jejunum and ileum of weaning piglets (n = 6). (A) Inflammatory cytokine gene expression in the jejunum; (B) Inflammatory cytokine gene expression in the ileum; (C) Tight junction protein gene expression in the jejunum; (D) Tight junction protein gene expression in the ileum. a,b,c,d Different superscript letters within a row indicate significant differences among treatments (p < 0.05). Control: Basal diet; VD3 group: The basal diet + 50 μg/kg vitamin D3; QV1, QV2, and QV3 groups: The basal diet + 50 μg/kg 25-OH-D3 from three different sources.
Animals 16 02674 g002
Table 1. Ingredient and nutrient composition of the basal diets (% as fed).
Table 1. Ingredient and nutrient composition of the basal diets (% as fed).
GestationLactation
Ingredient (%)
Corn46.4958.99
Soybean meal5.0011.00
Wheat bran22.008.00
Wheat feed flour5.008.00
Expanded soybean-10.00
Rice bran10.00-
Rice bran meal8.00-
Salt0.50-
Soybean oil0.501.00
Limestone1.50-
Premix 11.001.00
Fish meal0.002.00
Modified starch0.010.01
Total100.00100.00
Nutrients
Crude protein (%)12.1816.00
Digestible energy (kcal/kg)30303334
Metabolizable energy (kcal/kg)28973157
Net energy (kcal/kg)22532455
Dry matter (%)87.1680.40
Crude fat (%)5.005.40
Crude fiber (%)4.583.04
Acid detergent fiber (%)5.953.83
Neutral detergent fiber (%)16.1910.42
Crude ash (%)6.035.68
Calcium (%)0.670.88
Total phosphorus (%)0.680.59
Available phosphorus (%)0.260.38
Salt (%)0.580.51
Lysine (%)0.651.03
Total Fiber (%)19.9414.06
Soluble Fiber (%)3.091.66
Insoluble Fiber (%)16.7512.26
Vitamin D3 (μg/kg)2525
1 Composition of 1 kg premix: Vitamin A, 130–175 kIU; vitamin D3, 2500 μg (100 kIU); Vitamin E, 500 IU; Vitamin K3, ≥45 mg; Vitamin B1, ≥50 mg; Vitamin B2, ≥150 mg; Vitamin B6, ≥100 mg; Vitamin B12, ≥0.5 mg; Niacin, 650 mg; Pantothenic acid, ≥450 mg; Folic acid, ≥80 mg; Biotin, ≥10 mg; Fe, 2.4~18 g; Cu, 0.2~0.62 g; Zn, 1~2.5 g; Mn, 0.5~2 g; I, 10~50 mg; Se, 5~12.5 mg; Calcium, 80 g; Phosphorus, 60 g; Choline chloride, ≥10 mg; Moisture, ≤10%.
Table 2. Primers (pig) used for qPCR.
Table 2. Primers (pig) used for qPCR.
GenesForward (5′–3′)Reverse (5′–3′)Product Size (bp)
GAPDHCGTCCCTGAGACACGATGGTCCCGATGCGGCCAAAT54
IL-10CGGCGCTGTCATCAATTTCTGCCCCTCTCTTGGAGCTTGCTA196
IL-1βCAACGTGCAGTCTATGGAGTGAGGTGCTGATGTACCAGTTG180
IL-6TACTGGCAGAAAACAACCTGGTACTAATCTGCACAGCCTC177
TNF-αTCCAATGGCAGAGTGGGATGAGCTGGTTGTCTTTCAGCTTCAC81
IFN-γGGATTTGCCCTGACCCTACTTCTCTGTGCTGACATCGCTC199
NF-κBTTTCACTTGTCCCGCTCTCCCGCCTTTGGAATTGCCTTGA178
ClaudinCTGTTTGCCCATGTTTGGCTTCCAGCCAATCTTCTCGTCA167
OccludinTATGAGACAGACTACACAACTGGCGGCGAGTCCATCATAGTCTCCAACCATCTTCTTGATGTG215
ZO-1AGGCGATGTTGTATTGAAGATAAATGTTTTTGCATCCGTCAATGACA217
Table 3. Effects of maternal 25-OH-D3 supplementation from day 90 of gestation on reproductive performance of sows and growth performance of piglets (n = 20).
Table 3. Effects of maternal 25-OH-D3 supplementation from day 90 of gestation on reproductive performance of sows and growth performance of piglets (n = 20).
ItemControlVD3QV1QV2QV3SEMp-Value
Sow performance
Litter size13.6814.1113.9114.2213.900.240.96
Number of born alive13.1413.5313.4513.7013.300.270.97
Number of stillbirths0.540.580.450.520.600.070.98
Number of healthy piglets12.7312.9012.9513.2612.700.290.97
Number of weak piglets0.410.630.500.430.600.070.80
Backfat loss (mm)2.522.802.832.572.880.060.19
Average birth weight (kg)1.411.341.391.461.410.020.21
Litter weight at birth (kg)18.4318.3018.5519.8518.650.360.73
Piglet performance
Litter weight on day 14 (kg)47.25 a47.59 a46.15 a51.58 b47.15 a0.610.04
Litter weight gain from birth to day 14 (kg)29.10 a29.29 a27.59 a31.94 b28.50 a0.33<0.01
Average weight on day 14 (kg)3.563.673.753.843.770.030.09
Litter weight at weaning (kg)93.2191.8392.1498.2792.301.070.25
Litter weight gain from birth to weaning (kg)75.6573.4673.3878.6373.421.000.36
Average weight at weaning (kg)7.207.237.347.537.390.050.22
a,b Different superscript letters within a row indicate significant differences among treatments (p < 0.05). Control: Basal diet; VD3 group: The basal diet + 50 μg/kg Vitamin D3; QV1, QV2, and QV3 groups: The basal diet + 50 μg/kg 25-OH-D3 from three different sources.
Table 4. Effects of maternal 25-OH-D3 supplementation from day 90 of gestation on chemical compositions of colostrum of sows (n = 6).
Table 4. Effects of maternal 25-OH-D3 supplementation from day 90 of gestation on chemical compositions of colostrum of sows (n = 6).
ItemControlVD3QV1QV2QV3SEMp-Value
Protein (%)12.6212.9812.9512.7213.050.170.49
Fat (%)2.512.352.532.672.860.040.69
Lactose (g/L)50.5446.9547.5450.0148.160.780.55
Total solids (%)22.1421.9022.4121.5721.840.230.90
IgG (mg/mL)40.4940.1939.6741.3940.730.320.94
IgM (mg/mL)3.133.193.273.323.050.040.23
25-OH-D3 (μg/L)12.73 a13.42 b14.21 c14.91 d13.80 bc0.16<0.01
Ca (mmol/L)4.894.954.914.844.800.070.99
P (mmol/L)1.291.191.271.251.300.030.22
ALP (U/L)70.54 a95.43 c78.52 b84.16 b81.95 b1.97<0.01
MDA (nmol/L)8.73 b9.42 b7.16 a7.11 a6.62 a0.25<0.01
SOD (U/L)1357.37 a1479.65 b1534.27 b1549.61 b1554.34 b21.36<0.01
GSH-Px (IU/L)120.00 ab117.56 a144.78 c145.96 c132.56 bc3.12<0.01
CAT (U/L)731.07 a753.83 a849.91 b909.37 b918.46 b20.02<0.01
IL-10 (ng/L)139.79 a145.16 b144.33 ab143.18 ab147.99 b0.870.03
IL-1β (ng/L)41.2441.9243.4041.1639.930.450.16
IL-6 (ng/L)663.11699.44658.80686.03654.368.770.44
TNF-α (ng/L)244.96 b225.75 ab203.78 a238.03 b233.35 b4.650.04
IFN-γ (ng/L)2187.922150.852219.692102.602132.2114.990.09
Abbreviations: IgG, immunoglobulin G; IgM, immunoglobulin M; 25-OH-D3: 25-Hydroxyvitamin D3; ALP: Alkaline phosphatase; MDA: Malondialdehyde; SOD: Superoxide dismutase; GSH-Px: Glutathione peroxidase; CAT: Catalase; IL-10: Interleukin-10; IL-1β: Interleukin-1 beta; IL-6: Interleukin-6; TNF-α: Tumor necrosis factor-alpha; IFN-γ: Interferon-gamma. Ca: calcium; P: phosphorus. Control: Basal diet; VD3 group: The basal diet + 50 μg/kg Vitamin D3; QV1, QV2, and QV3 groups: The basal diet + 50 μg/kg 25-OH-D3 from three different sources. a,b,c,d Different superscript letters within a row indicate significant differences among treatments (p < 0.05).
Table 5. Effects of maternal 25-OH-D3 supplementation from day 90 of gestation on serum statuses of vitamin D, Ca, and P in sows and piglets.
Table 5. Effects of maternal 25-OH-D3 supplementation from day 90 of gestation on serum statuses of vitamin D, Ca, and P in sows and piglets.
ItemControlVD3QV1QV2QV3SEMp-Value
Sows at farrowing (n = 6)
25-OH-D3 (μg/L)14.83 a14.71 a17.32 b17.26 b17.10 b0.26<0.01
ALP (U/L)67.24 a76.35 b90.53 c91.98 c89.52 c2.33<0.01
Ca (mmol/L)2.793.122.943.033.210.060.286
P (mmol/L)1.221.311.281.251.210.030.711
Sows at weaning (n = 6)
25-OH-D3 (μg/L)12.49 a13.22 b14.84 c14.36 c14.85 c0.21<0.01
ALP (U/L)77.54 a78.30 a99.73 c90.00 b100.21 c2.29<0.01
Ca (mmol/L)3.033.003.123.153.060.030.871
P (mmol/L)1.291.341.421.391.450.020.106
Piglets at weaning (n = 6)
25-OH-D3 (μg/L)14.22 a15.46 b18.07 c18.94 c17.80 d0.34<0.01
ALP (U/L)80.81 a87.05 a111.69 c98.04 b96.32 b2.26<0.01
Ca (mmol/L)3.103.123.183.273.150.040.775
P (mmol/L)1.361.451.431.491.440.020.303
Abbreviations: 25-OH-D3: 25-Hydroxyvitamin D3; ALP: Alkaline phosphatase; Ca: Blood calcium; P: Blood phosphorus. Control: Basal diet; VD3 group: The basal diet + 50 μg/kg Vitamin D3; QV1, QV2, and QV3 groups: The basal diet + 50 μg/kg 25-OH-D3 from three different sources. a,b,c,d Different superscript letters within a row indicate significant differences among treatments (p < 0.05).
Table 6. Effects of maternal vitamin D3 and 25-OH-D3 supplementation on downstream vitamin D metabolites and vitamin D-binding protein in sows and weaned piglets.
Table 6. Effects of maternal vitamin D3 and 25-OH-D3 supplementation on downstream vitamin D metabolites and vitamin D-binding protein in sows and weaned piglets.
ItemControlVD3QV1QV2QV3SEMp-Value
Sow serum at gestation day 90 (n = 6)
1,25-(OH)2-D3 (pg/mL)108.67106.9399.19100.25103.004.820.580
24,25-(OH)2-D3 (ng/mL)1.992.192.042.092.020.090.608
DBP (μg/mL)346.95308.13326.81339.00329.7315.980.514
Sow serum at farrowing (n = 6)
1,25-(OH)2-D3 (pg/mL)103.47 c109.92 bc120.01 ab129.78 a124.09 ab3.78<0.01
24,25-(OH)2-D3 (ng/mL)1.16 d1.35 c1.63 b2.00 a1.80 b0.05<0.01
DBP (μg/mL)648.91679.49590.94653.08622.9729.520.300
Sow colostrum (n = 6)
1,25-(OH)2-D3 (pg/mL)150.72 c159.95 bc179.01 ab186.93 a181.55 ab5.69<0.01
24,25-(OH)2-D3 (ng/mL)0.71 c0.76 c1.02 b1.19 a1.15 a0.03<0.01
DBP (μg/mL)529.97517.95491.39500.61498.1815.200.383
Weaned piglet serum (n = 6)
1,25-(OH)2-D3 (pg/mL)88.5499.80101.85103.6596.644.500.172
24,25-(OH)2-D3 (ng/mL)1.01 c1.07 c1.34 b1.63 a1.56 a0.05<0.01
DBP (μg/mL)363.77397.48377.59379.89423.1022.780.425
Piglet duodenal tissue (n = 6)
1,25-(OH)2-D3 (pg/g)105.04119.46120.86122.29111.755.270.139
24,25-(OH)2-D3 (ng/g)1.75 c1.86 c2.20 b2.62 a2.67 a0.06<0.001
DBP (μg/g)420.56416.96429.60381.09403.0322.510.596
Abbreviations: 1,25-(OH)2-D3: 1,25-Dihydroxyvitamin D3; 24,25-(OH)2-D3: 24,25-Dihydroxyvitamin D3; DBP: Vitamin D-binding protein. Control: Basal diet; VD3 group: The basal diet + 50 μg/kg Vitamin D3; QV1, QV2, and QV3 groups: The basal diet + 50 μg/kg 25-OH-D3 from three different sources. a,b,c,d Different superscript letters within a row indicate significant differences among treatments (p < 0.05).
Table 7. Effects of maternal 25-OH-D3 supplementation from day 90 of gestation on serum antioxidant status in sows and piglets.
Table 7. Effects of maternal 25-OH-D3 supplementation from day 90 of gestation on serum antioxidant status in sows and piglets.
ItemControlVD3QV1QV2QV3SEMp-Value
Sows at farrowing (n = 6)
MDA (nmol/L)10.46 c10.29 c8.09 ab8.33 b7.49 a0.26<0.01
SOD (U/L)1004.11 b852.74 a1237.22 c1313.50 c1336.74 c41.66<0.01
GSH-Px (IU/L)124.83 a127.12 a203.19 b213.54 bc218.24 c8.76<0.01
CAT (U/L)647.67 a677.81 a854.22 b884.26 b920.50 b24.97<0.01
Sows at weaning (n = 6)
MDA (nmol/L)9.13 b8.96 b6.26 a5.85 a5.98 a0.32<0.01
SOD (U/L)1007.60 a1012.91 a1347.12 b1406.83 b1391.33 b39.60<0.01
GSH-Px (IU/L)106.97 a112.29 a170.94 b182.43 b166.57 b6.31<0.01
CAT (U/L)545.73 a627.38 a705.33 b850.42 b746.48 b23.35<0.01
Piglets at weaning (n = 6)
MDA (nmol/L)7.36 b7.44 b6.49 a6.39 a6.19 a0.13<0.01
SOD (U/L)1373.18 a1358.45 a1569.23 b1650.50 b1613.54 b27.04<0.01
GSH-Px (IU/L)111.04 a124.47 b169.50 c172.60 c176.01 c5.39<0.01
CAT (U/L)521.88 a538.65 a709.45 b709.40 b769.53 b20.63<0.01
Abbreviations: MDA: Malondialdehyde; SOD: Superoxide dismutase; GSH-Px: Glutathione peroxidase; CAT: Catalase. Control: Basal diet; VD3 group: The basal diet + 50 μg/kg Vitamin D3; QV1, QV2, and QV3 groups: The basal diet + 50 μg/kg 25-OH-D3 from three different sources. a,b,c Different superscript letters within a row indicate significant differences among treatments (p < 0.05).
Table 8. Effects of maternal 25-OH-D3 supplementation from day 90 of gestation on serum levels of inflammatory cytokines in sows and piglets.
Table 8. Effects of maternal 25-OH-D3 supplementation from day 90 of gestation on serum levels of inflammatory cytokines in sows and piglets.
ItemControlVD3QV1QV2QV3SEMp-value
Sows at farrowing (n = 6)
IL-10 (ng/L)141.87 a150.31 ab165.05 c151.20 ab157.23 bc2.23<0.01
IL-1β (ng/L)41.40 d36.95 c28.11 a28.92 a33.59 b1.08<0.01
IL-6 (ng/L)574.49 b548.42 b362.09 a397.88 a371.78 a19.87<0.01
TNF-α (ng/L)279.25 b288.09 b260.34 b194.14 a180.58 a12.55<0.01
IFN-γ (ng/L)1880.05 d1771.85 c1473.01 a1617.76 b1717.07 bc31.90<0.01
Sows at weaning (n = 6)
IL-10 (ng/L)156.47166.17163.06162.78164.112.320.774
IL-1β (ng/L)41.51 c42.56 c29.43 a30.42 a38.27 b1.18<0.01
IL-6 (ng/L)669.66 c642.60 c448.55 a474.87 a550.15 b18.99<0.01
TNF-α (ng/L)242.71 c218.73 c182.69 b134.45 a138.12 a9.26<0.01
IFN-γ (ng/L)1697.13 b1856.16 c1673.31 b1381.40 a1363.49 a40.73<0.01
Piglets at weaning (n = 6)
IL-10 (ng/L)150.52151.49147.02154.55159.471.600.538
IL-1β (ng/L)31.42 c36.32 d29.55 c23.47 a26.61 b0.85<0.01
IL-6 (ng/L)582.99 c549.44 c416.95 b331.77 a319.62 a21.56<0.01
TNF-α (ng/L)289.94 b243.88 a218.32 a217.11 a239.76 a6.11<0.01
IFN-γ (ng/L)1974.62 c1802.18 b1786.49 b1392.37 a1366.73 a46.13<0.01
Abbreviations: IL-10: Interleukin-10; IL-1β: Interleukin-1 beta; IL-6: Interleukin-6; TNF-α: Tumor necrosis Factor-alpha; IFN-γ: Interferon-gamma. Control: Basal diet; VD3 group: The basal diet + 50 μg/kg Vitamin D3; QV1, QV2, and QV3 groups: The basal diet + 50 μg/kg 25-OH-D3 from three different sources. a,b,c,d Different superscript letters within a row indicate significant differences among treatments (p < 0.05).
Table 9. Effects of maternal 25-OH-D3 supplementation from day 90 of gestation on bone length and Ca and P contents in weaning piglets (n = 6).
Table 9. Effects of maternal 25-OH-D3 supplementation from day 90 of gestation on bone length and Ca and P contents in weaning piglets (n = 6).
ItemControlVD3QV1QV2QV3SEMp-Value
Average piglet weight (kg)8.378.508.438.338.470.070.95
Femur length (cm)8.228.428.438.588.330.110.91
Tibia length (cm)7.478.037.787.857.850.100.57
Ca (g/kg)160.89 a157.90 a171.05 b184.04 c176.43 bc2.17<0.01
P (%)5.845.695.955.905.760.040.19
Ash (%)39.0340.9042.6342.2041.090.510.21
Abbreviations: Ca: Bone calcium; P: Bone phosphorus. Control: Basal diet; VD3 group: The basal diet + 50 μg/kg Vitamin D3; QV1, QV2, and QV3 groups: The basal diet + 50 μg/kg 25-OH-D3 from three different sources. a,b,c Different superscript letters within a row indicate significant differences among treatments (p < 0.05).
Table 10. Effects of maternal 25-OH-D3 supplementation from day 90 of gestation on intestinal villus characters in weaning piglets (n = 6).
Table 10. Effects of maternal 25-OH-D3 supplementation from day 90 of gestation on intestinal villus characters in weaning piglets (n = 6).
ItemControlVD3QV1QV2QV3SEMp-Value
Jejunum
Villus height (μm)274.41 a383.15 b344.39 ab521.74 c539.22 c29.39<0.01
Crypt depth (μm)244.17319.84265.42207.93218.2219.680.437
V/C ratio1.12 a1.32 a1.37 a2.49 b2.59 b0.19<0.01
Ileum
Villus height (μm)289.05 ab221.71 a364.31 bc454.57 c424.22 c26.26<0.01
Crypt depth (μm)214.85134.57200.03183.12191.2615.250.588
V/C ratio1.421.681.842.732.320.170.07
Abbreviations: V/C ratio: Villus height/Crypt depth ratio; Control: Basal diet; VD3 group: The basal diet + 50 μg/kg Vitamin D3; QV1, QV2, and QV3 groups: The basal diet + 50 μg/kg 25-OH-D3 from three different sources. a,b,c Different superscript letters within a row indicate significant differences among treatments (p < 0.05).
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Xue, B.; Liu, F.; Bao, J.; Shi, S.; Cai, S.; Zeng, X.; Wang, X.; Zhu, Z.; Chu, G.; Zeng, X.; et al. Comparative Evaluation of Chemically Synthesized and Biosynthesized 25-Hydroxyvitamin D3 Supplementation in Sows During Late Gestation and Lactation. Animals 2026, 16, 2674. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani16172674

AMA Style

Xue B, Liu F, Bao J, Shi S, Cai S, Zeng X, Wang X, Zhu Z, Chu G, Zeng X, et al. Comparative Evaluation of Chemically Synthesized and Biosynthesized 25-Hydroxyvitamin D3 Supplementation in Sows During Late Gestation and Lactation. Animals. 2026; 16(17):2674. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani16172674

Chicago/Turabian Style

Xue, Bangxin, Fengju Liu, Jiale Bao, Shengjie Shi, Shuang Cai, Xiangzhou Zeng, Xinyu Wang, Zhekun Zhu, Guiyan Chu, Xiangfang Zeng, and et al. 2026. "Comparative Evaluation of Chemically Synthesized and Biosynthesized 25-Hydroxyvitamin D3 Supplementation in Sows During Late Gestation and Lactation" Animals 16, no. 17: 2674. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani16172674

APA Style

Xue, B., Liu, F., Bao, J., Shi, S., Cai, S., Zeng, X., Wang, X., Zhu, Z., Chu, G., Zeng, X., Liu, S., Qin, P., Cai, C., & Xue, Z. (2026). Comparative Evaluation of Chemically Synthesized and Biosynthesized 25-Hydroxyvitamin D3 Supplementation in Sows During Late Gestation and Lactation. Animals, 16(17), 2674. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani16172674

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop