Next Article in Journal
Estimation of the Availability and Effect of Some European Agro-Industrial By-Products to Reduce the Carbon Footprint of Sheep and Goat Diets
Previous Article in Journal
An Ecological Framework for Interpreting the Canine Gut Microbiome
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
This is an early access version, the complete PDF, HTML, and XML versions will be available soon.
Article

Meat Quality Characteristics of Mongolian Horses in Inner Mongolia: Regional Superiority and Transcriptomic Insights into Tenderness Differences Between Muscular Locations

1
Equus Research Center, College of Animal Science, Inner Mongolia Agricultural University, Hohhot 010000, China
2
Rural Revitalization Research Institute, Inner Mongolia Agricultural University, Hohhot 010018, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Animals 2026, 16(12), 1788; https://doi.org/10.3390/ani16121788 (registering DOI)
Submission received: 11 May 2026 / Revised: 6 June 2026 / Accepted: 8 June 2026 / Published: 9 June 2026
(This article belongs to the Section Animal Products)

Simple Summary

Horse meat is becoming a popular healthy protein source. In this study, we examined meat from Mongolian horses, a hardy breed known for good meat quality. Our goal was to understand what affects meat quality, especially tenderness. First, we compared meat from three regions: two in Mongolia and one in Inner Mongolia, China. Inner Mongolian meat had higher levels of healthy fats and minerals (e.g., iron and selenium). Next, we focused on Inner Mongolian horses and compared forelimb and hindlimb meat. Forelimb meat was more tender, had better color, and lost less water during cooking. To explore the underlying reasons, transcriptome analysis revealed several genes involved in fat storage and muscle fiber type that were significantly upregulated in the tender forelimb meat, which likely contributed to the improved tenderness. Our findings can help select for better meat quality, benefiting both the industry and consumers who want tasty, nutritious food.

Abstract

Horse meat is a high-quality protein source. A total of 50 two-year-old male horses with similar body weights (300 ± 50 kg) were used: 30 for regional comparison (10 each from Bulgan province region of Mongolia (BPM), Tuv province region of Mongolia (TPM), and Inner Mongolia region of China (IMC)) and an additional 20 from the IMC region for muscle-site analysis. To elucidate the molecular mechanisms underlying regional and muscle-site differences in the meat quality of Mongolian horses, with particular emphasis on tenderness, this study analyzed chemical composition, minerals, fatty acids, and transcriptomes. Results showed that Mongolian horses from the Inner Mongolia region of China (IMC) had the highest contents of Se, C17:1, C18:2n6c, C18:3n3, ∑PUFA, PUFA/SFA, ∑n-3PUFA, ∑n-6PUFA (p < 0.05), and Fe (p < 0.01), and the lowest levels of C15:0 (p < 0.01) and C16:0 (p < 0.05). The Mongolian horses from the Tuv province region of Mongolia (TPM) had the highest Ca content (p < 0.05). The Mongolian horses from the Bulgan province region of Mongolia (BPM) had the highest ∑SFA (p < 0.01). The forelimb (FL) had the highest a*45min, b*45min (p < 0.01), Fe, Zn, and C17:1 (p < 0.05), and the lowest shear force and drip loss (p < 0.01). The HD had the highest pH45min and cooking loss (p < 0.01). The hindlimb (HD) increased the L*45min compared with the FL (p < 0.01). Transcriptomic analysis identified 513 differentially expressed genes (DEGs) between FL and HD, including SLC16A7, GPAM, FABP3, and TNNC1. KEGG enrichment analysis revealed that these DEGs were significantly enriched in the cGMP-PKG signaling pathway, glycerophospholipid metabolism, and PPAR signaling pathway. In summary, this study demonstrated that among Mongolian horses from three different regions, IMC horses exhibited superior meat quality and flavor characteristics, and the FL of IMC horses showed significantly better meat quality than other anatomical sites. Transcriptomic analysis identified a set of candidate genes related to meat quality and lipid metabolism, including SLC16A7, GPAM, FABP3, and TNNC1, providing a scientific basis for further understanding of muscle-specific molecular mechanisms in Mongolian horses. Furthermore, the observed differences in physicochemical and nutritional properties across regions and muscle sites established a systematic foundation for quality grading, targeted nutritional utilization, and processing optimization of Mongolian horse meat.
Keywords: Mongolian horses; meat quality; muscle location; fatty acids; transcriptome Mongolian horses; meat quality; muscle location; fatty acids; transcriptome

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Liu, Y.; Wang, X.; Tan, G.; Dugarjaviina, M.; Zhang, X. Meat Quality Characteristics of Mongolian Horses in Inner Mongolia: Regional Superiority and Transcriptomic Insights into Tenderness Differences Between Muscular Locations. Animals 2026, 16, 1788. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani16121788

AMA Style

Liu Y, Wang X, Tan G, Dugarjaviina M, Zhang X. Meat Quality Characteristics of Mongolian Horses in Inner Mongolia: Regional Superiority and Transcriptomic Insights into Tenderness Differences Between Muscular Locations. Animals. 2026; 16(12):1788. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani16121788

Chicago/Turabian Style

Liu, Yu, Xuejiao Wang, Gesi Tan, Manglai Dugarjaviina, and Xinzhuang Zhang. 2026. "Meat Quality Characteristics of Mongolian Horses in Inner Mongolia: Regional Superiority and Transcriptomic Insights into Tenderness Differences Between Muscular Locations" Animals 16, no. 12: 1788. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani16121788

APA Style

Liu, Y., Wang, X., Tan, G., Dugarjaviina, M., & Zhang, X. (2026). Meat Quality Characteristics of Mongolian Horses in Inner Mongolia: Regional Superiority and Transcriptomic Insights into Tenderness Differences Between Muscular Locations. Animals, 16(12), 1788. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani16121788

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop