Dietary Yellow Bells (Tecoma stans) Flower Enhances Gut Health, Fillet Quality, Hematological Indices, and Whole-Body Composition in Nile Tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus)
Simple Summary
Abstract
1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Nutritional Composition
2.1.1. Dried YB Flower Preparation
2.1.2. Proximate Chemical Composition
2.1.3. Total Carotenoid Content
2.1.4. In Vitro Digestibility
2.2. Production of Experimental Diets
2.3. Fish Feeding Trial
2.4. Specimen Collection and Biometric Measurements
2.5. Color Parameters
2.6. Gut Functionality
2.6.1. Digestive Enzyme Activities
2.6.2. Radical Scavenging Activity
2.7. Determination of Fillet Quality
2.7.1. Myosin and Actin Contents
2.7.2. RNA and Protein Concentrations
2.8. Determination of Hematological Parameters
2.9. Determination of Whole-Body Composition
2.10. Statistical Analysis
3. Results
3.1. Nutritional Value of YB and Marigold Flowers and Proximate Composition of Experimental Diets
3.2. Survival, Growth, and Feed Utilization
3.3. Skin and Fillet Coloration
3.4. Digestive Enzyme Activities and Gastrointestinal Radical Scavenging Activity
3.5. Fillet Quality
3.6. Hematological Parameters
3.7. Whole-Body Composition
4. Discussion
5. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Rana, N.; Singh, S.; Dhakad, A.K.; Dhatt, K.K. Coding phenological growth stages of yellow bells (Tecoma stans (L.) Juss. ex Kunth) based on BBCH scale and its implications for urban greening. Curr. Plant Biol. 2023, 34, 100284. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Singh, S.; Miller, C.T.; Singh, P.; Sharma, R.; Rana, N.; Dhakad, A.K.; Dubey, R.K. A comprehensive review on ecology, life cycle and use of Tecoma stans (Bignoneaceae). Bot. Stud. 2024, 65, 6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Anand, M.; Basavaraju, R. A review on phytochemistry and pharmacological uses of Tecoma stans (L.) Juss. ex Kunth. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2021, 265, 113270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Gonçalves, T.P.R.; Parreira, A.G.; dos Santos Zanuncio, V.S.; de Souza Farias, K.; da Silva, D.B.; dos Santos Lima, L.A.R. Antibacterial and antioxidant properties of flowers from Tecoma stans (L.) Juss. ex Kunth (Bignoniaceae). S. Afr. J. Bot. 2022, 144, 156–165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Singh, A.; Nagori, B.P.; Mathur, K. Tecoma stans: An important medicinal plant. Int. J. Pharm. Erud. 2013, 3, 13–21. [Google Scholar]
- Anburaj, G.; Marimuthu, M.; Rajasudha, V.; Manikandan, R. Phytochemical screening and GC-MS analysis of ethanolic extract of Tecoma stans (Family: Bignoniaceae) yellow bell flowers. J. Pharm. Phytochem. 2016, 5, 172–175. [Google Scholar]
- Taher, M.A.H.; Dawood, D.H.; Sanad, M.I.; Hassan, R.A. Searching for anti-hyperglycemic phytomolecules of Tecoma stans. Eur. J. Chem. 2016, 7, 397–404. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Robles-Zepeda, R.E.; Velázquez-Contreras, C.A.; Garibay-Escobar, A.; Gálvez-Ruiz, J.C.; Ruiz-Bustos, E. Antimicrobial activity of northwestern Mexican plants against Helicobacter pylori. J. Med. Food 2011, 14, 1280–1283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Anburaj, G.; Marimuthu, M.; Rajasudha, V.; Manikandan, R. In vitro anti-cancer activity Tecoma stans against human breast cancer yellow elder (Tecoma stans). J. Pharm. Phytochem. 2016, 5, 331–334. [Google Scholar]
- Khattab, A.Y.; Awad, N.E.; Fadeel, D.A.; Fadel, M. Dual antineoplastic and photodynamic effects of methanolic extract of Tecoma stans yellow flowers for cancer treatment. J. Herbmed. Pharmacol. 2023, 12, 432–441. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Lavudi, K.; Harika, G.V.S.; Thirunavukarasou, A. Green synthesis of Tecoma stans flower and leaf extracts: Characterization and anti-proliferative activity in colorectal cancer cell lines. Lett. Appl. Nano Bio Sci. 2022, 12, 61. [Google Scholar]
- Bakr, R.O.; Fayed, M.A.A.; Salem, M.A.; Hussein, A.S. Tecoma stans: Alkaloid profile and antimicrobial activity. J. Pharm. Bioallied Sci. 2019, 11, 341–347. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Baruah, S.K.; Norouzitallab, P.; Debnath, D.; Pal, A.K.; Sahu, N.P. Organic acids as non-antiobiotic nutraceuticals in fish and prawn feed. Aquac. Health Int. 2008, 12, 4–6. [Google Scholar]
- Dada, A. Effects of herbal growth promoter feed additive in fish meal on the performance of Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus (L.)). Egypt. Acad. J. Biol. Sci. 2012, 4, 111–117. [Google Scholar]
- Lević, J.; Siniša, M.; Djuragić, O.; Slavica, S. Herbs and organic acids as an alternative for antibiotic-growth-promoters. Arch. Zootech. 2008, 11, 5–11. [Google Scholar]
- Lê, H.V.; Pham, L.V.B.; Vo, B.N.H.; Le, N.T.H.; Nguyen, Q.H.; Luu, P.V.; Huynh, T.C.; Nguyen, K.D.; Nguyen, N.H. Novel application of orange marigold flower petal (Tagetes erecta L.) as a dietary supplement to improve skin redness of Koi carps (Cyprinus carpio L.). VNUHCM J. Eng. Technol. 2024, 7, 2167–2176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Bhagchand Chhaba, B.C.; Suman Karmakar, S.K.; Das, S.A.; Rout, S.K. Ocimum sanctum Linn. (tulsi) and Tagetes erecta (marigold) as herbal dietary additives promoting growth and biochemical parameters of fish. J. Exp. Zool. India 2019, 22, 723–729. [Google Scholar]
- Yeşilayer, N.; Mutlu, G.; Yıldırım, A. Effect of nettle (Urtica spp.), marigold (Tagetes erecta), alfalfa (Medicago sativa) extracts and synthetic xanthophyll (zeaxanthin) carotenoid supplementations into diets on skin pigmentation and growth parameters of electric yellow cichlid (Labidochromis caeruleus). Aquaculture 2020, 520, 734964. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Tesfaye, G.; Curto, M.; Meulenbroek, P.; Englmaier, G.K.; Tibihika, P.D.; Alemayehu, E.; Getahun, A.; Meimberg, H. Genetic diversity of Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus) populations in Ethiopia: Insights from nuclear DNA microsatellites and implications for conservation. BMC Ecol. Evol. 2021, 21, 113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Trewavas, E. Tilapiine Fishes of the Genera Sarotherodon, Oreochromis and Danakilia; Dorset Press: London, UK, 1983; pp. 1–40. [Google Scholar]
- Webster, C.D.; Lim, C. Tilapia: Biology, Culture, and Nutrition; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2006; pp. 1–49. [Google Scholar]
- Ashraf, Y.; Shalaby, S.M.; Elsheikh, E.A.; El-Desoki, A.A.; El Basuini, M.F.; Ahmed-Farid, O.A.H.; Abdel-Aziz, M.F. Assessing chamomile and marjoram meals as feed additives on growth indices and haematological parameters of Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus) reared under biofloc system. Sci. Afr. 2023, 21, e01755. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Ashraf, Y.; Shalaby, S.M.; Salama, A.N.; Sabra, A.R.A.; Younis, E.M.; Abdelwarith, A.A.; Davies, S.J.; Abdel Rahman, A.N.; Abdel-Aziz, M.F. Effects of dietary β-mannanase (Hemicell®) and Lavandula angustifolia on Oreochromis niloticus fed a low level of dietary protein: Growth, digestive enzymes, and hemato-biochemical indices. Aquac. Rep. 2023, 30, 101604. [Google Scholar]
- Phinyo, M.; Sangarun, P.; Wangkahart, E.; Sujipuri, K. Effects of banana flower powder (Musa sp.) supplementation on growth performance, whole body composition, antioxidant and immune responses, gene expression and liver histology in Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus). Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 2024, 308, 115882. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- AOAC. Official Methods of Analysis of AOAC International, 15th ed.; Association of Official Analytical Chemists: Arlington, VA, USA, 1990; pp. 223–225. [Google Scholar]
- Thongprajukaew, K.; Kovitvadhi, S.; Kovitvadhi, U.; Rungruangsak-Torrissen, K. Pigment deposition and in vitro screening of natural pigment sources for enhancing pigmentation in male Siamese fighting fish (Betta splendens Regan, 1910). Aquac. Res. 2014, 45, 709–719. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Foss, P.; Storebakken, T.; Schiedt, K.; Liaaen-Jensen, S.; Austreng, E.; Streiff, K. Carotenoids in diets for salmonids: I. Pigmentation of rainbow trout with the individual optical isomers of astaxanthin in comparison with canthaxanthin. Aquaculture 1984, 41, 213–226. [Google Scholar]
- Thongprajukaew, K.; Kovitvadhi, U.; Kovitvadhi, S.; Somsueb, P.; Rungruangsak-Torrissen, K. Effects of different modified diets on growth, digestive enzyme activities and muscle compositions in juvenile Siamese fighting fish (Betta splendens Regan, 1910). Aquaculture 2011, 322–323, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Boyd, C.E.; Tucker, C.S. Water Quality and Pond Soil Analyses for Aquaculture; Auburn University: Auburn, AL, USA, 1992; p. 183. [Google Scholar]
- Lowry, O.H.; Rosenbrough, N.J.; Farr, A.L.; Randall, R.J. Protein measurement with the Folin phenol reagent. J. Biol. Chem. 1951, 193, 265–275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Hahor, W.; Thongprajukaew, K.; Yoonram, K.; Rodjaroen, S. Gastrointestinal functionality of aquatic animal (Oreochromis niloticus) carcass in water allows estimating time of death. J. Forensic Sci. 2016, 61, 1647–1655. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Areekijseree, M.; Engkagul, A.; Kovitvadhi, U.; Thongpan, A.; Mingmuang, M.; Pakkong, P.; Rungruangsak-Torrissen, K. Temperature and pH characteristics of amylase and proteinase of adult freshwater pearl mussel, Hyriopsis (Hyriopsis) bialatus Simpson 1900. Aquaculture 2004, 234, 575–587. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Mendels, M.; Weber, J. The product of cellulose in cellulase and their application. Adv. Chem. Ser. 1969, 95, 391–413. [Google Scholar]
- Worthington, V. Worthington Enzyme Manual. Enzymes and Related Biochemicals; Worthington Chemical: New Jersey, NJ, USA, 1993; p. 399. [Google Scholar]
- Rungruangsak-Torrissen, K.; Moss, R.; Andresen, L.H.; Berg, A.; Waagbø, R. Different expressions of trypsin and chymotrypsin in relation to growth in Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar L.). Fish Physiol. Biochem. 2006, 32, 7–23. [Google Scholar]
- Thongprajukaew, K.; Rodjaroen, S.; Yoonram, K.; Sornthong, P.; Hutcha, N.; Tantikitti, C.; Kovitvadhi, U. Effects of dietary modified palm kernel meal on growth, feed utilization, radical scavenging activity, carcass composition and muscle quality in sex reversed Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus). Aquaculture 2015, 439, 45–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Re, R.; Pellegrini, N.; Proteggente, A.; Pannala, A.; Yang, M.; Rice-Evans, C. Antioxidant activity applying an improved ABTS radical cation decolorization assay. Free Radic. Biol. Med. 1999, 26, 1231–1237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Rungruangsak-Torrissen, K. Digestive efficiency, growth and qualities of muscle and oocyte in Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar L.) fed on diets with krill meal as an alternative protein source. J. Food Biochem. 2007, 31, 509–540. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Larsen, H.N.; Snieszko, S.F. Comparison of various methods of determination of hemoglobin in trout blood. Prog. Fish-Cult. 1961, 23, 8–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Larsen, H.N.; Snieszko, S.F. Modification of the microhematocrit technique with trout blood. Trans. Amer. Fish. Soc. 1961, 90, 139–142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Demers, N.E.; Bayne, C.J. The immediate effects of stress on hormones and plasma lysozyme in rainbow trout. Dev. Comp. Immunol. 1997, 21, 363–373. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Shabab, S.; Gholamnezhad, Z.; Mahmoudabady, M. Protective effects of medicinal plant against diabetes induced cardiac disorder: A review. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2021, 265, 113328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Ghafarifarsani, H.; Hoseinifar, S.H.; Molayemraftar, T.; Raeeszadeh, M.; Van Doan, H. Pot marigold (Calendula officinalis) powder in rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) feed: Effects on growth, immunity, and Yersinia ruckeri resistance. Aquac. Nutr. 2023, 2023, 7785722. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Pailan, G.H.; Sardar, P.; Mahapatra, B.K. Marigold petal meal: A natural carotenoid source for pigmentation in swordtail (Xiphophorus helleri). Anim. Nutr. Feed Technol. 2015, 15, 417–425. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Norin, T.; Clark, T.D. Fish face a trade-off between ‘eating big’ for growth efficiency and ‘eating small’ to retain aerobic capacity. Biol. Lett. 2017, 13, 20170298. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Wichayapreechar, P.; Prasansuklab, A.; Charoongchit, P.; Charoenjittichai, R. The potential of Tecoma stans (Linn.) flower extract as a natural antioxidant and anti-aging agent for skin care products. Cosmetics 2024, 11, 214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Bojarski, B.; Witeska, M.; Kondera, E. Blood biochemical biomarkers in fish toxicology—A review. Animals 2025, 15, 965. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Docan, A.; Grecu, I.; Dediu, L. Use of hematological parameters as assessment tools in fish health status. J. Agroaliment. Proc. Technol. 2018, 24, 317–324. [Google Scholar]
- Ferri, J.; Matić-Skoko, S.; Čož-Rakovac, R.; Strunjak-Perović, I.; Beer Ljubić, B.; Topić Popović, N. Assessment of fish health: Seasonal variations in blood parameters of the widely spread Mediterranean Scorpaenid species, Scorpaena porcus. Appl. Sci. 2022, 12, 4106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Mazini, B.S.M.; Martins, G.P.; Menezes, L.L.C.; Guimarães, I.G. Nutritional feed additives reduce the adverse effects of transport stress in the immune system of Tambaqui (Colossoma macropomum). Fish Shellfish Immunol. Rep. 2022, 3, 100051. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Reshi, Q.M.; Ahmed, I.; Al-Anazi, K.M.; Farah, M.A. Indexing hematological and serum biochemical reference intervals of Himalayan snow trout, Schizothorax esocinus to instrument in health assessment. Front. Physiol. 2023, 14, 989442. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Seibel, H.; Baßmann, B.; Rebl, A. Blood will tell: What hematological analyses can reveal about fish welfare. Front. Vet. Sci. 2021, 8, 616955. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Witeska, M.; Kondera, E.; Bojarski, B. Hematological and hematopoietic analysis in fish toxicology—A review. Animals 2023, 13, 2625. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Dawood, M.A.O.; Koshio, S.; Ishikawa, M.; Yokoyama, S. Immune responses and stress resistance in red sea bream, Pagrus major, after oral administration of heat-killed Lactobacillus plantarum and vitamin C. Fish Shellfish Immunol. 2016, 54, 266–275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Alfattah, M.A. Bio-beneficial spectrum of Tecoma stans flower extract in vitro for fighting prostate and ovarian cancers with its anti-diabetic and antioxidant activities. BioResources 2024, 19, 4763–4781. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Mansoori, A.; Allaf Noveirian, H.; Hoseinifar, S.H.; Sajjadi, M.; Ashouri, G.; Imperatore, R.; Paolucci, M. Polyphenol-rich extracts enhance growth, immune function, and antioxidant defense in juvenile rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss). Front. Nutr. 2024, 11, 1487209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Periago, M.J.; Ayala, M.D.; López-Albors, O.; Abdel, I.; Martínez, C.; García-Alcázar, A.; Ros, G.; Gil, F. Muscle cellularity and flesh quality of wild and farmed sea bass, Dicentrarchus labrax L. Aquaculture 2005, 249, 175–188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Young, A.J.; Lowe, G.M. Antioxidant and prooxidant properties of carotenoids. Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 2001, 385, 20–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Li, Q.; Huang, Y.; Zhang, X.; Zou, C.; Lin, L. Improvement of muscle quality in tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus) with dietary faba bean (Vicia faba L.). Front. Nutr. 2023, 10, 1153323. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Orzuna-Orzuna, J.F.; Lara-Bueno, A.; Mendoza-García, P.G.; Mendoza-Martínez, G.D.; Sánchez-Torres-Esqueda, M.T.; Álvarez-González, C.A. Growth performance, antioxidant status, intestinal morphology, and body composition of Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus) supplemented with essential oils: A meta-analysis. Res. Vet. Sci. 2024, 169, 105353. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Chotolli, A.P.; da Fonseca, V.E.; Bermejo-Poza, R.; Ferraz, I.G.; de Souza, L.C.C.; Brasil, M.L.; Santana, R.F.; Games, I.M.M.; Ferraz, M.C.; Theophilo, G.; et al. Dietary fruit by-products improve the physiological status of Nile tilapias (Oreochromis niloticus) and the quality of their meat. Antioxidants 2023, 12, 1607. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Ahmed, M.M.; Mohammed, A.T.; Farag, M.R.; Hassan, M.A.; Mawed, S.A.; Alagawany, M.; Zizzadoro, C.; Di Cerbo, A.; Abdel-Latif, H.M.R. Dietary supplementation of Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus) with Panax ginseng essential oil: Positive impact on animal health and productive performance, and mitigating effects on atrazine-induced toxicity. Front. Mar. Sci. 2022, 9, 920057. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Poolsawat, L.; Moolkum, P.; He, M.; Songserm, P.; Dong, X. Efficacy of phytogenic extracts on growth performance, nutrient utilization, immune response, and disease resistance in Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus). Aquac. Rep. 2022, 23, 101034. [Google Scholar]
- Concepción-Brindis, A.; Jiménez-Ruíz, E.I.; Sumaya-Martínez, M.T.; Rincones-López, J.E.; Sánchez-Herrera, L.M.; Peraza-Gómez, V.; Enedina-Medina-Carrillo, R.; Spanopoulos-Hernández, M. Evaluation of an antioxidant diet for tilapia Oreochromis niloticus with mango and roselle by-products inclusion. Biotecnia 2022, 24, 69–76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Abdel-Tawwab, M.; Khalil, R.H.; Abdel-Razek, N.; Shukry, M.; Ahmed, H.A.; Abdel-Latif, H.M.R. Dietary synbiotic supplementation improved growth performance, feed utilization, intestinal histomorphology, antioxidant status, and resistance of Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus) reared under suboptimal temperature. Aquac. Rep. 2024, 36, 102091. [Google Scholar]


| Component | Yellow Bells | Marigold |
|---|---|---|
| Chemical composition | ||
| Crude protein (%) | 13.2 | 19.9 |
| Crude lipid (%) | 4.77 | 8.41 |
| Crude fiber (%) | 9.87 | 11.2 |
| Ash (%) | 4.28 | 6.41 |
| Nitrogen-free extract (%) | 65.6 | 41.2 |
| Carotenoid (mg/g) | 1.18 | 1.40 |
| In vitro digestibility | ||
| Protein (mmol DL-alanine equivalent/g) | 24.7 ± 0.9 b | 29.0 ± 0.4 a |
| Carbohydrate (μmol maltose/g) | 438 ± 31 a | 45.2 ± 2.3 b |
| Ingredient and Chemical Component | Experimental Diet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0YB | 2YB | 4YB | 6YB | 8YB | 10YB | |
| Ingredient (% of feed) | ||||||
| Fish meal | 28.0 | 28.0 | 28.0 | 28.0 | 28.0 | 28.0 |
| Soybean meal | 28.0 | 28.0 | 28.0 | 28.0 | 28.0 | 28.0 |
| Wheat flour | 25.4 | 25.4 | 25.4 | 25.4 | 25.4 | 25.4 |
| Broken rice | 10.0 | 8.00 | 6.00 | 4.00 | 2.00 | 0.00 |
| Soybean oil | 1.75 | 1.75 | 1.75 | 1.75 | 1.75 | 1.75 |
| Fish oil | 1.75 | 1.75 | 1.75 | 1.75 | 1.75 | 1.75 |
| Di-calcium phosphate | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 |
| Choline chloride | 0.10 | 0.10 | 0.10 | 0.10 | 0.10 | 0.10 |
| Vitamin-mineral premix 1 | 2.00 | 2.00 | 2.00 | 2.00 | 2.00 | 2.00 |
| Carboxymethylcellulose | 2.00 | 2.00 | 2.00 | 2.00 | 2.00 | 2.00 |
| Dried yellow bells flower | 0.00 | 2.00 | 4.00 | 6.00 | 8.00 | 10.0 |
| Proximate composition (as-fed basis) | ||||||
| Moisture (%) | 11.2 | 11.6 | 11.1 | 8.96 | 8.70 | 10.1 |
| Crude protein (%) | 38.4 | 40.9 | 40.6 | 41.1 | 41.3 | 40.7 |
| Crude lipid (%) | 4.67 | 4.87 | 4.89 | 4.97 | 5.23 | 5.22 |
| Crude fiber (%) | 1.32 | 1.56 | 1.75 | 1.74 | 1.79 | 2.10 |
| Ash (%) | 10.5 | 9.85 | 9.88 | 10.1 | 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Nitrogen-free extract (%) | 33.9 | 31.3 | 31.8 | 33.1 | 32.9 | 31.8 |
| Gross energy (kJ/g) | 16.7 | 17.0 | 17.0 | 17.4 | 17.5 | 17.1 |
| Parameter | Experimental Diet | p-Value | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0YB | 2YB | 4YB | 6YB | 8YB | 10YB | ||
| Survival (%) | 97.8 ± 2.2 | 100 ± 0 | 97.8 ± 2.2 | 100 ± 0 | 97.8 ± 2.2 | 100 ± 0 | 0.701 |
| IBW (g) | 0.72 ± 0.01 | 0.73 ± 0.01 | 0.74 ± 0.01 | 0.74 ± 0.02 | 0.75 ± 0.02 | 0.74 ± 0.01 | 0.099 |
| FBW (g) | 51.5 ± 0.8 ab | 56.0 ± 1.4 a | 53.2 ± 1.2 a | 52.5 ± 1.8 ab | 46.8 ± 3.0 bc | 44.1 ± 2.5 c | 0.008 |
| FTL (cm) | 13.6 ± 0.1 ab | 13.9 ± 0.2 a | 13.8 ± 0.1 ab | 13.5 ± 0.2 bc | 12.9 ± 0.1 d | 13.1 ± 0.1 cd | 0.001 |
| SGR (% BW/day) | 2.33 ± 0.05 | 2.37 ± 0.06 | 2.28 ± 0.06 | 2.27 ± 0.06 | 2.26 ± 0.06 | 2.18 ± 0.03 | 0.273 |
| WG (g) | 50.2 ± 0.3 ab | 54.6 ± 1.6 a | 51.3 ± 1.7 ab | 50.5 ± 1.4 ab | 45.5 ± 3.2 bc | 42.2 ± 1.9 c | 0.008 |
| CF | 1.96 ± 0.03 | 1.98 ± 0.03 | 1.94 ± 0.04 | 2.04 ± 0.02 | 1.97 ± 0.04 | 1.92 ± 0.09 | 0.622 |
| SSI (%) | 0.73 ± 0.02 bc | 0.69 ± 0.03 c | 0.90 ± 0.05 b | 0.90 ± 0.03 b | 0.82 ± 0.07 bc | 1.14 ± 0.10 a | <0.001 |
| ISI (%) | 3.44 ± 0.15 b | 3.65 ± 0.19 b | 3.55 ± 0.19 b | 3.84 ± 0.27 b | 4.76 ± 0.35 a | 3.69 ± 0.16 b | 0.004 |
| HSI (%) | 0.35 ± 0.04 abc | 0.23 ± 0.04 c | 0.46 ± 0.05 a | 0.45 ± 0.02 ab | 0.34 ± 0.03 bc | 0.33 ± 0.03 c | 0.004 |
| FR (% BW/day) | 3.90 ± 0.06 | 3.85 ± 0.04 | 3.80 ± 0.14 | 3.70 ± 0.06 | 3.84 ± 0.13 | 4.00 ± 0.14 | 0.494 |
| FCR | 1.12 ± 0.02 | 1.08 ± 0.03 | 1.09 ± 0.04 | 1.06 ± 0.02 | 1.11 ± 0.04 | 1.16 ± 0.04 | 0.429 |
| PER | 2.32 ± 0.04 | 2.26 ± 0.07 | 2.26 ± 0.08 | 2.29 ± 0.03 | 2.19 ± 0.07 | 2.12 ± 0.07 | 0.346 |
| Parameter | Experimental Diet | p-Value | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0YB | 2YB | 4YB | 6YB | 8YB | 10YB | ||
| Myosin and actin contents | |||||||
| ΔH Myosin (J/g) | 1.78 ± 0.03 b | 1.72 ± 0.06 b | 2.03 ± 0.08 a | 1.94 ± 0.02 a | 1.47 ± 0.02 c | 1.63 ± 0.05 bc | 0.001 |
| ΔH Actin (J/g) | 0.37 ± 0.01 | 0.33 ± 0.06 | 0.42 ± 0.02 | 0.33 ± 0.01 | 0.36 ± 0.01 | 0.35 ± 0.02 | 0.315 |
| ƩΔH (J/g) | 2.15 ± 0.04 b | 1.95 ± 0.04 c | 2.43 ± 0.05 a | 2.26 ± 0.02 b | 1.82 ± 0.01 d | 1.99 ± 0.02c | <0.001 |
| Actin/myosin ratio | 0.21 ± 0.01 | 0.16 ± 0.01 | 0.20 ± 0.01 | 0.16 ± 0.01 | 0.24 ± 0.01 | 0.20 ± 0.02 | 0.236 |
| Protein synthesis capacity | |||||||
| RNA (μg/g) | 1648 ± 25 | 1729 ± 107 | 1902 ± 96 | 1728 ± 95 | 1648 ± 94 | 1669 ± 71 | 0.307 |
| Protein (mg/g) | 165 ± 29 | 182 ± 14 | 192 ± 17 | 201 ± 31 | 203 ± 13 | 200 ± 7 | 0.761 |
| RNA/protein ratio (μg/mg) | 11.6 ± 1.9 | 9.61 ± 0.57 | 10.4 ± 1.3 | 10.4 ± 0.7 | 8.37 ± 0.94 | 8.40 ± 0.47 | 0.292 |
| Parameter | Experimental Diet | p-Value | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0YB | 2YB | 4YB | 6YB | 8YB | 10YB | ||
| WBC (×103 cells/μL) | 2.83 ± 0.42 a | 1.67 ± 0.42 b | 1.75 ± 0.29 b | 1.50 ± 0.25 b | 1.25 ± 0.14 b | 1.42 ± 0.08 b | 0.030 |
| RBC (×106 cells/μL) | 1.72 ± 0.11 | 2.05 ± 0.04 | 2.07 ± 0.07 | 2.12 ± 0.11 | 1.84 ± 0.07 | 1.90 ± 0.03 | 0.057 |
| PCV (%) | 31.3 ± 1.5 c | 35.5 ± 1.0 ab | 37.0 ± 1.0 a | 36.7 ± 0.3 ab | 37.3 ± 0.3 a | 33.5 ± 0.5 bc | 0.011 |
| Hb (g/dL) | 10.4 ± 0.5 b | 11.3 ± 0.5 ab | 12.3 ± 0.3 a | 12.2 ± 0.1 a | 12.4 ± 0.1 a | 11.7 ± 0.2 ab | 0.030 |
| MCV (fL) | 173 ± 17 | 174 ± 13 | 173 ± 11 | 185 ± 13 | 189 ± 14 | 190 ± 14 | 0.862 |
| MCH (pg) | 57.6 ± 5.5 | 58.1 ± 4.4 | 57.7 ± 3.6 | 57.6 ± 2.1 | 61.6 ± 4.2 | 63.0 ± 4.7 | 0.865 |
| MCHC (g/dL) | 33.3 ± 0.1 | 33.3 ± 0.1 | 33.3 ± 0.1 | 33.3 ± 0.1 | 33.3 ± 0.1 | 33.3 ± 0.1 | 0.649 |
| Thrombocytes (×103 cells/μL) | 227 ± 44 | 172 ± 29 | 237 ± 26 | 175 ± 9 | 180 ± 19 | 185 ± 17 | 0.393 |
| Plasma protein (g/dL) | 2.53 ± 0.07 | 2.80 ± 0.20 | 2.73 ± 0.07 | 2.60 ± 0.01 | 3.00 ± 0.20 | 2.80 ± 0.20 | 0.217 |
| Lysozyme activity (U/mg protein) | 22.4 ± 0.9 bc | 29.6 ± 1.0 abc | 35.0 ± 3.3 a | 28.1 ± 1.2 abc | 30.1 ± 3.1 ab | 20.9 ± 1.4 c | 0.011 |
| Parameter | Experimental Diet | p-Value | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0YB | 2YB | 4YB | 6YB | 8YB | 10YB | ||
| Moisture | 73.6 ± 0.3 | 73.5 ± 0.4 | 72.7 ± 0.3 | 73.0 ± 0.2 | 72.7 ± 0.5 | 72.7 ± 0.8 | 0.554 |
| Crude protein | 19.3 ± 0.4 c | 19.4 ± 0.2 c | 20.1 ± 0.2 ab | 19.6 ± 0.3 bc | 21.0 ± 0.4 ab | 21.2 ± 0.9 a | 0.046 |
| Crude lipid | 6.18 ± 0.21 | 5.94 ± 0.24 | 6.08 ± 0.20 | 5.92 ± 0.28 | 5.72 ± 0.26 | 6.46 ± 0.02 | 0.441 |
| Ash | 3.71 ± 0.20 c | 4.08 ± 0.38 bc | 4.63 ± 0.26 ab | 4.08 ± 0.26 bc | 4.91 ± 0.18 a | 4.85 ± 0.11 ab | 0.024 |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2026 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license.
Share and Cite
Hyukhongkaeo, K.; Nuntapong, N.; Hahor, W.; Thongprajukaew, K. Dietary Yellow Bells (Tecoma stans) Flower Enhances Gut Health, Fillet Quality, Hematological Indices, and Whole-Body Composition in Nile Tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus). Animals 2026, 16, 1702. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani16111702
Hyukhongkaeo K, Nuntapong N, Hahor W, Thongprajukaew K. Dietary Yellow Bells (Tecoma stans) Flower Enhances Gut Health, Fillet Quality, Hematological Indices, and Whole-Body Composition in Nile Tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus). Animals. 2026; 16(11):1702. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani16111702
Chicago/Turabian StyleHyukhongkaeo, Kanokwan, Nutt Nuntapong, Waraporn Hahor, and Karun Thongprajukaew. 2026. "Dietary Yellow Bells (Tecoma stans) Flower Enhances Gut Health, Fillet Quality, Hematological Indices, and Whole-Body Composition in Nile Tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus)" Animals 16, no. 11: 1702. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani16111702
APA StyleHyukhongkaeo, K., Nuntapong, N., Hahor, W., & Thongprajukaew, K. (2026). Dietary Yellow Bells (Tecoma stans) Flower Enhances Gut Health, Fillet Quality, Hematological Indices, and Whole-Body Composition in Nile Tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus). Animals, 16(11), 1702. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani16111702

