Effects of Compound Yeast Culture and Yeast Cell Wall Polysaccharide on Intestinal Barrier Function in Mongolian Ram Lambs
Simple Summary
Abstract
1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. CYC Preparation
2.2. Chemical Analysis
2.3. Animals and Diet
2.4. Sample Collection
2.5. 16S rRNA Sequencing
2.6. qPCR
2.7. Immunohistochemistry
2.8. Immunofluorescence
2.9. Western Immunoblotting
2.10. Statistical Analyses
3. Results
3.1. CYC and YPs Influence the Growth Performance of Lambs
3.2. CYC and YPs Influence Jejunal Tissue Morphology in Lambs
3.3. CYC and YPs Modulate Jejunal Tight Junction Protein Expression in Lambs
3.4. CYC and YPs Modulate Immune-Related Gene Expression in the Jejunum of Lambs
3.5. CYC and YPs Modulate CD4 and CD8 Expression in the Jejunum of Lambs
3.6. CYC and YPs Modulate the Structure of the Intestinal Microbiota in Lambs
3.7. Evaluation of the Correlations Between Intestinal Microbes, Immune Factors, and Tight Junction Proteins in the Jejunum
4. Discussion
5. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Data Availability Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Simeonov, M.; Harmon, D.L.; Freitas-de-Melo, A. Behavioral challenges and welfare implications in lambs raised under intensive dairy sheep production systems. Front. Anim. Sci. 2026, 7, 1810583. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, C.; Xu, Y.; Jia, J.; Weng, X.; Zhang, Y.; Peng, J.; An, X.; Wang, G. Impacts of Early Weaning on Lamb Gut Health and Immune Function: Short-Term and Long-Term Effects. Animals 2025, 15, 2135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Xu, Y.; Yin, F.; Wang, J.; Wu, P.; Qiu, X.; He, X.; Xiao, Y.; Gan, S. Effect of tea polyphenols on intestinal barrier and immune function in weaned lambs. Front. Vet. Sci. 2024, 11, 1361507. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Chowdhury, M.R.; Hassan, M.; Shimosato, T. Gut health management in livestock: Roles of probiotics, prebiotics, and synbiotics in growth, immunity, and microbiota modulation. Vet. Res. Commun. 2025, 49, 361. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ban, Y.; Guan, L.L. Implication and challenges of direct-fed microbial supplementation to improve ruminant production and health. J. Anim. Sci. Biotechnol. 2021, 12, 109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yang, L.; Wu, X.; Liu, D. Mechanism and application of yeast and its culture in regulating intestinal antioxidant defense in ruminants. Front. Vet. Sci. 2025, 12, 1657244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xu, J.; Li, X.; Fan, Q.; Zhao, S.; Jiao, T. Effects of Yeast Culture on Lamb Growth Performance, Rumen Microbiota, and Metabolites. Animals 2025, 15, 738. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Li, Y.; Han, L.; Liu, J.; Kang, L.; Zhao, L.; Cui, K. Yeast Peptides Improve the Intestinal Barrier Function and Alleviate Weaning Stress by Changing the Intestinal Microflora Structure of Weaned Lambs. Microorganisms 2023, 11, 2472. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Browne, N.; Daly, D.; Horgan, K. Differential impact of yeast cell wall products in recovery of porcine intestinal epithelial cell barrier function following Lipopolysaccharide challenge. Porc. Health Manag. 2023, 9, 18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cheng, Q.J.; Farrell, K.; Fenn, J.; Ma, Z.; Makanani, S.K.; Siemsen, J. Dectin-1 ligands produce distinct training phenotypes in human monocytes through differential activation of signaling networks. Sci. Rep. 2024, 14, 1454. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Aguilar-Uscanga, B.; Francois, J. A study of the yeast cell wall composition and structure in response to growth conditions and mode of cultivation. Lett. Appl. Microbiol. 2003, 37, 268–274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, S.; Yang, L.; Zhang, Y.; Chen, H.; Li, X.; Xu, Z.; Du, R.; Li, X.; Ma, J.; Liu, D. Review of yeast culture concerning the interactions between gut microbiota and young ruminant animals. Front. Vet. Sci. 2024, 11, 1335765. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Xu, Z.; Yang, L.; Chen, H.; Liu, S.; Li, X.; Li, S.; Ying, C.; Li, X.; Du, R.; Liu, D. Saccharomyces cerevisiae and Kluyveromyces marxianus yeast co-cultures modulate the ruminal microbiome and metabolite availability to enhance rumen barrier function and growth performance in weaned lambs. Anim. Nutr. 2024, 19, 139–152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Van Soest, P.J.; Robertson, J.B.; Lewis, B.A. Methods for Dietary Fiber, Neutral Detergent Fiber, and Nonstarch Polysaccharides in Relation to Animal Nutrition. J. Dairy. Sci. 1991, 74, 3583–3597. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Herlemann, D.P.R.; Labrenz, M.; Jürgens, K.; Bertilsson, S.; Waniek, J.J.; Andersson, A.F. Transitions in bacterial communities along the 2000 km salinity gradient of the Baltic Sea. ISME J. 2011, 5, 1571–1579. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kechin, A.; Boyarskikh, U.; Kel, A.; Filipenko, M. cutPrimers: A New Tool for Accurate Cutting of Primers from Reads of Targeted Next Generation Sequencing. J. Comput. Biol. 2017, 24, 1138–1143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Edgar, R.C. Search and clustering orders of magnitude faster than BLAST. Bioinformatics 2010, 26, 2460–2461. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Edgar, R.C. UPARSE: Highly accurate OTU sequences from microbial amplicon reads. Nat. Methods 2013, 10, 996–998. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Edgar, R.C. MUSCLE: Multiple sequence alignment with high accuracy and high throughput. Nucleic Acids Res. 2004, 32, 1792–1797. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Christian, Q.; Elmar, P.; Pelin, Y.; Jan, G.; Timmy, S.; Pablo, Y.; Jörg, P.; Frank Oliver, G.J.N.A.R. The SILVA ribosomal RNA gene database project: Improved data processing and web-based tools. Nucleic Acids Res. 2012, 41, D590–D596. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Watson, M.; McMurdie, P.J.; Holmes, S. phyloseq: An R Package for Reproducible Interactive Analysis and Graphics of Microbiome Census Data. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e61217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- McMurdie, P.J.; Holmes, S. Shiny-phyloseq: Web application for interactive microbiome analysis with provenance tracking. Bioinformatics 2015, 31, 282–283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Ren, S.; Wang, C.; Chen, A.; Lv, W.; Gao, R. The Probiotic Lactobacillus paracasei Ameliorates Diarrhea Cause by Escherichia coli O8via Gut Microbiota Modulation1. Front. Nutr. 2022, 9, 878808. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cao, R.; Zhou, J.; Liu, J.; Wang, Y.; Dai, Y.; Jiang, Y.; Yamauchi, A.; Atlas, D.; Jin, T.; Zhou, J.; et al. TXM-CB13 Improves the Intestinal Mucosal Barrier and Alleviates Colitis by Inhibiting the ROS/TXNIP/TRX/NLRP3 and TLR4/MyD88/NF-κB/NLRP3 Pathways. Inflammation 2025, 48, 3529–3541. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gao, D.; Zou, B.; Zhu, K.; Bi, S.; Zhang, W.; Yang, X.; Lai, J.; Liang, G.; Pan, P. Enhancing Th17 cells drainage through meningeal lymphatic vessels alleviate neuroinflammation after subarachnoid hemorrhage. J. Neuroinflamm. 2024, 21, 269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Scaldaferri, F.; Gerardi, V.; Lopetuso, L.R.; Del Zompo, F.; Mangiola, F.; Boškoski, I.; Bruno, G.; Petito, V.; Laterza, L.; Cammarota, G.; et al. Gut microbial flora, prebiotics, and probiotics in IBD: Their current usage and utility. BioMed Res. Int. 2013, 2013, 4352681. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, S.; Tao, Z.; Qiao, M.; Shi, L. The Functions of Major Gut Microbiota in Obesity and Type 2 Diabetes. Metabolites 2025, 15, 167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mahmoud, M.; Youssef, I.; Abd El-Tawab, M.; Bakr, H.; Eissa, N.; Hassan, M.; Giadinis, N.; Milewski, S.; Baumgartner, W.; Sobiech, P. Influence of probiotic and yeast culture supplementation on selected biochemical and immunological parameters of growing lambs. Pol. J. Vet. Sci. 2020, 23, 5–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Qi, P.; Wang, L. Effect of Adding Yeast Cultures to High-Grain Conditions on Production Performance, Rumen Fermentation Profile, Microbial Abundance, and Immunity in Goats. Animals 2024, 14, 1799. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Huan, Y.W.; Bengtsson, R.J.; MacIntyre, N.; Guthrie, J.; Finlayson, H.; Smith, S.H.; Archibald, A.L.; Ait-Ali, T. Lawsonia intracellularis exploits β-catenin/Wnt and Notch signalling pathways during infection of intestinal crypt to alter cell homeostasis and promote cell proliferation. PLoS ONE 2017, 12, e0173782. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wu, W.; Zhang, L.; Xia, B.; Tang, S.; Xie, J.; Zhang, H. Modulation of Pectin on Mucosal Innate Immune Function in Pigs Mediated by Gut Microbiota. Microorganisms 2020, 8, 535. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, J.; Li, M.; Zheng, F.; Niu, C.; Liu, C.; Li, Q.; Sun, J. Cell wall polysaccharides: Before and after autolysis of brewer’s yeast. World J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2018, 34, 137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Yu, C.; Chen, H.; Du, D.; Lv, W.; Li, S.; Li, D.; Xu, Z.; Gao, M.; Hu, H.; Liu, D. β-Glucan from Saccharomyces cerevisiae alleviates oxidative stress in LPS-stimulated RAW264.7 cells via Dectin-1/Nrf2/HO-1 signaling pathway. Cell Stress. Chaperones 2021, 26, 629–637. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Yang, C.; Zhang, T.; Tian, Q.; Cheng, Y.; Gebeyew, K.; Liu, G.; Tan, Z.; He, Z. Supplementing Mannan Oligosaccharide Reduces the Passive Transfer of Immunoglobulin G and Improves Antioxidative Capacity, Immunity, and Intestinal Microbiota in Neonatal Goats. Front. Microbiol. 2022, 12, 795081. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Aksel, E.G.; Akyüz, B. Effect of LPS and LTA stimulation on the expression of TLR-pathway genes in PBMCs of Akkaraman lambs in vivo. Trop. Anim. Health Prod. 2021, 53, 65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]










| Items | CYC | YPs |
|---|---|---|
| Crude protein | 20.39 | 31 |
| Dry matter, % | 92.58 | 95.3 |
| Neutral detergent fiber, % | 33.45 | 73 |
| Acid detergent fiber, % | 19.2 | 52 |
| β-Glucan, % | 10.5 | 42 |
| Mannan, % | 9 | 20 |
| Live yeast cells, CFU/g | 6.8 × 104 | - |
| Items | Groups | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Con | CYC | YP | |
| Ingredients | |||
| Peanut vine | 23 | 23 | 23 |
| Cornstalk | 5 | 5 | 5 |
| Sunflower seed skin | 4 | 4 | 4 |
| Alfalfa meal | 10 | 10 | 10 |
| Corn | 27 | 27 | 27 |
| Soybean meal | 10 | 10 | 10 |
| Germ meal | 5.5 | 5.5 | 5.5 |
| Cotton meal | 5 | 5 | 5 |
| Wheat bran | 2 | 2 | 2 |
| Peanut cake | 4 | 4 | 4 |
| NaCl | 0.5 | 0.5 | 0.5 |
| NaHCO3 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 0.5 |
| CaHPO4 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 0.5 |
| 4% premix 1 | 3 | 3 | 3 |
| Total | 100 | 100 | 100 |
| Nutrient levels (%, DM basis) | |||
| Metabolizable energy, MJ/kg 2 | 10.48 | 11.00 | 10.36 |
| Dry matter 3 | 88.5 | 89.77 | 88.21 |
| Crude protein 4 | 15.81 | 15.91 | 15.29 |
| Organic matter 5 | 95.6 | 96.89 | 95.23 |
| Neutral detergent fiber | 32.68 | 32.86 | 32.56 |
| Acid detergent fiber | 21.76 | 22.25 | 21.11 |
| Ca | 2 | 2 | 2 |
| P | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| Gene | Sequence (5′-3′) | GenBank No. |
|---|---|---|
| V3-V4 | 341F: 5′-CCTACGGGNGGCWGCAG-3′ | Reference |
| 805R: (5′-GACTACHVGGGTATCTAATCC-3′) | ||
| MyD88 | F: ATGGTGGTGGTTGTCTCTGAC | GQ221044.1 |
| R: GGAACTCTTTCTTCATTGGCTTGT | ||
| TLR-2 | F: CAAGAGGAAGCCCAGGAAG | DQ890157.1 |
| R: TGGACCATGAGGTTCTCCA | ||
| TLR-4 | F: TGCTGGCTGCAAAAAGTATG | HQ343416.1 |
| R: CCCTGTAGTGAAGGCAGAGC | ||
| TRAF-6 | F: TCAGAGAACAGATGCCCAAT | XM_012134166.2 |
| R: GCGTGCCAAGTGATTCCT | ||
| IL-10 | F: AGGAAAAAGATGGATGCTTCCA | NM_001009392 |
| R: GACCAGCAGTGGTTTTGATCAA | ||
| IL-12 | F: CGTCTTCCTGGGACGTTTTAG | NM_001009465 |
| R: CTGCGTATGGCTTCTTTAGGG | ||
| NF-κB | F: ATACGTCGGCCGTGTCTAT | XM_005226864.2 |
| R: GGAACTGTGATCCGTGTAG | ||
| TNF-α | F: ACACCATGAGCACCAAAAGC | NM_001024860.1 |
| R: AGGCACAAGCAACTTCTGGA | ||
| IL-1β | F: GGCAGATGATAATTGGCGTTAC | NW_025421343.1 |
| R: CTCGCGGGGCAGCTCTTGA | ||
| IL-6 | F: AGGAAAAAGATGGATGCTTCCA | NM_001009392 |
| R: GACCAGCAGTGGTTTTGATCAA | ||
| sIgA | F: GGCAGATGATAATTGGCGTTAC | AF024645.1 |
| R: CTCGCGGGGCAGCTCTTGA | ||
| β-actin | F: GCTCTTCCAGCCGTCCTT | NM_001009784.1 |
| R: TGAAGGTGGTCTCGTGAATGC |
| Item | Con | CYC | YPs | p-Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Initial weight | 19.28 ± 2.82 | 18.39 ± 5.55 | 18.28 ± 1.64 | 0.48 |
| Initial intake | 0.91 ± 0.22 | 0.89 ± 0.15 | 0.88 ± 0.35 | 0.183 |
| 30 d weight | 24.83 ± 4.52 | 26.17 ± 5.69 | 25.89 ± 3.01 | 0.178 |
| 30 d intake | 1.14 ± 0.26 b | 1.19 ± 0.34 a | 1.18 ± 0.36 a | 0.045 |
| ADG (0~30 d) | 0.19 ± 0.03 c | 0.26 ± 0.06 a | 0.25 ± 0.05 b | 0.033 |
| ADFI (0~30 d) | 1.03 ± 0.27 | 1.04 ± 0.31 | 1.03 ± 0.22 | 0.072 |
| F/G | 5.42 ± 0.22 a | 4.00 ± 0.38 b | 4.12 ± 0.24 b | 0.041 |
| Con | CYC | YPs | p-Value | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Villous height (μ) | ||||
| Duodenum | 523.54 ± 15.03 b | 552.50 ± 12.36 a | 532.32 ± 16.12 b | 0.043 |
| Jejunum | 516.26 ± 23.11 | 532.21 ± 13.41 | 525.25 ± 25.34 | 0.178 |
| Ileum | 407.38 ± 19.23 | 425.44 ± 11.40 | 395.54 ± 21.32 | 0.064 |
| Crypt depth (μm) | ||||
| Duodenum | 474.36 ± 11.33 b | 486.71 ± 13.33 a | 481.86 ± 18.05 a | 0.029 |
| Jejunum | 386.25 ± 21.22 | 365.53 ± 15.28 | 388.30 ± 18.00 | 0.097 |
| Ileum | 327.42 ± 30.32 b | 346.21 ± 23.21 b | 371.23 ± 26.12 a | 0.025 |
| VCR | ||||
| Duodenum | 1.10 ± 0.07 | 1.14 ± 0.15 | 1.11 ± 0.11 | 0.214 |
| Jejunum | 1.33 ± 0.12 b | 1.46 ± 0.31 a | 1.35 ± 0.18 b | 0.048 |
| Ileum | 1.24 ± 0.23 b | 1.23 ± 0.09 a | 1.06 ± 0.05 c | 0.019 |
| Estimators/Sample | Con | CYC | YPs | p-Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Shannon | 3.39 ± 0.2 a | 2.57 ± 0.18 b | 3.38 ± 0.15 a | 0.002 |
| Simpson | 0.06 ± 0.02 b | 0.23 ± 0.01 a | 0.06 ± 0.02 b | 0.003 |
| Ace | 229.99 ± 11.23 b | 218.9 ± 8.65 b | 241.44 ± 7.95 a | 0.03 |
| Chao1 | 201.78 ± 22.64 b | 201.74 ± 18.97 b | 233.57 ± 15.51 a | 0.006 |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2026 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license.
Share and Cite
Li, S.; Bai, P.; Liu, S.; Xu, Z.; Zolzaya, M.; Purevtsogt, D.; Chen, H.; Liu, D. Effects of Compound Yeast Culture and Yeast Cell Wall Polysaccharide on Intestinal Barrier Function in Mongolian Ram Lambs. Animals 2026, 16, 1661. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani16111661
Li S, Bai P, Liu S, Xu Z, Zolzaya M, Purevtsogt D, Chen H, Liu D. Effects of Compound Yeast Culture and Yeast Cell Wall Polysaccharide on Intestinal Barrier Function in Mongolian Ram Lambs. Animals. 2026; 16(11):1661. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani16111661
Chicago/Turabian StyleLi, Songjian, Pengxiang Bai, Shixiong Liu, Zixuan Xu, Majigsuren Zolzaya, Dorjgoo Purevtsogt, Hui Chen, and Dacheng Liu. 2026. "Effects of Compound Yeast Culture and Yeast Cell Wall Polysaccharide on Intestinal Barrier Function in Mongolian Ram Lambs" Animals 16, no. 11: 1661. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani16111661
APA StyleLi, S., Bai, P., Liu, S., Xu, Z., Zolzaya, M., Purevtsogt, D., Chen, H., & Liu, D. (2026). Effects of Compound Yeast Culture and Yeast Cell Wall Polysaccharide on Intestinal Barrier Function in Mongolian Ram Lambs. Animals, 16(11), 1661. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani16111661

