Alleviating the Adverse Effects of Lipopolysaccharide on Production Performance, Immune Function, and Intestinal Damage in Broilers via Dietary Alkaline Phosphatase
Simple Summary
Abstract
1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Experimental Design and Dietary Treatment
2.2. Feeding Management and Production Performance Statistics
2.3. Sample Collection
2.4. Determination of Serum Immunoglobulin Levels
2.5. Determination of Antioxidant Indices in Jejunal Mucosa
2.6. Observation of Intestinal Morphology
2.7. Extraction of mRNA from Jejunal Mucosa and RT-qPCR
2.8. Data Processing and Statistical Analysis
3. Results
3.1. Ameliorative Effects of Dietary Alkaline Phosphatase on Growth Performance of Broilers Under Lipopolysaccharide Stress
3.2. Effects of Dietary Alkaline Phosphatase on Serum Immunoglobulin Levels in Broilers Under Lipopolysaccharide Stress
3.3. Effects of Dietary Alkaline Phosphatase on Antioxidant Enzyme Activities in the Jejunal Mucosa of Broilers Under Lipopolysaccharide Stress
3.4. Effects of Dietary Alkaline Phosphatase on the Duodenal Villus Structure of Broilers Under Lipopolysaccharide Stress
3.5. Effects of Dietary Alkaline Phosphatase on the Jejunal Villus Structure of Broilers Under Lipopolysaccharide Stress
3.6. Effects of Dietary Alkaline Phosphatase on the Ileal Villus Structure of Broilers Under Lipopolysaccharide Stress
3.7. Effects of Dietary Alkaline Phosphatase on the Gene Expression Levels of Inflammatory Cytokines in the Jejunal Mucosa of Broilers Under Lipopolysaccharide Stress
3.8. Effects of Dietary Alkaline Phosphatase on the Gene Expression Levels of Tight Junction Proteins in the Jejunal Mucosa of Broilers Under Lipopolysaccharide Stress
4. Discussion
5. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Zheng, B.; Xiao, X.; Wang, Y.; Bai, D.; Zhen, W.; Guo, F.; Zhang, B.; Zhang, Y.; Ma, Y. The Potential of Chlorogenic Acid in Regulating Oxidative Damage, Lipid Metabolism, and Inflammation in Chickens: A Comprehensive Review. Vet. Sci. 2026, 13, 267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Choi, J. Challenges in Poultry Production Systems and Nutritional Interventions. Animals 2025, 15, 530. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhi, K.; Gong, F.; Chen, L.; Li, Z.; Li, X.; Mei, H.; Fu, C.; Zhao, Y.; Liu, Z.; He, J. Effects of Sea-Buckthorn Flavonoids on Growth Performance, Serum Inflammation, Intestinal Barrier and Microbiota in LPS-Challenged Broilers. Animals 2024, 14, 2073. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Luo, R.; Yao, Y.; Chen, Z.; Sun, X. An examination of the LPS-TLR4 immune response through the analysis of molecular structures and protein-protein interactions. Cell Commun. Signal. 2025, 23, 142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Marongiu, L.; Gornati, L.; Artuso, I.; Zanoni, I.; Granucci, F. Below the surface: The inner lives of TLR4 and TLR9. J. Leukoc. Biol. 2019, 106, 147–160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jin, S.; Wang, H.; Gong, H.; Guo, L.; Zhang, H.; Zhang, J.; Chang, Q.; Li, J.; Zhang, R.; Bao, J. Music intervention mitigates LPS-induced gut barrier disruption and immune stress in broilers via TLR4/NF-κB regulation. Poult. Sci. 2025, 104, 105189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhao, H.; Huang, Y.; Yang, W.; Huang, C.; Ou, Z.; He, J.; Yang, M.; Wu, J.; Yao, H.; Yang, Y.; et al. Viola yedoensis Makino alleviates lipopolysaccharide-induced intestinal oxidative stress and inflammatory response by regulating the gut microbiota and NF-κB-NLRP3/ Nrf2-MAPK signaling pathway in broiler. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2024, 282, 116692. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Martens, E.C.; Neumann, M.; Desai, M.S. Interactions of commensal and pathogenic microorganisms with the intestinal mucosal barrier. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2018, 16, 457–470. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Chen, Y.; Liu, C.; Lin, Y. Involvement of ferroptosis in lipopolysaccharide-induced intestinal inflammation in broilers. Poult. Sci. 2025, 104, 105512. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rostagno, M.H. Effects of heat stress on the gut health of poultry. J. Anim. Sci. 2020, 98, a90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Ghareeb, K.; Awad, W.A.; Böhm, J.; Zebeli, Q. Impact of luminal and systemic endotoxin exposure on gut function, immune response and performance of chickens. World’s Poult. Sci. J. 2016, 72, 367–380. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jiang, J.; Qi, L.; Lv, Z.; Jin, S.; Wei, X.; Shi, F. Dietary Stevioside Supplementation Alleviates Lipopolysaccharide-Induced Intestinal Mucosal Damage through Anti-Inflammatory and Antioxidant Effects in Broiler Chickens. Antioxidants 2019, 8, 575. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Zhang, B.; Zhong, Q.; Liu, N.; Song, P.; Zhu, P.; Zhang, C.; Sun, Z. Dietary Glutamine Supplementation Alleviated Inflammation Responses and Improved Intestinal Mucosa Barrier of LPS-Challenged Broilers. Animals 2022, 12, 1729. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- St Paul, M.; Barjesteh, N.; Paolucci, S.; Pei, Y.; Sharif, S. Toll-like receptor ligands induce the expression of interferon-gamma and interleukin-17 in chicken CD4+ T cells. BMC Res. Notes 2012, 5, 616. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jarry, A.; Bossard, C.; Bou-Hanna, C.; Masson, D.; Espaze, E.; Denis, M.G.; Laboisse, C.L. Mucosal IL-10 and TGF-beta play crucial roles in preventing LPS-driven, IFN-gamma-mediated epithelial damage in human colon explants. J. Clin. Investig. 2008, 118, 1132–1142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sharma, U.; Pal, D.; Prasad, R. Alkaline phosphatase: An overview. Indian J. Clin. Biochem. 2014, 29, 269–278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Melo, A.D.B.; Silveira, H.; Luciano, F.B.; Andrade, C.; Costa, L.B.; Rostagno, M.H. Intestinal Alkaline Phosphatase: Potential Roles in Promoting Gut Health in Weanling Piglets and Its Modulation by Feed Additives—A Review. Asian-Australas. J. Anim. Sci. 2016, 29, 16–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
- Singh, S.B.; Carroll-Portillo, A.; Coffman, C.; Ritz, N.L.; Lin, H.C. Intestinal Alkaline Phosphatase Exerts Anti-Inflammatory Effects Against Lipopolysaccharide by Inducing Autophagy. Sci. Rep. 2020, 10, 3107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Parlato, M.; Charbit-Henrion, F.; Pan, J.; Romano, C.; Duclaux-Loras, R.; Le Du, M.; Warner, N.; Francalanci, P.; Bruneau, J.; Bras, M.; et al. Human ALPI deficiency causes inflammatory bowel disease and highlights a key mechanism of gut homeostasis. EMBO Mol. Med. 2018, 10, e8483. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lallès, J. Intestinal alkaline phosphatase: Multiple biological roles in maintenance of intestinal homeostasis and modulation by diet. Nutr. Rev. 2010, 68, 323–332. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, W.; Hu, D.; Huo, H.; Zhang, W.; Adiliaghdam, F.; Morrison, S.; Ramirez, J.M.; Gul, S.S.; Hamarneh, S.R.; Hodin, R.A. Intestinal Alkaline Phosphatase Regulates Tight Junction Protein Levels. J. Am. Coll. Surg. 2016, 222, 1009–1017. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ji, W.; Yang, D.; Zhang, W.; Wang, Y.; Hao, Z.; Guo, K.; Sun, X.; Wang, S.; Yang, S.; Ma, J.; et al. Alleviating Clostridium perfringens-Induced Gut Lesionsin Broiler Chickens by Orally Administered Bovine Intestinal Alkaline Phosphatase. Probiotics Antimicrob. Proteins 2026, 18, 2104–2121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Wojcik-Grzybek, D.; Sliwowski, Z.; Kwiecien, S.; Ginter, G.; Surmiak, M.; Hubalewska-Mazgaj, M.; Chmura, A.; Wojcik, A.; Kosciolek, T.; Danielak, A.; et al. Alkaline Phosphatase Relieves Colitis in Obese Mice Subjected to Forced Exercise via Its Anti-Inflammatory and Intestinal Microbiota-Shaping Properties. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2024, 25, 703. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Alam, S.N.; Yammine, H.; Moaven, O.; Ahmed, R.; Moss, A.K.; Biswas, B.; Muhammad, N.; Biswas, R.; Raychowdhury, A.; Kaliannan, K.; et al. Intestinal alkaline phosphatase prevents antibiotic-induced susceptibility to enteric pathogens. Ann. Surg. 2014, 259, 715–722. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Huang, B.; Wan, Y.; Li, G.; Cui, J.; Jiang, Q.; Zhong, X.; Zhang, B. Immune stress impairs broiler performance by affecting hypothalamic methylation modification and intestinal 5-HT synthesis. Poult. Sci. 2025, 104, 105444. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ramasamy, S.; Nguyen, D.D.; Eston, M.A.; Alam, S.N.; Moss, A.K.; Ebrahimi, F.; Biswas, B.; Mostafa, G.; Chen, K.T.; Kaliannan, K.; et al. Intestinal alkaline phosphatase has beneficial effects in mouse models of chronic colitis. Inflamm. Bowel Dis. 2011, 17, 532–542. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Davis, E. Immunometabolism and inflammation: A perspective on animal productivity. Anim. Front. 2022, 12, 5–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Schroeder, H.W.J.; Cavacini, L. Structure and function of immunoglobulins. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 2010, 125, S41–S52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- De Boever, S.; Beyaert, R.; Vandemaele, F.; Baert, K.; Duchateau, L.; Goddeeris, B.; De Backer, P.; Croubels, S. The influence of age and repeated lipopolysaccharide administration on body temperature and the concentration of interleukin-6 and IgM antibodies against lipopolysaccharide in broiler chickens. Avian Pathol. 2008, 37, 39–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, J.; Han, H.; Zhang, L.; Wang, T. Dietary bisdemethoxycurcumin supplementation attenuates lipopolysaccharide-induced damages on intestinal redox potential and redox status of broilers. Poult. Sci. 2021, 100, 101061. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Marnett, L.J. Oxy radicals, lipid peroxidation and DNA damage. Toxicology 2002, 181–182, 219–222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Irato, P.; Santovito, G. Enzymatic and Non-Enzymatic Molecules with Antioxidant Function. Antioxidants 2021, 10, 579. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Balabanova, L.; Bondarev, G.; Seitkalieva, A.; Son, O.; Tekutyeva, L. Insights into Alkaline Phosphatase Anti-Inflammatory Mechanisms. Biomedicines 2024, 12, 2502. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Aminullah, N.; Langar, H.; Mahaq, O.; Azizi, M.N.; Zahir, A. Microbial ecology, functional implications, and associated factors influencing poultry intestinal health. Vet. Immunol. Immunopathol. 2026, 293, 111065. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Singh, P.; Mohanty, B. Mechanisms of repetitive LPS exposure-induced toxicity in murine model via toll-like receptor 4 mediated NF-κB/NLRP3/COX-2 signalling: An in vivo and in silico analysis. Food Chem. Toxicol. 2025, 206, 115785. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Hwang, S.W.; Kim, J.H.; Lee, C.; Im, J.P.; Kim, J.S. Intestinal alkaline phosphatase ameliorates experimental colitis via toll-like receptor 4-dependent pathway. Eur. J. Pharmacol. 2018, 820, 156–166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Zhao, C.; Hu, X.; Bao, L.; Wu, K.; Zhao, Y.; Xiang, K.; Li, S.; Wang, Y.; Qiu, M.; Feng, L.; et al. Gut dysbiosis induces the development of mastitis through a reduction in host anti-inflammatory enzyme activity by endotoxemia. Microbiome 2022, 10, 205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Arumugam, P.; Saha, K.; Nighot, P. Intestinal Epithelial Tight Junction Barrier Regulation by Novel Pathways. Inflamm. Bowel Dis. 2025, 31, 259–271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Santos, G.M.; Ismael, S.; Morais, J.; Araújo, J.O.R.; Faria, A.; Calhau, C.O.; Marques, C. Intestinal Alkaline Phosphatase: A Review of This Enzyme Role in the Intestinal Barrier Function. Microorganisms 2022, 10, 746. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ghosh, S.S.; Wang, J.; Yannie, P.J.; Ghosh, S. Intestinal Barrier Dysfunction, LPS Translocation, and Disease Development. J. Endocr. Soc. 2020, 4, z39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bates, J.M.; Akerlund, J.; Mittge, E.; Guillemin, K. Intestinal alkaline phosphatase detoxifies lipopolysaccharide and prevents inflammation in zebrafish in response to the gut microbiota. Cell Host Microbe 2007, 2, 371–382. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Dissanayake, W.M.N.; Chandanee, M.R.; Lee, S.; Heo, J.M.; Yi, Y. Change in intestinal alkaline phosphatase activity is a hallmark of antibiotic-induced intestinal dysbiosis. Anim. Biosci. 2023, 36, 1403–1413. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Estaki, M.; Decoffe, D.; Gibson, D.L. Interplay between intestinal alkaline phosphatase, diet, gut microbes and immunity. World J. Gastroenterol. 2014, 20, 15650–15656. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]



| Feed Ingredients | 1–21 Days (%) | 22–42 Days (%) |
|---|---|---|
| Corn (CP 8.0%) | 50.34 | 57.28 |
| Broken rice (CP 10.4%) | 5.76 | 4.00 |
| Soybean meal (CP 44%) | 36.85 | 29.85 |
| Rapeseed meal (CP 35.7%) | 0.00 | 2.00 |
| Soybean oil | 3.00 | 3.00 |
| Calcium hydrogen phosphate (anhydrous) | 1.10 | 0.95 |
| Stone powder | 1.10 | 1.15 |
| Lysine (70%) | 0.28 | 0.25 |
| Methionine (50%) | 0.28 | 0.25 |
| Threonine (98%) | 0.08 | 0.06 |
| Salt | 0.30 | 0.30 |
| Choline chloride | 0.15 | 0.15 |
| Antioxidant | 0.02 | 0.02 |
| Vitamin premix 1 | 0.62 | 0.62 |
| Micronutrient premix 2 | 0.12 | 0.12 |
| Total | 100.00 | 100.00 |
| Estimated value of nutrient content 3 | ||
| Metabolizable energy (MJ/kg) | 12.52 | 12.48 |
| Crude protein (%) | 20.84 | 18.76 |
| Calcium (%) | 0.88 | 0.80 |
| Available phosphorus (%) | 0.42 | 0.41 |
| Lysine (%) | 1.37 | 1.22 |
| Methionine (%) | 0.48 | 0.44 |
| Methionine + cysteine (%) | 0.82 | 0.77 |
| Threonine (%) | 0.89 | 0.81 |
| Gene Names 1 | Accession Number | Primer (5′-3′) 2 | Product Size (bp) |
|---|---|---|---|
| IFN-γ | NM_205149.2 | F: AGCCGCACATCAAACACATA | 150 |
| R: AAGTCGTTCATCGGGAGCTT | |||
| IL-17 | NM_204460.2 | F: GAGAGCCTCTTCAAGAAAGC | 199 |
| R: GAGTTCACGCACCTGGAATG | |||
| Claudin 2 | NM_001277622.1 | F: ATGGTCTCTATGGGACTCCAGC | 190 |
| R: CACCAGCTGCTGGGTGATG | |||
| Claudin 3 | NM_204202.2 | F: ATGTCTATGGGGCTGGAGATC | 109 |
| R: CAGCCAGCCCAGCACCGAC | |||
| Occludin | NM_205128.1 | F: ATGCCCCCCCCACGGGGTA | 147 |
| R: CGCACGATGCAGATGGCG | |||
| ZO-1 | XM_040706827.2 | F: GGACAGCCCAGATGGCCATAG | 136 |
| R: TCAGACTTACACTACAGGTAGC | |||
| ZO-2 | NM_001396726.1 | F: TTCATCATCAGAAGCCACTTTGAG | 136 |
| R: CAGCCAACTTTCCAAGTTTGCC | |||
| β-actin | NM_205518.2 | F: GAGAAATTGTGCGTGACATCAAG | 126 |
| R: CCTGAACCTCTCATTGCCAAT |
| Items 2 | Control | LPS | LPS + 1000 U/kg ALP | LPS + 5000 U/kg ALP | p Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1–21 days | |||||
| IW, g | 40.66 ± 0.33 | 40.84 ± 0.44 | 40.74 ± 0.34 | 40.81 ± 0.42 | 0.871 |
| FW, g | 656.77 ± 20.68 a | 594.12 ± 9.09 c | 632.38 ± 37.83 b | 612.25 ± 23.06 bc | 0.007 |
| ADFI, g/d | 41.81 ± 2.24 a | 38.58 ± 0.74 b | 39.98 ± 1.71 ab | 39.45 ± 1.56 b | 0.043 |
| ADG, g/d | 29.34 ± 0.97 a | 26.35 ± 0.45 c | 28.17 ± 1.79 ab | 27.21 ± 1.09 bc | 0.006 |
| FCR | 1.38 ± 0.02 | 1.40 ± 0.03 | 1.37 ± 0.03 | 1.40 ± 0.03 | 0.209 |
| 22–42 days | |||||
| FW, g | 2041.45 ± 50.54 a | 1809.74 ± 124.56 b | 1983.40 ± 56.17 a | 1970.38 ± 31.67 a | 0.001 |
| ADFI, g/d | 122.98 ± 2.22 a | 110.19 ± 8.68 b | 120.88 ± 0.95 a | 119.00 ± 1.48 a | 0.002 |
| ADG, g/d | 65.94 ± 2.10 a | 57.89 ± 5.86 b | 64.33 ± 1.96 a | 64.67 ± 1.76 a | 0.007 |
| FCR | 1.88 ± 0.06 | 1.92 ± 0.03 | 1.89 ± 0.05 | 1.87 ± 0.07 | 0.617 |
| 1–42 days | |||||
| ADFI, g/d | 82.39 ± 1.90 a | 74.39 ± 4.65 b | 80.43 ± 0.85 a | 79.23 ± 1.32 a | 0.001 |
| ADG, g/d | 47.64 ± 1.20 a | 42.12 ± 2.97 b | 46.25 ± 1.33 a | 45.94 ± 0.76 a | 0.001 |
| FCR | 1.71 ± 0.03 | 1.75 ± 0.01 | 1.72 ± 0.04 | 1.72 ± 0.04 | 0.514 |
| Items 2 | Control | LPS | LPS + 1000 U/kg ALP | LPS + 5000 U/kg ALP | p Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 21 day | |||||
| IgA, pg/mL | 2116.51 ± 420.10 | 1752.64 ± 200.17 | 1742.34 ± 384.13 | 1844.27 ± 348.94 | 0.324 |
| IgM, μg/mL | 26.31 ± 11.73 | 42.16 ± 17.08 | 38.60 ± 10.13 | 40.15 ± 30.05 | 0.559 |
| IgG, ng/mL | 75.59 ± 28.92 | 47.32 ± 12.86 | 59.57 ± 9.38 | 71.37 ± 34.96 | 0.279 |
| 42 day | |||||
| IgA, pg/mL | 1103.10 ± 145.78 | 1115.46 ± 235.93 | 1208.10 ± 169.36 | 1195.35 ± 289.36 | 0.861 |
| IgM, μg/mL | 49.88 ± 21.88 | 44.41 ± 16.46 | 38.06 ± 4.64 | 48.41 ± 16.41 | 0.792 |
| IgG, ng/mL | 53.33 ± 15.05 | 44.37 ± 11.38 | 48.10 ± 1.62 | 47.12 ± 9.85 | 0.662 |
| Items 2 | Control | LPS | LPS + 1000 U/kg ALP | LPS + 5000 U/kg ALP | p Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 21 day | |||||
| T-AOC, μmol/mg prot | 0.13 ± 0.01 | 0.11 ± 0.02 | 0.14 ± 0.03 | 0.14 ± 0.03 | 0.222 |
| SOD, U/mg prot | 2.76 ± 0.38 | 2.55 ± 0.38 | 3.22 ± 0.28 | 2.90 ± 0.99 | 0.349 |
| GSH-Px, U/mg prot | 17.32 ± 3.85 a | 13.00 ± 1.88 ab | 11.59 ± 2.10 b | 15.77 ± 4.17 ab | 0.045 |
| CAT, U/mg prot | 22.68 ± 6.11 | 21.13 ± 5.44 | 24.01 ± 1.31 | 19.83 ± 8.41 | 0.692 |
| MDA, nmol/mg prot | 0.46 ± 0.18 b | 1.09 ± 0.39 a | 0.78 ± 0.11 ab | 0.91 ± 0.24 a | 0.014 |
| 42 day | |||||
| T-AOC, μmol/mg prot | 0.17 ± 0.02 | 0.17 ± 0.05 | 0.17 ± 0.03 | 0.22 ± 0.02 | 0.066 |
| SOD, U/mg prot | 2.72 ± 0.31 | 3.01 ± 0.50 | 3.21 ± 0.28 | 2.90 ± 0.32 | 0.234 |
| GSH-Px, U/mg prot | 14.38 ± 3.25 b | 11.95 ± 3.29 b | 14.04 ± 3.52 b | 23.23 ± 5.89 a | 0.003 |
| CAT, U/mg prot | 24.01 ± 6.91 b | 26.02 ± 6.42 b | 42.31 ± 4.67 a | 25.41 ± 16.29 b | 0.028 |
| MDA, nmol/mg prot | 0.99 ± 0.20 | 1.18 ± 0.42 | 1.14 ± 0.39 | 1.06 ± 0.64 | 0.900 |
| Items 2 | Control | LPS | LPS + 1000 U/kg ALP | LPS + 5000 U/kg ALP | p Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 21 day | |||||
| Villus height, μm | 1389.29 ± 198.24 | 1134.87 ± 125.02 | 1278.23 ± 125.94 | 1232.65 ± 131.95 | 0.094 |
| Crypt depth, μm | 202.13 ± 26.43 b | 259.20 ± 24.12 a | 184.56 ± 33.51 b | 210.88 ± 8.96 b | 0.002 |
| V/C ratio | 6.96 ± 1.31 a | 4.41 ± 0.60 b | 7.11 ± 1.48 a | 5.85 ± 0.74 ab | 0.004 |
| 42 day | |||||
| Villus height, μm | 1637.58 ± 271.70 | 1555.60 ± 194.44 | 1632.10 ± 160.85 | 1663.06 ± 259.91 | 0.893 |
| Crypt depth, μm | 245.17 ± 50.91 | 272.61 ± 35.50 | 277.54 ± 57.39 | 262.68 ± 28.92 | 0.693 |
| V/C ratio | 6.80 ± 1.06 | 5.75 ± 0.76 | 6.02 ± 0.88 | 6.40 ± 1.22 | 0.387 |
| Items 2 | Control | LPS | LPS + 1000 U/kg ALP | LPS + 5000 U/kg ALP | p Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 21 day | |||||
| Villus height, μm | 1189.19 ± 267.64 | 1072.17 ± 192.63 | 1178.30 ± 86.41 | 1179.61 ± 215.19 | 0.771 |
| Crypt depth, μm | 156.99 ± 29.96 b | 218.00 ± 10.82 a | 161.60 ± 15.70 b | 168.79 ± 38.71 b | 0.007 |
| V/C ratio | 7.57 ± 1.16 a | 4.90 ± 0.74 b | 7.36 ± 1.00 a | 7.07 ± 0.62 a | 0.001 |
| 42 day | |||||
| Villus height, μm | 1287.30 ± 181.24 | 1193.13 ± 233.91 | 1202.16 ± 181.47 | 1399.37 ± 306.73 | 0.484 |
| Crypt depth, μm | 186.98 ± 22.31 b | 232.76 ± 21.00 a | 203.23 ± 18.52 ab | 223.39 ± 29.15 a | 0.028 |
| V/C ratio | 6.95 ± 1.16 | 5.15 ± 1.08 | 5.94 ± 0.91 | 6.24 ± 1.00 | 0.089 |
| Items 2 | Control | LPS | LPS + 1000 U/kg ALP | LPS + 5000 U/kg ALP | p Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 21 day | |||||
| Villus height, μm | 1004.92 ± 63.89 b | 739.24 ± 117.69 c | 1168.84 ± 114.78 ab | 1189.29 ± 110.00 a | <0.001 |
| Crypt depth, μm | 167.64 ± 21.02 b | 223.21 ± 24.94 a | 155.98 ± 7.33 b | 182.62 ± 14.31 b | 0.001 |
| V/C ratio | 6.00 ± 0.70 b | 3.31 ± 0.41 c | 7.49 ± 0.67 a | 6.51 ± 0.78 ab | <0.001 |
| 42 day | |||||
| Villus height, μm | 1161.57 ± 227.04 | 1081.35 ± 176.77 | 1183.99 ± 294.79 | 1210.28 ± 113.34 | 0.822 |
| Crypt depth, μm | 203.11 ± 40.73 | 245.82 ± 11.77 | 253.64 ± 65.46 | 231.35 ± 15.43 | 0.260 |
| V/C ratio | 5.81 ± 1.09 a | 4.38 ± 0.56 b | 4.69 ± 0.32 b | 5.24 ± 0.52 ab | 0.027 |
| Items 2 | Control | LPS | LPS + 1000 U/kg ALP | LPS + 5000 U/kg ALP | p Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 21 day | |||||
| IFN-γ | 1.06 ± 0.37 b | 1.60 ± 0.31 a | 1.69 ± 0.40 a | 1.37 ± 0.28 ab | 0.045 |
| IL-17 | 1.14 ± 0.62 a | 1.29 ± 0.73 a | 0.35 ± 0.11 b | 0.63 ± 0.46 ab | 0.044 |
| 42 day | |||||
| IFN-γ | 1.14 ± 0.62 | 1.98 ± 0.31 | 1.57 ± 0.48 | 1.39 ± 0.59 | 0.110 |
| IL-17 | 1.08 ± 0.43 b | 3.58 ± 0.87 a | 1.09 ± 0.55 b | 1.36 ± 0.25 b | <0.001 |
| Items 2 | Control | LPS | LPS + 1000 U/kg ALP | LPS + 5000 U/kg ALP | p Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 21 day | |||||
| Claudin-2 | 1.09 ± 0.49 | 1.02 ± 0.36 | 1.12 ± 0.41 | 1.22 ± 0.31 | 0.878 |
| Claudin-3 | 1.04 ± 0.32 b | 0.91 ± 0.27 b | 1.53 ± 0.26 a | 1.66 ± 0.29 a | 0.001 |
| Occludin | 1.01 ± 0.20 | 0.92 ± 0.13 | 0.95 ± 0.10 | 0.99 ± 0.15 | 0.770 |
| ZO-1 | 1.02 ± 0.22 | 0.94 ± 0.23 | 1.07 ± 0.35 | 1.15 ± 0.25 | 0.674 |
| ZO-2 | 1.03 ± 0.27 | 0.82 ± 0.25 | 1.16 ± 0.19 | 1.05 ± 0.25 | 0.208 |
| 42 day | |||||
| Claudin-2 | 1.04 ± 0.32 | 1.67 ± 0.90 | 1.49 ± 0.23 | 2.01 ± 1.00 | 0.214 |
| Claudin-3 | 1.02 ± 0.23 | 0.91 ± 0.48 | 0.91 ± 0.44 | 1.04 ± 0.54 | 0.948 |
| Occludin | 1.01 ± 0.16 a | 0.48 ± 0.19 b | 0.48 ± 0.15 b | 0.59 ± 0.33 b | 0.004 |
| ZO-1 | 1.00 ± 0.08 a | 0.61 ± 0.25 b | 0.95 ± 0.21 a | 0.93 ± 0.20 a | 0.022 |
| ZO-2 | 1.06 ± 0.37 a | 0.55 ± 0.12 b | 0.67 ± 0.26 ab | 0.93 ± 0.33 a | 0.044 |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2026 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license.
Share and Cite
Wang, Q.; Zhou, Y.; Qiu, Q.; Zhang, W.; Rajput, S.A.; Qi, D.; Lei, M. Alleviating the Adverse Effects of Lipopolysaccharide on Production Performance, Immune Function, and Intestinal Damage in Broilers via Dietary Alkaline Phosphatase. Animals 2026, 16, 1525. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani16101525
Wang Q, Zhou Y, Qiu Q, Zhang W, Rajput SA, Qi D, Lei M. Alleviating the Adverse Effects of Lipopolysaccharide on Production Performance, Immune Function, and Intestinal Damage in Broilers via Dietary Alkaline Phosphatase. Animals. 2026; 16(10):1525. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani16101525
Chicago/Turabian StyleWang, Qijun, Ying Zhou, Quan Qiu, Wei Zhang, Shahid Ali Rajput, Desheng Qi, and Minggang Lei. 2026. "Alleviating the Adverse Effects of Lipopolysaccharide on Production Performance, Immune Function, and Intestinal Damage in Broilers via Dietary Alkaline Phosphatase" Animals 16, no. 10: 1525. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani16101525
APA StyleWang, Q., Zhou, Y., Qiu, Q., Zhang, W., Rajput, S. A., Qi, D., & Lei, M. (2026). Alleviating the Adverse Effects of Lipopolysaccharide on Production Performance, Immune Function, and Intestinal Damage in Broilers via Dietary Alkaline Phosphatase. Animals, 16(10), 1525. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani16101525

