Natural Savannah Systems Within the “One Welfare” Approach: Part 1—Good Farmers’ Perspectives, Environmental Challenges and Opportunities
Simple Summary
Abstract
1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Ethical Considerations
2.2. General Description
2.3. Area of Study
2.4. Participants
2.5. Focus Groups
2.6. Data Analysis
2.7. Positionality and Reflexivity Statement
2.8. Data Presentation
3. Results
3.1. Demographics
3.2. Key Themes Identified
3.2.1. Theme 1: Socio-Cultural Factors Defining Human, Animal and Environmental Welfare “One Welfare”
Human Well-Being
- The family is the center of social unity in cattle-raising activities
- b.
- Life satisfaction
- c.
- Pride in tradition of the “good farmer”
Animal Welfare
- Link with human welfare and the profitability of livestock farming
- b.
- Traditional management
- c.
- Physical well-being and natural behavior
Environment
- Savannah conservation
3.2.2. Theme 2: Environmental Challenges Affecting Human and Animal Welfare
- Climate change
- b.
- Solid waste management and disposal
- c.
- Controlled burning
3.2.3. Theme 3: Welfare Improvement Opportunities with a “One Welfare” Vision
- Institutional dynamics
- b.
- Associativity
- c.
- Improving the quality of life in rural areas.
- d.
- Environmental governance of the territory
- e.
- Education
4. Discussion
5. Conclusions
Supplementary Materials
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Grace, J.; José, J.S.; Meir, P.; Miranda, H.S.; Montes, R.A. Productivity and Carbon Fluxes of Tropical Savannas. J. Biogeogr. 2006, 33, 387–400. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Perdinan; Tjahjono, R.E.P.; Infrawan, D.Y.D.; Armanto, A.N.; Pratiwi, S.D.; Putra, E.I.; Oktaviani, S.; Lestari, K.G.; Adi, R.F.; Sudiarno, A.R.; et al. Management Strategies of Tropical Savanna Ecosystem for Multiple Benefits of Community Livelihoods in Semiarid Region of Indonesia. World Dev. Sustain. 2024, 4, 100137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Peñuela, L.; Fernández, A. La Ganadería Ligada a Procesos de Conservación En La Sabana Inundable de La Orinoquia Livestock Activity Linked to Conservation Processes in the Orinoquia’s Flood Plains. Orinoquia 2010, 14, 5–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Parra, C. Estudio General de La Vegetación Nativa de Puerto Carreño (Vichada, Colombia). Caldasia 2006, 28, 165–177. [Google Scholar]
- Ramírez-Restrepo, C.A.; Vera-Infanzón, R.R.; Rao, I.M. Predicting Methane Emissions, Animal-Environmental Metrics and Carbon Footprint from Brahman (Bos Indicus) Breeding Herd Systems Based on Long-Term Research on Grazing of Neotropical Savanna and Brachiaria Decumbens Pastures. Agric. Syst. 2020, 184, 102892. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mincultura Cantos de Trabajo Del Llano. Available online: https://patrimonio.mincultura.gov.co/legislacion/Paginas/Cantos-de-trabajo-del-Llano.aspx#:~:text=Los%20cantos%20de%20trabajo%20de,arreo%20y%20orde%C3%B1o%20del%20ganado. (accessed on 13 January 2025).
- FAO. LA FAO y Los Objetivos de Desarrollo Sostenible-Cumplir La Agenda 2030 Mediante El Empoderamiento de Las Comunidades Locales; FAO: Roma, Italia, 2022; ISBN 978-92-5-137355-2. [Google Scholar]
- Campo, M.D.; Manteca, X.; de Lima, J.M.S.; Brito, G.; Hernández, P.; Sañudo, C.; Montossi, F. Effect of Different Finishing Strategies and Steer Temperament on Animal Welfare and Instrumental Meat Tenderness. Animals 2021, 11, 859. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Pinillos, R.G.; Appleby, M.C.; Manteca, X.; Scott-Park, F.; Smith, C.; Velarde, A. One Welfare—A Platform for Improving Human and Animal Welfare. Vet. Rec. 2016, 179, 412–413. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Garcia Pinillos, R. Onewelfare: A Framework to Improve Animal Welfare and Human Wellbeing; CABI: Wallingford, UK, 2018; ISBN 9780333227794. [Google Scholar]
- OMS One Health. Available online: https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/one-health (accessed on 13 January 2025).
- Lindenmayer, J.M.; Kaufman, G.E. One Health and One Welfare. In One Welfare in Practice the Role of the Veterinarian; Stephens, T., Ed.; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2021; pp. 1–30. ISBN 9780367904067. [Google Scholar]
- Acosta, A.; Nicolli, F.; Tirkaso, W. Cattle Ownership and Households’ Welfare: Evidence from Southern Africa. Glob. Food Secur. 2024, 42, 100772. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Vigors, B.; Wemelsfelder, F.; Lawrence, A.B. What Symbolises a “Good Farmer” When It Comes to Farm Animal Welfare? J. Rural. Stud. 2023, 98, 159–170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Vallance, S.; Espig, M.; Taylor, A.; Brosnahan, C.; McFetridge, A. Farmer Wellbeing and Animal Welfare: Exploring the Connections Using the Case of Facial Eczema. J. Rural. Stud. 2023, 104, 103140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Naylor, R.; Hamilton-Webb, A.; Little, R.; Maye, D. The ‘Good Farmer’: Farmer Identities and the Control of Exotic Livestock Disease in England. Sociol. Rural. 2018, 58, 3–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chan, K.W.; Enticott, G. Good Methods for Good Farmers? Mapping the Language of Good Farming with “Diligent Farmers” in Hong Kong. J. Rural. Stud. 2023, 100, 103005. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sutherland, L. Two Good Interview Questions: Mobilizing the ‘Good Farmer’ and the ‘Good Day’ Concepts to Enable More-than-representational Research. Sociol. Rural. 2021, 61, 681–703. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Logstein, B.; Bjørkhaug, H. Good Animal Welfare in Norwegian Farmers’ Context. Can Both Industrial and Natural Conventions Be Achieved in the Social License to Farm? J. Rural. Stud. 2023, 99, 107–120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sutherland, L.-A.; Calo, A. Assemblage and the ‘Good Farmer’: New Entrants to Crofting in Scotland. J. Rural. Stud. 2020, 80, 532–542. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Andreasen, S.; Sandøe, P.; Waiblinger, S.; Forkman, B. Negative Attitudes of Danish Dairy Farmers to Their Livestock Correlates Negatively with Animal Welfare. Anim. Welf. 2020, 29, 89–98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Opoku Mensah, S.; Akanpabadai, T.A.; Diko, S.K.; Okyere, S.A.; Benamba, C. Prioritization of Climate Change Adaptation Strategies by Smallholder Farmers in Semi-Arid Savannah Agro-Ecological Zones: Insights from the Talensi District, Ghana. J. Social. Econ. Dev. 2023, 25, 232–258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mohammed, K.; Batung, E.; Kansanga, M.; Nyantakyi-Frimpong, H.; Luginaah, I. Livelihood Diversification Strategies and Resilience to Climate Change in Semi-Arid Northern Ghana. Clim. Change 2021, 164, 53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Antwi-Agyei, P.; Abalo, E.M.; Dougill, A.J.; Baffour-Ata, F. Motivations, Enablers and Barriers to the Adoption of Climate-Smart Agricultural Practices by Smallholder Farmers: Evidence from the Transitional and Savannah Agroecological Zones of Ghana. Reg. Sustain. 2021, 2, 375–386. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ferreira, M.J.; Levis, C.; Chaves, L.; Clement, C.R.; Soldati, G.T. Indigenous and Traditional Management Creates and Maintains the Diversity of Ecosystems of South American Tropical Savannas. Front. Environ. Sci. 2022, 10, 809404. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Muñoz Escobar, M.; Fernández Lavado, A.P.; Montenegro Calvo, M.J.; García Ugarte, M.; Forero Azabache, O. Hacia Una Ganadería Sostenible En Vichada, Colombia. Instrumentos Políticos y Financieros. 2022. Available online: https://www.ufz.de/export/data/global/266736_DP_2022_4_Munoz_etal.pdf (accessed on 23 October 2024).
- Minagricultura. Plan Departamental de Extensión Agropecuaria 2020–2023; Departamento de Vichada: Vichada, Colombia, 2020. [Google Scholar]
- ICA Censos Pecuarios Nacional. Available online: https://www.ica.gov.co/areas/pecuaria/servicios/epidemiologia-veterinaria/censos-2016/censo-2018 (accessed on 23 October 2024).
- Ritter, C.; Koralesky, K.E.; Saraceni, J.; Roche, S.; Vaarst, M.; Kelton, D. Invited Review: Qualitative Research in Dairy Science—A Narrative Review. J. Dairy. Sci. 2023, 106, 5880–5895. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pitard, J. A Journey to the Centre of Self: Positioning the Researcher in Autoethnography. Qual. Social. Res. 2017, 3, 20. [Google Scholar]
- Williams, L.A. From Human Wellbeing to Animal Welfare. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 2021, 131, 941–952. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lyubomirsky, S.; Tkach, C.; DiMatteo, M.R. What Are the Differences between Happiness and Self-Esteem. Soc. Indic. Res. 2006, 78, 363–404. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ryff, C.D.; Singer, B.H. Know Thyself and Become What You Are: A Eudaimonic Approach to Psychological Well-Being. J. Happiness Stud. 2008, 9, 13–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Romero, M.H.; Barrero-Melendro, J.; Sanchez, J.A. Study of the Feasibility of Proposed Measures to Assess Animal Welfare for Zebu Beef Farms within Pasture-Based Systems under Tropical Conditions. Animals 2023, 13, 3659. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Martinez, A.; Donoso, E.; Hernández, R.O.; Sanchez, J.A.; Romero, M.H. Assessment of Animal Welfare in Fattening Pig Farms Certified in Good Livestock Practices. J. Appl. Anim. Welf. Sci. 2024, 27, 33–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Vigors, B.; Lawrence, A. What Are the Positives? Exploring Positive Welfare Indicators in a Qualitative Interview Study with Livestock Farmers. Animals 2019, 9, 694. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Rault, J.-L.; Hintze, S.; Camerlink, I.; Yee, J.R. Positive Welfare and the Like: Distinct Views and a Proposed Framework. Front. Vet. Sci. 2020, 7, 370. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Koç, G.; Uzmay, A. Determinants of Dairy Farmers’ Likelihood of Climate Change Adaptation in the Thrace Region of Turkey. Environ. Dev. Sustain. 2022, 24, 9907–9928. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nardone, A.; Ronchi, B.; Lacetera, N.; Ranieri, M.S.; Bernabucci, U. Effects of Climate Changes on Animal Production and Sustainability of Livestock Systems. Livest. Sci. 2010, 130, 57–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Phillips, C.J.C. Farm Animal Welfare—From the Farmers’ Perspective. Animals 2024, 14, 671. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rojas-Downing, M.M.; Nejadhashemi, A.P.; Harrigan, T.; Woznicki, S.A. Climate Change and Livestock: Impacts, Adaptation, and Mitigation. Clim. Risk Manag. 2017, 16, 145–163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shahbaz, P.; Boz, I.; ul Haq, S. Adaptation Options for Small Livestock Farmers Having Large Ruminants (Cattle and Buffalo) against Climate Change in Central Punjab Pakistan. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2020, 27, 17935–17948. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Vanegas-Cubillos, M.; Sylvester, J.; Villarino, E.; Pérez-Marulanda, L.; Ganzenmüller, R.; Löhr, K.; Bonatti, M.; Castro-Nunez, A. Forest Cover Changes and Public Policy: A Literature Review for Post-Conflict Colombia. Land Use Policy 2022, 114, 105981. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Baptiste, B.; Pinedo-Vasquez, M.; Gutierrez-Velez, V.H.; Andrade, G.I.; Vieira, P.; Estupiñán-Suárez, L.M.; Londoño, M.C.; Laurance, W.; Lee, T.M. Greening Peace in Colombia. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 2017, 1, 0102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Takahashi, B.; Gil Posse, C.; Sergeeva, M.; Salas, M.F.; Wojczynski, S.; Hartinger, S.; Yglesias-González, M. Climate Change and Public Health in South America: A Scoping Review of Governance and Public Engagement Research. Lancet Reg. Health—Am. 2023, 26, 100603. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Richerzhagen, C.; Rodríguez de Francisco, J.; Weinsheimer, F.; Döhnert, A.; Kleiner, L.; Mayer, M.; Morawietz, J.; Philipp, E. Ecosystem-Based Adaptation Projects, More than Just Adaptation: Analysis of Social Benefits and Costs in Colombia. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public. Health 2019, 16, 4248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Sepúlveda-Alzate, Y.M.; García-Benau, M.A.; Gómez-Villegas, M. Materiality Assessment: The Case of Latin American Listed Companies. Sustain. Account. Manag. Policy J. 2022, 13, 88–113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Schmidt, S.; Lamble, R.E.; Fensham, R.J.; Siddique, I. Effect of Woody Vegetation Clearing on Nutrient and Carbon Relations of Semi-Arid Dystrophic Savanna. Plant Soil. 2010, 331, 79–90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Durigan, G.; Pilon, N.A.L.; Abreu, R.C.R.; Hoffmann, W.A.; Martins, M.; Fiorillo, B.F.; Antunes, A.Z.; Carmignotto, A.P.; Maravalhas, J.B.; Vieira, J.; et al. No Net Loss of Species Diversity After Prescribed Fires in the Brazilian Savanna. Front. For. Glob. Change 2020, 3, 13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Haddad, T.M.; Viani, R.A.G.; Cava, M.G.B.; Durigan, G.; Veldman, J.W. Savannas after Afforestation: Assessment of Herbaceous Community Responses to Wildfire versus Native Tree Planting. Biotropica 2020, 52, 1206–1216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ramírez-Restrepo, C.A.; Vera, R.R.; Rao, I.M. Dynamics of Animal Performance, and Estimation of Carbon Footprint of Two Breeding Herds Grazing Native Neotropical Savannas in Eastern Colombia. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 2019, 281, 35–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Aniah, P.; Kaunza-Nu-Dem, M.K.; Ayembilla, J.A. Smallholder Farmers’ Livelihood Adaptation to Climate Variability and Ecological Changes in the Savanna Agro Ecological Zone of Ghana. Heliyon 2019, 5, e01492. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Maake, M.M.S.; Antwi, M.A. Farmer’s Perceptions of Effectiveness of Public Agricultural Extension Services in South Africa: An Exploratory Analysis of Associated Factors. Agric. Food Secur. 2022, 11, 34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Martini, E.; Pagella, T.; Mollee, E.; van Noordwijk, M. Relational Values in Locally Adaptive Farmer-to-Farmer Extension: How Important? Curr. Opin. Environ. Sustain. 2023, 65, 101363. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bizikova, L.; Nkonya, E.; Minah, M.; Hanisch, M.; Turaga, R.M.R.; Speranza, C.I.; Karthikeyan, M.; Tang, L.; Ghezzi-Kopel, K.; Kelly, J.; et al. A Scoping Review of the Contributions of Farmers’ Organizations to Smallholder Agriculture. Nat. Food 2020, 1, 620–630. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Kassem, H.S.; Alotaibi, B.A.; Muddassir, M.; Herab, A. Factors Influencing Farmers’ Satisfaction with the Quality of Agricultural Extension Services. Eval. Program. Plann 2021, 85, 101912. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Cash, D.W.; Belloy, P.G. Salience, Credibility and Legitimacy in a Rapidly Shifting World of Knowledge and Action. Sustainability 2020, 12, 7376. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- LaRue, K.; Daum, T.; Mausch, K.; Harris, D. Who Wants to Farm? Answers Depend on How You Ask: A Case Study on Youth Aspirations in Kenya. Eur. J. Dev. Res. 2021, 33, 885–909. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bourne, M.; de Bruyn, L.L.; Prior, J. Participatory versus Traditional Agricultural Advisory Models for Training Farmers in Conservation Agriculture: A Comparative Analysis from Kenya. J. Agric. Educ. Ext. 2021, 27, 153–174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Junquera, V.; Rubenstein, D.I.; Grêt-Regamey, A.; Knaus, F. Structural Change in Agriculture and Farmers’ Social Contacts: Insights from a Swiss Mountain Region. Agric. Syst. 2022, 200, 103435. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Albizua, A.; Bennett, E.; Pascual, U.; Larocque, G. The Role of the Social Network Structure on the Spread of Intensive Agriculture: An Example from Navarre, Spain. Reg. Environ. Change 2020, 20, 99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Burton, R.J.F. Seeing Through the ‘Good Farmer’s’ Eyes: Towards Developing an Understanding of the Social Symbolic Value of ‘Productivist’ Behaviour. Sociol. Rural. 2004, 44, 195–215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Stock, P.V.; Forney, J.; Emery, S.B.; Wittman, H. Neoliberal Natures on the Farm: Farmer Autonomy and Cooperation in Comparative Perspective. J. Rural. Stud. 2014, 36, 411–422. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wynne-Jones, S. Understanding Farmer Co-Operation: Exploring Practices of Social Relatedness and Emergent Affects. J. Rural. Stud. 2017, 53, 259–268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dohmwirth, C.; Hanisch, M. Women’s Active Participation and Gender Homogeneity: Evidence from the South Indian Dairy Cooperative Sector. J. Rural. Stud. 2019, 72, 125–135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Forney, J.; Häberli, I. Co-Operative Values beyond Hybridity: The Case of Farmers’ Organisations in the Swiss Dairy Sector. J. Rural. Stud. 2017, 53, 236–246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- ICA Resolución 1634 de 2010. Available online: https://www.ica.gov.co/areas/pecuaria/servicios/identifica/normas-identifica/resoluciones/ica/r1634 (accessed on 4 August 2024).
Characteristic | Female Farmers n (%) | Male Farmers n (%) | Institutions n (%) | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Gender | Male | “-” | 8 (33.3) | 6 (25) |
Female | 10 (41.7) | “-” | “-” | |
Age | 28–38 | 4 (16.7) | 2 (8.3) | “-” |
39–49 | 3 (12.5) | 3 (12.5) | 3 (12.5) | |
50–60 | 1 (4.2) | 1 (4.2) | 2 (8.3) | |
61–71 | 2 (8.3) | 2 (8.3) | 1 (4.2) | |
Level of education | No education | 1 (4.2) | 3 (12.5) | 0 (0) |
Primary | 3 (12.5) | 5 (20.8) | 2 (8.3) | |
Secondary | 4 (16.7) | “-” | “-” | |
Post-secondary | 2 (8.3) | “-” | 4 (16.7) | |
Years of experience | 20–30 | 4 (16.7) | 1 (4.2) | 1 (4.2) |
31–41 | 3 (12.5) | 3 (12.5) | 2 (8.3) | |
42–52 | 1 (4.2) | 2 (8.3) | 2 (8.3) | |
53–71 | 2 (8.3) | 2 (8.3) | 1 (4.2) |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2025 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Romero, M.H.; Gallego-Polania, S.A.; Sanchez, J.A. Natural Savannah Systems Within the “One Welfare” Approach: Part 1—Good Farmers’ Perspectives, Environmental Challenges and Opportunities. Animals 2025, 15, 677. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani15050677
Romero MH, Gallego-Polania SA, Sanchez JA. Natural Savannah Systems Within the “One Welfare” Approach: Part 1—Good Farmers’ Perspectives, Environmental Challenges and Opportunities. Animals. 2025; 15(5):677. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani15050677
Chicago/Turabian StyleRomero, Marlyn H., Sergio A. Gallego-Polania, and Jorge A. Sanchez. 2025. "Natural Savannah Systems Within the “One Welfare” Approach: Part 1—Good Farmers’ Perspectives, Environmental Challenges and Opportunities" Animals 15, no. 5: 677. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani15050677
APA StyleRomero, M. H., Gallego-Polania, S. A., & Sanchez, J. A. (2025). Natural Savannah Systems Within the “One Welfare” Approach: Part 1—Good Farmers’ Perspectives, Environmental Challenges and Opportunities. Animals, 15(5), 677. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani15050677