Next Article in Journal
The First Record of Taiga Shrew in Lithuania
Previous Article in Journal
Improved Eggshell Quality in Aged Hens Through Circadian Gut Microbiota and Metabolite Changes Induced by a 28-h Ahemeral Light Cycle
Previous Article in Special Issue
Unravelling Faecal Microbiota Variations in Equine Atypical Myopathy: Correlation with Blood Markers and Contribution of Microbiome
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Editorial

Happiness Is in the Field

by
Dominique-Marie Votion
Department of Functional Sciences, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Pharmacology and Toxicology, Fundamental and Applied Research for Animals & Health (FARAH), University of Liège, 4000 Liège, Belgium
Animals 2025, 15(21), 3087; https://doi.org/10.3390/ani15213087 (registering DOI)
Submission received: 6 August 2025 / Accepted: 18 August 2025 / Published: 24 October 2025
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Pasture-Associated Poisoning in Grazing Animals)

Editorial

Common sense suggests that ‘happiness is in the field’, as grasslands are considered environments that promote the health and well-being of grazing animals. However, they can present toxicological risks that are sometimes poorly known, so there is certainly a need to update our knowledge of pasture-associated poisoning.
This Special Issue gathers articles that explore both well-documented and emerging threats to livestock and horses linked to their grazing environment.
The collection includes case reports and investigations on acute poisonings caused by well-known toxic plants such as oak (Quercus spp.), where ingestion of large quantities of acorns can lead to death in both cattle [1] and horses [2,3]. Another study highlights the role of cyanogenic plants like sorghum, in which environmental stressors such as drought may exacerbate the production of toxins like dhurrin, triggering cyanide poisoning in cattle [4].
One of the most emblematic examples of a growing pasture-associated disease is equine atypical myopathy [5]. This condition, linked to ingestion of protoxins from seeds or seedlings of the sycamore maple (Acer pseudoplatanus), has emerged over the last two decades as a major cause of death in pastured horses across Europe. Although A. pseudoplatanus is considered an indigenous tree, its role in pasture toxicity was only recognised a decade ago [6]. Moreover, this syndrome is no longer restricted to horses as A. pseudoplatanus poisoning has been confirmed in other species [7,8,9,10]. This illustrates that pasture poisoning is not a static phenomenon: it is shaped by changing ecosystems, grazing behaviour [11], and climate changes. Insights into the equine faecal microbiota in the context of atypical myopathy suggest that gut microbial activity may modulate toxin metabolism and susceptibility [12]. Understanding these host–toxin interactions could open up new approaches to prevention.
Environmental toxicology also encompasses chronic and subclinical exposures. One study in this issue assesses the concentrations of toxic and essential trace elements in cow’s milk in north-eastern Brazil, showing that proximity to major roads correlates with high levels of lead in milk, a potential public health problem [13]. Such findings remind us that contamination does not always present as acute disease but can emerge insidiously through bioaccumulation and long-term exposure.
Throughout history, toxic threats have evolved, from classic cases involving heavy metals [14,15] to current concerns such as pesticides [16] and per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) [17]. Effective management of pasture-associated poisoning requires both robust diagnostic tools [18] and a mechanistic understanding of toxic processes [19], enabling not just treatment but prevention [20].
As the welfare of grazing animals is intimately linked to pasture [21,22,23], we need to ensure that pasture remains a safe environment, whether for leisure animals or for livestock in food production systems. This Special Issue reminds us of the necessity to be aware of the risks associated with pasture to strengthen our ability to protect animal health in an ever-changing environment.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Eppe, J.; Bayrou, C.; Casalta, H.; Cassart, D.; Gille, L.; Stipulanti, M.; Versyp, J.; Sartelet, A. Oak Acorn Poisoning in Cattle during Autumn 2022: A Case Series and Review of the Current Knowledge. Animals 2023, 13, 2678. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Smith, S.; Naylor, R.J.; Knowles, E.J.; Mair, T.S.; Cahalan, S.D.; Fews, D.; Dunkel, B. Suspected acorn toxicity in nine horses. Equine Vet. J. 2015, 47, 568–572. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Hermange, T.; Ruault, B.; Couroucé, A. Retrospective Study of 25 Cases of Acorn Intoxication Colitis in Horses between 2011 and 2018 and Factors Associated with Non-Survival. Animals 2024, 14, 599. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Giantin, S.; Franzin, A.; Brusa, F.; Montemurro, V.; Bozzetta, E.; Caprai, E.; Fedrizzi, G.; Girolami, F.; Nebbia, C. Overview of Cyanide Poisoning in Cattle from Sorghum halepense and S. bicolor Cultivars in Northwest Italy. Animals 2024, 14, 743. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. François, A.C.; Renaud, B.; Kruse, C.J.; Marcillaud-Pitel, C.; Votion, D.M. An ongoing concern: 20 years of research on equine atypical myopathy. Vet. Rec. 2024, 195, e5039. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Votion, D.M.; van Galen, G.; Sweetman, L.; Boemer, F.; de Tullio, P.; Dopagne, C.; Lefere, L.; Mouithys-Mickalad, A.; Patarin, F.; Rouxhet, S.; et al. Identification of methylenecyclopropyl acetic acid in serum of European horses with atypical myopathy. Equine Vet. J. 2014, 46, 146–149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Renaud, B.; Kruse, C.J.; François, A.C.; Grund, L.; Bunert, C.; Brisson, L.; Boemer, F.; Gault, G.; Ghislain, B.; Petitjean, T.; et al. Acer pseudoplatanus: A Potential Risk of Poisoning for Several Herbivore Species. Toxins 2022, 14, 512. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Hirz, M.; Gregersen, H.A.; Sander, J.; Votion, D.M.; Schanzer, A.; Kohler, K.; Herden, C. Atypical myopathy in 2 Bactrian camels. J. Vet. Diagn. Investig. 2021, 33, 961–965. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Bunert, C.; Langer, S.; Votion, D.M.; Boemer, F.; Muller, A.; Ternes, K.; Liesegang, A. Atypical myopathy in Pere David’s deer (Elaphurus davidianus) associated with ingestion of hypoglycin A. J. Anim. Sci. 2018, 96, 3537–3547. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Bochnia, M.; Ziemssen, E.; Sander, J.; Stief, B.; Zeyner, A. Methylenecyclopropylglycine and hypoglycin A intoxication in three Pere David’s Deers (Elaphurus davidianus) with atypical myopathy. Vet. Med. Sci. 2020, 7, 998–1005. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Aboling, S. Do Poisonous Plants in Pastures Communicate Their Toxicity? Meta-Study and Evaluation of Poisoning Cases in Central Europe. Animals 2023, 13, 3795. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. François, A.C.; Cesarini, C.; Taminiau, B.; Renaud, B.; Kruse, C.J.; Boemer, F.; van Loon, G.; Palmers, K.; Daube, G.; Wouters, C.P.; et al. Unravelling Faecal Microbiota Variations in Equine Atypical Myopathy: Correlation with Blood Markers and Contribution of Microbiome. Animals 2025, 15, 354. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Oliveira Filho, E.F.; López-Alonso, M.; Vieira Marcolino, G.; Castro Soares, P.; Herrero-Latorre, C.; Lopes de Mendonça, C.; de Azevedo Costa, N.; Miranda, M. Factors Affecting Toxic and Essential Trace Element Concentrations in Cow’s Milk Produced in the State of Pernambuco, Brazil. Animals 2023, 13, 2465. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Angon, P.B.; Islam, M.S.; Kc, S.; Das, A.; Anjum, N.; Poudel, A.; Suchi, S.A. Sources, effects and present perspectives of heavy metals contamination: Soil, plants and human food chain. Heliyon 2024, 10, e28357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Jomova, K.; Alomar, S.Y.; Nepovimova, E.; Kuca, K.; Valko, M. Heavy metals: Toxicity and human health effects. Arch. Toxicol. 2025, 99, 153–209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Garud, A.; Pawar, S.; Patil, M.S.; Kale, S.R.; Patil, S. A Scientific Review of Pesticides: Classification, Toxicity, Health Effects, Sustainability, and Environmental Impact. Cureus 2024, 16, e67945. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Bonato, T.; Pal, T.; Benna, C.; Di Maria, F. Contamination of the terrestrial food chain by per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) and related human health risks: A systematic review. Sci. Total Environ. 2025, 961, 178337. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Draghi, S.; Fehri, N.E.; Ateş, F.; Özsobacı, N.P.; Tarhan, D.; Bilgiç, B.; Dokuzeylül, B.; Yaramış, Ç.P.; Ercan, A.M.; Or, M.E.; et al. Use of Hair as Matrix for Trace Elements Biomonitoring in Cattle and Roe Deer Sharing Pastures in Northern Italy. Animals 2024, 14, 2209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Sander, J.; Terhardt, M.; Janzen, N.; Renaud, B.; Kruse, C.J.; Francois, A.C.; Wouters, C.P.; Boemer, F.; Votion, D.M. Tissue Specific Distribution and Activation of Sapindaceae Toxins in Horses Suffering from Atypical Myopathy. Animals 2023, 13, 2410. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Renaud, B.; Kruse, C.J.; François, A.C.; Cesarini, C.; van Loon, G.; Palmers, K.; Boemer, F.; Luis, G.; Gustin, P.; Votion, D.M. Large-scale study of blood markers in equine atypical myopathy reveals subclinical poisoning and advances in diagnostic and prognostic criteria. Environ. Toxicol. Pharmacol. 2024, 110, 104515. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Mee, J.F.; Boyle, L.A. Assessing whether dairy cow welfare is “better” in pasture-based than in confinement-based management systems. N. Z. Vet. J. 2020, 68, 168–177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Arnott, G.; Ferris, C.P.; O’Connell, N.E. Review: Welfare of dairy cows in continuously housed and pasture-based production systems. Animal 2017, 11, 261–273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Hitchens, P.L.; Hultgren, J.; Frössling, J.; Emanuelson, U.; Keeling, L.J. An epidemiological analysis of equine welfare data from regulatory inspections by the official competent authorities. Animal 2017, 11, 1237–1248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Votion, D.-M. Happiness Is in the Field. Animals 2025, 15, 3087. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani15213087

AMA Style

Votion D-M. Happiness Is in the Field. Animals. 2025; 15(21):3087. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani15213087

Chicago/Turabian Style

Votion, Dominique-Marie. 2025. "Happiness Is in the Field" Animals 15, no. 21: 3087. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani15213087

APA Style

Votion, D.-M. (2025). Happiness Is in the Field. Animals, 15(21), 3087. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani15213087

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Article metric data becomes available approximately 24 hours after publication online.
Back to TopTop