Next Article in Journal
Characteristics of the Gut Microbiota in Different Segments of the Gastrointestinal Tract of Big-Eyed Bamboo Snake (Pseudoxenodon macrops)
Previous Article in Journal
Comparison of the Life History of and Morphological Differences in Eight Korean Tiger Beetles Reared in the Laboratory to Develop an Ex Situ Conservation Method for the Endangered Tiger Beetle
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Genomic Insights into Genetic Diversity and Adaptation of Nanyang Cattle: Implications for Conservation and Breeding

1
College of Animal Science and Technology, Henan Agricultural University, Zhengzhou 450046, China
2
Henan Animal Husbandry Station, Zhengzhou 450008, China
3
Tongbai County Agriculture and Rural Bureau, Nanyang 474750, China
4
Henan Provincial Seed Industry Development Center, Zhengzhou 450046, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Animals 2025, 15(20), 3033; https://doi.org/10.3390/ani15203033
Submission received: 2 September 2025 / Revised: 9 October 2025 / Accepted: 16 October 2025 / Published: 19 October 2025
(This article belongs to the Section Animal Genetics and Genomics)

Simple Summary

Nanyang cattle are one of China’s most valuable local breeds, known for their strength, calm temperament, and ability to survive in harsh environments. Yet, like many traditional animals, they face threats from modern farming practices that can reduce genetic diversity, meaning the range of traits passed from one generation to the next. In this study, we compared two groups of Nanyang cattle: one maintained in an official conservation program and another living freely in mountain regions. We found that both groups share the same origins, but the free-ranging cattle preserved more natural variation and genes linked to disease resistance and adaptation, while the conservation group showed stronger effects of human selection for traits such as growth. Notably, 170 genes were identified as playing important roles in environmental adaptation. These results show that conserving Nanyang cattle requires a careful balance between improving productivity and preserving natural resilience. Protecting the genetic resources of this breed will not only help today’s farmers but also safeguard future food security and ensure the sustainability of livestock farming.

Abstract

The conservation of agricultural animal resources holds significant importance for addressing future breeding demands and promoting sustainable utilization of regional livestock genetic resources. As one of China’s five major fine cattle breeds, Nanyang cattle exhibit notable characteristics, including strong adaptability and a docile temperament. Through whole-genome comparative analysis of the Nanyang cattle core conservation population and free-ranging populations in mountainous areas, this study systematically investigated the genetic diversity, population structure, and adaptive evolutionary mechanisms of this indigenous Chinese cattle breed. Population structure analysis revealed that both groups belong to a single genetic lineage of Nanyang cattle without significant genetic differentiation; however, the free-ranging population demonstrated a slower linkage disequilibrium decay rate. Combined FST and θπ ratio analyses identified 170 positively selected genes, with KEGG enrichment highlighting glutamatergic synapse and African trypanosomiasis immune pathways. PLCB4, as a shared gene across both pathways, may exert pleiotropic functions in environmental adaptation. The core conservation population likely exhibits reduced diversity in neuroplasticity-related genes under artificial selection, whereas the free-ranging population retained more genes associated with environmental adaptation and immune response. These findings provide genomic evidence for formulating differentiated conservation strategies for Nanyang cattle, necessitating balanced co-optimization of production trait breeding and natural adaptability preservation.

1. Introduction

Domestic cattle (Bos primigenius taurus) are taxonomically classified into two major lineages: taurine (Bos taurus) and zebu (Bos indicus), both belonging to the genus Bos within the family Bovidae of the order Artiodactyla [1]. As one of the most globally significant domesticated animals, the conservation of cattle genetic resources holds exceptional biological and agricultural importance [2]. With wild ancestors (e.g., the aurochs, Bos primigenius) now extinct, their genetic diversity relies entirely on extant populations, establishing domestic cattle as a model system for biodiversity conservation studies. Livestock breeds constitute intentionally developed subpopulations shaped by founder events, genetic isolation, and directed selection, thereby preserving rare genetic adaptations to specific environments. This conservation paradigm manifests most notably in autochthonous breeds such as the low-input foraging-adapted Buša cattle of the Balkans [3], the tick-resistant Criollo cattle of the Americas [4], and the high-altitude acclimatized Tibetan cattle of China [5]. Collectively, these examples highlight the pivotal role of local breeds as living repositories of genetic and adaptive biodiversity.
China harbors one of the world’s richest repositories of bovine genetic resources, characterized by millennia of domestication and extensive variation within Bos taurus populations [6,7]. Through millennia of natural and artificial selection, including targeted hybridization events between Bos taurus and Bos indicus subspecies, numerous autochthonous cattle breeds have emerged with distinct adaptations to diverse ecological zones. Among these, the Nanyang cattle—recognized as one of China’s five principal yellow cattle breeds and historically pivotal as draft animals in agrarian societies—holds inclusion in the National Catalog of Livestock and Poultry Genetic Resources (Supplementary Figure S1). Population genetic analyses demonstrate that Nanyang cattle descend from hybrid ancestry between Bos taurus and Bos indicus lineages [8], conferring resilience to environmental stress and robust production potential. To safeguard this valuable genetic resource, the local government established a conservation farm dedicated to the systematic preservation and breeding of Nanyang cattle, while simultaneously implementing policies that encourage farmers to continue raising and utilizing the breed. After several decades of development under these contrasting management and rearing regimes, the two populations may have diverged in terms of genetic diversity and adaptive potential. To verify this hypothesis, we conducted whole-genome resequencing (WGS) to systematically evaluate the genetic structure and adaptive potential of these two Nanyang cattle populations.
Recent advances in WGS technology have revolutionized livestock genomics by overcoming the limitations of traditional molecular markers. WGS enables comprehensive detection of structural variants and selection signatures across the entire genome [9,10], thereby providing powerful insights into adaptive mechanisms of indigenous breeds. As sequencing costs continue to decline alongside refinements in bioinformatic methodologies, this approach has been successfully deployed in model systems ranging from thermotolerance adaptation in Chinese cattle to high-altitude acclimatization in Tibetan cattle [11,12], demonstrating that environmental adaptation phenotypes exhibit definable genomic footprints. Such technological evolution is fundamentally reshaping research paradigms within domestic animal genetics—shifting from singular phenotypic characterization toward integrated genome-phenome analyses, and transitioning from localized marker studies to genome-wide selective sweep investigations.
Despite the long domestication history and economic importance of Nanyang cattle, little is known about how distinct management systems—government-managed conservation farms versus traditional farmer-based rearing—have shaped their genomic diversity and adaptive potential. To address this gap, we performed WGS on two representative Nanyang populations: 30 individuals from the conservation farm (nanyang_A) and 17 free-ranging individuals from mountainous regions (nanyang_B). Using the Bos taurus reference genome (ARS-UCD1.3), we characterized genome-wide variation, resolved population structure, and identified regions under selection through fixation index (FST) and nucleotide diversity ratio (θπ ratio) analyses. Functional annotation and KEGG pathway enrichment analyses were further conducted to reveal potential adaptive mechanisms. By integrating population genomics with functional annotation, this study provides a comprehensive understanding of genetic differentiation and adaptive evolution in Nanyang cattle under contrasting management conditions. The findings offer a mechanistic foundation for evidence-based conservation strategies, adaptive trait utilization, and the sustainable genetic improvement of indigenous cattle breeds.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Samples

A total of 47 ear tissue samples were collected from Nanyang cattle, with all sampling procedures following strict disinfection protocols using 75% ethanol before and after tissue extraction. The cohort comprised 30 individuals from the core conservation population in Nanyang (designated nanyang_A) and 17 free-ranging individuals from smallholder herds in mountainous areas (designated nanyang_B). All samples were obtained with documented informed consent from owners, ensuring compliance with established ethical standards for subsequent genomic data analyses.

2.2. Sequencing

Genomic DNA was extracted from auricular tissue samples of Nanyang cattle using the phenol-chloroform method. DNA integrity and yield were assessed by agarose gel electrophoresis and quantified using a NanoDrop spectrophotometer. Qualified DNA samples were used to construct 300-bp insert size paired-end libraries, which were subsequently sequenced on the DNBSEQ-T7 platform (MGI, CN). Raw fastq files underwent quality control processing with Trimmomatic [13] to generate clean reads. These clean reads were then aligned to the Bos taurus reference genome (ARS-UCD1.3) using the BWA-MEM [14] algorithm (v0.7.17-r1188) under default parameters. PCR duplicates were marked and removed using the MarkDuplicates (v2.27.3) module in Picard (https://broadinstitute.github.io/picard/, accessed on 15 October 2025). Local realignment around indels was performed using GATK [15] v3.8′s IndelRealigner. Initial variant calling was conducted with the GATK UnifiedGenotyper module. Detected variants were filtered based on the following criteria: QD < 2.0, FS > 60.0, MQ < 40.0, MQRankSum < −12.5, ReadPosRankSum < −8.0, and SOR > 3.0. The resulting variant set was converted from VCF to PLINK format using VCFtools (v0.1.16) [16]. Finally, quality control filtering was performed using PLINK (v1.90) [17], and a total of 63,069,870 SNPs were obtained from 47 individuals. We removed SNPs with minor allele frequency < 0.05 and Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium less than 10−6 were excluded. Additionally, individuals with >10% missing genotypes were excluded to ensure data robustness. A total of 32,014,481 high-quality SNPs were retained for subsequent analysis.

2.3. Genetic Diversity Analysis

Genetic variants in the Nanyang cattle populations were functionally annotated using SnpEff 5.1d [18], with results visualized via the ggplot2 (v3.5.2) package in R [19]. Pairwise genetic distances between individuals were derived from identity-by-state (IBS) matrices generated by PLINK, followed by matrix visualization in R. For runs of homozygosity (ROH) detection, autosomal scans were performed via PLINK’s -homozyg sliding-window algorithm. Detected ROH segments were categorized into four length-based classes (300–500 kb, 500–700 kb, 700–900 kb, and >900 kb) to compute the inbreeding coefficient (FROH). All resultant data were visualized using ggplot2.

2.4. Population Structure Analysis

A kinship matrix was constructed from genome-wide SNP data across all populations using PLINK. PCA was performed, with the first two principal components (PC1 and PC2)—capturing the highest proportion of genetic variance—serving as orthogonal axes for population stratification visualization via the ggplot2 package in R. Genetic distances between populations were computed to generate a distance matrix (tree.mat), which was subsequently converted to Newick format (.nwk) using R for phylogenetic reconstruction. The resulting topology was visualized in FigTree v1.4.4 (http://tree.bio.ed.ac.uk/software/figtree/, accessed on 8 January 2025) to illustrate evolutionary relationships. Linkage disequilibrium (LD) decay within the Nanyang cattle cohort was analyzed using PopLDdecay (v3.42) [20], where LD intensity (r2) between pairwise SNPs was regressed against physical distance to generate LD decay curves. Population structure inference was conducted via ADMIXTURE (v1.3.0) [21], implementing a maximum-likelihood framework to estimate ancestry proportions and identify genetic subdivisions among subpopulations.

2.5. Selective Signature Analysis and Functional Enrichment

Quality control of VCF-format genomic data for the Nanyang cattle cohort was performed using PLINK. Genome-wide scans for selection signatures were conducted by integrating two complementary metrics: the FST and θπ ratio. Both statistics were computed via sliding-window analyses (window size: 50 kb; step size: 20 kb) implemented in VCFtools. Genomic regions simultaneously ranked within the top 1% of both metrics were designated as candidate selective sweeps. Functional annotation of genes within these regions was performed using SnpEff 5.1d with a custom-built genomic annotation database. Significantly enriched KEGG pathways were identified via the KOBAS 3.0 platform [22], applying a false discovery rate (FDR) threshold of <0.05 for multiple testing correction. Resultant pathway enrichment profiles were visualized using R-based plotting packages.

3. Results

3.1. Descriptive Statistics of SNP Loci from Whole-Genome Resequencing Data

Whole-genome resequencing was performed on 47 Nanyang cattle (comprising Nanyang population A: n = 30; population B: n = 17). Reads were aligned to the reference genome (ARS-UCD1.3) using BWA, achieving a mean alignment rate > 99% and mean coverage depth > 10× (Supplementary Table S1). Subsequent analyses demonstrated high accuracy and reliability based on these quality-controlled alignments. A total of 32,014,481 high-quality SNPs were identified across all samples, with chromosomal distributions illustrated in Figure 1A. SNP density exhibited homogeneity among chromosomes and showed a strong positive correlation with chromosome size: larger chromosomes contained more SNPs while smaller ones possessed fewer. Chromosome 1 harbored the maximum number of SNPs (1,873,881), as depicted in Figure 1B. Functional annotation (Figure 1C) revealed that SNPs in the Nanyang cattle genome were predominantly located in intergenic regions (50%) and intron variants (37.02%), whereas synonymous variants and missense variants accounted for lower proportions at 0.44% and 0.27%, respectively.

3.2. Genomic Genetic Diversity Statistics

Analysis of IBS genetic distance matrices provides a robust approach to delineate population genetic architecture in the absence of well-documented pedigrees or ancestral genotypes. As depicted in Figure 2, pairwise IBS genetic distances within the nanyang_A ranged from 0 to 0.28, with a mean value of 0.23 ± 0.05 (Figure 2A). Similarly, distances within the nanyang_B spanned 0 to 0.28, averaging 0.23 ± 0.06 (Figure 2B). Analysis of ROH distribution revealed that nanyang_A exhibited a significantly higher proportion of short ROH segments compared to nanyang_B, whereas the latter showed a marked enrichment in long ROH segments (Figure 2C). Genomic inbreeding coefficients FROH, calculated as the ratio of total ROH length to autosomal genome length (2.81 Gb, ARS-UCD1.3), demonstrated distinct patterns: nanyang_A displayed FROH values ranging from 0.014 to 0.082 (mean: 0.041 ± 0.018), while nanyang_B exhibited higher values from 0.027 to 0.125 (mean: 0.066 ± 0.030, Figure 2D). These results indicate elevated recent inbreeding in the free-ranging cohort, consistent with reduced genetic exchange in isolated mountainous habitats.

3.3. Population Structure Analysis

To elucidate the genetic divergence between the nanyang_A and nanyang_B of Nanyang cattle, population genetic structure analyses were performed on 47 individuals. PCA and NJ tree construction revealed no significant genetic differentiation, with individuals from both cohorts coalescing into a monophyletic cluster (Figure 3A,B). Analysis of LD decay rates demonstrated marginally stronger SNP linkage persistence in nanyang_B relative to nanyang_A, quantified by slower r2 decay (Figure 3C). Ancestral component decomposition via ADMIXTURE at K = 2 further confirmed the absence of distinct genetic stratification, indicating cohesive ancestral contributions across both cohorts consistent with a unified Nanyang cattle population (Figure 3D).

3.4. Selective Signature Analysis and Functional Enrichment

To investigate genomic signatures of selection between the nanyang_A and nanyang_B of Nanyang cattle, we employed FST and θπ ratio analyses (Figure 4A,B). Genomic windows with signals in the top 1% of the whole-genome distribution for both metrics were defined as candidate selective sweep regions. This approach identified 527 candidate genes from FST peaks and 427 from θπ ratio outliers, with 170 genes overlapping between the two methods (Figure 4C). KEGG pathway enrichment analysis of these shared genes (Figure 4D, corrected p < 0.05) revealed significant overrepresentation in glutamatergic synapse (encompassing HOMER1, HOMER2, PLCB4, and ADCY9) and African trypanosomiasis (containing SELE, MYD88, and PLCB4). The dual involvement of PLCB4 in neuroexcitatory transmission and immune response pathways suggests its pleiotropic role in environmental adaptation mechanisms.

4. Discussion

Livestock genetic resources constitute a strategic foundation for ensuring national food security and revitalizing the seed industry [23]. As a nationally protected genetic resource listed in the National Catalog of Livestock and Poultry Genetic Resources, Nanyang cattle (Bos taurus) serve as a vital model for assessing conservation efficacy in indigenous Chinese breeds. In 1996, the Nanyang cattle population peaked at approximately 2.4 million head but subsequently declined. By the end of 2005, the total population had decreased to 1.918 million, including 213,000 adult bulls and 793,000 adult cows, with artificial insemination as the predominant breeding method. The Third National Livestock and Poultry Genetic Resources Survey, completed in 2023, reported that the number of Nanyang cattle in their primary distribution areas had plummeted to just over 14,000, underscoring the urgency of conservation efforts.
Currently, to protect livestock genetic resources from the influence of exotic breeds, conservation farms typically employ closed herd breeding strategies. Therefore, studying the population structure of conserved groups is crucial for their sustainable development. The IBS-based genetic distance matrix allows analysis even when the pedigree of samples or ancestral information is unclear. In this study, the pairwise IBS genetic distances within both the core conservation Nanyang cattle population (nanyang_A) and the free-ranging mountainous population (nanyang_B) ranged from 0 to 0.28, with no significant differences in mean values. Based on these results, we infer that nanyang_A and nanyang_B have not diverged into distinct populations.
ROH refers to continuous homozygous segments in diploid genomes, where long ROH segments signify recent inbreeding events, while short segments reflect ancestral genetic contributions [24,25]. The FROH demonstrated significantly lower values in nanyang_A than in nanyang_B. Within the core conservation group, deliberate measures to protect Nanyang cattle genetic resources actively prevent large-scale inbreeding; in contrast, free-ranging herds exhibit inherently elevated inbreeding levels (Figure 2D) due to farmers’ economic incentives favoring minimal financial investment for returns, resulting in natural mating practices that exacerbate genetic homogeneity.
Population structure analyses revealed that both the nanyang_A and nanyang_B of Nanyang cattle share congruent genetic backgrounds without significant divergence, confirming their classification as a unified genetic population. Although Nanyang cattle are listed in the National Catalog of Livestock and Poultry Genetic Resources with governmental policy and financial support [26], conservation programs must simultaneously preserve genetic diversity and prevent excessive inbreeding [27]. This necessitates the strategic introduction of locally sourced Nanyang cattle individuals to maintain acceptable inbreeding coefficients within managed breeding populations.
To investigate the selective signatures between the core conservation population and free-range population, we performed selection signal analyses on nanyang_A and nanyang_B using FST and θπ ratio approaches. Functional annotation of the significant genomic regions identified by both methods revealed 170 overlapping genes. KEGG enrichment analysis demonstrated significant enrichment (corrected p < 0.05) in two pathways: glutamatergic synapse and African trypanosomiasis. The glutamatergic synapse pathway, serving as the primary excitatory neurotransmission system in the central nervous system, is closely associated with neurological health and disorders [28,29]. Adaptive evolution of neurodevelopmental genes enhances organisms’ physiological adaptability to environmental stressors, thereby reducing stress-induced growth inhibition [30]. While direct evidence in Nanyang cattle is lacking, these genes may represent potential candidates for investigating neurological regulation of metabolism or stress responses, which could be indirectly related to production traits. Within this pathway, HOMER1 regulates myofiber differentiation [31], HOMER2 associates with microgravity-induced muscular atrophy [32], and ADCY9-mediated cAMP signaling maintains muscle mass and function [33]. These functional roles suggest that allelic variation in these genes may contribute to maintaining performance under challenging environmental or management conditions. African trypanosomiasis pathway genes predominantly govern humoral immune responses: SELE acts as a lymphangiogenic receptor on lymphatic endothelial cells [34], MYD88 is essential for innate immunity, where aberrant activation promotes inflammatory cytokine production and tumor progression [35], PLCB4—a shared gene across both pathways—serves as a key regulator of IP3 and DAG, potent second messengers critical for cell proliferation and immune signaling [36,37]. We further speculate that polymorphisms in these immune-related genes may confer differential resistance to parasitic or environmental stressors in Nanyang cattle, supporting survival in free-ranging or resource-limited settings. Collectively, these analyses suggest that the identified pathways could underlie adaptive traits relevant to both metabolic efficiency and environmental resilience. While these interpretations remain hypothetical, they provide a framework for future functional studies, such as stress-challenged transcriptomics or metabolomics, to validate how these variants influence physiological and adaptive responses.
This genomic investigation delineates the genetic characteristics of Nanyang cattle core conservation (nanyang_A; n = 30) and free-ranging mountainous populations (nanyang_B; n = 17), yet methodological limitations warrant refinement. Constrained by cohort size and sampling conditions, the restricted sample size, coupled with limited environmental heterogeneity and potential gene flow between cohorts, may compromise the statistical power of population genetic inferences [38,39]. This limitation reduces the ability to detect selection signals and population differentiation, particularly for variants with small effects or uneven distribution, which may result in genuine signals being overlooked. In addition, it can amplify the impact of genetic drift and sampling error, broadening confidence intervals for allele frequency estimates and increasing the likelihood of false positives. Furthermore, we acknowledge that aligning reads to the Bos taurus ARS-UCD1.3 reference genome may introduce slight reference allele bias due to the Bos indicus ancestry of Nanyang cattle. While genome-wide patterns such as FST and θπ ratio are expected to remain largely robust, local diversity estimates and selection signals could be subtly affected. Future studies could consider using a B. indicus reference genome or a pangenome approach to further validate these findings. Subsequent studies should quantify genetic relatedness between populations, expand sampling scales to enhance the reliability of selection signal detection, and incorporate phylogenetically proximal local breeds to elucidate gene flow dynamics. Although neuro-immunological candidate genes were identified, their mechanistic roles in shaping environmental adaptations remain unverified experimentally. Future investigations could incorporate specific multi-omics approaches, such as transcriptomics under stress-challenged conditions to reveal dynamic expression patterns of key genes, proteomics to resolve regulatory networks of immune- and neuro-related pathways, and metabolomics to trace metabolite changes associated with environmental adaptation. At the functional level, candidate genes may be validated through gene editing techniques (e.g., CRISPR/Cas9), cell-based assays, and animal models, thereby providing stronger evidence for their causal roles in shaping adaptive traits and informing genetic improvement. Such integrative strategies will facilitate the comprehensive exploitation of Nanyang cattle genetic resources and support the sustainable utilization of this regionally distinctive livestock breed.
As a valuable indigenous genetic resource in China, Nanyang cattle exhibit distinctive advantages in adaptability and genetic diversity [26,40]. Against the backdrop of progressive depletion in existing bovine genetic resources, research on this precious local breed enables a comprehensive investigation of its genetic architecture and adaptability mechanisms, providing a solid foundation for future studies targeting economically important traits. Looking ahead, conservation of Nanyang cattle should integrate genomic insights to implement differentiated strategies: introducing gene flow from free-ranging mountainous individuals into the core conservation population to enhance genetic diversity, while establishing ecological reserves to preserve the natural adaptive traits of the free-ranging cohort. In parallel, developing a genomic resource bank to regularly monitor key adaptive genes (e.g., PLCB4), balancing economic traits with stress resistance in breeding programs, and promoting long-term preservation through policy support and farmer participation will ensure sustainable utilization of this valuable genetic resource.

5. Conclusions

This study employed whole-genome analysis to uncover genetic distinctions within Nanyang cattle populations under different environments. Both nucleotide diversity and inbreeding coefficients in the core conservation population were lower than those in the free-ranging population. Population structure analysis confirmed that both groups belong to the same genetic lineage. Selection signature analysis identified 170 positively selected genes significantly enriched in glutamatergic synapse and immune-related pathways, with the PLCB4 gene potentially exerting pleiotropic functions in environmental adaptation. Interpretations are constrained by the relatively small sample size, which may limit generalizability, and the functional links of candidate genes remain speculative, warranting validation through future functional assays. Despite these limitations, our findings provide a valuable genomic foundation for guiding conservation strategies. Future initiatives could integrate key candidate gene information with enhanced breeding and mating management to balance production trait improvement with the preservation of natural adaptability, thereby promoting sustainable population development.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/ani15203033/s1, Figure S1: Nanyang cattle from two populations: the core conservation population (nanyang_A, left) and the free-ranging population (nanyang_B, right); Table S1:Overview of whole genome sequencing data of Nanyang cattle.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, D.L. and T.G.; methodology, Y.Z.; investigation, Y.Z., X.L. and J.L.; resources, X.L., J.L., T.F., H.H., M.H. and T.G.; data curation, Y.Z.; writing—original draft preparation, Y.Z.; writing—review and editing, Y.Z., H.H., D.L. and T.G.; visualization, Y.Z.; supervision, T.F., D.L. and T.G.; project administration, X.L., J.L., T.F., H.H., M.H., D.L. and T.G.; funding acquisition, X.L., M.H., D.L. and T.G. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant number 32202636); the Henan Provincial Key Scientific and Technological Project (grant number 252102110069); the Guizhou Province High-level Innovative Talents (Qiankehe Platform Talents-GCC[2023]028); and the Henan Beef Cattle Industrial Technology System (HARS-22-13-T).

Institutional Review Board Statement

This study was approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of Henan Agricultural University (Approval No. HNND2023102301, approved on 23 October 2023), following the recommendation of the Regulations for the Administration of Affairs Concerning Experimental Animals of China. All methods were carried out in accordance with relevant guidelines and regulations.

Informed Consent Statement

Written informed consent has been obtained from the owner of the animals involved in this study.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available upon request from the corresponding author.

Acknowledgments

The authors hereby extend their sincere gratitude to all staff members of Nanyang Cattle Farm and the breeders, heartfeltly thanking them for their professional support and hard work in the daily careful care of experimental animals and sample collection. We would also like to acknowledge Tianliu Zhang for his invaluable contributions to the investigation, resources, visualization.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Abbreviations

The following abbreviations are used in this manuscript:
WGSWhole-genome sequencing
PCAprincipal component analysis
NJNeighbor-joining
FSTIxation index
θπ ratioNucleotide diversity ratio
IBSIdentity-by-state
ROHRuns of homozygosity
FROHInbreeding coefficient
LDLinkage disequilibrium

References

  1. Chen, N.; Cai, Y.; Chen, Q.; Li, R.; Wang, K.; Huang, Y.; Hu, S.; Huang, S.; Zhang, H.; Zheng, Z.; et al. Whole-genome resequencing reveals world-wide ancestry and adaptive introgression events of domesticated cattle in East Asia. Nat. Commun. 2018, 9, 2337. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Zhang, M.; Peng, W.F.; Hu, X.J.; Zhao, Y.X.; Lv, F.H.; Yang, J. Global genomic diversity and conservation priorities for domestic animals are associated with the economies of their regions of origin. Sci. Rep. 2018, 8, 11677. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Ramljak, J.; Bunevski, G.; Bytyqi, H.; Marković, B.; Brka, M.; Ivanković, A.; Kume, K.; Stojanović, S.; Nikolov, V.; Simčič, M.; et al. Conservation of a domestic metapopulation structured into related and partly admixed strains. Mol. Ecol. 2018, 27, 1633–1650. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Ginja, C.; Gama, L.T.; Cortés, O.; Burriel, I.M.; Vega-Pla, J.L.; Penedo, C.; Sponenberg, P.; Cañón, J.; Sanz, A.; do Egito, A.A.; et al. The genetic ancestry of American Creole cattle inferred from uniparental and autosomal genetic markers. Sci. Rep. 2019, 9, 11486. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Lyu, Y.; Wang, F.; Cheng, H.; Han, J.; Dang, R.; Xia, X.; Wang, H.; Zhong, J.; Lenstra, J.A.; Zhang, H.; et al. Recent selection and introgression facilitated high-altitude adaptation in cattle. Sci. Bull. 2024, 69, 3415–3424. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Mei, C.; Wang, H.; Liao, Q.; Wang, L.; Cheng, G.; Wang, H.; Zhao, C.; Zhao, S.; Song, J.; Guang, X.; et al. Genetic Architecture and Selection of Chinese Cattle Revealed by Whole Genome Resequencing. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2018, 35, 688–699. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Zhang, W.; Gao, X.; Zhang, Y.; Zhao, Y.; Zhang, J.; Jia, Y.; Zhu, B.; Xu, L.; Zhang, L.; Gao, H.; et al. Genome-wide assessment of genetic diversity and population structure insights into admixture and introgression in Chinese indigenous cattle. BMC Genet. 2018, 19, 114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Zhang, L.; Jia, S.; Plath, M.; Huang, Y.; Li, C.; Lei, C.; Zhao, X.; Chen, H. Impact of Parental Bos taurus and Bos indicus Origins on Copy Number Variation in Traditional Chinese Cattle Breeds. Genome Biol. Evol. 2015, 7, 2352–2361. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Kosugi, S.; Momozawa, Y.; Liu, X.; Terao, C.; Kubo, M.; Kamatani, Y. Comprehensive evaluation of structural variation detection algorithms for whole genome sequencing. Genome Biol. 2019, 20, 117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Austin-Tse, C.A.; Jobanputra, V.; Perry, D.L.; Bick, D.; Taft, R.J.; Venner, E.; Gibbs, R.A.; Young, T.; Barnett, S.; Belmont, J.W.; et al. Best practices for the interpretation and reporting of clinical whole genome sequencing. npj Genom. Med. 2022, 7, 27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Yan, C.L.; Lin, J.; Huang, Y.Y.; Gao, Q.S.; Piao, Z.Y.; Yuan, S.L.; Chen, L.; Ren, X.; Ye, R.C.; Dong, M.; et al. Population genomics reveals that natural variation in PRDM16 contributes to cold tolerance in domestic cattle. Zool. Res. 2022, 43, 275–284. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Xia, X.; Wang, F.; Luo, X.; Li, S.; Lyu, Y.; Zheng, Y.; Ma, Z.; Qu, K.; Song, R.; Liu, J.; et al. Structural Variations Associated with Adaptation and Coat Color in Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau Cattle. Adv. Sci. 2025, 12, e03258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Bolger, A.M.; Lohse, M.; Usadel, B. Trimmomatic: A flexible trimmer for Illumina sequence data. Bioinformatics 2014, 30, 2114–2120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Li, H.; Durbin, R. Fast and accurate short read alignment with Burrows-Wheeler transform. Bioinformatics 2009, 25, 1754–1760. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. McKenna, A.; Hanna, M.; Banks, E.; Sivachenko, A.; Cibulskis, K.; Kernytsky, A.; Garimella, K.; Altshuler, D.; Gabriel, S.; Daly, M.; et al. The Genome Analysis Toolkit: A MapReduce framework for analyzing next-generation DNA sequencing data. Genome Res. 2010, 20, 1297–1303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Danecek, P.; Auton, A.; Abecasis, G.; Albers, C.A.; Banks, E.; DePristo, M.A.; Handsaker, R.E.; Lunter, G.; Marth, G.T.; Sherry, S.T.; et al. The variant call format and VCFtools. Bioinformatics 2011, 27, 2156–2158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Purcell, S.; Neale, B.; Todd-Brown, K.; Thomas, L.; Ferreira, M.A.; Bender, D.; Maller, J.; Sklar, P.; de Bakker, P.I.; Daly, M.J.; et al. PLINK: A tool set for whole-genome association and population-based linkage analyses. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 2007, 81, 559–575. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Cingolani, P.; Platts, A.; Wang le, L.; Coon, M.; Nguyen, T.; Wang, L.; Land, S.J.; Lu, X.; Ruden, D.M. A program for annotating and predicting the effects of single nucleotide polymorphisms, SnpEff: SNPs in the genome of Drosophila melanogaster strain w1118; iso-2; iso-3. Fly 2012, 6, 80–92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Ginestet, C. ggplot2: Elegant Graphics for Data Analysis. J. R. Stat. Soc. Ser. A Stat. Soc. 2011, 174, 245–246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Zhang, C.; Dong, S.-S.; Xu, J.-Y.; He, W.-M.; Yang, T.-L. PopLDdecay: A fast and effective tool for linkage disequilibrium decay analysis based on variant call format files. Bioinformatics 2018, 35, 1786–1788. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Alexander, D.H.; Novembre, J.; Lange, K. Fast model-based estimation of ancestry in unrelated individuals. Genome Res. 2009, 19, 1655–1664. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Bu, D.; Luo, H.; Huo, P.; Wang, Z.; Zhang, S.; He, Z.; Wu, Y.; Zhao, L.; Liu, J.; Guo, J.; et al. KOBAS-i: Intelligent prioritization and exploratory visualization of biological functions for gene enrichment analysis. Nucleic Acids Res. 2021, 49, W317–W325. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Akash; Hoque, M.; Mondal, S.; Adusumilli, S. Chapter Four—Sustainable livestock production and food security. In Emerging Issues in Climate Smart Livestock Production; Mondal, S., Singh, R.L., Eds.; Academic Press: San Diego, CA, USA, 2022; pp. 71–90. [Google Scholar]
  24. Purfield, D.C.; Berry, D.P.; McParland, S.; Bradley, D.G. Runs of homozygosity and population history in cattle. BMC Genet. 2012, 13, 70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Keller, M.C.; Visscher, P.M.; Goddard, M.E. Quantification of inbreeding due to distant ancestors and its detection using dense single nucleotide polymorphism data. Genetics 2011, 189, 237–249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Zhang, Y.; Wei, Z.; Zhang, M.; Wang, S.; Gao, T.; Huang, H.; Zhang, T.; Cai, H.; Liu, X.; Fu, T.; et al. Population Structure and Selection Signal Analysis of Nanyang Cattle Based on Whole-Genome Sequencing Data. Genes 2024, 15, 351. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Hunter, P. Genetics against extinction: New conservation strategies consider genetic diversity and habitat loss. EMBO Rep. 2023, 24, e57521. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Nicoletti, F.; Di Menna, L.; Iacovelli, L.; Orlando, R.; Zuena, A.R.; Conn, P.J.; Dogra, S.; Joffe, M.E. GPCR interactions involving metabotropic glutamate receptors and their relevance to the pathophysiology and treatment of CNS disorders. Neuropharmacology 2023, 235, 109569. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Arundine, M.; Tymianski, M. Molecular mechanisms of glutamate-dependent neurodegeneration in ischemia and traumatic brain injury. Cell Mol. Life Sci. 2004, 61, 657–668. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Mangan, R.J.; Alsina, F.C.; Mosti, F.; Sotelo-Fonseca, J.E.; Snellings, D.A.; Au, E.H.; Carvalho, J.; Sathyan, L.; Johnson, G.D.; Reddy, T.E.; et al. Adaptive sequence divergence forged new neurodevelopmental enhancers in humans. Cell 2022, 185, 4587–4603.e4523. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Schumacher, T.; Reyer, H.; Maak, S.; Röntgen, M. Homer 1 genotype AA variant relates to congenital splay leg syndrome in piglets by repressing Pax7 in myogenic progenitors. Front. Vet. Sci. 2023, 10, 1028879. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Blottner, D.; Trautmann, G.; Furlan, S.; Gambara, G.; Block, K.; Gutsmann, M.; Sun, L.W.; Worley, P.F.; Gorza, L.; Scano, M.; et al. Reciprocal Homer1a and Homer2 Isoform Expression Is a Key Mechanism for Muscle Soleus Atrophy in Spaceflown Mice. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 23, 75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Li, H.; Wang, P.; Zhang, C.; Zuo, Y.; Zhou, Y.; Han, R. Defective BVES-mediated feedback control of cAMP in muscular dystrophy. Nat. Commun. 2023, 14, 1785. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Zheng, H.; An, M.; Luo, Y.; Diao, X.; Zhong, W.; Pang, M.; Lin, Y.; Chen, J.; Li, Y.; Kong, Y.; et al. PDGFRα(+)ITGA11(+) fibroblasts foster early-stage cancer lymphovascular invasion and lymphatic metastasis via ITGA11-SELE interplay. Cancer Cell 2024, 42, 682–700.e612. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Song, J.; Li, Y.; Wu, K.; Hu, Y.; Fang, L. MyD88 and Its Inhibitors in Cancer: Prospects and Challenges. Biomolecules 2024, 14, 562. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Michell, R.H.; Allan, D. Inositol cyclis phosphate as a product of phosphatidylinositol breakdown by phospholipase C (Bacillus cereus). FEBS Lett. 1975, 53, 302–304. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Streb, H.; Irvine, R.F.; Berridge, M.J.; Schulz, I. Release of Ca2+ from a nonmitochondrial intracellular store in pancreatic acinar cells by inositol-1,4,5-trisphosphate. Nature 1983, 306, 67–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Ahmed, S.K. How to choose a sampling technique and determine sample size for research: A simplified guide for researchers. Oral Oncol. Rep. 2024, 12, 100662. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Sham, P.C.; Purcell, S.M. Statistical power and significance testing in large-scale genetic studies. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2014, 15, 335–346. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Xu, Y.; Jiang, Y.; Shi, T.; Cai, H.; Lan, X.; Zhao, X.; Plath, M.; Chen, H. Whole-genome sequencing reveals mutational landscape underlying phenotypic differences between two widespread Chinese cattle breeds. PLoS ONE 2017, 12, e0183921. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Genome-wide characterization of SNPs. (A) Bar plot depicting SNP density distribution across consecutive 1-Mb windows on autosomes. Color gradient reflects SNP density (SNPs/Mb), with scale bars indicating physical positions (Mb). (B) Histogram of SNP counts per chromosome. The dashed line denotes the genome-wide average SNP density. (C) Functional annotation pie chart of genomic SNPs.
Figure 1. Genome-wide characterization of SNPs. (A) Bar plot depicting SNP density distribution across consecutive 1-Mb windows on autosomes. Color gradient reflects SNP density (SNPs/Mb), with scale bars indicating physical positions (Mb). (B) Histogram of SNP counts per chromosome. The dashed line denotes the genome-wide average SNP density. (C) Functional annotation pie chart of genomic SNPs.
Animals 15 03033 g001
Figure 2. (A,B) IBS genetic distance matrices for the nanyang_A and nanyang_B. Gradient coloration in the heatmap reflects genetic divergence, with deep green regions indicating closer kinship between individuals. (C) Proportional distribution of ROH segments classified by length. (D) Boxplots of genomic FROH calculated from cumulative ROH lengths. Box boundaries denote interquartile ranges.
Figure 2. (A,B) IBS genetic distance matrices for the nanyang_A and nanyang_B. Gradient coloration in the heatmap reflects genetic divergence, with deep green regions indicating closer kinship between individuals. (C) Proportional distribution of ROH segments classified by length. (D) Boxplots of genomic FROH calculated from cumulative ROH lengths. Box boundaries denote interquartile ranges.
Animals 15 03033 g002
Figure 3. Genetic divergence analysis of Nanyang cattle subpopulations. (A) PCA of the nanyang_A and nanyang_B. Overlapping point clusters indicate absence of significant genetic differentiation, with the first two principal components accounting for 33.8% of cumulative variance. (B) NJ tree constructed from genome-wide SNP data, color-coded labels denote cohort affiliation. (C) LD decay profiles quantified by the decline in correlation coefficient (r2) between adjacent SNPs over physical distance (Mb). The slower LD decay in nanyang_B (red line) compared to nanyang_A (blue line) suggests reduced historical gene flow in the mountainous cohort. (D) ADMIXTURE-based population structure analysis (K = 2). Individual ancestry proportions (vertical bars) are shown along the horizontal axis.
Figure 3. Genetic divergence analysis of Nanyang cattle subpopulations. (A) PCA of the nanyang_A and nanyang_B. Overlapping point clusters indicate absence of significant genetic differentiation, with the first two principal components accounting for 33.8% of cumulative variance. (B) NJ tree constructed from genome-wide SNP data, color-coded labels denote cohort affiliation. (C) LD decay profiles quantified by the decline in correlation coefficient (r2) between adjacent SNPs over physical distance (Mb). The slower LD decay in nanyang_B (red line) compared to nanyang_A (blue line) suggests reduced historical gene flow in the mountainous cohort. (D) ADMIXTURE-based population structure analysis (K = 2). Individual ancestry proportions (vertical bars) are shown along the horizontal axis.
Animals 15 03033 g003
Figure 4. Selective signature analysis and functional enrichment of Nanyang cattle subpopulations. (A) Manhattan plot illustrating genome-wide selective regions between the nanyang_A and nanyang_B. (B) Scatter plot of FST versus θπ ratio. Gray dashed lines indicate the top 1% significance thresholds for each metric (FST = 0.102; θπ ratio = 1.714), with red circles highlighting candidate windows jointly identified by both methods. (C) Venn diagram of genes overlapping within the top 1% windows of FST and θπ ratio analyses. The intersection corresponds to the co-detected candidate genes in (B). (D) Bubble plot of KEGG pathway enrichment analysis for the 170 candidate genes. Circle area scales with gene count, and color gradient reflects enrichment significance.
Figure 4. Selective signature analysis and functional enrichment of Nanyang cattle subpopulations. (A) Manhattan plot illustrating genome-wide selective regions between the nanyang_A and nanyang_B. (B) Scatter plot of FST versus θπ ratio. Gray dashed lines indicate the top 1% significance thresholds for each metric (FST = 0.102; θπ ratio = 1.714), with red circles highlighting candidate windows jointly identified by both methods. (C) Venn diagram of genes overlapping within the top 1% windows of FST and θπ ratio analyses. The intersection corresponds to the co-detected candidate genes in (B). (D) Bubble plot of KEGG pathway enrichment analysis for the 170 candidate genes. Circle area scales with gene count, and color gradient reflects enrichment significance.
Animals 15 03033 g004
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Zhang, Y.; Liu, X.; Liu, J.; Fu, T.; Huang, H.; Han, M.; Liang, D.; Gao, T. Genomic Insights into Genetic Diversity and Adaptation of Nanyang Cattle: Implications for Conservation and Breeding. Animals 2025, 15, 3033. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani15203033

AMA Style

Zhang Y, Liu X, Liu J, Fu T, Huang H, Han M, Liang D, Gao T. Genomic Insights into Genetic Diversity and Adaptation of Nanyang Cattle: Implications for Conservation and Breeding. Animals. 2025; 15(20):3033. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani15203033

Chicago/Turabian Style

Zhang, Yan, Xian Liu, Jiakun Liu, Tong Fu, Hetian Huang, Mingpeng Han, Dong Liang, and Tengyun Gao. 2025. "Genomic Insights into Genetic Diversity and Adaptation of Nanyang Cattle: Implications for Conservation and Breeding" Animals 15, no. 20: 3033. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani15203033

APA Style

Zhang, Y., Liu, X., Liu, J., Fu, T., Huang, H., Han, M., Liang, D., & Gao, T. (2025). Genomic Insights into Genetic Diversity and Adaptation of Nanyang Cattle: Implications for Conservation and Breeding. Animals, 15(20), 3033. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani15203033

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop