Next Article in Journal
Comparative Effects of C3 and C4 Forages on Growth Performance, Digestibility, and Nitrogen Balance in Korean Crossbred Black Goats
Previous Article in Journal
Laser Acupuncture Effects on Chronic Pain, Inflammatory Response, and Biochemical and Oxidative Stress Markers in Osteoarthritic Dogs: A Randomized Controlled Trial
Previous Article in Special Issue
Detection of Trypanosoma cruzi DNA in Blood of the Lizard Microlophus atacamensis: Understanding the T. cruzi Cycle in a Coastal Island of the Atacama Desert
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Systematic Review

Hemoparasites in Wild Birds: A Systematic Review of Their Ecology and Clinical Implications

by
Alberto Alvarado-Piqueras
1,2,*,†,
María Teresa Gómez-Muñoz
2,† and
Bárbara Martín-Maldonado
3
1
Group of Rehabilitation of the Wild Fauna and Its Habitat, Wildlife Hospital of GREFA, 28220 Majadahonda, Spain
2
Department of Animal Health, Faculty of Veterinary Sciences, University Complutense of Madrid, Avenida Puerta de Hierro s/n, 28040 Madrid, Spain
3
Department of Veterinary Medicine, School of Biomedical and Health Sciences, Universidad Europea de Madrid, 28670 Villaviciosa de Odón, Spain
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Animals 2025, 15(17), 2570; https://doi.org/10.3390/ani15172570
Submission received: 25 July 2025 / Revised: 18 August 2025 / Accepted: 29 August 2025 / Published: 1 September 2025

Simple Summary

Blood parasites transmitted by insects can affect wild birds across the globe, but their impact on bird health is not well understood. This study reviewed existing scientific research to better understand these parasites and how they affect birds in nature. Although more research has been performed in recent years, it is mostly limited to certain regions and types of birds. There are still many challenges in identifying these parasites, especially when studying birds in the wild or at rescue centers. However, modern laboratory tools have helped scientists to learn more about the variety of parasites and how they interact with their bird hosts. This review points out the gaps in current knowledge and calls for more research to understand how these parasites affect bird populations, especially as environmental changes and new diseases continue to emerge. A deeper understanding of these parasites will help to protect bird health and biodiversity in a changing world.

Abstract

Hemoparasites are blood-borne parasites transmitted by vectors and are commonly found in wild birds worldwide. The most frequently reported genera include Plasmodium, Haemoproteus, Leucocytozoon, and Trypanosoma, while filarial worms and other hemoparasites are less frequently reported. Despite their importance, knowledge of their effects on the health of wild birds remains limited. This systematic review summarizes all scientific findings on hemoparasites in wild birds, emphasizing their implications for host health. The literature reveals a high number of articles in this area in recent decades, reflecting a growing concern about hemoparasites in wildlife and their ecological impact. However, studies remain unevenly distributed across regions and bird taxa. Diagnostic limitations, particularly in fieldwork and wildlife rehabilitation, continue to present challenges for the accurate detection and monitoring of these parasites. Nevertheless, molecular tools have advanced our understanding of parasite diversity and host–parasite dynamics. Our work highlights key knowledge gaps and stresses the need for further research to improve the understanding of the role of hemoparasites in avian ecology, particularly concerning environmental change and emerging infectious diseases.

1. Introduction

Parasitism can be defined as an interspecific association between two organisms, the parasite and the host. The parasite is metabolically reliant on the host and engages in a mutual exchange of substances [1,2,3]. Hemoparasites are obligatory parasitic organisms that infect the blood cells of vertebrate animals. Vectors transmit them and are currently distributed across all continents [4]. The impact on human and animal health is substantial, with numerous species of hemoparasites recognized for causing diseases ranging from debilitating to fatal. Vector-borne diseases are subject to constant changes due to global warming, species migration, globalization, and vector transportation, among others [5]. Their significance in veterinary medicine is well recognized. However, compared to domestic species, knowledge regarding their biology, transmission, and particularly pathogenesis in wildlife remains limited [6,7].
The most common hemoparasites among wild birds are unicellular protists, such as Haemoproteus spp., Leucocytozoon spp., Plasmodium spp., and Trypanosoma spp. [8,9,10,11]. The genera Haemoproteus, Leucocytozoon, and Plasmodium belong to the order Haemospororida within the phylum Apicomplexa. By contrast, the genus Trypanosoma is classified under the order Trypanosomatida within the phylum Euglenozoa [12].
One of the main challenges in the study of hemoparasites arises from the vast diversity of species, including hosts, hemoparasites, and even vectors. Furthermore, the high dispersal ability of these avian species facilitates contact between diverse hemoparasites and vectors. This increases the likelihood of interactions with naive hosts, making the study more complex, as these host–parasite relationships constantly evolve [13]. Also, the increased vectorial spread observed in some geographic regions over the past few decades may promote the geographic distribution of vector-borne diseases [14,15].
Wild birds are key agents in the non-anthropogenic spread of pathogens due to their high dispersal capacity [13,16,17]. Although certain well-known hemoparasites, such as Plasmodium falciparum and Trypanosoma brucei, have been well studied, many others, particularly those affecting wildlife, remain poorly understood [18]. Furthermore, the persistent threat of climate change as a major driver in the emergence and re-emergence of infectious diseases has underscored the growing need to understand the ecological and evolutionary factors that drive the spread of hemoparasites [19,20].
Notably, most countries lack formal wildlife surveillance systems, and the detection of hemoparasites often relies on wildlife rehabilitation centers, which report cases within the constraints of their diagnostic and operational capacities. This fragmented and limited data collection hinders a comprehensive understanding of hemoparasite–host interactions and highlights the urgent need for more systematic and targeted research in this area.
In this context, this systematic review aimed to summarize the scientific information about hemosporidian hemoparasites (Plasmodium, Haemoproteus, and Leucocytozoon) in wild birds and their consequences for host health and to identify gaps in the field of study. Other blood parasites, such as filarial worms or Trypanosoma spp., were considered only when reported in the same studies addressing hemosporidians but were not the primary focus of the search strategy.

2. Materials and Methods

To achieve this, a systematic review was conducted using the PubMed and Google Scholar platforms, focusing on two items: “Hemoparasites” (item 1) and “Wild birds” (item 2). Different search terms for each item were combined by the Boolean operators “OR” and “AND.” For item 1, the search terms were “Hemoparasite”, “Hemosporidia”, “Apicomplexa”, “Plasmodium”, “Trypanosoma”, “Haemoproteus”, and “Leucocytozoon.” For item 2, only “wild bird” was employed. The search strategy was designed to target hemosporidian hemoparasites in wild birds; therefore, search terms referring exclusively to non-hemosporidian parasites (e.g., microfilariae) were not included. The search was performed in May 2024, and 876 publications were obtained from the first search. Then, following the PRISMA 2020 statement [21], titles and abstracts were reviewed, and only manuscripts that agreed on both items were included. Studies focused only on hemoparasite vectors, without original data from wild birds, were excluded. Only those that included both vector studies and analyses of hemoparasites in wild birds within the same article were included in this analysis. Other exclusion criteria were full text not available online, non-original studies (reviews, book chapters, and similar), other than peer-reviewed studies, published in non-indexed journals, and language other than English, French, or Spanish (Figure 1). Finally, 231 studies were included in the present review.

3. Bibliometric Analysis

The first study about hemoparasites in wild birds was published in 1959. Since then, the number of publications per year was low until the new millennium. Interest in wildlife research has been increasing, along with the overall number of scientific studies, especially in the last decade, with a mean of 16.8 published original studies on hemoparasites per year (Figure 2). The increase in number of publications after the early 2000s coincides with advances in molecular diagnostics, which have facilitated more sensitive and large-scale parasite detection.
Considering only original studies, 188 were descriptive, 35 were experimental, and 8 were case reports (Figure 3A). From the descriptive and case reports publications, 162 were focused on multiple hemoparasite genera (82.7%), while 34 were focused only on one genus (17.3%) (Figure 3B). Overall, 82.4% of the descriptive studies provided data about Plasmodium, 84.6% about Haemoproteus, 63.8% about Leucocytozoon, 19.6% about Trypanosoma, and 12.7% about filariae. Other protozoan hemoparasite genera (7.8%) described in wild birds were Lankesterella, Hepatozoon, Babesia, Atoxoplasma, Crithidia, Blastocrithidia, Herpetomonas, Leptomonas, and Wallaceina, and hemoparasite bacteria such as Borrelia, Ehrlichia, and Aegyptianella. It is important to note that many of the studies, particularly older ones, did not report parasite identifications beyond the genus level or did not provide quantitative data for each host species. This limitation prevents the construction of a comprehensive cross-distribution table linking each bird taxon to specific hemoparasite taxa without introducing bias.
According to study location, most of the studies were carried out in Europe (37.7%) [22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30,31,32,33,34,35,36,37,38,39,40,41,42,43,44,45,46,47,48,49,50,51,52,53,54,55,56,57,58,59,60,61,62,63,64,65,66,67,68,69,70,71,72,73,74,75,76,77,78,79,80,81,82,83,84,85,86,87,88,89,90,91,92,93,94,95,96,97,98,99,100,101,102,103,104,105,106], followed by North America (21.2%) [71,107,108,109,110,111,112,113,114,115,116,117,118,119,120,121,122,123,124,125,126,127,128,129,130,131,132,133,134,135,136,137,138,139,140,141,142,143,144,145,146,147,148,149,150,151,152,153,154,155,156,157,158,159,160,161,162,163], Asia (12.8%) [65,71,143,164,165,166,167,168,169,170,171,172,173,174,175,176,177,178,179,180,181,182,183,184,185,186,187,188,189,190,191], South America (12%) [50,71,153,192,193,194,195,196,197,198,199,200,201,202,203,204,205,206,207,208,209,210,211,212,213,214,215,216,217], Africa (9.7%) [71,218,219,220,221,222,223,224,225,226,227,228,229,230,231,232,233,234,235,236,237], Oceania (4.6%) [71,236,237,238,239,240,241,242,243,244,245,246], Central America (1.7%) [139,247,248], and Antarctica (0.3%) [249]. The United States (18.6%), Spain (9.5%), Brazil (6.9%), Russia (6.5%), the United Kingdom (5.1%), and Japan (4.3%) were the countries with the highest numbers of hemoparasite studies in wild birds in decreasing order (Figure 4). Countries leading in publication output, such as the USA, Spain, and Brazil, often benefit from established ornithological research networks, long-term ecological monitoring programs, and targeted funding for emerging infectious disease research. Conversely, regions with rich avian biodiversity but low research output, such as parts of Africa and Southeast Asia, likely face limitations in research infrastructure, funding allocation, and international collaboration opportunities.
Only 14 of the 231 individual studies included in this systematic review were conducted in more than one country, highlighting the scarcity of multi-country research efforts [26,65,71,83,88,92,101,139,143,153,166,199,232,235]. The predominance of single-country studies also indicates that cross-border collaborations remain underdeveloped, despite the transboundary nature of avian migrations and parasite transmission. Strengthening these collaborations could enhance data comparability, fill geographic gaps, and better integrate parasite ecology into conservation and public health strategies.
More than 1800 avian species have been investigated, representing 176 different families and 33 orders. Among them, the species most assessed was the house sparrow (Passer domesticus) (26/188 descriptive studies included this species, 13.8%). The taxonomic focus on certain avian orders, especially Passeriformes (1138/1802 species, 63.2%), likely reflects both sampling convenience and the existence of well-funded monitoring schemes in temperate regions. The proportion of avian orders in which hemoparasites have been assessed is represented in Figure 5, and more details can be found in Supplementary Table S1.
Among the published original studies, 194 were identified as “captured in the field”, 28 were classified as “admitted to recovery centers”, and 9 included both categories.

4. Clinical Signs Related to Hemoparasites in Wild Birds

Articles investigating the relationship between hemoparasites and the occurrence of clinical signs were compiled. Studies in which the clinical signs were not supported by statistical analysis were excluded from this analysis. Only 39 of the 231 articles collected were included and classified to assess the impact of hemoparasites within each of the following categories: (1) effects on body condition, mass, and growth; (2) relationship with reproductive success and survival; (3) blood parameters and immune response alterations; (4) effects on activity, body temperature, and behavior; (5) effects on feather quality or growth; and (6) interactions with ectoparasites. Since the first three categories contained the most significant number of compiled articles, they were summarized in tables (see Supplementary Table S2).

4.1. Effects on Body Condition, Mass, and Growth

Twenty-six articles performed statistical analyses on body condition index (BCI), mass or growth related to hemoparasites. Among them, most of the articles (14/26) found no statistically significant relationship between hemoparasites and the various variables examined in each study.
Hemoparasites and BCI. The body condition index is a numerical scale used to assess the amount of energy reserves stored and muscle mass development in an individual. This metric is particularly relevant when the specimen size deviates from the species’ expected norm due to underdevelopment, age, or sex, regardless of extrinsic variations such as temperature, latitude [43], or location [144]. Some studies investigating the association between BCI and parasitism intensity (Plasmodium spp.) found no evidence of a significant association [56,72,152,244], nor between BCI and the presence/absence of hemoparasites (mainly Plasmodium spp.) [159].
However, a recent study reported a significant association between low BCI (2/5) and the presence of Leucocytozoon. In barn owls (Tyto alba), individuals with a BCI of 2/5 exhibited parasitism rates five times higher than those with a standard BCI of 3/5 [99]. These results suggest that BCI may influence susceptibility to hemoparasites; however, such findings were inconsistent across studies. For instance, Baillie et al. [240] reported a positive relationship between BCI and the presence of Plasmodium spp. at one location (Tawharanui, New Zealand) but a negative relationship at another (Hauturu, New Zealand).
Additionally, some studies reported a positive relationship between hemoparasitism and BCI in juvenile individuals, but not in adults, suggesting that age may modulate the effects of parasitic infection on BCI. This pattern was observed by Bichet et al. [79] and Jiménez-Peñuela et al. [77], who suggested that age may play a significant role in the dynamics of parasitism, with higher prevalence observed in adults, possibly due to its chronic nature. Similarly, Gupta et al. [181] found a positive relationship between the presence of Haemoproteus spp. and BCI. However, these findings contradicted those of Meixell et al. [147], who reported a negative association between BCI and Haemoproteus spp. and Leucocytozoon spp., but not for Plasmodium spp. infection. Furthermore, they reported a variation in this association with Leucocytozoon spp. among host species: negative in northern pintail (Anas acuta) and positive in American wigeon (Mareca americana). This underscores the importance of monitoring multiple species within the same geographical area to fully understand host–parasite interactions since individual host traits may determine the outcome of the infection [147].
Other studies found no association between hemoparasite presence and BCI [68,214]. These findings suggest that the relationship between BCI and hemoparasitism is likely influenced by a combination of factors, including bird species, age, local environmental conditions, and probably parasite species, highlighting the complexity of these interactions across different ecological contexts. It is important to note that, in many cases, other diseases remained unknown, as co-infections were not specifically investigated. Accounting for all relevant variables is particularly challenging in wild animals, which may contribute to inconsistencies among studies. Also, there was a clear lack of studies examining not only the presence of hemoparasites but also parasitic burden concerning BCI. The few existing ones [226,250] were excluded from this study due to inconsistent data collection methodology.
Hemoparasites and body mass. Body mass measurement eliminates BCI’s subjectivity, providing greater accuracy when combined with other morphometric measurements, such as tarsus length or wing length [251]. Several studies found no statistically significant relationship between the presence or absence of hemoparasites and body mass in experimental studies inoculating hemoparasites such as Plasmodium elongatum [75] or Plasmodium relictum [62], nor in descriptive studies with Haemoproteus spp., Leucocytozoon spp., or Plasmodium spp. [85], or only Plasmodium spp. [159]. Similarly, no significant relationship was observed between parasite intensity and body mass with P. relictum [90]. By contrast, Marzal et al. [45] observed lower body mass in infected individuals (Haemoproteus spp. and Plasmodium spp.) than in uninfected ones. Once again, this discrepancy in results suggests that the relationship between hemoparasitism and body mass may depend on various factors, such as bird or parasite species, type of infection, or environmental conditions, pointing to the need for continued investigation of these interactions to draw more robust conclusions.
Notably, Karell et al. [37] found no association between body mass and Leucocytozoon spp. infection in the grey morph, but reduced body mass was observed in the brown morph of the tawny owl (Strix aluco) associated with this parasite genus. This underscores the importance of considering morphotype and genetic variation in future studies, a factor that remained relatively unexplored in the studies analyzed [37].
Some studies found a statistically significant relationship between lower body mass in animals with hemoparasite co-infections (Haemoproteus spp. and Plasmodium spp.) compared to animals without hemoparasites or with only one type of hemoparasite in the blood [31]. These findings suggest that the impact of co-infection on body mass may be variable, potentially influenced by factors such as the species of hemoparasite involved, host species, or ecological characteristics, highlighting the need for further research to understand these interactions better.
Taken together, these findings indicate that hemoparasitic effects on body condition are not entirely idiosyncratic but may follow certain patterns. Co-infection, high parasite loads, and infections occurring in juvenile or nutritionally stressed individuals appear more likely to correlate with reduced BCI or body mass. Morphological variations within species, such as color morphs in owls, may also modulate these impacts, suggesting a role for genetic factors in determining host resilience. Such patterns, while not universal, can guide targeted studies focusing on susceptible host groups or environmental contexts where impacts are most likely to be detected.

4.2. Effects on Reproductive Success and Survival

In general, parasitic infections are expected to reduce reproductive performance due to the energetic cost of mounting immune responses or the direct damage caused by the parasite to host tissues and physiological functions [252,253]. However, the studies included in this review revealed a more complex and variable picture. Twelve studies conducted statistical analyses on reproductive success, sex, and survival, based on the premise that survival and reproductive success may be intrinsically connected.
Reproductive parameters. The variability in the parameters examined in the literature was considerable, leading to few definitive conclusions. For instance, Marzal et al. [31] observed that, in western house martins (Delichon urbicum), individuals with parasitic co-infections (Haemoproteus spp. and Plasmodium spp.) produced a higher number of eggs per clutch and successfully reared more fledglings compared to individuals without infections or with a single infection. However, in a subsequent study by the same research group on the same species and geographical region (Spain), greater reproductive success was found in uninfected birds, which initiated laying earlier, had larger clutch sizes, and successfully reared more fledglings than infected birds [45]. This highlights the importance of analyzing co-infections, as they can influence disease severity in complex ways, sometimes reducing pathogenicity through competitive interactions, but often exacerbating disease outcomes. Moreover, age-related data were lacking in these two studies. Reproductive success, parasite prevalence, and co-infection probability tend to increase with age. Age may act as a confounding variable and should be considered in interpreting such associations.
Some authors reported a decrease in fledgling rates related to infection with hemoparasites [72,152]. By contrast, in other studies, no statistically significant differences were reported in the number of eggs laid or the number of nestlings hatched between infected and non-infected female birds. Moreover, infected females showed increased reproductive parameters, such as the number of eggs per clutch, fledglings, and hatching rate [135,146]. In males, no significant alterations were found in spermatozoa following Plasmodium spp. inoculation, nor in other reproductive parameters [160].
Survival. Several studies found a negative association between hemoparasitic burden and host survival. For instance, Dadam et al. [73] reported reduced survival in both adult and juvenile house sparrows infected with P. relictum, similarly to Townsend et al. [152], who observed decreased survival in Plasmodium-infected American crows (Corvus brachyrhynchos). However, this effect was not seen with other hemosporidia infections. Hemoparasitism was also linked to increased telomere shortening in common reed warblers (Acrocephalus arundinaceus), suggesting a cumulative effect on cellular aging [52]. Furthermore, co-infections appear to intensify the impact on survival, as shown by Pigeault et al. [72], who found that great tits (Parus major) co-infected with multiple hemoparasites (Plasmodium spp., Haemoproteus spp., and Leucocytozoon spp.) had lower survival rates than those with single infections. By contrast, an experimental study by Ilgūnas et al. [76] found no association between Plasmodium elongatum experimental infection and mortality in common starlings (Sturnus vulgaris) and common crossbills (Loxia curvirostra). These contrasting findings highlight the variability in the effects of hemoparasitism on survival, which may depend on factors such as host species, hemoparasite species, and co-infection [29].
Despite the variability among species and study designs, two recurrent patterns stand out. First, co-infections are more often associated with altered reproductive parameters, possibly due to the combined energetic demands of multiple immune responses. Second, early breeding and higher fledging success tend to occur in uninfected individuals in several passerine species, suggesting that infection may delay or reduce reproductive output in some contexts. Linking reproductive metrics with detailed parasitological data, including infection stage and intensity, will be critical to determine causality and inform conservation measures for vulnerable populations.

4.3. Blood Parameters and Immune Response Alterations

Alterations in hematocrit, packed cell volume (PCV), and hemoglobin. Establishing an increase or decrease in hematocrit levels or PCV may be complex as a pathological event. One of the most likely scenarios associates an increase in these hematological parameters with dehydration [254], while a decrease could be linked to blood loss, like hemorrhage or hemolysis [255].
Although some studies found no relationship between hemoparasitism and hematocrit [90], PCV [79], and hemoglobin [104], other authors observed a statistically significant drop in hematocrit level or PCV following experimental infection by different species of Plasmodium [76,111]. For example, wild turkeys (Meleagris gallopavo) showed a 20% decrease in mean PCV on day 25 post-infection with Plasmodium hermani [111]. This decrease was consistent with the pathophysiology of Plasmodium, in which the parasite develops within and ultimately destroys red blood cells during its life cycle, leading to anemia and consequently reduced hematocrit values [99,152,176]. By contrast, other studies found that Plasmodium spp. infection was associated with increased hematocrit values, whereas infections with Haemoproteus spp. or Leucocytozoon spp. were unrelated to such alterations [176].
The study by Jenkins et al. [56] on great tits (n = 67) highlighted the importance of quantifying hemoparasitism and considering the different locations used in the study. While no general relation was found between hematocrit values and parasitic burden, individuals infected with P. relictum from Dorigny (Switzerland) exhibited lower hematocrit levels compared to those who were free of the hemoparasite.
As in previous analyses, the response to hemoparasitism varied across different species. For instance, in the study by Sijbranda et al. [244], the PCV of North Island robins (Petroica longipes) infected with Plasmodium spp. was significantly lower than that of uninfected individuals. However, no relationship was observed between parasitic burden and other species studied. Furthermore, it is essential to assess the influence of co-infection in hemoparasite studies, as shown in the work by Marzal et al. [31], where they reported higher hematocrit levels in western house martin with dual infections (Haemoproteus spp. and Plasmodium spp.). Notably, co-infections may interact in complex ways, sometimes resulting in competitive suppression between parasites, and other times potentially enhancing overall virulence, highlighting the importance of considering these dynamics in ecological and evolutionary analyses.
Alterations in the leukocyte formula. Alteration of the heterophil/lymphocyte (H/L) ratio is considered an indicator of immune response. However, some authors reported no association between changes in the H/L ratio and infection by Leucocytozoon spp. [37], Haemoproteus killangoi, and Haemoproteus zosteropis or Plasmodium spp. [59]. This last author, by contrast, reported an increase in this ratio in New Caledonian Zosterops (Zosterops spp.) parasitized by microfilariae [59].
On the other hand, other studies reported increases in the numbers of heterophils and lymphocytes in individuals infected with hemosporidia [141]. A higher white blood cell count (WBC) was observed in parasitized barn owls than in non-parasitized individuals [99].
Although the number of heterophils showed a significant decrease in parasitized blackcaps (Sylvia atricapilla), no association was found between this parameter and treatment with primaquine or parasitic burden [68]. By contrast, in the same study, lymphocyte counts did not vary throughout the study but were higher in birds with multiple hemoparasitic infections (Plasmodium spp., Haemoproteus spp., and Leucocytozoon spp.). These findings suggest that specific leukocyte populations, such as lymphocytes, could be influenced by the complexity of the parasitic burden, particularly in cases of co-infection. This highlights the potential value of leukocyte profiling in assessing the immune responses to hemoparasitism, although further research is needed to clarify these dynamics.
Alterations in analytes related to oxidative stress. The digestion of hemoglobin by some hemoparasite species leads to iron release, which can catalyze the formation of reactive oxygen metabolites (ROM), recognized markers of cellular oxidative stress. Conversely, total glutathione (tGSH) functions as an endogenous antioxidant and, together with ROM levels, these biomarkers can be used to assess the oxidant/antioxidant balance and the presence or absence of oxidative stress. Some studies suggest that generating free radicals may be responsible for inducing tissue damage [256]. Based on this premise, some authors found a positive association between ROM levels and parasitemia, but not for tGSH in great tits (n = 299) [44]. Moreover, an interaction between sex and tGSH with hemoparasitemia was observed, with infected males showing higher tGSH levels than uninfected males. By contrast, infected females exhibited lower tGSH levels or no significant difference compared to uninfected females [44].
Corticosterone is a key hormone in the stress response [257]. A study on house sparrows (n = 113) assessed the corticosterone levels in captured birds. Two blood samples were collected: one immediately after capture and another 30 min post-capture. Using nested PCR (nPCR) to determine the infection status with Haemoproteus spp., Plasmodium spp., and Leucocytozoon spp., the authors found no significant correlation between hemoparasitemia and either baseline or stress-induced corticosterone levels [79]. These results suggest that hemosporidia infection does not markedly alter hypothalamic–pituitary–adrenal (HPA) axis function in this bird species.
Also, thiobarbituric acid reactive substances (TBARS) produced during lipid peroxidation and oxidation serve as valuable indicators of oxidative stress response. In this sense, birds infected with Haemoproteus spp. exhibited significantly higher TBARS levels, probably due to increased oxidative damage that can harm avian health [97].
In great tits (n = 92), the relationship between hemoparasitism and oxidative stress was investigated by measuring four key markers of oxidative stress: pro-oxidant production, such as mitochondrial superoxide production in red blood cells (RBCs); antioxidant defenses, such as plasma antioxidant capacity; oxidative damage, measured by reactive oxygen metabolites in plasma; and RBC membrane resistance to oxidative damage. Superoxide production in red blood cells (RBCs) was higher in infected individuals than in uninfected ones. Although no direct relationship was observed between ROM and infection status, a notable association was found between clutch size, ROM levels, and infection status. In uninfected individuals, ROM levels increased as clutch size increased, while in infected individuals, ROM levels rose as clutch size decreased. No relationship was found between RBC membrane resistance to oxidative attack or plasma antioxidant capacity and infection status [60]. These results suggest that increased superoxide production in infected individuals may be attributed to higher energy demands. This could arise from the activation of immune functions [258], which can be energetically costly, or from the diversion of energy by the parasite for its development [60].
Alterations in inflammatory proteins: immunoglobulins and haptoglobin. In birds, haptoglobin is classified as an acute-phase protein, with its concentration increasing during inflammatory processes. An elevation in haptoglobin levels was observed in parasitized birds (n = 424) from 22 species, suggesting that hemoparasitism (Plasmodium spp., Haemoproteus spp., or Leucocytozoon spp.) could be associated with inflammatory responses [141].
Interestingly, in blackcaps (n = 64) treated with primaquine, IgY levels were positively correlated with parasitic burden (Haemoproteus spp., Plasmodium spp., or Leucocytozoon spp.), decreasing significantly when treatment was applied. Furthermore, when controlling infection intensity, a significant negative correlation was observed between initial plasma immunoglobulin and haptoglobin levels [68].
Across studies, Plasmodium spp. infections emerged as more consistently associated with hematological alterations, particularly reductions in hematocrit levels and PCV, compared to Haemoproteus spp. or Leucocytozoon spp. These changes are likely linked to the parasite’s life cycle, which involves invasion and destruction of red blood cells. By contrast, other hemoparasites may cause subtler or more transient hematological effects. The interplay between parasite species, co-infection status, and host physiology underscores the need for standardized hematological assessments in wildlife parasitology to facilitate cross-study comparisons and early detection of clinically relevant impacts.

4.4. Effects on Bird Activity, Body Temperature, and Behavior

This category may be closely associated with the effects of hemoparasitism on oxidative stress, as increased energy expenditure could reflect alterations in host activity, thermoregulation, and behavior. The authors analyzed it separately, given that it primarily has qualitative characteristics. Given the need for a control group for such specific measurements, it is noteworthy that, with one exception, all of the articles analyzed in this category were experimental studies, in which wild birds were captured, and in some cases, Plasmodium spp. was inoculated [62,104,154], or the specimens were already infected with Plasmodium spp. or Leucocytozoon spp. [56]. Reaction time was measured in both a control group and an experimentally infected group, finding that parasitemia itself did not alter the birds’ reaction [62]. On the other hand, parasitized birds exhibited significantly reduced activity as early as the first few days after experimental infection, which could lead to long-term effects on bird behavior. Even when parasitemia decreased considerably, the birds did not fully recover and continued to exhibit reduced activity. However, a trend toward increased activity was established in chronic infections [62,160].
The aerobic performance of migratory birds has been investigated by analyzing the resting metabolic rate (RMR), which represents the energy expenditure to maintain basic functions like breathing, circulation, and organ function under resting conditions. The RMR of uninfected birds remained indistinguishable from that of birds with low parasitemia. However, birds with high parasitemia (infected with P. relictum) exhibited a significantly lower RMR during the migratory period than uninfected birds. By contrast, the endurance times of free-living infected birds did not show significant differences compared to their parasite-free conspecifics [104]. Thus, although high parasitemia alters the RMR of migratory birds, the impact on aerobic performance and endurance capacity appears to be less pronounced during migration. Consequently, despite parasitemia, birds in migratory dispositions could maintain demanding exercise levels for considerably long periods. These results highlight the complexity of the relationship between infection and behavior in birds, suggesting that infection status, whether acute or chronic, can have varying impacts on activity levels. Regarding body temperature, infection was related to temperature in approximately half of the predictive models analyzed by Jenkins et al.: in one of the populations examined, infected birds exhibited lower body temperatures than uninfected birds [56]. Although infection influenced body temperature in some models, at the end of the experiment, infection status was not a strong predictor of body temperature, suggesting further investigation of other factors that may influence temperature variation in infected birds.

4.5. Effects on Feather Quality or Growth

Few studies analyzed the effect of hemoparasites on bird plumage, both in terms of feather quality and growth. In Western house martins (n = 444), the length of rectrix feathers was shorter in Haemoproteus spp.- or Plasmodium spp.-infected birds compared to uninfected ones. Additionally, infected birds showed more growth bands on their feathers than uninfected individuals, and the latter exhibited a higher growth rate of rectrix feathers than infected birds [45]. Two hypotheses have been proposed to explain this association. The first one, supported by studies by Sherman et al. [259] and Martin and Kirk [260], suggests that some parasites, such as Plasmodium, obtain essential amino acids from the host plasma and digest host hemoglobin. Thus, the shortening of feathers could result from the essential nutrients directly consumed by hemoparasites. The second one considers that differences in daily feather elongation could be related to activation of the immune response. Since both avian molt and the immune response are nutrient-demanding processes, the feather growth rate in infected house martins was reduced, as resources must be reallocated to develop this immune response. However, in studies conducted on P. relictum, Plasmodium ashfordi [41], and Haemoproteus majoris [85] in captured birds, no relationship was found between hemoparasitism and feather growth or quality, highlighting the need for further studies under different conditions to truly understand the consequences of hemoparasitosis on bird plumage.

4.6. Interactions with Ectoparasites

Only two articles investigated the association between ectoparasites and the presence or quantity of hemoparasites [31,45]. Both studies were conducted in the same exact location, with the same host (Western house martin) and similar conditions. Despite the similarity in approaches, the results obtained were remarkably diverse. In the first study [31], the authors found that specimens harboring Haemoproteus spp. and Plasmodium spp. had significantly higher numbers of ectoparasites (chewing lice and feather mites). On the contrary, in the second article [45], there were no significant differences in the abundance of chewing lice between Haemoproteus spp.- and Plasmodium spp.-infected and uninfected birds. Unlike the first study, hemoparasite sequencing was not performed in the last study, and the detection of dual infections by hemoparasites was impossible. This fact highlights the importance of accurate hemoparasite detection in better understanding the interactions between ectoparasites and hemoparasites. One of the hypotheses put forward by Marzal et al. [31], in finding a relationship between co-infection by hemoparasites and the number of ectoparasites, is that because grooming in birds is an activity that requires considerable time and energy [261], the higher levels of ectoparasites observed in co-infected birds could be interpreted as a consequence of the weakness induced by infection with these hemoparasites.

5. Lesions and Mortality

Eighteen studies included in this review analyzed mortality directly associated with the presence of hemoparasites. In captured free-living birds where individuals were assumed to return to the same nest box, survival rates were inferred based on the absence of recapture on the following performances [31,32,39]. Other investigations were conducted on deceased individuals, primarily during mortality outbreaks in penguins [120,206,222,241,243]. The number of specimens analyzed in each study was generally small, limiting the potential for statistical associations. In these cases, the matrix analyzed often consisted of tissue samples with abundant histological descriptions, mainly of the liver, spleen, and lungs. These five articles examined the presence of Plasmodium spp., among other hemoparasites, and four reported hepatic alterations. These findings were observed through histopathological analysis or postmortem examination, such as hepatomegaly [120,241] or pinpoint flat white to off-white spots disseminated over the hepatic capsule [241]. The latter revealed a high number of protozoan schizonts and macrophages within hepatic vessels and parenchyma [120,206,241], as well as lipid accumulation in hepatocytes [243]. Additionally, these five studies reported alterations in the spleen, such as splenomegaly [120,222], multifocal necrotic areas within the splenic parenchyma [241], and increased phagocytic activity [120,206,241,243]. Furthermore, some studies also noted pulmonary lesions, including pulmonary edema [120,222], interstitial hypercellularity [243], and pulmonary congestion [206].
As stated above, the number of studies directly linking hemoparasitic infection to mortality rate was limited, primarily due to small sample sizes and the inherent challenges of field-based data collection. Nevertheless, the consistent pathological findings across these investigations highlight a clear association between Plasmodium spp. infection and damage to vital organs. The recurring hepatic, splenic, and pulmonary alterations observed underscore the potential severity of hemoparasitic infections, particularly during mortality outbreaks [120,206,222,241,243]. These findings reinforce the importance of incorporating histopathological analysis into postmortem studies to deepen our understanding of the pathological mechanisms and broader health impacts of hemoparasites in avian species.

6. Diagnostic Methods

It is often challenging to obtain enough subjects or representative samples to conduct a meaningful study with wild birds, which impedes progress in advancing knowledge in this field. Furthermore, diagnostic techniques are often limited to optical microscopy due to the limited resources available in rehabilitation centers. Optical microscopy may lack high sensitivity, and its specificity can vary depending on the observer’s experience [262]. The development of new diagnostic techniques to detect hemoparasites in recent decades has enabled, among other things, a better understanding of these parasitic infections [262], which is crucial for establishing greater control over them, particularly in tropical and subtropical regions where favorable ecological conditions require sustained surveillance and control measures. Despite these challenges, the growing field of hemoparasitology has begun to address some of these gaps in knowledge. Advances in molecular techniques, such as next-generation sequencing, have allowed for a more detailed understanding of hemoparasite genomes, enabling researchers to explore new aspects of parasite biology and host-parasite interactions. However, much work remains to completely clarify the immune response to hemoparasitic infections, their transmission dynamics, and the broader ecological factors that influence their prevalence and health impact.
To analyze the detection of different hemoparasites, the type of sample collected for analysis in each article was compiled. It was reasonable to assume that blood would be the most significant sample collected, as venipuncture is a safe and accessible method in avian species of nearly all sizes when performed by a trained veterinarian. It causes minimal harm to the animal [263], although some samples were taken directly from heart puncture [107]. Out of the 231 articles analyzed, 194 collected only blood, 13 collected only organs, and 22 collected both blood and organs. Feathers were collected in two of the articles; in one, blood was also collected [41], and in the other, organs were collected [93]. The organ samples included the intestine, muscle, spleen, liver, lungs, and brain, among others. Although using blood as a matrix for hemoparasite analysis demonstrates the ease of sample collection and the opportunity to detect hemoparasites circulating in peripheral blood, hemoparasitic infections may go undetected. Moreover, prevalence may be underestimated in host individuals with chronic infections not undergoing a relapse phase characterized by elevated blood parasitemia [226,264]. Ideally, hemoparasite detection should include the analysis of additional matrices beyond blood, such as internal organs [200].
The techniques employed with these samples were compiled and divided into the following categories: optical microscopy, nested PCR (nPCR), conventional PCR (PCR), real-time PCR (qPCR), histology or histopathology, enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), chromogenic in situ hybridization (CISH), electron microscopy, and others. The numbers of studies that employed each recorded technique are detailed in Figure 6. Although some studies addressed the variability in hemoparasite detection results across different diagnostic techniques [265,266,267], optical microscopy was the most employed method. The low cost and short processing time of microscopy and the development of various microscopic quantification approaches have contributed to its continued use. Moreover, microscopy has shown comparable effectiveness to molecular techniques such as nPCR in detecting hemoparasites [267].
A temporal evolution analysis of the different techniques was designed to better understand the various techniques used for analyzing hemoparasitosis, as shown in Figure 7. Scientific advances in the development of molecular techniques are reflected in their increasing use over time, progressively displacing other diagnostic methods.
In this way, to determine the type of technique used for analyzing each hemoparasitosis, data on each of the hemoparasites analyzed with the four most common methods in hemoparasite analysis were gathered: optical microscopy, nPCR, qPCR, and PCR. Figure 8 shows that filarial worm and Trypanosoma diagnoses were based mainly on microscopic detection. It should be noted that molecular diagnostic techniques were not employed in the compiled articles until 2002. The nested PCR protocol developed by Hellgren et al. [268] was also widely used, as it allows simultaneous detection of the genera Leucocytozoon, Plasmodium, and Haemoproteus. It is worth noting that the first study to use qPCR to diagnose hemoparasites was published in 2008. Since then, 21 studies have employed this technique, establishing qPCR alongside nested PCR as an increasingly adopted method, gradually replacing conventional PCR for hemoparasite analysis.
Finally, articles in which the parasitic load of hemoparasites was quantified, either by optical microscopy or qPCR, were compiled. Of the 231 articles analyzed, 113 quantified the hemoparasitic load. Notably, there was inequity between the articles that conducted quantification and those that did not. When examining each hemoparasite individually, almost no variation in quantification could be observed between hemoparasites. According to these data, and given that most quantification relied on optical microscopy, this lack of variation could be explained by the fact that quantifying an additional hemoparasite beyond those targeted initially in the study does not represent a significant increase in economic cost for the researcher.
A major limitation identified during this review was the inconsistent reporting of parasite taxonomy and infection metrics across studies, especially in the earlier literature. In many cases, results were presented only at the genus level or aggregated across host species, precluding the generation of a complete matrix of bird species by hemoparasite taxa. Addressing this gap will require standardization of reporting practices to allow future reviews to identify and quantify these associations more precisely.

7. Conclusions

This systematic review was focused on hemoparasites and their health impacts on wild birds. Studies remained unevenly distributed across regions, bird groups, and parasite types. Most were descriptive, with few experimental analyses, highlighting the need for such approaches. The health effects of hemoparasites were inconsistent, varying with host species, age, infection intensity, and environment. However, some studies, as is common in wild species research, lacked data about some of these variables, limiting the conclusions of many of them. Nevertheless, authors described a greater pathogenic potential in Plasmodium spp. infections compared to Leucocytozoon spp. or Haemoproteus spp., suggesting species-specific differences in virulence. While some studies linked infections to reduced body condition, immune changes, oxidative stress, or reproduction, many showed no clear impact, reflecting complex host–parasite dynamics. Notably, infection probability appears to increase with host age, likely due to the chronic nature of many hemoparasites, and co-morbidities may influence outcomes, though they were rarely assessed. Moreover, the hemoparasite forms typically detected in blood were gamonts, which appear after the parasite has completed earlier developmental stages in internal organs, where any potential pathogenic effects are more likely to take place, biasing the possible pathogenic effects of hemoparasites. While variability is inherent in wildlife health studies, synthesizing the available evidence revealed certain patterns with practical relevance. For instance, the more pathogenic potential of Plasmodium spp. compared to Leucocytozoon spp. or Haemoproteus spp. was supported across different geographic contexts, particularly when infection intensity was high or when co-infections occurred. These patterns highlight the importance of integrating hemoparasite monitoring into conservation and disease surveillance programs, especially in regions undergoing rapid environmental change where shifts in vector distributions may alter host–parasite dynamics. Finally, diagnostic challenges were detected, especially reliance on microscopy in low-resource settings and limited detection. To advance understanding, there is a need for better diagnostic techniques, standardized methods, and expanded research in understudied areas and taxa. Future work should focus on longitudinal and interdisciplinary studies to clarify hemoparasitic effects on wild bird populations.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/ani15172570/s1, Supplementary Table S1: Number of published articles assessing the presence of haemosporidian parasites in different bird species, classified by order and family. Supplementary Table S2: Overview of reported effects of avian hemoparasitism across previous studies, including impacts on the three most studied categories. References [31,37,44,45,52,56,59,60,62,68,72,73,75,76,77,79,85,89,90,97,99,105,111,135,136,141,146,152,159,160,161,176,181,214,240,244,247] are cited in the Supplementary Materials. References numbers cited in the Supplementary Table S2 correspond to the the Main Text Reference Section.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, B.M.-M. and M.T.G.-M.; methodology, B.M.-M. and A.A.-P.; formal analysis, B.M.-M. and A.A.-P.; investigation, B.M.-M. and A.A.-P.; data curation, B.M.-M. and A.A.-P.; writing—original draft preparation, A.A.-P. and B.M.-M.; writing—review and editing, M.T.G.-M., A.A.-P. and B.M.-M.; supervision, M.T.G.-M. and B.M.-M.; project administration, M.T.G.-M. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the “Ministerio para la Transición Ecológica y el Reto Demográfico (MITECO)” of Spain, but the study does not express the opinion of the Ministry.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data supporting this systematic review are available upon request from the corresponding author.

Acknowledgments

The authors want to thank all GREFA volunteers and staff for their invaluable support. We also want to thank Marina Müeller and Inés Téllez for their help creating the figures.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Cheng, T.C.; Hernández Saint-Aubin, L.M.; Madrigal Sesma, M.J. Parasitología General, 2nd ed.; Traducción de: General Parasitology; Editorial Limusa: Mexico City, Mexico, 1978. [Google Scholar]
  2. Clayton, D.; Moore, J. Host-Parasite Evolution: General Principles and Avian Models; Oxford University Press (OUP): Oxford, UK, 1997. [Google Scholar]
  3. Poulin, R. Evolutionary Ecology of Parasites: From Individuals to Communities; Chapman and Hall: New York, NY, USA, 1998. [Google Scholar]
  4. Omeragic, J.; Seric-Haracic, S.; Kapo, N. Zoonotic Parasites and Vector-Borne Parasitoses. In Zoonosis of Public Health Interest; IntechOpen: London, UK, 2022; Available online: https://ideas.repec.org//h/ito/pchaps/263127.html (accessed on 16 October 2024).
  5. de La Rocque, S.; Balenghien, T.; Halos, L.; Dietze, K.; Claes, F.; Ferrari, G.; Guberti, V.; Slingenbergh, J. A review of trends in the distribution of vector-borne diseases: Is international trade contributing to their spread? Rev. Sci. Et Tech. (Int. Off. Epizoot.) 2011, 30, 119–130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Ryser-Degiorgis, M.-P. Wildlife health investigations: Needs, challenges and recommendations. BMC Vet. Res. 2013, 9, 223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Tompkins, D.M.; Dunn, A.M.; Smith, M.J.; Telfer, S. Wildlife diseases: From individuals to ecosystems. J. Anim. Ecol. 2011, 80, 19–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Swangneat, K.; Srikacha, N.; Soulinthone, N.; Paudel, S.; Srisanyong, W.; Stott, C.J.; Mahawan, T.; Pornpanom, P. Molecular Prevalence of Avian Haemosporidian Parasites in Southeast Asia: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Animals 2025, 15, 636. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Yan, W.-L.; Sun, H.-T.; Zhao, Y.-C.; Hou, X.-W.; Zhang, M.; Zhao, Q.; Elsheikha, H.M.; Ni, H.-B. Global prevalence of Plasmodium infection in wild birds: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Res. Vet. Sci. 2024, 168, 105136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Villalva-Pasillas, D.; Medina, J.P.; Soriano-Vargas, E.; Martínez-Hernández, D.A.; García-Conejo, M.; Galindo-Sánchez, K.P.; Sánchez-Jasso, J.M.; Talavera-Rojas, M.; Salgado-Miranda, C. Haemoparasites in endemic and non-endemic passerine birds from central Mexico highlands. Int. J. Parasitol. Parasites Wildl. 2020, 11, 88–92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Greiner, E.C.; Bennett, G.F.; White, E.M.; Coombs, R.F. Distribution of the avian hematozoa of North America. Can. J. Zool. 1975, 53, 1762–1787. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Adl, S.M.; Leander, B.S.; Simpson, A.G.B.; Archibald, J.M.; Anderson, O.R.; Bass, D.; Bowser, S.S.; Brugerolle, G.; Farmer, M.A.; Karpov, S.; et al. Diversity, nomenclature, and taxonomy of protists. Syst. Biol. 2007, 56, 684–689. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Jourdain, E.; Gauthier-Clerc, M.; Bicout, D.J.; Sabatier, P. Bird migration routes and risk for pathogen dispersion into western Mediterranean wetlands. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 2007, 13, 365–372. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Semenza, J.C.; Suk, J.E. Vector-borne diseases and climate change: A European perspective. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 2018, 365, fnx244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Caminade, C.; McIntyre, K.M.; Jones, A.E. Impact of recent and future climate change on vector-borne diseases. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 2019, 1436, 157–173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Qiu, Y.; Lv, C.; Chen, J.; Sun, Y.; Tang, T.; Zhang, Y.; Yang, Y.; Wang, G.; Xu, Q.; Zhang, X.; et al. The global distribution and diversity of wild-bird-associated pathogens: An integrated data analysis and modeling study. Med 2025, 6, 100553. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Jindal, M.; Stone, H.; Lim, S.; MacIntyre, C.R. A Geospatial Perspective Toward the Role of Wild Bird Migrations and Global Poultry Trade in the Spread of Highly Pathogenic Avian Influenza H5N1. GeoHealth 2025, 9, e2024GH001296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Kasozi, K.I.; Zirintunda, G.; Ssempijja, F.; Buyinza, B.; Alzahrani, K.J.; Matama, K.; Nakimbugwe, H.N.; Alkazmi, L.; Onanyang, D.; Bogere, P.; et al. Epidemiology of Trypanosomiasis in Wildlife—Implications for Humans at the Wildlife Interface in Africa. Front. Vet. Sci. 2021, 8, 621699. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Leal Filho, W.; Nagy, G.J.; Gbaguidi, G.J.; Paz, S.; Dinis, M.A.P.; Luetz, J.M.; Sharifi, A. The role of climatic changes in the emergence and re-emergence of infectious diseases: Bibliometric analysis and literature-supported studies on zoonoses. One Health Outlook 2025, 7, 12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Pérez-Rodríguez, A.; de la Hera, I.; Fernández-González, S.; Pérez-Tris, J. Global warming will reshuffle the areas of high prevalence and richness of three genera of avian blood parasites. Glob. Change Biol. 2014, 20, 2406–2416. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Page, M.J.; McKenzie, J.E.; Bossuyt, P.M.; Boutron, I.; Hoffmann, T.C.; Mulrow, C.D.; Shamseer, L.; Tetzlaff, J.M.; Akl, E.A.; Brennan, S.E.; et al. The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ 2021, 372, n71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Muñoz, E.; Ferrer, D.; Molina, R.; Adlard, R.D. Prevalence of haematozoa in birds of prey in Catalonia, north-east Spain. Vet. Rec. 1999, 144, 632–636. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Merino, S.; Moreno, J.; José Sanz, J.; Arriero, E. Are avian blood parasites pathogenic in the wild? A medication experiment in blue tits (Parus caeruleus). Proc. R. Soc. London. Ser. B Biol. Sci. 2000, 267, 2507–2510. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Valkiūnas, G.; Liutkevicius, G.; Iezhova, T.A. Complete development of three species of Haemoproteus (Haemosporida, Haemoproteidae) in the biting midge Culicoides impunctatus (Diptera, Ceratopogonidae). J. Parasitol. 2002, 88, 864–868. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Votýpka, J.; Oborník, M.; Volf, P.; Svobodová, M.; Lukes, J. Trypanosoma avium of raptors (Falconiformes): Phylogeny and identification of vectors. Parasitology 2002, 125 Pt 3, 253–263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Pérez-Tris, J.; Bensch, S. Diagnosing genetically diverse avian malarial infections using mixed-sequence analysis and TA-cloning. Parasitology 2005, 131, 15–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Westerdahl, H.; Waldenström, J.; Hansson, B.; Hasselquist, D.; von Schantz, T.; Bensch, S. Associations between malaria and MHC genes in a migratory songbird. Proc. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 2005, 272, 1511–1518. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Cosgrove, C.L.; Knowles, S.C.L.; Day, K.P.; Sheldon, B.C. No evidence for avian malaria infection during the nestling phase in a passerine bird. J. Parasitol. 2006, 92, 1302–1304. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Martínez de la Puente, J.; Merino, S.; Tomás, G.; Moreno Klemming, J.; Morales, J.; Lobato, E.; García-Fraile, S. Can the host immune system promote multiple invasions of erythrocytes in vivo? Differential effects of medication and host sex in a wild malaria-like model. Parasitology 2007, 134, 651–655. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Ortego, J.; Cordero, P.J.; Aparicio, J.M.; Calabuig, G. No relationship between individual genetic diversity and prevalence of avian malaria in a migratory kestrel. Mol. Ecol. 2007, 16, 4858–4866. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Marzal, A.; Bensch, S.; Reviriego, M.; Balbontin, J.; De Lope, F. Effects of malaria double infection in birds: One plus one is not two. J. Evol. Biol. 2008, 21, 979–987. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Stjernman, M.; Råberg, L.; Nilsson, J.-Å. Maximum Host Survival at Intermediate Parasite Infection Intensities. PLoS ONE 2008, 3, e2463. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Knowles, S.C.L.; Palinauskas, V.; Sheldon, B.C. Chronic malaria infections increase family inequalities and reduce parental fitness: Experimental evidence from a wild bird population. J. Evol. Biol. 2010, 23, 557–569. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Knowles, S.C.L.; Wood, M.J.; Sheldon, B.C. Context-dependent effects of parental effort on malaria infection in a wild bird population, and their role in reproductive trade-offs. Oecologia 2010, 164, 87–97. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. La Puente, J.M.; Merino, S.; Tomás, G.; Moreno, J.; Morales, J.; Lobato, E.; García-Fraile, S.; Belda, E.J. The blood parasite Haemoproteus reduces survival in a wild bird: A medication experiment. Biol. Lett. 2010, 6, 663–665. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Wojczulanis-Jakubas, K.; Svoboda, A.; Kruszewicz, A.; Johnsen, A. No Evidence of Blood Parasites in Little Auks (Alle alle) Breeding on Svalbard. J. Wildl. Dis. 2010, 46, 574–578. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Karell, P.; Ahola, K.; Karstinen, T.; Kolunen, H.; Siitari, H.; Brommer, J.E. Blood parasites mediate morph-specific maintenance costs in a colour polymorphic wild bird. J. Evol. Biol. 2011, 24, 1783–1792. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Knowles, S.C.L.; Wood, M.J.; Alves, R.; Wilkin, T.A.; Bensch, S.; Sheldon, B.C. Molecular epidemiology of malaria prevalence and parasitaemia in a wild bird population. Mol. Ecol. 2011, 20, 1062–1076. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Lachish, S.; Knowles, S.C.L.; Alves, R.; Wood, M.J.; Sheldon, B.C. Fitness effects of endemic malaria infections in a wild bird population: The importance of ecological structure. J. Anim. Ecol. 2011, 80, 1196–1206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Martínez-de la Puente, J.; Martínez, J.; Rivero-de Aguilar, J.; Herrero, J.; Merino, S. On the specificity of avian blood parasites: Revealing specific and generalist relationships between haemosporidians and biting midges. Mol. Ecol. 2011, 20, 3275–3287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Yohannes, E.; Palinauskas, V.; Valkiūnas, G.; Lee, R.W.; Bolshakov, C.V.; Bensch, S. Does avian malaria infection affect feather stable isotope signatures? Oecologia 2011, 167, 937–942. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Glaizot, O.; Fumagalli, L.; Iritano, K.; Lalubin, F.; Rooyen, J.V.; Christe, P. High Prevalence and Lineage Diversity of Avian Malaria in Wild Populations of Great Tits (Parus major) and Mosquitoes (Culex pipiens). PLoS ONE 2012, 7, e34964. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Garroway, C.J.; Radersma, R.; Sepil, I.; Santure, A.W.; De Cauwer, I.; Slate, J.; Sheldon, B.C. Fine-scale genetic structure in a wild bird population: The role of limited dipersal and environmentally based selection as casual factors. Evolution 2013, 67, 3488–3500. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Isaksson, C.; Sepil, I.; Baramidze, V.; Sheldon, B.C. Explaining variance of avian malaria infection in the wild: The importance of host density, habitat, individual life-history and oxidative stress. BMC Ecol. 2013, 13, 15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Marzal, A.; Reviriego, M.; Hermosell, I.G.; Balbontín, J.; Bensch, S.; Relinque, C.; Rodríguez, L.; Garcia-Longoria, L.; de Lope, F. Malaria infection and feather growth rate predict reproductive success in house martins. Oecologia 2013, 171, 853–861. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Mendes, L.; Pardal, S.; Morais, J.; Antunes, S.; Ramos, J.A.; Perez-Tris, J.; Piersma, T. Hidden haemosporidian infections in Ruffs (Philomachus pugnax) staging in Northwest Europe en route from Africa to Arctic Europe. Parasitol. Res. 2013, 112, 2037–2043. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Palinauskas, V.; Iezhova, T.A.; Križanauskienė, A.; Markovets, M.Y.; Bensch, S.; Valkiūnas, G. Molecular characterization and distribution of Haemoproteus minutus (Haemosporida, Haemoproteidae): A pathogenic avian parasite. Parasitol. Int. 2013, 62, 358–363. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Pérez-Rodríguez, A.; de la Puente, J.; Onrubia, A.; Pérez-Tris, J. Molecular characterization of haemosporidian parasites from kites of the genus Milvus (Aves: Accipitridae). Int. J. Parasitol. 2013, 43, 381–387. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Sepil, I.; Lachish, S.; Hinks, A.E.; Sheldon, B.C. Mhc supertypes confer both qualitative and quantitative resistance to avian malaria infections in a wild bird population. Proc. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 2013, 280, 20130134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. González, A.D.; Matta, N.E.; Ellis, V.A.; Miller, E.T.; Ricklefs, R.E.; Gutiérrez, H.R. Mixed Species Flock, Nest Height, and Elevation Partially Explain Avian Haemoparasite Prevalence in Colombia. PLoS ONE 2014, 9, e100695. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Knowles, S.C.L.; Wood, M.J.; Alves, R.; Sheldon, B.C. Dispersal in a patchy landscape reveals contrasting determinants of infection in a wild avian malaria system. J. Anim. Ecol. 2014, 83, 429–439. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Asghar, M.; Hasselquist, D.; Hansson, B.; Zehtindjiev, P.; Westerdahl, H.; Bensch, S. Hidden costs of infection: Chronic malaria accelerates telomere degradation and senescence in wild birds. Science 2015, 347, 436–438. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Bukauskaitė, D.; Žiegytė, R.; Palinauskas, V.; Iezhova, T.A.; Dimitrov, D.; Ilgūnas, M.; Bernotienė, R.; Markovets, M.Y.; Valkiūnas, G. Biting midges (Culicoides, Diptera) transmit Haemoproteus parasites of owls: Evidence from sporogony and molecular phylogeny. Parasites Vectors 2015, 8, 303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Chakarov, N.; Linke, B.; Boerner, M.; Goesmann, A.; Krüger, O.; Hoffman, J.I. Apparent vector-mediated parent-to-offspring transmission in an avian malaria-like parasite. Mol. Ecol. 2015, 24, 1355–1363. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Dinhopl, N.; Nedorost, N.; Mostegl, M.M.; Weissenbacher-Lang, C.; Weissenböck, H. In situ hybridization and sequence analysis reveal an association of Plasmodium spp. with mortalities in wild passerine birds in Austria. Parasitol. Res. 2015, 114, 1455–1462. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Jenkins, T.; Delhaye, J.; Christe, P. Testing Local Adaptation in a Natural Great Tit-Malaria System: An Experimental Approach. PLoS ONE 2015, 10, e0141391. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Valkiūnas, G.; Iezhova, T.A.; Palinauskas, V.; Ilgūnas, M.; Bernotienė, R. The evidence for rapid gametocyte viability changes in the course of parasitemia in Haemoproteus parasites. Parasitol. Res. 2015, 114, 2903–2909. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Bernotienė, R.; Palinauskas, V.; Iezhova, T.; Murauskaitė, D.; Valkiūnas, G. Avian haemosporidian parasites (Haemosporida): A comparative analysis of different polymerase chain reaction assays in detection of mixed infections. Exp. Parasitol. 2016, 163, 31–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Clark, N.J.; Wells, K.; Dimitrov, D.; Clegg, S.M. Co-infections and environmental conditions drive the distributions of blood parasites in wild birds. J. Anim. Ecol. 2016, 85, 1461–1470. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Delhaye, J.; Jenkins, T.; Christe, P. Plasmodium infection and oxidative status in breeding great tits, Parus major. Malar. J. 2016, 15, 531. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Ilgūnas, M.; Bukauskaitė, D.; Palinauskas, V.; Iezhova, T.A.; Dinhopl, N.; Nedorost, N.; Weissenbacher-Lang, C.; Weissenböck, H.; Valkiūnas, G. Mortality and pathology in birds due to Plasmodium (Giovannolaia) homocircumflexum infection, with emphasis on the exoerythrocytic development of avian malaria parasites. Malar. J. 2016, 15, 256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Mukhin, A.; Palinauskas, V.; Platonova, E.; Kobylkov, D.; Vakoliuk, I.; Valkiūnas, G. The Strategy to Survive Primary Malaria Infection: An Experimental Study on Behavioural Changes in Parasitized Birds. PLoS ONE 2016, 11, e0159216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Valkiūnas, G.; Ilgūnas, M.; Bukauskaitė, D.; Iezhova, T.A. Description of Haemoproteus ciconiae sp. Nov. (Haemoproteidae, Haemosporida) from the white stork Ciconia ciconia, with remarks on insensitivity of established polymerase chain reaction assays to detect this infection. Parasitol. Res. 2016, 115, 2609–2616. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Žiegytė, R.; Bernotienė, R.; Palinauskas, V.; Valkiūnas, G. Haemoproteus tartakovskyi (Haemoproteidae): Complete sporogony in Culicoides nubeculosus (Ceratopogonidae), with implications for avian haemoproteid experimental research. Exp. Parasitol. 2016, 160, 17–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Ishtiaq, F.; Rao, M.; Huang, X.; Bensch, S. Estimating prevalence of avian haemosporidians in natural populations: A comparative study on screening protocols. Parasites Vectors 2017, 10, 127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Padilla, D.P.; Illera, J.C.; Gonzalez-Quevedo, C.; Villalba, M.; Richardson, D.S. Factors affecting the distribution of haemosporidian parasites within an oceanic island. Int. J. Parasitol. 2017, 47, 225–235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Videvall, E.; Cornwallis, C.K.; Ahrén, D.; Palinauskas, V.; Valkiūnas, G.; Hellgren, O. The transcriptome of the avian malaria parasite Plasmodium ashfordi displays host-specific gene expression. Mol. Ecol. 2017, 26, 2939–2958. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Arriero, E.; Pérez-Tris, J.; Ramírez, A.; Remacha, C. Trade-off between tolerance and resistance to infections: An experimental approach with malaria parasites in a passerine bird. Oecologia 2018, 188, 1001–1010. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Chagas, C.R.F.; Bukauskaitė, D.; Ilgūnas, M.; Iezhova, T.; Valkiūnas, G. A new blood parasite of leaf warblers: Molecular characterization, phylogenetic relationships, description and identification of vectors. Parasites Vectors 2018, 11, 538. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Ferraguti, M.; Martínez-de la Puente, J.; Bensch, S.; Roiz, D.; Ruiz, S.; Viana, D.S.; Soriguer, R.C.; Figuerola, J. Ecological determinants of avian malaria infections: An integrative analysis at landscape, mosquito and vertebrate community levels. J. Anim. Ecol. 2018, 87, 727–740. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  71. Masello, J.F.; Martínez, J.; Calderón, L.; Wink, M.; Quillfeldt, P.; Sanz, V.; Theuerkauf, J.; Ortiz-Catedral, L.; Berkunsky, I.; Brunton, D.; et al. Can the intake of antiparasitic secondary metabolites explain the low prevalence of hemoparasites among wild Psittaciformes? Parasites Vectors 2018, 11, 357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Pigeault, R.; Cozzarolo, C.-S.; Choquet, R.; Strehler, M.; Jenkins, T.; Delhaye, J.; Bovet, L.; Wassef, J.; Glaizot, O.; Christe, P. Haemosporidian infection and co-infection affect host survival and reproduction in wild populations of great tits. Int. J. Parasitol. 2018, 48, 1079–1087. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  73. Dadam, D.; Robinson, R.A.; Clements, A.; Peach, W.J.; Bennett, M.; Rowcliffe, J.M.; Cunningham, A.A. Avian malaria-mediated population decline of a widespread iconic bird species. R. Soc. Open Sci. 2019, 6, 182197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Ferraguti, M.; Martínez-de la Puente, J.; García-Longoria, L.; Soriguer, R.; Figuerola, J.; Marzal, A. From Africa to Europe: Evidence of transmission of a tropical Plasmodium lineage in Spanish populations of house sparrows. Parasites Vectors 2019, 12, 548. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  75. Ilgūnas, M.; Bukauskaitė, D.; Palinauskas, V.; Iezhova, T.; Fragner, K.; Platonova, E.; Weissenböck, H.; Valkiūnas, G. Patterns of Plasmodium homocircumflexum virulence in experimentally infected passerine birds. Malar. J. 2019, 18, 174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Ilgūnas, M.; Palinauskas, V.; Platonova, E.; Iezhova, T.; Valkiūnas, G. The experimental study on susceptibility of common European songbirds to Plasmodium elongatum (lineage pGRW6), a widespread avian malaria parasite. Malar. J. 2019, 18, 290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Jiménez-Peñuela, J.; Ferraguti, M.; Martínez-de la Puente, J.; Soriguer, R.; Figuerola, J. Urbanization and blood parasite infections affect the body condition of wild birds. Sci. Total Environ. 2019, 651, 3015–3022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Schumm, Y.R.; Wecker, C.; Marek, C.; Wassmuth, M.; Bentele, A.; Willems, H.; Reiner, G.; Quillfeldt, P. Blood parasites in Passeriformes in central Germany: Prevalence and lineage diversity of Haemosporida (Haemoproteus, Plasmodium and Leucocytozoon) in six common songbirds. PeerJ 2019, 6, e6259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  79. Bichet, C.; Brischoux, F.; Ribout, C.; Parenteau, C.; Meillère, A.; Angelier, F. Physiological and morphological correlates of blood parasite infection in urban and non-urban house sparrow populations. PLoS ONE 2020, 15, e0237170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Chagas, C.R.F.; Binkienė, R.; Ilgūnas, M.; Iezhova, T.; Valkiūnas, G. The buffy coat method: A tool for detection of blood parasites without staining procedures. Parasites Vectors 2020, 13, 104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Díez-Fernández, A.; Martínez-de la Puente, J.; Gangoso, L.; López, P.; Soriguer, R.; Martín, J.; Figuerola, J. Mosquitoes are attracted by the odour of Plasmodium-infected birds. Int. J. Parasitol. 2020, 50, 569–575. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Duc, M.; Ilgūnas, M.; Valkiūnas, G. Patterns of Haemoproteus majoris (Haemosporida, Haemoproteidae) megalomeront development. Acta Trop. 2020, 212, 105706. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  83. Emmenegger, T.; Alves, J.A.; Rocha, A.D.; Costa, J.S.; Schmid, R.; Schulze, M.; Hahn, S. Population- and age-specific patterns of haemosporidian assemblages and infection levels in European bee-eaters (Merops apiaster). Int. J. Parasitol. 2020, 50, 1125–1131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  84. Himmel, T.; Harl, J.; Pfanner, S.; Nedorost, N.; Nowotny, N.; Weissenböck, H. Haemosporidioses in wild Eurasian blackbirds (Turdus merula) and song thrushes (T. philomelos): An in situ hybridization study with emphasis on exo-erythrocytic parasite burden. Malar. J. 2020, 19, 69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Huang, X.; Jönsson, J.; Bensch, S. Persistence of avian haemosporidians in the wild: A case study to illustrate seasonal infection patterns in relation to host life stages. Int. J. Parasitol. 2020, 50, 611–619. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  86. Himmel, T.; Harl, J.; Matt, J.; Weissenböck, H. A citizen science-based survey of avian mortality focusing on haemosporidian infections in wild passerine birds. Malar. J. 2021, 20, 417. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  87. Platonova, E.; Aželytė, J.; Iezhova, T.; Ilgūnas, M.; Mukhin, A.; Palinauskas, V. Experimental study of newly described avian malaria parasite Plasmodium (Novyella) collidatum n. sp., genetic lineage pFANTAIL01 obtained from South Asian migrant bird. Malar. J. 2021, 20, 82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  88. Schumm, Y.R.; Bakaloudis, D.; Barboutis, C.; Cecere, J.G.; Eraud, C.; Fischer, D.; Hering, J.; Hillerich, K.; Lormée, H.; Mader, V.; et al. Prevalence and genetic diversity of avian haemosporidian parasites in wild bird species of the order Columbiformes. Parasitol. Res. 2021, 120, 1405–1420. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Wiegmann, A.; Springer, A.; Rinaud, T.; Ottensmann, M.; Legler, M.; Krüger, O.; Fehr, M.; Chakarov, N.; Strube, C. The prevalence of Leucocytozoon spp. In nestlings of three wild raptor species including implications on haematological and blood chemistry values. Int. J. Parasitol. Parasites Wildl. 2021, 16, 236–243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Aželytė, J.; Platonova, E.; Bensch, S.; Hellgren, O.; Palinauskas, V. A comparative analysis of the dynamics of Plasmodium relictum (GRW4) development in the blood during single and co-infections. Acta Trop. 2022, 226, 106247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Ellis, V.A.; Kalbskopf, V.; Ciloglu, A.; Duc, M.; Huang, X.; Inci, A.; Bensch, S.; Hellgren, O.; Palinauskas, V. Genomic sequence capture of Plasmodium relictum in experimentally infected birds. Parasites Vectors 2022, 15, 267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  92. Ilgūnas, M.; Himmel, T.; Harl, J.; Dagys, M.; Valkiūnas, G.; Weissenböck, H. Exo-Erythrocytic Development of Avian Haemosporidian Parasites in European Owls. Anim. Open Access J. MDPI 2022, 12, 2212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Chagas, C.R.F.; Duc, M.; Himmel, T.; Eigirdas, V.; Weissenböck, H.; Valkiūnas, G. Exo-erythrocytic development of Leucocytozoon parasites (Haemosporida, Leucocytozoidae) in song thrushes Turdus philomelos. Int. J. Parasitol. Parasites Wildl. 2023, 22, 60–68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. de Francisco, O.N.; Sacristán, I.; Ewbank, A.C.; Velarde, R.; Afonso, I.; Garcia-Ferré, D.; Martín-Maldonado, B.; Esperón, F.; Iglesias, I.; de la Torre, A.; et al. First detection of herpesvirus and hemosporidians in the endangered Pyrenean Capercaillie (Tetrao urogallus aquitanicus). Sci. Rep. 2023, 13, 21936. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Gomes, J.; Leitão, M.; Louro, M.C.; Brandão, R.; Mateus, T.L. Avian Malaria in wild birds from a wildlife rehabilitation center in Central Portugal. Vet. Parasitol. Reg. Stud. Rep. 2023, 43, 100904. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. González-Olvera, M.; Hernandez-Colina, A.; Chantrey, J.; Allen, S.; Lopez, J.; Baylis, M. A non-invasive feather-based methodology for the detection of blood parasites (Haemosporida). Sci. Rep. 2023, 13, 16712. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Jiménez-Peñuela, J.; Ferraguti, M.; Martínez-De La Puente, J.; Soriguer, R.C.; Figuerola, J. Oxidative status in relation to blood parasite infections in house sparrows living along an urbanization gradient. Environ. Pollut. 2023, 316, 120712. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  98. Lynton-Jenkins, J.G.; Chaine, A.S.; Russell, A.F.; Bonneaud, C. Parasite detection and quantification in avian blood is dependent on storage medium and duration. Ecol. Evol. 2023, 13, e9819. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Martín-Maldonado, B.; Mencía-Gutiérrez, A.; Andreu-Vázquez, C.; Fernández, R.; Pastor-Tiburón, N.; Alvarado, A.; Carrero, A.; Fernández-Novo, A.; Esperón, F.; González, F. A Four-Year Survey of Hemoparasites from Nocturnal Raptors (Strigiformes) Confirms a Relation between Leucocytozoon and Low Hematocrit and Body Condition Scores of Parasitized Birds. Vet. Sci. 2023, 10, 54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Himmel, T.; Harl, J.; Matt, J.; Nedorost, N.; Lunardi, M.; Ilgūnas, M.; Iezhova, T.; Valkiūnas, G.; Weissenböck, H. Co-infecting Haemoproteus species (Haemosporida, Apicomplexa) show different host tissue tropism during exo-erythrocytic development in Fringilla coelebs (Fringillidae). Int. J. Parasitol. 2024, 54, 1–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  101. Sheppard, E.C.; Martin, C.A.; Armstrong, C.; González-Quevedo, C.; Illera, J.C.; Suh, A.; Spurgin, L.G.; Richardson, D.S. Genotype–environment associations reveal genes potentially linked to avian malaria infection in populations of an endemic island bird. Mol. Ecol. 2024, 33, e17329. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Zehtindjiev, P.; Ilieva, M.; Westerdahl, H.; Hansson, B.; Valkiūnas, G.; Bensch, S. Dynamics of parasitemia of malaria parasites in a naturally and experimentally infected migratory songbird, the great reed warbler Acrocephalus arundinaceus. Exp. Parasitol. 2008, 119, 99–110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  103. Shurulinkov, P.; Spasov, L.; Stoyanov, G.; Chakarov, N. Blood parasite infections in a wild population of ravens (Corvus corax) in Bulgaria. Malar. J. 2018, 17, 33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. Hahn, S.; Bauer, S.; Dimitrov, D.; Emmenegger, T.; Ivanova, K.; Zehtindjiev, P.; Buttemer, W.A. Low intensity blood parasite infections do not reduce the aerobic performance of migratory birds. Proc. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 2018, 285, 20172307. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  105. Iezhova, T.A.; Valkiūnas, G.; Bairlein, F. Vertebrate Host Specificity of Two Avian Malaria Parasites of the Subgenus Novyella Plasmodium nucleophilum and Plasmodium vaughani. J. Parasitol. 2005, 91, 472–474. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. Jovani, R.; Sol, D. How predictable is the abundance of double gametocyte infections? Parasitol. Res. 2005, 97, 84–86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  107. Saunders, D.C. Microfilariae and Other Blood Parasites in Mexican Wild Doves and Pigeons. J. Parasitol. 1959, 45, 69–75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Forrester, D.J.; Hon, L.T.; Williams, L.E.; Austin, D.H. Blood protozoa of wild turkeys in Florida. J. Protozool. 1974, 21, 494–497. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Noblet, R.; Moore, H.S. Prevalence and distribution of Leucocytozoon smithi and Haemoproteus meleagridis in wild turkeys in South Carolina. J. Wildl. Dis. 1975, 11, 516–518. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Clark, G.W. Hematozoa of mallard ducks (Anas platyrhynchos) of the Pacific Flyway, Washington. J. Wildl. Dis. 1980, 16, 529–531. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Forrester, D.J.; Humphrey, P.P.; Telford, S.R.; Williams, L.E. Effects of blood-induced infections of Plasmodium hermani on domestic and wild turkey poults. J. Wildl. Dis. 1980, 16, 237–244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  112. Greiner, E.C.; Forrester, D.J. Haemoproteus meleagridis Levine 1961: Redescription and developmental morphology of the gametocytes in turkeys. J. Parasitol. 1980, 66, 652–658. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  113. Bennett, G.F.; Turner, B.; Holton, G. Blood parasites of trumpeter swans, Olor buccinator (Richardson), from Alberta. J. Wildl. Dis. 1981, 17, 213–215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  114. Bennett, G.F.; Nieman, D.J.; Turner, B.; Kuyt, E.; Whiteway, M.; Greiner, E.C. Blood parasites of prairie anatids and their implication in waterfowl management in Alberta and Saskatchewan. J. Wildl. Dis. 1982, 18, 287–296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  115. Christensen, B.M.; Barnes, H.J.; Rowley, W.A. Vertebrate host specificity and experimental vectors of Plasmodium (Novyella) kempi sp. N. From the eastern wild turkey in Iowa. J. Wildl. Dis. 1983, 19, 204–213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  116. Castle, M.D.; Christensen, B.M. Blood and gastrointestinal parasites of eastern wild turkeys from Kentucky and Tennessee. J. Wildl. Dis. 1984, 20, 190–196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  117. Barnard, W.H.; Bair, R.D. Prevalence of avian hematozoa in central Vermont. J. Wildl. Dis. 1986, 22, 365–374. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  118. Allan, R.A.; Mahrt, J.L. Populations of Leucocytozoon gametocytes in blue grouse (Dendragapus obscurus) from Hardwicke Island, British Columbia. J. Protozool. 1987, 34, 363–366. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  119. Atkinson, C.T.; Forrester, D.J. Myopathy associated with megaloschizonts of Haemoproteus meleagridis in a wild turkey from Florida. J. Wildl. Dis. 1987, 23, 495–498. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  120. Fix, A.S.; Waterhouse, C.; Greiner, E.C.; Stoskopf, M.K. Plasmodium relictum as a cause of avian malaria in wild-caught magellanic penguins (Spheniscus magellanicus). J. Wildl. Dis. 1988, 24, 610–619. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  121. Hopkins, B.A.; Skeeles, J.K.; Houghten, G.E.; Slagle, D.; Gardner, K. A survey of infectious diseases in wild turkeys (Meleagridis gallopavo silvestris) from Arkansas. J. Wildl. Dis. 1990, 26, 468–472. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  122. Fedynich, A.M.; Rhodes, O.E., Jr. Hemosporid (Apicomplexa, Hematozoea, Hemosporida) Community Structure and Pattern in Wintering Wild Turkeys. J. Wildl. Dis. 1995, 31, 404–409. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  123. Michot, T.C.; Garvin, M.C.; Weidner, E.H. Survey for blood parasites in redheads (Aythya americana) wintering at the Chandeleur Islands, Louisiana. J. Wildl. Dis. 1995, 31, 90–92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  124. Durden, L.A.; McLean, R.G.; Oliver, J.H.; Ubico, S.R.; James, A.M. Ticks, Lyme disease spirochetes, trypanosomes, and antibody to encephalitis viruses in wild birds from coastal Georgia and South Carolina. J. Parasitol. 1997, 83, 1178–1182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  125. Morishita, T.Y.; Aye, P.P.; Ley, E.C.; Harr, B.S. Survey of pathogens and blood parasites in free-living passerines. Avian Dis. 1999, 43, 549–552. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  126. DeJong, R.J.; Muzzall, P.M. Hematozoa of Waterfowl from Michigan. J. Wildl. Dis. 2000, 36, 767–773. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  127. Ricklefs, R.E.; Fallon, S.M. Diversification and host switching in avian malaria parasites. Proc. Biol. Sci. 2002, 269, 885–892. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  128. Garvin, M.C.; Basbaum, J.P.; Ducore, R.M.; Bell, K.E. Patterns of Haemoproteus beckeri parasitism in the gray catbird (Dumatella carolinensis) during the breeding season. J. Wildl. Dis. 2003, 39, 582–587. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  129. Garvin, M.C.; Greiner, E.C. Epizootiology of Haemoproteus danilewskyi (Haemosporina: Haemoproteidae) in blue jays (Cyanocitta cristata) in southcentral Florida. J. Wildl. Dis. 2003, 39, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  130. Dusek, R.J.; Spalding, M.G.; Forrester, D.J.; Greiner, E.C. Haemoproteus balearicae and other blood parasites of free-ranging Florida sandhill crane chicks. J. Wildl. Dis. 2004, 40, 682–687. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  131. Szymanski, M.M.; Lovette, I.J. High lineage diversity and host sharing of malarial parasites in a local avian assemblage. J. Parasitol. 2005, 91, 768–774. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  132. Heard, D.J.; Mulcahy, D.M.; Iverson, S.A.; Rizzolo, D.J.; Greiner, E.C.; Hall, J.; Ip, H.; Esler, D. A Blood Survey of Elements, Viral Antibodies, and Hemoparasites in Wintering Harlequin Ducks (Histrionicus histrionicus) and Barrow’s Goldeneyes (Bucephala islandica). J. Wildl. Dis. 2008, 44, 486–493. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  133. Leppert, L.L.; Dufty, A.M., Jr.; Stock, S.; Oleyar, M.D.; Kaltenecker, G.S. Survey of Blood Parasites in Two Forest Owls, Northern Saw-whet Owls and Flammulated Owls, of Western North America. J. Wildl. Dis. 2008, 44, 475–479. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  134. Shutler, D.; Lowe, A.G.; Robinson, S.R. Relationships between circulating leucocytes and Leucocytozoon simondi in mallard, Anas platyrhynchos, ducklings. Comp. Biochem. Physiol. Part A Mol. Integr. Physiol. 2010, 156, 46–49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  135. Grillo, E.L.; Fithian, R.C.; Cross, H.; Wallace, C.; Viverette, C.; Reilly, R.; Mayer, D.C.G. Presence of Plasmodium and Haemoproteus in Breeding Prothonotary Warblers (Protonotaria citrea: Parulidae): Temporal and Spatial Trends in Infection Prevalence. J. Parasitol. 2012, 98, 93–102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  136. Astudillo, V.G.; Hernández, S.M.; Kistler, W.M.; Boone, S.L.; Lipp, E.K.; Shrestha, S.; Yabsley, M.J. Spatial, temporal, molecular, and intraspecific differences of haemoparasite infection and relevant selected physiological parameters of wild birds in Georgia, USA. Int. J. Parasitol. Parasites Wildl. 2013, 2, 178–189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  137. Carlson, J.S.; Martínez-Gómez, J.E.; Valkiūnas, G.; Loiseau, C.; Bell, D.A.; Sehgal, R.N.M. Diversity and Phylogenetic Relationships of Hemosporidian Parasites in Birds of Socorro Island, México, and Their Role in the Re-Introduction of the Socorro Dove (Zenaida graysoni). J. Parasitol. 2013, 99, 270–276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  138. Davis, A.K.; Hood, W.R.; Hill, G.E. Prevalence of Blood Parasites in Eastern Versus Western House Finches: Are Eastern Birds Resistant to Infection? EcoHealth 2013, 10, 290–297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  139. Kistler, W.M.; Hernandez, S.M.; Gibbs, S.E.J.; Ballard, J.R.; Arnold, S.L.; Johnson, T.; Yabsley, M.J. Evaluation of a Restriction Fragment Length Enzyme Assay for Differentiation of Haemoproteus and Plasmodium Across a Standard Region of the Mitochondrial Genome. J. Parasitol. 2013, 99, 1133–1136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  140. Charles-Smith, L.E.; Rutledge, M.E.; Meek, C.J.; Baine, K.; Massey, E.; Ellsaesser, L.N.; DePerno, C.S.; Moorman, C.E.; Degernes, L.A. Hematologic Parameters and Hemoparasites of Nonmigratory Canada Geese (Branta canadensis) From Greensboro, North Carolina, USA. J. Avian Med. Surg. 2014, 28, 16–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  141. Ellis, V.A.; Kunkel, M.R.; Ricklefs, R.E. The ecology of host immune responses to chronic avian haemosporidian infection. Oecologia 2014, 176, 729–737. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  142. Ferguson, L.M.; Norton, T.M.; Cray, C.; Oliva, M.; Jodice, P.G.R. Health assessments of brown pelican (Pelecanus occidentalis) nestlings from colonies in South Carolina and Georgia, U.S.A. J. Zoo Wildl. Med. 2014, 45, 802–812. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  143. Ramey, A.M.; Schmutz, J.A.; Reed, J.A.; Fujita, G.; Scotton, B.D.; Casler, B.; Fleskes, J.P.; Konishi, K.; Uchida, K.; Yabsley, M.J. Evidence for intercontinental parasite exchange through molecular detection and characterization of haematozoa in northern pintails (Anas acuta) sampled throughout the North Pacific Basin. Int. J. Parasitol. Parasites Wildl. 2014, 4, 11–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  144. Thurber, M.I.; Gamble, K.C.; Krebs, B.; Goldberg, T.L. Molecular detection of Plasmodium in free-ranging birds and captive flamingos (Phoenicopterus Chilensis) in Chicago. J. Zoo Wildl. Med. 2014, 45, 749–754. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  145. Smith, M.M.; Schmutz, J.; Apelgren, C.; Ramey, A.M. A real-time, quantitative PCR protocol for assessing the relative parasitemia of Leucocytozoon in waterfowl. J. Microbiol. Methods 2015, 111, 72–77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  146. Zylberberg, M.; Derryberry, E.P.; Breuner, C.W.; Macdougall-Shackleton, E.A.; Cornelius, J.M.; Hahn, T.P. Haemoproteus infected birds have increased lifetime reproductive success. Parasitology 2015, 142, 1033–1043. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  147. Meixell, B.W.; Arnold, T.W.; Lindberg, M.S.; Smith, M.M.; Runstadler, J.A.; Ramey, A.M. Detection, prevalence, and transmission of avian hematozoa in waterfowl at the Arctic/sub-Arctic interface: Co-infections, viral interactions, and sources of variation. Parasites Vectors 2016, 9, 390. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  148. Reinoso-Pérez, M.T.; Canales-Delgadillo, J.C.; Chapa-Vargas, L.; Riego-Ruiz, L. Haemosporidian parasite prevalence, parasitemia, and diversity in three resident bird species at a shrubland dominated landscape of the Mexican highland plateau. Parasites Vectors 2016, 9, 307. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  149. Bertram, M.R.; Hamer, S.A.; Hartup, B.K.; Snowden, K.F.; Medeiros, M.C.; Outlaw, D.C.; Hamer, G.L. A novel Haemosporida clade at the rank of genus in North American cranes (Aves: Gruiformes). Mol. Phylogenetics Evol. 2017, 109, 73–79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  150. Bertram, M.R.; Hamer, G.L.; Hartup, B.K.; Snowden, K.F.; Medeiros, M.C.; Hamer, S.A. Haemosporida prevalence and diversity are similar in endangered wild whooping cranes (Grus americana) and sympatric sandhill cranes (Grus canadensis). Parasitology 2017, 144, 629–640. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  151. Slowinski, S.P.; Fudickar, A.M.; Hughes, A.M.; Mettler, R.D.; Gorbatenko, O.V.; Spellman, G.M.; Ketterson, E.D.; Atwell, J.W. Sedentary songbirds maintain higher prevalence of haemosporidian parasite infections than migratory conspecifics during seasonal sympatry. PLoS ONE 2018, 13, e0201563. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  152. Townsend, A.K.; Wheeler, S.S.; Freund, D.; Sehgal, R.N.M.; Boyce, W.M. Links between blood parasites, blood chemistry, and the survival of nestling American crows. Ecol. Evol. 2018, 8, 8779–8790. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  153. Barrow, L.N.; Allen, J.M.; Huang, X.; Bensch, S.; Witt, C.C. Genomic sequence capture of haemosporidian parasites: Methods and prospects for enhanced study of host–parasite evolution. Mol. Ecol. Resour. 2019, 19, 400–410. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  154. Pacheco, M.A.; Parish, C.N.; Hauck, T.J.; Aguilar, R.F.; Escalante, A.A. The endangered California Condor (Gymnogyps californianus) population is exposed to local haemosporidian parasites. Sci. Rep. 2020, 10, 17947. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  155. Reinoso-Pérez, M.T.; Dhondt, K.V.; Sydenstricker, A.V.; Heylen, D.; Dhondt, A.A. Complex interactions between bacteria and haemosporidia in coinfected hosts: An experiment. Ecol. Evol. 2020, 10, 5801–5814. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  156. Adams, D.R.; Golnar, A.J.; Hamer, S.A.; Slotman, M.A.; Hamer, G.L. Culex quinquefasciatus (Diptera: Culicidae) survivorship following the ingestion of bird blood infected with Haemoproteus sp. parasites. Parasitol. Res. 2021, 120, 2343–2350. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  157. Theodosopoulos, A.N.; Grabenstein, K.C.; Bensch, S.; Taylor, S.A. A highly invasive malaria parasite has expanded its range to non-migratory birds in North America. Biol. Lett. 2021, 17, 20210271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  158. Martínez-Hernández, F.; Oria-Martínez, B.; Rendón-Franco, E.; Villalobos, G.; Muñoz-García, C.I. Trypanosoma cruzi, beyond the dogma of non-infection in birds. Infect. Genet. Evol. J. Mol. Epidemiol. Evol. Genet. Infect. Dis. 2022, 99, 105239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  159. Pacheco, M.A.; Ferreira, F.C.; Logan, C.J.; McCune, K.B.; MacPherson, M.P.; Miranda, S.A.; Santiago-Alarcon, D.; Escalante, A.A. Great-tailed Grackles (Quiscalus mexicanus) as a tolerant host of avian malaria parasites. PLoS ONE 2022, 17, e0268161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  160. Talbott, K.M.; Ketterson, E.D. Physiological impacts of chronic and experimental Plasmodium infection on breeding-condition male songbirds. Sci. Rep. 2023, 13, 13091. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  161. Kelly, T.R.; Cannon, A.L.; Stansberry, K.R.; Kimball, M.G.; Lattin, C.R. Changes in hypothalamic–pituitary–adrenal axis function, immunity, and glucose during acute Plasmodium relictum infection in house sparrows (Passer domesticus). Gen. Comp. Endocrinol. 2024, 345, 114388. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  162. Atkinson, C.T.; Saili, K.S.; Utzurrum, R.B.; Jarvi, S.I. Experimental Evidence for Evolved Tolerance to Avian Malaria in a Wild Population of Low Elevation Hawai‘i ‘Amakihi (Hemignathus virens). EcoHealth 2013, 10, 366–375. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  163. Seidl, C.M.; Ferreira, F.C.; Parise, K.L.; Paxton, K.L.; Paxton, E.H.; Atkinson, C.T.; Fleischer, R.C.; Foster, J.T.; Marm Kilpatrick, A. Linking avian malaria parasitemia estimates from quantitative PCR and microscopy reveals new infection patterns in Hawai’i. Int. J. Parasitol. 2024, 54, 123–130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  164. Murata, K. Prevalence of blood parasites in Japanese wild birds. J. Vet. Med. Sci. 2002, 64, 785–790. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  165. Hagihara, M.; Yamaguchi, T.; Kitahara, M.; Hirai, K.; Murata, K. Leucocytozoon lovati Infections in Wild Rock Ptarmigan (Lagopus mutus) in Japan. J. Wildl. Dis. 2004, 40, 804–807. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  166. Ishtiaq, F.; Gering, E.; Rappole, J.H.; Rahmani, A.R.; Jhala, Y.V.; Dove, C.J.; Milensky, C.; Olson, S.L.; Peirce, M.A.; Fleischer, R.C. Prevalence and diversity of avian hematozoan parasites in Asia: A regional survey. J. Wildl. Dis. 2007, 43, 382–398. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  167. Sato, Y.; Hagihara, M.; Yamaguchi, T.; Yukawa, M.; Murata, K. Phylogenetic Comparison of Leucocytozoon spp. from Wild Birds of Japan. J. Vet. Med. Sci. 2007, 69, 55–59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  168. Murata, K.; Nii, R.; Yui, S.; Sasaki, E.; Ishikawa, S.; Sato, Y.; Matsui, S.; Horie, S.; Akatani, K.; Takagi, M.; et al. Avian Haemosporidian Parasites Infection in Wild Birds Inhabiting Minami-Daito Island of the Northwest Pacific, Japan. J. Vet. Med. Sci. 2008, 70, 501–503. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  169. Imura, T.; Suzuki, Y.; Ejiri, H.; Sato, Y.; Ishida, K.; Sumiyama, D.; Murata, K.; Yukawa, M. Prevalence of avian haematozoa in wild birds in a high-altitude forest in Japan. Vet. Parasitol. 2012, 183, 244–248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  170. Salakij, J.; Lertwatcharasarakul, P.; Kasorndorkbua, C.; Salakij, C. Plasmodium circumflexum in a Shikra (Accipiter badius): Phylogeny and ultra-structure of the haematozoa. Jpn. J. Vet. Res. 2012, 60, 105–109. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  171. Tanigawa, M.; Sato, Y.; Ejiri, H.; Imura, T.; Chiba, R.; Yamamoto, H.; Kawaguchi, M.; Tsuda, Y.; Murata, K.; Yukawa, M. Molecular identification of avian haemosporidia in wild birds and mosquitoes on Tsushima Island, Japan. J. Vet. Med. Sci. 2013, 75, 319–326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  172. Elahi, R.; Islam, A.; Hossain, M.S.; Mohiuddin, K.; Mikolon, A.; Paul, S.K.; Hosseini, P.R.; Daszak, P.; Alam, M.S. Prevalence and Diversity of Avian Haematozoan Parasites in Wetlands of Bangladesh. J. Parasitol. Res. 2014, 2014, 493754. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  173. Zhang, Y.; Wu, Y.; Zhang, Q.; Su, D.; Zou, F. Prevalence Patterns of Avian Plasmodium and Haemoproteus Parasites and the Influence of Host Relative Abundance in Southern China. PLoS ONE 2014, 9, e99501. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  174. Borkataki, S.; Katoch, R.; Goswami, P.; Godara, R.; Khajuria, J.K.; Yadav, A.; Kour, R.; Mir, I. Incidence of Haemoproteus columbae in pigeons of Jammu district. J. Parasit. Dis. 2015, 39, 426–428. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  175. Nourani, L.; Aliabadian, M.; Dinparast-Djadid, N.; Mirshamsi, O. New Host Records for Haemoproteus spp. (Apicomplexa: Haemosporidiasina) in Passeriformes from North-West of Iran. J. Arthropod-Borne Dis. 2017, 11, 236–241. [Google Scholar]
  176. Ishtiaq, F.; Barve, S. Do avian blood parasites influence hypoxia physiology in a high elevation environment? BMC Ecol. 2018, 18, 15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  177. Nourani, L.; Aliabadian, M.; Mirshamsi, O.; Djadid, N.D. Correction: Molecular detection and genetic diversity of avian haemosporidian parasites in Iran. PLoS ONE 2018, 14, e0212453. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  178. Rhim, H.; Bae, J.; Kim, H.; Han, J.-I. Prevalence and phylogenetic analysis of avian haemosporidia in wild birds in the republic of Korea. J. Wildl. Dis. 2018, 54, 772–781. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  179. Gupta, P.; Vishnudas, C.K.; Ramakrishnan, U.; Robin, V.V.; Dharmarajan, G. Geographical and host species barriers differentially affect generalist and specialist parasite community structure in a tropical sky-island archipelago. Proc. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 2019, 286, 20190439. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  180. Yuda, P. Detection of avian malaria in wild birds at Trisik Beach of Yogyakarta, Java (Indonesia). Ann. Parasitol. 2019, 65, 171–175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  181. Gupta, P.; Vishnudas, C.K.; Robin, V.V.; Dharmarajan, G. Host phylogeny matters: Examining sources of variation in infection risk by blood parasites across a tropical montane bird community in India. Parasites Vectors 2020, 13, 536. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  182. Nourani, L.; Djadid, N.D.; Rabiee, K.; Mezerji, M.S.; Shakiba, M.; Bakhshi, H.; Shokrollahi, B.; Farahani, R.K. Detection of haemosporidian parasites in wild and domestic birds in northern and central provinces of Iran: Introduction of new lineages and hosts. Int. J. Parasitol. Parasites Wildl. 2020, 13, 203–212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  183. Dharmarajan, G.; Gupta, P.; Vishnudas, C.K.; Robin, V.V. Anthropogenic disturbance favours generalist over specialist parasites in bird communities: Implications for risk of disease emergence. Ecol. Lett. 2021, 24, 1859–1868. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  184. Inumaru, M.; Odaya, Y.; Sato, Y.; Marzal, A. First records of prevalence and diversity of avian haemosporidia in snipe species (genus Gallinago) of Japan. Int. J. Parasitol. Parasites Wildl. 2021, 16, 5–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  185. Lertwatcharasarakul, P.; Salakij, C.; Prasopsom, P.; Kasorndorkbua, C.; Jakthong, P.; Santavakul, M.; Suwanasaeng, P.; Ploypan, R. Molecular and Morphological Analyses of Leucocytozoon Parasites (Haemosporida: Leucocytozoidae) in Raptors from Thailand. Acta Parasitol. 2021, 66, 1406–1416. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  186. Nourani, L.; Baghkheirati, A.A.; Zargar, M.; Karimi, V.; Djadid, N.D. Haemoproteosis and avian malaria in Columbidae and Corvidae from Iran. Vet. Med. Sci. 2021, 7, 2043–2050. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  187. Shokrani, H.; Norouzian, H.; Dezfoulian, O. Exo-erythrocytic stages of Haemoproteus sp. in common buzzard (Buteo buteo): A histopathological and molecular study. Int. J. Parasitol. Parasites Wildl. 2021, 16, 64–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  188. Honjo, Y.; Fukumoto, S.; Sakamoto, H.; Hikosaka, K. New PCR primers targeting the cytochrome b gene reveal diversity of Leucocytozoon lineages in an individual host. Parasitol. Res. 2022, 121, 3313–3320. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  189. Inumaru, M.; Nishiumi, I.; Kawakami, K.; Sato, Y. A widespread survey of avian haemosporidia in deceased wild birds of Japan: The hidden value of personally collected samples. J. Vet. Med. Sci. 2022, 84, 1253–1260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  190. Han, Y.; Hellgren, O.; Wu, Q.; Liu, J.; Jin, T.; Bensch, S.; Ding, P. Seasonal variations of intensity of avian malaria infection in the Thousand Island Lake System, China. Parasites Vectors 2023, 16, 218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  191. Kim, M.; Bae, J.; Oh, B.; Rhim, H.; Yang, M.-S.; Yang, S.; Kim, B.; Han, J.-I. Surveillance of wild animals carrying infectious agents based on high-throughput screening platform in the Republic of Korea. BMC Vet. Res. 2023, 19, 158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  192. Adriano, E.A.; Cordeiro, N.S. Prevalence and intensity of Haemoproteus columbae in three species of wild doves from Brazil. Memórias Do Inst. Oswaldo Cruz 2001, 96, 175–178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  193. Garvin, M.C.; Marra, P.P.; Crain, S.K. Prevalence of Hematozoa in Overwintering American Redstarts (Setophaga ruticilla): No Evidence for Local Transmission. J. Wildl. Dis. 2004, 40, 115–118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  194. Allgayer, M.C.; Guedes, N.M.R.; Chiminazzo, C.; Cziulik, M.; Weimer, T.A. Clinical pathology and parasitologic evaluation of free-living nestlings of the hyacinth macaw (Anodorhynchus hyacinthinus). J. Wildl. Dis. 2009, 45, 972–981. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  195. Belo, N.O.; Pinheiro, R.T.; Reis, E.S.; Ricklefs, R.E.; Braga, É.M. Prevalence and Lineage Diversity of Avian Haemosporidians from Three Distinct Cerrado Habitats in Brazil. PLoS ONE 2011, 6, e17654. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  196. Belo, N.O.; Rodríguez-Ferraro, A.; Braga, E.M.; Ricklefs, R.E. Diversity of avian haemosporidians in arid zones of northern Venezuela. Parasitology 2012, 139, 1021–1028. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  197. Mijares, A.; Rosales, R.; Silva-Iturriza, A. Hemosporidian Parasites in Forest Birds from Venezuela: Genetic Lineage Analyses. Avian Dis. 2012, 56, 583–588. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  198. Matta, N.E.; Pacheco, M.A.; Escalante, A.A.; Valkiūnas, G.; Ayerbe-Quiñones, F.; Acevedo-Cendales, L.D. Description and molecular characterization of Haemoproteus macrovacuolatus n. sp. (Haemosporida, Haemoproteidae), a morphologically unique blood parasite of black-bellied whistling duck (Dendrocygna autumnalis) from South America. Parasitol. Res. 2014, 113, 2991–3000. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  199. Sallaberry-Pincheira, N.; Gonzalez-Acuña, D.; Herrera-Tello, Y.; Dantas, G.P.M.; Luna-Jorquera, G.; Frere, E.; Valdés-Velasquez, A.; Simeone, A.; Vianna, J.A. Molecular Epidemiology of Avian Malaria in Wild Breeding Colonies of Humboldt and Magellanic Penguins in South America. EcoHealth 2015, 12, 267–277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  200. Svensson-Coelho, M.; Silva, G.T.; Santos, S.S.; Miranda, L.S.; Araújo-Silva, L.E.; Ricklefs, R.E.; Miyaki, C.Y.; Maldonado-Coelho, M. Lower Detection Probability of Avian Plasmodium in Blood Compared to Other Tissues. J. Parasitol. 2016, 102, 559–561. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  201. Vanstreels, R.E.T.; Uhart, M.; Rago, V.; Hurtado, R.; Epiphanio, S.; Catão-Dias, J.L. Do blood parasites infect Magellanic penguins (Spheniscus magellanicus) in the wild? Prospective investigation and climatogeographic considerations. Parasitology 2017, 144, 698–705. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  202. Werther, K.; Luzzi, M.d.C.; Gonçalves, L.R.; de Oliveira, J.P.; Alves Junior, J.R.F.; Machado, R.Z.; André, M.R. Arthropod-borne agents in wild Orinoco geese (Neochen jubata) in Brazil. Comp. Immunol. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 2017, 55, 30–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  203. Ferreira-Junior, F.C.; Dutra, D.d.A.; Silveira, P.; Pacheco, R.C.; Witter, R.; Ramos, D.G.d.S.; Pacheco, M.A.; Escalante, A.A.; Braga, É.M. A new pathogen spillover from domestic to wild animals: Plasmodium juxtanucleare infects free-living passerines in Brazil. Parasitology 2018, 145, 1949–1958. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  204. Tostes, R.; Dias, R.J.P.; Oliveira, L.; de Senra, M.V.X.; Massard, C.L.; D’Agosto, M. Molecular and Morphological Characterization of a Brazilian Lineage of Plasmodium (Novyella) Unalis in Turdus spp. (Passeriformes) of the Atlantic Forest, with Remarks on New Hosts and High Genetic Variation. J. Parasitol. 2018, 104, 70–78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  205. de Oliveira, L.; Cedrola, F.; Senra, M.V.X.; Scopel, K.K.G.; Martinele, I.; Tostes, R.; Dias, R.J.P.; D’Agosto, M. Polymorphism evidence in Plasmodium (Haemamoeba) lutzi Lucena, 1939 (Apicomplexa, Haemosporida) isolated from Brazilian wild birds. Parasitol. Int. 2019, 70, 70–76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  206. Ewbank, A.C.; Strefezzi, R.d.F.; Sacristán, C.; Kolesnikovas, C.K.M.; Martins, A.; Mayorga, L.F.S.P.; Vanstreels, R.E.T.; Catão-Dias, J.L. Comparative morphometric evaluation of hepatic hemosiderosis in wild Magellanic penguins (Spheniscus magellanicus) infected with different Plasmodium spp. Subgenera. Rev. Bras. De Parasitol. Veterinária 2019, 28, 68–79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  207. de Oliveira, L.; Barino, G.T.M.; Rossi, M.F.; D’Agosto, M.; Dias, R.J.P.; Santos, H.A. Morphological and molecular characterization of Haemoproteus coatneyi and Haemoproteus erythrogravidus (Haemosporida: Haemoproteidae) in Passeriformes in Brazil’s Atlantic Forest. Rev. Bras. De Parasitol. Vet. Braz. J. Vet. Parasitol. Orgao Do Col. Bras. De Parasitol. Vet. 2020, 29, e011520. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  208. Oliveira, L.; Dias, R.J.P.; Rossi, M.F.; D’Agosto, M.; Santos, H.A. Molecular diversity and coalescent species delimitation of avian haemosporidian parasites in an endemic bird species of South America. Parasitol. Res. 2020, 119, 4033–4047. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  209. Matoso, R.V.; Cedrola, F.; Barino, G.T.M.; Dias, R.J.P.; Rossi, M.F.; D’Agosto, M. New morphological and molecular data for Haemoproteus (H.) paramultipigmentatus in the Atlantic Forest of Brazil. Parasitol. Int. 2021, 84, 102375. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  210. Morel, A.P.; Webster, A.; Prusch, F.; Anicet, M.; Marsicano, G.; Trainini, G.; Stocker, J.; Giani, D.; Bandarra, P.M.; da Rocha, M.I.S.; et al. Molecular detection and phylogenetic relationship of Haemosporida parasites in free-ranging wild raptors from Brazil. Vet. Parasitol. Reg. Stud. Rep. 2021, 23, 100521. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  211. Alvarez-Londoño, J.; Cardona-Romero, M.; Martínez-Sánchez, E.T.; Ossa-López, P.A.; Pérez-Cárdenas, J.E.; Gonzalez, A.D.; Rivera-Páez, F.A.; Castaño-Villa, G.J. Avian haemosporidian (Haemosporida: Plasmodium and Haemoproteus) in the department of Arauca, Colombian Orinoquia region. Parasitol. Res. 2022, 121, 1775–1787. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  212. da Silva, B.R.; Vanstreels, R.E.T.; Serafini, P.P.; Fontana, C.S.; da Silva, T.W.; Chiarani, E.; Carvalho, A.M.; Ferreira Junior, F.C.; Braga, É.M.; Locatelli-Dittrich, R. Blood parasites of passerines in the Brazilian Pampas and their implications for a potential population supplementation program for the endangered Yellow Cardinal (Gubernatrix cristata). Parasitol. Res. 2022, 121, 3203–3215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  213. Lima, M.B.; Borges, A.; Wolf, M.; Santos, H.A.; Dias, R.J.P.; Rossi, M.F. First record of Trypanosoma (Ornithotrypanum) infecting Neotropical birds. Parasitol. Res. 2024, 123, 156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  214. Cadena-Ortiz, H.; Mantilla, J.S.; de Aguilar, J.R.; Flores, D.; Bahamonde, D.; Matta, N.E.; Bonaccorso, E. Avian haemosporidian infections in rufous-collared sparrows in an Andean dry forest: Diversity and factors related to prevalence and parasitaemia. Parasitology 2019, 146, 765–773. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  215. Moens, M.A.J.; Pérez-Tris, J. Discovering potential sources of emerging pathogens: South America is a reservoir of generalist avian blood parasites. Int. J. Parasitol. 2016, 46, 41–49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  216. Travis, E.K.; Vargas, F.H.; Merkel, J.; Gottdenker, N.; Miller, R.E.; Parker, P.G. Hematology, serum chemistry, and serology of galápagos penguins (Spheniscus mendiculus) in the galápagos islands, ecuador. J. Wildl. Dis. 2006, 42, 625–632. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  217. de Freitas, R.V.M.; Barino, G.T.M.; Cedrola, F.; Dias, R.J.P.; D’Agosto, M.; Massard, C.L. Insights on the taxonomy of Haemoproteus parasites infecting cracid birds. Parasitol. Int. 2023, 94, 102730. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  218. Ashford, R.W.; Palmer, T.T.; Ash, J.S.; Bray, R.S. Blood parasites of Ethiopian birds. 1. General survey. J. Wildl. Dis. 1976, 12, 409–426. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  219. Ayeni, J.S.O.; Dipeolu, O.O.; Okaeme, A.N. Parasitic infections of the grey-breasted helmet guinea-fowl (Numida meleagris galeata) in Nigeria. Vet. Parasitol. 1983, 12, 59–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  220. Earlé, R.A.; Horak, I.G.; Huchzermeyer, F.W.; Bennett, G.F.; Braack, L.E.; Penzhorn, B.L. The prevalence of blood parasites in helmeted guineafowls, Numida meleagris, in the Kruger National Park. Onderstepoort J. Vet. Res. 1991, 58, 145–147. [Google Scholar]
  221. Graczyk, T.K.; Brossy, J.J.; Plös, A.; Stoskopf, M.K. Avian malaria seroprevalence in Jackass penguins (Spheniscus demersus) in South Africa. J. Parasitol. 1995, 81, 703–707. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  222. Grim, K.C.; Van der Merwe, E.; Sullivan, M.; Parsons, N.; McCutchan, T.F.; Cranfield, M. Plasmodium juxtanucleare associated with mortality in black-footed penguins (Spheniscus demersus) admitted to a rehabilitation center. J. Zoo Wildl. Med. 2003, 34, 250–255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  223. Savage, A.F.; Ariey, F.; Greiner, E.C. Hematozoa of the avian family vangidae (the vangas). J. Parasitol. 2004, 90, 1475–1479. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  224. Savage, A.F.; Greiner, E.C. Hematozoa of the avian family brachypteraciidae (the ground-rollers). J. Parasitol. 2004, 90, 1468–1472. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  225. Savage, A.F.; Greiner, E.C. Haemoproteids of the avian family dicruridae (the drongos). J. Parasitol. 2005, 91, 131–134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  226. Valkiūnas, G.; Sehgal, R.N.M.; Iezhova, T.A.; Smith, T.B. Further Observations on the Blood Parasites of Birds in Uganda. J. Wildl. Dis. 2005, 41, 580–587. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  227. Savage, A.F.; Ariey, F.; Greiner, E.C. Leucocytozoon atkinsoni n. sp. (Apicomplexa: Leucocytozoidae) from the avian family Timaliidae. Syst. Parasitol. 2006, 64, 105–109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  228. Chasar, A.; Loiseau, C.; Valkiūnas, G.; Iezhova, T.; Smith, T.B.; Sehgal, R.N.M. Prevalence and diversity patterns of avian blood parasites in degraded African rainforest habitats. Mol. Ecol. 2009, 18, 4121–4133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  229. Savage, A.F.; Robert, V.; Goodman, S.M.; Raharimanga, V.; Raherilalao, M.J.; Andrianarimisa, A.; Ariey, F.; Greiner, E.C. Blood Parasites in Birds from Madagascar. J. Wildl. Dis. 2009, 45, 907–920. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  230. Parsons, N.J.; Gous, T.A.; Schaefer, A.M.; Vanstreels, R.E.T. Health evaluation of African penguins (Spheniscus demersus) in southern Africa. Onderstepoort J. Vet. Res. 2016, 83, a1147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  231. Boundenga, L.; Perkins, S.L.; Ollomo, B.; Rougeron, V.; Leroy, E.M.; Renaud, F.; Prugnolle, F. Haemosporidian Parasites of Reptiles and Birds from Gabon, Central Africa. J. Parasitol. 2017, 103, 330–337. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  232. Martínez-de la Puente, J.; Eberhart-Phillips, L.J.; Cristina Carmona-Isunza, M.; Zefania, S.; Navarro, M.J.; Kruger, O.; Hoffman, J.I.; Székely, T.; Figuerola, J. Extremely low Plasmodium prevalence in wild plovers and coursers from Cape Verde and Madagascar. Malar. J. 2017, 16, 243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  233. Chaisi, M.E.; Osinubi, S.T.; Dalton, D.L.; Suleman, E. Occurrence and diversity of avian haemosporidia in Afrotropical landbirds. Int. J. Parasitol. Parasites Wildl. 2018, 8, 36–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  234. Tchoumbou, M.A.; Mayi, M.P.A.; Malange, E.N.F.; Foncha, F.D.; Kowo, C.; Fru-Cho, J.; Tchuinkam, T.; Awah-Ndukum, J.; Dorazio, R.; Nota Anong, D.; et al. Effect of deforestation on prevalence of avian haemosporidian parasites and mosquito abundance in a tropical rainforest of Cameroon. Int. J. Parasitol. 2020, 50, 63–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  235. Musa, S.; Mackenstedt, U.; Woog, F.; Dinkel, A. Untangling the actual infection status: Detection of avian haemosporidian parasites of three Malagasy bird species using microscopy, multiplex PCR, and nested PCR methods. Parasitol. Res. 2022, 121, 2817–2829. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  236. Musa, S. Mitochondrial Genome Amplification of Avian Haemosporidian Parasites from Single-Infected Wildlife Samples Using an Innovative Nested PCR Approach. Res. Sq. 2023, 122.12, 2967–2975. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  237. Vanstreels, R.E.T.; Chagas, C.R.F.; Valkiūnas, G.; dos Anjos, C.C.; Parsons, N.J.; Roberts, D.G.; Snyman, A.; Hurtado, R.; Kirchgatter, K.; Ludynia, K.; et al. Haemoproteus jenniae (Haemoproteidae, Haemosporida) infects gulls (Larus spp.) in South Africa, with redescription of Haemoproteus skuae. Parasitology 2023, 150, 1286–1295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  238. Holz, P. Disseminated granulomas caused by protozoan megaloschizonts in superb lyrebirds (Menura novaehollandiae). Aust. Vet. J. 1997, 75, 672–673. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  239. Peirce, M.A.; Lederer, R.; Adlard, R.D.; O’Donoghue, P.J. Pathology associated with endogenous development of haematozoa in birds from southeast Queensland. Avian Pathol. 2004, 33, 445–450. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  240. Baillie, S.M.; Gudex-Cross, D.; Barraclough, R.K.; Blanchard, W.; Brunton, D.H. Patterns in avian malaria at founder and source populations of an endemic New Zealand passerine. Parasitol. Res. 2012, 111, 2077–2089. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  241. Cannell, B.L.; Krasnec, K.V.; Campbell, K.; Jones, H.I.; Miller, R.D.; Stephens, N. The pathology and pathogenicity of a novel Haemoproteus spp. Infection in wild Little Penguins (Eudyptula minor). Vet. Parasitol. 2013, 197, 74–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  242. Niebuhr, C.N.; Poulin, R.; Tompkins, D.M. Is Avian Malaria Playing a Role in Native Bird Declines in New Zealand? Testing Hypotheses along an Elevational Gradient. PLoS ONE 2016, 11, e0165918. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  243. Gartrell, B.; Agnew, D.; Alley, M.; Carpenter, T.; Ha, H.J.; Howe, L.; Hunter, S.; McInnes, K.; Munday, R.; Roe, W.; et al. Investigation of a mortality cluster in wild adult yellow-eyed penguins (Megadyptes antipodes) at Otago Peninsula, New Zealand. Avian Pathol. 2017, 46, 278–288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  244. Sijbranda, D.C.; Gartrell, B.D.; Grange, Z.L.; Howe, L. Use of a real-time PCR to explore the intensity of Plasmodium spp. Infections in native, endemic and introduced New Zealand birds. Parasitology 2017, 144, 1743–1751. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  245. Jiang, Y.; Brice, B.; Nguyen, M.; Loh, R.; Greay, T.; Adlard, R.; Ryan, U.; Yang, R. Further characterisation of Leucocytozoon podargii in wild tawny frogmouths (Podargus strigoides) in Western Australia. Parasitol. Res. 2019, 118, 1833–1840. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  246. Filion, A.; Deschamps, L.; Niebuhr, C.N.; Poulin, R. Anthropogenic landscape alteration promotes higher disease risk in wild New Zealand avian communities. PLoS ONE 2022, 17, e0265568. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  247. Sousa, O.E.; Herman, C.M. Blood parasites of birds from Chiriqui and Panama Provinces in the Republic of Panama. J. Wildl. Dis. 1982, 18, 205–221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  248. Mora-Chavarría, E.; Umaña-Castro, R.; Abou-Madi, N.; Solano-González, S.; Retamosa-Izaguirre, M.; Jiménez-Soto, M.; Blanco-Peña, K. Health assessment of captive psittacine species in prerelease programs at costa rican rescue centers. J. Zoo Wildl. Med. 2017, 48, 1135–1145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  249. Quillfeldt, P.; Martínez, J.; Hennicke, J.; Ludynia, K.; Gladbach, A.; Masello, J.F.; Riou, S.; Merino, S. Hemosporidian blood parasites in seabirds—A comparative genetic study of species from Antarctic to tropical habitats. Naturwissenschaften 2010, 97, 809–817. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  250. Palinauskas, V.; Valkiūnas, G.; Bolshakov, C.V.; Bensch, S. Plasmodium relictum (lineage P-SGS1): Effects on experimentally infected passerine birds. Exp. Parasitol. 2008, 120, 372–380. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  251. Senar, J.C. Keel and Tarsus Length May Provide a Good Predictor of Avian Body Size. ARDEA-WAGENINGEN. 1977. Available online: https://www.academia.edu/2608794/Keel_and_tarsus_length_may_provide_a_good_predictor_of_avian_body_size (accessed on 12 November 2024).
  252. Hicks, O.; Burthe, S.J.; Daunt, F.; Newell, M.; Butler, A.; Ito, M.; Sato, K.; Green, J.A. The energetic cost of parasitism in a wild population. Proc. Biol. Sci. 2018, 285, 20180489. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  253. Schoepf, I.; Olson, S.; Moore, I.T.; Bonier, F. Experimental reduction of haemosporidian infection affects maternal reproductive investment, parental behaviour and offspring condition. Proc. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 2022, 289, 20221978. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  254. Tikhomirova, I.A. The effect of dehydration on macro- and microrheological blood properties. Clin. Hemorheol. Microcirc. 2002, 26, 85–90. [Google Scholar]
  255. de Jonge, G.; Dos Santos, T.L.; Cruz, B.R.; Simionatto, M.; Bittencourt, J.I.M.; Krum, E.A.; Moss, M.F.; Borato, D.C.K. Interference of in vitro hemolysis complete blood count. J. Clin. Lab. Anal. 2018, 32, e22396. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  256. Cadenas, E. Mechanisms of Oxygen Activation and Reactive Oxygen Species Detoxification. In Oxidative Stress and Antioxidant Defenses in Biology; Ahmad, S., Ed.; Springer: New York, NY, USA, 1995; pp. 1–61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  257. Sapolsky, R.M.; Romero, L.M.; Munck, A.U. How Do Glucocorticoids Influence Stress Responses? Integrating Permissive, Suppressive, Stimulatory, and Preparative Actions. Endocr. Rev. 2000, 21, 55–89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  258. Lochmiller, R.L.; Deerenberg, C. Trade-offs in evolutionary immunology: Just what is the cost of immunity? Oikos 2000, 88, 87–98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  259. Sherman, I.W. Biochemistry of Plasmodium (malarial parasites). Microbiol. Rev. 1979, 43, 453–495. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  260. Martin, R.E.; Kirk, K. Transport of the essential nutrient isoleucine in human erythrocytes infected with the malaria parasite Plasmodium falciparum. Blood 2007, 109, 2217–2224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  261. Giorgi, M.S.; Arlettaz, R.; Christe, P.; Vogel, P. The energetic grooming costs imposed by a parasitic mite (Spinturnix myoti) upon its bat host (Myotis myotis). Proc. Biol. Sci. 2001, 268, 2071–2075. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  262. Maturana, C.R.; de Oliveira, A.D.; Nadal, S.; Bilalli, B.; Serrat, F.Z.; Soley, M.E.; Igual, E.S.; Bosch, M.; Lluch, A.V.; Abelló, A.; et al. Advances and challenges in automated malaria diagnosis using digital microscopy imaging with artificial intelligence tools: A review. Front. Microbiol. 2022, 13, 1006659. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  263. Kramer, M.H.; Harris, D.J. Avian Blood Collection. J. Exot. Pet Med. 2010, 19, 82–86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  264. Garnham, P.C.C. Locomotion in the Parasitic Protozoa. Biol. Rev. 1966, 41, 561–586. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  265. Jarvi, S.I.; Schultz, J.J.; Atkinson, C.T. PCR diagnostics underestimate the prevalence of avian malaria (Plasmodium relictum) in experimentally-infected passerines. J. Parasitol. 2002, 88, 153–158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  266. Fallon, S.M.; Ricklefs, R.E.; Swanson, B.L.; Bermingham, E. Detecting avian malaria: An improved polymerase chain reaction diagnostic. J. Parasitol. 2003, 89, 1044–1047. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  267. Valkiūnas, G.; Iezhova, T.A.; Križanauskienė, A.; Palinauskas, V.; Sehgal, R.N.M.; Bensch, S. A Comparative Analysis of Microscopy and PCR-Based Detection Methods for Blood Parasites. J. Parasitol. 2008, 94, 1395–1401. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  268. Hellgren, O.; Waldenström, J.; Bensch, S. A new pcr assay for simultaneous studies of leucocytozoon, plasmodium, and haemoproteus from avian blood. J. Parasitol. 2004, 90, 797–802. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. Flow diagram of articles reviewed for the study, following PRISMA 2020 statement [21].
Figure 1. Flow diagram of articles reviewed for the study, following PRISMA 2020 statement [21].
Animals 15 02570 g001
Figure 2. Comparative line chart of annual publications on hemoparasites in wild birds and worldwide scientific publications.
Figure 2. Comparative line chart of annual publications on hemoparasites in wild birds and worldwide scientific publications.
Animals 15 02570 g002
Figure 3. (A) Distribution of types of original articles on hemoparasites in wild birds. (B) Number of descriptive articles providing data on the main genera of avian hemoparasites. Most of the studies address more than one hemoparasite genus.
Figure 3. (A) Distribution of types of original articles on hemoparasites in wild birds. (B) Number of descriptive articles providing data on the main genera of avian hemoparasites. Most of the studies address more than one hemoparasite genus.
Animals 15 02570 g003
Figure 4. Worldwide distribution of original studies published from 1959 to 2024 about hemoparasites in wild birds.
Figure 4. Worldwide distribution of original studies published from 1959 to 2024 about hemoparasites in wild birds.
Animals 15 02570 g004
Figure 5. (A) Representation of the avian taxonomic orders most assessed over the 188 descriptive studies included in the systematic review. The number of species analyzed within each order is detailed in the graphic’s margin. The asterisk (*) represents the compilation of the least representative orders (with less than 10 species each). (B) Details of the proportions of the least representative orders.
Figure 5. (A) Representation of the avian taxonomic orders most assessed over the 188 descriptive studies included in the systematic review. The number of species analyzed within each order is detailed in the graphic’s margin. The asterisk (*) represents the compilation of the least representative orders (with less than 10 species each). (B) Details of the proportions of the least representative orders.
Animals 15 02570 g005
Figure 6. Frequency of use of diagnostic techniques in the reviewed studies. ‘Others’ category includes serology, including ELISA, in situ hybridization (ISH), immunohistochemistry, the buffy coat method, electron microscopy, and genomic sequencing, among others.
Figure 6. Frequency of use of diagnostic techniques in the reviewed studies. ‘Others’ category includes serology, including ELISA, in situ hybridization (ISH), immunohistochemistry, the buffy coat method, electron microscopy, and genomic sequencing, among others.
Animals 15 02570 g006
Figure 7. Temporal trends in the use of the four most common diagnostic techniques (1959–2023).
Figure 7. Temporal trends in the use of the four most common diagnostic techniques (1959–2023).
Animals 15 02570 g007
Figure 8. Distribution of the five most frequent hemoparasites detected by the four most employed diagnostic techniques in the reviewed studies.
Figure 8. Distribution of the five most frequent hemoparasites detected by the four most employed diagnostic techniques in the reviewed studies.
Animals 15 02570 g008
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Alvarado-Piqueras, A.; Gómez-Muñoz, M.T.; Martín-Maldonado, B. Hemoparasites in Wild Birds: A Systematic Review of Their Ecology and Clinical Implications. Animals 2025, 15, 2570. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani15172570

AMA Style

Alvarado-Piqueras A, Gómez-Muñoz MT, Martín-Maldonado B. Hemoparasites in Wild Birds: A Systematic Review of Their Ecology and Clinical Implications. Animals. 2025; 15(17):2570. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani15172570

Chicago/Turabian Style

Alvarado-Piqueras, Alberto, María Teresa Gómez-Muñoz, and Bárbara Martín-Maldonado. 2025. "Hemoparasites in Wild Birds: A Systematic Review of Their Ecology and Clinical Implications" Animals 15, no. 17: 2570. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani15172570

APA Style

Alvarado-Piqueras, A., Gómez-Muñoz, M. T., & Martín-Maldonado, B. (2025). Hemoparasites in Wild Birds: A Systematic Review of Their Ecology and Clinical Implications. Animals, 15(17), 2570. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani15172570

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop