Next Article in Journal
A Broad Wildlife Survey of Influenza A Virus in the Orinoco Flooded Savannas from Colombia: New Reports and Perspectives
Previous Article in Journal
Natural Product-Induced Modulation of Androstenone Metabolism in Porcine Hepatocytes
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Phenotypic Variation Patterns in Oecomys catherinae (Rodentia: Sigmodontinae): Craniodental Morphometric Analysis and Its Relationship with Latitudinal Variation in the Atlantic Forest and Cerrado Biomes

by
Paola Santos da Mata
1,*,
Thiago dos Santos Cardoso
2,
Cibele Rodrigues Bonvicino
2 and
Roberto do Val Vilela
2,*
1
Departamento de Genética, Instituto de Biologia, Centro de Ciências da Saúde, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Ilha do Fundão—Cidade Universitária, Rio de Janeiro 21941-617, RJ, Brazil
2
Laboratório de Biologia e Parasitologia de Mamíferos Silvestres Reservatórios, Instituto Oswaldo Cruz (IOC/Fiocruz), Avenida Brasil 4365, Manguinhos, Rio de Janeiro 21040-900, RJ, Brazil
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Animals 2025, 15(15), 2200; https://doi.org/10.3390/ani15152200
Submission received: 10 June 2025 / Revised: 17 July 2025 / Accepted: 22 July 2025 / Published: 26 July 2025
(This article belongs to the Section Wildlife)

Simple Summary

Understanding how animals adapt to natural environments reveals essential physical and behavioral traits for survival. We examined skull shape variation in the arboreal rodent Oecomys catherinae across two Brazilian biomes, the Atlantic Forest and Cerrado, and its relationship with latitude. Through cranial and dental measurements of 45 specimens from scientific collections, no significant differences were observed between males and females. However, cranial morphology differed between biomes, likely due to dietary adaptations and ecological pressures. Southern populations exhibited slightly larger cranial dimensions than northern counterparts, consistent with Bergmann’s rule (which posits that larger body sizes occur in colder climates). These results demonstrate how environmental pressures shape physical traits in small mammals. Further research is required to determine whether these differences reflect genetic adaptations or plastic responses (non-heritable changes induced by local environments).

Abstract

The arboreal rodent Oecomys catherinae, which has a wide geographic distribution across Brazilian biomes, provides a model for investigating environmental influences on morphological variation. We assessed craniodental differences between the Atlantic Forest and Cerrado biomes, as well as along latitudinal gradients, using 45 specimens from 18 localities. Linear morphometric analyses (21 measurements) revealed no significant sexual dimorphism, allowing for pooled analyses. Principal Component Discriminant Analysis (DAPC) confirmed significant morphological divergence between biomes (72% accuracy, p < 0.01). We identified bony palate length (BPL) as the most discriminating variable, with higher values in the Atlantic Forest, suggesting a possible dietary adaptation in response to ecological pressures. Latitudinal effects were modest (adjusted R2 = 0.05) although significant (F1,43 = 3.63; p = 0.03), with southern populations exhibiting larger cranial dimensions than northern ones. We conclude that biome type and latitude played important roles in shaping cranial morphology in O. catherinae populations.

1. Introduction

The genus Oecomys (Rodentia: Cricetidae) comprises semi-arboreal rodents with morphological and behavioral adaptations for efficiently utilizing arboreal strata in humid tropical forests [1]. These nocturnal species rely on vegetation for locomotion, feeding, and nesting, occupying both arboreal strata and the ground [2]. Morphological traits such as reduced limb proportions reflect this arboreal specialization, making them the most anatomically adapted Oryzomyini to this lifestyle [3].
The taxonomic classification of Oecomys is challenging due to high interspecific similarity, requiring integrative analyses of morphological and genetic traits [4,5]. This complexity has left many species unresolved, underscoring the need for further studies [6,7,8]. Additionally, the lack of long-term autecological studies represents a significant gap in understanding their biology and environmental interactions [2]. Among the species of Oecomys, widely distributed across South America, Oecomys catherinae (Thomas, 1909) [9] stands out due to its broad geographic range in Brazil, occurring along the eastern region from the state of Santa Catarina to Paraíba [2,10,11]. Oecomys catherinae occupies multiple biomes, including the Amazon, Atlantic Forest, and Cerrado, being one of the most widely distributed taxa in Brazil [12].
Phenotypic variation in small mammals, such as those of the genus Oecomys, can be measured through linear or geometric morphometric analyses of craniodental structures [13,14]. When correlated with environmental gradients (e.g., latitude, habitat heterogeneity), these variations may reflect mechanisms like phenotypic plasticity or local adaptations [15]. Although studies have demonstrated these associations in Amazonian Sigmodontinae rodents [1], the underlying mechanisms (plasticity versus adaptation) remain poorly investigated in widely distributed Oryzomyini such as O. catherinae.
The Atlantic Forest and Cerrado, as biodiversity hotspots [16], provide contrasting environmental gradients for O. catherinae. The Atlantic Forest exhibits remarkable altitudinal (0–2700 m) and latitudinal (3–30° S) heterogeneity, encompassing humid forests and semi-humid formations across diverse soils [17,18]. In contrast, the Cerrado combines seasonal savannas (cerrado sensu stricto), gallery forests, veredas, and rocky outcrop vegetation (campos rupestres) on acidic, oligotrophic soils under a seasonal tropical climate [19,20].
We hypothesize that craniodental morphology in O. catherinae varies significantly along latitudinal variation and between biomes, reflecting both local adaptations and phenotypic plasticity to environmental variation. To test this, we conducted morphometric analyses on specimens from the Atlantic Forest and Cerrado biomes, correlating morphological variation with environmental parameters (latitude and biome type) using multivariate statistical approaches. Understanding these patterns advances knowledge of O. catherinae biology and the mechanisms of adaptation and phenotypic plasticity in neotropical small mammals. Furthermore, this study reinforces the importance of integrating morphometric and ecological approaches to elucidate how environmental factors may shape phenotypic diversity across geographic scales and ecological contexts.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Sampling and Specimens Localities

Morphometric studies were conducted using small rodent specimens from the scientific collections of the Museu Nacional, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro (MN/UFRJ), and the Coleção Integrada de Mamíferos Reservatórios Silvestres, Instituto Oswaldo Cruz, Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (COLMASTO/IOC/FIOCRUZ). Forty-five specimens of O. catherinae were selected based on their documented geographic origin, availability of complete biometric data, and proper craniodental preservation (Table S1: Geographic location, sex, and age classification of O. catherinae specimens).
Our sampling encompassed 18 localities, distributed across two biomes (Figure 1), The first is the Atlantic Forest biome, including the states of Bahia (Ilhéus), Rio de Janeiro (Cachoeiras de Macacu, Casimiro de Abreu, Guapimirim, Sumidouro), and São Paulo (Ubatuba), presenting habitats ranging from coastal lowland forests to montane formations. The second is the Cerrado biome, including the state of Tocantins (Dianópolis), Goiás (Anápolis, Aporé, Caiapônia, Caldas Novas, Luziânia, Planaltina, Niquelândia, Serranópolis), Distrito Federal (Brasília), Minas Gerais (Pirapetinga), and Mato Grosso do Sul (Dois Irmãos do Buriti), covering vegetation types from open grasslands to forested savannas.

2.2. Age Classification and Morphometric Measurements

Specimens were classified into five age categories based on eruption stage and wear of the third molar (M3), following [21] (Figure 2, Table 1); only specimens from Classes 2 to 5 were included to avoid ontogenetic bias in morphometric analyses, excluding juveniles (Class 1).
For the identification of O. catherinae, the key anatomical structures were measured following protocols derived from previous rodent studies [21,22,23] with methodological adaptations specific to Oecomys morphology [2]. Measurements were taken in dorsal, ventral, and lateral views using a ZAAS digital caliper (150 mm), recording 21 craniodental parameters (Figure 3, Figure 4, Figure 5, Figure 6 and Figure 7, Table 2, Table S2: Mean values and standard deviation (SD) of morphometric variables measured from specimens of O. catherinae collected in different locations of the Brazilian Atlantic Forest and Cerrado). All measurements were taken three times by the same observer, and the mean value was used in analyses.

2.3. Data Analysis

Sexual dimorphism was analyzed to verify morphometric differences between male and female specimens. This was performed using PERMANOVA (Permutational Multivariate Analysis of Variance), based on a Bray–Curtis distance matrix [24], calculated from the measured morphometric variables. This determined whether females and males could be pooled for more robust sampling of phenotypic variation analyses.
Interbiome variation between Cerrado (N = 19) and Atlantic Forest (N = 26) populations was examined using discriminant analysis of principal components (DAPC) [25]. DAPC was selected for its ability to maximize between-group variation while minimizing within-group variation [25]. The optimal number of principal components was determined via cross-validation [26]. The statistical significance of the difference between biomes was also tested with PERMANOVA on the morphometric distance matrix. Furthermore, the effect of latitude on the morphometric variation in the species was investigated using distance-based redundancy analysis (db-RDA), with significance assessed by permutation testing [27]. This analysis aimed to investigate whether there is an influence of a given latitudinal gradient on the morphometry of O. catherinae.
In PERMANOVA and db-RDA, the F-statistic is the ratio of explained to residual mean squares. Its first degree of freedom represents the number of parameters tested, while the second corresponds to the residual degrees of freedom (calculated as the number of observations minus the number of estimated parameters). R2 is the proportion of variance explained by the model, and the p-value is the probability of obtaining such an F under the null hypothesis [28].
Analyses were conducted in R v4.4.1 [29]. DAPC used the ‘adegenet’ package v2.1.10 [30]. PERMANOVA, distance matrices, permutation tests, and db-RDA employed the ‘vegan’ package v2.6-10 [31]. A 5% significance threshold was applied [32].

3. Results

3.1. Sexual Dimorphism

The PERMANOVA results revealed no statistically significant sexual dimorphism (R2 = 0.06; F1,46 = 2.73; p = 0.08), indicating that male and female O. catherinae do not exhibit significant differences in morphometric traits. Consequently, all specimens (males and females) were included in subsequent analyses.

3.2. Comparison Between Biome Populations

DAPC comparing O. catherinae populations from the Cerrado and Atlantic Forest biomes retained six principal components, which explained approximately 96% of the total variation. The analysis correctly classified 72% of specimens into their respective biome groups. Significant morphometric differences were detected between the two biomes (R2 = 0.18; F1,46 = 10.36; p < 0.01; Figure 8). The analysis identified BPL as the most influential morphometric variable in distinguishing the groups (Figure 9).

3.3. Latitude Effect

A statistically significant, although weak, influence of latitude on the morphometric variation in O. catherinae was recorded (F1,46 = 3.63; adjusted R2 = 0.05; p = 0.03). This indicates that the morphometry of the specimens varies with latitude, with a general tendency to increase at higher latitudes (Figure 10). Specifically, specimens from southern localities (farther from the Equator) tended to exhibit larger morphometric measurements (e.g., cranial or dental dimensions), while those from northern localities (closer to the Equator) showed smaller values. However, this latitudinal pattern was non-linear, as evidenced by the scatterplot, indicating that the rate of morphometric change does not follow a consistent gradient across latitudes.

3.4. Oecomys catherinae Craniodental Morphometric Comparison Between Atlantic Forest and Cerrado Biomes

In general, skulls of O. catherinae from the Atlantic Forest tend to be wider and longer, while those from the Cerrado show a somewhat more reduced and variable morphology. In this regard, Atlantic Forest specimens presented slightly larger skulls, with higher mean values for characteristics such as bony palate length (BPL: 6.89 ± 0.46 mm vs. 6.03 ± 0.92 mm), condylo-incisive length (CIL: 28.83 ± 1.41 mm vs. 28.06 ± 2.34 mm), and length of nasals (LN: 11.54 ± 0.91 mm vs. 9.64 ± 2.16 mm). Additionally, the lower length of diastema (LLD) was also greater in the Atlantic Forest (3.03 ± 0.31 mm) compared to in the Cerrado (2.71 ± 0.53 mm). On the other hand, length of rostrum (LR) showed slightly higher mean values in Cerrado specimens (9.28 ± 1.60 mm) than in Atlantic Forest specimens (9.16 ± 0.74 mm) (Table S2: Mean values and standard deviation (SD) of morphometric variables measured in O. catherinae specimens from Atlantic Forest and Cerrado locations).

4. Discussion

The absence of significant sexual dimorphism in O. catherinae corroborates previously documented patterns for the genus [33,34] and may reflect selective pressures for locomotor efficiency in arboreal habitats, which stabilize traits associated with this mode of movement [35]. This pattern contrasts with terrestrial rodents, where intense male competition for access to females leads to pronounced sexual dimorphism [36]. Despite this intersexual conservatism, O. catherinae exhibits significant morphological variation among populations from different biomes. Our DAPC analysis revealed morphometric divergence between Atlantic Forest and Cerrado individuals, with detectable latitude effects suggesting phenotypic plasticity along ecological gradients. This pattern supports our hypothesis and mirrors findings in other neotropical rodents: Holochilus brasiliensis showed biome-associated morphometric differences linked to vegetation structure [37], while four species (Akodon cursor, Cerradomys subflavus, Oligoryzomys nigripes, and Oxymycterus dasythrichus) demonstrated cranial morphology shifts along temperature and humidity gradients [38]. These cases reinforce the fundamental role of environmental factors in shaping morphological changes in small mammals.
Although latitude showed only modest effects on morphometric variation, this pattern aligns with both Bergmann’s rule (which predicts larger body size at higher latitudes) and latitudinal diversity patterns [39]. These trends may reflect adaptations to climatic pressures or resource availability, with environmental humidity—through its effect on heat exchange—representing one potentially significant factor influencing mammalian body size variation [40]. The macroecological trends identified here, while consistent with theoretical predictions [41,42], require future studies combining morphological time series and in situ ecological data. Such a multidimensional approach would prove particularly valuable for assessing latitudinal variation, where morphological patterns may emerge from contemporary ecological pressures, evolutionary legacies, or their interactions—not only in O. catherinae, but as a model for neotropical small mammal diversification.
Smaller skulls in the Cerrado compared to in the Atlantic Forest may reflect thermal adaptation, aligning with the trend of size reduction in warmer climates [43]. The longer snout in Cerrado individuals could be an adaptation to drier climates, facilitating thermoregulation and reducing water loss, similarly to patterns observed in other rodents where humidity and temperature influence rostral development [44]. The greater morphological variability in the Cerrado may reflect an adaptive response to environmental heterogeneity and seasonal resource fluctuations, while the uniformity in the Atlantic Forest may be associated with more stable ecological conditions, since body size is shaped by multiple ecological pressures (e.g., resource availability vs. competition) that act in concert—studying them in isolation may lead to misinterpretations [45].
Skull shape differences may also relate to diet: in the Cerrado, a longer rostrum may improve foraging efficiency in an environment with more dispersed resources and harder seeds, while in the Atlantic Forest, a more predictable diet may favor more uniform skulls [46,47]. These morphological differences in O. catherinae between the Atlantic Forest and Cerrado follow patterns observed in other rodents, where climate, resource availability, and competition shape cranial morphology [38]. The smaller size and greater variability in the Cerrado may represent adaptive responses to a hotter, drier, and more heterogeneous environment, while the Atlantic Forest’s uniformity reflects more stable ecological conditions.
Our spatially representative sampling across Atlantic Forest and Cerrado biomes, combined with detailed morphological analyses, provides a robust foundation for macroevolutionary inferences (i.e., large-scale evolutionary patterns across time/space) [48,49]. However, as this study focused solely on cranial variation, locomotor effects remain speculative. Larger samples would enhance resolution for detecting subtle interpopulation variation, while integrating ecological data (e.g., microclimate measurements) with molecular data (e.g., selection signatures in candidate genes) could clarify whether observed variations reflect phenotypic plasticity, local adaptation, gene–environment interactions, or cryptic speciation.
To advance this research, three complementary approaches appear particularly promising: (1) application of biomechanical models [50] to test form–function relationships across different contexts; (2) genomic integration [51] to discriminate plastic vs. genetic components of variation; and (3) temporal analyses of museum specimens [52] to assess historical responses to environmental change. Additionally, future studies could investigate postcranial skeletal variation (e.g., limb proportions, pelvic morphology) to test hypotheses about locomotor efficiency and its role in biome-specific adaptations.

5. Conclusions

Our study reveals that O. catherinae exhibits no significant sexual dimorphism, consistent with stabilizing selection for arboreal locomotion, while significant cranial divergence exists between Atlantic Forest and Cerrado populations. The biome-specific morphological differences likely reflect adaptations to warmer, drier climates and a more heterogeneous resource distribution in the Cerrado compared to in the stable Atlantic Forest environment. The influence of latitude on cranial morphometry was modest but aligned with ecogeographic trends, such as Bergmann’s rule.
To fully disentangle the roles of phenotypic plasticity and genetic adaptation, future studies should integrate genomic analyses with biomechanical modeling. Investigating postcranial morphology could further clarify how locomotor specialization interacts with environmental pressures. These findings underscore the importance of biome-driven selection in shaping morphological diversity in neotropical rodents, offering a framework for understanding adaptive responses to habitat variation.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/ani15152200/s1, Table S1: Geographic location, sex, and age classification of O. catherinae specimens; Table S2: Mean values and standard deviation (SD) of morphometric variables measured from specimens of O. catherinae collected in different locations of the Brazilian Atlantic Forest and Cerrado.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, P.S.d.M. and R.d.V.V.; data curation, P.S.d.M.; formal analysis, T.d.S.C.; investigation, P.S.d.M.; methodology, P.S.d.M.; project administration, R.d.V.V.; software, T.d.S.C.; supervision, C.R.B. and R.d.V.V.; visualization, T.d.S.C.; writing—original draft, P.S.d.M.; writing—review and editing, T.d.S.C., C.R.B., and R.d.V.V. All authors reviewed and approved the final version and take full responsibility for the research. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This study was funded by the Brazilian Coordination for the Improvement of Higher Education Personnel (CAPES) through a doctoral fellowship, aimed at supporting research and academic training, which enabled the development of this work. T.S.C. received grants from Fundação Carlos Chagas Filho de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado do Rio de Janeiro-FAPERJ, process number E-26/204.420/2021.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data supporting the findings of this study are included within the article (Supplementary Files). No new external data were generated.

Acknowledgments

We are grateful for UFRJ’s Genetics Graduate Program for institutional support, and for Museu Nacional/UFRJ and Instituto Oswaldo Cruz/Fiocruz for providing access to research materials. This work is part of Paola S. da Mata’s doctoral thesis in the Genetics Graduate Program at UFRJ. We extend particular thanks to curators João Alves de Oliveira and Marcelo Weksler (MN/UFRJ) and Paulo Sérgio D’Andrea (COLMASTO) for providing specimens. Special gratitude goes to Maíra Laeta, Adrielle Marins Cezar, Caroline Pires, Filipe Gudinho, and Vinícius Sudré for their invaluable research assistance. To all collaborators and staff members at both MN/UFRJ and IOC/Fiocruz, we express our deepest appreciation for their essential contributions.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript; or in the decision to publish the results.

Abbreviations

The following abbreviations are used in this manuscript:
MNMuseu Nacional
UFRJUniversidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro
COLMASTOColeção Integrada de Mamíferos Reservatórios Silvestres
IOCInstituto Oswaldo Cruz
FIOCRUZFundação Oswaldo Cruz
LBCELaboratório de Biologia e Controle da Esquistossomose
CRBCibele Rodrigues Bonvicino
BABahia
GOGoiás
MGMinas Gerais
MSMato Grosso do Sul
RJRio de Janeiro
SPSão Paulo
TOTocantins
DFDistrito Federal
M3Third Molar
M1First Molar
LNLength of Nasals
LRLength of Rostrum
BNBreadth of Nasals
BRBreadth of Rostrum
LIBLeast Interorbital Breadth
ZBZygomatic Breadth
BBBreadth of Braincase
BIFBreadth of the Incisive Foramina
BPLBony Palate Length
BBPBreadth across Bony Palate
BOCBreadth of the Occipital Condyles
LDLength of Diastema
BZPBreadth of the Zygomatic Plate
BHBraincase Height
ONLOccipitonasal Length
CILCondylo-Incisive Length
LLDLower Length of Diastema
CLLMCoronal Length of Lower Molars
MHMandibular Height
LM1-3Coronal Length of Maxillary Toothrow
WM1Width of the First Upper Molar (M1)
SDStandard Deviation
PERMANOVAPermutational Multivariate Analysis of Variance
DAPCDiscriminant Analysis of Principal Components
db-RDADistance-Based Redundancy Analysis
MANOVAMultivariate Analysis of Variance
CAP1First Canonical Axis

References

  1. Patton, J.L.; da Silva, M.N.F.; Malcolm, J.R. Mammals of the Rio Juruá and the evolutionary and ecological diversification of Amazonia. Bull. Am. Mus. Nat. Hist. 2000, 244, 1–306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Carleton, M.D.; Musser, G.G. Order Rodentia. In Mammals of South America: Volume 2—Rodents; Patton, J.L., Pardiñas, U.F.J., D’Elía, G., Eds.; University of Chicago Press: Chicago, IL, USA, 2015; pp. 393–417. [Google Scholar]
  3. Hershkovitz, P. Mice, land bridges, and Latin American faunal interchange. In Ectoparasites of Panama; Wenzel, R.L., Tipton, V.J., Eds.; Field Museum of Natural History: Chicago, IL, USA, 1960; pp. 725–751. [Google Scholar]
  4. Pardiñas, U.F.J.; Teta, P.; Salazar-Bravo, J. A new species of arboreal rat, Genus Oecomys (Rodentia: Cricetidae) from Chaco. J. Mammal. 2016, 97, 1177–1196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Saldanha, J.; Rossi, R.V. Integrative Analysis Supports a New Species of the Oecomys catherinae Complex (Rodentia: Cricetidae) from Amazonia. J. Mammal. 2021, 102, 69–89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Weksler, M. Phylogenetic Relationships of Oryzomyine Rodents (Muroidea: Sigmodontinae): Separate and combined analyses of morphological and molecular data. Bull. Am. Mus. Nat. Hist. 2006, 296, 1–149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Rocha, R.G.; Fonseca, C.; Zhou, Z.; Leite, Y.L.R.; Costa, L.P. Taxonomic and conservation status of the elusive Oecomys cleberi (Rodentia: Sigmodontinae) from Central Brazil. Mamm. Biol. 2012, 77, 414–419. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Suárez-Villota, E.Y.; Carmignotto, A.P.; Brandão, M.V.; Percequillo, A.R.; Silva, M.J.J. Systematics of the Genus Oecomys (Sigmodontinae: Oryzomyini): Molecular phylogenetic, cytogenetic and morphological approaches reveal cryptic species. Zool. J. Linn. Soc. 2018, 184, 182–210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Thomas, O. New Species of Oecomys and Marmosa from Amazonia. J. Nat. Hist. 1909, 3, 378–380. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Asfora, P.H.; Palma, A.R.T.; Astúa, D.; Geise, L. Distribution of Oecomys catherinae Thomas, 1909 in Northeastern Brazil with karyotypical and morphometrical notes. Biota Neotrop. 2011, 11, 415–424. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Feijó, A.; Nunes, H.; Langguth, A. Mamíferos da Reserva Biológica Guaribas, Paraíba, Brasil. Rev. Nord. Biol. 2016, 24, 57–74. [Google Scholar]
  12. Percequillo, A.R.; Bonvicino, C.R.; Araujo, A.C.; Bezerra, A.M.R.; Delciellos, A.C.; Machado, A.F.; Miranda, C.L.; Silva, C.R.; de Abreu, E.F., Jr.; Chiquito, E.A.; et al. Oecomys catherinae Thomas, 1909. Sistema de Avaliação do Risco de Extinção da Biodiversidade (SALVE); Instituto Chico Mendes de Conservação da Biodiversidade: Brasília, Brazil, 2024. Available online: https://salve.icmbio.gov.br (accessed on 26 June 2025).
  13. Gross, E.A.; Swenberg, J.A.; Fields, S.; Popp, J.A. Comparative morphometry of the nasal cavity in rats and mice. J. Anat. 1982, 135, 83. [Google Scholar]
  14. García, F.J.; Sánchez-González, E. Morfometría geométrica craneal en tres especies de roedores arborícolas neotropicales. Therya 2013, 4, 157–178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Pigliucci, M. Evolution of Phenotypic Plasticity: Where are we going now? Trends Ecol. Evol. 2005, 20, 481–486. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Myers, N.; Mittermeier, R.A.; Mittermeier, C.G.; Da Fonseca, G.A.; Kent, J. Biodiversity hotspots for conservation priorities. Nature 2000, 403, 853–858. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Oliveira-Filho, A.T.; Fontes, M.A.L. Patterns of floristic differentiation among Atlantic Forests in Southeastern Brazil and the influence of climate. Biotropica 2000, 32, 793–810. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Joly, C.A.; Metzger, J.P.; Tabarelli, M. Experiences from the Brazilian Atlantic Forest: Ecological findings and conservation initiatives. New Phytol. 2014, 204, 459–473. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Eiten, G. The cerrado vegetation of Brazil. Bot. Rev. 1972, 38, 201–341. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Alvares, C.A.; Stape, J.L.; Sentelhas, P.C.; Gonçalves, J.L.M.; Sparovek, G. Köppen’s climate classification map for Brazil. Meteorol. Z. 2013, 22, 711–728. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Voss, R.S. An Introduction to the Neotropical Muroid Rodent Genus Zygodontomys. Bull. Am. Mus. Nat. Hist. 1991, 210, 1–113. [Google Scholar]
  22. Voss, R.S. Systematics and Ecology of Ichthyomyine Rodents (Muroidea): Patterns of morphological evolution in a small adaptive radiation. Bull. Am. Mus. Nat. Hist. 1988, 188, 259–493. [Google Scholar]
  23. Carleton, M.D.; Musser, G.G. Systematic studies of Oryzomyine rodents (Muridae, Sigmodontinae)—Definition and distribution of Oligoryzomys vegetus (Bangs, 1902). Am. Mus. Novit. 1995, 108, 338–369. [Google Scholar]
  24. Anderson, M.J. A New Method for Non-Parametric Multivariate Analysis of Variance. Austral Ecol. 2001, 26, 32–46. [Google Scholar]
  25. Jombart, T.; Devillard, S.; Balloux, F. Discriminant Analysis of Principal Components. BMC Genet. 2010, 11, 94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Jombart, T.; Collins, C. A Tutorial for Discriminant Analysis of Principal Components (DAPC) Using Adegenet 2.0.0; Imperial College: London, UK, 2015. [Google Scholar]
  27. Legendre, P.; Anderson, M.J. Distance-Based Redundancy Analysis: Testing multispecies responses in multifactorial ecological experiments. Ecol. Monogr. 1999, 69, 1–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Neter, J.; Kutner, M.H.; Nachtsheim, C.J.; Wasserman, W. Applied Linear Statistical Models, 4th ed.; McGraw-Hill: New York, NY, USA, 1996. [Google Scholar]
  29. R Core Team. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing; R Foundation for Statistical Computing: Vienna, Austria, 2024. [Google Scholar]
  30. Jombart, T. adegenet: A R Package for the Multivariate Analysis of Genetic Markers. Bioinformatics 2008, 24, 1403–1405. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Oksanen, J.; Blanchet, F.G.; Kindt, R.; Legendre, P.; Minchin, P.R.; O’Hara, R.B.; Simpson, G.L.; Solymos, P.; Stevens, M.H.H.; Wagner, H. vegan: Community Ecology Package, R package version 2.6-4; R Foundation for Statistical Computing: Vienna, Austria, 2024. [Google Scholar]
  32. Zar, J.H. Biostatistical Analysis, 5th ed.; Pearson: London, UK, 2010. [Google Scholar]
  33. Carleton, M.D.; Emmons, L.H.; Musser, G.G. A new species of the rodent genus Oecomys (Cricetidae: Sigmodontinae: Oryzomyini) from eastern Bolivia, with emended definitions of O. concolor (Wagner) and O. mamorae (Thomas). Am. Mus. Novit. 2009, 3661, 1–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Rosa, C.C.; Flores, T.; Pieczarka, J.C.; Rossi, R.V.; Sampaio, M.I.C.; Rissino, J.D.; Nagamachi, C.Y. Genetic and morphological variability in South American rodent Oecomys (Sigmodontinae, Rodentia): Evidence for a complex of species. J. Genet. 2012, 91, 265–277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Samuels, J.X.; Van Valkenburgh, B. Skeletal Indicators of locomotor adaptations in living and extinct rodents. J. Morphol. 2008, 269, 1387–1411. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Lailvaux, S.P.; Irschick, D.J. A functional perspective on sexual selection: Insights and future prospects. Anim. Behav. 2006, 72, 263–273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Prado, J.R.; Percequillo, A.R.; Pirani, R.M.; Thomaz, A.T. Phenotypic and genomic differences between biomes of the South America marsh rat, Holochilus brasiliensis. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 2022, 135, 98–116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Stumpp, R.; Fuzessy, L.; Paglia, A.P. Environmental drivers acting on rodent rapid morphological change. J. Mamm. Evol. 2018, 25, 131–140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Pianka, E.R. Latitudinal gradients in species diversity: A review of concepts. Am. Nat. 1966, 100, 33–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Panteleev, P.A. On the character of geographical variation of rodents in Central Europe. Fol. Zool. 1985, 34, 33–41. [Google Scholar]
  41. Mittelbach, G.G.; Schemske, D.W.; Cornell, H.V.; Allen, A.P.; Brown, J.M.; Bush, M.B.; Harrison, S.P.; Hurlbert, A.H.; Knowlton, N.; Lessios, H.A.; et al. Evolution and the latitudinal diversity gradient: Speciation, extinction and biogeography. Ecol. Lett. 2007, 10, 315–331. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Pigot, A.L.; Trisos, C.H.; Tobias, J.A. Functional traits reveal the expansion and packing of ecological niche space underlying an elevational diversity gradient in passerine birds. Proc. R. Soc. B 2016, 283, 20152013. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Yom-Tov, Y.; Yom-Tov, S.; Jensen, T.S.; Baagøe, H. No recent temporal changes in body size of three Danish rodents. Acta Theriol. 2012, 57, 59–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Hillenius, W.J. The evolution of nasal turbinates and mammalian endothermy. Paleobiology 1992, 18, 17–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Amarillo-Suárez, A.R.; Stillwell, R.C.; Fox, C.W. Natural selection on body size is mediated by multiple interacting factors: A comparison of beetle populations varying naturally and experimentally in body size. Ecol. Evol. 2011, 1, 1–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Samuels, J.X. Cranial morphology and dietary habits of rodents. Zool. J. Linn. Soc. 2009, 156, 864–888. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Pinotti, B.T.; Naxara, L.; Pardini, R. Diet and food selection by small mammals in an old-growth Atlantic Forest of south-eastern Brazil. Stud. Neotrop. Fauna Environ. 2011, 46, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Losos, J.B. Convergence, adaptation, and constraint. Evolution 2011, 65, 1827–1840. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. McLean, B.S.; Bell, K.C.; Dunnum, J.L.; Abrahamson, B.; Colella, J.P.; Deardorff, E.R.; Weber, M.M.; Jones, A.K.B.; Salazar-Miralles, F.; Cook, J.A. Natural history collections-based research: Progress, promise, and best practices. J. Mammal. 2016, 97, 287–297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Cox, P.G.; Fagan, M.J.; Rayfield, E.J.; Jeffery, N. Finite element modelling of squirrel, guinea pig and rat skulls: Using geometric morphometrics to assess sensitivity. J. Anat. 2011, 219, 696–709. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Elmer, K.R.; Meyer, A. Adaptation in the age of ecological genomics: Insights from parallelism and convergence. Trends Ecol. Evol. 2011, 26, 298–306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Tingley, M.W.; Monahan, W.B.; Beissinger, S.R.; Moritz, C. Birds track their Grinnellian Niche through a century of climate change. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2009, 106, 19637–19643. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Geographical distribution of the 45 analyzed specimens of O. catherinae. Collection localities span eight Brazilian states. Cerrado biome: Distrito Federal: Brasília (9); Goiás: Anápolis (5), Aporé (3), Caiapônia (4), Caldas Novas (6), Luziânia (8), Niquelândia (7), Planaltina (10), Serranópolis (2); Mato Grosso do Sul: Dois Irmãos do Buriti (1); Tocantins: Dianópolis (11). Atlantic Forest biome: Bahia: Ilhéus (18); Minas Gerais: Pirapetinga (16); São Paulo: Ubatuba (12); Rio de Janeiro: Cachoeiras de Macacu (15), Casimiro de Abreu (17), Guapimirim (13), Sumidouro (14).
Figure 1. Geographical distribution of the 45 analyzed specimens of O. catherinae. Collection localities span eight Brazilian states. Cerrado biome: Distrito Federal: Brasília (9); Goiás: Anápolis (5), Aporé (3), Caiapônia (4), Caldas Novas (6), Luziânia (8), Niquelândia (7), Planaltina (10), Serranópolis (2); Mato Grosso do Sul: Dois Irmãos do Buriti (1); Tocantins: Dianópolis (11). Atlantic Forest biome: Bahia: Ilhéus (18); Minas Gerais: Pirapetinga (16); São Paulo: Ubatuba (12); Rio de Janeiro: Cachoeiras de Macacu (15), Casimiro de Abreu (17), Guapimirim (13), Sumidouro (14).
Animals 15 02200 g001
Figure 2. Molar dentition in O. catherinae showing stages of development and wear, from Classes 1 to 5, following [21] (from left to right, vouchers LBCE16562, CRB4023, CRB4025, MN33620, MN74360) considered in the age classification.
Figure 2. Molar dentition in O. catherinae showing stages of development and wear, from Classes 1 to 5, following [21] (from left to right, vouchers LBCE16562, CRB4023, CRB4025, MN33620, MN74360) considered in the age classification.
Animals 15 02200 g002
Figure 3. Skull of O. catherinae (MN75261) in dorsal view, following [21,22,23], showing cranial measurements: LN = length of nasals; LR = length of rostrum; BN = breadth of nasals; LIB = least interorbital breadth; ZB = zygomatic breadth; and BB = breadth of braincase.
Figure 3. Skull of O. catherinae (MN75261) in dorsal view, following [21,22,23], showing cranial measurements: LN = length of nasals; LR = length of rostrum; BN = breadth of nasals; LIB = least interorbital breadth; ZB = zygomatic breadth; and BB = breadth of braincase.
Animals 15 02200 g003
Figure 4. Skull of O. catherinae (MN75261) in ventral view, following [21,22,23], showing cranial measurements: BR = breadth of rostrum; BIF = breadth of incisive foramina; BBP = breadth across bony palate; BPL = bony palate length; and BOC = breadth of occipital condyles.
Figure 4. Skull of O. catherinae (MN75261) in ventral view, following [21,22,23], showing cranial measurements: BR = breadth of rostrum; BIF = breadth of incisive foramina; BBP = breadth across bony palate; BPL = bony palate length; and BOC = breadth of occipital condyles.
Animals 15 02200 g004
Figure 5. Skull of O. catherinae (MN75261) in lateral view, following [21,22,23], showing cranial measurements: LD = length of diastema; BZP = breadth of zygomatic plate; BH = braincase height; ONL = occipitonasal length; and CIL = condylo-incisive length.
Figure 5. Skull of O. catherinae (MN75261) in lateral view, following [21,22,23], showing cranial measurements: LD = length of diastema; BZP = breadth of zygomatic plate; BH = braincase height; ONL = occipitonasal length; and CIL = condylo-incisive length.
Animals 15 02200 g005
Figure 6. Mandible of O. catherinae (MN75261) in lateral view, following [21,22,23], showing measurements: LLD = lower length of diastema; CLLM = coronal length of lower molars; and MH = mandibular height.
Figure 6. Mandible of O. catherinae (MN75261) in lateral view, following [21,22,23], showing measurements: LLD = lower length of diastema; CLLM = coronal length of lower molars; and MH = mandibular height.
Animals 15 02200 g006
Figure 7. Upper dentition of O. catherinae (MN44805), following [21,22,23], showing measurements: WM1 = width of first upper molar (M1) and LM1—3 = coronal length of maxillary toothrow.
Figure 7. Upper dentition of O. catherinae (MN44805), following [21,22,23], showing measurements: WM1 = width of first upper molar (M1) and LM1—3 = coronal length of maxillary toothrow.
Animals 15 02200 g007
Figure 8. Graph of the discriminant analysis of principal components (DAPC) showing population groupings of O. catherinae specimens based on morphometric measurements across the Cerrado and Atlantic Forest biomes.
Figure 8. Graph of the discriminant analysis of principal components (DAPC) showing population groupings of O. catherinae specimens based on morphometric measurements across the Cerrado and Atlantic Forest biomes.
Animals 15 02200 g008
Figure 9. Contributions of morphometric variables to the separation of O. catherinae specimens between biomes (Cerrado and Atlantic Forest) in the discriminant analysis of principal components (DAPC).
Figure 9. Contributions of morphometric variables to the separation of O. catherinae specimens between biomes (Cerrado and Atlantic Forest) in the discriminant analysis of principal components (DAPC).
Animals 15 02200 g009
Figure 10. Relationship between the scores of the first canonical axis (CAP1) of the db-RDA analysis and the latitude of the specimen localities of O. catherinae. Each point represents an individual. The red line represents the trend curve adjusted by LOESS (Locally Estimated Scatterplot Smoothing), with a 95% confidence interval (shaded area). The increase in CAP1 scores with latitude suggests a morphological gradient in response to geographic variation.
Figure 10. Relationship between the scores of the first canonical axis (CAP1) of the db-RDA analysis and the latitude of the specimen localities of O. catherinae. Each point represents an individual. The red line represents the trend curve adjusted by LOESS (Locally Estimated Scatterplot Smoothing), with a 95% confidence interval (shaded area). The increase in CAP1 scores with latitude suggests a morphological gradient in response to geographic variation.
Animals 15 02200 g010
Table 1. Age classification of O. catherinae specimens based on third molar (M3) eruption stage and occlusal wear patterns, following [21].
Table 1. Age classification of O. catherinae specimens based on third molar (M3) eruption stage and occlusal wear patterns, following [21].
Age ClassificationDescription
Class 1 (juveniles)M3 incompletely erupted or unworn.
Class 2 (adults)M3 fully erupted exhibiting slight-to-moderate wear (some dentine exposed), but with the occlusal surface still tubercular (the paracone raised and prominent) not flat.
Class 3 (intermediate-stage adults)M3 well worn and the occlusal surface flat or concave; M1-2 tubercular (the major cusps all separate and prominent); anteroloph of M2 distinct, not fused with paracone.
Class 4 (advanced-stage adults)M3 flat or concave; M1-2 with cusps almost worn or quite flat but not below widest part of crown; anteroloph of M2 obliterated, fused with paracone.
Class 5 (senile adults)MI-3 all worn flat or concave, below widest part of crowns; most details of occlusal topography obliterated.
Table 2. Craniometric measurements of O. catherinae, including abbreviations (Abb), descriptions, and anatomical definitions of cranial and mandibular measurements [21,22,23]. All measurements are given in millimeters (mm).
Table 2. Craniometric measurements of O. catherinae, including abbreviations (Abb), descriptions, and anatomical definitions of cranial and mandibular measurements [21,22,23]. All measurements are given in millimeters (mm).
AbbMeasurementDescription
BHBraincase HeightBraincase height maximum vertical extent of the internal cranial region, from the base to the highest point of the skull.
BBBreadth of BraincaseMeasured at the plane dorsal to the squamosal roots of the zygomatic arches and ventral to the temporal ridges.
LIBLeast Interorbital BreadthThe least distance across the frontal bones between the orbital fossae.
BBPBreadth across Bony PalateThe greatest breadth across the basal part of the palate.
BIFBreadth of the Incisive ForaminaThe greatest inside breadth across both incisive foramina.
WM1Width of the First Upper Molar (M1)Coronal width of first upper molar.
BNBreadth of NasalsThe greatest breadth across both nasal bones.
BRBreadth of RostrumMeasured just inside the
anteroventral edge of the zygomatic plate.
LNLength of NasalsThe greatest length of either nasal bone.
LRLength of RostrumLongitudinal extent of the anterior or frontal part of the skull, including the facial bone region.
BZPBreadth of the Zygomatic PlateThe least distance between anterior and posterior edges of the zy-
gomatic plate.
BOCBreadth of the Occipital CondylesThe greatest breadth across the dorsal lobes of both occipital condyles.
LM1-3Coronal Length of Maxillary ToothrowMeasured along the alveolar margin from the anterior edge of M1 to the posterior edge of M3.
LDLength of DiastemaMeasured from the crown of the first maxillary molar to the exposed lesser curvature of the upper incisor on the same side.
BPLBony Palate LengthThe linear distance from the posterior margin of the incisive foramen to the anteriormost point of the posterior palatal border.
CLLMCoronal Length of Lower MolarsLinear length of the crown of the lower molars (M1–M3).
LLDLower Length of DiastemaLinear distance of the toothless gap between the incisors and molars in the lower dentition.
MHMandibular HeightMaximum vertical extent of the mandible.
CILCondylo-Incisive LengthMeasured from the exposed greater curvature of an upper incisor to the articular surface of the occipital condyle on the same side.
ONLOccipitonasal LengthGreatest length of skull, from the anteriormost projection of the nasal bones to the posteriormost projection of the occipital bone.
ZBZygomatic BreadthThe greatest breadth across the zygomatic processes of the squamosal bones.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Mata, P.S.d.; Cardoso, T.d.S.; Bonvicino, C.R.; Vilela, R.d.V. Phenotypic Variation Patterns in Oecomys catherinae (Rodentia: Sigmodontinae): Craniodental Morphometric Analysis and Its Relationship with Latitudinal Variation in the Atlantic Forest and Cerrado Biomes. Animals 2025, 15, 2200. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani15152200

AMA Style

Mata PSd, Cardoso TdS, Bonvicino CR, Vilela RdV. Phenotypic Variation Patterns in Oecomys catherinae (Rodentia: Sigmodontinae): Craniodental Morphometric Analysis and Its Relationship with Latitudinal Variation in the Atlantic Forest and Cerrado Biomes. Animals. 2025; 15(15):2200. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani15152200

Chicago/Turabian Style

Mata, Paola Santos da, Thiago dos Santos Cardoso, Cibele Rodrigues Bonvicino, and Roberto do Val Vilela. 2025. "Phenotypic Variation Patterns in Oecomys catherinae (Rodentia: Sigmodontinae): Craniodental Morphometric Analysis and Its Relationship with Latitudinal Variation in the Atlantic Forest and Cerrado Biomes" Animals 15, no. 15: 2200. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani15152200

APA Style

Mata, P. S. d., Cardoso, T. d. S., Bonvicino, C. R., & Vilela, R. d. V. (2025). Phenotypic Variation Patterns in Oecomys catherinae (Rodentia: Sigmodontinae): Craniodental Morphometric Analysis and Its Relationship with Latitudinal Variation in the Atlantic Forest and Cerrado Biomes. Animals, 15(15), 2200. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani15152200

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop