Next Article in Journal
Global Hotspots of Whale–Ship Collision Risk: A Multi-Species Framework Integrating Critical Habitat Zonation and Shipping Pressure for Conservation Prioritization
Next Article in Special Issue
Natural Product-Induced Modulation of Androstenone Metabolism in Porcine Hepatocytes
Previous Article in Journal
Neutral Sodium Humate Modulates Growth, Slaughter Traits, Antioxidant Status, and Gut Health in Yellow-Feathered Broilers
Previous Article in Special Issue
Impacts of 360 mg/kg Niacinamide Supplementation in Low-Protein Diets on Energy and Nitrogen Metabolism and Intestinal Microbiota in Growing–Finishing Pigs
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Genetic Variability of Loci Affecting Meat Quality and Production in Nero Siciliano Pig Breed

Dipartimento di Agricoltura, Alimentazione e Ambiente, University of Catania, 95123 Catania, Italy
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Animals 2025, 15(14), 2143; https://doi.org/10.3390/ani15142143
Submission received: 14 June 2025 / Revised: 9 July 2025 / Accepted: 18 July 2025 / Published: 19 July 2025
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Impact of Genetics and Feeding on Growth Performance of Pigs)

Simple Summary

Nero Siciliano is a native pig breed mainly reared in an open-air system in the mountainous area of north-eastern Sicily. Despite its economic importance and the high-quality meat products, the breed is currently endangered. As part of a broader project to characterize and support the conservation of this breed, the genetic variability of four candidate genes involved in back fat deposition and growth rate was evaluated to provide useful information for the promotion of Nero Siciliano meat products. By analyzing a representative sample of pigs reared in the original breeding area, high frequencies of gene polymorphisms linked to different growth rates and fat deposition were detected. A deleterious RYR1 g.1843T allele to cause malignant hyperthermia and pale, soft, exudative meat was detected in seven heterozygous pigs. These results highlight the importance of regular genetic monitoring to promote beneficial traits and eradicate harmful variants, preserving local producers and this endangered breed.

Abstract

Nero Siciliano (NS) is an autochthonous pig breed reared in northeastern Sicily; despite its high-quality meat products, NS is currently endangered. This study aimed to evaluate the genetic variability at nine loci within candidate genes for meat traits—Melanocortin 4 Receptor (MC4R), Ryanodine Receptor 1 (RYR1), Class 3 Phosphoinositide 3-Kinase (PIK3C3) and Leptin (LEP)—to provide useful information for preservation and exploitation of the NS pig breed. Distribution of the genetic variants was assessed in a representative sample of 87 pigs (18 boars and 69 sows) collected in nine farms located in the original breeding area. Genotypes have been determined using PCR-RFLP and Sanger sequencing. Alleles linked to different growth rates and back fat deposition showed high frequencies (MC4R c.175C—0.93; LEP g.3469T—0.91) in the whole sample. Deviations from Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium and different allele distribution in boars and sows were observed. The RYR1 g.1843T allele, associated with Malignant Hyperthermia and Pale Soft Exudative meat defect, was reported in seven heterozygote pigs (q = 0.04) with one farm exhibiting a frequency of 0.29. Our results suggest the need for continuous monitoring of the genetic variants in NS both to maintain high meat quality and eradicate the RYR1 g.1843T allele.

1. Introduction

The Nero Siciliano (NS) is an ancient native black pig breed that originated in Sicily and is mainly reared in the mountainous Nebrodi area in the north-east of the island. Pig breeding in Sicily dates back to the Greek and Carthaginian periods, and meat products derived from the black pigs of Sicily (the ancestors of the current NS breed) were already known in Rome by the second century BC [1].
Nowadays, most NS pigs are raised “en plein air” in the Nebrodi Nature Park, in beech and oak forests enclosed by fences. These hardy pigs are well adapted to harsh environmental conditions and are valued for their good reproductive performance, disease resistance and meat production. They therefore represent an important resource for the local economy [2,3]. The high quality of NS meat products results from several factors, including genetics, diet and nutrition, environment, and traditional techniques that give cured meats their unique flavor and taste. By exploiting marginal areas and feeding on natural food resources rich in aromatic and antioxidant compounds, as well as monounsaturated fatty acids, the pigs grow slowly but produce tasty meat and fat [4,5], which is used to produce high-quality fresh meat that is mainly transformed into cured hams and other cured meats.
Due to the high added value recognized to its products, a genetic authentication and traceability protocol using a set of SNP markers has been developed for the economic enhancement of Nero Siciliano-only products [6]. Despite its economic and ecological importance and its well-appreciated meat products, the NS is endangered and is officially included in the national conservation programme managed by the Italian Pig Breeders Association (ANAS). Therefore, the FAO DAD-IS system classified the breed as “at risk”, with a local risk status of “endangered maintained”. Currently, the population numbers 4937 pigs, and the census shows a decreasing trend, with 136 boars and 505 breeding sows (last updated on 7 October 2024).
Genetic information on Italian autochthonous pig breeds is still limited. In these local breeds, which are poorly genetically managed and not included in selection and genetic improvement programs, investigating polymorphisms at relevant candidate loci associated with productive traits may provide helpful insights, especially for characterizing breeding stock employed in natural on-farm mating. Taking structural and scientific action to enhance knowledge of genetic variability is essential to promote production performance and genetic improvement of the NS pig breed, to preserve this valuable resource and meet the challenges of the market, climate change and production sustainability. Research activities carried out under the REDSUS project aimed at the “Improvement of the profitability of the Nebrodi Nero Siciliano Pig breeding. Actions on animals and products in respect of animal welfare and environmental sustainability” have focused on the genetic characterization of breeding stock for loci known to influence meat production and quality. Genetic characterization of livestock populations is essential for developing strategies and techniques that protect local breeds at risk and enable more defined and effective selection programs. Furthermore, analyzing intra-breed variability is essential for preserving this genetic resource, its breeding system, and traditional products [7,8].
In the “en plein air” breeding system, the evaluation of growth potential is limited due to restricted information regarding feed intake and nutritional value of feed. Although the productive performance of NS has been little investigated and only a few studies have collected data on meat production in an extensive system [9,10], it is well known that the average daily weight gain and fat deposition in NS are, respectively, much lower and much higher than in modern, selected breeds [11]. These traits can be genetically enhanced. Some candidate loci have been identified in Sus scrofa for meat production and body composition; however, these genes have been scarcely investigated in the NS breed.
The aim of this study is to evaluate the genetic variability of some candidate genes involved in feed intake, growth rate, fattening and in back fat deposition—Melanocortin-4 Receptor (MC4R), Ryanodine Receptor 1 (RYR1)-Alothane, Class 3 Phosphoinositide 3-Kinase (PIK3C3), and Leptin (LEP)—in order to provide useful information for maintaining and enhancing the quality and production of NS pork as a valuable tool for its conservation and economic self-sustainability.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Animal Sampling and DNA Extraction

A representative sample of 87 NS pigs (18 boars and 69 sows) was collected from 9 farms (8–14 pigs per farm) in the Nebrodi area, the breed’s original and most traditional breeding area. Only minimally related animals were selected from each farm, taking into account the known genealogical records. The sex ratio reflects that determined in the whole NS population. Peripheral blood was collected in EDTA vacutainer tubes by authorized veterinarians as part of the National Animal Health Service’s routine sanitary screening, in accordance with general recommendations for animal welfare. All efforts were made to minimize animal suffering in line with the European Council’s recommendations on animal care (Directive 2010/63/EU). Genomic DNA was extracted from blood using DNeasy Blood and Tissue Kits for DNA isolation (Qiagen, MD, USA). The quality and concentration of the DNA were quantified using a NanoDrop 1000 spectrophotometer (NanoDrop Technologies, Wilmington, DE, USA).

2.2. Genetic Characterization

Nine loci in four candidate genes (MC4R, RYR1-Alothane, LEP, PIK3C3) were genotyped using different PCR-RFLP methods and DNA sequencing. Primers were synthesized from Eurofins Genomics (Ebersberg, Germany). The list of analyzed genes and loci, the methods, and the references are reported in Table 1. Genotypes at MC4R c.-135 C>T and c.707 G>A were analyzed by direct Sanger sequencing. The remaining seven loci were characterized by the PCR-RFLP method, and in order to confirm the digestion results, a subset of six to nine samples with different genotypes for each locus was sequenced. The target DNA sequence for each locus was amplified starting from 50 ng/µL of genomic DNA in a total reaction volume of 50 µL using the MiniAmp Plus thermal cycler (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA). The PCR products were purified using Exo-SAP digestion and then dideoxy sequencing was performed using the BigDye™ Terminator v3.1 Cycle Sequencing Kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc., Waltham, MA, USA). Sequencing reactions were performed bidirectionally on an Applied Biosystems 3130 genetic analyzer (Applied Biosystem, Foster City, CA, USA). Chromatograms were visualized using BioEdit software version 7.2.5 (Tom Hall, Ibis Biosciences, Carlsbad, CA, USA), then aligned and compared with the respective reference sequences (GenBank Acc. Num. FJ357500.1, M91451.1, AF026976, U66254.1, AY823302.1) using MEGA X v.11 [12].

2.3. Statistical Analysis

Departure from Hardy–Weinberg genetic equilibrium was evaluated using the χ2 test [13]. The software PHASE ver. 2.1, which implements a Bayesian statistical method, was used to reconstruct haplotypes at the MC4R and LEP loci from allelic frequencies within each gene in each population [14]. The threshold frequency for determining haplotypes was set to 1%. The main descriptive population statistics (Ho, He, Fis and Shannon index) were estimated using “GenAlEx 6.51b2” software version 6.5 [13].
Table 1. List of the genes and polymorphic sites analyzed.
Table 1. List of the genes and polymorphic sites analyzed.
GeneAcc. Num.SiteSNP AminoAcidsPrimers Sequence (5′-3′)Amplicon (bp)MethodRef
MC4RFJ357500.15′
UTR
−780 C>G-GTGGCGAAGGTCACAATGG
AGTGGCTCCTCCTCTGCTT
640PCR-RFLP[15]
c.135 C>T-TCTTCTCCCAATAGCACAGC
GGAAACGCTCACCAGCATA
536Sequencing[15]
Ex 1c.175 C>T
rs81221060
p.Leu59LeuCAGGTCAGAGGGGATCTCAA
GTGCAGACTGCCCAGATACA
568PCR-RFLP [15]
c.707G>A
rs81221061
p.Arg236HisTCGATTGCAGTGGACAGGTA
GAAAATGCTGTTGTGAAGCA
663Sequencing[15]
c.1426G>A
rs81219178
p.Asp298AsnPCR-RFLP[15]
RYR1M91451.1Ex 17c.1843C>T
rs706913914
p.Arg615CysGTGCTGGATGTCCTGTGTTCCCT CTGGTGACATAGTTGATGAGGTTTG134PCR-RFLP[16]
LEPAF0269763′
UTR
g.2728G>A
rs3475337814
-CCCTGCTTGCACTTGGTAGC
CTGCCACACGAGTCTTGCTC
658PCR-RFLP[17]
U66254.1Ex 2c.3469 T>C
rs45431504
p.Leu72LeuAACAGAGGGTCACCGGTTTG
TTTGGAAGAGCAGCTTAGCG
486PCR-RFLP[18]
PIK3C3AY823302.1Ex 24c.2604 C>T
rs81211045
p.His826HisATTTCGTCTAGACCTGTCCG
TGAATCTGTTCTACCACCGC
102PCR-RFLP[19]

3. Results and Discussion

All the analyzed loci were polymorphic in our sample, except for one (MC4R c.135 C>T). The results of genetic characterization are presented in Table 2 and Table 3 for the entire population and the subpopulations of boars and sows.
The polymorphisms here analyzed by PCR-RFLP (Table 1) were confirmed by sequencing 6–9 samples with different genotypes. The sequences did not reveal any new mutations.

3.1. Genetic Variation at MC4R Gene

The MC4R gene encodes the G-protein-coupled melanocortin-4 receptor, which plays an important role in controlling feed intake, energy balance, and fatness in mammals by binding to its ligands, such as the α-melanocyte-stimulating hormone (α-MSH) and the agouti-related protein (AgRP) [20,21]. The receptor is mainly expressed in cells of the central nervous system and has been reported to act as a pivotal mediator of leptin, being involved in the leptin feedback control of food intake, body weight, and energy homeostasis [19]. In pigs, the MC4R gene has been mapped on chromosome SSC1 q22-q27 [22], a region encompassing the largest number of economically important QTL in pigs [23,24]. The MC4R locus has therefore been reported to be associated with many economic traits, such as backfat, food intake and daily weight gain. The gene consists of a large single exon spanning 999 kb, and several SNPs, including two missense substitutions, have been identified in the coding region.
In this study, five SNPs have been characterized in the MC4R gene (Table 1) located in the 5′UTR region and in exon I. Polymorphisms in the 5′UTR region can alter gene expression by changing transcription factor binding sites. Considering this, the −780 C>G locus was investigated in Nero Siciliano pigs. This locus exhibited only two genotypes with the balanced allele frequencies approaching 50%. However, this locus is not in genetic balance within the population, or within the subpopulations of boars and sows, due to a significant excess of heterozygotes (Table 2 and Table S1). In the literature, the −780 C allele has been associated with increased dorsal and lumbar lard thickness and reduced growth rate [15].
A 536 bp fragment of the MC4R gene was sequenced, covering part of the 5′ UTR and part of the coding sequence (Acc. Num FJ357500.1). The site described as c.135 C>T by Fan et al. [15], but not annotated as a SNP in the Ensembl dataset, was found to be monomorphic for the T allele in our sample of NS. In a study carried out on Italian Large White pigs, the c.135 C>T SNP occurred at a very low minor-allele frequency and was, therefore, excluded from subsequent association tests [25]. In our sample of 87 NS pigs, direct sequencing revealed four heterozygous variants (in two sows): three of these map to known Ensembl entries—g.1181 T>C (rs81221059), g.1201 T>G (rs330973696), and g.1490 C>T (rs81221060)—and one appears to be novel—g.1311 G>A (Figure S1). Except for the synonymous SNP at position g.1490 in the coding region, all other variants are located in the 5′ UTR region.
The SNP c.175C>T is a synonymous mutation p.Leu59Leu. The polymorphism observed at this locus in NS is quite interesting. The C allele and the CC genotype are predominant in the population, but the locus is not in Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium (Table 2). Furthermore, different allelic and genotypic distributions have been observed in sows and boars (Table 2); in fact, the C allele, identified in the ISU Berkshire×Yorkshire resource population by [15] as potentially associated with faster growth and reduced back-fat thickness, is more frequent in sows than in boars.
Missense mutations can modify the protein’s structure and function. In pigs, the MC4R c.707 G>A SNP results in an amino acid substitution in the G-protein sequence at position 236, and this variation is, therefore, commonly known as p.Arg236His. A balanced polymorphism is present in Nero Siciliano at this locus, with the allele G being the major one (0.63) (Table 2). In the literature, the G allele (Arg236) has been associated with major body weight gain and reduced back fat thickness than the A allele [15].
The SNP MC4R c.1426 G>A determines a substitution Asp298Asn in the seventh transmembrane domain of the G protein receptor, with the Asp residue well preserved in MCRs and the Asn residue highly conserved in most other G-protein coupled receptors (GPCRs) [22]. As the highly conserved residues play important roles in ligand binding or intracellular signaling [26], this variant may have distinct functional capabilities in the regulation of food intake and body weight, and it is the most studied MC4R locus in several pig breeds. Allele A, variant (p. 298Asn), has been suggested to be associated with higher growth rate and lower fatness; however, the effect of this substitution on the function of the receptor is still controversial, limiting its use in practical pig breeding [15].
In NS, this polymorphism is fairly balanced, with the G allele (p.298Asp) and the heterozygous genotype having frequencies close to 50% (0.55 and 0.54, respectively) in the population; however, interestingly, the A allele (298Asn) is the most common in boars (0.61), in contrast to the situation in sows (0.41), suggesting sex-specific selection for faster weight gain in males at this locus. Muñoz et al. [27] found that the A allele showed intermediate frequencies (0.30–0.70) in several other Italian and European local breeds (Apulo-Calabrese, Cinta Senese, Gascon, Krškopolje, and both Lithuanian breeds, Moravka, and Sarda). Recently, Valluzzi et al. [28] reported that allele G and genotype GG were largely predominant in Nero Lucano, another rustic Italian local population of black-coated pigs reared in semi-extensive systems. In the literature, Hirose et al. [29] reported allele A and homozygous genotype AA were the most common in a genetically improved Japanese Duroc population selected for faster growth rate, backfat thickness (BFT) and intramuscular fat content (IMF) in the loin. These results may reflect selective pressure for these productive traits in improved breeds. Indeed, allele A (Asn 298) was found to be associated with increasing daily gain, higher lean meat percentage and reduced backfat thickness across different breeds in Lithuanian White pigs as well as in both Italian Duroc and Large White populations [30,31].
According to Van den Broeke et al. [32], the MC4R c.1426G>A locus affected meat production and quality. Pigs with the AA genotype showed a lower dressing percentage, ham width and muscle thickness, but thicker fat, resulting in a lower lean meat percentage compared to GG pigs. In addition, interestingly, AA boars showed significantly higher levels of the boar taint compounds androstenone, skatole, and indole in their fat when compared to GG boars, but overall, these increases did not affect the sensory analysis of the meat and fat samples. Recently, Zhang et al. [33] investigated the functional impact of the substitution p.Asp298Asn, revealing that the Asn298 receptor exhibits reduced basal activity and lower surface expression of MC4R compared to Asp298. This suggests that it could impact the satiety signal and energy balance and serve as a valuable selection marker in pig breeding programs.

3.2. Genetic Variation at RYR1, LEP and PIK3C3 Genes

The Ryanodine Receptor1 (RYR1) gene, located on porcine chromosome 6 (SSC6q12) [34], encodes the tetrameric Ca2+ release channel of the skeletal muscle sarcoplasmic reticulum. A single-base mutation on the RYR1 g.1843 C>T gene causes an amino acid substitution (Arg615Cys) resulting in uncontrolled Ca2+ release and subsequent muscle hypermetabolism [35]. The mutation is associated with both Malignant Hyperthermia (MH) and the inherited myopathy and meat defect known as PSE (Pale Soft Exudative). Historically, this polymorphism is more common in the Pietrain breed, known for its particularly high lean meat content and efficient feed conversion ratio [36]. The RYR1 g.1843 T allele was introduced into commercial pig breeds through the Pietrain boars, often used in selection programs aiming to reduce back fat and to increase lean yield. The defective allele RYR1 T alters the membrane properties of the sarcoplasmic-reticulum membrane in skeletal muscle fibers, leading to increased release of calcium ions in response to various stressors [37]. In pigs carrying the defective allele RYR1 T, Fiedler et al. [38] reported increased mean fiber type diameters and glycolytic metabolic potential, a more rapid post-mortem pH decline, and higher drop loss. The wild-type genotype CC showed a statistically significant effect on the average daily gain and backfat thickness, probably due to greater fatness and lower lean meat content [37].
In NS, the RYR1 g.1843 C>T locus exhibits very low variability and conforms to Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium. The T allele was identified only in seven heterozygous pigs (six sows and one boar) across three farms, although one farm showed a quite allele frequency (0.29). This allele, which is associated with the PSE, Porcine Stress Syndrome (PSS) and Malignant Hyperthermia (MH) [39], can be a cause of major economic losses. The Italian Pig Breeders Association (ANAS) chose to eradicate it from the Italian breeds, mainly used to produce high-quality branded products, such as “Suino Mediterraneo” and “Gran Suino Padano”, because of the deleterious effects of the mutation on meat quality, particularly in cured products. Local breeds, not crossed with cosmopolitan breeds and especially with the Pietrain, are expected to be free from this mutation, as reported for several Mediterranean local breeds [40,41,42], including Mora Romagnola [27] and Nero Lucano [28]. Other authors reported the presence of the Halothane gene at low frequency in most of the Italian breeds, including Nero Siciliano [16,27] Casertana, Apilo-Calabrese, Sarda [27] and Cinta Senese [27,43]. In contrast, high frequencies were found in some other Mediterranean breeds, probably due to historical crossbreeding with Pietrain and Landrace breeds [42,44]. In NS, the presence of the RYR1 g.1843T allele, which is detrimental to meat quality and animal welfare, poses a threat to the breed and highlights the need for careful control of matings.
The LEP gene encodes the protein hormone leptin, an adipocytokine secreted mainly by white adipose tissue. This hormone plays a central role in the control of feeding, energy balance and metabolism [45]. It acts on satiety centers in the hypothalamus, which control feed intake, energy balance, body weight, and metabolism through physiological and endocrine mechanisms. In pigs, the LEP gene has been mapped to chromosome SSC18q13-q21 [46,47] and consists of three exons: the first is a short untranslated sequence, while the second and third are the coding sequence [48]. Two SNPs have been characterized in NS: g.2728 G>A, located in 3′UTR region, and c.3469 T>C, a synonymous nucleotide substitution identified in the second exon [18,49].
In the NS population, the locus g.2728 G>A shows all three genotypes and a significant deviation of the genotype frequencies from the expected distribution at equilibrium (Table 2), with allele G and genotype AG being the most frequent. The c.3469 T>C transition showed only two genotypes, in our sample of NS, with the T allele and TT genotypes largely predominant in the population, particularly among boars rather than in sows (Table 3). In the literature, many association analyses showed that this polymorphism is significantly associated with production traits such as average daily weight gain [17,18,50]. Kennes et al. [17] found higher average daily gain (ADG) in TT pigs versus CT heterozygotes; de Oliveira Peixoto et al. [50] confirmed that TT animals had the highest body weights throughout the early growth period in an F2 Duroc × Landrace cross, whereas CT heterozygotes higher average daily gain and a more efficient feed conversion during the later fattening period; in contrast Chao et al. [18] reported that the C allele predominates in Western commercial breeds being significantly associated with improved growth performance. This contradictory evidence has limited the use of this marker in practical pig breeding so far.
The phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase catalytic subunit type 3 (PIK3C3) gene encodes for a protein, phosphoinositide 3-kinase, class 3, which is essential for mammalian development because of its role in performing many specific cellular functions as well as the metabolic activity of insulin. In addition, the gene is mapped to a QTL region on chromosome 6q22-23 [51], so it appears to be a functional and also a positional candidate gene related to the fat deposition trait in domestic pigs. In the literature, the SNP g.2604 C>T, located in exon 24, has been reported to be associated with various production traits; the C allele increased average daily gain, backfat thickness and intramuscular fat in Duroc pigs [52] and body weight and backfat in Landrace x Korean native crosses [19].
In our sample of NS, this SNP showed two genotypes, a strong predominance of the C allele together with a significant excess of heterozygotes in the population (Table 2). The C/T SNP of porcine PIK3C3 could be utilized as a possible genetic marker to select swine that possess a low back fat thickness and carcass fat content at the slaughter weight [19]. The locus is not in Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium in the population or in both male and female subpopulations (Table 3). Noteworthy is the different distribution of alleles and genotypes in the two subpopulations, which could be the result of different selective pressures towards higher growth rate and lower fat deposition in boars and sows. Recently, a high level of genetic variability with heterozygosity of 0.5 has been reported in Nero Lucano, another local population in Southern Italy [28].

3.3. Haplotypes at MC4R, LEP and Genetic Diversity Parameters in Nero Siciliano

In NS, the MC4R gene resulted quite polymorphic with four out of five variable loci. In this representative sample of the breed, a total of 16 haplotypes with frequencies greater than 1% were inferred within the MC4R gene (Table S1). Haplotype frequencies ranged from 0.156 to 0.005. The highest frequency was recorded by the CTCGG haplotype (0.156 ± 0.017), followed by CTCGA (0.148 ± 0.017). The first four haplotypes accounted for more than 50% of the total frequency (0.595).
All the possible haplotypes were identified within LEP gene but among these, GT (0.472) and AT (0.436), were by far the most frequent ones and together accounted for more than 90% of the total frequency (0.91) in this breed (Table S1). In contrast, Valluzzi et al. [28] reported all four possible haplotypes in partial linkage disequilibrium in the Nero Lucano pig.
The genetic diversity parameters obtained for each segregating marker are shown in Table 4. The values of observed heterozygosity (Ho) and expected heterozygosity (He) per locus ranged from 0.080 to 0.977 and from 0.077 to 0.500, respectively, with overall values of 0.450 ± 0.1250 for Ho and 0.314 ± 0.071 for He. Due to an excess of heterozygotes at some loci, MC4R (−780 C>G), LEP (g.2728G>A), and PIK3C3 (c.2604 C>T), Fis values were often negative, ranging from −0.955 to 0.284, with a mean of −0.296 ± 0.142. These values indicate recent migration, crossbreeding or outbreeding events. Accidental hybridisation with wild boars could also explain these values. Indeed, Genualdo et al. [53] have reported hybrids resulting from occasional crosses with wild pigs, which are found in the Nebrodi Mountains, where NS pigs are raised in “en plein air” and extensive systems. A subsequent study, analysing sperm DNA integrity, sperm meiotic segregation, and nuclear spatial organisation in a NS boar–pig hybrid, revealed that the hybrid had a high proportion (64%) of motile spermatozoa with regular chromosome composition and specific spatial distribution [54]. These studies confirmed that boar–pig hybrids pose a threat to the conservation of indigenous pig breeds reared in extensive systems.
The breed genetic diversity parameters observed in NS are higher than those recorded in 20 local European pig breeds [27]. The mean number of alleles (Na = 1.889), the mean number of effective alleles (Ne = 1.582) per locus and the Shannon index (I = 0.460) confirm a good level of genetic diversity at the SNP candidate loci analyzed. These data support the good sampling strategies carried out in the most representative farms of the traditional breeding area of these pigs.

4. Conclusions

The Nero Siciliano pig, reared “en plein air” in the Nebrodi mountains, is an endangered breed appreciated for its meat and cured meats. These high-quality food products represent important resources for the exploitation and conservation of this endangered breed. They are the result of several components, including the breed’s genetics. This study provides a detailed analysis of genetic variant distributions at selected candidate genes associated with growth and fattening in a representative sample of Nero Siciliano pigs. Molecular analysis and DNA sequencing revealed a new SNP in MC4R 5′UTR. Furthermore, some alleles, linked to different growth rate and back fat deposition showed high frequencies in the whole sample (MC4R c.175C—0.93; LEP g.3469T—0.91). Deviations from genetic balance and different distributions in boars and sows were also observed at some loci (MC4R −780 C>G; MC4R c.175 C>T; LEP g.2728 G>A; PIK3C3 g.2604 C>T). The presence of the RYR1 g.1843T allele, which is associated with MH and PSE, was detected in three farms and was found at a rather high frequency (0.29) in one of them. Our results confirm substantial genetic variability in the NS breed and suggest the importance of continuous genetic monitoring in order to plan proper breeding strategies. Particular attention should be given to the eradication of the RYR1 g.1843T allele, which is detrimental to meat quality and animal welfare and causes significant economic losses.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/ani15142143/s1, Figure S1: Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms observed in the 5’UTR and in Exon I of the MC4R gene in Nero Siciliano pigs. The SNP g.1181 T>C (rs81221059), g.1201 T>G (rs330973696), and g.1490 C>T (rs81221060) map to known Ensembl entries, whereas g.1311 G>A appears to be novel; Table S1: Haplotype distribution at the MC4R and LEP genes in Nero Siciliano pigs.

Author Contributions

Conceived and designed the experiments, S.T. and S.B.; methodology, S.T., M.C. and A.A.; analyzed the data, S.T. and M.C.; writing—original draft preparation, S.T., M.C. and A.C.; writing—review and editing, G.C. and S.B.; supervision, S.B. and D.M. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the projects “REDSUS” PSR Sicilia 14/20–Operazione 16.1b, CUP G46D20000130009; “Gen.Al.Tec.”; Linea 1—PIAno di inCEntivi per la RIcerca di Ateneo 2024/2026; P.I. Andrea Criscione.

Institutional Review Board Statement

This study was conducted using only blood samples taken by authorised Italian health service veterinarians for compulsory sanitary screening. According to the Italian law, no approval was required for blood samples collected by veterinarians during routinary visits on farm.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Data are available from the corresponding author.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare they do not have any conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Chicoli, N. Riproduzione, Allevamento e Miglioramento Degli Animali Domestici in Sicilia; Lorsnaider, G., Ed.; Stamperia di Giovanni Lorsnaider: Palermo, Italy, 1870. [Google Scholar]
  2. Guastella, A.M.; Criscione, A.; Marletta, D.; Zuccaro, A.; Chies, L.; Bordonaro, S. Molecular characterization and genetic structure of the Nero Siciliano pig breed. Genet. Mol. Biol. 2010, 33, 650–656. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Zumbo, A.; Sutera, A.M.; Tardiolo, G.; D’Alessandro, E. Sicilian black pig: An overview. Animals 2020, 10, 2326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Pugliese, C.; Madonia, G.; Chiofalo, V.; Margiotta, S.; Acciaioli, A.; Gandini, G. Comparison of the performances of Nero Siciliano pigs reared indoors and outdoors. 1. Growth and carcass composition. Meat Sci. 2003, 65, 825–831. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Pugliese, C.; Sirtori, F.; D’Adorante, S.; Parenti, S.; Rey, A.; Lopez-Bote, C.; Franci, O. Effect of pasture in oak and chestnut groves on chemical and sensorial traits of cured lard of Cinta Senese pigs. Ital. J. Anim. Sci. 2016, 8, 131–142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Moretti, R.; Criscione, A.; Turri, F.; Bordonaro, S.; Marletta, D.; Castiglioni, B.; Chessa, S. A 20-SNP Panel as a Tool for Genetic Authentication and Traceability of Pig Breeds. Animals 2022, 12, 1335. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Bordonaro, S.; Chessari, G.; Mastrangelo, S.; Senczuk, G.; Chessa, S.; Castiglioni, B.; Tumino, S.; Marletta, D.; Criscione, A. Genome-wide population structure, homozygosity, and heterozygosity patterns of Nero Siciliano pig in the framework of Italian and cosmopolitan breeds. Anim. Genet. 2023, 54, 591–605. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. D’Alessandro, E.; Sottile, G.; Sardina, M.T.; Criscione, A.; Bordonaro, S.; Sutera, A.M.; Zumbo, A.; Portolano, B.; Mastrangelo, S. Genome-wide analyses reveal the regions involved in the phenotypic diversity in Sicilian pigs. Anim. Genet. 2020, 51, 101–105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Pugliese, C.; Calagna, G.; Chiofalo, V.; Moretti, V.M.; Margiotta, S.; Franci, O.; Gandini, G. Comparison of the performances of Nero Siciliano pigs reared indoors and outdoors: 2. Joints composition, meat and fat traits. Meat Sci. 2004, 68, 523–528. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Liotta, L.; Chiofalo, B.; Zumbo, A.; Chiofalo, V. Effects of different nutritional levels on Nero Siciliano pig performance. Ital. J. Anim. Sci. 2010, 4, 470–472. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Bozzi, R.; Gallo, M.; Geraci, C.; Fontanesi, L.; Batorek-Lukač, N. Nero Siciliano Pig in European Local Pig Breeds-Diversity and Performance. A Study of Project Treasure; IntechOpen: Rijeka, Croatia, 2019; ISBN 978-1-78985-408-4. [Google Scholar]
  12. Tamura, K.; Stecher, G.; Kumar, S. MEGA11: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis Version 11. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2021, 38, 3022–3027. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Peakall, R.O.D.; Smouse, P.E. GenAlEx 6: Genetic analysis in Excel. Population genetic software for teaching and research. Mol. Ecol. Notes 2006, 6, 288–295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Stephens, M.; Smith, N.J.; Donnelly, P. A new statistical method for haplotype reconstruction from population data. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 2001, 68, 978–989. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Fan, B.; Onteru, S.K.; Plastow, G.S.; Rothschild, M.F. Detailed characterization of the porcine MC4R gene in relation to fatness and growth. Anim. Genet. 2009, 40, 401–409. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Russo, V.; Fontanesi, L.; Davoli, R.; Chiofalo, L.; Liotta, L.; Zumbo, A. Analysis of single nucleotide polymorphisms in major and candidate genes for production traits in Nero Siciliano pig breed. Ital. J. Anim. Sci. 2016, 3, 19–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Kennes, Y.M.; Murphy, B.D.; Pothier, F.; Palin, M.F. Characterization of swine leptin (LEP) polymorphisms and their association with production traits. Anim. Genet. 2001, 32, 215–218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Chao, Z.; Wang, F.; Deng, C.-Y.; Wei, L.-M.; Sun, R.-P.; Liu, H.-L.; Liu, Q.-W.; Zheng, X.-L. Distribution and linkage disequilibrium analysis of polymorphisms of MC4R, LEP, H-FABP genes in the different populations of pigs, associated with economic traits in DIV2 line. Mol. Biol. Rep. 2012, 39, 6329–6335. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Kim, J.H.; Choi, B.H.; Lim, H.T.; Park, E.W.; Lee, S.H.; Seo, B.Y.; Cho, I.C.; Lee, J.G.; Oh, S.J.; Jeon, J.T. Characterization of Phosphoinositide-3-kinase, Class 3 (PIK3C3) Gene and Association Tests with Quantitative Traits in Pigs. Asian Australas. Assoc. Anim. Prod. Soc. 2005, 18, 1701–1707. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Krude, H.; Biebermann, H.; Luck, W.; Horn, R.; Brabant, G.; Grüters, A. Severe early-onset obesity, adrenal insufficiency and red hair pigmentation caused by POMC mutations in humans. Nat. Genet. 1998, 19, 155–157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Cone, R.D. Anatomy and regulation of the central melanocortin system. Nat. Neurosci. 2005, 8, 571–578. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Kim, K.S.; Larsen, N.; Short, T.; Plastow, G.; Rothschild, M.F. A missense variant of the porcine melanocortin-4 receptor (MC4R) gene is associated with fatness, growth, and feed intake traits. Mamm. Genome 2000, 11, 131–135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Kim, K.S.; Larsen, N.J.; Rothschild, M.F. Rapid communication: Linkage and physical mapping of the porcine melanocortin-4 receptor (MC4R) gene. J. Anim. Sci. 2000, 78, 791–792. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Hu, Z.-L.; Dracheva, S.; Jang, W.; Maglott, D.; Bastiaansen, J.; Rothschild, M.F.; Reecy, J.M. A QTL resource and comparison tool for pigs: PigQTLDB. Mamm. Genome 2005, 16, 792–800. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Fontanesi, L.; Buttazzoni, L.; Galimberti, G.; Calò, D.G.; Scotti, E.; Russo, V. Association between melanocortin 4 receptor (MC4R) gene haplotypes and carcass and production traits in Italian Large White pigs evaluated with a selective genotyping approach. Livest. Sci. 2013, 157, 48–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Tatro, J.B. Receptor biology of the melanocortins, a family of neuroimmunomodulatory peptides. Neuroimmunomodulation 1996, 3, 259–284. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Muñoz, M.; Bozzi, R.; García, F.; Núñez, Y.; Geraci, C.; Crovetti, A.; García-Casco, J.; Alves, E.; Škrlep, M.; Charneca, R.; et al. Diversity across major and candidate genes in European local pig breeds. PLoS ONE 2018, 13, e0207475. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Valluzzi, C.; Rando, A.; Di Gregorio, P. Genetic variability of Nero Lucano pig breed at IGF2, LEP, MC4R, PIK3C3, RYR1 and VRTN loci. Ital. J. Anim. Sci. 2019, 18, 1321–1326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Hirose, K.; Ito, T.; Fukawa, K.; Arakawa, A.; Mikawa, S.; Hayashi, Y.; Tanaka, K. Evaluation of effects of multiple candidate genes (LEP, LEPR, MC4R, PIK3C3, and VRTN) on production traits in Duroc pigs. Anim. Sci. J. 2014, 85, 198–206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Jokubka, R.; Maak, S.; Kerziene, S.; Swalve, H.H. Association of a melanocortin 4 receptor (MC4R) polymorphism with performance traits in Lithuanian White pigs. J. Anim. Breed. Genet. 2006, 123, 17–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Davoli, R.; Braglia, S.; Valastro, V.; Annaratone, C.; Comella, M.; Zambonelli, P.; Nisi, I.; Gallo, M.; Buttazzoni, L.; Russo, V. Analysis of MC4R polymorphism in Italian Large White and Italian Duroc pigs: Association with carcass traits. Meat Sci. 2012, 90, 887–892. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Van den Broeke, A.; Aluwé, M.; Tuyttens, F.A.M.; Ampe, B.; Vanhaecke, L.; Wauters, J.; Janssens, S.; Coussé, A.; Buys, N.; Millet, S. An intervention study demonstrates effects of MC4R genotype on boar taint and performances of growing-finishing pigs. J. Anim. Sci. 2015, 93, 934–943. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Zhang, J.; Li, J.; Wu, C.; Hu, Z.; An, L.; Wan, Y.; Fang, C.; Zhang, X.; Li, J.; Wang, Y. The Asp298Asn polymorphism of melanocortin-4 receptor (MC4R) in pigs: Evidence for its potential effects on MC4R constitutive activity and cell surface expression. Anim. Genet. 2020, 51, 694–706. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Chowdhary, B.P.; Thomsen, P.D.; Harbitz, I.; Landset, M.; Gustavsson, I. Precise localization of the genes for glucose phosphate isomerase (GPI), calcium release channel (CRC), hormone-sensitive lipase (LIPE), and growth hormone (GH) in pigs, using nonradioactive in situ hybridization. Cytogenet. Cell Genet. 1994, 67, 211–214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Dietze, B.; Henke, J.; Eichinger, H.M.; Lehmann-Horn, F.; Melzer, W. Malignant hyperthermia mutation Arg615Cys in the porcine ryanodine receptor alters voltage dependence of Ca2+ release. J. Physiol. 2000, 526 Pt 3, 507–514. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Saintilan, R.; Mérour, I.; Schwob, S.; Sellier, P.; Bidanel, J.; Gilbert, H. Genetic parameters and halothane genotype effect for residual feed intake in Piétrain growing pigs. Livest. Sci. 2011, 142, 203–209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Oliván, M.; González, J.; Bassols, A.; Díaz, F.; Carreras, R.; Mainau, E.; Arroyo, L.; Peña, R.; Potes, Y.; Coto-Montes, A.; et al. Effect of sex and RYR1 gene mutation on the muscle proteomic profile and main physiological biomarkers in pigs at slaughter. Meat Sci. 2018, 141, 81–90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Fiedler, I.; Ender, K.; Wicke, M.; Maak, S.; Lengerken, G.V.; Meyer, W. Structural and functional characteristics of muscle fibres in pigs with different malignant hyperthermia susceptibility (MHS) and different meat quality. Meat Sci. 1999, 53, 9–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Fujii, J.; Otsu, K.; Zorzato, F.; de Leon, S.; Khanna, V.K.; Weiler, J.E.; O’Brien, P.J.; MacLennan, D.H. Identification of a mutation in porcine ryanodine receptor associated with malignant hyperthermia. Science 1991, 253, 448–451. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Matassino, D.; Davoli, R.; Occidente, M.; Milc, J.A.; Caiola, C.; Rocco, M. Identificazione del genotipo per la sensibilità all’alotano in alcuni tipi genetici autoctoni. Option Mediterranéennes 2000, 41, 265. [Google Scholar]
  41. Ramos, A.M.; Delgado, J.V.; Rangel-Figueiredo, T.; Barba, C.; Matos, J.; Cumbreras, M. Genotypic and allelic frequencies of the RYRI locus in the Manchado de Jabugo pig breed. In Quality of Meat and Fat in Pigs as Affected by Genetics and Nutrition; EAAP Scientific Series; Wageningen Academic Publishers: Wageningen, The Netherlands, 2000; Volume 100, pp. 175–178. ISBN 978-90-8686-504-8. [Google Scholar]
  42. Labroue, F.; Luquet, M.; Marsac, H.; Canope, I.; Rinaldo, D.; Ollivier, L. Performances of French local breeds. In Pig Genetic Resources in Europe. Characterisation and Conservation; Ollivier, L., Ed.; EAAP (European Federation of Animal Science): Rome, Italy, 2001; Volume 104, ISBN 9074134939/9789074134934. [Google Scholar]
  43. Crovetti, A.; Bozzi, R.; Nardi, L.; Franci, O.; Fontanesi, L. Assessment of variability of genes associated with meat quality traits in Cinta Senese pigs. Ital. J. Anim. Sci. 2007, 6, 101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Pugliese, C.; Sirtori, F. Quality of meat and meat products produced from southern European pig breeds. Meat Sci. 2012, 90, 511–518. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Flak, J.N.; Myers, M.G. Minireview: CNS mechanisms of leptin action. Mol. Endocrinol. 2016, 30, 3–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Neuenschwander, S.; Rettenberger, G.; Meijerink, E.; Jörg, H.; Stranzinger, G. Partial characterization of porcine obesity gene (OBS) and its localization to chromosome 18 by somatic cell hybrids. Anim. Genet. 1996, 27, 275–278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Cepica, S.; Yerle, M.; Stratil, A.; Schröffel, J.; Redl, B. Regional localization of porcine MYOD1, MYF5, LEP, UCP3 and LCN1 genes. Anim. Genet. 1999, 30, 476–478. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Bidwell, C.; Ji, S.; Frank, G.R.; Cornelius, S.G.; Willis, G.M.; Spurlock, M.E. Cloning and expression of the porcine obese gene. Anim. Biotechnol. 1997, 8, 191–206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Stratil, A.; Peelman, L.; Van Poucke, M.; Cepica, S. A HinfI PCR-RFLP at the porcine leptin (LEP) gene. Anim. Genet. 1997, 28, 371–372. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  50. de Oliveira Peixoto, J.; Facioni Guimarães, S.E.; Sávio Lopes, P.; Menck Soares, M.A.; Vieira Pires, A.; Gualberto Barbosa, M.V.; de Almeida Torres, R.; de Almeida e Silva, M. Associations of leptin gene polymorphisms with production traits in pigs. J. Anim. Breed. Genet. 2006, 123, 378–383. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  51. Kim, J.H.; Lee, Y.S.; Park, E.W.; Seo, B.Y.; Cho, I.C.; Lee, J.G.; Oh, S.J.; Lee, J.H.; Jeon, J.T. Assignment of the phosphoinositide-3-kinase, class 3 (PIK3C3) gene to porcine chromosome 6q22-->q23 by somatic cell and radiation hybrid panel mapping. Cytogenet. Genome Res. 2005, 108, 362. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Hirose, K.; Takizawa, T.; Fukawa, K.; Ito, T.; Ueda, M.; Hayashi, Y.; Tanaka, K. Association of an SNP marker in exon 24 of a class 3 phosphoinositide-3-kinase (PIK3C3) gene with production traits in Duroc pigs. Anim. Sci. J. 2011, 82, 46–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Genualdo, V.; Perucatti, A.; Marletta, D.; Castiglioni, B.; Bordonaro, S.; Iannaccone, M.; Ciotola, F.; Peretti, V.; Iannuzzi, A. Cytogenetic investigation in two endangered pig breeds raised in Southern-Italy: Clinical and environmental aspects. Livest. Sci. 2018, 216, 36–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Genualdo, V.; Turri, F.; Pizzi, F.; Castiglioni, B.; Marletta, D.; Iannuzzi, A. Sperm Nuclei Analysis and Nuclear Organization of a Fertile Boar-Pig Hybrid by 2D FISH on Both Total and Motile Sperm Fractions. Animals 2021, 11, 738. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Table 2. Genotype distribution, allele frequencies and Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium tests for MC4R polymorphisms in Nero Siciliano pig breed.
Table 2. Genotype distribution, allele frequencies and Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium tests for MC4R polymorphisms in Nero Siciliano pig breed.
GeneLocus
MC4R−780 C>G
NSampleCCCGGGCGχ2p-Value
87Population285-51%49%79.355<0.001
18Boars-18-50%50%18<0.001
69Sows267-51%49%61.444<0.001
c.135 C>T
NSampleCCCTTTCTχ2p-value
87Population--TT-100%--
18Boars--TT-100%--
69Sows--TT-100%--
c.175 C>T
NSampleCCCTTTCTχ2p-value
87Population778293%7%7.0140.008
18Boars143186%14%1.6550.1982
69Sows635195%5%4.2880.0397
c.707 G>A
NSampleGGGAAAGAχ2p-value
87Population33441063%37%0.6660.414
18Boars610261%39%0.51300.4738
69Sows2734864%36%0.30390.5814
c.1426 G>A
NSampleGGGAAAGAχ2p-value
87Population24471655%45%0.6990.403
18Boars210639%61%0.51310.4738
69Sows22371059%41%0.77400.3790
Table 3. Genotype distributions, allele frequencies and Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium tests for RYR1, LEP and PIK3C3 polymorphisms in the Nero Siciliano pig breed.
Table 3. Genotype distributions, allele frequencies and Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium tests for RYR1, LEP and PIK3C3 polymorphisms in the Nero Siciliano pig breed.
GeneLocus
RYR1g.1843 C>T
NSampleCCCTTTCTχ2p-value
87Population807-96%4%0.1520.696
18Boar171-97%3%0.0150.903
69Sows636-96%4%0.1420.705
LEPg.2728 G>A
NSexGGGAAAGAχ2p-value
87Population1170653%47%32.855<0.001
18Boar213347%53%3.6270.0568
69Sows957354%46%30.4917<0.001
c.3469 T>C
NSampleTTTCCCTCχ2p-value
87Population7016-91%9%0.9040.342
18Boar162-94%6%0.06230.8029
68Sows5414-90%10%0.89550.3440
PIK3C3g.2604 C>T
NSexCCCTTTCTχ2p-value
87Population1275-57%43%49.931<0.001
18Boar-18-50%50%18<0.001
69Sows1257-59%41%34.1687<0.001
Table 4. Observed (Ho) and expected heterozygosity (He) and fixation index (F) values by locus in Nero Siciliano.
Table 4. Observed (Ho) and expected heterozygosity (He) and fixation index (F) values by locus in Nero Siciliano.
GeneSNPHoHeF
MC4R−780 C>G0.9770.500−0.955
c.135 C>T---
c.175 C>T
rs81221060
0.0920.1280.284
c.707G>A
rs81221061
0.5060.465−0.088
c.1426 G>A
rs81219178
0.5400.496−0.090
RYR1c.1843C>T
rs706913914
0.0800.077−0.042
LEPg.2728G>A
rs3475337814
0.8620.490−0.758
c.3469 T>C
rs45431504
0.1860.169−0.103
PIK3C3c.2604 C>T
rs81211045
0.8050.498−0.615
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Tumino, S.; Carlentini, M.; Chessari, G.; Criscione, A.; Antoci, A.; Marletta, D.; Bordonaro, S. Genetic Variability of Loci Affecting Meat Quality and Production in Nero Siciliano Pig Breed. Animals 2025, 15, 2143. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani15142143

AMA Style

Tumino S, Carlentini M, Chessari G, Criscione A, Antoci A, Marletta D, Bordonaro S. Genetic Variability of Loci Affecting Meat Quality and Production in Nero Siciliano Pig Breed. Animals. 2025; 15(14):2143. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani15142143

Chicago/Turabian Style

Tumino, Serena, Morena Carlentini, Giorgio Chessari, Andrea Criscione, Aurora Antoci, Donata Marletta, and Salvatore Bordonaro. 2025. "Genetic Variability of Loci Affecting Meat Quality and Production in Nero Siciliano Pig Breed" Animals 15, no. 14: 2143. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani15142143

APA Style

Tumino, S., Carlentini, M., Chessari, G., Criscione, A., Antoci, A., Marletta, D., & Bordonaro, S. (2025). Genetic Variability of Loci Affecting Meat Quality and Production in Nero Siciliano Pig Breed. Animals, 15(14), 2143. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani15142143

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop