Next Article in Journal
Uncovering Sexual Differences in the External Morphology, Appendicular Muscles, and Internal Organs of a Fossorial Narrow-Mouth Frog (Kaloula borealis)
Previous Article in Journal
Sources of Environmental Exposure to the Naturally Occurring Anabolic Steroid Ecdysterone in Horses
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Effects of Andrographolide-Loaded Nanostructured Lipid Carriers on Growth, Feed Efficiency, and Resistance to Streptococcus agalactiae in Nile Tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus)

by
Warut Kengkittipat
1,2,
Manoj Tukaram Kamble
2,*,
Sirikorn Kitiyodom
2,
Jakarwan Yostawonkul
3,
Gotchagorn Sawatphakdee
2,
Kim D. Thompson
4,
Seema Vijay Medhe
5 and
Nopadon Pirarat
2,*
1
International Graduate Course of Veterinary Science and Technology (VST), Faculty of Veterinary Science, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok 10330, Thailand
2
Center of Excellence in Wildlife, Exotic, and Aquatic Animal Pathology, Faculty of Veterinary Science, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok 10330, Thailand
3
National Nanotechnology Center (NANOTEC), National Science and Technology Development Agency (NSTDA), Pathumthani 12120, Thailand
4
Moredun Research Institute, Penicuik EH26 0PZ, UK
5
ASEAN Institute for Health Development, Mahidol University, Salaya, Putthamonthon, Nakhon Pathom 73170, Thailand
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Animals 2025, 15(14), 2117; https://doi.org/10.3390/ani15142117
Submission received: 17 May 2025 / Revised: 10 July 2025 / Accepted: 14 July 2025 / Published: 17 July 2025
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Lipid-Based Nanoparticles for Sustainable Aquaculture)

Simple Summary

Tilapia farming plays a vital role in providing affordable, nutritious food worldwide. However, disease outbreaks—particularly those caused by harmful bacteria such as Streptococcus agalactiae—can lead to high fish mortality and severe economic losses. To reduce reliance on antibiotics, which contribute to resistance and environmental concerns, researchers are exploring safer, plant-based alternatives. In this study, we used a natural compound, andrographolide, derived from Andrographis paniculata, and enhanced its efficacy by incorporating it into a lipid-based nanocarrier system. This formulation protected the compound and improved its absorption in the fish. When added to the tilapia diet, the new formulation significantly boosted growth, improved feed utilization, supported liver health, and most importantly, enhanced resistance to bacterial infection. Compared to conventional treatments or the plant compound alone, the nanostructured lipid carrier system delivered markedly better outcomes. These findings suggest that integrating natural bioactives with advanced delivery technologies can help farmers raise healthier fish more sustainably. This approach could reduce chemical use in aquaculture, support environmental protection, and improve global food security by making fish farming more productive and resilient.

Abstract

The increasing demand for sustainable disease management in aquaculture has intensified interest in plant-based therapeutics. This study evaluated the formulation and efficacy of andrographolide-loaded nanostructured lipid carriers (AND-NLCs) in Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus) challenged with Streptococcus agalactiae ENC06. AND-NLCs were prepared by the phase-inversion technique and characterized by dynamic light scattering, transmission electron microscopy (TEM), Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR), and in vitro release profiling. Antibacterial activity was assessed by measuring inhibition zone diameters, minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC), and minimum bactericidal concentration (MBC). Growth performance, feed utilization, hepatosomatic index (HSI), and disease resistance were evaluated over a 60-day feeding trial. The AND-NLCs exhibited an optimal particle size (189.6 nm), high encapsulation efficiency (90.58%), sustained release, and structural stability. Compared to the free AND and control group, AND-NLC supplementation significantly improved growth, feed efficiency, HSI, and positive allometric growth. It also enhanced survival (73.3%) and relative percent survival (RPS = 65.6%) following S. agalactiae ENC06 infection. Antibacterial efficacy and physiological responses showed positive correlations with nanoparticle characteristics. These findings suggest that AND-NLCs enhance bioavailability and therapeutic efficacy, supporting their potential as a functional dietary additive to promote growth and improve disease resistance in tilapia aquaculture.

1. Introduction

Aquaculture has emerged as one of the fastest-growing sectors in agriculture, driven by the rising global demand for fish protein in response to population growth [1,2]. Among freshwater farmed species, Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus) ranks second globally, with a production volume reaching 5.3 million tonnes in 2022 [3]. This species is widely cultivated due to its strong market demand, rapid growth, high economic returns, and tolerance to varying environmental conditions [4]. To increase production, farmers often adopt intensive aquaculture systems; however, intensification can compromise sustainability by increasing the risk of disease outbreaks and resulting in significant economic losses [5,6]. Nile tilapia is particularly vulnerable to streptococcosis, a bacterial disease not always named for the genus but with considerable impact on tilapia farming [7,8].
Streptococcus agalactiae (Group B Streptococcus; GBS) is a major pathogen in commercial aquaculture worldwide and is responsible for severe outbreaks in farmed fish [9]. In Thailand, repeated incidents of high mortality due to GBS have been reported in Nile tilapia reared in cage and earthen pond systems [10,11]. Among the genotypes isolated, the β-hemolytic serotype Ia strain is most commonly detected in Thai aquaculture [10]. Genomic analysis has revealed that these isolates belong to sequence type (ST) 7 within clonal complex (CC) 7 and include strains such as FNA07, FPrA02, and ENC06—genotypes known to cause septicemia in fish and opportunistic infections in humans [12,13]. Although these strains share serotype Ia and sequence type ST7, they exhibit minor genetic variation in virulence loci such as scpB and cylE, which may influence their pathogenicity [14,15]. Experimental infections in Nile tilapia have demonstrated variable clinical outcomes among strains, supporting the notion that isolates like ENC06 may cause more severe systemic disease [16,17].
In commercial tilapia farming, antibiotics and chemotherapeutic agents have traditionally been used to control bacterial diseases [18]. However, the overuse and misuse of these compounds have raised concerns about the emergence of antibiotic-resistant bacteria, environmental pollution, and consumer safety issues [19]. Consequently, interest has grown in alternative approaches, including plant-based extracts [8,20,21,22], probiotics, and prebiotics [23] for disease control in aquaculture.
Among various plant-derived compounds, andrographolide (AND)—a diterpenoid lactone from Andrographis paniculata—has shown considerable potential due to its wide-ranging pharmacological activities, including antimicrobial, antifungal, anticancer, hepatoprotective, anti-inflammatory, and immunomodulatory effects [24,25,26,27]. Although AND has been more widely studied for its antiviral and anti-inflammatory properties, emerging evidence suggests that it also possesses antibacterial activity, particularly against Gram-positive bacteria such as Staphylococcus aureus and Streptococcus spp. [28,29]. Due to the increasing interest in phytogenic alternatives to antibiotics in aquaculture, AND was selected for this study based on its dual potential as an antimicrobial [28] and immune modulator [30]. Moreover, its natural origin, low toxicity, and compatibility with nanocarrier systems make it a promising candidate for sustainable disease management in tilapia aquaculture [27]. Accordingly, advanced drug delivery systems are required to improve the bioavailability, stability, and therapeutic efficacy of AND in aquatic species.
Nanostructured lipid carriers (NLCs) have emerged as promising delivery systems for hydrophobic and unstable bioactives such as AND [31,32]. NLCs encapsulate bioactive compounds within a lipid matrix, protecting them from degradation, enabling controlled release, and enhancing absorption and therapeutic performance. Our previous research successfully applied NLCs for delivering 17α-methyltestosterone in red tilapia [33,34], clove oil-NLCs for whiteleg shrimp [35], and nano emulsified mangosteen peel extract in Nile tilapia [36]. However, no study has yet investigated the application of AND-loaded NLCs (AND-NLCs) in Nile tilapia. Therefore, this study aimed to formulate and characterize AND-NLCs, investigate their physicochemical properties, evaluate their in vitro antibacterial activity, and determine their in vivo effects on growth performance, feed utilization, hepatosomatic index, length–weight relationship, and disease resistance against S. agalactiae ENC06 in Nile tilapia. The decision to focus on S. agalactiae was based on its widespread prevalence and economic significance in Thai tilapia aquaculture, where serotype Ia strains—including ENC06—are commonly implicated in streptococcosis outbreaks. As such, it represents a high-priority pathogen for therapeutic intervention and vaccine development in this region.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Chemicals

Andrographolide was procured from Specialty Natural Product Co., Ltd. (Bangkok, Thailand). Sorbitan oleate, cetearyl alcohol, cocoglucoside, polyoxyethylene [20] sorbitan monolaurate, poloxamer, and glycerol were obtained from Croda (Thailand) Co., Ltd. (Bangkok, Thailand). Ethoxydiglycol was supplied by Myskin Recipe Co., Ltd. (Bangkok, Thailand). All other chemicals used were of analytical grade.

2.2. Preparation of Andrographolide-Loaded Nanostructured Lipid Carriers

AND was incorporated into NLC using the phase-inversion composition technique combined with high-energy homogenization [34]. Initially, the lipid phase had been prepared by dissolving 200 mg of AND in ethoxydiglycol (3.0 g), sorbitan oleate (3.0 g), and a mixture of cetearyl alcohol and cocoglucoside (1.0 g) under magnetic stirring at 60 °C. Simultaneously, the aqueous phase had been prepared by dissolving polyoxyethylene [20] sorbitan monolaurate (3.0 g), poloxamer 188 (2.0 g), and glycerol (2.5 g) in deionized water at 60 °C. A pre-emulsion was subsequently formed by combining the lipid and aqueous phases under continuous magnetic stirring at 500 rpm for 5 min at 60 °C. The final AND-NLC formulation was obtained using a probe sonicator set at 30% amplitude for 5 min (30-s pulses with 10-s intervals), followed by cooling to room temperature for subsequent analysis.

2.3. Particle Characterization

The hydrodynamic diameter, polydispersity index (PDI), and zeta potential of the synthesized nanoparticles were measured using dynamic light scattering (DLS) with a Zetasizer NanoZS (Malvern Instruments, Worcestershire, UK). Prior to measurement, the nanoparticle samples had been diluted 50-fold with deionized water and analyzed at 25 °C. All measurements were conducted in triplicate to ensure accuracy and reproducibility.
In addition, particle size and morphology were evaluated using a transmission electron microscope (TEM; HT7800, Hitachi, Tokyo, Japan) operated at 80 kV. Samples had been diluted 50-fold in deionized water (pH 7.0), placed onto carbon-coated grids, and dried using filter paper. The grids were stained with a uranyless staining solution for 2 min, rinsed with deionized water, and air-dried before imaging to assess morphological characteristics.

2.4. Encapsulation Efficiency and In Vitro Release of AND-NLC

The encapsulation efficiency (EE) of AND and AND-NLC was determined using a regenerated cellulose centrifugal filter device with a 30 kDa molecular weight cutoff (Amicon Ultra-15, Merck Millipore Ltd., Darmstadt, Germany) [34]. Approximately 1.5 mL of each sample was loaded into the filter unit and centrifuged according to the manufacturer’s instructions to separate unencapsulated AND. The filtrate containing the free drug was subjected to solvent extraction, following the method by Yostawonkul et al. [33]. The recovered AND was then passed through a 0.2 μm nylon syringe filter prior to analysis by high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) equipped with a photodiode array detector (HPLC-PAD 2998 separation unit and PDA, Water, Milford, MA, USA). Chromatographic separation was achieved using an Ascentis C18 reverse-phase column (5 μm, 25 cm × 4.6 mm), with a mobile phase of acetonitrile and methanol (60:40) at a flow rate of 1 mL/min. The injection volume was 20 μL, and the detection was carried out at a wavelength of 240 nm with a run time of 15 min. Encapsulation efficiency was calculated using the following formula:
EE (%) = ((Ci − Cf)/Ci) × 100
where Ci represents the initial concentration of AND used during formulation, and Cf denotes the amount of unencapsulated (free) AND present in the solution.
The in vitro release behavior of AND from the NLC formulation was evaluated in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS, pH 6.8) at 28 °C, based on modified protocols from previous studies [34]. A 1.5 mL sample of AND-NLC was placed in dialysis tubing (MWCO 3.5 kDa; Merck Millipore, Burlington, MA, USA) and immersed in 30 mL of receiving medium composed of PBS and ethanol (95:5 v/v). The dialysis system was maintained in a shaker incubator at 200 rpm (Vision Scientific Co., Yuseong-Gu, Daejeon-Si, Republic of Korea). At predetermined time intervals (1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 10, 24, and 48 h), 1 mL of the external buffer was withdrawn and immediately replaced with fresh medium. The concentration of AND in the release medium was quantified using HPLC under the same analytical conditions as previously described. To evaluate the release mechanism, the data were fitted to the Avrami model (Equation (2)):
R = 1 − exp (−(kt)n)
where R is the cumulative release of AND at time t, k is the release rate constant, and n is the release mechanism parameter.

2.5. Fourier-Transform Infrared (FTIR) Spectroscopy Analysis

FTIR spectra of AND and AND-NLC were recorded using a Nicolet Summit Pro spectrometer (Thermo Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) [37]. For sample preparation, AND or AND-NLC powder was mixed with potassium bromide (KBr) at a 1:100 weight ratio, finely ground, and compressed into translucent pellets. Spectral acquisition was conducted over the range of 500–4000 cm−1 with a resolution of 4 cm−1. A total of 64 scans were acquired and averaged for each sample. All measurements had been performed in triplicate to ensure reliability and reproducibility of the results.

2.6. Evaluation of Antimicrobial Activity

The antimicrobial properties of the AND or AND-NLC were evaluated using the agar well diffusion method. Given the focus of this study on targeted disease management, three S. agalactiae strains (FNA07, FPrA02, ENC06)—which had been previously isolated from diseased tilapia in Thailand—were selected as representative pathogenic strains for in vitro evaluation. These strains were cultured on blood agar plates (tryptic soy agar supplemented with 5% sheep blood; Bacto™, Waltham, MA, USA) and incubated at 28 °C for 24 h [9]. Bacterial suspensions were prepared in sterile 0.85% NaCl and adjusted to match a 0.5 McFarland standard. The suspensions were uniformly spread onto Mueller–Hinton agar (MHA) plates containing 5% sheep blood. Wells with a diameter of 6 mm were created using sterile pipette tips, and 50 µL of either AND or AND-NLC was added to each well. The plates were subsequently incubated at 28 °C for 24 h, after which the inhibition zone diameters (IZDs) were measured using a vernier caliper.

2.7. Evaluation of Minimum Inhibitory Concentration (MIC) and Minimum Bactericidal Concentration (MBC)

The MIC was determined using the broth microdilution technique [37]. AND or AND-NLC were serially diluted two-fold in Mueller–Hinton broth (MHB) across 96-well microplates to obtain ten concentration levels ranging from 2000 to 3.9 ppm, with a final volume of 100 µL per well. An equal volume (100 µL) of bacterial suspension, adjusted to 106 CFU/mL, was added to each well. Plates were incubated at 28 °C for 24 h. Sterile MHB served as the negative control, while MHB with bacterial inoculum was used as the positive control. The MIC was recorded as the lowest concentration at which no visible bacterial growth was observed. For MBC determination, samples from each well were plated on Mueller–Hinton agar (MHA), and the absence of bacterial colonies after incubation was considered indicative of bactericidal activity.

2.8. Feed Supplementation

A concentration of 2 mg/mL of AND or AND-NLC was used to prepare the experimental diets using commercial tilapia feed (CP-7710; Charoen Pokphand Foods Public Company Limited, Samut Sakhon, Thailand). The feed preparation followed the method previously described by Kamble et al. [21], with minor modifications. Briefly, 1 g of commercial feed pellets was placed into a sterile 50 mL beaker. Then, 1 mL of either AND-NLC, free AND, or blank NLC was added, and the mixture was thoroughly stirred with a sterile stainless-steel spatula to ensure uniform coating. The control diet was prepared by mixing feed with distilled water. The treated feed was left to dry at room temperature overnight and was subsequently stored in clean plastic bags at 4 °C until further use.

2.9. Experimental Design

Nile tilapia fingerlings (5–7 g; total n = 600) were disinfected with 50 ppm formalin and were acclimated for 14 days in fiberglass tanks supplied with flow-through dechlorinated tap water and continuous aeration. The experiment was conducted using a completely randomized design with four treatment groups: control, AND, AND-NLC, and NLC. Each treatment included 50 fish per tank in triplicate. To maintain water quality, 30–50% of the water was exchanged daily. Throughout the acclimation and experimental periods, water temperature, dissolved oxygen, and pH were monitored daily and were maintained at 25–28 °C, 5.24–5.98 mg/L, and 7.48–8.16, respectively. Fish were fed commercial pellet feed twice daily at 3% of their body weight for a duration of two months. This design enabled direct comparison of AND and AND-NLC efficacy in improving fish performance and resistance against a relevant bacterial pathogen, without introducing interspecies or inter-pathogen variability.

2.10. Growth Performance and Feed Utilization

The growth performance and feed utilization efficiency of Nile tilapia were evaluated after 1 and 2 months of feeding [38]. At each time point, all fish from each treatment group were assessed by recording total weight and length. Growth parameters and feed utilization were calculated using the following formulas:
Weight gain (WG, g/fish) = Final weight (FW, g) − Initial weight (IW, g)
Specific growth rate (SGR, %/day) = 100 × [(ln FW − ln IW)/Experimental days (T)]
Mean daily intake (MDI, g/fish/day) = (Total feed intake (g)/T)/Number of fish per tank)
Feed conversion ratio (FCR) = Feed intake (g)/Wet weight gain (g)
Protein efficiency ratio (PER) = Wet weight gain (g)/Protein intake (g)
Hepatosomatic Index (HSI, %) = (Liver weight/Body weight) × 100

2.11. Length–Weight Relationship, Growth Pattern, and Relative Condition Factor

The length–weight relationship (LWR) and relative condition factor (Kn) of Nile tilapia were evaluated after a 60-day feeding trial using experimental diets. The LWR, which describes the correlation between the fish’s total length and body weight, was calculated using the model proposed by Pauly [39]:
W = aLb
In this equation, W represents the body weight (g), L is the total length (cm), a denotes the intercept indicating the initial growth coefficient, and b represents the exponent that describes the growth pattern. To facilitate linear regression analysis, both sides of the equation were log-transformed:
logW = loga + b·logL
The exponent b characterizes the type of growth. A value of b = 3 indicates isometric growth, where the fish grows proportionally in length and weight. When b ≠ 3, growth is considered allometric—either positive (b > 3), meaning weight increases faster than length, or negative (b < 3), meaning length increases more than weight [40].
To assess the physiological well-being of the fish, the relative Kn was applied. This parameter provides insight into the health and robustness of individual fish relative to a standard weight–length relationship and was calculated using the formula from Le Cren [41]:
Kn = Wo/Wc
Here, Wo denotes the observed weight of the fish, and Wc is the expected weight calculated from the length–weight regression equation (W = aL^b). The regression was derived from all experimental fish at day 60 to represent the overall weight–length relationship. A Kn value greater than 1 indicates that the fish is in better-than-average condition, whereas a value less than 1 suggests suboptimal health or growth relative to a typical specimen of the same length.

2.12. Disease Resistance of Nile Tilapia Against S. agalactiace ENC06

ENC06 was selected for the challenge experiment based on its marginally higher zone of inhibition in the antibacterial assay and its documented association with severe streptococcosis outbreaks in Thai Nile tilapia aquaculture [16,17]. This strain had been widely recognized for its virulence and epidemiological relevance, making it a suitable model for evaluating disease resistance.
Following 60 days of feeding, Nile tilapia were challenged with S. agalactiae ENC06 by intraperitoneal (IP) injection of 100 µL bacterial suspension (1 × 106 CFU/mL) into 30 fish per treatment group. Mortality was recorded over the subsequent 15 days. During the challenge period, water quality parameters were consistently maintained at 29.9 ± 0.05 °C for temperature, pH 7.37 ± 0.06, and dissolved oxygen at 4.97 ± 0.04 mg/L. To verify bacterial infection as the cause of mortality, tissues from dead or moribund fish—including kidney, spleen, and brain—were aseptically collected and cultured on tryptic soy agar (TSA) supplemented with 5% sheep blood. The plates were incubated at 28 °C for 24–48 h. Colonies were identified based on morphological features and β-hemolytic activity, confirming the presence of S. agalactiae. Cumulative mortality and relative percent survival (RPS) for the AND-NLC-supplemented groups were calculated using the following formulas [42]:
Cumulative mortality (%) = (Number of mortalities/Total number of fish) × 100
RPS (%) = [1 − (Mortality (%) in treated group/Mortality (%) in control group)] × 100

2.13. Statistical Analysis

Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS software (version 26; IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA). One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA), followed by Tukey’s Honest Significant Difference (HSD) test, was applied to determine significant differences among treatment groups for growth, feed utilization, and physiological parameters. Kaplan–Meier survival analysis was conducted to estimate cumulative survival, and log-rank (Mantel–Cox) tests were used to compare survival curves between groups. Additionally, the Cox proportional hazards model was employed to assess the relative risk of mortality (hazard ratios) among different dietary treatments. The Student’s t-test was used to evaluate differences between two time points (30 and 60 days). Pearson’s correlation coefficients (r) were calculated to examine relationships among nanoparticle characteristics, antibacterial activity, growth performance, and disease resistance. A p-value less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

3. Results

3.1. Physicochemical Properties

The AND-NLCs had exhibited an average particle size of 189.6 ± 3.2 nm, slightly larger than the blank NLCs (168.0 ± 2.2 nm), indicating successful incorporation of the drug (Table 1). The PDI had decreased from 0.262 ± 0.028 in NLCs to 0.159 ± 0.038 in AND-NLCs, reflecting enhanced particle uniformity. Zeta potential values had remained moderately negative (−20.0 to −21.33 mV), suggesting good colloidal stability. Notably, the AND-NLC formulation had demonstrated a high encapsulation efficiency of 90.58 ± 0.13%, confirming effective drug loading within the lipid matrix.
The size distribution by intensity of the AND-NLCs showed a peak around 100 nm (Figure 1A), indicating a well-defined particle size distribution suitable for drug delivery.
TEM images of AND-NLCs revealed spherical particles with an average size of approximately 200 nm (Figure 1B,C), consistent with the DLS data. Figure 1D shows the cumulative release profiles of AND and AND-NLCs, where AND-NLCs exhibited a controlled release pattern characterized by an initial burst followed by sustained release, indicating efficient drug encapsulation and controlled release behavior.

3.2. FTIR Analysis

FTIR spectra of AND and AND-NLC reveal distinct changes due to the encapsulation of andrographolide in nanostructured lipid carriers (Figure 2). The O-H stretching peak at 3330 cm−1 in AND had shifted slightly to 3340 cm−1 in AND-NLC, indicating minor interactions between AND and the lipid matrix. The C=O stretching peak at 1725 cm−1 for AND had shifted to 1741 cm−1 in AND-NLC, suggesting the formation of interactions between the drug and the lipid components. Additionally, the disappearance of the C=C stretching peak at 1674 cm−1 in AND-NLC further supported the encapsulation process, indicating modifications in the molecular environment.
The shifts in C-H bending and C-O stretching peaks from AND to AND-NLC (e.g., from 1314 cm−1 to 1343 cm−1) confirmed changes in the interaction between the drug and lipid carriers. These results indicated that the encapsulation of AND in NLCs had altered its molecular structure, suggesting improved stability and potential for enhanced bioavailability.

3.3. Antibacterial Activity

The antibacterial effects of AND and AND-NLC were evaluated against three S. agalactiae strains (FPrA02, FNA07, ENC06). The AND-NLC formulation had exhibited significantly larger inhibition zones (13–14 mm) compared to AND alone (6 mm for all strains), indicating enhanced antibacterial activity upon nanoencapsulation (Table 2).
However, MIC and MBC values for AND-NLC had remained >2000 ppm, suggesting that while AND-NLC had improved surface-level inhibition, it might require higher concentrations to inhibit or kill the bacteria in solution. In contrast, neither the control nor NLC had shown any detectable inhibition zones, MIC, or MBC values, confirming the absence of inherent antibacterial activity in the lipid carrier or the blank treatment.

3.4. Effect of Experimental Diets on Growth Performance and Feed Utilization of Nile Tilapia

After 30 days, no significant differences were observed in FW, WG, and SGR among the treatments, with all groups displaying comparable values (Figure 3A–C). However, by 60 days, fish fed with the AND-NLC diet had achieved the highest FW, WG, and SGR, significantly outperforming the control, AND, and NLC groups.
Feed intake did not differ significantly among the treatments at both 30 and 60 days (Figure 3D). Similarly, at 30 days, no significant differences were found in FCR and PER between the treatments (Figure 3E,F). By contrast, at 60 days, AND-NLC had exhibited the lowest FCR, indicating the most efficient feed conversion, followed by AND and NLC, with the control group exhibiting the highest FCR. Additionally, at 60 days, AND-NLC had shown the highest PER, significantly exceeding the control, NLC, and AND groups. The treatment and antibacterial activity (MIC and MBC) had strong positive effects on growth performance. Size and PDI also contributed positively, while the zeta potential appeared to have a detrimental effect when it was either too high or too low (Figure 4).

3.5. Effect of Time on Growth Performance and Feed Utilization of Experimental Diets

All treatment groups had shown significant increases in FW and WG from day 30 to day 60, indicating time-dependent improvement in growth. The SGR had increased significantly over time only in the NLC group, while it remained unchanged in the other groups. FI also had increased significantly in all groups over time, reflecting elevated metabolic demands associated with growth progression. Notably, FCR was significantly reduced in the AND-NLC group at 60 days, suggesting enhanced feed efficiency, whereas other groups showed no significant change. Similarly, PER had improved significantly across all treatments, with the most pronounced increase observed in the AND-NLC group. Detailed t-test results for each growth and feed utilization parameter are provided in Supplementary Table S1.

3.6. Effects of Experimental Diets on Hepatosomatic Index

At 30 days, no significant differences in HSI had been observed between treatments (Figure 5). However, at 60 days, significant differences emerged, with AND-NLC showing the highest HSI, significantly exceeding the values observed in the control, AND, and NLC groups, which did not differ significantly from each other. At 30 days, no significant differences had been detected among treatments. However, by day 60, the AND-NLC group exhibited significantly higher HSI values compared to all other treatments. Significant increases in HSI were also detected over time within the AND, AND-NLC, and NLC groups, suggesting enhanced liver mass potentially associated with improved nutrient metabolism or liver function. The detailed paired t-test results for HSI across time points are provided in Supplementary Table S1.
HSI is positively correlated with treatment and antibacterial activity (MIC and MBC), indicating improved liver health. In contrast, larger particle sizes and greater polydispersity (size, PDI) were negatively associated with HSI, while greater nanoparticle stability (zeta potential) was supportive of liver function (Figure 4).

3.7. Effects of Experimental Diets on Length–Weight Relationship and Growth Pattern

After 60 days of feeding, Nile tilapia fed diets supplemented with AND-NLC had exhibited the most favorable growth pattern among all treatments (Table 3). The regression coefficient (b = 3.350) in the AND-NLC group had indicated positive allometric growth, suggesting greater weight gain relative to length increase. This was significantly higher than the control (b = 2.697) and NLC (b = 2.619) groups, which had exhibited negative allometric growth, and also higher than the AND group (b = 3.036), which had shown moderate positive allometry. The correlation coefficient (r = 0.969) and coefficient of determination (R2 = 0.940) for the AND-NLC group had reflected a strong linear relationship between length and weight. All models were statistically significant (p < 0.001). The Kn was significantly higher in the AND group (1.229), indicating superior body condition, followed by the AND-NLC group (1.053). The NLC group had shown a significantly lower Kn value (0.971) compared to the other treatments. These results suggest that both AND and AND-NLC can improve fish condition, with AND-NLC demonstrating enhanced potential as a functional feed additive in tilapia aquaculture. The regression graphs illustrating the length–weight relationships for fish fed with control, AND, AND-NLC, and NLC diets are presented in Figure 6A–D.
Treatment and antibacterial activity (MIC and MBC) had improved LWR and Kn, promoting growth balance and fish health. In contrast, particles size and PDI had negatively impacted LWR and Kn, highlighting the need for particle size optimization. Zeta potential had supported both growth balance and fish health (Figure 4).

3.8. Effects of Experimental Diets on Survivorship of Nile Tilapia Following S. agalactiae Challenge (ENC06)

Kaplan–Meier survival curves demonstrated distinct differences in disease resistance among treatment groups following a 60-day dietary regimen and S. agalactiae challenge. A log-rank (Mantel–Cox) test comparing the cumulative survival percentages across the AND, AND-NLC, and NLC groups revealed significant differences (X2(4) = 78.973, p < 0.01) when compared to the control group (Figure 7A).
The infected control group had exhibited the highest mortality (77.8%) and lowest survival (22.2%), with an RPS of 0%, confirming high susceptibility to S. agalactiae. Among the supplemented groups, AND-NLC provided the greatest protective effect, with 26.7% mortality, 73.3% survival, and an RPS of 65.6% (Table 4).
The AND group also improved disease resistance compared to the control, with 35.6% mortality, 64.4% survival, and an RPS of 54.1%. In contrast, the NLC group offered minimal protection, with 75.5% mortality, 24.5% survival, and an RPS of only 2.5%, comparable to the infected control. These results indicated that AND-NLC supplementation substantially enhanced survival and disease resistance in Nile tilapia challenged with S. agalactiae, outperforming both free AND and the carrier alone. Survival and RPS are positively influenced by treatment and antibacterial activity (MIC and MBC), with zeta potential also contributing positively. Size and PDI were found to negatively affect survival, with larger particle sizes and broader particle size distributions being associated with lower survival rates (Figure 4).

3.9. Cox Regression Analysis of Treatment Effects on Survival Time

The Cox regression analysis revealed a significant overall effect of treatment on survival time (X2 = 69.427, df = 4, p < 0.001), confirming that survival outcomes varied among groups (Figure 7B). Compared to the reference group, the AND (Exp(B) = 0.190, p < 0.001), Control (Exp(B) = 0.256, p < 0.001), and NLC (Exp(B) = 0.102, p < 0.001) groups exhibited significantly higher hazard risks (i.e., lower survival probabilities). In contrast, the AND-NLC group (Exp(B) = 0.758, p = 0.253) did not show a statistically significant difference in hazard, suggesting a neutral effect on survival. These findings indicated that AND-NLC supplementation may have mitigated mortality risk more effectively than AND or NLC alone.

4. Discussion

The slight size increase from 168.0 to 189.6 nm confirmed successful drug loading into NLCs without compromising structural integrity. This was further supported by a reduced polydispersity index (from 0.262 to 0.159), indicating improved particle size uniformity [43]. Additionally, a moderately negative zeta potential (~−20 mV) suggested good colloidal stability, minimizing the risk of nanoparticle aggregation [44]. The high encapsulation efficiency (90.58%) demonstrated effective entrapment of the drug within the lipid matrix [45]. Consistent with these findings, the particle size distribution had peaked near 100 nm, and TEM images had revealed ~200 nm spherical particles, confirming uniform morphology. The drug release profile had shown an initial burst followed by sustained release [46,47]. Collectively, these physicochemical characteristics supported the functionality of lipid nanoparticles as efficient drug delivery systems [48].
Building on this, FTIR spectra revealed molecular-level changes upon encapsulating AND into NLCs [49]. A shift in the O-H stretching peak indicated interactions between AND and the lipid matrix, while a pronounced shift in the C=O peak and disappearance of the C=C peak in AND-NLC suggested stronger binding within the lipid environment. These alterations implied enhanced stability and bioavailability of AND [49]. By modifying its molecular structure, NLCs could protect AND from degradation and enhance its absorption, aligning with studies on nanoformulations that had improved poorly soluble drug bioavailability [49,50]. This is particularly important since AND has low oral bioavailability [51]. Thus, lipid-based systems offer a promising strategy to enhance phytoconstituent absorption [49].
Consistent with the structural and molecular findings, the antibacterial activity of AND-NLC was enhanced. While it showed larger inhibition zones, higher concentrations were required to achieve MIC and MBC in solution, a result commonly observed in nanoparticle-based drug delivery systems due to sustained release and delayed interactions with bacterial membranes [52]. AND, a labdane diterpenoid, exerts its antibacterial effect through multiple mechanisms. One of the primary modes of action involves disruption of bacterial membrane integrity, leading to leakage of intracellular contents and cell lysis [53]. AND has also been shown to inhibit the bacterial quorum sensing (QS) system, which plays a crucial role in virulence regulation, biofilm formation, and antibiotic resistance [54]. Furthermore, AND interferes with key bacterial metabolic pathways and inhibits DNA and protein synthesis [55]. These multimodal actions not only confer broad-spectrum antibacterial activity but also reduce the likelihood of resistance development. Fusidic acid-loaded lipid-core nanocapsules demonstrated similar efficacy against Gram-positive bacteria [56]. These results underscore the potential of NLCs in delivering antibacterial agents, particularly against resistant strains [57,58]. For example, cationic NLCs enhanced anti-MRSA activity with oxacillin [57], while virgin coconut oil NLCs exhibited potent effects against multidrug-resistant S. aureus [59].
These formulation advantages translated into biological outcomes. At 30 days, no significant differences in FW, WG, or SGR were observed among treatments. However, by 60 days, fish fed with AND-NLC exhibited significantly improved growth performance over the control, AND, and NLC groups. This delayed improvement reflected the sustained release and bioavailability of AND from NLCs [49,60], ensuring prolonged exposure and absorption [61]. Similar time-dependent responses were observed with curcumin nanoparticles in Nile tilapia (60 days) [62], chitosan nanoparticles (45 days) [63], and curcumin in Gilthead seabream (150 days) [64]. These findings support the hypothesis that extended exposure enhances nutrient absorption and growth [65]. Moreover, the correlation between particle size, PDI, and growth performance suggests that optimized nanoparticle characteristics improve nutrient uptake [66,67].
Beyond the sustained release, several complementary mechanisms contribute to the enhanced bioavailability and biological activity of AND-NLC in fish. Upon ingestion, NLCs are expected to release AND primarily in the intestinal tract, where the lipid matrix of the nanocarrier provides protection against acidic pH and enzymatic degradation in the stomach, ensuring a greater amount of intact compound reaches the absorption site [68]. The small particle size and low PDI enhance interaction with intestinal microvilli and promote uptake via transcellular and paracellular pathways [69]. Additionally, NLCs have been shown to improve intestinal permeability and epithelial absorption of lipophilic compounds, facilitating systemic circulation [70]. Some studies in fish suggest that lipid-based nanoparticles may also promote lymphatic transport, helping to bypass first-pass hepatic metabolism and increasing systemic bioavailability [71]. These mechanisms jointly support the delayed but significant improvements in growth and feed efficiency observed in the AND-NLC group after 60 days. Similar advantages have been reported with nano-curcumin [69], nano-omega-3 fatty acids [70], and Laurus nobilis essential oil nanoparticles [72] in Tilapia sp.
Feed intake did not differ significantly among treatments at 30 or 60 days. However, FI increased significantly over time, consistent with rising metabolic demands during fish growth [73]. The lack of treatment effects on FI suggests that AND-NLC improves feed utilization efficiency rather than stimulating appetite [74,75]. Similar findings were reported with nano-formulated omega-3 fatty acids [70] and herbal extract + nano quercetin [76], where FI remained unchanged while growth improved via enhanced nutrient absorption.
The feed conversion ratio followed a similar trend. No significant differences were observed at 30 days, but AND-NLC-fed fish had the lowest FCR at 60 days, indicating superior feed efficiency. This may result from improved gut health, nutrient absorption, and metabolic efficiency supported by sustained andrographolide release from NLCs [65,74,75]. Similar FCR improvements were reported using nanoemulsions from mangosteen peel [36], cinnamaldehyde [67], and Lavandula officinalis [66], and nano-curcumin [77] in Nile tilapia. Long-term feeding with nanocarriers allows bioactives to deliver sustained metabolic benefits. The FCR reduction in the AND-NLC group after 60 days confirms efficient feed utilization [78]. Correlations with antibacterial activity [79,80] and optimal particle size/PDI [63] further highlight the importance of controlled nanoparticle properties in promoting feed efficiency and disease resistance.
Protein efficiency ratio also improved by 60 days in the AND-NLC group. This was likely due to better protein utilization, supported by reduced catabolism and enhanced nitrogen retention via andrographolide’s anti-inflammatory and hepatoprotective effects [62,81,82,83]. Comparable PER improvements were observed with nano-omega-3 fatty acids [70], cinnamaldehyde nanoemulsion [67], and chitosan-vitamin C nanocomposite [82], attributed to antibacterial activity and nutrient absorption [70,74,84], confirming the role of formulation features in optimizing protein metabolism.
AND-NLC also significantly improved liver function, indicated by increased HSI over time. This enhancement is linked to the sustained release, bioavailability, and antibacterial properties of the formulation [83,85]. Herbal nanocarriers like those with curcumin [62] or andrographolide [86] have similarly outperformed free compounds in supporting liver health [87]. The correlation between HSI, NLC stability, and antibacterial activity emphasizes the relevance of zeta potential and size distribution in liver function outcomes [88,89].
By 60 days, fish in the AND-NLC group exhibited positive allometric growth, reflecting enhanced tissue deposition due to improved protein synthesis [90,91] and nutrient utilization [62,81]. Sustained release contributed to better absorption and feed efficiency [62,63,74]. Similar somatic growth patterns were reported in Nile tilapia fed guava and star gooseberry extract [22], silver barb and zebrafish fed moringa leaf meal [92], and plant protein-based diets [93]. Kn values above one in the AND and AND-NLC groups indicated optimal fish health, aligning with previous studies using guava and star gooseberry extract [22], sargassum meal [94], and varying maltose levels [95].
The AND-NLC supplementation significantly enhanced disease resistance in Nile tilapia challenged with S. agalactiae ENC06. This effect can be attributed to the sustained release, bioavailability, and antibacterial activity of andrographolide, with strong correlations to zeta potential and particle size. These traits prolong antibacterial effects and strengthen immune defense [96,97]. Similar findings have been reported with various herbal nanoformulations in fish [36,67,98,99]. Thus, optimizing carriers’ properties and bioactive selection is key to improving health outcomes in aquaculture systems.
In addition to the demonstrated growth and health benefits of AND-NLC supplementation, future studies should focus on elucidating the immunological pathways and molecular responses activated by this nanoformulated phytochemical. Transcriptomic or proteomic analyses could identify specific immune genes and signaling cascades involved in host defense. Furthermore, intestinal histology and gut microbiota profiling are recommended to better understand how AND-NLCs influence nutrient absorption and gut health. Long-term safety trials under commercial-scale conditions will also be critical to assess potential environmental impacts and cumulative toxicity. Finally, comparative studies with other nanoencapsulated phytocompounds may help identify synergistic combinations and refine dosing strategies for broader applications in aquaculture systems.

5. Conclusions

This study confirmed the potential of AND-NLCs to enhance drug delivery and support growth performance in Nile tilapia. The nanoformulation demonstrated favorable physicochemical properties, improved antibacterial activity, and greater bioavailability compared to free andrographolide. In vivo findings showed significant improvements in growth, feed conversion efficiency, protein utilization, liver condition, and survival following the S. agalactiae ENC06 challenge. These results support the application of AND-NLCs as a promising functional feed additive in aquaculture. Future research should investigate the immunological mechanisms of action, assess gut health and microbial dynamics, and evaluate long-term safety and scalability under real-world farming conditions.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/ani15142117/s1, Table S1: Paired t-test results comparing growth performance and feed utilization parameters (Final Weight [FW], Weight Gain [WG], Specific Growth Rate [SGR], Feed Conversion Ratio [FCR], and Protein Efficiency Ratio [PER]) of Nile tilapia between day 30 and day 60 across different dietary treatments (Control, andrographolide (AND), andrographolide loaded nanostructured lipid carriers (AND-NLC) and nanostructured lipid carriers (NLC)).

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, W.K., M.T.K., and N.P.; methodology, W.K., M.T.K., S.K., J.Y., G.S., and N.P.; software, W.K. and M.T.K.; validation, W.K., M.T.K., S.K., J.Y., and N.P.; formal analysis, W.K., S.K., J.Y., G.S., S.V.M., and N.P.; investigation, W.K., M.T.K., and N.P.; resources, S.K. and N.P.; data curation, W.K., M.T.K., S.K., J.Y., G.S., K.D.T., S.V.M., and N.P.; writing—original draft preparation, W.K. and M.T.K.; writing—review and editing, W.K., M.T.K., S.K., J.Y., G.S., K.D.T., S.V.M., and N.P.; visualization, M.T.K. and N.P.; supervision, M.T.K. and N.P.; project administration, N.P.; funding acquisition, N.P. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the Second Century Fund (C2F), Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand, and the 90th Anniversary of Chulalongkorn University Fund (Ratchadaphiseksomphot Endowment Fund).

Institutional Review Board Statement

All experimental procedures involving fish were reviewed and approved by the Chulalongkorn University Animal Care and Use Committee (CUACUC; Approval No. 2431095) and were conducted in accordance with institutional guidelines and applicable regulatory standards.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available on request from the corresponding author.

Acknowledgments

The present research was supported by the Second Century Fund (C2F), Chulalongkorn University, and the 90th Anniversary of Chulalongkorn University Fund (Ratchadaphiseksomphot Endowment Fund). The Faculty of Veterinary Science at Chulalongkorn University is also acknowledged.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. FAO; IFAD; UNICEF; WFP; WHO. The State of Food Security and Nutrition in the World 2023: Urbanization, Agrifood Systems Transformation and Healthy Diets Across the Rural–Urban Continuum; Food & Agriculture Organization: Rome, Italy, 2023; Volume 2023. [Google Scholar]
  2. Bjørndal, T.; Dey, M.; Tusvik, A. Economic analysis of the contributions of aquaculture to future food security. Aquaculture 2024, 578, 740071. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. FAO. The State of World Fisheries and Aquaculture 2024—Blue Transformation in Action; FAO: Rome, Italy, 2024. [Google Scholar]
  4. El-Sayed, A.-F.M. Tilapia Culture; CABI Publishing: Wallingford, UK, 2006. [Google Scholar]
  5. Ibrahim, R.E.; Elshopakey, G.E.; Abd El-Rahman, G.I.; Ahmed, A.I.; Altohamy, D.E.; Zaglool, A.W.; Younis, E.M.; Abdelwarith, A.A.; Davies, S.J.; Al-Harthi, H.F. Palliative role of colloidal silver nanoparticles synthetized by moringa against Saprolegnia spp. infection in Nile Tilapia: Biochemical, immuno-antioxidant response, gene expression, and histopathological investigation. Aquac. Rep. 2022, 26, 101318. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Mahboub, H.H.; Nada, H.S.; Abdel-Ghany, H.M.; Ghanem, R.; Ahmed Ismail, T.; Abdel Rahman, A.N. Detection, diagnosis, Koch’s postulate, hepatorenal and antioxidant indicators for some systemic pathogenic fungi invading the liver and kidneys of African catfish (Clarias gariepinus) in Egypt with a histopathological approach. Aquac. Res. 2022, 53, 2670–2685. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Abdallah, E.S.H.; Metwally, W.G.M.; Abdel-Rahman, M.A.M.; Albano, M.; Mahmoud, M.M. Streptococcus agalactiae Infection in Nile Tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus): A Review. Biology 2024, 13, 914. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Kamble, M.T.; Gallardo, W.; Salin, K.R.; Pumpuang, S.; Chavan, B.R.; Bhujel, R.C.; Medhe, S.V.; Kettawan, A.; Thompson, K.D.; Pirarat, N. Effect of Moringa oleifera leaf extract on the growth performance, hematology, innate immunity, and disease resistance of Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus) against Streptococcus agalactiae Biotype 2. Animals 2024, 14, 953. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Kayansamruaj, P.; Pirarat, N.; Kondo, H.; Hirono, I.; Rodkhum, C. Genomic comparison between pathogenic Streptococcus agalactiae isolated from Nile tilapia in Thailand and fish-derived ST7 strains. Infect. Genet. Evol. 2015, 36, 307–314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Kayansamruaj, P.; Pirarat, N.; Katagiri, T.; Hirono, I.; Rodkhum, C. Molecular characterization and virulence gene profiling of pathogenic Streptococcus agalactiae populations from tilapia (Oreochromis sp.) farms in Thailand. J. Vet. Diagn. Investig. 2014, 26, 488–495. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Suanyuk, N.; Kong, F.; Ko, D.; Gilbert, G.L.; Supamattaya, K. Occurrence of rare genotypes of Streptococcus agalactiae in cultured red tilapia Oreochromis sp. and Nile tilapia O. niloticus in Thailand—Relationship to human isolates? Aquaculture 2008, 284, 35–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Evans, J.J.; Bohnsack, J.F.; Klesius, P.H.; Whiting, A.A.; Garcia, J.C.; Shoemaker, C.A.; Takahashi, S. Phylogenetic relationships among Streptococcus agalactiae isolated from piscine, dolphin, bovine and human sources: A dolphin and piscine lineage associated with a fish epidemic in Kuwait is also associated with human neonatal infections in Japan. J. Med. Microbiol. 2008, 57, 1369–1376. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Jones, N.; Bohnsack, J.F.; Takahashi, S.; Oliver, K.A.; Chan, M.-S.; Kunst, F.; Glaser, P.; Rusniok, C.; Crook, D.W.; Harding, R.M. Multilocus sequence typing system for group B streptococcus. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2003, 41, 2530–2536. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Delannoy, C.M.; Zadoks, R.N.; Crumlish, M.; Rodgers, D.; Lainson, F.A.; Ferguson, H.; Turnbull, J.; Fontaine, M.C. Genomic comparison of virulent and non-virulent Streptococcus agalactiae in fish. J. Fish Dis. 2016, 39, 13–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Delannoy, C.M.; Crumlish, M.; Fontaine, M.C.; Pollock, J.; Foster, G.; Dagleish, M.P.; Turnbull, J.F.; Zadoks, R.N. Human Streptococcus agalactiae strains in aquatic mammals and fish. BMC Microbiol. 2013, 13, 41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Kayansamruaj, P.; Soontara, C.; Unajak, S.; Dong, H.T.; Rodkhum, C.; Kondo, H.; Hirono, I.; Areechon, N. Comparative genomics inferred two distinct populations of piscine pathogenic Streptococcus agalactiae, serotype Ia ST7 and serotype III ST283, in Thailand and Vietnam. Genomics 2019, 111, 1657–1667. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Kannika, K.; Pisuttharachai, D.; Srisapoome, P.; Wongtavatchai, J.; Kondo, H.; Hirono, I.; Unajak, S.; Areechon, N. Molecular serotyping, virulence gene profiling and pathogenicity of Streptococcus agalactiae isolated from tilapia farms in Thailand by multiplex PCR. J. Appl. Microbiol. 2017, 122, 1497–1507. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Gabriel, N.N.; Abasubong, K.P.; Erasmus, V.N.; Kamble, M.T. Sustainable Feed Ingredients and Additives for Aquaculture Farming; Springer: Singapore, 2024. [Google Scholar]
  19. Pepi, M.; Focardi, S. Antibiotic-resistant bacteria in aquaculture and climate change: A challenge for health in the Mediterranean area. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2021, 18, 5723. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Kamble, M.T.; Chavan, B.R.; Ataguba, G.; Azpeitia, T.; Medhe, S.; Jain, S.; Jadhav, R. Application of Moringa oleifera for development of sustainable and biosecure aquaculture. Aquac. Indones. 2015, 15, 64–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Kamble, M.T.; Soowannayan, C.; Chaicherd, S.; Medhe, S.V.; Rudtanatip, T.; Pissuwan, D.; Wongprasert, K. Bimetallic nanoparticles with sulfated galactan eliminate Vibrio parahaemolyticus in shrimp Penaeus vannamei. Fish Shellfish Immunol. 2024, 151, 109753. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Kamble, M.T.; Salin, K.R.; Chavan, B.R.; Medhe, S.V.; Thompson, K.D.; Pirarat, N. Length-weight relationship and condition factor of Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus) fed diets supplemented with guava and star gooseberry leaf extract. F1000Research 2024, 13, 540. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Trullàs, C.; Sewaka, M.; Rodkhum, C.; Chansue, N.; Boonanuntanasarn, S.; Kamble, M.T.; Pirarat, N. Effects of jerusalem artichoke (Helianthus tuberosus) as a prebiotic supplement in the diet of red tilapia (Oreochromis spp.). Animals 2022, 12, 2882. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Subramanian, R.; Zaini Asmawi, M.; Sadikun, A. A bitter plant with a sweet future? A comprehensive review of an oriental medicinal plant: Andrographis paniculata. Phytochem. Rev. 2012, 11, 39–75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Chen, L.; Deng, H.; Cui, H.; Fang, J.; Zuo, Z.; Deng, J.; Li, Y.; Wang, X.; Zhao, L. Inflammatory responses and inflammation-associated diseases in organs. Oncotarget 2017, 9, 7204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Subash, K. In silico pharmacokinetic and toxicological properties prediction of bioactive compounds from Andrographis paniculata. Natl. J. Physiol. Pharm. Pharmacol. 2020, 10, 537–542. [Google Scholar]
  27. Lapmanee, S.; Rimsueb, N.; Bunwatcharaphansakun, P.; Namdee, K.; Wongchitrat, P.; Bhubhanil, S.; Supkamonseni, N.; Charoenphon, N.; Inchan, A.; Saenmuangchin, R. Oral andrographolide loaded lipid nanocarriers alleviate stress behaviors and hippocampal damage in TNF alpha induced neuroinflammatory mice. Sci. Rep. 2025, 15, 11939. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Dafur, G.S.; Harun, A.; Kub, T.N.T.; Bakar, R.A.; Harun, A. A Systematic Review on the Antimicrobial Activity of Andrographolide. J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2024, 35, e2408028. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Xue, B.; Li, H.; Gao, S.; Quan, Y.; Wang, Y.; Yi, L.; Wang, Y. Andrographolide reverses the susceptibility of Streptococcus suis to aminoglycoside antibiotics by proton motive force. BMC Vet. Res. 2025, 21, 63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Basha, K.A.; Raman, R.P.; Prasad, K.P.; Kumar, K.; Nilavan, E.; Kumar, S. Effect of dietary supplemented andrographolide on growth, non-specific immune parameters and resistance against Aeromonas hydrophila in Labeo rohita (Hamilton). Fish Shellfish Immunol. 2013, 35, 1433–1441. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Yan, Y.; Fang, L.; Du, G. Andrographolide. In Natural Small Molecule Drugs from Plants; Springer: Singapore, 2018; Volume 1, pp. 357–362. [Google Scholar]
  32. Songvut, P.; Boonyarattanasoonthorn, T.; Nuengchamnong, N.; Junsai, T.; Kongratanapasert, T.; Supannapan, K.; Khemawoot, P. Enhancing oral bioavailability of andrographolide using solubilizing agents and bioenhancer: Comparative pharmacokinetics of Andrographis paniculata formulations in beagle dogs. Pharm. Biol. 2024, 62, 183–194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Yostawonkul, J.; Kitiyodom, S.; Kamble, M.T.; Supchukun, K.; Saengkrit, N.; Sukkarun, P.; Medhe, S.V.; Thompson, K.D.; Boonrungsiman, S.; Temisak, S. Immersion of nanostructured lipid carriers loaded with 17-alpha methyltestosterone for masculinization of red tilapia (Oreochromis sp.). Aquaculture 2024, 586, 740780. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Yostawonkul, J.; Kitiyodom, S.; Supchukun, K.; Thumrongsiri, N.; Saengkrit, N.; Pinpimai, K.; Hajitou, A.; Thompson, K.D.; Rattanapinyopituk, K.; Maita, M.; et al. Masculinization of red tilapia (Oreochromis spp.) using 17α-methyltestosterone-loaded alkyl polyglucosides integrated into nanostructured lipid carriers. Animals 2023, 13, 1364. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Kaewmalun, S.; Yata, T.; Kitiyodom, S.; Yostawonkul, J.; Namdee, K.; Kamble, M.T.; Pirarat, N. Clove oil-nanostructured lipid carriers: A platform of herbal anesthetics in whiteleg shrimp (Penaeus vannamei). Foods 2022, 11, 3162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Yostawonkul, J.; Kamble, M.T.; Sakuna, K.; Madyod, S.; Sukkarun, P.; Medhe, S.V.; Rodkhum, C.; Pirarat, N.; Sewaka, M. Effects of Mangosteen (Garcinia mangostana) peel extract loaded in nanoemulsion on growth performance, immune response, and disease resistance of Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus) against Aeromonas veronii infection. Animals 2023, 13, 1798. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Kamble, M.T.; Rudtanatip, T.; Soowannayan, C.; Nambunruang, B.; Medhe, S.V.; Wongprasert, K. Depolymerized fractions of sulfated galactans extracted from Gracilaria fisheri and their antibacterial activity against Vibrio parahaemolyticus and Vibrio harveyi. Mar. Drugs 2022, 20, 469. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Pirarat, N.; Pinpimai, K.; Chankow, K.; Malila, K.; Chansue, N.; Niyomtham, W.; Rodkhum, C. In vitro efficacy of human-derived probiotic, Lactobacillus rhamnosus against pathogenic bacteria in fish and frogs. Thai J. Vet. Med. 2015, 39, 305–310. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Pauly, D. Some Simple Methods for the Assessment of Tropical Fish Stocks; Food & Agriculture Organization: Rome, Italy, 1983. [Google Scholar]
  40. Froese, R. Cube law, condition factor and weight–length relationships: History, meta-analysis and recommendations. J. Appl. Ichthyol. 2006, 22, 241–253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Le Cren, E.D. The length-weight relationship and seasonal cycle in gonad weight and condition in the perch (Perca fluviatilis). J. Anim. Ecol. 1951, 20, 201–219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Amend, D.F. Potency testing of fish vaccines. Fish Biol. Serodiagn. Vaccines 1981, 49, 447–454. [Google Scholar]
  43. Luque-Alcaraz, A.G.; Maldonado-Arriola, J.A.; Hernández-Abril, P.A.; Álvarez-Ramos, M.E.; Hernández-Téllez, C.N. Zein nanoparticles loaded with Vitis vinifera L. grape pomace extract: Synthesis and characterization. Nanomaterials 2025, 15, 539. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Wang, K.; Zhang, Q.-j.; Miao, Y.-L.; Luo, S.-Q.; Wang, H.-C.; Zhang, W.-P. Effect of solid lipid’s structure on nanostructured lipid carriers encapsulated with sun filter: Characterisation, photo-stability and in vitro release. J. Microencapsul. 2017, 34, 104–110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Lúcio, M.; Giannino, N.; Barreira, S.; Catita, J.; Gonçalves, H.; Ribeiro, A.; Fernandes, E.; Carvalho, I.; Pinho, H.; Cerqueira, F. Nanostructured lipid carriers enriched hydrogels for skin topical administration of quercetin and omega-3 fatty acid. Pharmaceutics 2023, 15, 2078. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Ortiz, A.C.; Yañez, O.; Salas-Huenuleo, E.; Morales, J.O. Development of a nanostructured lipid carrier (NLC) by a low-energy method, comparison of release kinetics and molecular dynamics simulation. Pharmaceutics 2021, 13, 531. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Gomes, A.; Sobral, P.J.d.A. Plant protein-based delivery systems: An emerging approach for increasing the efficacy of lipophilic bioactive compounds. Molecules 2021, 27, 60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Maeki, M.; Uno, S.; Niwa, A.; Okada, Y.; Tokeshi, M. Microfluidic technologies and devices for lipid nanoparticle-based RNA delivery. J. Control. Release 2022, 344, 80–96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. De, A.K.; Bera, T. Analytical method development, validation and stability studies by RP-HPLC method for simultaneous estimation of andrographolide and curcumin in co-encapsulated nanostructured lipid carrier drug delivery system. Int. J. Appl. Pharm. 2021, 13, 73–86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Indrati, O.; Martien, R.; Rohman, A.; Nugroho, A.K. Development of nanoemulsion-based hydrogel containing andrographolide: Physical properties and stability evaluation. J. Pharm. Bioallied Sci. 2020, 12, S816–S820. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  51. Surini, S.; Nastiti, P.D.; Putri, A.R.; Putri, K.S. Formulation of andrographolide transfersomes gel for transdermal delivery: A preliminary study. Int. J. Appl. Pharm. 2020, 12, 187–191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Vairo, C.; Basas, J.; Pastor, M.; Palau, M.; Gomis, X.; Almirante, B.; Gainza, E.; Hernandez, R.; Igartua, M.; Gavaldà, J. In vitro and in vivo antimicrobial activity of sodium colistimethate and amikacin-loaded nanostructured lipid carriers (NLC). Nanomed. Nanotechnol. Biol. Med. 2020, 29, 102259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Ma, Q.; Wang, G.; Li, N.; Wang, X.; Kang, X.; Mao, Y.; Wang, G. Insights into the effects and mechanism of andrographolide-mediated recovery of susceptibility of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus to β-Lactam Antibiotics. Microbiol. Spectr. 2023, 11, e0297822. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Yu, T.; Jiang, X.; Xu, X.; Jiang, C.; Kang, R.; Jiang, X. Andrographolide inhibits biofilm and virulence in listeria monocytogenes as a quorum-sensing inhibitor. Molecules 2022, 27, 3234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Álvarez-Martínez, F.J.; Barrajón-Catalán, E.; Herranz-López, M.; Micol, V. Antibacterial plant compounds, extracts and essential oils: An updated review on their effects and putative mechanisms of action. Phytomedicine 2021, 90, 153626. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Cé, R.; Pacheco, B.Z.; Ciocheta, T.M.; Barbosa, F.S.; de CS Alves, A.; Dallemole, D.R.; Lavayen, V.; Guterres, S.S.; Steppe, M.; Pohlmann, A.R. Antibacterial activity against Gram-positive bacteria using fusidic acid-loaded lipid-core nanocapsules. React. Funct. Polym. 2021, 162, 104876. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Alalaiwe, A.; Wang, P.-W.; Lu, P.-L.; Chen, Y.-P.; Fang, J.-Y.; Yang, S.-C. Synergistic anti-MRSA activity of cationic nanostructured lipid carriers in combination with oxacillin for cutaneous application. Front. Microbiol. 2018, 9, 1493. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Manan, A.; Aqib, A.I.; Shahbaz, A.; Khan, S.R.; Akram, K.; Majeed, H.; Muneer, A.; Murtaza, M.; Afrasiab, M.; Merola, C. Modification of the drug resistance of emerging milk-borne pathogens through sodium alginate-based antibiotics and nanoparticles. Front. Vet. Sci. 2023, 10, 1130130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  59. Talib, A.; Manzoor, K.; Ijaz, A.; Adnan, F.; Javed, F.; Khan, A. Encapsulated virgin coconut oil as a nanoscale in vitro solution against multiple drug resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Micro Nano Lett. 2021, 16, 9–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Syukri, Y.; Martien, R.; Lukitaningsih, E.; Nugroho, A.E. Novel Self-Nano Emulsifying Drug Delivery System (SNEDDS) of andrographolide isolated from Andrographis paniculata Nees: Characterization, in-vitro and in-vivo assessment. J. Drug Deliv. Sci. Technol. 2018, 47, 514–520. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Sridharan, B.; Lee, M.-J. Current developments in nano/micro-formulations for enhanced delivery and bioactivity of andrographolide. Mater. Today: Proc. 2021, 45, 4746–4752. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Abdel-Tawwab, M.; Eissa, E.-S.H.; Tawfik, W.A.; Abd Elnabi, H.E.; Saadony, S.; Bazina, W.K.; Ahmed, R.A. Dietary curcumin nanoparticles promoted the performance, antioxidant activity, and humoral immunity, and modulated the hepatic and intestinal histology of Nile tilapia fingerlings. Fish Physiol. Biochem. 2022, 48, 585–601. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Abdel-Tawwab, M.; Razek, N.A.; Abdel-Rahman, A.M. Immunostimulatory effect of dietary chitosan nanoparticles on the performance of Nile tilapia, Oreochromis niloticus (L.). Fish Shellfish Immunol. 2019, 88, 254–258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Ashry, A.M.; Hassan, A.M.; Habiba, M.M.; El-Zayat, A.; El-Sharnouby, M.E.; Sewilam, H.; Dawood, M.A. The impact of dietary curcumin on the growth performance, intestinal antibacterial capacity, and haemato-biochemical parameters of gilthead seabream (Sparus aurata). Animals 2021, 11, 1779. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Yang, B.; Dong, Y.; Wang, F.; Zhang, Y. Nanoformulations to enhance the bioavailability and physiological functions of polyphenols. Molecules 2020, 25, 4613. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. Chari, F.H.; Akrami, R.; Ghelichi, A.; Ebrahimi, P. The effect of Lavandula officinalis nanoemulsion on growth performance, body composition, haematology and immunity parameters of Oncorhynchus mykiss. J. Appl. Anim. Res. 2020, 48, 340–347. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Abd El-Hamid, M.I.; Ibrahim, S.M.; Eldemery, F.; El-Mandrawy, S.A.; Metwally, A.S.; Khalifa, E.; Elnahriry, S.S.; Ibrahim, D. Dietary cinnamaldehyde nanoemulsion boosts growth and transcriptomes of antioxidant and immune related genes to fight Streptococcus agalactiae infection in Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus). Fish Shellfish Immunol. 2021, 113, 96–105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  68. Moniruzzaman, M.; Min, T. Curcumin, curcumin nanoparticles and curcumin nanospheres: A review on their pharmacodynamics based on monogastric farm animal, poultry and fish nutrition. Pharmaceutics 2020, 12, 447. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  69. Eissa, E.-S.H.; Alaidaroos, B.A.; Jastaniah, S.D.; Munir, M.B.; Shafi, M.E.; Abd El-Aziz, Y.M.; Bazina, W.K.; Ibrahim, S.b.; Eissa, M.E.; Paolucci, M. Dietary effects of nano curcumin on growth performances, body composition, blood parameters and histopathological alternation in red tilapia (Oreochromis sp.) challenged with Aspergillus flavus. Fishes 2023, 8, 208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Ibrahim, D.; Arisha, A.H.; Khater, S.I.; Gad, W.M.; Hassan, Z.; Abou-Khadra, S.H.; Mohamed, D.I.; Ahmed Ismail, T.; Gad, S.A.; Eid, S.A. Impact of omega-3 fatty acids nano-formulation on growth, antioxidant potential, fillet quality, immunity, autophagy-related genes and Aeromonas hydrophila resistance in Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus). Antioxidants 2022, 11, 1523. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  71. Dube, E. Nanoparticle-enhanced fish feed: Benefits and challenges. Fishes 2024, 9, 322. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Yousefi, M.; Adineh, H.; Hoseini, S.M.; Hashemianfar, S.A.M.; Kulikov, E.V.; Petukhov, N.V.; Ryzhova, T.A. Effects of Laurus nobilis essential oil nano-particles on growth performance, antioxidant and immune responses to bacterial infection in Nile tilapia, Oreochromis niloticus. Aquaculture 2025, 596, 741821. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Goodrich, H.R.; Clark, T.D. Why do some fish grow faster than others? Fish Fish. 2023, 24, 796–811. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Shi, Y.; Zhong, L.; Liu, Y.; Zhang, J.; Lv, Z.; Li, Y.; Hu, Y. Effects of dietary andrographolide levels on growth performance, antioxidant capacity, intestinal immune function and microbioma of rice field eel (Monopterus albus). Animals 2020, 10, 1744. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  75. Elmowafy, M.; Al-Sanea, M.M. Nanostructured lipid carriers (NLCs) as drug delivery platform: Advances in formulation and delivery strategies. Saudi Pharm. J. 2021, 29, 999–1012. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  76. Noimoon, P.; Chitmanat, C. Efficacy of Dietary Herbal Extract and Nano-Quercetin on Growth, Innate Immune Responses, Antioxidant and Resistance of Nile Tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus) Against Streptococcus agalactiae Infection; Maejo University: Chiang Mai, Thailand, 2021. [Google Scholar]
  77. Elabd, H.; Mahboub, H.H.; Salem, S.M.; Abdelwahab, A.M.; Alwutayd, K.M.; Shaalan, M.; Ismail, S.H.; Abdelfattah, A.M.; Khalid, A.; Mansour, A.T. Nano-Curcumin/Chitosan modulates growth, biochemical, immune, and antioxidative profiles, and the expression of related genes in Nile tilapia, Oreochromis niloticus. Fishes 2023, 8, 333. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Abdelghany, M.F.; El-Sawy, H.B.; Abd El-hameed, S.A.; Khames, M.K.; Abdel-Latif, H.M.; Naiel, M.A. Effects of dietary Nannochloropsis oculata on growth performance, serum biochemical parameters, immune responses, and resistance against Aeromonas veronii challenge in Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus). Fish Shellfish Immunol. 2020, 107, 277–288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  79. Sherif, A.; Alsokary, E.; Esam, H. Assessment of titanium dioxide nanoparticle as treatment of Aeromonas hydrophila infection in Oreochromis niloticus. J. Hell. Vet. Med. Soc. 2019, 70, 1697–1706. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Sherif, A.H.; Kassab, A.S. Multidrug-resistant Aeromonas bacteria prevalence in Nile tilapia broodstock. BMC Microbiol. 2023, 23, 80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  81. Khan, M.; Hossain, M.; Khan, M.; Ali, M.; Aktar, S.; Moniruzzaman, M.; Khan, M. Influence of nanoparticle-based nano-nutrients on the growth performance and physiological parameters in tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus). RSC Adv. 2020, 10, 29918–29922. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  82. Ibrahim, R.E.; Amer, S.A.; Farroh, K.Y.; Al-Gabri, N.A.; Ahmed, A.I.; El-Araby, D.A.; Ahmed, S.A. The effects of chitosan-vitamin C nanocomposite supplementation on the growth performance, antioxidant status, immune response, and disease resistance of Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus) fingerlings. Aquaculture 2021, 534, 736269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Roy, P.; Das, S.; Auddy, R.G.; Mukherjee, A. Engineered andrographolide nanosystems for smart recovery in hepatotoxic conditions. Int. J. Nanomed. 2014, 9, 4723–4735. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  84. Kamble, M.T.; Chaiyapechara, S.; Salin, K.R.; Bunphimpapha, P.; Chavan, B.R.; Bhujel, R.C.; Medhe, S.V.; Kettawan, A.; Thiyajai, P.; Thompson, K.D.; et al. Guava and Star gooseberry leaf extracts improve growth performance, innate immunity, intestinal microbial community, and disease resistance in Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus) against Aeromonas hydrophila. Aquac. Rep. 2024, 35, 101947. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Das, S.; Pradhan, G.K.; Das, S.; Nath, D.; Saha, K.D. Enhanced protective activity of nano formulated andrographolide against arsenic induced liver damage. Chem. -Biol. Interact. 2015, 242, 281–289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  86. Neamatallah, T.; Malebari, A.M.; Alamoudi, A.J.; Nazreen, S.; Alam, M.M.; Bin-Melaih, H.H.; Abuzinadah, O.A.; Badr-Eldin, S.M.; Alhassani, G.; Makki, L. Andrographolide nanophytosomes exhibit enhanced cellular delivery and pro-apoptotic activities in HepG2 liver cancer cells. Drug Deliv. 2023, 30, 2174209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  87. Mandal, D.D.; Mandal, T.; Hazra, M. Strategic approach in hepatic delivery of andrographolide: Key challenges and new insights. J. Herb. Med. 2020, 24, 100411. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Abdel-Ghany, H.M.; El-Sisy, D.M.; Salem, M.E.-S. A comparative study of effects of curcumin and its nanoparticles on the growth, immunity and heat stress resistance of Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus). Sci. Rep. 2023, 13, 2523. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  89. Chimsook, T. Formulation of Nanostructured Lipid Carriers Loaded with Algae Extract: A Detailed Study of Preparation and Evaluation of Antioxidant Potential for Stabilization of Fish Oil. Appl. Mech. Mater. 2015, 799, 42–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Rodrigues, A.T.; Mansano, C.F.; Khan, K.U.; Nascimento, T.M.; Boaratti, A.Z.; Sakomura, N.K.; Fernandes, J.B. Ideal profile of essential amino acids for Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus) in the finishing growth phase. Aquac. Res. 2020, 51, 4724–4735. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Neu, D.; Boscolo, W.; Zaminhan, M.; Almeida, F.; Sary, C.; Furuya, W. Growth performance, biochemical responses, and skeletal muscle development of juvenile Nile tilapia, Oreochromis niloticus, fed with increasing levels of arginine. J. World Aquac. Soc. 2016, 47, 248–259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Farhad, F.B.; Hashem, S.; Rana, K.S.; Salam, M. Growth performance and hematological responses of silver barb (Barbonymus gonionotus bleeker, 1850) fingerlings to dietary blanched moringa (Moringa oleifera lam.) leaf meal as a substitute of soybean meal. Heliyon 2023, 9, e13552. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  93. Aiyelari, T.A.; Chaudhry, A.S. Plant protein-based diets can replace a fish meal-based diet for sustainable growth and body composition of zebrafish. bioRxiv 2020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Pratiwy, F.M.; Kohbara, J.; AB, S. Effectiveness of Sargassum meal as feed additive on growth performance of nile tilapia, Oreochromis niloticus. Aquac. Sci. 2018, 66, 25–31. [Google Scholar]
  95. Ighwela, K.A.; Ahmed, A.B.; Abol-Munafi, A. Condition factor as an indicator of growth and feeding intensity of Nile tilapia fingerlings (Oreochromis niloticus) feed on different levels of maltose. Am.-Eurasian J. Agric. Environ. Sci. 2011, 11, 559–563. [Google Scholar]
  96. Nasr-Eldahan, S.; Nabil-Adam, A.; Shreadah, M.A.; Maher, A.M.; El-Sayed Ali, T. A review article on nanotechnology in aquaculture sustainability as a novel tool in fish disease control. Aquac. Int. 2021, 29, 1459–1480. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  97. Luis, A.I.; Campos, E.V.; De Oliveira, J.L.; Guilger-Casagrande, M.; De Lima, R.; Castanha, R.F.; De Castro, V.L.; Fraceto, L.F. Zein nanoparticles impregnated with eugenol and garlic essential oils for treating fish pathogens. ACS Omega 2020, 5, 15557–15566. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  98. Salam, H.S.H.; Mohamed, W.M.; Aziz, S.A.A.A.; Mohammed, A.N.; Korni, F.M. Prevention of motile Aeromonas septicemia in Nile tilapia, Oreochromis niloticus, using thyme essential oil and its nano-emlusion. Aquac. Int. 2021, 29, 2065–2084. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. El-Ekiaby, W.T. Basil oil nanoemulsion formulation and its antimicrobial activity against fish pathogen and enhance disease resistance against Aeromonas hydrophila in cultured Nile tilapia. Egypt. J. Aquac. 2019, 9, 13–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Characterization of AND-NLC. (A) Size distribution by intensity measured using dynamic light scattering (DLS). (B,C) Morphology of AND-NLC observed by transmission electron microscopy (TEM) at 200 nm and 100 nm scale bars, respectively. (D) In vitro release profile of andrographolide from NLCs over time.
Figure 1. Characterization of AND-NLC. (A) Size distribution by intensity measured using dynamic light scattering (DLS). (B,C) Morphology of AND-NLC observed by transmission electron microscopy (TEM) at 200 nm and 100 nm scale bars, respectively. (D) In vitro release profile of andrographolide from NLCs over time.
Animals 15 02117 g001
Figure 2. FTIR spectra of andrographolide (AND, bottom spectrum) and andrographolide loaded in nanostructured lipid carriers (AND-NLC, top spectrum). Characteristic shifts in functional group peaks confirm the interaction of AND with the lipid matrix, indicating successful encapsulation and potential enhancement in stability and bioavailability.
Figure 2. FTIR spectra of andrographolide (AND, bottom spectrum) and andrographolide loaded in nanostructured lipid carriers (AND-NLC, top spectrum). Characteristic shifts in functional group peaks confirm the interaction of AND with the lipid matrix, indicating successful encapsulation and potential enhancement in stability and bioavailability.
Animals 15 02117 g002
Figure 3. Growth performance and feed utilization parameters of Nile tilapia fed diets supplemented with control, andrographolide (AND), andrographolide-loaded nanostructured lipid carriers (AND-NLC), and nanostructured lipid carriers (NLC) for 30 and 60 days. (AC) Final weight (FW), weight gain (WG), and specific growth rate (SGR), respectively. (DF) Feed intake (FI), feed conversion ratio (FCR), and protein efficiency ratio (PER), respectively. Different lowercase superscripts indicate significant differences between treatments at each time point. Uppercase superscripts indicate significant differences over time between treatments.
Figure 3. Growth performance and feed utilization parameters of Nile tilapia fed diets supplemented with control, andrographolide (AND), andrographolide-loaded nanostructured lipid carriers (AND-NLC), and nanostructured lipid carriers (NLC) for 30 and 60 days. (AC) Final weight (FW), weight gain (WG), and specific growth rate (SGR), respectively. (DF) Feed intake (FI), feed conversion ratio (FCR), and protein efficiency ratio (PER), respectively. Different lowercase superscripts indicate significant differences between treatments at each time point. Uppercase superscripts indicate significant differences over time between treatments.
Animals 15 02117 g003
Figure 4. Pearson correlation heatmap showing relationships among nanoparticle characteristics, antibacterial activity, growth, feed utilization, physiological indices, and disease resistance parameters in Nile tilapia. Strong positive and negative correlations are indicated by color intensity and direction. Treatment (TRT); nanoparticle characteristics: particle size (size), polydispersity index (PDI), and zeta potential (ZP); antibacterial activity: inhibition zone (IZ), minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC), and minimum bactericidal concentration (MBC); growth performance: final weight (FW), final length (FL), weight gain (WG), and specific growth rate (SGR); feed utilization: feed intake (FI), feed consumption ratio (FCR), protein efficiency ratio (PER); physiological indices: hepatosomatic index (HSI), length–weight relationship (LWR), and relative condition factor (Kn); and disease resistance: mortality (M), survival (S), and relative percent survival (RPS) in Nile tilapia.
Figure 4. Pearson correlation heatmap showing relationships among nanoparticle characteristics, antibacterial activity, growth, feed utilization, physiological indices, and disease resistance parameters in Nile tilapia. Strong positive and negative correlations are indicated by color intensity and direction. Treatment (TRT); nanoparticle characteristics: particle size (size), polydispersity index (PDI), and zeta potential (ZP); antibacterial activity: inhibition zone (IZ), minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC), and minimum bactericidal concentration (MBC); growth performance: final weight (FW), final length (FL), weight gain (WG), and specific growth rate (SGR); feed utilization: feed intake (FI), feed consumption ratio (FCR), protein efficiency ratio (PER); physiological indices: hepatosomatic index (HSI), length–weight relationship (LWR), and relative condition factor (Kn); and disease resistance: mortality (M), survival (S), and relative percent survival (RPS) in Nile tilapia.
Animals 15 02117 g004
Figure 5. Hepatosomatic index (HSI) of Nile tilapia fed diets supplemented with control, andrographolide (AND), andrographolide-loaded nanostructured lipid carriers (AND-NLC) and nanostructured lipid carriers (NLC) for 30 and 60 days. Different lowercase superscripts indicate significant differences between treatments at each time point. Uppercase superscripts indicate significant differences over time between treatments.
Figure 5. Hepatosomatic index (HSI) of Nile tilapia fed diets supplemented with control, andrographolide (AND), andrographolide-loaded nanostructured lipid carriers (AND-NLC) and nanostructured lipid carriers (NLC) for 30 and 60 days. Different lowercase superscripts indicate significant differences between treatments at each time point. Uppercase superscripts indicate significant differences over time between treatments.
Animals 15 02117 g005
Figure 6. Log-transformed length–weight relationship and regression equations of Nile tilapia fed different diets for 60 days. (AD) control, andrographolide (AND), andrographolide-loaded nanostructured lipid carriers (AND-NLC) and nanostructured lipid carriers (NLC).
Figure 6. Log-transformed length–weight relationship and regression equations of Nile tilapia fed different diets for 60 days. (AD) control, andrographolide (AND), andrographolide-loaded nanostructured lipid carriers (AND-NLC) and nanostructured lipid carriers (NLC).
Animals 15 02117 g006
Figure 7. Disease resistance outcomes following S. agalactiae ENC06 challenge in Nile tilapia. (A) Kaplan–Meier survival curves showing cumulative survival across diet groups. (B) Cox proportional hazards model estimating relative mortality risk across treatments. Different lowercase superscripts indicate significant differences between treatments.
Figure 7. Disease resistance outcomes following S. agalactiae ENC06 challenge in Nile tilapia. (A) Kaplan–Meier survival curves showing cumulative survival across diet groups. (B) Cox proportional hazards model estimating relative mortality risk across treatments. Different lowercase superscripts indicate significant differences between treatments.
Animals 15 02117 g007
Table 1. Physicochemical properties of andrographolide (AND) loaded in nanostructured lipid carriers (NLC).
Table 1. Physicochemical properties of andrographolide (AND) loaded in nanostructured lipid carriers (NLC).
FormulationSize (nm)Polydispersity IndexZeta Potential (mV)Encapsulation Efficiency (%)
NLC168.0 ± 2.20.262 ± 0.028−21.33 ± 1.0ND
AND-NLC189.6 ± 3.20.159 ± 0.038−20.0 ± 0.590.58 ± 0.13
Values were the mean ± SD of triplicate samples. ND: not detected.
Table 2. Inhibition zone diameter (IZD), minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC), and minimum bactericidal concentration (MBC) of andrographolide (AND) and andrographolide-loaded nanostructured lipid carriers (AND-NLC) against S. agalactiae strains (FPrA02, FNA07, ENC06).
Table 2. Inhibition zone diameter (IZD), minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC), and minimum bactericidal concentration (MBC) of andrographolide (AND) and andrographolide-loaded nanostructured lipid carriers (AND-NLC) against S. agalactiae strains (FPrA02, FNA07, ENC06).
FormulationIZD (mm)MIC (ppm)MBC (ppm)
FPrA02FNA07ENC06FPrA02FNA07ENC06FPrA02FNA07ENC06
AND6 ± 0 a6 ± 0 a6 ± 0 a100010001000200020002000
AND-NLC13 ± 2 b13 ± 2 b14 ± 1 b>2000>2000>2000>2000>2000>2000
Values were the mean ± SD of triplicate samples. Different lowercase superscripts in each column indicate significant differences between treatments.
Table 3. Length–weight relationship, growth pattern, and relative condition factor of Nile tilapia fed diets supplemented with control, andrographolide (AND), andrographolide-loaded nanostructured lipid carriers (AND-NLC), and nanostructured lipid carriers (NLC) for 60 days.
Table 3. Length–weight relationship, growth pattern, and relative condition factor of Nile tilapia fed diets supplemented with control, andrographolide (AND), andrographolide-loaded nanostructured lipid carriers (AND-NLC), and nanostructured lipid carriers (NLC) for 60 days.
ParametersControlANDAND-NLCNLC
N90909090
LMin-Max (cm)10.0–1511.0–14.811.0–15.811.2–14.5
Wmin-max (g)19.8–66.426.1–65.025.0–81.227.3–57.4
a−1.378−1.747−2.081−1.287
b2.6973.0363.3502.619
SE (b)0.1030.1170.0900.095
CI (b)2.493–2.9012.803–3.2693.170–3.5302.424–2.813
r0.9420.9400.9690.944
R20.8870.8840.9400.890
p0.0010.0010.0010.001
t-test sig0.0010.0010.0010.001
Growth behaviorNegative allometryPositive allometryPositive allometryNegative allometry
Kn1.195 a1.229 a1.052 b0.971 c
Min-Max0.962–1.4521.016–1.4630.918–1.2360.876–1.188
SE0.0100.0110.0080.013
N: sample size; L: length in centimeters; W: weight in grams; Min/Max: minimum and maximum values; a: intercept of the regression equation; b: slope; SE: standard error; CI (b): confidence interval for the slope; r: correlation coefficient; R2: coefficient of determination; p: statistical significance (considered significant at p < 0.05); Kn: relative condition factor. A t-test was used to assess whether the slope (b) significantly deviated from the expected value of 3. The growth pattern was interpreted based on the value of b. Different lowercase superscripts in the Kn row indicate significant differences between treatments.
Table 4. The cumulative mortality and relative percent survival (RPS) of Nile tilapia fed diets supplemented with control, andrographolide (AND), andrographolide-loaded nanostructured lipid carriers (AND-NLC), and nanostructured lipid carriers (NLC) for 60 days after being challenged with S. agalactiae ENC06.
Table 4. The cumulative mortality and relative percent survival (RPS) of Nile tilapia fed diets supplemented with control, andrographolide (AND), andrographolide-loaded nanostructured lipid carriers (AND-NLC), and nanostructured lipid carriers (NLC) for 60 days after being challenged with S. agalactiae ENC06.
TreatmentsMortality (%)Survival (%)RPS (%)
Infected control77.8 ± 2.2 a22.2 ± 2.2 a0.0
Negative control15.5 ± 2.2 c84.5 ± 2.2 c80.0 ± 2.6 c
AND35.6 ± 4.4 b64.4 ± 4.4 b54.1 ± 6.4 b
AND-NLC26.7 ± 3.8 bc73.3 ± 3.8 bc65.6 ± 4.9 bc
NLC75.53 ± 2.2 a24.5 ± 2.2 a2.5 ± 0.8 a
Values were the mean ± SD of triplicate samples. Different lowercase superscripts in each column indicate significant differences between treatments.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Kengkittipat, W.; Kamble, M.T.; Kitiyodom, S.; Yostawonkul, J.; Sawatphakdee, G.; Thompson, K.D.; Medhe, S.V.; Pirarat, N. Effects of Andrographolide-Loaded Nanostructured Lipid Carriers on Growth, Feed Efficiency, and Resistance to Streptococcus agalactiae in Nile Tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus). Animals 2025, 15, 2117. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani15142117

AMA Style

Kengkittipat W, Kamble MT, Kitiyodom S, Yostawonkul J, Sawatphakdee G, Thompson KD, Medhe SV, Pirarat N. Effects of Andrographolide-Loaded Nanostructured Lipid Carriers on Growth, Feed Efficiency, and Resistance to Streptococcus agalactiae in Nile Tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus). Animals. 2025; 15(14):2117. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani15142117

Chicago/Turabian Style

Kengkittipat, Warut, Manoj Tukaram Kamble, Sirikorn Kitiyodom, Jakarwan Yostawonkul, Gotchagorn Sawatphakdee, Kim D. Thompson, Seema Vijay Medhe, and Nopadon Pirarat. 2025. "Effects of Andrographolide-Loaded Nanostructured Lipid Carriers on Growth, Feed Efficiency, and Resistance to Streptococcus agalactiae in Nile Tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus)" Animals 15, no. 14: 2117. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani15142117

APA Style

Kengkittipat, W., Kamble, M. T., Kitiyodom, S., Yostawonkul, J., Sawatphakdee, G., Thompson, K. D., Medhe, S. V., & Pirarat, N. (2025). Effects of Andrographolide-Loaded Nanostructured Lipid Carriers on Growth, Feed Efficiency, and Resistance to Streptococcus agalactiae in Nile Tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus). Animals, 15(14), 2117. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani15142117

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop