Next Article in Journal
Evaluation of the Urine Albumin-to-Creatinine Ratio (UAC) for Early Renal Disease: A Large-Scale Clinical Study in Cats
Previous Article in Journal
Genetic Diversity and Phylogenetic Relationships of Castor fiber birulai in Xinjiang, China, Revealed by Mitochondrial Cytb and D-loop Sequence Analyses
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Selection for Growth Performance in Oreochromis niloticus Across Different Aquatic Environments Using Growth Hormone Gene Polymorphisms

1
Aquaculture Division, National Institute of Oceanography and Fisheries, NIOF, Cairo 11516, Egypt
2
Department of Animal Husbandry and Animal Wealth Development, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Alexandria University, Alexandria 22758, Egypt
3
Genetics Department, Faculty of Agriculture, Menoufia University, Shibin El-Kom 6131567, Egypt
4
Fish Production Department, Faculty of Agriculture, Al-Azhar University, Cairo 11884, Egypt
5
Department of Integrative Agriculture, College of Agriculture and Veterinary Medicine, United Arab Emirates University, Al Ain P.O. Box 15551, United Arab Emirates
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Animals 2025, 15(14), 2097; https://doi.org/10.3390/ani15142097
Submission received: 8 June 2025 / Revised: 27 June 2025 / Accepted: 3 July 2025 / Published: 16 July 2025
(This article belongs to the Section Aquatic Animals)

Simple Summary

Nile tilapia is a widely farmed fish species in tropical aquaculture due to its high growth, adaptability, and palatability. The growing global demand for sustainable protein sources prioritizes the importance of enhancing the growth performance of Nile tilapia through selective breeding. This study focused on the naturally occurring genetic differences linked to the growth hormone gene and their association with body weight and length in three Egyptian wild Nile tilapia populations (Lake Brullus, El-Qanater El-Khairia, and Lake Nasser). Populations from Lake Nasser and El-Qanater El-Khairia showed the highest numbers of beneficial genetic markers and elevated body measurements. Furthermore, their offspring demonstrated improved early growth, immunity, and neural performance. These findings clarify the importance of using genetic information in Nile tilapia breeding strategies. This approach guarantees the long-term sustainability of aquaculture, particularly in developing countries where fish farming plays a critical role in food security and economic development.

Abstract

The current work focused on the molecular selection of Oreochromis niloticus with improved growth performance through marker-trait associations between SNPs within the growth hormone gene (GH) and growth performance. A total of 155 fish of the same age were collected from three locations (Lake Brullus (B), the River Nile at El-Qanater El-Khairia (Q), and Lake Nasser (A)). The selected individual progenies were evaluated through gene expression analysis for growth, inflammatory, nervous, and immune-related genes. A total of nine SNPs and three InDels were significantly associated with morphometric characteristics. The phenotypic variance (R2) of the detected SNPs ranged between 2.6% and 36%. The best populations were A and Q, as they recorded the best growth performance and harboured the highest number of SNPs and InDels, in addition to a significant increase in body weight and length. Furthermore, their progenies documented the most promising gene expression patterns of all tested genes. The current research highlights the importance of molecular selection and the potential use of population-specific SNPs in tilapia breeding programs.

1. Introduction

Aquaculture represents a promising solution for fulfilling the burgeoning demand for nutritious, affordable, and readily available animal protein [1,2]. The larval stage is considered the weakest link in aquaculture due to its elevated sensitivity and nutritional requirements, in addition to the undeveloped immune response [3,4]. Egypt is considered one of the cornerstones in the tropical aquaculture industry due to its ideal climatic conditions and proximity to the Nile River, which positively affect its economy and food security [5]. Selective breeding programs are essential for improving aquaculture and will result in production surpassing the limit of 100 million tons by 2027 [1]. This approach aims to solve enduring challenges in the field through the careful selection and breeding of individuals with superior traits, for instance, an accelerated growth rate, enhanced disease resistance and survival, elevated feed conversion efficiency, and high offspring quality (viability and resilience) [2,6,7,8,9].
Traditionally, selective breeding was based on visual phenotypic evaluation to select individuals with favorable traits as broodstocks for subsequent generations [10]. However, this technique faced several limitations, including bias, an elongated temporal span, and incompetence in polygenic trait selection [11]. Therefore, the shift toward marker-assisted selection (MAS) has emerged as a revolutionary approach to uncover the precise DNA sequences related to superior traits [12,13].
Polymorphisms in growth-related genes, including insulin-like growth factor I (IGFI), somatostatin (SST), insulin-like growth factor II (IGFII), and growth hormone (GH), are linked to variations in growth performance in fish. Polymorphisms within the promoter and/or exon regions create changes within the binding sites of transcription factors, significantly affecting gene expression [14,15,16,17,18]. GH is the cornerstone of the hypothalamic–pituitary–somatotropic (HPS) axis and affects a wide range of physiological activities related to somatic growth, including energy utilization, muscular development (hyperplasia and hypertrophy), food conversion efficiency, and regulation of sexual maturation and immunity [16,17,18,19].
MAS mainly utilizes different DNA markers in aquaculture, including simple sequence repeats (SSRs) and single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) [20,21,22,23]. Such DNA markers enable the identification of genetic variations linked to enhanced genetic performance [20,24]. SNPs are mutation-induced nucleotide substitutions, distributed throughout the genome (coding and noncoding regions); they can serve as biological markers, assisting in identifying genes linked to productive traits [25,26]. However, despite extensive use of MAS in aquaculture, there remains a limited understanding of how specific SNPs in growth-related genes translate into phenotypic and molecular outcomes in early progeny performance [18].
The Nile tilapia, Oreochromis niloticus, is a highly valued species in tropical aquaculture because of its resilience, rapid growth rate, high reproducibility, and widespread consumer acceptability [27]. Therefore, it has become a candidate for several genetic improvement programs worldwide, which resulted in producing the first genetically improved farmed tilapia (GIFT) program established by WorldFish in 1988 until the latest generation of the Genomar Supreme Tilapia (GST) program [1,17,18,28,29]. To date, the genetic pool of Egyptian Nile tilapia has contributed to the creation of eight genetically improved strains, which are now cultivated in more than 128 countries worldwide [30,31].
Although Egypt has made a substantial contribution to the global tilapia aquaculture industry, the genetic potential of its native Nile tilapia populations is still being underutilised. Hence, these populations represent hidden reservoirs of natural genetic diversity, particularly in geographically distinct aquatic ecosystems, which might house unique alleles associated with superior growth and resilience characteristics [27].
The current work represents a part of a currently running genetic improvement program for Nile tilapia, Oreochromis niloticus, at the National Institute of Oceanography and Fisheries, Egypt. This program is based on the screening and selection of wild Nile tilapia, Oreochromis niloticus, populations from three dispersed geographic locations, including Lake Brullus (B) in north Egypt, El-Qanater El-Khairia (Q) an intermediate Egyptian locality at the Nile River, and Lake Nasser (A) in south Egypt, for subsequent hybridizations. The objectives of this study were to investigate the presence of SNPs within the Oreochromis niloticus growth hormone gene, to conduct marker-trait association between the identified SNPs and growth performance (body weight and length), to select individuals with superior growth performance bearing such beneficial SNPs as broad stocks for the subsequent hybridization process, and to evaluate the early offspring performance in 72-h-old larvae obtained from selected broadstocks.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Ethical Statement

The relevant international and institutional guidelines pertaining to the moral care and application of animals have been adhered to. The National Institute of Oceanography and Fisheries (NIOF) Committee for Ethical Care and Use of Animals/Aquatic Animals (NIOF-IACUC) extensively reviewed the research protocol and assigned an acceptance code (NIOF-AQ6F22P031).

2.2. Broadstock Collection, Adaptation, and Tagging

Nile tilapia, Oreochromis niloticus, wild populations were obtained from three Egyptian water bodies: Lake Brullus (B), the River Nile at El-Qanater El-Khairia (Q), and Lake Nasser (A) (Figure 1).
A total of 155 fish samples (89 females and 66 males) of the same age (one year old; ageing was conducted by direct scale examination [33]), with lengths ranging from 17.5 to 24 cm and weights ranging from 252 to 470 gm, were collected from the three locations. The fish stocks were transferred in aerated fish tanks to the National Institute of Oceanography and Fisheries (NIOF), El-Qanater El-Khairia, Egypt. The fish were then sorted according to their sex in separate fibreglass tanks (2 m3) with a suitable density (5.3 kg/m3), constituting six groups (males EL-Qanater (MQ: 23), males Lake Brullus (MB: 22), males Lake Nasser (MA: 21), females EL-Qanater (FQ: 15), females Lake Brullus (FB: 31), and females Lake Nasser (FA: 43)), with sex ratios (male: female) of 1.53:1, 0.71:1, and 0.49:1 in the EL-Qanater, Lake Brullus, and Lake Nasser populations, respectively. The fish stocks were kept in quarantine for 30 days to neutralize the influence of prior environmental exposures and synchronize metabolic baselines, during which any fish with abnormal physical activity and/or feeding response were excluded [34,35,36].
Fish samples were labelled with a TG2-F tagging gun (Dynamic Aqua Supply Ltd., Canada) (Dynamic Aqua Supply Ltd., Surrey, BC, Canada). The weight and length of all individuals were recorded monthly. Each group was reared in separate tanks with an average stocking density of 5.3 kg/m3, and the feeding regime was continuously adjusted according to the standing stock biomass (3%) and crude protein % (30.3) [37].
The water quality measurements, including temperature, pH, dissolved oxygen, and ammonia, were assessed daily throughout the experiment via a mercury thermometer, pH meter (Digital Mini-pH Meter, model 55, Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA), digital oximeter (Yellow Spring Instrument Co., model 58, Yellow Springs, OH, USA), and DREL/2 HACH kits (HACH Co., Loveland, CO, USA), and the results were verified as per the permissible limits set by the American Public Health Association. The average temperature, pH, DO, and NH3 were 28 °C, 7.3, >5.0 mg/L, and <0.02 mg/L, respectively; the daily water exchange rate was 20% of the tank’s capacity [38].

2.3. Parent Crosses and Fry Collection

The selected broodstocks were transferred into spawning tanks (2 m3) with a sex ratio of 1 male to 3 females (12 fish per tank: 3 males and 9 females). Spawning was allowed under semi-natural conditions without hormonal induction. Broodstock were fed a high-protein diet (38–40% crude protein) to support optimal reproductive performance and egg quality [39,40].
Fry were gently collected from the mouths of brooding females at 72 h post-hatch for gene expression analysis to mimic the natural maternal care of Nile tilapia species until sampling, while the 72 h time point represents a critical developmental phase where growth-related gene expression is activated as the fry approach exogenous feeding onset [41,42]

2.4. Genetic Analysis of the Broadstocks

2.4.1. Broadstock’s DNA Extraction, PCR Primer Design, and Partial GH Gene Amplification and Sequencing

To ensure noninvasive DNA extraction, a 0.5 cm2 clip of the caudal fins of the tagged fish was collected via sharp, disinfected scissors and kept in absolute ethanol at −20 °C. Total genomic DNA was extracted from the tagged fish samples, including males and females (males EL-Qanater (MQ: 23), males Lake Brullus (MB: 22), males Lake Nasser (MA: 21), females EL-Qanater (FQ: 15), females Lake Brullus (FB: 31), and females Lake Nasser (FA: 43)), as described by Asahida et al. [43]. Specific primers for the growth hormone gene encoding GH were designed to partially amplify the Oreochromis niloticus growth hormone (GH) gene (GenBank accession No. M97766.1). Forward and reverse primers were designed using Primer3 [44]. The selected primer combinations were (forward, GH-1F: 5′-CGAGAAGGGACCACTGCTTT-3′) and (reverse, GH-1R: 5′-AGAGCTCTCCTATGACATGTGT-3′), targeting a fragment of 600 bp. Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) amplification was performed via an Applied Biosystems Verity 96-well thermocycler (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA). The reaction mixture, with a total volume of 20 µL, composed of 12.5 µL of BIOLINE 2X My Taq Red Mix master mix, 1 µL of DNA template (approximately 20 ng), 1 µL of forward and reverse primers, and 4.5 µL of DNase/RNase free water using the following PCR conditions: initial denaturation at 94 °C for 4 min, followed by 35 amplification cycles consisting of denaturation for 1 min at 94 °C, annealing for 1 min at 62 °C, and a 90 s extension at 72 °C. The final step included a 10 min extension at 72 °C. The produced amplicons were purified as described by Megahed et al. [45] and validated by agarose gel electrophoresis (2%) before use in direct sequencing. The PCR products were sequenced using the same primers by Macrogen (Seoul, Republic of Korea).

2.4.2. Sequence Analysis and SNP Discovery

To ensure high data accuracy and reliability, quality control (QC) of raw sequence data was carried out prior to alignment and SNP discovery. Chromas software (version 2.6.6) was initially used to visualize chromatogram files to evaluate base-calling accuracy and remove low-quality ends. The raw reads were evaluated using Phred quality scores calculated as Q = −10 × log10(P), where Q is the Phred quality score and P is the probability of an incorrect base call. Reads were trimmed to remove low-quality bases (Phred score < 20). Sequences with more than 5% ambiguous bases (N) or shorter than 100 bp after trimming were excluded from further analysis [46].
Sequence alignment and editing were conducted using BioEdit version 7.0.9.0 [47]; subsequently, the sequences were examined with the Basic Local Alignment Search Tool (BLAST) version 2.14.1 from the NCBI database to verify the accurate amplification of the target fragment of the GH gene. Sequence data produced in the current study have been deposited in the GenBank nucleotide sequence database (accession numbers LC832463–LC832617).
Single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) discovery was conducted via the online tool Sniplay3 [48]. Raw sequence data were pre-processed using vcftools v0.1.16 [49] as implemented in Sniplay3 with the following criteria to retain only high-confidence SNPs: (minQ 30; remove SNPs with quality scores below 30, minDP 10; ensures a minimum read depth of 10 per SNP, maxDP 100; ensures a maximum read depth of 100, maf 0.01; minor allele frequency ≥0.01, max-missing 0.90, retain SNPs in most samples).
Aligned FASTA files of the partial GH sequences accession numbers LC832463 to LC832617 were used to generate a consensus sequence, highlighting the most abundant nucleotides and their respective positions. This consensus sequence was then compared to each individual sequence to identify SNPs and their respective frequencies.

2.4.3. Population Structure and Kinship Analysis Using SNP Data

Since the presence of population structure and/or kinship could affect genetic association outcomes, genotypic data from SNPs were used to determine the number of homogeneous populations using STRUCTURE software version 2.3.4 [50], applying a blind evaluation without previous population information and an admixture model with correlated allele frequencies. The number of clusters (K) was set between one and eight; runs had a burn-in period of 106 iterations, followed by 106 data collection iterations, and were repeated at least six times. The number of clusters was determined using the ad hoc statistic ∆K, and the assignment probabilities were visualized via DISTRUCT 1.1 [51]. Pairwise kinship coefficients among the studied genotypes were determined using the kinship procedure of Ritland [52] in SPAGeDi version 1.5 [53].

2.4.4. Association Analysis Between SNPs and Body Characteristics

To determine the genetic correlation between the detected SNPs and body characteristics, the mixed linear model approach (MLM) was used while accounting for both fixed and random effects as implemented in TASSEL version 5.0 [54]. The model was defined as follows:
y = Xβ + Qγ + Zu + ϵ
where y represents the observed phenotypic values. The fixed effect Xβ included population, location, age, initial weight, sex, and SNP genotype. The term Qγ accounts for the fixed effect of population structure. The random effect Zu represents kinship among individuals, where u and ϵ denote the residual error. This model allowed for accurate estimation of SNP effects while controlling for confounding effects due to relatedness and environmental variables. The inclusion of both population structure and kinship in MLM minimizes Type I error by leveraging relatedness and population structure effects.
False-positive results owing to population structure or familial relationships among the genotypes would be reduced if the association model included both elements [55]. Positive associations were detected at the p < 0.05 level, and all results were further corrected for multiple testing via Benjamini–Hochberg false discovery rate (FDR) procedure [56]. This approach ranks all observed p-values and adjusts them based on their rank and the total number of tests performed to control the expected proportion of false positives. SNPs with an FDR-adjusted p-value (q-value) below 0.05 were statistically significant. Applying the FDR allows the identification of true associations while minimizing false-positive associations due to multiple testing. The FDR thresholds were calculated using Microsoft Excel.

2.4.5. Linkage Disequilibrium Analysis

For further detection of the candidate region(s) related to the two traits, a linkage disequilibrium analysis was conducted within the chromosomal regions using a sliding window of 300 bp using Haploview v4.2 [57]. The linkage disequilibrium analysis defined a block based on the solid spin algorithm according to the criteria of Gabriel et al. [58].

2.5. Isolation of RNA and cDNA Synthesis from 72-Hour Larvae

2.5.1. RNA Extraction

RNA was extracted from selected broadstocks’ larvae 72 h post-hatch (three/group) and compared against the control group (three/group) of the same-aged larvae, which was obtained from a commercial hatchery located at Kafr El-Sheikh using ABTizol (Applied Biotechnology, Ismailia, Egypt) following the manufacturer’s guidelines. The purity and concentration of the extracted RNA were evaluated using NanoDrop at 260/280 nm (BioDrop, Cambridge, UK). The isolated RNA was utilized in cDNA synthesis using the ABT 2X RT mix (Applied Biotechnology, Ismailia, Egypt), complying with the producer’s directives. The cDNA was deep-frozen at −20 °C until further analysis. The cDNA was validated using polymerase chain reaction (PCR) using the reference gene (βeta-actin). Subsequently, the amplicon was examined on a 2% agarose gel electrophoresis and visualized using the gel documentation system (Biometra, Analytic Jena Company, Göttingen, Germany).

2.5.2. Quantitative Real-Time PCR

The qRT-PCR was performed to analyse the RNA transcript of growth-related genes (growth hormone (GH) and insulin growth factor I (IGFI)), inflammatory-related genes (interleukin 1 beta (IL1β), interleukin 8 (IL8), CC chemokine (CC), CXC2 chemokine (CXC2), and tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNFα)), the immune-related gene (recombination activating gene (Rag)), and the neurological development-related gene (sacsin molecular chaperone (Sacs)) (Table 1).
The reaction mixture is composed of 10 μL SYBR green with low Rox (ABT 2X qPCR Mix (Applied Biotechnology, Egypt), 0.8 μL from each primer (R and F), 2 μL complementary DNA, and 6.4 μL of RNase-free water (total volume 20 μL). The thermal profile commences with an initial heating phase for 3 min at 95 °C, followed by 45 cycles, 15 s each at 95 °C, and an annealing for 1 min at 60 °C. The reaction was repeated twice. To test the precision of the PCR amplicons, the dissociation curve was made at the completion of the last cycle. This required collecting fluorescence data at 60 °C and checking every 7 s until the temperature reached 95 °C [32].

2.6. Statistical Analysis

Statistical analyses were performed using GraphPad Prism v8.1 (GraphPad Software, San Diego, CA, USA). For body weight and length (one-year-old fish specimens), a two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was conducted to evaluate the effects of sex and location (both treated as fixed effects). Where significant interactions were detected, Tukey’s post hoc test was used for pairwise comparisons.
The expression profiles of 72-hour-old larvae were analysed utilising comparative threshold cycle (CT). The results were recorded as fold change and compared to the control after normalisation by the β-actin gene as a reference gene [66,67,68].
Relative quantification of targeted genes was calculated using the comparative threshold cycle (CT) method following Rao et al. [69].
Where fold change = 2−ΔΔct.
Variations in gene expression results were interpreted by one-way ANOVA. GraphPad Prism software v8.1 (GraphPad Software, San Diego, CA, USA). The results were expressed as mean ± SE; significance was located at p ≤ 0.05. While tank effects were minimized by maintaining standardized rearing conditions and consistent density across tanks, all replicates were randomly distributed, and no significant tank-dependent variation was observed. Thus, random tank effects were not modeled statistically.

3. Results

3.1. Variation in Body Measurements Across Locations

Significant differences were observed in body weight and length among the three studied populations of Oreochromis niloticus (Lake Brullus, El-Qanater, and Lake Nasser). Moreover, within-population sex differences were evident, particularly in the River Nile (El-Qanater) and Lake Brullus populations. Notably, fish from Lake Nasser, both males and females, exhibited significantly higher morphometric values than their counterparts from the other two regions (Figure 2A,B).

3.2. Sequence Analysis and SNPs Discovery of the Growth Hormone (GH) Gene

Successful amplification of the targeted 600 bp region within the GH gene (covering parts of exons and introns) was achieved in all 155 tagged individuals. BLAST alignment confirmed specificity to the GH gene (GenBank accession no. M97766.1). A 585 bp consensus sequence was generated, and a total of 40 SNPs were initially identified through variant calling. Following quality control filtering criteria, which included thresholds for minimum quality score (QUAL ≥ 30), minimum read depth (DP ≥ 10), minor allele frequency (MAF ≥ 0.01), and a maximum of 10% missing data per SNP, fourteen high-quality SNPs passed all QC criteria (Figure 3). The selected SNPs were at detectable allele frequencies (i.e., MAF ≥ 0.01), ensuring adequate coverage across the dataset. The selected SNPs exhibited low missing genotypes (MAX of 10% missing data per SNP). These filtered variants were subsequently retained for downstream analyses.

3.3. Population Structure Assessment

STRUCTURE analysis based on GH gene SNPs identified two primary genetic clusters (K = 2) (Figure 4). However, this classification did not clearly separate the six tested subpopulations. Male groups from all three locations (MA, MQ, MB) exhibited relative genetic homogeneity, whereas female groups showed more variability.

3.4. Association Analysis Using SNPs

3.4.1. Associations Between SNPs and Morphometric Traits

The results of significance testing for the fixed effects included in the MLM association model, including population, location, age, initial weight, sex, and SNP genotype, along with the corresponding F-statistics, p-values, and R2 values, are presented in Supplementary Table S1. Nine SNPs and three InDels were significantly associated with body weight and/or length, confirmed after false discovery rate (FDR) correction (Table 2).
The proportion of phenotypic variance (R2) explained by individual markers ranged from 2.6% (e.g., SNP3, SNP4 with body weight) to 36% (InDel3 with body weight). Several markers (SNP1, SNP8, InDel2, InDel3) were associated with both traits simultaneously (Figure 5).

3.4.2. Linkage Disequilibrium Analysis

Three haplotype blocks were identified among the associated SNPs: Block 1 (SNP1, SNP2), Block 2 (SNP3–SNP6), and Block 3 (SNP7–SNP9), demonstrating strong linkage disequilibrium (Figure 6).

3.4.3. Population-Specific Effects of SNPs

The effect of SNPs on morphometric traits varied among populations (Figure 7). All markers showed a general positive effect on body length across populations. MQ and MB exhibited the highest number of SNPs/InDels linked to increased body length. In contrast, MA showed unique SNPs (SNP3, SNP4, SNP9) and InDel3 associated with significantly higher body weight (Figure 7A,B).

3.4.4. Genotypic Distribution of SNP-Associated Traits

The number of genotypes carrying the SNP-associated trait differed across populations (Table 3). MA (n = 39) and MQ (n = 38) had the highest genotype counts with significant SNP-trait correlations. In contrast, lower genotype counts were found in FB (n = 9) and FQ (n = 11). Genotype-SNP combinations associated with either or both body weight and length showed population-specific patterns.

3.5. Gene Expression Profiles in F1 Progeny

Significant upregulation of growth-related genes (GH, IGFI) was observed in F1 progeny of selected broodstock, particularly in the Lake Nasser group (p < 0.05), followed by El-Qanater and Lake Brullus (Figure 8). Proinflammatory cytokines (IL1β, IL8) and chemokines (CXC2) were also elevated in all tested progenies compared to the hatchery control group (p < 0.05). Notably, TNFα expression was significantly downregulated in Lake Nasser progeny compared to Lake Brullus (Figure 9). Moreover, genes associated with neural and immune development (sacs, Rag) were significantly upregulated in all groups except for Rag in Lake Brullus progeny, suggesting early ontogenetic activation of immune and neurodevelopmental pathways (Figure 10).

4. Discussion

Choosing the appropriate strain and implementing efficient feeding and rearing strategies are key components of successful aquaculture, as they assist in achieving the production objectives and reducing the input costs [70]. In aquaculture, growth performance is the most critical asset that should be enhanced [14,24]. Prior to conducting any genetic studies of the present research, multiple approaches were implemented to mitigate the ecological carryover effect that arose from the sampling site differences of the wild populations of Nile tilapia fish, including subjecting all fish samples to acclimatisation periods to help synchronise the metabolic baselines and using the monthly body measurement in the marker trait association analysis to account for individual growth dynamics over time; however, these inherited effects cannot be completely eliminated. Hence, this phenomenon is largely related to the complex interaction between environmental history, parental conditioning, and epigenetic influences, which can persist across generations even under controlled experimental circumstances [71,72].
In the current study, a partial sequence of the GH gene was analysed for the presence of SNPs, focusing on their potential application in association with growth performance traits. This approach enables the use of GH polymorphisms as a preliminary step in a genetic improvement program for Nile tilapia. GH performs a key role in several physiological processes, including muscle growth, efficient feed conversion, reproduction, immunity, salinity adaptation, and pollution resistance [16,73].
In the present study, the body measurements of Nile tilapia, O. niloticus, populations revealed significant differences across the three studied locations (Lake Brullus, EL-Qanater, and Lake Nasser). Compared to those of the EL-Qanater and Lake Brullus populations, the Lake Nasser population showed the highest body weight and length. The superior growth performance of Lake Nasser’s strains was reported previously. For instance, Awad et al. [32] reported the upregulated expression of the growth-linked genes in the Oreochromis niloticus population in Lake Nasser and the diminished heavy metal concentration in its water. Also, Abdel-tawwab et al. [74] reported the superior growth performance of Lake Nasser Oreochromis niloticus populations and attributed this growth performance to the interaction between genotype and the environment. On the other hand, Musa et al. [70] attributed the superior growth performance of this particular Oreochromis niloticus population to genetic factors. The genetic makeup of Lake Nasser’s strains, in addition to the exceptional water quality of the lake, may have synergistically contributed to the superior growth performance of this population [75,76].
Substantial variations in length were observed between males and females from Lake Brullus and El-Qanater; these differences might be associated with the divergent impacts of sex hormones on the growth performance of teleost fish [77,78]. Notably, the principal female sex hormone, oestrogen, reduces the responsiveness of hepatocytes to GH and suppresses the expression of the IGFI gene. Conversely, androgens, which are male hormones, increase the sensitivity of liver cells to GH and boost the expression of the IGFI gene, leading to enhanced growth performance [77,79].
Many factors affect the presence of SNPs, including endogenous elements like genetic tendency and reactive oxygen generated during regular cellular metabolism. In addition to mutagenic substances, including heavy metals and radiation [80,81,82]. Fish specimens in the current study were collected from three geographic and ecologically distant locations. Lake Brullus is a relatively shallow and confined northern brackish water lake. On the other hand, EL-Qanater is considered a middle location belonging to the river Nile, while Lake Nasser is a massive freshwater southern man-made reservoir [65,66,67,68,69,83,84,85,86,87].
The assessment of SNP frequency in the current study revealed that Lake Nasser and EL-Qanater populations (MA, FA, MQ, and FQ) harbored the highest number of SNPs affecting body weight and length. This pattern was also reflected in the assessment of body measurements, as they showed the highest body characteristics compared to Lake Brullus populations.
The elevated SNP frequency of the EL-Qanater population is expected; hence, this population exists within the River Nile system with uncontrolled population migration. The cross-breeding among different populations enhances genetic diversity and subsequently increases the frequency of SNPs associated with improved body weight and length [80,88].
The high SNP frequencies were also reported in the Lake Nasser O. niloticus population in the current study, which could be attributed to Lake Nasser’s enormous surface area and significant depth variation across the lake (varying from five meters near the edge to 130 m near the dam). Also, the existence of 85 khors (flooded valleys) contributed to separating microenvironment formation with diverse heat and oxygen stratification profiles, which in turn trigger mutations, including SNPs for better adaptation [89]. On the other hand, the notably low genotype frequency of SNPs in fish recovered from Lake Brullus may be linked to inbreeding; hence, the lake’s shallow conditions promote inbreeding and decrease the occurrence of heterozygous individuals [83,84]. Furthermore, the limited gene flow due to physical barriers could potentially lead to a lower frequency of SNPs in growth hormone genes, where the diminished depth creates a relatively homogenous environmental condition across the lake [83,84,90,91]. Moreover, the massive inflow of pollutants into the lake through agricultural and industrial drainage channels causes detrimental impacts on water quality and fish health [80,91,92]. These preceding factors result in oxidative stress, DNA damage, and heightened selection pressures linked to tolerance and survival rather than improved growth performance [92]. The presence of an increased number of genotypes with SNPs within a specific population(s) would suggest their suitability for body traits improvement when included in mating design for prospective development plans [93,94]. Therefore, for the anticipated hybridization step of the program, only Lake Nasser (A) and EL-Qanater (Q) populations are considered.
In the current study, the analysis of the GH gene (≈600 bp) identified 14 SNPs with a minor allele frequency (MAF) >1%. In addition, based on STRUCTURE analysis, population admixture has been detected, where the studied populations (MA, MB, MQ, FA, FB, and FQ) belonged to two presumed populations (K = 2) with no distinct differentiation between populations. These findings could imply the presence of a shared ancestor and/or similar selective force across populations [95]. Similarly, significant population admixture was previously reported via SNP-based structure analysis in O. niloticus strains cultured in Tanzania [96], where the examined populations originated from a single ancestor located at Lake Victoria, and this admixture was attributed to the uncontrolled movement of fish between different locations. A similar case was also reported by Fagbémi et al. [97] where only four populations, rather than seven, were present among seven wild and domesticated populations of O. niloticus from Benin, West Africa.
The present association analysis results highlight the complex genetic structure underlying growth performance in the studied populations. These traits were significantly associated with nine SNPs and three InDels, with R2 ranging from 2.6 to 36%. The wide range of phenotypic variance (R2) suggests the presence of a higher impact of some genetic variants on growth performance.
The study also revealed a correlation between only two SNPs (SNP1 and SNP8) and two InDels (InDel2 and InDel3) with both body weight and length, indicating the valuable application of such specific genetic markers in the next genetic improvement programs.
Haplotype blocks are segments of the chromosome characterized by elevated linkage disequilibrium (LD), diminished haplotype diversity, and a low rate of recombination [57,58]. Therefore, tightly linked SNPs (SNP1 and SNP2 block 1; SNP3, SNP4, SNP5, and SNP6 block 2; SNP7, SNP8, and SNP9 block 3) within a single haplotype block ensure their stability through generations (as they are inherited as cohesive units through generations). Such a pattern highlights SNPs’ importance as reliable markers for MAS in O. niloticus genetic improvement programs [98]. Similarly, Jaser et al. [73] reported comparable findings where a total of 10 SNPs located within the promoter and first intron of the GH gene in O. niloticus showed significant association with increased body weight. They attributed this pattern to the genetic background of the examined fish, in addition to the different linkage disequilibrium (LD) extent, which in turn influenced the formation of haplotype blocks.
The identified SNPs, during the current study, were significantly associated with a high growth rate, allowing the future use of such SNPs in MAS programs. In the same context, Cuevas-Rodríguez et al. [99] found two SNPs in the promoter area of the GH gene, eight SNPs in the introns and promoter region of the IGF-I gene, and one SNP in the myogenin gene linked to growth in Nile tilapia, Oreochromis niloticus. Similarly, Li et al. [100] assessed the marker-trait associations of growth in yellow catfish, Pelteobagrus fulvidraco, through direct sequencing of the growth hormone gene. They discovered three SNPs significantly associated with growth traits. Moreover, Naby et al. [101] reported the presence of growth-related SNPs within the intron and exon of the GH receptor gene in Nile tilapia, Oreochromis niloticus.
The variation in SNP frequencies, in the current study, was also noticed to be sex-related; the male population showed higher SNP frequencies compared to females, where MQ had six SNPs and one InDel, while MA showed five SNPs and one InDel. In contrast, females (FA and FQ) had two SNPs and one InDel, which were associated with both length and weight. This may be explained by the effect of natural selective pressure, where larger males with faster growth rates due to GH polymorphisms (SNPs) have higher chances for survival and the advantage in male-to-male competition during breeding seasons, resulting in a higher chance of mating with females [78,102].
The larval stage represents the most critical stage of the aquaculture cycle, as the growth performance in early life stages of fish affects their overall growth performance [103]. Furthermore, at this stage, the immune system of larvae is undeveloped; therefore, they are highly vulnerable to environmental stressors and infectious agents [26,104,105].
The gene expression assessment can directly detect changes resulting from different genomic signatures, including variations in allele frequencies, promoter modification, and heritable epigenetic alteration, even after a single generation of selection [106].
In the current study, the expression profiles of 72-hour-old larvae were studied utilising comparative threshold cycle (CT). The results were recorded as fold change and compared to the control after normalisation by the β-actin gene as a reference gene. While the use of multiple reference genes enhances the accuracy and stability of qPCR normalisation, several studies have validated the suitability of β-actin as a reliable single reference gene in Oreochromis niloticus under various experimental conditions [107,108]. Therefore, the use of a single, well-validated housekeeping gene such as β-actin remains acceptable and scientifically justified in gene expression studies, particularly where resource limitations exist [69,75,104].
In the current study, the IGFI was significantly upregulated in all the tested progeny compared to the control group, while the GH gene expression was at its highest in Lake Nasser progeny compared to all remaining groups; considering that all larvae were reared under identical environmental conditions, their elevated growth-related genes might be referred to their genetic background. The observed synergistic upregulation of GH and IGF1 gene expression in Lake Nasser (A) progeny is likely due to the regulatory influence of the GH gene on IGF1. GH gene upregulation triggers several signaling pathways involving Janus kinase 2 (JAK2), signal transducers and activators of transcription (STAT), phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3K)-protein kinase B (AKT), and extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK). These pathways ultimately lead to enhanced transcription of IGFI, explaining its increased expression in response to GH stimulation [26,109]. Similarly, Opazo et al. [110] studied the variation in gene expression of 20-day-old larvae divided according to their growth performance into two groups (30 specimens each), large and small; these larvae were obtained from one pair of adult zebrafish and reared under the same environmental conditions. Their finding revealed a significant difference in the gene expression of GH and IGFI between the fast- and slow-growing siblings, indicating a genetic basis for growth variation. Additionally, Devlin et al. [111] have reported the role of genetic elements in growth performance alteration, where they reported differences in gene expression of GH and IGFI genes in three juvenile populations (wild, domesticated, and transgenic) of roho salmon (Oncorhynchus kisutch) maintained at identical conditions. Furthermore, Christie et al. [106] examined the gene expression profile of multiple genes in offspring of wild and hatchery steelhead trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) reared in a common environment; their results reported a significant gene expression alteration in 723 genes, including growth-related genes. They referred their finding to the massive, heritable changes occurring during the first stages of selection and domestication.
In teleost, GH shows an evident positive connection to immunity, as the elevation of its circulating level improves immunity and increases leukocyte proliferation, while hypophysectomy is linked to immune suppression [112,113,114].
Phagocytosis (innate immune response) activation and regulation are driven by proinflammatory cytokines, especially IL1β and TNFα, in addition to chemokines (CXC2 and CC), small chemoattractant proteins. The synergetic action of cytokines and chemokines creates a robust immune network, enabling swift and localised immune responses [115].
In the current study, the gene expression of IL1β and IL8 was significantly upregulated in Lake Nasser (A) and EL-Qanater (Q) progenies compared to Lake Brullus (B) and the control groups. The CXC2 RNA transcript was significantly upregulated in the progeny of the three populations compared to the reference group, while the CC chemokine and TNFα show no significant difference compared to the control. Likewise, Pontigo and Vargas-Chacoff [116] recorded the significant upregulation of IL1β and IL8 gene expression 16 h post-stimulation with growth hormone in two Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar) head kidney cell lines. Furthermore, Shved et al. [117] reported a positive relationship between elevated growth hormone and upregulation of TNFα, where they reported a significant induction of RNA transcript of TNFα in the spleen and pituitary gland of Nile tilapia upon intraperitoneal injection with growth hormone. Moreover, Nakharuthai and Srisapoome [118] documented the induction of CXC2 gene expression in unstressed Nile tilapia; they referred to this induction as the immune surveillance activity of CXC2 chemokine.
The gene expression of the sacs gene in the current study was significantly upregulated in all tested larval groups, while the gene expression of Rag was significantly upregulated in only Lake Nasser and EL-Qanater offspring. This result could imply an early development of both the immune and neural immune systems, as the Rag gene is related to the early development of the adaptive immune response (B and T cells) of teleost [62], where it encodes proteins related to V(D)J recombination, a process necessary for diverse antigen combinations by lymphocytes [119,120]. In contrast, the sacs gene is related to early neural development and mitochondrial integrity [120]. Similarly, Lee et al. [121] tracked the gene expression pattern of the Rag gene starting from five to fifty-five days post-hatch for tracking the developmental stages of the adaptive immune system in olive flounder, Paralichthys olivaceus. Furthermore, Lee et al. [122] examined the gradual development of the immune system through Rag and sacs genes expression assessment in loach (Misgurnus anguillicaudatus) from day zero post-hatching to 40 days post-hatching.

5. Conclusions

The present study on Nile tilapia, Oreochromis niloticus, a key species in global and Egyptian aquaculture, provides valuable insights into the genetic associations of body traits with single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in the growth hormone (GH) gene. Furthermore, the effect of different ecological conditions and sex on SNP abundance was recorded. The population structure revealed the presence of two homogeneous groups, with no clear separation between the studied populations. Association analysis revealed the presence of nine SNPs and three InDels with significant effects on body weight and length. Some of the identified SNPs are simultaneously associated with an increase in body weight and body length, recognized as the most valuable SNPs (SNP1, SNP8, InDel2, and InDel3). Additionally, population-specific SNPs were also detected among the studied populations, suggesting that the use of such populations would accelerate tilapia breeding programs. In all locations, SNP frequencies differed between male and female populations, highlighting the variance in natural selection pressure in opposite sexes under the same circumstances due to behavioral and hormonal differences. Linkage disequilibrium analysis identified three main haplotype blocks, facilitating further genomic analyses. The gene expression assessment of growth, proinflammatory, immunological, and neurological development-related genes in F1 larvae of the selected parent revealed a significant improvement of all tested parameters. Notably, the significant induction of the RNA transcripts of the growth-related genes GH in the F1 progeny of Lake Nasser and IGFI across all selected groups (B, A, and Q) might indicate that the identified SNPs are not only statistically associated with growth traits but also function biologically. Furthermore, the simultaneous induction of proinflammatory cytokines, chemokines, and genes related to early immune and neural development in the F1 progeny suggests a harmonised molecular response that may enhance early survival, physiological resilience, and overall growth potential. The current research highlights the potential for utilizing specific populations harboring candidate SNPs in prospective tilapia breeding programs to enhance desirable traits.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/ani15142097/s1, Table S1: Results of significance testing for fixed effects on weight and length in Nile tilapia based on SNP and InDel variants in the GH gene.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, F.S.A. and M.I.; methodology, F.S.A., S.T.A., E.M.A., A.M., and H.N.; software, M.I., F.S.A., and S.T.A.; validation, M.I., F.S.A., and S.T.A.; formal analysis, M.I.; investigation, S.T.A.; resources, F.S.A.; data curation, F.S.A., M.I., and A.F.E.N.; writing original draft preparation, F.S.A., S.T.A., and M.I.; writing, review and editing, S.A.H., E.E.-H., and A.F.E.N.; visualization, F.S.A. and M.I.; supervision, F.S.A. and M.I.; project administration, F.S.A.; funding acquisition, F.S.A. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This study was sponsored by the project entitled ‘Improvement of Nile tilapia, Oreochromis niloticus, genetic resources through selective breeding’ funded by the Academy of Scientific Research and Technology (ASRT), Egypt, project number 48H/2020.

Institutional Review Board Statement

The relevant international and institutional guidelines pertaining to the moral care and application of animals have been adhered to. The National Institute of Oceanography and Fisheries (NIOF) Committee for Ethical Care and Use of Animals/Aquatic Animals (NIOF-IACUC) extensively reviewed the research protocol and assigned an acceptance code (NIOF-AQ6F22P031).

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The datasets used and/or examined during the current research are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Acknowledgments

We also acknowledge the “Medical Research Center, Molecular Biology Lab, Alexandria University” for technical support.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Abbreviations

The following abbreviations are used in this manuscript:
AbbreviationFull Name
SNPSingle Nucleotide Polymorphism
GHGrowth Hormone
IGF1Insulin-like Growth Factor I
IL1βInterleukin 1 Beta
IL8Interleukin 8
CCCC Chemokine (β-chemokine)
CXC2CXC2 Chemokine (α-chemokine)
TNFαTumor Necrosis Factor Alpha
RagRecombination Activating Gene
SacsSacsin Molecular Chaperone
MASMarker-Assisted Selection
SSRSimple Sequence Repeat
HPSHypothalamic-Pituitary-Somatotropic
PCRPolymerase Chain Reaction
FDRFalse Discovery Rate
LDLinkage Disequilibrium
qRT-PCRQuantitative Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction
NIOFNational Institute of Oceanography and Fisheries
IACUCInstitutional Animal Care and Use Committee
bpBase Pairs
BLASTBasic Local Alignment Search Tool
MAFMinor Allele Frequency
KNumber of Clusters (in STRUCTURE analysis)
ERKExtracellular Signal-Regulated Kinase
PI3KPhosphatidylinositol 3-Kinase
AKTProtein Kinase B
JAK2Janus Kinase 2
STATSignal Transducers and Activators of Transcription
GIFTGenetically Improved Farmed Tilapia
GSTGenomar Supreme Tilapia
USAUnited States of America
RNARibonucleic Acid
DNADeoxyribonucleic Acid
cDNAComplementary DNA
EL-QanaterEl-Qanater El-Khairia

References

  1. Boyd, C.E.; D’Abramo, L.R.; Glencross, B.D.; Huyben, D.C.; Juarez, L.M.; Lockwood, G.S.; McNevin, A.A.; Tacon, A.G.J.; Teletchea, F.; Tomasso, J.R.; et al. Achieving Sustainable Aquaculture: Historical and Current Perspectives and Future Needs and Challenges. J. World Aquac. Soc. 2020, 51, 578–633. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Gjedrem, T.; Robinson, N.; Rye, M. The Importance of Selective Breeding in Aquaculture to Meet Future Demands for Animal Protein: A Review. Aquaculture 2012, 350–353, 117–129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Siddique, M.A.B.; Mahalder, B.; Haque, M.M.; Bashar, A.; Hasan, M.M.; Shohan, M.H.; Talukdar, M.M.N.; Biswas, J.C.; Ahammad, A.K.S. Assessment of Embryonic and Larval Development of Nile Tilapia under the Traditional and Re-Circulatory Thermostatic System in Relation to Climatic and Water Quality Variations. Aquac. J. 2023, 3, 70–89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Hamed, S.; El-Kassas, S.; Abo-Al-Ela, H.G.; Abdo, S.E.; Abou-Ismail, U.A.; Mohamed, R.A. Temperature and Feeding Frequency: Interactions with Growth, Immune Response, and Water Quality in Juvenile Nile Tilapia. BMC Vet. Res. 2024, 20, 520. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Soliman, N.F.; Yacout, D.M.M. Aquaculture in Egypt: Status, constraints and potentials. Aquac. Int. 2016, 24, 1201–1227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Barría, A.; Trinh, T.Q.; Mahmuddin, M.; Benzie, J.A.H.; Chadag, V.M.; Houston, R.D. Genetic Parameters for Resistance to Tilapia Lake Virus (TiLV) in Nile Tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus). Aquaculture 2020, 522, 735126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Fu, J.; Shen, Y.; Xu, X.; Li, J. Genetic Parameter Estimates for Growth of Grass Carp, Ctenopharyngodon idella, at 10 and 18months of Age. Aquaculture 2016, 450, 342–348. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Kjetså, M.H.; Ødegård, J.; Meuwissen, T.H.E. Accuracy of Genomic Prediction of Host Resistance to Salmon Lice in Atlantic Salmon (Salmo salar) Using Imputed High-Density Genotypes. Aquaculture 2020, 526, 735415. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Pasaribu, W.; Sukenda, S.; Nuryati, S. The Efficacy of Nile Tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus) Broodstock and Larval Immunization against Streptococcus agalactiae and Aeromonas hydrophila. Fishes 2018, 3, 16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Das, S.; Sahoo, P.K. Markers for selection of disease resistance in fish: A review. Aquac. Int. 2014, 22, 1793–1812. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Song, H.; Dong, T.; Yan, X.; Wang, W.; Tian, Z.; Sun, A.; Dong, Y.; Zhu, H.; Hu, H. Genomic selection and its research progress in aquaculture breeding. Rev. Aquac. 2023, 15, 274–291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Hakim, M.M.; Syed, M.A. Advances in molecular markers and their applications in aquaculture and fisheries. Genet. Aquat. Org. 2017, 1, 21–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Lind, C.E.; Ponzoni, R.W.; Nguyen, N.H.; Khaw, H.L. Selective Breeding in Fish and Conservation of Genetic Resources for Aquaculture. Reprod. Domest. Anim. 2012, 47, 255–263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Alam, S.; Zafrin, M.S.; Alam, M.S. Microsatellite marker-based variation in the growth hormone genes of Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus). Banglad. J. Fish. 2020, 32, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Sandra, S.A.; Nasrullah, H.; Arfah, H.; Zairin, M., Jr.; Alimuddin, A. Growth and expression pattern of growth-related genes in the fast-growing giant gourami (Osphronemus goramy). Indones. Aquac. J. 2021, 16, 79–89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Dias, M.A.D.; Reis Neto, R.V.; Bueno Filho, J.S.d.S.; Jaser, S.K.K.; Lago, A.d.A.; Hilsdorf, A.W.S. Growth Hormone Gene Polymorphism Associated with Grow-out Performance of Oreochromis niloticus Strains. Aquaculture 2019, 503, 105–110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Hamzah, A.; Ponzoni, R.W.; Nguyen, N.H.; Khaw, H.L.; Yee, H.Y.; Mohd Nor, S.A. Performance of the Genetically Improved Farmed Tilapia (GIFT) Strain over Ten Generations of Selection in Malaysia. Pertanika J. Trop. Agric. Sci. 2014, 37, 411–429. [Google Scholar]
  18. Yáñez, J.M.; Joshi, R.; Yoshida, G.M. Genomics to Accelerate Genetic Improvement in Tilapia. Anim. Genet. 2020, 51, 658–674. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Triantaphyllopoulos, K.A.; Cartas, D.; Miliou, H. Factors Influencing GH and IGF-I Gene Expression on Growth in Teleost Fish: How Can Aquaculture Industry Benefit? Rev. Aquac. 2020, 12, 1637–1662. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Eze, F. Marker-assisted selection in fish: A review. Asian J. Fish. Aquat. Res. 2019, 3, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Duan, B.; Kang, T.; Wan, H.; Liu, W.; Zhang, F.; Mu, S.; Guan, Y.; Li, Z.; Tian, Y.; Kang, X. Microsatellite Markers Reveal Genetic Diversity and Population Structure of Portunus trituberculatus in the Bohai Sea, China. Sci. Rep. 2023, 13, 8668. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Thomas, B.L.; Gomelsky, B.; Delomas, T.A.; Novelo, N.D. Genetic variability of Oreochromis niloticus strains as determined by microsatellite DNA markers. N. Am. J. Aquac. 2021, 83, 177–183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Wenne, R. Single Nucleotide Polymorphism Markers with Applications in Conservation and Exploitation of Aquatic Natural Populations. Animals 2023, 13, 1089. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Chishty, S.M.S.; Chotipuntu, P.; Direkbusarakom, S.; Wuthisuthimethavee, S. Identification of growth-related EST-derived microsatellite marker in Oreochromis niloticus. Walailak J. Sci. Technol. 2020, 17, 867–879. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Van Oppen, M.J.H.; Coleman, M.A. Advancing the protection of marine life through genomics. PLoS Biol. 2022, 20, e3001801. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Ndandala, C.B.; Dai, M.; Mustapha, U.F.; Li, X.; Liu, J.; Huang, H.; Li, G.; Chen, H. Current research and future perspectives of GH and IGFs family genes in somatic growth and reproduction of teleost fish. Aquac. Rep. 2022, 26, 101289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. El-Sayed, A.F.M.; Fitzsimmons, K. From Africa to the world—The journey of Oreochromis niloticus. Rev. Aquac. 2023, 15, 6–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Barría, A.; Trịnh, T.Q.; Mahmuddin, M.; Peñaloza, C.; Papadopoulou, A.; Gervais, O.; Chadag, V.M.; Benzie, J.A.H.; Houston, R.D. A major quantitative trait locus affecting resistance to tilapia lake virus in farmed Oreochromis niloticus. Heredity 2021, 127, 334–343. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Ponzoni, R.W.; Nguyen, N.H.; Khaw, H.L.; Hamzah, A.; Bakar, K.R.A.; Yee, H.Y. Genetic improvement of Oreochromis niloticus with special reference to the work conducted by the WorldFish Center with the GIFT strain. Rev. Aquac. 2011, 3, 27–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Neira, R.; García, X.; Lhorente, J.P.; Filp, M.; Yáñez, J.M.; Cascante, A.M. Evaluation of the Growth and Carcass Quality of Diallel Crosses of Four Strains of Nile Tilapia (Oerochromis niloticus). Aquaculture 2016, 451, 213–222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Qiao, T.F.; Jiao, J.P.; Huang, D.D.; Liu, Z.M.; Wen, J.P.; Wang, Z.B.; Xia, J.H. Genome-wide identification of DNA methylation marks associated with resistance to Streptococcus agalactiae in the GIFT strain of Oreochromis niloticus. Aquaculture 2025, 595, 741530. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Awad, S.T.; Hemeda, S.A.; El Nahas, A.F.; Abbas, E.M.; Abdel-Razek, M.A.S.; Ismail, M.; Mamoon, A.; Ali, F.S. Gender-specific responses in gene expression of Oreochromis niloticus to heavy metal pollution in different aquatic habitats. Sci. Rep. 2024, 14, 14671. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Zouakh, D.E.; Chebel, F.; Bouaziz, A.; Kara, M.H. Reproduction, age and growth of Tilapia zillii (Cichlidae) in Oued Righ wetland (southeast Algeria). Cybium 2016, 40, 235–243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Zhang, C.; Zhang, Y.; Liu, C.; Wang, L.; Dong, Y.; Sun, D.; Wen, H.; Zhang, K.; Qi, X.; Li, Y. Genome-wide association study and genomic prediction for growth traits in spotted sea bass (Lateolabrax maculatus) using insertion and deletion markers. Anim. Res. One Health 2024, 2, 400–416. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Johnston, S.E.; Orell, P.; Pritchard, V.L.; Kent, M.P.; Lien, S.; Niemelä, E.; Erkinaro, J.; Primmer, C.R. Genome-wide SNP analysis reveals a genetic basis for sea-age variation in a wild population of Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar). Mol. Ecol. 2014, 23, 3452–3468. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Zhang, C.; Wen, H.; Zhang, Y.; Zhang, K.; Qi, X.; Li, Y. First Genome-Wide Association Study and Genomic Prediction for Growth Traits in Spotted Sea Bass (Lateolabrax maculatus) Using Whole-Genome Resequencing. Aquaculture 2023, 566, 739194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Ali, F.S.; Nazmi, H.M.; Abdelaty, B.S.; El-Far, A.M.; Goda, A.M. Genetic improvement of farmed Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus) through selective breeding in Egypt. Int. J. Fish. Aquat. Stud. 2017, 5, 395–401. [Google Scholar]
  38. Abd El-Hack, M.E.; El-Saadony, M.T.; Nader, M.M.; Salem, H.M.; El-Tahan, A.M.; Soliman, S.M.; Khafaga, A.F. Effect of environmental factors on growth performance of Oreochromis niloticus. Int. J. Biometeorol. 2022, 66, 2183–2194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. El-Greisy, Z.A.; El-Gamal, A.E. Monosex production of tilapia, Oreochromis niloticus, using different doses of 17α-methyltestosterone with respect to the degree of sex stability after one year of treatment. Egypt. J. Aquat. Res. 2012, 38, 59–66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Gunasekera, R.M.; Shim, K.F.; Lam, T.J. Influence of Protein Content of Broodstock Diets on Larval Quality and Performance in Nile Tilapia, Oreochromis niloticus (L.). Aquaculture 1996, 146, 245–259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Fujimura, K.; Okada, N. Development of the embryo, larva and early juvenile of Nile tilapia Oreochromis niloticus (Pisces: Cichlidae): Developmental staging system. Devel. Growth Different. 2007, 49, 301–324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. El-Sayed, A.F.M. Reproduction and seed production. In Tilapia Culture; CABI Publishing: Wallingford, UK, 2006; pp. 112–138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Asahida, T.; Kobayashi, T.; Saitoh, K.; Nakayama, I. Tissue preservation and total DNA extraction from fish stored at ambient temperature using buffers containing high concentration of urea. Fish. Sci. 1996, 62, 727–730. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Untergasser, A.; Cutcutache, I.; Koressaar, T.; Ye, J.; Faircloth, B.C.; Remm, M.; Rozen, S.G. Primer3—New capabilities and interfaces. Nucl. Acids Res. 2012, 40, e115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Megahed, E.T.; Abbas, E.M.; El Nahas, A.F.; Hemeda, S.A. Genetic variation of Diplodus sargus and Diplodus vulgaris in four Mediterranean coastal regions of Egypt based on microsatellites. Egypt. J. Aquat. Biol. Fish. 2020, 24, 203–215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Ewing, B.; Green, P. Base-calling of automated sequencer traces using phred. II. Error probabilities. Genome Res. 1998, 8, 186–194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Hall, T.A. BioEdit: A user-friendly biological sequence alignment editor and analysis program for Windows 95/98/NT. Nucleic Acids Symp. Ser. 1999, 41, 95–98. [Google Scholar]
  48. Dereeper, A.; Homa, F.; Andres, G.; Sempere, G.; Sarah, G.; Hueber, Y.; Dufayard, J.-F.; Ruiz, M. SNiPlay3: A web-based application for exploration and large-scale analyses of genomic variations. Nucleic Acids Res. 2015, 43, W295–W300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Danecek, P.; Auton, A.; Abecasis, G.; Albers, C.A.; Banks, E.; DePristo, M.A.; Handsaker, R.E.; Lunter, G.; Marth, G.T.; Sherry, S.T.; et al. The variant call format and VCFtools. Bioinformatics 2011, 27, 2156–2158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Pritchard, J.K.; Stephens, M.; Donnelly, P. Inference of Population Structure Using Multilocus Genotype Data. Genetics 2000, 155, 945–959. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Rosenberg, G. A Place for Consciousness: Probing the Deep Structure of the Natural World; Oxford University Press: Oxford, UK, 2004; ISBN 0190290587. [Google Scholar]
  52. Ritland, K. Estimators for pairwise relatedness and individual inbreeding coefficients. Genet. Res. 1996, 67, 175–185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Hardy, O.J.; Vekemans, X. SPAGeDi: A versatile computer program to analyse spatial genetic structure at the individual or population levels. Mol. Ecol. Notes 2002, 2, 618–620. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Bradbury, P.J.; Zhang, Z.; Kroon, D.E.; Casstevens, T.M.; Ramdoss, Y.; Buckler, E.S. TASSEL: Software for Association Mapping of Complex Traits in Diverse Samples. Bioinformatics 2007, 23, 2633–2635. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Cappa, E.P.; Martínez, M.C.; Garcia, M.N.; Villalba, P.V.; Marcucci Poltri, S.N. Effect of population structure and kinship relationships on the results of association mapping tests of growth and wood quality traits in four Eucalyptus populations. BMC Proc. 2011, 5, P23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Benjamini, Y.; Hochberg, Y. Controlling the false discovery rate: A practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. J. R. Stat. Soc. Series B Methodol. 1995, 57, 289–300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Barrett, J.C.; Fry, B.; Maller, J.; Daly, M.J. Haploview: Analysis and visualization of LD and haplotype maps. Bioinformatics 2005, 21, 263–265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Gabriel, S.B.; Schaffner, S.F.; Nguyen, H.; Moore, J.M.; Roy, J.; Blumenstiel, B.; Higgins, J.; DeFelice, M.; Lochner, A.; Faggart, M. The structure of haplotype blocks in the human genome. Science 2002, 296, 2225–2229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Abo-Al-Ela, H.G.; El-Nahas, A.F.; Mahmoud, S.; Ibrahim, E.M. The extent to which immunity, apoptosis and detoxification gene expression interact with 17 alpha-methyltestosterone. Fish Shellfish Immunol. 2017, 60, 289–298. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. El-Leithy, A.A.A.; Hemeda, S.A.; El Naby, W.S.H.A.; El Nahas, A.F.; Hassan, S.A.H.; Awad, S.T.; El-Deeb, S.I.; Helmy, Z.A. Optimum salinity for Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus) growth and mRNA transcripts of ion-regulation, inflammatory, stress- and immune-related genes. Fish Physiol. Biochem. 2019, 45, 1217–1232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Ming, C.; Rui, W.; Liping, L.; Huang, T.; Weiyi, H.; Jian, L.; Chao, L.; Aiying, L.; Honglin, L.; Wanwen, L. Sequence and evolution differences of Oreochromis niloticus CXC contribute to the diversification of cellular immune responses in tilapias with treatment of Streptococcus iniae. J. Anim. Vet. Adv. 2013, 12, 303–313. Available online: http://docsdrive.com/pdfs/medwelljournals/javaa/2013/303-311.pdf (accessed on 1 March 2024).
  62. Elkatatny, N.M.; El Nahas, A.F.; Helal, M.A.; Fahmy, H.A.; Tanekhy, M. The impacts of seasonal variation on the immune status of Nile tilapia larvae and their response to different immunostimulants feed additives. Fish Shellfish Immunol. 2020, 96, 270–278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Ghazy, H.A.; Abdel-Razek, M.A.S.; El Nahas, A.F.; Mahmoud, S. Assessment of complex water pollution with heavy metals and pyrethroid pesticides on transcript levels of metallothionein and immune related genes. Fish Shellfish Immunol. 2017, 68, 318–326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Puerto, M.; Gutierrez-Praena, D.; Prieto, A.; Pichardo, S.; Jos, A.; Miguel-Carrasco, J.L.; Vazquez, C.M.; Cameán, A.M. Subchronic Effects of Cyanobacterial Cells on the Transcription of Antioxidant Enzyme Genes in Tilapia Nilotica (Oreochromis niloticus). Ecotoxicology 2011, 20, 479–490. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Phumyu, N.; Boonanuntanasarn, S.; Jangprai, A.; Yoshizaki, G.; Na-Nakorn, U. Pubertal effects of 17 alpha-methyltestosterone on GH-IGF-related genes of the hypothalamic–pituitary–liver–gonadal axis and other biological parameters in male, female and sex-reversed Nile tilapia. Gen. Comp. Endocrinol. 2012, 177, 278–292. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Pholchamat, S.; Vialle, R.; Luang-In, V.; Phadee, P.; Wang, B.; Wang, T.; Secombes, C.J.; Wangkahart, E. Evaluation of the efficacy of MONTANIDETM GR01, a new adjuvant for feed-based vaccines, on the immune response and protection against Streptococcus agalactiae in oral vaccinated Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus) under laboratory and on-farm conditions. Fish Shellfish Immunol. 2024, 149, 109567. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Ruenkoed, S.; Pholoeng, A.; Nontasan, S.; Panprommin, D.; Mongkolwit, K.; Wangkahart, E. Assessing the impact of acidifiers on growth performance, innate immune capacity, response to ammonia nitrogen stress, digestive enzyme activity, intestinal histology, and gene expression of Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus). Fish Shellfish Immunol. 2025, 162, 110315. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Tawfik, W.; Nassef, E.; Bakr, A.; Hegazi, E.; Ismail, T.A.; Abdelazim, A.M.; El-Nagar, S.H.; Sabike, I.; Fadl, S.E.; Sharoba, A.M. Orange pulp in Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus) diets: Growth performance, biochemical parameters and gene expression for growth and fat metabolism. Aqua. Rep. 2022, 22, 100970. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Rao, X.; Huang, X.; Zhou, Z.; Lin, X. An improvement of the 2(−ΔΔCT) method for quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction data analysis. Biostat. Bioinformat. Biomathemat. 2013, 3, 71–85. [Google Scholar]
  70. Musa, A.M.; Mohammed, E.B.; Alla, A.A.A.; Alfatih, W.M.; Manofal, A.M. Evaluation study on the growth performance of four local strains of Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus) in Sudan. Aquat. Sci. Technol. 2021, 9, 1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Teichert, N.; Lizé, A.; Cabral, H.; Acou, A.; Trancart, T.; Virag, L.S.; Feunteun, E.; Carpentier, A. Decoupling carry-over effects from environment in fish nursery grounds. Sci. Total Environ. 2023, 857, 159487. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. O’Connor, C.M.; Cooke, S.J. Ecological carryover effects complicate conservation. Ambio 2015, 44, 582–591. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Jaser, S.K.K.; Dias, M.A.D.; Lago, A.d.A.; Reis Neto, R.V.; Hilsdorf, A.W.S. Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms in the Growth Hormone Gene of Oreochromis niloticus and Their Association with Growth Performance. Aquac. Res. 2017, 48, 5835–5845. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Abdel-Tawwab, M. Comparative growth performance and feed utilization of four local strains of Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus). In Proceedings of the Sixth International Symposium on Tilapia in Aquaculture, Manila, Philippines, 12–16 September 2004; Volume 11, pp. 510–517. Available online: http://hdl.handle.net/10576/9845 (accessed on 1 March 2004).
  75. Chen, B.; Xiao, W.; Zou, Z.; Zhu, J.; Li, D.; Yu, J.; Yang, H. Ghrelin gene single nucleotide polymorphisms and their effects on Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus) growth. Aquac. Rep. 2020, 18, 100469. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. El-Far, A.; Aly, W.; El-Haweet, A.E.D.; Nasr-Allah, A.; Karisa, H. Fisheries management based on gear selectivity of a tropical reservoir, Lake Nasser, Egypt. Egypt. J. Aquat. Res. 2020, 46, 71–77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Faggion, S.; Vandeputte, M.; Vergnet, A.; Clota, F.; Blanc, M.O.; Sanchez, P.; Ruelle, F.; Allal, F. Sex dimorphism in European sea bass (Dicentrarchus labrax L.): New insights into sex-related growth patterns during very early life stages. PLoS ONE 2021, 16, e0239791. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Wan, Z.Y.; Lin, G.; Yue, G. Genes for sexual body size dimorphism in hybrid tilapia (Oreochromis sp. × Oreochromis mossambicus). Aquac. Fish. 2019, 4, 231–238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Cleveland, B.M.; Weber, G.M. Effects of sex steroids on expression of genes regulating growth-related mechanisms in rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss). Gen. Comp. Endocrinol. 2015, 216, 103–115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Wang, C.; Liu, B.; Chen, M.; Ning, J.; Lu, X.; Wang, C. Mutations in growth-related genes induced by EMS treatment in scallops. Front. Genet. 2022, 13, 879844. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Hu, Z.; Holzschuh, J.; Driever, W. Loss of DDB1 leads to transcriptional P53 pathway activation in proliferating cells, cell cycle deregulation, and apoptosis in zebrafish embryos. PLoS ONE 2015, 10, e0134299. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Li, Z.; Pearlman, A.H.; Hsieh, P. DNA mismatch repair and the DNA damage response. DNA Rep. 2016, 38, 94–101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Mohamed, E.; Hussein, M.; El-Geziry, T.M.; Beltagy, A.; Sheta, M. Water exchange characteristics between Lake Burullus and the Mediterranean Sea. Egypt. J. Aquat. Biol. Fish. 2022, 26, 427–442. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Abdelazim, N.M.; Mohamed, B.A.; Abdel-Fattah, S. Egyptian Coastal Lakes and Wetlands: Part II Climate Change and Biodiversity; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2019; Volume 49, ISBN 9783319936109. [Google Scholar]
  85. Salih, S.Q.; Allawi, M.F.; Yousif, A.A.; Armanuos, A.M.; Saggi, M.K.; Ali, M.; Shahid, S.; Al-Ansari, N.; Yaseen, Z.M.; Chau, K.W. Viability of the advanced adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system model on reservoir evaporation process simulation: Case study of Nasser Lake in Egypt. Eng. Appl. Comput. Fluid Mech. 2019, 13, 878–891. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Farhat, H.I.; Aly, W. Effect of site on sedimentological characteristics and metal pollution in two semi-enclosed embayments of great freshwater reservoir: Lake Nasser, Egypt. J. Afr. Earth Sci. 2018, 141, 194–206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Kadry, S.M.; Tayel, S.I.; Afify, M.F.H.; El-Sayed, R.A. Eco-histopathological studies Oreochromis niloticus fish living in Damietta Branch in Egypt. World J. Pharm. Sci. 2015, 3, 815–825. [Google Scholar]
  88. Osman, A.G.M.; Abuel-Fadl, K.Y.; Kloas, W. In situ evaluation of the genotoxic potential of the River Nile: II. Detection of DNA strand-breakage and apoptosis in Oreochromis niloticus niloticus (Linnaeus, 1758) and Clarias gariepinus (Burchell, 1822). Mut. Res. Genet. Toxicol. Environ. Mut. 2012, 747, 14–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Abdel-Aal, E.I.; Haroon, A.M.; Ibrahim, S.M.; Abd El-Aziz, G.S.; Sabae, S.A.; Gaber, K.M.; Goher, M.E. Ecological status of Lake Nasser khors, Egypt, before operating the Grand Ethiopian Renaissance Dam. Stoch. Environ. Res. Risk Assess. 2023, 37, 1229–1245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Shaltout, K.H.; Khalil, M.T.; Al-Sodany, Y.M. Lake Burullus: Burullus Protected Area; Publication of National Biodiversity Unit No. 13; Egyptian Environmental Affairs Agency: Cairo, Egypt, 2005. [Google Scholar]
  91. Marsh, J.N.; Vega-Trejo, R.; Jennions, M.D.; Head, M.L. Why does inbreeding reduce male paternity? Effects on sexually selected traits. Evolution 2017, 71, 2728–2737. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Hamilton, P.B.; Rolshausen, G.; Uren Webster, T.M.; Tyler, C.R. Adaptive capabilities and fitness consequences associated with pollution exposure in fish. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 2017, 372, 20160042. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Houston, R.D.; Bean, T.P.; Macqueen, D.J.; Gundappa, M.K.; Jin, Y.H.; Jenkins, T.L.; Selly, S.L.C.; Martin, S.A.M.; Stevens, J.R.; Santos, E.M. Harnessing genomics to fast-track genetic improvement in aquaculture. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2020, 21, 389–409. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Dunham, R. Aquaculture and Fisheries Biotechnology: Genetic Approaches; CABI: Wallingford, UK, 2023; ISBN 1789243467. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Robledo, D.; Ogwang, J.; Byakora, E.; Nascimento-Schulze, J.C.; Benda, K.K.; Fraslin, C.; Salisbury, S.; Solimo, M.; Mayega, J.F.; Peter, B. Genetic Diversity and Population Structure of Farmed and Wild Nile Tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus) in Uganda: The Potential for Aquaculture Selection and Breeding Programs. Genomics 2024, 116, 110781. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Kajungiro, R.A.; Palaiokostas, C.; Pinto, F.A.L.; Mmochi, A.J.; Mtolera, M.; Houston, R.D.; de Koning, D.J. Population Structure and Genetic Diversity of Nile Tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus) Strains Cultured in Tanzania. Front. Genet. 2019, 10, 1269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Fagbémi, M.N.A.; Pigneur, L.-M.; André, A.; Smitz, N.; Gennotte, V.; Michaux, J.R.; Mélard, C.; Lalèyè, P.A.; Rougeot, C. Genetic Structure of Wild and Farmed Nile Tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus) Populations in Benin Based on Genome Wide SNP Technology. Aquaculture 2021, 535, 736432. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. García-Fernández, C.; Sánchez, J.A.; Blanco, G. SNP-Haplotypes: An Accurate Approach for Parentage and Relatedness Inference in Gilthead Sea Bream (Sparus aurata). Aquaculture 2018, 495, 582–591. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Cuevas-Rodríguez, B.L.; Sifuentes-Rincón, A.M.; Ambriz-Morales, P.; García-Ulloa, M.; Valdez-González, F.J.; Rodríguez-González, H. Novel Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms in Candidate Genes for Growth in Tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus). Rev. Bras. Zootec. 2016, 45, 345–348. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Li, M.J.; Liu, W.S.; Luo, W.; Zhang, X.Q.; Zhu, W.L.; Wang, J.; Liao, L.Y.; Li, G.H. Polymorphisms and Their Association with Growth Traits in the Growth Hormone Gene of Yellow Catfish, Pelteobagrus fulvidraco. Aquaculture 2017, 469, 117–123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Naby, H.A.E.; Aboukila, R.S.; Hemeda, S.A.E.; El Nahas, A.F.; El Naby, W.S. Molecular Characterization of GHR1 Gene and Expression Analysis of Some Growth-Related Genes in Oreochromis niloticus. Adv. Anim. Vet. Sci. 2021, 9, 1025–1033. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Parker, G.A. The Evolution of Sexual Size Dimorphism in Fish. J. Fish Biol. 1992, 41, 1–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Jonsson, B.; Jonsson, N. Early Environment Influences Later Performance in Fishes. J. Fish Biol. 2014, 85, 151–188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. Syed, R.; Masood, Z.; Ul Hassan, H.; Khan, W.; Mushtaq, S.; Ali, A.; Gul, Y.; Jafari, H.; Habib, A.; Ishaq Ali Shah, M.; et al. Growth Performance, Haematological Assessment and Chemical Composition of Nile Tilapia, Oreochromis niloticus (Linnaeus, 1758) Fed Different Levels of Aloe vera Extract as Feed Additives in a Closed Aquaculture System. Saudi J. Biol. Sci. 2022, 29, 296–303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  105. Sem, A.; Ap, M.; Mg, O. Broodstock Fecundity and Fry Survivability in Nile Tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus): Effects of Dietary Nucleotide Supplementation in an on-Farm Feeding Trial. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Fisheries and Aquaculture, Barcelona, Spain, 9–10 September 2024; Volume 11, pp. 1–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. Christie, M.R.; Marine, M.L.; Fox, S.E.; French, R.A.; Blouin, M.S. A Single Generation of Domestication Heritably Alters the Expression of Hundreds of Genes. Nat. Commun. 2016, 7, 10676. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  107. Mahboub, H.H.; Eltanahy, A.; Omran, A.; Mansour, A.T.; Safhi, F.A.; Alwutayd, K.M.; Khamis, T.; Husseiny, W.A.; Ismail, S.H.; Yousefi, M.; et al. Chitosan Nanogel Aqueous Treatment Improved Blood Biochemicals, Antioxidant Capacity, Immune Response, Immune-Related Gene Expression and Infection Resistance of Nile Tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus). Comp. Biochem. Physiol. Part B Biochem. Mol. Biol. 2024, 269, 110876. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Mahboub, H.H.; Elsheshtawy, H.M.; Sheraiba, N.I.; Fahmy, E.M.; Masoud, S.R.; Mohamed, E.A.A.; Abdelnaeim, N.S.; Mohamed, D.I.; Ismail, T.A.; Ahmed, S.A.A. Dietary Black Cumin (Nigella sativa) Improved Hemato-Biochemical, Oxidative Stress, Gene Expression, and Immunological Response of Nile Tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus) Infected by Burkholderia cepacia. Aquac. Rep. 2022, 22, 100943. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Fuentes, E.N.; Valdés, J.A.; Molina, A.; Björnsson, B.T. Regulation of skeletal muscle growth in fish by the growth hormone–insulin-like growth factor system. Gen. Comp. Endocrinol. 2013, 192, 136–148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Opazo, R.; Valladares, L.; Romero, J. Comparison of gene expression patterns of key growth genes between different rate growths in zebrafish (Danio rerio) siblings. Lat. Am. J. Aquat. Res 2017, 45, 766–775. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Devlin, R.H.; Sakhrani, D.; Tymchuk, W.E.; Rise, M.L.; Goh, B. Domestication and growth hormone transgenesis cause similar changes in gene expression in coho salmon (Oncorhynchus kisutch). Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2009, 106, 3047–3052. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  112. Jeay, S.; Sonenshein, G.E.; Postel-Vinay, M.-C.; Kelly, P.A.; Baixeras, E. Growth hormone can act as a cytokine controlling survival and proliferation of immune cells: New insights into signaling pathways. Mol. Cell. Endocrinol. 2002, 188, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  113. Yada, T. Growth hormone and fish immune system. Gen. Comp. Endocrinol. 2007, 152, 353–358. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  114. Franz, A.C.; Faass, O.; Kollner, B.; Shved, N.; Link, K.; Casanova, A.; Wenger, M.; D’cotta, H.; Baroiller, J.F.; Ullrich, O. Endocrine and local IGF-I in the bony fish immune system. Biology 2016, 5, 9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  115. Zhu, W.; Su, J. Immune functions of phagocytic blood cells in teleost. Rev. Aquac. 2022, 14, 630–646. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  116. Pontigo, J.P.; Vargas-Chacoff, L. Growth hormone (GH) and growth hormone release factor (GRF) modulate the immune response in the SHK-1 cell line and leukocyte cultures of head kidney in Atlantic salmon. Gen. Comp. Endocrinol. 2021, 300, 113631. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  117. Shved, N.; Berishvili, G.; Mazel, P.; Baroiller, J.F.; Eppler, E. Growth hormone (GH) treatment acts on the endocrine and autocrine/paracrine GH/IGF-axis and on TNF-α expression in bony fish pituitary and immune organs. Fish Shellfish Immunol. 2011, 31, 944–952. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  118. Nakharuthai, C.; Srisapoome, P. Molecular Identification and Dual Functions of Two Different CXC Chemokines in Nile Tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus) against Streptococcus agalactiae and Flavobacterium columnare. Microorganisms 2020, 8, 1058. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  119. Hanna, M.I.; El Sayed, A.T.; El Megeed, O.H.A.; Ibrahim, M.A.; Korany, R.M.S.; Attia, M.M. Assessment of a New Protocol Strategy to Control the Ectoparasitic Infestation in Nile Tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus) Using Efficient Natural Products. BMC Vet. Res. 2025, 21, 15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  120. Chovatia, R.M.; Acharya, A.; Rasal, K.D.; Bedekar, M.K.; Jeena, K.; Rathinam, R.B.; Dinakaran, C.; Tripathi, G. Ontogeny and Tissue Specific Expression Profiles of Recombination Activating Genes (RAGs) during Development in Nile Tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus). Gene Expr. Patterns 2024, 52, 119358. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  121. Lee, J.W.; Kim, J.E.; Goo, I.B.; Hwang, J.A.; Im, J.H.; Choi, H.S.; Lee, J.H. Expression of Immune-Related Genes during Loach (Misgurnus anguillicaudatus) Embryonic and Early Larval Development. Devel. Reprod. 2015, 19, 181–187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  122. Lee, J.-W.; Yang, H.; Noh, J.K.; Kim, H.C.; Park, C.-J.; Park, J.-W.; Hwang, I.J.; Kim, S.Y.; Lee, J.-H. RAG-1 and IgM genes, markers for early development of the immune system in Olive Flounder (Paralichthys olivaceus). Devel. Reproduct. 2014, 18, 99–106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Nile Tilapia sampling locations: Lake Brullus, El-Qanater (River Nile), and Lake Nasser, taken after [32].
Figure 1. Nile Tilapia sampling locations: Lake Brullus, El-Qanater (River Nile), and Lake Nasser, taken after [32].
Animals 15 02097 g001
Figure 2. Comparison of body length (A) and body weight (B) among male and female Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus) from three different populations: Lake Nasser, El-Qanater, and Lake Brullus. Bars represent the mean ± SE. (*) indicate significant differences between groups based on a two-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s post hoc test (p ≤ 0.05). Different lowercase letters above bars in panel A denote significant differences within the opposite sexes across locations.
Figure 2. Comparison of body length (A) and body weight (B) among male and female Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus) from three different populations: Lake Nasser, El-Qanater, and Lake Brullus. Bars represent the mean ± SE. (*) indicate significant differences between groups based on a two-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s post hoc test (p ≤ 0.05). Different lowercase letters above bars in panel A denote significant differences within the opposite sexes across locations.
Animals 15 02097 g002
Figure 3. SNPs with MAF > 1% within GH gene across 155 genotypes from six populations of Nile Tilapia.
Figure 3. SNPs with MAF > 1% within GH gene across 155 genotypes from six populations of Nile Tilapia.
Animals 15 02097 g003
Figure 4. SNP-based STRUCTURE analyses of Nile tilapia male and female genotypes: (A) The magnitude of ∆K as a function of K (i.e., the number of defined groups). (B) SNP-based STRUCTURE defined groups among six populations for K = 2. Yellow and blue are colors representing group 1 and group 2.
Figure 4. SNP-based STRUCTURE analyses of Nile tilapia male and female genotypes: (A) The magnitude of ∆K as a function of K (i.e., the number of defined groups). (B) SNP-based STRUCTURE defined groups among six populations for K = 2. Yellow and blue are colors representing group 1 and group 2.
Animals 15 02097 g004
Figure 5. Boxplot diagrams depicting the genetic effects of SNPs with significant association with (A) body length and (B) body weight in Nile tilapia.
Figure 5. Boxplot diagrams depicting the genetic effects of SNPs with significant association with (A) body length and (B) body weight in Nile tilapia.
Animals 15 02097 g005
Figure 6. Haplotype block map for all nine SNPs. Linkage disequilibrium (LD) plots containing nine SNPs from the GH gene of Nile tilapia. LD is measured as D’, ranging from 0 to 1. D’ value equals 1 is depicted in red, and less than 1 is depicted in shades of pink/light red, light blue, and white. The black lines mark the identified blocks.
Figure 6. Haplotype block map for all nine SNPs. Linkage disequilibrium (LD) plots containing nine SNPs from the GH gene of Nile tilapia. LD is measured as D’, ranging from 0 to 1. D’ value equals 1 is depicted in red, and less than 1 is depicted in shades of pink/light red, light blue, and white. The black lines mark the identified blocks.
Animals 15 02097 g006
Figure 7. Ballon plot of the effect of SNP/InDel on the average body length (A) and body weight (B) in six broad stock populations of Nile tilapia. Females Lake Nasser (FA), females EL-Qanater (FQ), females Lake Brullus (FB), males Lake Nasser (MA), males EL-Qanater (MQ), and males Lake Brullus (MB).
Figure 7. Ballon plot of the effect of SNP/InDel on the average body length (A) and body weight (B) in six broad stock populations of Nile tilapia. Females Lake Nasser (FA), females EL-Qanater (FQ), females Lake Brullus (FB), males Lake Nasser (MA), males EL-Qanater (MQ), and males Lake Brullus (MB).
Animals 15 02097 g007
Figure 8. Gene expression of growth-related genes, growth hormone (GH) (A), and insulin growth factor I (IGFI) (B) of Oreochromis niloticus larvae 72 h post-hatching. C is the control, B is Lake Brullus, A is Lake Nasser, and Q is El-Qanater F1. Different lowercase letters above bars denote significant differences between different larval groups (p < 0.05).
Figure 8. Gene expression of growth-related genes, growth hormone (GH) (A), and insulin growth factor I (IGFI) (B) of Oreochromis niloticus larvae 72 h post-hatching. C is the control, B is Lake Brullus, A is Lake Nasser, and Q is El-Qanater F1. Different lowercase letters above bars denote significant differences between different larval groups (p < 0.05).
Animals 15 02097 g008
Figure 9. Gene expression of proinflammatory-related genes, interleukin 1 beta (IL1β) (A), interleukin 8 (IL8) (B), CXC2-chemokine (CXC2) (C), CC-chemokine (CC) (D), and tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNFα) (E) in Oreochromis niloticus larvae 72 h post-hatching. C is the control, B is Lake Brullus, A is Lake Nasser, and Q is El-Qanater F1. Different lowercase letters above bars denote significant differences between different larval groups (p < 0.05).
Figure 9. Gene expression of proinflammatory-related genes, interleukin 1 beta (IL1β) (A), interleukin 8 (IL8) (B), CXC2-chemokine (CXC2) (C), CC-chemokine (CC) (D), and tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNFα) (E) in Oreochromis niloticus larvae 72 h post-hatching. C is the control, B is Lake Brullus, A is Lake Nasser, and Q is El-Qanater F1. Different lowercase letters above bars denote significant differences between different larval groups (p < 0.05).
Animals 15 02097 g009
Figure 10. Gene expression of early immune system development-related gene, recombinant reactivating gene (Rag) (A), and early neural development-related gene, sacsin protein (sacs) (B) in Oreochromis niloticus larvae 72 h post-hatching. C is the control, B is Lake Brullus, A is Lake Nasser, and Q is El-Qanater F1. Different lowercase letters above bars denote significant differences between different larval groups (p < 0.05).
Figure 10. Gene expression of early immune system development-related gene, recombinant reactivating gene (Rag) (A), and early neural development-related gene, sacsin protein (sacs) (B) in Oreochromis niloticus larvae 72 h post-hatching. C is the control, B is Lake Brullus, A is Lake Nasser, and Q is El-Qanater F1. Different lowercase letters above bars denote significant differences between different larval groups (p < 0.05).
Animals 15 02097 g010
Table 1. Code, forward, and reverse sequences of primers utilized in quantitative real-time PCR.
Table 1. Code, forward, and reverse sequences of primers utilized in quantitative real-time PCR.
Gene Name
and Code
Forward Primer
(5′-3′)
Reverse Primer
(5′-3′)
Target Size (bp)Linkage GroupAccession NumberReference
CXC2 chemokineCTATCCATGGAGCCTCAGGTCTTCTTGAGCGTGGCAATAA146LG6XM_003452201.5[59]
Interleukin-1 Beta (IL1β)AGAGCAGCAATTCAGAGCGTGCTGATGTACCAGT514LG12XM_019365842.2[60]
Interleukin-8 (IL8)GCACTGCCGCTGCATTAAGGCAGTGGGAGTTGGGAAGAA85LG6XM_019359413.2[61]
CC-chemokineACAGAGCCGATCTTGGGTTACTTGTGAAGGAGAGGCGGTGGATGTTAT228LG9XM_019362411.2 [60]
“Recombination Activating
Gene1 (rag1)”
AAGACAGTGCCTGCACATCACTCAGGAACAACTGGTCCCC104LG7XM_019361952.2 [62]
Sacsin gene (sacs)ACATCACTGATAGCACCCGCTCATGGTGGGATCTGGACCT82LG14XM_019367592.2[62]
Tumer necrosis factorα (TNFα)GGTTAGTTGAGAAGAAATCACCTGCAGTCGTCGCTATTCCCGCAGATCA407LG11NM_001279533.1[63]
Insulin like growth factor1 (IGF1)TTGTCTGTGGAGAG CGAGGCTCAGCTTTGGAAGCA GCACTCGT202LG17XM_019346352.2[60]
Growth hormone (GH)TAATGGGAGAGGGA AGATGGCTCTGCGATGTAAT TCAGGA90LG4XM_003442542[64]
βeta-actinTGG CAA TGA GAG GTT CCGTGCTGTTGTAGGTGGTTTCG136LG4XM_003443127.5[65]
Table 2. Associations between SNPs/indels and body length and weight in GH gene of Nile tilapia showing the SNP number, and its attributable % of phenotypic variance (R2). Listed associations were significant at p ≤ 0.05 and were verified by the false discovery rate method.
Table 2. Associations between SNPs/indels and body length and weight in GH gene of Nile tilapia showing the SNP number, and its attributable % of phenotypic variance (R2). Listed associations were significant at p ≤ 0.05 and were verified by the false discovery rate method.
AttributeSNP/InDelPosition in
Consensus
Sequence
p-Value% Phenotypic
Variance (R2)
Body lengthSNP1 *360.0064.9
SNP21160.023.5
SNP52110.0163.8
SNP62400.0153.8
SNP73300.0084.5
SNP8 *4920.0074.7
InDel15720.0054.9
InDel2 *581014.8
InDel3 *582023.4
Body weightSNP1 *360.0283.1
SNP31340.0422.6
SNP41740.0452.6
SNP8 *4920.0293.1
SNP95390.0283.1
InDel2 *581018.2
InDel3 *582036.0
* Common associations with body length and body weight.
Table 3. Number of genotypes per population with significant SNPs and InDels identified in the GH gene in six Nile tilapia populations.
Table 3. Number of genotypes per population with significant SNPs and InDels identified in the GH gene in six Nile tilapia populations.
SNP/InDelFA FQFBMAMQMB
SNP1 81
SNP2 4
SNP3 6
SNP4 5
SNP511 95
SNP612 756
SNP7 23
SNP8 61
SNP9 6
InDel1 8 1
InDel2 81 81
InDel310 6
Total 12119393812
Females Lake Nasser (FA), females EL-Qanater (FQ), females Lake Brullus (FB), males Lake Nasser (MA), males EL-Qanater (MQ), males Lake Brullus (MB).
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Ali, F.S.; Awad, S.T.; Ismail, M.; Hemeda, S.A.; El Nahas, A.F.; Abbas, E.M.; Mamoon, A.; Nazmi, H.; El-Haroun, E. Selection for Growth Performance in Oreochromis niloticus Across Different Aquatic Environments Using Growth Hormone Gene Polymorphisms. Animals 2025, 15, 2097. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani15142097

AMA Style

Ali FS, Awad ST, Ismail M, Hemeda SA, El Nahas AF, Abbas EM, Mamoon A, Nazmi H, El-Haroun E. Selection for Growth Performance in Oreochromis niloticus Across Different Aquatic Environments Using Growth Hormone Gene Polymorphisms. Animals. 2025; 15(14):2097. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani15142097

Chicago/Turabian Style

Ali, Fawzia S., Simone T. Awad, Mohamed Ismail, Shabaan A. Hemeda, Abeer F. El Nahas, Eman M. Abbas, Ahmed Mamoon, Hani Nazmi, and Ehab El-Haroun. 2025. "Selection for Growth Performance in Oreochromis niloticus Across Different Aquatic Environments Using Growth Hormone Gene Polymorphisms" Animals 15, no. 14: 2097. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani15142097

APA Style

Ali, F. S., Awad, S. T., Ismail, M., Hemeda, S. A., El Nahas, A. F., Abbas, E. M., Mamoon, A., Nazmi, H., & El-Haroun, E. (2025). Selection for Growth Performance in Oreochromis niloticus Across Different Aquatic Environments Using Growth Hormone Gene Polymorphisms. Animals, 15(14), 2097. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani15142097

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop